This paper addresses the plan II of this Project entitled CURRICULUM AND EVALUTION: contemporary discourses (Discourses about curriculum and the concepts evaluation in I and II segments of Municipal Elementary Education of João Pessoa/PB) conducted by PIBIC/PIVIC program realized in the period of 2014/2015, with the objective of analysis of the meanings of evaluation and how these are articulated with the meanings of curriculum in public schools in João Pessoa. For this purpose and aiming to achieve the proposed objective, this research approaches to curriculum field's authors, as Pereira (2009a, b) who takes on the curriculum as a network of meanings, as well as other authors of this study field: Moreira and Candau (2007), Silva (2013). As regards the evaluation is grounded in Fernandes and Freitas (2007), Mainardes (2010), Esteban (2010). The survey takes quantitative and qualitative characteristics, field, bibliographical, documentary, exploratory and explanatory according to Gonçalves (2003) and Marconi and Lakatos (2003). To understand the meanings of evaluation in documents examined, we used the corpus linguistics, based on studies of Sardinha (2000, 2009, 2006) and to assist in corpus linguistics, it was used WordSmith Tool 6 program. To understand the meanings, used Speech's Theory of Laclau (2005) and Laclau and Mouffe (2004) and studies of authors that are based on this theory, as Pereira (2009a, 2009b), Mendonça (2009), Ferreira (2011), among others. The documents analyzed were the Law of Directives and Bases of Education, National Curriculum Guidelines for Elementary Education, National Curriculum Parameters, João Pessoa's Municipal Education Plan, PPP of local schools of João Pessoa/PB and interviews with teachers. Previous work were used in order to know the curriculum meanings in schools in the municipal school system of João Pessoa and performed the analysis of overlapping with the essence of curriculum and evaluation in that it was perceived to be a relationship between these categories, in the conception that both can be considered empty significant in the light of Speech's Theory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]