Search

Objectives To evaluate the risk of contracting severe COVID‐19, defined as COVID‐19 specific intensive care unit (ICU) admission or death, for patients undergoing urological surgery during the epidemic. To define consequences of receiving surgery for COVID‐19 patients. Patients and Methods This is a multicenter observational cohort study. Every patient receiving a urological procedure in Paris academic urological centers during the 4 initial weeks of surgical restrictions were included. Their status was updated minimum 3 weeks after the procedure. The main outcomes were the COVID‐19 specific ICU admission and death. Statistics were mostly descriptive. The Post‐operative COVID‐19 confirmed group was compared with non‐COVID patients using Chi‐square tests for categorical and Wilcoxon test tests for continuous variables. Results During the 4‐week period, 552 patients received surgery within 8 centers. At follow‐up, 57 (10%) patients were lost. Among the 11 preoperative COVID‐19 cases, one remained in ICU, no new admission, and no death. For the non‐COVID patients, 57 (12%) developed COVID‐related symptoms; only one case (0.2%) required COVID‐19 specific ICU and 3 (0.6%) patients died of COVID‐19 after surgery. Conclusions Performing urological surgery during the COVID‐19 epidemic peak has a limited impact on ICU admissions but presents a real (0.6%) risk of specific mortality. Surgical activities should be maintained according to this risk.

To date, transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) remains the gold standard of staging urothelial cancer of the bladder and treating non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). The primary goal of the procedure includes a proper diagnosis, correct staging, and removal all lesions. Herein, we discuss major contemporary surgical and technical aspects of including en bloc resection, bipolar and laser resection as well as quality control of TURBT.

International audience; Introduction: As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic in France, all non-emergency surgical activity has been cancelled since March 12, 2020. In order to anticipate the reinstatement of delayed interventions, surgical activity reduction analysis is essential. The objective of this study was to evaluate the reduction of urological surgery in adult during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to 2019.Material: The data regarding urological procedures realized in the 8 academic urological departments of Parisians centres (AP-HP) were compared over two similar periods (14-29 March 2019 and 12-27 March 2020) using the centralized surgical planning software shared by these centres. Procedure title, type of surgery and outpatient ratio were collected. The interventions were sorted into 16 major families of urological interventions.Results: Overall, a 55% decrease was observed concerning urological procedures over the same period between 2019 and 2020 (995 and 444 procedures respectively). Oncology activity and emergencies decreased by 31% and 44%. The number of kidney transplantations decreased from 39 to 3 (-92%). Functional, andrological and genital surgical procedures were the most impacted among the non-oncological procedures (-85%, -81% and -71%, respectively). Approximatively, 1033 hours of surgery have been delayed during this 16-day period.Conclusion: Lockdown and postponement of non-urgent scheduled urological procedures decisions has led to a drastic decrease in surgical activity in AP-HP. Isolated kidney transplantation has been stopped (national statement). Urologists must anticipate for lockdown exit in order to catch-up delayed surgeries.Level of evidence: 3.; IntroductionEn conséquence de la pandémie de COVID-19 en France, toute activité chirurgicale non urgente a dû être annulée à partir du 12 mars 2020. Afin d’anticiper la reprise des interventions décalées, une quantification de la réduction d’activité est nécessaire. L’objectif de l’étude était d’évaluer comparativement à 2019 la réduction d’activité chirurgicale urologique adulte pendant la pandémie de COVID-19.Matériel et méthodesNous avons comparé le nombre d’interventions urologiques pratiquées dans les 8 services universitaires d’urologie de l’Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (AP–HP) sur deux périodes comparables (14–29 mars 2019 et 12–27 mars 2020) à l’aide du logiciel de planification opératoire et du PMSI partagé par ces centres. L’intitulé d’intervention et le type de chirurgie ont été collectés et regroupées en 16 catégories.RésultatsUne baisse de l’activité globale à l’AP–HP en urologie de 55 % entre 2019 et 2020 (995 et 444 interventions respectivement) a été constatée sur les 8 services. L’activité oncologique et les urgences ont diminué de 31 % et 44 %. L’activité de transplantation rénale, la chirurgie fonctionnelle et andrologique ont subi les plus fortes baisses d’activité par les interventions non oncologiques (−92 %, −85 % et −81 %, respectivement). Environ 1033 heures d’intervention devront être reprogrammées pour rattraper le programme opératoire annulé.ConclusionLe confinement et le report des interventions chirurgicales « non urgentes » ont entraîné une diminution drastique de l’activité chirurgicale au sein de l’AP–HP. Pendant cette période, les urologues ont été sollicités pour d’autres tâches mais doivent désormais s’atteler à organiser la période de reprise d’activité pour éviter une crise organisationnelle en urologique.Niveau de preuve3.

Summary Objective Provide guidelines for practical usage of botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) for refractory idiopathic overactive bladder management. Patients and methods Guidelines using formalized consensus guidelines method. These guidelines have been validated by a group of 13 experts quoting proposals, subsequently reviewed by an independent group of experts. Results In the case of patients with urinary tract infection, it must be treated and injection postponed. Before proposing an injection, it is recommended to ensure the feasibility and acceptability of self-catheterisation by patient. The injection can be performed after local anesthesia of the bladder and urethra (lidocaine), supplemented where necessary by nitrous oxide inhalation and sometimes under general anesthesia. Injection is performed in the operating room or endoscopy suite. The bladder should not be too filled (increased risk of perforation). Treatment should be applied in 10 to 20 injections of 0.5 to 1 mL homogeneously distributed in the bladder at a distance from the urethral orifices. It is not recommended to leave a urinary catheter in place except in cases of severe hematuria. The patient should be monitored until resumption of micturition. After the first injection, an appointment must be scheduled within 3 months (micturition diary, uroflowmetry, measurement of residual urine and urine culture). Performance of self-catheterisation should be questioned in the case of a symptomatic post-void residual and/or a residue > 200 mL. A new injection may be considered when the clinical benefit of the previous injection diminishes (between 6 and 9 months). A period of three months must elapse between each injection. Conclusions Implementation of these guidelines may promote best practice usage of BoNTA with optimal risk/benefit ratio.

To evaluate retrospectively the efficacy of adjuvant radiation therapy (ART) in patients with T1–T2 prostate cancer (CaP) in whom extracapsular cancer (pT3) was detected after radical prostatectomy (RP), together with biochemical failure characterized by a recurrent level of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA)>0.1 ng/mL. Twenty-two patients with T1–T2 CaP treated by RP who subsequently were found to have pT3 CaP with (13) or without (9) positive surgical margins and/or seminal vesicle invasion, exhibited biochemical failure characterized by a recurrent level of serum PSA, 2–40 (mean: 25) months after RP and were treated with ART (65 Gy). Bone and CT scans were negative in every patient, 15 of whom were submitted to TRUS biopsy (Bx) of the anastomosis (resection site), which was positive in 8. Patients were followed up for between 6 and 60 (mean: 32.5) months. Transient side effects (urgency, proctitis, diarrhea) were experienced by 9 patients after ART. A decrease in serum PSA was observed in 19 patients; however, only 14 of these achieved an undetectable level (

RésuméObjectifsDéfinir des recommandations pour l’utilisation pratique de la toxine botulinique de type A (BoNTA) dans l’hyperactivité vésicale réfractaire idiopathique (HAVRI).MéthodeÉlaboration de recommandations de bonne pratique par consensus formalisé, validées par un groupe de 13 experts puis par un groupe de lecture indépendant.RésultatsEn cas d’infection urinaire celle-ci doit être traitée et l’injection reportée. Avant l’injection, il est recommandé de s’assurer de la faisabilité et de l’acceptabilité de l’auto-sondage. L’injection peut être réalisée après une anesthésie locale urétro-vésicale (lidocaïne), éventuellement complétée par l’inhalation de protoxyde d’azote et parfois sous anesthésie générale. L’injection sera réalisée au bloc opératoire ou en salle d’endoscopie. La vessie ne doit pas être trop remplie (risque de perforation). Le traitement doit être appliqué en 10 à 20 injections de 0,5 à 1mL réparties de manière homogène dans la vessie en restant à distance des méats urétéraux. Il n’est pas recommandé de laisser en place une sonde vésicale sauf en cas d’hématurie importante. Le patient doit être surveillé jusqu’à la reprise mictionnelle. Une note d’information sur les effets indésirables éventuels doit lui être remise à sa sortie. Une consultation doit être prévue 3 mois après la première injection (calendrier mictionnel, débitmétrie, résidu post-mictionnel et examen cytobactériologique des urines). Un résidu >200mL et/ou symptomatique doit faire discuter des auto-sondages. Une nouvelle injection pourra être envisagée lorsque le bénéfice clinique de la précédente s’estompe (entre 6 et 9 mois).ConclusionsLe respect de ces recommandations devrait permettre une utilisation optimale de la BoNTA.Niveau de preuve3.SummaryObjectivesProvide guidelines for practical usage of botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) for refractory idiopathic Overactive Bladder management.Patients and methodsGuidelines using formalized consensus guidelines method. These guidelines have been validated by a group of 13 experts quoting proposals, subsequently reviewed by an independent group of experts.ResultsIn the case of patients with urinary tract infection, it must be treated and injection postponed. Before proposing an injection, it is recommended to ensure the feasibility and acceptability of self-catheterisation by patient. The injection can be performed after local anesthesia of the bladder and urethra (lidocaine), supplemented where necessary by nitrous oxide inhalation and sometimes under general anesthesia. Injection is performed in the operating room or endoscopy suite. The bladder should not be too filled (increased risk of perforation). Treatment should be applied in 10 to 20 injections of 0.5 to 1mL homogeneously distributed in the bladder at a distance from the urethral orifices. It is not recommended to leave a urinary catheter in place except in cases of severe hematuria. The patient should be monitored until resumption of micturition. After the first injection, an appointment must be scheduled within 3 months (micturition diary, uroflowmetry, measurement of residual urine and urine culture). Performance of self-catheterisation should be questioned in the case of a symptomatic post-void residual and/or a residue>200mL. A new injection may be considered when the clinical benefit of the previous injection diminishes (between 6 and 9 months). A period of three months must elapse between each injection.ConclusionsImplementation of these guidelines may promote best practice usage of BoNTA with optimal risk/benefit ratio.

Seventy patients (mean age: 66.5 69 y) were submitted to TRUS-guided prostate biopsies for increased prostate speci®c antigen (PSA> 4 ng=ml). Mean PSA was 10.5 10.9 ng=ml. In this new protocol, ®ve biopsies were performed in each lobe. Beside the three standard biopsies (taken at 45 angle), two additional biopsies (one at the base and one at the mid-lobe) were taken at a 30 angle sampling the peripheral zone. An additional peripheral biopsy was taken at the apex if there was a prostate volume> 50 cm. This biopsy protocol took place on an outpatient basis. Results