Search

Anti-PD-1 antibodies revolutionized the treatment of advanced melanoma patients. However, one out of three do not respond to this therapy, with an overall poor prognosis. Identification of predictive biomarkers in patients receiving immune-based therapies is necessary for minimizing risk of toxicity and optimizing patient benefit and is still an important unmet clinical need. Recently, many studies have evaluated peripheral blood markers as potential biomarkers, but none so far have been validated. We collected at baseline peripheral blood samples from 18 consecutive advanced melanoma patients treated with anti-PD-1 therapy. Main pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines were studied in PBMCs from baseline blood samples both evaluating mRNA expression by qRT-PCR and identifying PBMCs subpopulations by FACS analysis. We found that IFN-γ mRNA expression levels were significantly higher in responder patients compared to non-responder ones. Moreover, to better validate its role, we evaluated the IFN-γ/IL-10 ratio. This value was higher in responder patients. FACS analysis confirmed that CD4 + IFN-γ + PBMCs percentage was higher in responders. Our data suggest an interesting correlation between IFN-γ/IL-10 ratio and response to anti-PD-1 therapy in advanced melanoma patients, suggesting a new biomarker that could be easily incorporated in clinical practice.

Innate and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy (EGFRi) is a major limitation in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Although RAS genes are the most commonly mutated innate and acquired oncogenes in cancer, there are a number of other mechanisms that limit the effectiveness of EGFRi. Patients with innate resistance have been found to contain BRAFV600E mutations, and possibly MET, MEK, PIK3CA, PTEN, and HER2 alterations. Meanwhile, BRAFV600E mutations may also be involved in acquired resistance to EGFRi, in addition to EGFR ectodomain mutations, MET alterations, and possibly HER2 amplification. In addition, paracrine effects and cell-fate mechanisms of resistance are being increasingly described as contributing to acquired resistance. Utilization of circulating tumor DNA has been paramount in monitoring the dynamic nature of acquired resistance and has helped to guide treatment decisions, particularly in the EGFRi rechallenge setting. Herein, we provide an in-depth review of EGFRi-resistance mechanisms and describe the current therapeutic landscape in the hopes of identifying effective rechallenge strategies.

The single-arm phase II CAVE mCRC trial evaluated the combination of cetuximab plus avelumab as rechallenge strategy in RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients, with clinical response to first-line anti-EGFR-based chemotherapy, who progressed and received a subsequent line of therapy. The correlation of skin toxicity (ST) and different clinico-molecular variables with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate (RR) was assessed at univariate and multivariate analysis. A total of 33/77 (42.9%) patients experienced grade 2–3 ST and displayed median OS (mOS) of 17.8 months (CI 95%, 14.9–20.6), whereas 44/77 (57.1%) patients with grade 0–1 ST exhibited mOS of 8.2 months (CI 95%, 5.5–10.9), (hazard ratio (HR), 0.51, CI 95%, 0.29–0.89, p = 0.019). Median PFS (mPFS) was 4.6 months (CI 95%, 3.4–5.7) in patients with grade 2–3 ST, compared to patients with grade 0–1 ST with mPFS of 3.4 months (CI 95%, 2.7–4.1, HR, 0.49, CI 95%, 0.3–0.8, p = 0.004). Grade 2–3 ST (HR, 0.51, p = 0.019) and RAS/BRAF/EGFR WT circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) (HR, 0.50, CI 95%, 0.27–0.9, p = 0.019) had a statistically significant effect on OS at univariate analysis. At the multivariate analysis, RAS/BRAF/EGFR WT ctDNA status maintained statistical significance (HR, 0.49, p = 0.023), whereas there was a trend towards ST grade 2–3 (HR, 0.54, CI 95%, 0.29–1.01, p = 0.054). Skin toxicity is a promising biomarker to identify patients with mCRC that could benefit of anti-EGFR rechallenge.

Simple Summary HCC is a very aggressive disease and patients diagnosed in an advanced/metastatic setting obtain poor survival outcomes with standard treatments. In recent years, the introduction of immunotherapy strategies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors as single agents and in combination with already approved local and systemic treatments, has strongly changed the therapeutic landscape of HCC. Soon, the discovery of novel potential immune targets, together with the understanding of potential biomarkers of resistance, will help to better define novel treatment opportunities for patients with HCC. Abstract Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. The use of local treatment, such as surgical resection, liver transplant, and local ablation, has improved the survival of patients with HCC detected at an early stage. Until recently, the treatment of patients with metastatic disease was limited to the use of the multikinase inhibitor (MKI) sorafenib with a marginal effect on survival outcome. New target approaches, such as the oral MKI lenvatinib in first-line treatment and regorafenib, ramucirumab, and cabozantinib in later lines of therapy, have demonstrated efficacy in patients with preserved liver function (Child–Pugh class A) and good performance status. On the other hand, the implementation of immune checkpoint inhibitors directed against PD-1 (nivolumab and pembrolizumab), PD-L1 (atezolizumab), and anti-CTLA4 (ipilimumab) in the management of advanced HCC has strongly changed the continuum of care of HCC. Future research should include the evaluation of molecular biomarkers that can help patient selection and provide new insight on potential combined approaches. In this review, we provide an overview of the clinical evidence of the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in HCC, and discuss how immunotherapy has been implemented into the continuum of HCC care.

Background: Cutaneous malignant melanoma is an aggressive neoplasm. In advanced cases, the therapeutic choice depends on the mutational status of BRAF. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNA) is often applied to the management of patients affected by melanoma, mainly for the diagnosis of metastases. The evaluation of BRAF mutational status by sequencing technique on cytological samples may be inconvenient, as it is a time and biomaterial-consuming technique. Recently, BRAF immunocytochemistry (ICC) was applied for the evaluation of BRAF V600E mutational status. Although it may be useful mainly in cytological samples, data about BRAF ICC on cytological samples are missing. Methods: We performed BRAF ICC on a series of 50 FNA samples of metastatic melanoma. BRAF molecular analysis was performed on the same cytological samples or on the corresponding histological samples. Molecular analysis was considered the gold standard. Results: BRAF ICC results were adequate in 49 out of 50 (98%) cases, positive in 15 out of 50 (30%) cases and negative in 34 out of 50 (68%) of cases. Overall, BRAF ICC sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value results were 88.2%, 100%, 100% and 94.1%, respectively. The diagnostic performance of BRAF ICC results was perfect when molecular evaluation was performed on the same cytological samples. Hyperpigmentation represents the main limitation of the technique. Conclusions: BRAF ICC is a rapid, cost-effective method for detecting BRAF V600E mutation in melanoma metastases, applicable with high diagnostic performance to cytological samples. It could represent the first step to evaluate BRAF mutational status in cytological samples, mainly in poorly cellular cases.

Cancer immunotherapy has produced an unprecedented durable response rate, thus shifting from traditional doublet chemotherapy to immunotherapy-based treatments with and without chemotherapy as the first line strategies for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients without a molecular driver. However, the majority of patients do not benefit from the treatment or may relapse after a period of response. As few treatment options are available after failure of cancer immunotherapy, including the combination of chemotherapy and anti-angiogenic drugs, a better understanding of the mechanisms limiting cancer immunotherapy may be of help in the definition of the best second line. Whereas only retrospective data support an immunotherapy rechallenge approach, new combination strategies including immunotherapy and cell-signaling inhibitors or double immunotherapy represent the newest and most promising strategy to overcome primary or acquired resistance to first line immunotherapy.

Simple Summary The survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been improved over the years and now reaches 30–40 months. However, few therapeutic options are available after failure of first- and second-line treatments. In fact, prognosis of chemo-refractory mCRC remains poor. Therefore, new therapeutic strategies are needed. Emerging evidence suggest that retreatment with epidermal growth factor (EGFR) inhibitors after a treatment break, in patients that obtained a clinical benefit by previous anti-EGFR, could lead to prolonged survival. The rationale beyond this “rechallenge” strategy is that after a “treatment holiday” EGFR resistant cancer cells decay, restoring the sensibility to EGFR blockade. In this review we analyze the current knowledge of retreatment with EGFR inhibitors, examine the role of novel biomarkers that can guide the appropriate selection of patients. Finally, we discuss future perspectives and on-going clinical trials. Abstract The prognosis of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who progressed to the first and the second lines of treatment is poor. Thus, new therapeutic strategies are needed. During the last years, emerging evidence suggests that retreatment with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) in the third line of mCRC patients, that have previously obtained clinical benefit by first-line therapy with anti-EGFR MAbs plus chemotherapy, could lead to prolonged survival. The rationale beyond this “rechallenge” strategy is that, after disease progression to first line EGFR-based therapy, a treatment break from anti-EGFR drugs results in RAS mutant cancer cell decay, restoring the sensitivity of cancer cells to cetuximab and panitumumab. In fact, rechallenge treatment with anti-EGFR drugs has shown promising clinical activity, particularly in patients with plasma RAS and BRAF wild type circulating tumor DNA, as defined by liquid biopsy analysis at baseline treatment. The aim of this review is to analyze the current knowledge on rechallenge and to investigate the role of novel biomarkers that can guide the appropriate selection of patients that could benefit from this therapeutic strategy. Finally, we discuss on-going trials and future perspectives.

Clinical Practice Points • Metastatic colorectal cancer is one of the most common causes of cancer death worldwide. • Primary and acquired resistance mechanisms to anti-EGFR treatment are a challenging topic with several clinical implications. • Primary resistance is defined by the presence of activating mutations in BRAF and RAS genes before treatment initiation, while acquired resistance refers to the selection of pre-existing mutant clones or de novo acquisition of mutations under the pressure of anti EGFR treatment. • Testing mutations in RAS and BRAF genes as predictive biomarkers is mandatory. • Liquid biopsy has acquired growing importance and showed to be reliable when compared to tissue NGS. • Liquid biopsy offers a full overview of the genetic landscape of the disease, overcoming spatial and temporal heterogeneity, when compared to tissue biopsy. • Liquid biopsy can be used to capture the changes in biology of cancer cells under the selective pressure of targeted agents over time. • Using complementary techniques allows to increase the diagnostic power and the biological significance of the results.

Cutaneous melanoma is the most lethal form of skin cancer and its incidence has been increasing in the past 30 years. Although this is completely resectable in most cases, thicker melanoma and those with regional lymph-node involvement are at a high risk of relapse. In recent years, the management of locoregional disease has drastically changed. In particular, in the 8th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), subgroup classification of TNM (tumor–node–metastasis) has been modified, with the addition of the IIID stage. Furthermore, in recent randomized trials, completion lymph node dissection in case of sentinel lymph node biopsy positivity has not been shown to offer any improvement in overall survival versus observation. Consequently, radical dissection has been recommended as the standard treatment, but only in patients with palpable nodal metastases. However, the major novelty in the treatment of locally advanced melanoma has been the introduction of drugs, already used for metastatic disease, that have also shown clinical efficacy in the adjuvant setting. In fact, immunotherapies and, in the case of BRAF V600E/K-mutated melanoma, combination treatment of BRAF and MEK inhibitors have improved recurrence-free survival in these patients. In this paper, we will describe the current management of a patient with radically resectable melanoma and discuss the key points in light of the latest scientific evidence.

Introduction: Cancer immunotherapies with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against immune checkpoints (i.e. CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1) have revolutionized antineoplastic treatments. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) approved for cancer immunotherapy are mAbs anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab), anti-PD-1 (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and cemiplimab), and anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab, avelumab, and durvalumab). Treatment with ICIs can be associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including an increased risk of developing myocarditis. These findings are compatible with the observation that, CTLA-4, PD-1, and PD-L1 pathways play a central role in the modulation of autoimmunity.Areas covered: In this paper, we start from examining the pathogenesis of cardiovascular adverse events from ICIs, and then we focus on risk factors and strategies to prevent and manage this cardiotoxicity.Expert opinion: There is a growing need for a multidisciplinary approach of ICI-associated cardiotoxicity, involving oncologists, cardiologists, and immunologists. Prevention and effective management of ICIs cardiotoxicity starts with an in-depth screening and surveillance strategies of high-risk patients, in order to improve early detection and appropriate management in a personalized approach

Background Despite the advancements in new therapies for colorectal cancer (CRC), chemotherapy still constitutes the mainstay of the medical treatment. For this reason, new strategies to increase the efficacy of chemotherapy are desirable. Poly-ADP-Ribose Polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have shown to increase the activity of DNA damaging chemotherapeutics used in the treatment of CRC, however previous clinical trials failed to validate these results and pointed out dose-limiting toxicities that hamper the use of such combinations in unselected CRC patients. Nevertheless, in these studies little attention was paid to the mutational status of homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes. Methods We tested the combination of the PARPi niraparib with either 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin or irinotecan (SN38) in a panel of 12 molecularly annotated CRC cell lines, encompassing the 4 consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs). Synergism was calculated using the Chou-Talalay method for drug interaction. A correlation between synergism and genetic alterations in genes involved in homologous recombination (HR) repair was performed. We used clonogenic assays, mice xenograft models and patient-derived 3D spheroids to validate the results. The induction of DNA damage was studied by immunofluorescence. Results We showed that human CRC cell lines, as well as patient-derived 3D spheroids, harboring pathogenic ATM mutations are significantly vulnerable to PARPi/chemotherapy combination at low doses, regardless of consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) and microsatellite status. The strongest synergism was shown for the combination of niraparib with irinotecan, and the presence of ATM mutations was associated to a delay in the resolution of double strand breaks (DSBs) through HRR and DNA damage persistence. Conclusions This work demonstrates that a numerically relevant subset of CRCs carrying heterozygous ATM mutations may benefit from the combination treatment with low doses of niraparib and irinotecan, suggesting a new potential approach in the treatment of ATM-mutated CRC, that deserves to be prospectively validated in clinical trials.

INTRODUCTION: There have been significant developments in colorectal cancer (CRC) research over the last few years, with the introduction of new agents that have been prolonged median overall survival of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). These therapies have improved patient outcomes; however, despite significant progress in strategies for cancer treatment, their use is limited by development of resistant mechanism. Almost 30% of patients with refractory mCRC will remain good candidates for further treatment. Regorafenib and TAS-102 are novel antitumor agents for patients with refractory mCRC. However, it is unclear which patients may derive a survival benefit from these drugs in real-life clinical practice.; METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis evaluating safety and efficacy of TAS-102 and regorafenib in a cohort of refractory mCRC patients, in 3 different centers between January 1 2018 and May 31 2020, with the aim of assessing the optimal sequence treatment for these 2 drugs.; RESULTS: One hundred and forty mCRC patients were included in the analysis. Of these patients, 64 received regorafenib and 76 received TAS-102 as first treatment. After progression, in the regorafenib 24 (37%) patients switched to secondary treatment with TAS-102, instead, in the TAS-102 group, among 76 patients, 29 (45%) patients switched to secondary treatment with regorafenib. Disease control was achieved in 8 (12.5%) of 64 patients in the regorafenib group and 17 (22.4%) of 76 patients in the TAS-102 group. In terms of efficacy, the PFS and OS were similar in both treatment groups for primary and secondary treatments. AEs reported in this analysis were mostly consistent with the known safety profiles of regorafenib and TAS-102 in previous clinical trials.; CONCLUSION: The present study is the first one to compare the activity of the two agents in a large cohort of chemo-refractory mCRC patients providing more details about the best sequence, to be incorporated in clinical practice. Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Melanoma is the most lethal form of skin cancer and its incidence is growing worldwide. In the last ten years, the therapeutic scenario of this disease has been revolutionized by the introduction of targeted therapies and immune-checkpoint inhibitors. However, in patients with many lesions and bulky tumors, in which surgery is no longer feasible, there is a need for new treatment options. Here we report, for the first time to our knowledge, a clinical case where a melanoma patient harboring the SMO p.Gln216Arg mutation has been treated with imiquimod, showing a complete and durable response. To better explain this outstanding response to the treatment, we transfected a melanoma cell line (MeWo) with the SMO p.Gln216Arg mutation in order to evaluate its role in response to the imiquimod treatment. Moreover, to better demonstrate that the antitumor activity of imiquimod was due to its role in suppressing the oncogenic SMO signaling pathway, independently of its immune modulating function, an in vivo experiment has been performed. This clinical case opens up a new scenario for the treatment of melanoma patients identifying a new potentially druggable target.

Cutaneous melanoma is considered a rare tumor, although it is one of the most common cancers in young adults and its incidence has risen in the last decades. Targeted therapy, with BRAF and MEK inhibitors, and immunotherapy revolutionized the treatment of metastatic melanoma but there is still a considerable percentage of patients with primary or acquired resistance to these therapies. Recently, oncology researchers directed their attention at the role of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in different types of cancers, including melanoma. lncRNAs are RNA transcripts, initially considered “junk sequences”, that have been proven to have a crucial role in the fine regulation of physiological and pathological processes of different tissues. Furthermore, they are more expressed in tumors than protein-coding genes, constituting perfect candidates either as biomarkers (diagnostic, prognostic, predictive) or as therapeutic targets. In this work, we reviewed all the literature available for lncRNA in melanoma, elucidating all the potential roles in this tumor.

IMPORTANCE: Rechallenge therapy with anti–epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) drugs has been suggested in patients with chemo-refractory RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) after initial response to anti–EGFR-based first-line treatment. The association of treatment with cetuximab plus avelumab with overall survival (OS) may be worthy of investigation in this setting. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of cetuximab rechallenge therapy plus avelumab. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This single-arm, multicenter phase 2 trial enrolled patients from August 2018 to February 2020. Eligible patients with RAS WT mCRC had a complete or partial response to first-line chemotherapy plus anti-EGFR drugs, developed acquired resistance, and failed second-line therapy. Baseline circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and EGFR-S492R mutation analysis was done. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received avelumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks) and cetuximab (400 mg/m(2) and, subsequently, 250 mg/m(2) weekly) until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was OS. Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and safety. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients were enrolled (42 men, 35 women; median age, 63 years); 71 had microsatellite stable tumors (MSS), 3 microsatellite instability-high tumors (MSI-H), 3 unknown. The study met the primary end point, with median OS (mOS) of 11.6 months (95% CI, 8.4-14.8 months). Median PFS (mPFS) was 3.6 months (95% CI, 3.2-4.1 months). Common grade-3 adverse events were cutaneous eruption, 11 (14%), and diarrhea, 3 (4%). For 67 of 77 (87%) patients, baseline analysis of plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and EGFR-S492R variations was feasible. Forty-eight patients had WT disease, whereas 19 had mutations. Patients with RAS/BRAF WT ctDNA had mOS of 17.3 months (95% CI, 12.5-22.0 months) compared with 10.4 months (95% CI, 7.2-13.6 months) in patients with mutated ctDNA (hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% CI, 0.27-0.90; P = .02). The mPFS was 4.1 months (95% CI, 2.9-5.2 months) in RAS/BRAF WT patients compared with 3.0 months (95% CI, 2.6-3.5 months) in patients with mutated ctDNA (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23-0.75; P = .004). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this single-arm phase 2 trial suggest that cetuximab plus avelumab is an active, well tolerated rechallenge therapy in RAS WT mCRC. Plasma ctDNA analysis before treatment may allow selection of patients who could benefit. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04561336

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. About 20% of patients suffer from metastatic disease at diagnosis, while about one-third of patients treated with curative intent relapsed. In these patients, an accurate staging allows to plan a treatment strategy within a multidisciplinary team in order to achieve predefined goals. Patient's clinical features, tumour characteristics and molecular profile (RAS/BRAF and microsatellite instability (MSI) status) should be considered during the treatment choice. Combination of chemotherapy (fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin and irinotecan) plus biological agents (antiepidermal growth factor receptor or antiangiogenic drugs) in addition to surgery, could give a chance of cure in resectable or potentially resectable tumours. However, in never resectable tumours, disease control and prolonging survival should be the goal to achieve simultaneously with control of symptoms. In addition to standard therapies, especially in case of unresectable oligometastatic disease, several local ablative treatment are available. In later lines, when improving quality of life become predominant, regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil demonstrated survival benefit, while re-challenge therapies represent an option only in selected patients. In patients with BRAFV600E-mutant tumour or with MSI, new therapies showed survival gain and probably will be a new piece in the treatment algorithm. © Author (s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

Background The emerging role of next-generation sequencing (NGS) targeted panels is revolutionising our approach to cancer patients, providing information on gene alterations helpful for diagnosis and clinical decision, in a short time and with acceptable costs. Materials and methods In this work, we evaluated the clinical application of FoundationOne CDx test, a hybrid capture-based NGS. This test identifies alterations in 324 genes, tumour mutational burden and genomic signatures as microsatellite instability. The decision to obtain the NGS assay for a particular patient was done according to investigator's choice. Results Overall, 122 tumour specimens were analysed, of which 84 (68.85%) succeeded. The success rate was influenced by type of specimen formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE block vs FFPE slides), by origin of the sample (surgery vs biopsy) and by time of fixation (

Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents a heterogeneous group of dynamic biological phenomena with differing sets of genetic events, accompanying immune responses and influences of exogenous factors, providing a challenge for personalised therapeutic approaches.1 These personalised treatments most often involve kinase inhibitors or monoclonal antibodies that target specific alterations known to drive the proliferation and survival of cancer cells.2 In this scenario, the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family plays a key role in tumour growth and progression, but its use is limited by the presence of pre-existing innate resistance mechanisms or by the ability of cancer cells to acquire resistance to therapy.2 3 RAS mutation status is the only negative predictive biomarker in the management of CRC. Additional molecular features associated with resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in many preclinical studies, including PIK3CA mutation, phosphatase and tensin homologue loss, BRAF mutation, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and secondary EGFR mutations, have been studied, but no one has been incorporated routinely in clinical practice.2 3 Intriguingly, …

BRAF-V600 mutations occur in approximately 50% of patients with metastatic melanoma. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies are both active as first-line treatments in these patients regardless of their mechanisms of action and toxicities. However, an upfront therapeutic strategy is still controversial. In fact, waiting for results of ongoing clinical trials and for new biomarkers, clinicians should base their decision on the clinical characteristics of the patient and on the biological aspects of the tumor. This review provides an overview on BRAF-V600 mutations in melanoma and will discuss their prognostic and clinical significance. Moreover, it will suggest a therapeutic algorithm that can drive therapeutic choice in a first-line setting for BRAF-V600 mutant melanoma patients.

Although melanoma is amenable to early detection, there has been no decline in the mortality rate of this disease and the prognosis of patients with high-risk primary melanoma or with macroscopic nodal involvement remains poor. The best option for patients with higher-risk melanoma is to receive effective adjuvant therapy in order to reduce their chances of recurrence. Multiple systemic therapeutic agents have been tested as adjuvant therapy for melanoma with durable benefits seen only with interferon- to date. More recently ipilimumab at the high dose of 10 mg/kg has shown a significant improvement in terms of Relapse free survival and Overall survival for stage III melanoma patients but at a significant cost in terms of immune-related toxicities. More recently, novel treatment options have emerged. The results from the latest trials with immunotherapy (PD-1 inhibitors) and molecular targeted therapy (BRAF inhibitor + MEK inhibitor) have revolutionized the management of adjuvant treatment for melanoma. As the results from these trials will mature in the next years, a change in the landscape of adjuvant treatment for melanoma is expected, resulting in new challenges in treatment decisions such as optimizing patients’ selection through predictive and prognostic biomarkers, and management of treatment related adverse events, in particular immune related toxicities.

Background: Autoimmune hypophysitis is a frequent immune-related adverse event (irAE) in cancer patients treated with immunecheckpoint inhibitors. Studies seeking anti-pituitary (APA) and anti-hypothalamus (AHA) antibodies in patients treated with anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 are scarce. The aim of this study is to search for APA and AHA and related pituitary dysfunction in patients treated with these agents. Methods:Cross-sectional and preliminary longitudinal studies were conducted at the Medical Oncology Unit and Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases Unit of the University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”. Fifty-four cancer patients on treatments with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 (Group 1) and 50 healthy controls were enrolled for a cross-sectional study, 13 cancer patients (Group 2) were enrolled for our preliminary longitudinal study. APA/AHA titers and changes in biochemical and hormonal profile were evaluated in Group 1, in Group 2, they were evaluated before and after nine weeks from the start of immunotherapy. Results: Patients of Group 1 showed a higher prevalence of APA and AHA than controls: 21 of them had APA, 16 had AHA, and 11 had both autoantibodies. In total, 7 of 13 patients in Group 2 became APA-positive and 3 became AHA-positive after nine weeks of immunotherapy, showing an increase in prolactin and a decrease in ACTH and IGF-1 levels compared with basal values. Conclusions:Anti-pituitary and anti-hypothalamus antibodies seem to play a pivotal role in hypothalamic–pituitary autoimmunity and secondary endocrine-related alterations evoked by anti-PD-1 and PD-L1 antibodies.

Melanoma is a form of skin cancer that is frequently diagnosed at early stages. In most cases, surgical resection is curative. In case of thicker melanomas (> pT1b) without clinical or instrumental evidence of metastasis, a sentinel lymph node biopsy is recommended for staging purposes. If the lymph nodes are the only site of disease (macroscopic or microscopic> 1mm), configuring stage III, the international guidelines recommend the use of adjuvant therapy with checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) or targeted therapies (dabrafenib plus trametinib). These drugs have shown a significant increase in recurrence-free survival, although some doubts and open questions remain. Specifically, none of the available treatments has shown a clear benefit in the overall survival rates, the advantages they give in stage IIIA are not well known, and finally there are still no prospective clinical studies identifying the best approach to continue the therapeutic process in case of relapse. Furthermore, there are new opportunities opening up with the upcoming results of the neoadjuvant trials that could revolutionize the treatment of clinically evident stage III melanoma.

Tumor heterogeneity represents a possible cause of error in detecting predictive genetic alterations on tumor tissue and can be overcome by testing alterations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) using liquid biopsy. We assessed 72 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) using Idylla&trade, Biocartis, a fully automated platform that evaluates the most frequent mutations of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF genes. We correlated the results of liquid biopsy and standard tissue-based next generation sequencing (NGS) analyses to patient clinical features. The overall agreement was 81.94%. Concordance was 85.71% and 96.15% in treatment-na&iuml, ve patients and in the patient subgroup with liver metastases, respectively. In liver metastases positive, treatment-na&iuml, ve patients, sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) were 92.31%, 100% and 100%, respectively. Circulating mutational fraction (CMF) was significantly higher in patients with liver metastases and high carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels. In a subgroup of patients pre-treated with anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) agents, emerging KRAS mutations were evidenced in 33% of cases. Testing RAS/BRAF mutations on plasma using the Idylla&trade, Biocartis platform is feasible and reliable in mCRC patients in clinical practice.

Background Targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) either alone or in combination with chemotherapy is an effective treatment for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, only a small percentage of mCRC patients receive clinical benefits from anti-EGFR therapies, due to the development of resistance mechanisms. In this regard, HER2 has emerged as an actionable target in the treatment of mCRC patients with resistance to anti-EGFR therapy. Methods We have used SW48 and LIM1215 human colon cancer cell lines, quadruple wild-type for KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PI3KCA genes, and their HER2–amplified (LIM1215-HER2 and SW48-HER2) derived cells to perform in vitro and in vivo studies in order to identify novel therapeutic strategies in HER2 gene amplified human colorectal cancer. Results LIM1215-HER2 and SW48-HER2 cells showed over-expression and activation of the HER family receptors and concomitant intracellular downstream signaling including the pro-survival PI3KCA/AKT and the mitogenic RAS/RAF/MEK/MAPK pathways. HER2-amplified cells were treated with several agents including anti-EGFR antibodies (cetuximab, SYM004 and MM151); anti-HER2 (trastuzumab, pertuzumab and lapatinib) inhibitors; anti-HER3 (duligotuzumab) inhibitors; and MEK and PI3KCA inhibitors, such as refametinib and pictilisib, as single agents and in combination. Subsequently, different in vivo experiments have been performed. MEK plus PI3KCA inhibitors treatment determined the best antitumor activity. These results were validated in vivo in HER2-amplified patient derived tumor xenografts from three metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Conclusions These results suggest that combined therapy with MEK and PI3KCA inhibitors could represent a novel and effective treatment option for HER2-amplified colorectal cancer. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13046-019-1230-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) has been shown to acquire RAS and EGFR ectodomain mutations as mechanisms of resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibition (anti-EGFR). After anti-EGFR withdrawal, RAS and EGFR mutant clones lack a growth advantage relative to other clones and decay; however, the kinetics of decay remain unclear. We sought to determine the kinetics of acquired RAS/EGFR mutations after discontinuation of anti-EGFR therapy. Patients and methods We present the post-progression circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) profiles of 135 patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic CRC treated with anti-EGFR who acquired RAS and/or EGFR mutations during therapy. Our validation cohort consisted of an external dataset of 73 patients with a ctDNA profile suggestive of prior anti-EGFR exposure and serial sampling. A separate retrospective cohort of 80 patients was used to evaluate overall response rate and progression free survival during re-challenge therapies. Results Our analysis showed that RAS and EGFR relative mutant allele frequency decays exponentially (r2=0.93 for RAS; r2=0.94 for EGFR) with a cumulative half-life of 4.4 months. We validated our findings using an external dataset of 73 patients with a ctDNA profile suggestive of prior anti-EGFR exposure and serial sampling, confirming exponential decay with an estimated half-life of 4.3 months. A separate retrospective cohort of 80 patients showed that patients had a higher overall response rate during re-challenge therapies after increasing time intervals, as predicted by our model. Conclusion These results provide scientific support for anti-EGFR re-challenge and guide the optimal timing of re-challenge initiation.

3578 Background: Promising antitumor activity of so called rechallenge treatment with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) drugs in patients with RAS wild type (RAS WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been recently reported. Beside the absence of resistance mutations at plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis, no biomarkers of response to anti-EGFR rechallenge strategy have been identified. Methods: We conducted the single arm phase II CAVE mCRC trial to evaluate the combination of cetuximab as rechallenge plus avelumab treatment in 77 RAS WT mCRC patients, with complete (CR) or partial response (PR) to first line chemotherapy plus anti-EGFR drugs, who developed acquired resistance and received a subsequent line of therapy. A post-hoc baseline analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and EGFR-S492R mutations was performed for 67/77 (87%) patients. The correlation of skin toxicity (ST) and other clinical variables with OS, PFS and response rate (RR) was assessed. Results: Cetuximab plus avelumab provided in the intention to treat population (ITT) median overall survival (mOS) of 11.6 months [95% Confidence Interval (CI), 8.4-14.8] and median PFS (mPFS) of 3.6 months (95% CI, 3.2-4.1) with a manageable toxicity profile. Thirty-three (42.9%) patients experienced grade 2-3 ST with mOS of 17.8 months (CI 95% 14.9-20.7), whereas 44 (57.1%) patients with grade 0-1 ST exhibited mOS of 8.2 months (CI 95% 5.6-11), (HR 0.51, CI 95% 0.29-0.89, P = 0.019). mPFS was 4.6 months (CI 95% 3.5-5.8) in patients with grade 2-3 ST, compared to 3.4 months (CI 95% 2.8-4.1) in patients with grade 0-1 ST (HR 0.49, CI 95% 0.3-0.8, P = 0.004). Grade 2-3 ST and baseline RAS/BRAF/EGFR WT ctDNA were the only variables with statistically significant effect on OS both at univariate and multivariate analyses. ST, number of metastatic sites ≤2, surgery of primary tumor and RAS/BRAF/EGFR WT ctDNA were associated with an improvement in PFS only at univariate analysis. In the 33 patients with grade 2-3 ST, 1 (3%) CR, 2 (6.1%) PR and 24 (72.7%) stable disease (SD) were observed, with disease control rate (DCR) of 81.8%. In the 44 patients with grade 0-1 ST 0 CR, 3 (6.8%) PR, 20 (45.5%) SD, with 52.3% DCR were reported. Conclusions: Cetuximab plus avelumab is effective and well tolerated as rechallenge treatment in mCRC. ST is a clinical biomarker for the identification of RAS/BRAF mCRC patients that could benefit from anti-EGFR rechallenge. Clinical trial information: NCT04561336.

3594 Background: Recently, in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the detection of RAS mutations by circulating tumor (ct) DNA has recently emerged as a valid and non-invasive alternative approach, overall showing a high concordance with the standard tissue genotyping, giving information on response to EGFRi treatment and resistant mechanisms. However, RAS mutations may be missed due to low levels of any ctDNA in the blood (false-negative), and it has been difficult to distinguish this from patients without a RAS mutation in the tumor (true-negative). We propose a methodology that can be applied to multi-gene ctDNA testing panels to accurately distinguish true- and false-negative tests. Methods: 357 subjects with tissue and multi-panel ctDNA testing from MD Anderson (MDACC) were used as a training dataset and 295 subjects from Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) dataset as the testing dataset. CtDNA panels contained between 65 and 70 genes, allowing evaluation of tumor ctDNA shedding from variant allele fraction (VAF) levels in the plasma from other genes (such as APC and TP53). Based on the relationship between KRAS and the VAFs of other gene, we established a Bayesian model providing a posterior probability of false negative in the ctDNA test, using thresholds of < 5% (low), 5-15% (medium), and > 15% (high). This model was validated on the MGH database. Results: Across both cohorts, 431 patients were ctDNA wild type for KRAS. Of those, 29 had tissue documenting a KRAS mutation for a false negative rate of 8%. The model provides the posterior probability that a KRAS mutation is indeed present in the tissue given the observed values of allele frequencies for other mutated genes in the plasma. In the validation cohort, a predicted low false negative had no false negatives (0/62, 95% CI 0%-5.8%), while a predicted medium false negative rate was associated with 3% false negative (1/32, 95% CI 0%-16%). In contrast, a high predicted false negative rate was associated with 5% false negative (5/100, 95% CI 1.6%-11%). The results demonstrate the ability of our tool to discriminate between subjects with true negative and false negatives, as a higher proportion of false negatives are observed at higher posterior probabilities. Conclusions: In conclusion, our approach provides increased confidence in KRAS ctDNA mutation testing in clinical practice, thereby facilitating the identification patients who will benefit from EGFR inhibition while reducing the risk of false negative tests. Extension of this methodology to NRAS and BRAF is possible, with clinical application enabled by a freely available online tool.

3514 Background: Colorectal cancers (CRC) lacking RAS MTs treated with EGFRi are thought to evolve by a repetitive process of genetic diversification and clonal evolution. Acquired MTs in KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, MAP2K1, and EGFR are known mechanisms of acquired resistance in the EGFRi refractory population. However, the prevalence of MTs in the first line (1L) setting is not well established as most experience with EGFRi has been beyond the 1L setting. Methods: We analyzed paired plasma samples from RAS/BRAF/EGFRWT mCRC patients (pts) enrolled in 3 large randomized phase 3 trials who had been treated with EGFRi and in whom paired baseline (BL) and time of progression (PRO) plasma samples had been collected for sequencing of ctDNA on a platform optimized for very low allele frequencies (Plasma Select-R™ and Resolution Bio™). Prevalence of MTs at BL and PRO from a 1L study (‘203; FOLFOX ± panitumumab) were compared with 2 studies in the third line setting (3L; ‘007; panitumumab + best supportive care [BSC] vs BSC; and 3L; ‘763; panitumumab vs. cetuximab), to assess the frequency of acquired resistance mutations via ctDNA analysis. Results: For pts with available paired plasma samples (n = 112 for ‘203; n = 89 for ‘007; n = 274 for ‘763), acquisition of at least one KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, MAP2K1, or EGFR MT was significantly less common in post-progression samples in the EGFR containing arms of the 1L ‘203 study compared to the 3L ‘763 and ‘007 studies (6.8% vs 50.4% vs 39.6%, respectively; p < 0.001). In the non EGFR containing arms of the ‘203 and ‘007 study, the rate of acquired MTs was 7.5% and 0%, respectively (p = 1). While this difference in the rate of acquired MTs between the EGFR and non EGFR containing arms was statistically significant for the 3L study (p < 0.001) it was not significant for the 1L study. Further, pts on both 3L studies treated with EGFRi who experienced CR, PR or SD acquired more MTs than those who had PD as best response (53.6% vs 33.3%, respectively; p < 0.001). This relationship was not significant in the 1L setting (7.7% vs 0%; p = 1). Subclonal MTs (rMAF < 25%) in KRAS, NRAS, EGFR, BRAF and MAP2K1 were present at BL in 129 pts (27%). Based on the hypothesis that EGFRi is selecting for rare existing mutated cells in the tumor, we would expect expansion of any preexisting subclones in the BL samples. However, in contrast to expectations, these subclones rarely expanded to become clonal at the time of progression (12.4%). Conclusions: In contrast to expectations, acquired KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, EGFR, or MAP2K1 MTs rarely develop after 1L therapy. While selective pressure appears to increase the frequency of acquired MTs in the 3L setting, preexisting subclonal MTs do not appear to be the dominant source of acquired MTs at progression, implying that there may also be a transient mutational process driving resistance rather than expansion of preexisting clones. These findings have significant implications for ongoing and planned EGFRi rechallenge studies.

110 Background: BRAFV600E mutation identifies mCRC patients with poor prognosis with only little benefit from standard therapy. Analysis from TCGA revealed that 89% of BRAFV600E CRC tumors were associated with a high CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP-H), which may result in epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressor genes, while only 29% of BRAF wild-type tumors are CIMP-H. In this study, we define key pathways regulated by global DNA hypermethylation in the context of BRAFV600E mutation. Methods: We analyzed the TCGA Illumina 450k array methylation datasets and RNA-sequencing datasets for 97 CIMP-H CRC tumors (27 BRAFV600E; 69 BRAF WT) identified by five universal CIMP annotations ( p14, p16, MLH1, MINT1, MINT2, MINT31). We defined differential methylation profile according to BRAF mutation status and calculated Spearman correlation between methylation and gene expression to identify CIMP-H BRAF-associated genes. Next, pathways enriched with CIMP-H BRAFV600E tumors were defined using PANTHER pathway analysis. Additionally, β-catenin IHC were conducted on 145 MD Anderson CRC patient samples and compared by CIMP and BRAF status. Results: BRAF mutation is associated with lower rates of APC mutation as has previously been shown (32%, 82%). We identified 6,097 differentially methylated probes by BRAF mutation status (FDR = 10-4), and as expected, our data suggests a higher methylation profile in BRAFV600E mutated tumors compared to BRAF WT. Intriguingly, CIMP-H BRAF-associated genes showed enrichment in the Wnt-signaling and cadherin signaling pathways ( p< 0.0001 (FDR < 0.0001)). Despite the epigenetic Wnt-signaling, nuclear β-catenin expression (as a measure of Wnt activity) in CIMP-H and BRAF tumors remains lower than for non-CIMP, and BRAF wild-type ( p= 0.0003 for comparison of CIMP). Conclusions: Genes under methylation regulation in the BRAF-mutant context showed enrichment in Wnt-signaling pathway. Since BRAFV600E CRC tumors have a low association with APC mutation, this data suggests role of epigenetic regulation of the Wnt-pathway activation. However, as measured by nuclear β-catenin, Wnt activation in these tumors is not as high as traditional APC-mutated CRC tumors. CIMP-H tumors with BRAFV600E mutation is a unique subset of CRC tumor that have Wnt-pathway activation regulated by epigenetic modifications more than a β-catenin activation.

Immunotherapy has recently become a major treatment modality for several types of solid tumours, achieving remarkable and long-lasting remissions. In metastatic colorectal cancer patients (mCRC), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were found to be effective as treatment for deficient mismatch repair (dMMR)/ microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) tumours and received regulatory approval for this indication. However, mCRC is a complex disease and dMMR/MSI-H tumours represent a minority of the cases; therefore, new strategies are needed to extend the benefits of immunotherapy to a larger population of patients. This review explores the immunological differences between dMMR/MSI-H and proficient mismatch repair (pMMR)/ microsatellite instability low (MSI-L) tumours, focuses on new proposed biomarkers to predict response to immunotherapy and illustrates results reported from the main clinical trials with immunotherapeutic agents in CRC, addressing the most promising approaches being currently developed.

The EPHA2 tyrosine kinase receptor is implicated in tumor progression and targeted therapies resistance. We evaluated EPHA2 as a potential resistance marker to the antiepidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody cetuximab in colorectal cancer. We studied activation of EPHA2 in a panel of human colorectal cancer cell lines sensitive or resistant to anti-EGFR drugs. The in vitro and in vivo effects of ALW-II-41-27 (an EPHA2 inhibitor) and/or cetuximab treatment were tested. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor specimens from 82 RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with FOLFIRI + cetuximab as first-line therapy in the CAPRI-GOIM trial were assessed for EPHA2 expression by immunohistochemistry and correlated with treatment efficacy. EPHA2 was differentially activated in colorectal cancer cell lines. Combined treatment with ALW-II-41-27 plus cetuximab reverted primary and acquired resistance to cetuximab, causing cell growth inhibition, inducing apoptosis and cell-cycle G1–G2 arrest. In tumor xenograft models, upon progression to cetuximab, ALW-II-41-27 addition significantly inhibited tumor growth. EPHA2 protein expression was detected in 55 of 82 tumor samples, frequently expressed in less-differentiated and left-sided tumors. High levels of EPHA2 significantly correlated with worse progression-free survival [8.6 months; confidence interval (CI) 95%, 6.4–10.8; vs. 12.3 months; CI 95%, 10.4–14.2; P = 0.03] and with increased progression rate (29% vs. 9%, P = 0.02). A specific EPHA2 inhibitor reverts in vitro and in vivo primary and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy. EPHA2 levels are significantly associated with worse outcome in patients treated with FOLFIRI + cetuximab. These results highlight EPHA2 as a potential therapeutic target in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Preclinical models, which are able to recapitulate the biology and pathology of the original individual cancer, are needed to better investigate mechanisms of response and resistance to anticancer therapies. In this respect, novel in vitro models for metastatic colorectal cancer could be of high value. Clin Cancer Res; 24(4); 727–9. ©2017 AACR. See related article by Luraghi et al., p. 807

Cetuximab and panitumumab, monoclonal antibodies direct against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are a therapeutic option for mCRC patients wild type for KRAS and NRAS genes. However, only a subset of mCRC patients receives clinical benefit from these therapies due to the development of resistance mechanisms. HER2 gene amplification or HER2 activating mutations have been implicated as resistance mechanisms to anti-EGFR therapies. However, little is known about the role of HER2 in cancer resistance to anti-EGFR antibodies.

Purpose: The use of cetuximab in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer is limited by development of resistance. Experimental Design: We have investigated in three models of highly epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)–dependent colorectal cancer xenografts, the effect of maintenance therapy with different kinase inhibitors alone or in combination with cetuximab, after cytotoxic treatment induction with irinotecan plus cetuximab. Results: SW48, LIM 1215, and GEO colorectal cancer cell lines were engrafted into nude mice and treated for 3 weeks with irinotecan and/or cetuximab. The combined treatment induced a significant reduction of tumor size. A subsequent experiment was performed in all three xenograft models in which after an induction treatment with irinotecan plus cetuximab, mice were randomly assigned to one of the following treatments: control, cetuximab, regorafenib, a selective PIK3CA inhibitor (PIK3CAi), a selective MEK inhibitor (MEKi), and/or the combination of each inhibitor with cetuximab. The cetuximab plus MEKi treatment determined the best antitumor activity with suppression of tumor growth. This effect was prolonged for 13 to 15 weeks after cessation of therapy and was accompanied by prolonged survival. Antitumor activity was accompanied by inhibition of the MAPK and MEK pathways. Moreover, in the cetuximab plus MEKi-treated SW48 xenograft group, KRAS mutations as a mechanism of acquired resistance were detected in 25% of cases compared with 75% KRAS mutations in the MEKi-treated group. Conclusions: A possible strategy to prevent and/or overcome resistance to anti-EGFR inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer is a maintenance therapy with cetuximab plus MEKi after an initial treatment with irinotecan plus cetuximab. Clin Cancer Res; 21(18); 4153–64. ©2015 AACR.

Recent developments in genomic technologies have led an unprecedented view of the profound molecular complexity of colorectal cancer (CRC) and its evolution. The genomic landscape of CRC is characterized by a high heterogeneous landscape both at an intratumoral and at an inter-metastatic and intrametastatic level. In the era of personalized cancer medicine, the challenge is the definition of predictive biomarkers in respect of a such complex scenario. Despite the robust differences occurring between primary tumor and metastatic sites, the biomarkers currently validated in clinical practice have high concordance. The purpose of this review is to explore differences existing in genetic landscape of primary tumor and metastatic sites in CRC, in order to assess concordance and discordance rates of biologic events between different tumor lesions in CRC.

// Stefania Napolitano 1 , Giulia Martini 1 , Erika Martinelli 1 , Carminia Maria Della Corte 1 , Floriana Morgillo 1 , Valentina Belli 1 , Claudia Cardone 1 , Nunzia Matrone 1 , Fortunato Ciardiello 1 and Teresa Troiani 1 1 Oncologia Medica, Dipartimento di Internistica Clinica e Sperimentale “F. Magrassi”, Universita degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy Correspondence to: Teresa Troiani, email: teresa.troiani@unicampania.it Keywords: MM151, cetuximab, acquired resistance, epidermal growth factor receptor, metastatic colorectal cancer Received: April 13, 2017 Accepted: June 17, 2017 Published: August 02, 2017 ABSTRACT Purpose: We investigated the effect of triple monoclonal antibody inhibition of EGFR to overcome acquired resistance to first generation of anti-EGFR inhibitors. Experimental design: MM151 is a mixture of three different monoclonal IgG1 antibodies directed toward three different, non-overlapping, epitopes of the EGFR. We performed an in vivo study by using human CRC cell lines (SW48, LIM 1215 and CACO2) which are sensitive to EGFR inhibitors, in order to evaluate the activity of MM151 as compared to standard anti-EGFR mAbs, such as cetuximab, as single agent or in a sequential strategy of combination MM151 with irinotecan (induction therapy) followed by MM151 with a selective MEK1/2 inhibitor (MEKi) (maintenance therapy). Furthermore, the ability of MM151 to overcome acquired resistance to cetuximab has been also evaluated in cetuximab-refractory CRC models. Results: MM151 shown stronger antitumor activity as compared to cetuximab. The maintenance treatment with MM151 plus MEKi resulted the most effective therapeutic modality. In fact, this combination caused an almost complete suppression of tumor growth in SW48, LIM 1215 and CACO2 xenografts model at 30 week. Moreover, in this treatment group, mice with no evidence of tumor were more than double as compared to single agent treated mice. Its superior activity has also been demonstrated, in cetuximab-refractory CRC models. Conclusions: These results provide experimental evidence that more efficient and complete EGFR blockade may determine better antitumor activity and could contribute to prevent and/or overcome acquired resistance to EGFR inhibitors.

In the last two decades, great efforts have been made in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) due to the approval of new target agents for cytotoxic drugs. Unfortunately, a large percentage of patients present with metastasis at the time of diagnosis or relapse after a few months. The complex molecular heterogeneity of this disease is not completely understood; to date, there is a lack of predictive biomarkers that can be used to select subsets of patients who may respond to target drugs. Only the RAS -mutation status is used to predict resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents in patients with mCRC. In this review, we describe approved targeted therapies for the management of metastatic mCRC and discuss new candidate targets on the horizon.

// Stefania Napolitano 1 , Giulia Martini 1 , Erika Martinelli 1 , Valentina Belli 1 , Alessia Parascandolo 2 , Mikko O. Laukkanen 2 , Vincenzo Sforza 1 , Floriana Morgillo 1 , Davide Ciardiello 1 , Fortunato Ciardiello 1 and Teresa Troiani 1 1 Oncologia Medica, Dipartimento Medico-Chirurgico di Internistica Clinica e Sperimentale “F. Magrassi e A. Lanzara”, Universita degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy 2 IRCCS SDN, Via Gianturco, 80143 Naples, Italy Correspondence to: Teresa Troiani, email: tessy75@inwind.it Fortunato Ciardiello, email: fortunato.ciardiello@unina2.it Keywords: SYM004, cetuximab, acquired resistance, MET, metastatic colorectal cancer Received: December 05, 2016 Accepted: February 14, 2017 Published: June 27, 2017 ABSTRACT Purpose: Cetuximab and panitumumab have an effective therapeutic response in a subset of RAS Wild-Type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs). Despite molecular-driven selection, all patients do not respond to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors and the onset of secondary resistance limits their clinical benefit. Experimental Design: We tested, in vitro and in vivo , the effect of SYM004, a 1:1 mixture of two recombinant human-mouse chimeric monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed against non-overlapping epitopes of the EGFR, on CRC models with acquired resistance to cetuximab. Results: SYM004 showed a potent growth inhibitory effect in CRC cell lines with acquired resistance to cetuximab and MET activation. SYM004 treatment determined a significant induction of apoptosis and a strong inhibition of MET, AKT and MAPK phosphorilation in these resistant models. The data may further suggest SYM004 -driven induced internalization and degradation of the antibody-receptor complex, which prevents cross-interaction between EGFR and MET even in the presence of TGFα. Moreover, in vivo xenograft studies demonstrated that SYM004 has stronger antitumor activity than cetuximab in CRC models. Importantly, in the current work we observed a response to therapy in all cetuximab resistant tumors mice treated with SYM004. More importantly, four out of seven mice continue to respond to SYM004 after 30 weeks of treatment underling the prolonged effect of the drug. Conclusion: These results suggest that the treatment with SYM004 could be a strategy to overcome acquired resistance to first generation of anti-EGFR therapies in mCRC as a result of MET activation.

Background TAS-102 improves overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory to standard treatments. However, predictive biomarkers of efficacy are currently lacking. Patients and methods We treated a cohort of 43 chemorefractory mCRC patients treated with TAS-102, in a single institution expanded access, compassionate use programme. We stratified patients in two groups according to number of cycles received (

Please click here to see linked paper Background To investigate the potential predictors of response to regorafenib, in chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with long-term efficacy from regorafenib treatment. Methods Retrospective, single institution analysis of patients with chemorefractory mCRC treated with regorafenib, in clinical practice setting. 123 patients were treated and stratified into two groups according to number of cycles received ( Results A good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, a lung limited metastatic disease and a long history of metastatic disease were significantly associated with better OS and PFS from treatment with regorafenib. Mutations were mostly found in TP53 , KRAS and PIK3CA as well as in NRAS , ERBB2, SMAD4 and PTEN genes. BCL2L1, ERBB2, KRAS, MYC, GAS6 gene amplifications were detected as well as ALK rearrangement. No significant correlation between molecular alterations and response to regorafenib was observed. However, HER2 gene alterations were found in three poor responder patients, suggesting a potential role in regorafenib resistance. Conversely, GAS6 amplification and SMAD4 mutation, detected in two long responder patients, might suggest a role of epithelial–mesenchymal transition phenotype in regorafenib response. Conclusion A subgroup of long responder patients to regorafenib treatment was identified and a comprehensive molecular characterisation was performed; however, further research efforts are essential to confirm our data.

SUMMARY The prognosis of patients harboring metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) remains poor despite therapeutic improvements obtained in recent years thanks to new biologic agents. A resistance mechanism limits the effectiveness of current cancer therapies to treat metastatic CRC patients. The identification of mechanisms of drug resistance may highlight new biomarkers useful to predict the clinical outcome or the likely responsiveness to pharmacological treatment of those metastatic CRC patients who cannot benefit from current therapeutic regimen. Moreover, the recognition of panels of biomarkers may suggest new strategies to overcome resistance by rational drug design and combination treatment. This review discusses CRC biomarkers, focusing initially on the most recent findings about the known ones, and mostly about the novel protagonists of this complex scenario.

To update the melanoma staging system of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) a large database was assembled comprising >46,000 patients from 10 centers worldwide with stages I, II, and III melanoma diagnosed since 1998. Based on analyses of this new database, the existing seventh edition AJCC stage IV database, and contemporary clinical trial data, the AJCC Melanoma Expert Panel introduced several important changes to the Tumor, Nodes, Metastasis (TNM) classification and stage grouping criteria. Key changes in the eighth edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual include: 1) tumor thickness measurements to be recorded to the nearest 0.1 mm, not 0.01 mm; 2) definitions of T1a and T1b are revised (T1a

Background Molecular mechanisms driving acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapies in metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) are complex but generally involve the activation of the downstream RAS-RAF-MEK-MAPK pathway. Methods In order to understand the mechanism underlying MEK inhibitor (MEKi) resistance, we generated three different MEKi resistant models, two all RAS WT (SW48-MR and LIM1215-MR) and one mutated in RAS (HCT116-MR). Results These models showed features related to the gene signature of Colorectal Cancer CMS4 with upregulation of immune pathway as confirmed by Microarray and Western blot analysis. In particular, moving forward the MEKi phenotype we assisted to the loss of epithelial features and acquisition of mesenchymal markers and morphology. Moreover, this change in the morphology is accompanied by up-regulation of PD-L1 expression and activation of EGFR and its downstream pathway, independently of cell line status mutation. To extend these in vitro findings, we performed an in vivo study using MC38 and CT26 MEKi resistant syngeneic models that we have previously generated. Combined treatment of MEKi, EGFR inhibitor (EGFRi) and PD-L1inhibitor (PD-L1i) resulted in a marked inhibition of tumor growth in both MC38–MR and CT26-MR xenograft model. Conclusions These results suggest a strategy to potentially overcome immunotherapy resistance in CMS4-like tumors and to improve the efficacy of MEK inhibition by co-treatment with other agents providing an additional therapeutic strategy via modulation of host immune responses. Legal entity responsible for the study The authors. Funding Has not received any funding. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Background Historically, immunotherapies have been tested in syngeneic mouse models and until now only limited CRC syngeneic cells are available. Animal models with functioning human immune systems are critically needed to more accurately evaluate checkpoint blockers delivery, therapeutic response, and to better define biomarker expression in the presence of a competent immune system. Methods To better address the efficacy of immune checkpoint therapy specifically in relation to presence of a BRAFmutation, we developed a novel platform for the generation of somatic mosaic models of CRC enabling (i) high-throughput generation of genetically complex syngeneic models of cancer, (ii) tracing studies through fluorescence reporters. Results Cdx2Cre/+ mice, expressing the Cre recombinaseunder the control of a human Cdx2 promoter/enhancer sequence have been crossed with the R26LSL-Cas9-Gfp strain to generate models allowing for tissue specific activation of Cas9 and Gfpreporter only in CDX2 positive cells. This strain has been crossed with BRAFFSF-V600E mice to generate the final model. 6-8 weeks old mice have then been transduced with AAV constructs expressing the FLPO recombinasethat can be activated by Cre recombinase and sgRNAs targeting APC, TP53, MLH1, MSH2and ARID1Aalone or combined, in order to model MSI CRC (APC-TP53-MLH1and ARID1A-MLH1conditional mosaic knock-outs) and MSS CRC (APC-TP53 conditional mosaic knock-out). Viral particles have been surgically delivered via subserosal cecal injection and mice monitored for tumor formation by IVIS imaging. 35 mice injected with 3 combinations of tumor suppressors provide a diverse immunology repetoire. Cell lines isolated from genetically modified mice will provide a physiologic relevant and feasible means to study the mechanisms of response and resistance to immunotherapies and to understand biological and molecular differences between BRAFmutated MSI and MSS tumors. Conclusions This project focuses on the identification and characterization of the functional drivers of CMS1CRC tumors leveraging in vivomosaic genome editing technologies and functional genetic labeling of malignant sub-populations emerging during disease progression and in response to therapy. Legal entity responsible for the study The authors. Funding MD Anderson Cancer Center. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Background Anti-PD-1 antibodies represent nowadays a first-choice therapy for metastatic melanoma patients. Despite impressive results in terms of PFS and OS, a proportion of patients does not respond to anti-PD-1 therapy with an overall poor prognosis. Identification of predictive biomarkers is considered an important unmet clinical need to avoid expensive and potentially harmful drugs in patients who will not respond to them. In the last years, many studies have evaluated the role of cytokines on both blood and tissue samples as predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy, with encouraging results. Methods Blood samples from 18 patients with metastatic melanoma treated with anti-PD-1 antibodies as first line therapy were collected at baseline. 8 patients were classified as non-responders (best response: PD excluding pseudo-progression with median PFS of 2 months) and 10 patients as responders (best response: PR or CR, with median PFS of 17 months). mRNA expression levels of the main pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines were evaluated by Real time quantitative PCR in PBMCs obtained from baseline blood samples. Unpaired two-tailed t-test was used for statistical analysis. Results IFN-γ mRNA expression levels were higher in responder patients (p 0.05). Combining data for each patient, we noticed a correlation between higher levels of IFN-γ and lower levels of IL-10 for responders and vice versa. Starting from these findings, we observed that the IFN-γ/IL-10 ratio was higher (median: 43,3 vs 5,2) in responders (p Conclusions Our data suggest an interesting correlation between IFN-γ/IL-10 ratio and response to anti-PD-1 therapy in melanoma patients. This correlation seems to be stronger than using IFN-γ expression levels alone probably because of the influence of anti-inflammatory cytokines. Since this is an exploratory and retrospective analysis of 18 patients, a larger population should be tested to validate our results. Legal entity responsible for the study Dipartimento di Medicina di Precisione, Universita degli studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli. Funding Has not received any funding. Disclosure F. Ciardiello: Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Servier; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Cellgene; Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): Amgen; Research grant / Funding (institution): Takeda. T. Troiani: Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution): Amgen; Research grant / Funding (institution): Servier; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Introduction: Fluoropyrimidines such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and its orally active prodrug, capecitabine, are widely used in the treatment of gastrointestinal cancer, including colorectal cancer. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) plays an important role in the 5-FU metabolism. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene (DPYD) is a highly polymorphic gene with several hundreds of reported genetic variants and DPD activity levels vary considerably among individuals, with different 5-FU-related efficacy and toxicity. About 5% of the population is deficient in DPD enzyme activity. The most well studied DPYD variant is the IVS14+1G>A, also known as DPYD ∗2A. In this report, we present a case of a patient with a double heterozygote DPYD variant (DPYD activity score: 0,5 according to Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium) who experienced a severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity resolved without any consequence. Patient concerns: A 46-years-old Caucasian man with diagnosis of left colon adenocarcinoma underwent left hemicolectomy on July 2017: pT3 G3 N1c M0. According to the disease stage, he started an adjuvant therapy with XELOX using capecitabine at 50% of total dose, because of his DPYD IVS14+1G>A variant, detected before the treatment. DIAGNOSIS: After few days, despite of this dose reduction, he experienced life-threatening adverse events such as mucositis G3, diarrhea G3, neutropenia G4, thrombocytopenia G4, and hyperbilirubinemia G3 according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 5.0. Interventions: As first, we set up an intensive rehydration therapy, antibiotic and antifungal prophylaxis, Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factors, and supportive blood transfusions. Additional genetic tests revealed a double heterozygote variant of DPYD gene (DPYD IVS14+1G>A and 2846A>T) which is a very rare situation and only 3 cases are described in literature, all of them concluded with patient's death. Outcomes: After 3 weeks of intensive therapy, the patient was fully recovered. Furthermore, all the whole-body CT scans performed since discharge from the hospital until now, have confirmed no evidence of disease. Conclusions: Recent studies demonstrated that screening strategy for the most common DPYD variants allowed for avoiding toxicities and saving money. This report underlines the importance of genotyping DPYD before treatment and emphasizes the role of genotype-guided dose individualization.

Background. Thrombotic microangiopathies (TMA) are relatively rare but severe disorders characterised by non-immune haemolytic anaemia, thrombocytopaenia and organ failure. In patients with metastatic cancer, sporadic forms of TMA can be triggered by chemotherapeutic agents or can occur as complication of malignancy itself or of infections. Case report. Hereby, we report a case of a patient diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer who experienced an atypical haemolytic-uraemic syndrome (aHUS) during chemotherapy treatment with FOLFOX6 scheme. The use of eculizumab led to prompt recovery of laboratory parameters that was maintained despite treatment discontinuation due to appearance of pneumonia infectious. Additionally, genetic analyses revealed the presence in heterozygosis of CFH gene polymorphisms associated with aHUS. Conclusion. This case emphasises the importance of considering TMA as a possible diagnosis in patients with cancer presenting with haemolytic non-immune mediate anaemia and thrombocytopaenia associated with worsening of renal function. Prompt diagnosis is crucial for the requirement of its specific treatment that can impact on long-term outcome and prognosis.

The prognosis of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remain poor despite the impressive improvement of treatments observed over the last 20 years that led to an increase in median overall survival from 6 mo, with the only best supportive care, to approximately 30 mo with the introduction of active chemotherapy drugs and targeted agents. The monoclonal antibodies (moAbs) cetuximab and panitumumab, directed against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), undoubtedly represent a major step forward in the treatment of mCRC, given the relevant efficacy in terms of progression-free survival, overall survival, response rate, and quality of life observed in several phase III clinical trials among different lines of treatment. However, the anti-EGFR moAbs were shown only to be effective in a subset of patients. For instance, KRAS and NRAS mutations have been identified as biomarkers of resistance to these drugs, improving the selection of patients who might derive a benefit from these treatments. Nevertheless, several other alterations might affect the response to these drugs, and unfortunately, even the responders eventually become resistant by developing secondary (or acquired) resistance in approximately 13-18 mo. Several studies highlighted that the landscape of responsible alterations of both primary and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR drugs biochemically converge into MEK-ERK and PIK3CA-AKT pathways. In this review, we describe the currently known mechanisms of primary and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR moAbs together with the various strategies evaluated to prevent, overcame or revert them.