Search

Background: Acute retinal necrosis is a rare but devastating acute posterior uveitis caused by a member of the herpes virus family. We report an extremely rare ARN case following penetrating trauma in the contralateral eye., Case Presentation: A 61-year-old male was misdiagnosed as sympathetic ophthalmia due to a penetrating trauma history of the contralateral eye. The subsequent administration of high-dose IVMP therapy led to rapid progression of the retinal necrosis. ARN was strongly suspected base on the clinical examination and confirmed by the PCR aqueous testing. The patient finally got good visual outcomes by the effective and prompt antiviral treatment., Conclusion: Ophthalmologists should be alert to the possibility that penetrating injury can trigger the activation of latent viruses. If a patient experiences visual symptoms in the contralateral eye after an open-globe injury, it is recommended that a thorough peripheral retinal examination be performed to avoid missing ARN.

Purpose: To report a case of alternate herpes simplex virus (HSV)-related inflammation in the cornea and retina in over two decades., Methods: Penetrating keratoplasty was performed for HSV stromal keratitis, which had occurred repeatedly over the earlier 7 years, in 2004, and vitrectomy was performed for acute retinal necrosis (ARN) in 2021 in the right eye of the patient. Systemic and topical antivirals and immunosuppressants were administered for HSV reactivation., Results: The viruses remained quiescent for 17 years after keratoplasty until reactivation occurred and triggered ARN. The retina became reattached after vitrectomy. One year after the onset of ARN, the eye developed HSV epithelial keratitis. The opacified corneal graft recovered transparency 1 week after medical treatment., Conclusion: HSV may cause inflammation in different eye tissues within a long time. It is important to be aware of the possibility of uveitis or retinitis in patients with a history of HSV keratitis.

Background: Acute retinal necrosis (ARN) is a progressive necrotizing retinitis caused by viral infection. Optimal management strategies have not been established for this detrimental disease. Previous literature published suggests that Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) and Herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV1) are the most common promoters of acute retinal necrosis (ARN)., Aims: The purpose of our study was to investigate the viral distribution, demographic, and treatment outcomes of ARN., Methods: A retrospective chart review evaluated data from PCR-positive ARN patients diagnosed between 2009 and 2018., Results: Analysis of fourteen eyes from 12 patients found CMV and VZV as the commonest causes of ARN. Patients on 1 g of valacyclovir three times a day (V1T) had worse vision between first and final visits (mean difference of 1.25 ± 0.65, n = 2) compared with patients treated with 2 g of valacyclovir three times a day (V2T), or 900 mg twice a day of valganciclovir (V9B) (mean difference of - 0.067 ± 0.13, n = 6, and 0.067 ± 0.067, n = 6, respectively). Both V1T patients developed retinal detachments (RD). Both CMV patients treated with intravitreal triamcinolone developed ARN, elevated IOP, and one developed multiple RD., Conclusions: Our review found increased incidence of CMV-positive ARN. Patients with zone 1 disease had worse initial visual acuity. Moreover, patients had more favorable outcomes with V2T and V9B compared to V1T. CMV-positive patients clinically worsened after intravitreal steroid injections, further underscoring the value of a PCR diagnosis to tailor the patients' treatment plan accordingly., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland.)

Acute retinal necrosis (ARN) is a relatively uncommon yet devastating cause of vision-threatening uveitis. This manuscript analyzed the cases of ARN that have been reported following SARS-CoV-2 infections and anti- SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations. A total of nine cases of ARN were reported in the literature. Among them, four patients with ARN were attributed to SARS-CoV-2 infections, and a history of recent Covid vaccination was present in five patients when a diagnosis of ARN was made. ARN has been described following SARS-CoV-2 infections or vaccinations against the virus, and many of these cases may be based on a cause-to-effect hypothesis.

Background: Varicella zoster reactivation is an increasingly recognised event following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. In addition, various ocular inflammatory and infectious adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination have been described in the literature. This case report describes acute retinal necrosis (ARN) secondary to varicella zoster virus (VZV) reactivation following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination., Case Description: A 42-year-old immunocompetent man developed left ARN 12 days following first dose of Pfizer BioNTech mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. Aqueous and vitreous tap polymerase chain reaction testing was positive for VZV. Good visual outcome was achieved with combination therapy, including intravitreal foscarnet, oral valaciclovir and prednisolone, topical dexamethasone and atropine, and barrier retinal laser. Second dose of the vaccine is planned under cover of high-dose oral valaciclovir therapy., Conclusion: This case illustrates the possible association between COVID-19 vaccination and potentially blinding VZV reactivation. Therefore, prompt ophthalmic assessment is recommended in patients with visual disturbance following COVID-19 vaccination.

Purpose: To present the clinical features of a rare case of varicella zoster infection following one dose of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination in an elderly Asian Indian male., Methods: Retrospective observational case report., Results: A 71-year-old gentleman presented to us with complaints of reduced vision associated with redness and pain in his right eye for 1 week. On examination he revealed a right eye pan uveitis picture with circumcorneal congestion, multiple fine keratic precipitates, anterior chamber cells and flare, vitritis and widespread areas of acute retinal necrosis. His left eye was within normal limits. Ten days prior to the presentation he had received the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine following which he had developed fever for 2 days that preceded the red eye. The patient's aqueous sample tested positive for varicella zoster virus (VZV) by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay from the aqueous and also from the nasopharyngeal swab was negative., Conclusion and Significance: To the best of our knowledge this is the earliest description of a case that has a viral reactivation following COVID-19 vaccination. Elderly people with pre-existing comorbidities, may be at a risk of both primary coronavirus infection and unconceivable risk of aberrant immune reactions leading to a different virus infection or reactivation need to be kept in mind. We present a possible link between SARS-CoV-2 virus vaccination and varicella zoster reactivation in this patient.

Purpose: To report a case of acute retinal necrosis (ARN) after receiving COVID-19 vaccination., Methods: A case report., Results: A 78-year-old man complained of blurred vision and floaters in the right eye 2 days after receiving BNT162b2 mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine and was referred to our hospital with worsening visual acuity after 7 days. He had no systemic symptoms and no history of systemic diseases. Ophthalmic examination revealed white-yellowish placoid lesions spreading to the entire circumference of the retina, and temporal and upper lesions extending to the posterior pole, although anterior inflammation and vitreous opacity were mild. Diagnostic and therapeutic vitrectomy was performed, and VZV-DNA was detected by comprehensive PCR using a vitreous fluid sample. The ocular inflammation subsided by systemic administration of antivirals and corticosteroids. However, total retinal detachment requiring repeat vitrectomy using silicone oil occurred after the second vaccination., Conclusion: ARN associated with VZV reactivation may develop after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination.

Significance: Acute retinal necrosis is a rare, sight-threatening condition typically found in immunocompromised patients and is most commonly caused by varicella zoster virus. Because of the poor prognosis and rapid progression of the disease course, prompt antiviral management is paramount., Purpose: A case report of acute retinal necrosis in a patient with herpes virus infection after a cervical epidural corticosteroid injection was performed. Extensive laboratory work and frequent follow-ups are necessary for management. This case report outlines the clinical signs of acute retinal necrosis and discusses the appropriate referrals and treatment needed to improve prognosis., Case Report: A 63-year-old man presented to our eye clinic with symptoms of pain and light sensitivity. Examination revealed anterior uveitis, vitritis, optic disc edema, macular edema, vasculitis, and retinitis of the left eye. The serum antibody test results showed abnormal ranges for varicella zoster virus and herpes simplex virus type 1, and the patient was diagnosed with acute retinal necrosis. Treatment prescribed by a retina specialist included oral valacyclovir and later oral prednisolone, for which the patient responded well before developing the common complication of retinal detachment., Conclusions: The progressive nature of acute retinal necrosis is usually debilitating to vision, even when managed properly. Because prognosis is often poor, it is important to make proper diagnoses combined with a complete review of the patient's medical history and immune status to prevent further vision loss., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Disclosure : None of the authors have reported a financial conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Optometry.)

Purpose: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the role of prophylactic laser retinopexy in preventing rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) in acute retinal necrosis (ARN)., Methods: Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched for eligible studies from inception to July 2020. Comprehensive clinical demographics were extracted from each study by two independent investigators. A random effects model was selected to analyze the OR of RRD risk and visual outcome with 95%CI. Subsequent subgroup and sensitivity analysis were conducted to evaluate the source of heterogeneity., Results: A total of eight studies and 247 eyes (111 prophylactic laser retinopexy eyes and 136 eyes receiving antiviral treatment) were included in this analysis. There was moderate statistical heterogeneity across all studies. When compared with routine antiviral treatment alone, RRD risk decreased in patients receiving prophylactic laser retinopexy, however, this was not statistically significant (P = 0.09, OR = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.15-1.15). There was significant improvement in BCVA during the follow-up period in the prophylactic laser retinopexy subgroup (P = 0.01, WMD = - 0.98, 95%CI: - 1.74, - 0.22)., Conclusion: Based on current analysis, our results did not support convincing evidence of prophylactic laser in preventing RRD. Future studies featuring high-quality, multicenter trials will be required to correct baseline characteristics., Trial Registration: This meta-analysis has been retrospectively registered in Prospero (registration number: CRD42020201008)., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.)

Purpose : Infection by the SARS-CoV2 virus results in an immune dysregulated state which can predispose to reactivation of Herpes viruses. This report describes the development of Acute Retinal Necrosis (ARN) in two patients who had recovered from SARS-CoV2 infection. Methods: Observational report of two consecutive patients who presented with ARN after having recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection. Results: Case 1 was a 5-year-old child with extensive peripheral necrotizing retinitis. Case 2 was a 61-year-old gentlemen with bilateral retinal detachment with sieve-like breaks and optic atrophy. Both patients had recovered from SARS- Cov-2 infection 1 month ago. PCR from vitreous sample of both patients was positive for Herpes simplex virus. Case 1 was treated with oral valacyclovir. Case 2 underwent surgery in both eyes for retinal detachment Conclusion: Immune dysregulation after COVID-19 infection can result in reactivation of herpesvirus and may lead to development of ARN.

Purpose: Determine the efficacy of combination intravitreal and systemic antiviral therapy for the treatment of acute retinal necrosis (ARN) and risk factors impacting visual acuity (VA) and retinal detachment (RD) outcomes., Design: Single-center retrospective case series., Participants: Patients with an ARN diagnosis based on clinical features and polymerase chain reaction confirmation who were treated at a tertiary referral, university-based academic practice., Methods: Patient records were reviewed for demographic information including age and gender. Snellen VA, disease findings including RD outcomes, optic nerve involvement, and treatments were recorded. Incidence rates of major VA and RD outcomes were calculated based on the number of events and exposure times. Cox proportional hazards regression modeling and survival analyses were used to identify factors related to VA and RD outcomes over time., Main Outcome Measures: Logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution VA, 2-line or more VA gain, severe vision loss (SVL) of 20/200 or worse, RD development, and fellow eye involvement., Results: Twenty-three eyes of 21 patients (11 male, 10 female) were reviewed. Thirteen patients (62%) had herpes simplex virus and 8 patients (38%) had varicella zoster virus. The event rate for 2-line or more VA gain was 0.49 events/eye-year (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26-0.86 events/eye-year), whereas the rate of SVL was 0.61 events/eye-year (95% CI, 0.34-1.02 events/eye-year). Retinal detachment development was observed at a rate of 0.59 events/eye-year (95% CI, 0.33-1.00 events/eye-year). Thirteen of 23 eyes (57%) demonstrated RD with a mean time of 120 days after ARN diagnosis. With each additional quadrant of retina involved, a greater risk of RD development over time was observed (hazard ratio, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.12-4.35). Nine percent of eyes progressed with additional quadrantic involvement, despite combination systemic and intravitreal antiviral therapy; however, none of the 19 patients demonstrating unilateral ARN showed fellow-eye involvement after initiation of therapy., Conclusions: Combination intravitreal and systemic antiviral therapy for ARN can be effective in improving VA and limiting retinitis progression. Each additional quadrant of retina involved was associated with a 2.2-fold greater risk of RD, which may impact monitoring, timing of intervention, and patient counseling., (Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Ophthalmology. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To the best of our knowledge, we present a rare case report describing an occurrence of acute retinal necrosis in an otherwise healthy individual who received the shingles vaccine., Methods: Observational case report., Patient: A 63-year-old healthy and immunocompetent white man presented with change of vision in the left eye after blunt trauma. A diagnosis of corneal abrasion was made. During follow-up, a detailed history discovered a progressive deterioration in vision over the past few weeks. Three months before presentation, he had received the shingles vaccine (Zostavax); 1 month before presentation, he reported an episode of varicella skin eruption on the face., Results: On examination, the patient was found to have acute retinal necrosis with white satellite lesions in the fundus of the left eye. An anterior chamber paracentesis and polymerase chain reaction confirmed the diagnosis of varicella-zoster virus., Conclusion: Varicella-zoster virus reactivation after shingles vaccination may predispose both immunocompetent and immunocompromised individuals to herpes-zoster ophthalmicus, leading to acute retinal necrosis.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of selected clinical parameters on the mid-/long-term visual outcome of patients with acute retinal necrosis (ARN), Design: A retrospective cohort study, Setting: Two University Hospitals (Parma, Italy; Lausanne, Switzerland)., Participants: Thirty-nine non-HIV patients (39 eyes) with ARN, as confirmed by polymerase chain reaction on intraocular samples. The following potential predictors were tested using linear regression models: age, sex, etiology, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) on admission, delay between ARN symptom onset and treatment initiation, and surgery (performed or not)., Main Outcome: BCVA at the final follow up, Results: Thirty-nine of 39 non-HIV patients (22 men and 17 women; mean age, 50 years) diagnosed with ARN were enrolled in the study. Etiologies were: varicella-zoster virus in 25 eyes (64%), herpes simplex viruses in the remaining 14 eyes. The average follow-up duration was 19 ± 13 months. All patients had undergone systemic antivirals; surgery was performed in 16 eyes. The mean delay between onset of visual symptoms and antiviral treatment initiation was 15 ± 31 days (range, 1-180 days). The mean BCVA at baseline was 0.83 ± 0.75 logMAR, while the mean final BCVA was 0.75 ± 0.81 logMAR. Both initial BCVA and treatment delay (TD) were significantly correlated with the final BCVA (p < 0.05)., Conclusions: Initial BCVA and TD seem to be significant predictors of mid-/long-term visual outcome in non-HIV patients affected by ARN.

Incidence of Herpes Zoster is relatively high. Herpes zoster ophthalmicus is one of the most common forms of the disease. Necrotising herpetic retinopathies (including acute retinal necrosis) are rare and usually these complications are presented in literature as individual cases. However, necrotising herpetic retinopathy can lead to complete loss of visual. The article reviews modern data on causation, diagnosis and treatment of acute retinal necrosis analyzing 40 open access articles from EBSCO published in 2011-2019, and describes the modern views on the prevalence and most important clinical features of herpetic acute retinal necrosis. Some contradictory opinions have been revealed concerning the diagnostic criteria and surgical treatment of acute retinal necrosis.

Purpose: Acute retinal necrosis (ARN) is a severe necrotizing retinitis caused by varicella-zoster virus or herpes simplex virus (HSV) that often results in blindness. Occasionally, HSV-caused ARN develops after herpes simplex encephalitis (HSE). It remains unknown, however, when and how often ARN develops after HSE. To investigate the actual conditions of patients with ARN following HSE and the interval period between the prior HSE and the onset of ARN, a retrospective nationwide survey of the Japanese population was performed., Study Design: Retrospective., Methods: Questionnaires were sent out to the neurology and ophthalmology departments of teaching hospitals in Japan. They inquired about HSE patients in neurology departments and ARN patients diagnosed with HSV in ophthalmology departments. The proportion of the HSV-ARN patients with a history of HSE and their interval periods were obtained from the questionnaires returned by the ophthalmology departments., Results: Neurology departments of 324 hospitals responded to the questionnaires (response proportion: 40.9%), and 53 HSE cases were reported. Ophthalmology departments of 535 hospitals responded the questionnaires (response proportion: 54.3%), and 67 HSV-ARN cases were reported. Among the 67 HSV-ARN cases, 16 (23.9%) had histories of prior HSE. Although the interval periods from the prior HSE to the onset of HSV-ARN varied among cases, nearly half developed HSV-ARN within 2 years., Conclusions: This nationwide survey of the Japanese population showed that HSV-ARN develops after HSE in higher frequency within 2 years. Neurologists and ophthalmologists should be aware that HSE survivors have a risk of contracting HSV-ARN.

A 60-year-old man with a history of severe herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) encephalitis 2 years prior presented with acute onset of visual loss in the left eye. Dilated funduscopic examination showed retinitis and occlusive vasculitis with retinal necrosis. PCR of the vitreous fluid was positive for HSV-1, and he was diagnosed with acute retinal necrosis (ARN) due to HSV-1. The patient was treated with intravenous acyclovir and intravitreous foscarnet for 2 weeks, followed by high dose oral valacyclovir for 2 weeks. He was subsequently placed on planned life-long suppressive valacyclovir. His case demonstrates that acute visual loss concomitant with or subsequent to HSV-1 encephalitis warrants suspicion of ARN. Prompt therapy with effective antiviral medication is necessary to reduce the risk of sight-threatening complications. Chronic suppression with oral antiviral therapy after ARN is recommended to prevent involvement of the contralateral eye, though there is no consensus on the duration and dosage of antivirals., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Herpes virus is considered to be the pathogen of acute retinal necrosis (ARN) infection. Previous studies have found that patients with ARN caused by the varicella-zoster virus (VZV) are often older, and patients with herpes simplex virus (HSV) induced ARN are considerably younger. However, in our clinical work, we find that VZV is also a pathogen in younger ARN patients. We, therefore, aimed to analyze the common etiology of younger ARN patients., Methods: A retrospective analysis was made of 20 eyes (18 patients) diagnosed as having ARN in the Department of Ophthalmology of Peking Union Medical College Hospital from 2014 to 2016. All patients were reviewed for demographic data, clinical course, clinical manifestations, time from onset to initial physician visit, duration of follow-up, visual acuity at both presentation and final visit, and treatment strategies. A paired t test was used to compare visual acuity between the presenting vision and those of final follow-up. Vitreous or aqueous specimens from 18 eyes of 18 patients were analyzed with multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR)/quantitative PCR (qPCR) and xTAG-liquid chip technology (xTAG-LCT) to determine the causative virus of ARN., Results: Final best visual acuity (BCVA) improved significantly from 1.36 ± 0.95 (median 20/400) to 0.95 ± 0.82 (median 20/100) (t = 2.714, P = 0.015) after systemic and intravitreal antiviral treatment combined with or without pars plana vitrectomy. PCR and xTAG-LCT results showed four of the five samples in the younger group (32.2 ± 5.2 years) and 12 of the 13 samples in the senior group (53.6 ± 4.9 years) were positive for VZV, and two of the five samples in the younger group were positive for HSV-1., Conclusions: This study demonstrates that VZV is also a common causative virus for ARN in younger patients. Considering this finding, a systemic antiviral treatment protocol should be immediately changed to intravenous ganciclovir when the patient does not respond to acyclovir before determining the causative virus, especially in younger patients.

Purpose : To describe clinical features and outcome in bilateral acute retinal necrosis (BARN). Methods : Observational retrospective longitudinal review of ocular findings. Results : Thirty eyes of 15 patients (age 44.1 ± 15.8). Delay of involvement between eyes was 57.2 ± 105.2 months (median 3, range 0.5-360). Herpes simplex virus (HSV)-1 was the most frequent (20 eyes, 66.6%), followed by HSV-2 (five eyes, 16.7%) and varicella zoster virus (VZV, four eyes, 13.3%). Visual acuity worsened in 7 (23%) eyes, improved in 4 (13%), and remained stable in 19 (63%). Major complications included retinal detachment (11 eyes, 36%), optic atrophy (11 eyes, 33%), proliferative vitreoretinopathy (four eyes, 13.3%), neovascular glaucoma (four eyes, 13.3%), phthisis bulbi (three eyes, 10%). Symptoms-to-referral average time was 2.7 ± 1.0 weeks (range 1-4). Conclusions : In our study BARN was associated with severe visual outcome and high rate of ocular complications. Although BARN is a rare disease, the course is aggressive, regardless prompt referral in tertiary-care uveitis centers.

Purpose: To report a case of bilateral varicella zoster virus (VZV)-associated acute retinal necrosis (ARN) occurring after both eyes sequential cataract surgery in an elderly immunocompromised patient., Methods: Medical records and investigation results of the patient were reviewed., Results: Patient experienced floaters and blurring of vision in both eyes 4 weeks after her second uncomplicated cataract surgery. Clinical signs of granulomatous keratic precipitates, prominent vitritis, retinitis and vascular thrombosis were noted in both eyes. Aqueous samples from both eyes were positive for VZV. Disease was treated with intravitreal foscarnet bilaterally and 10 days of systemic intravenous acyclovir (10 mg/kg) followed by oral valaciclovir 1 g three times daily. Final visual acuity at 4 months after initial presentation was 20/60 in both eyes with no retinal detachment noted., Conclusions: Cataract surgery may have been the trigger for bilateral VZV-associated ARN. Immunocompromised patients can develop ARN and require close observation after cataract surgery. This is, to our knowledge, the first report of bilateral ARN following routine cataract surgery.

Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.

Purpose: To report a case of herpes zoster keratitis in a patient undergoing treatment for herpetic acute retinal necrosis., Methods: Case report., Results: A 71 year old male presented with acute retinal necrosis of the left eye due to herpes zoster and was treated with intravitreal foscarnet and oral valcyclovir. He developed a retinal detachment and underwent surgical repair. After four weeks, he developed an ipsilateral herpetic zoster keratitis demonstrated by Rose-Bengal staining that was responsive to topical ganciclovir gel., Conclusions: This case report describes the unusual development of herpes zoster keratitis after the development of unilateral acute retinal necrosis (ARN) in a patient on antiviral treatment.

A retired woman with left ophthalmic shingles of over 2 years' duration attended with bilateral vision loss and systemic upset. Acute retinal necrosis with detachment was detected on right fundus examination. Cataract in left eye precluded funduscopy. Ocular ultrasonography revealed fibrotic retinal detachment in the left eye. MRI brain and orbits also showed signals of retinal detachment. No abnormal MRI signal within the optic nerve or brain was found. Varicella zoster virus was detected in ocular aqueous and blood samples. High-dose intravenous acyclovir was administered. HIV test was positive with a very low CD4 count. Antiretroviral medications were prescribed. There was no recovery of vision. She was certified as blind, and social services were involved in seeking to provide alterations to her home in view of her severe disability. This case highlights the importance of suspecting HIV in patients with severe or chronic ophthalmic shingles. Images and implications for clinical practice are presented., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© BMJ Publishing Group Ltd (unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)

We report acute retinal necrosis caused by the vaccine Oka strain following immunization of a 78-year-old woman with live zoster vaccine. Whole genome sequencing confirmed the ocular vOka strain to be derived from the vaccine and excluded the presence of new mutations or recombination with wild-type Varicella zoster virus., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

We report an unusual case of retained metallic intraocular foreign body (IOFB) presenting with acute retinal necrosis (ARN). A healthy young man presented with signs of ARN including hypopyon, dense vitritis, and peripheral retinal necrosis following alleged history of trauma with a high-velocity projectile. After initial management of ARN with systemic antivirals, a retained metallic IOFB was identified and subsequently removed surgically. The patient was followed up for 12 months postoperatively and retained excellent vision without recurrence of the ARN. The diagnosis of an IOFB in a case with associated inflammation can be challenging. A strong clinical suspicion with proper investigations can achieve optimum results.

Purpose: Acute retinal necrosis (ARN) is a feared complication of infectious retinitis most commonly caused by varicella zoster virus (VZV). We performed a pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation study by integrating the existing understanding of physiology with previously published data to evaluate the vitreal penetration of oral valacyclovir for the treatment of ARN, under various dosing scenarios., Method: We compared different oral valacyclovir dosing regimens with intravenous acyclovir. The vitreous compartment was modeled as a peripheral compartment, and paired serum and vitreal acyclovir concentrations were obtained from previously published data of adult patients with ARN undergoing vitrectomy. The efficacy threshold for vitreal acyclovir concentrations was based on the previously reported IC 50 values for VZV., Results: Based on the minimum vitreal acyclovir concentrations (C min ) relative to the mean IC 50 for VZV, valacyclovir 1.5 g every 8 hours performed similarly to intravenous acyclovir 700 mg every 8 hours, with the minimum concentration (C min ) exceeding the mean IC 50 after the second dose. In contrast, the standard dosing regimen for herpes zoster, valacyclovir 1 g every 8 hours, performed inferiorly to the intravenous acyclovir regimen throughout the dosing interval., Conclusions: Modeling and simulation data support oral valacyclovir for the treatment of ARN, although the required dosing exceeds the recommended FDA dose size for herpes zoster.

Purpose: To identify determinants of adverse outcomes in acute retinal necrosis (ARN), presenting characteristics and incidence rates of vision loss and ocular complications in a cohort of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive eyes were analyzed., Design: Retrospective observational cohort study., Methods: Forty-one eyes of 36 patients with clinically diagnosed ARN, PCR-positive for herpes simplex virus or varicella zoster virus and evaluated between January 2002 and June 2013, were included. Main outcome measures included incidence rates of vision loss and retinal detachment (RD)., Results: Presenting visual acuity was generally poor (20/50 to >20/200 in 27%; 20/200 or worse in 56%). The incidence rate of ≤20/200 was 0.66/eye-year (EY), (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32/EY to 1.22/EY); the rate of light perception or no light perception vision was 0.07/EY (95% CI, 0.02/EY to 0.16/EY). During follow-up, 59% of eyes developed at least 1 RD (rate = 0.40/EY, 95% CI, 0.19/EY to 0.58/EY). Eyes with retinitis involving ≥25% of the retina at presentation detached at nearly 12 times the rate, as compared to those with <25% retinal involvement (0.70/EY vs 0.06/EY; P = .001). Development of an RD was the greatest determinant of adverse visual outcomes, with 4% of eyes, that had experienced at least 1 RD, achieving a best-corrected visual acuity of ≥20/40 compared to 53% of eyes that never detached (P = .0003)., Conclusions: Poor outcomes in ARN were common in this cohort. RD confers the greatest risk of incident vision loss, and once 25% or more of the retina is involved the risk of RD and visual loss increases significantly., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

A 55-year-old man was admitted to our hospital for investigation of high fever, decreased consciousness and bilateral visual impairment. His cerebrospinal fluid analysis revealed pleocytosis of mononuclear cells and an increased protein concentration. FLAIR images revealed multiple high-intensity lesions in the frontal lobe, part of which was enhanced with gadolinium. Despite initiating treatment with acyclovir and corticosteroids, his consciousness and visual acuity deteriorated. Immunopathological examination of brain biopsies showed numerous herpes simplex virus type 2-positive neurons and macrophages, leading to a diagnosis of herpes simplex encephalitis (HSE). Fundoscopic examination revealed multiple foci of retinitis with vasculopathies, and inflammation in the anterior chamber and vitreous, indicating acute retinal necrosis (ARN). Foscarnet treatment was initiated in place of acyclovir and his consciousness improved, with a slight improvement in visual acuity. ARN is typically caused by a herpes virus infection limited to the eyeball, and rarely in combination with HSE. In such cases, there is a latency of approximately 2-4 weeks between ARN and the onset of encephalitis. Our case is unique in that HSE and ARN developed simultaneously, and it highlights that there may not always be a latency between the onsets of the two disorders. Finally, foscarnet should be considered in cases of HSE and ARN with acyclovir resistance.

Purpose: To describe unilateral periarterial plaque in a case of bilateral acute retinal necrosis (BARN) due to varicella zoster virus (VZV)., Methods: Case report., Results: A 43-year-old diabetic male presented to us with dimness of vision in the left eye for three months. He was already on oral steroids and anti-viral therapy. Best-corrected visual acuity was 6/6 OD and hand movements close to face OS. The right eye showed inferior and temporal retinal thinning and pigmentation and periarterial whitish focal Kyrieleis' plaques, specifically along arterioles. Left eye had mild vitritis, optic disc pallor, arteriolar attenuation, with retinal whitening and areas of pigmentation involving 360° of peripheral retina along with some involvement of the posterior pole. Serology for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), herpes simplex virus (HSV), and cytomegalo virus (CMV) was negative. IgM for VZV was positive. Oral Valacyclovir 1 g thrice daily was continued and a slow taper of oral steroids was instituted., Conclusions: ARN should be considered as a differential diagnosis in cases with Kyrieleis' plaques and a peripheral retinal examination must be done to rule out patches of healed retinitis and vasculitis.

A 72 years old female presented with bilateral painless progressive loss of vision over one year. She was diagnosed as non-resolving bilateral panuveitis. Her visual acuity in right eye was hand movement close to face and left eye was perception of light with inaccurate projection of rays. Bilateral anterior chamber had 1+ cells and flares. Vitreous cells had 1+ cells and haze in right eye but the left eye had 3+ vitreous cells and haze. Right eye fundus had multiple, discrete sub retinal yellowish deposits with subretinal haemorrhage and macular edema with perivascular infiltrates. In left eye, disc was just visible. The patient underwent diagnostic vitrectomy in left eye and undiluted vitreous sample on cytology showed reactive large lymphoid cells with necrotic background pattern suggestive of intraocular lymphoma. Patient underwent external beam radiotherapy and chemotherapy., (© NEPjOPH.)

Introduction. We present the case of a 73-year-old woman with osteoporosis, who presented to the emergency room with a sudden vision loss and ocular pain in the right eye, which appeared two days before. The patient mentioned loss of appetite, weight loss for three months and low fever for two weeks. Materials and methods. Among the ophthalmological findings, the most important were panuveitis, and large confluent necrotic areas in the peripheral retina. The patient was diagnosed with RE Panuveitis and acute necrotizing retinitis. Results. Blood exams showed leukocytosis and monocytosis, thrombocytosis and anemia. Further investigations showed high levels of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) anti IgG and Herpes Simplex (HS) type 1 virus anti IgM, urinary infection, and secondary hepatic cytolysis. The CT and MRI of the thorax and abdomen showed no sign of neoplastic disease, and no explanation for the CMV infection was found. The patient received general corticotherapy and antiviral therapy, and, after one month, RE BCVA was 20/ 30. Particularity of the case. Acute necrotizing retinitis in an old patient with CMV and HSV type 1, associated with secondary hepatic cytolysis, without any other immunosuppressive disease and very good outcome.

We describe two young immunocompetent women presenting with bilateral retinitis with outer retinal necrosis involving posterior pole with centrifugal spread and multifocal lesions simulating progressive outer retinal necrosis (PORN) like retinitis. Serology was negative for HIV and CD4 counts were normal; however, both women were on oral steroids at presentation for suspected autoimmune chorioretinitis. The retinitis in both eyes responded well to oral valaciclovir therapy. However, the eye with the more fulminant involvement developed retinal detachment with a loss of vision. Retinal atrophy was seen in the less involved eye with preservation of vision. Through these cases, we aim to describe a unique evolution of PORN-like retinitis in immunocompetent women, which was probably aggravated by a short-term immunosuppression secondary to oral steroids., (2016 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.)

We present the case of a 34-year-old male, admitted for progressive bilateral loss of vision after a recent episode of chickenpox. Ophthalmological exam revealed bilateral acute retinal necrosis. As the patient was following a drug detoxification program, he was tested for HIV, HVB, HVC, and results highly positive. Immediate intravenous therapy with high doses of acyclovir and methylprednisolone was initiated, but the evolution was extremely severe resulting in necrotic retinal detachment. Surgery was performed in right eye, but no improvement of visual acuity was observed., Conclusions: The fulminant evolution of bilateral acute retinal necrosis and the lack of response to maximal intravenous therapy were clinical elements indicating coexistent immunosuppressive disease. Very severe acute retinal necrosis may occur in immunosuppressed patients, leading to blindness.

Necrotising retinopathies can be visually devastating. Most often associated with the viral family Herpesviridae and seen in both immune-competent and immunocompromised hosts, possible complications of necrotising retinopathies include progressive retinal necrosis with or without macular involvement, optic neuropathy and ultimately, secondary retinal detachment. Examples include progressive outer retinal necrosis, acute retinal necrosis and cytomegaloviral retinitis. If diagnosed early and treated aggressively, visual complications can be prevented; however, there is no current consensus on the most appropriate antiviral regimen for each of the different varieties of necrotising herpetic retinopathy. This paper reviews aspects of varieties of necrotising herpetic retinopathy, including pathophysiology, treatment and diagnostic testing., (© 2016 Optometry Australia.)

Case Report: The case is reported of acute retinal necrosis with bilateral involvement due to Varicella Zoster virus in a 77 year-old man. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of aqueous humor was positive for Varicella Zoster virus (VZV). He developed a Kyrieleis' vasculitis a month after the starting treatment, when the PCR analysis was negative., Discussion: PCR is a quick and safe technique, with a high sensitivity and specificity of 97%, useful to diagnose and monitor the viral activity. The intervention must be urgent, due to the dramatically rapid evolution. Oral famciclovir oral is good alternative owing to its bioavailability., (Copyright © 2014 Sociedad Española de Oftalmología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

A 52-year-old woman undergoing azathioprine treatment for rheumatoid arthritis developed acute retinal necrosis a month after intravitreal dexamethasone (Ozurdex ®) implantation for posterior uveitis in the left eye. Varicella zoster virus (VZV) DNA was detected in the anterior chamber and vitreous samples on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis. Retinal detachment occurred despite systemic and intravitreal antiviral therapy. Favorable structural and functional outcomes were achieved after retinal surgery with silicone oil. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first reported case of acute retinal necrosis following placement of an Ozurdex® implant. Physicians practicing Ozurdex® implantations should be aware of this unusual but devastating complication. Extra caution and frequent follow-up are required in all immunocompromised patients receiving Ozurdex® implantation.

Acute retinal necrosis is a rare manifestation of viral chorioretinitis, accompanied by occlusive vasculitis, which is associated with poor visual prognosis. The main causal factors include varicella-zoster virus in older patients and herpes simplex in younger ones. The disease typically manifests as a reactivation of latent infections. We present a case of a 57-year-old female with atypical clinical manifestation of acute retinal necrosis secondary to the primary viral infection with herpes simplex. The serology panel of vitreous tap and blood sample confirmed viral aetiology (H. simplex). The initial clinical signs included optic disc edema with retinitis presenting as self-limiting, slowly progressing, peripheral lesions, later followed by uveitis. The antiviral therapy resolved the symptoms of uveitis and enabled healing of retinal lesions, however the natural course of disease was later complicated with retinal detachment. It was successfully treated with vitreoretinal surgery. Despite aggressive treatment, the final visual outcome was unfavourable, due to optic nerve atrophy.

Purpose: To describe the pattern of acute retinal necrosis (ARN) syndrome in a referral center in Tunisia., Methods: Retrospective review of the charts of 12 patients (12 eyes)., Results: Necrotizing retinitis involved >50% of the retina in 33.3% of eyes. Polymerase chain reaction on aqueous humor sample identified herpes simplex virus-1 in 4 eyes (33.3%) and varicella zoster virus in 3 eyes (25%), and was negative in 5 eyes (41.7%). All patients received intravenous acyclovir, followed by oral antivirals. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 16 months. Retinal detachment (RD) occurred in 3 eyes (25%), but no patient developed bilateral ARN. Final visual acuity was 20/200 or worse in 7 eyes (58.3%). Delay in diagnosis (p = 0.015), macular involvement (p = 0.045), development of RD (p = 0.018), and 25-50% of retinal involvement (p = 0.045) were associated with a worse visual outcome., Conclusion: ARN carries poor visual prognosis in Tunisia.

Background and Objective: Acute retinal necrosis (ARN) may lead to severe visual loss because of its rapid progression and high likelihood of retinal detachment (RD). This study investigates whether combination systemic and intravitreal antiviral therapy is superior to systemic antiviral therapy alone., Patients and Methods: Single-center, interventional, comparative case series of patients with ARN treated with combination systemic antiviral and intravitreal foscarnet injection therapy or systemic antiviral therapy alone. Survival analysis and incidence rates of visual acuity (VA) gain of two lines or greater, severe visual loss of 20/200 or worse, and RD were assessed., Results: Twelve patients received combination therapy and 12 received systemic therapy alone. Patients receiving combination therapy were more likely to gain two or more lines of VA and showed decreased incidences of severe visual loss and RD., Conclusion: Combination oral and intravitreal antiviral therapy may improve the likelihood for VA gain and decrease the risk of RD in patients with ARN. Clinicians should consider administering combination systemic and intravitreal antiviral therapy for patients with the ARN syndrome.