Search

Background and Purpose: Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients experiencing anatomical changes during their radiotherapy (RT) course may benefit from adaptive RT (ART). We investigated the sensitivity of an electronic portal imaging device (EPID)-based in-vivo dosimetry (EIVD) system to detect patients that require ART and identified its limitations., Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted for 182 HNC patients: laryngeal cancer without elective lymph nodes (group A), postoperative RT (group B) and primary RT including elective lymph nodes (group C). The effect of anatomical changes on the dose distribution and volumetric changes was quantified. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to obtain the optimal cut-off value for the gamma passing rate (%GP) with a dose difference of 3% and a distance to agreement of 3 mm., Results: Fifty HNC patients receiving ART were analyzed: 1 in group A, 10 in group B and 39 in group C. Failed fractions (FFs) occurred in 1/1, 6/10 and 23/39 cases before ART in group A, B and C respectively. In the four cases in group B without FFs, only minor dosimetric changes were observed. One of the cases in group C without FFs had significant dosimetric changes (false negative). Three cases received ART because of clinical reasons that cannot be detected by EIVD. The optimal cut-off value for the %GP was 95%/95.2% for old/new generation machines respectively., Conclusion: EIVD combined with 3D imaging techniques can be synergistic in the detection of anatomical changes in HNC patients who benefit from ART., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: The authors have an on-going scientific collaboration with Sun Nuclear Corporation., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To update the 2011 ESTRO-EFOMP core curriculum (CC) for education and training of medical physics experts (MPE)s working in radiotherapy (RT), in line with recent EU guidelines, and to provide a framework for European countries to develop their own curriculum., Material and Methods: Since September 2019, 27 European MPEs representing ESTRO, EFOMP and National Societies, with expertise covering all subfields of RT physics, have revised the CC for recent advances in RT. The ESTRO and EFOMP Education Councils, all European National Societies and international stakeholders have been involved in the revision process., Results: A 4-year training period has been proposed, with a total of 240 ECTS (European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System). Training entrance levels have been defined ensuring the necessary physics and mathematics background. The concept of competency-based education has been reinforced by introducing the CanMEDS role framework. The updated CC includes (ablative) stereotactic-, MR-guided- and adaptive RT, particle therapy, advanced automation, complex quantitative data analysis (big data/artificial intelligence), use of biological images, and personalized treatments. Due to the continuously increasing RT complexity, more emphasis has been given to quality management. Clear requirements for a research project ensure a proper preparation of MPE residents for their central role in science and innovation in RT., Conclusion: This updated, 3 rd edition of the CC provides an MPE training framework for safe and effective practice of modern RT, while acknowledging the significant efforts needed in some countries to reach this level. The CC can contribute to further harmonization of MPE training in Europe., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) represent valuable patient-specific pre-treatment training data for tumor tracking algorithms. However, using current rendering methods, the similarity of the DRRs to real X-ray images is limited, requires time-consuming measurements and/or are computationally expensive. In this study we present RealDRR, a novel framework for highly realistic and computationally efficient DRR rendering., Materials and Methods: RealDRR consists of two components applied sequentially to render a DRR. First, a raytracer is applied for forward projection from 3D CT data to a 2D image. Second, a conditional Generative Adverserial Network (cGAN) is applied to translate the 2D forward projection to a realistic 2D DRR. The planning CT and CBCT projections from a CIRS thorax phantom and 6 radiotherapy patients (3 prostate, 3 brain) were split in training and test sets for evaluating the intra-patient, inter-patient and inter-anatomical region generalization performance of the trained framework. Several image similarity metrics, as well as a verification based on template matching, were used between the rendered DRRs and respective CBCT projections in the test sets, and results were compared to those of a current state-of-the-art DRR rendering method., Results: When trained on 800 CBCT projection images from two patients and tested on a third unseen patient from either anatomical region, RealDRR outperformed the current state-of-the-art with statistical significance on all metrics (two-sample t-test, p < 0.05). Once trained, the framework is able to render 100 highly realistic DRRs in under two minutes., Conclusion: A novel framework for realistic and efficient DRR rendering was proposed. As the framework requires a reasonable amount of computational resources, the internal parameters can be tailored to imaging systems and protocols through on-site training on retrospective imaging data., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is currently being introduced into different domains, including medicine. Specifically in radiation oncology, machine learning models allow automation and optimization of the workflow. A lack of knowledge and interpretation of these AI models can hold back wide-spread and full deployment into clinical practice. To facilitate the integration of AI models in the radiotherapy workflow, generally applicable recommendations on implementation and quality assurance (QA) of AI models are presented. For commonly used applications in radiotherapy such as auto-segmentation, automated treatment planning and synthetic computed tomography (sCT) the basic concepts are discussed in depth. Emphasis is put on the commissioning, implementation and case-specific and routine QA of AI models needed for a methodical introduction in clinical practice., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

A gimbaled-head radiotherapy device was developed by industry-academic collaborations, with a concept of robust structures whilst maintaining high flexibilities, and its clinical application started in 2008. The unique structures with multi-image guidance functions initiated 2 new treatment modalities. One is dynamic tumor tracking radiotherapy with real time monitoring (DTTRM), which enables 4-D radiotherapy without prolongation of radiotherapy treatment time. This treatment has become clinically feasible for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of lung cancers and liver tumors, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for pancreatic cancers. The second one is Dynamic WaveArc therapy (DWA), the non-coplanar versatility of the SBRT system by combining the gantry-ring synchronized rotation with dynamic multileaf collimator optimization. DWA opens the possibility to create patient-individualized treatment plans, allowing additional flexibility in organ at risk sparing while preserving dosimetric robust delivery. The clinical usefulness of the DWA has been preliminary shown for those tumors in the prostate, breast and skull base. Prospective clinical trials are under way with a support of the national funding of Japan for DTTRM and DWA, respectively. Marketing of the system was terminated in 2016 due to a commercial decision. However, lessons can be learned from the development process of this device that might be useful for those who have interests in new technologies and clinical applications in radiation oncology. This review article aims to summarize the developments and achievements of a gimbaled-head radiotherapy device with a focus on DTTRM and DWA., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: In 2017 the ACROP guideline on SBRT for peripherally located early stage NSCLC was published. Later that year ICRU-91 about prescribing, recording and reporting was published. The purpose of this study is to quantify the current variation in prescription practice in the institutions that contributed to the ACROP guideline and to establish the link between the ACROP and ICRU-91 recommendations., Material and Methods: From each of the eight participating centres, 15 SBRT plans for stage I NSCLC were analyzed. Plans were generated following the institutional protocol, centres prescribed 3 × 13.5 Gy, 3 × 15 Gy, 3 × 17 Gy or 3 × 18 Gy. Dose parameters of the target volumes were reported as recommended by ICRU-91 and also converted to BED 10Gy ., Results: The intra-institutional variance in D98%, Dmean and D2% of the PTV and GTV/ITV is substantially smaller than the inter-institutional spread, indicating well protocollised planning procedures are followed. The median values per centre ranged from 56.1 Gy to 73.1 Gy (D2%), 50.4 Gy to 63.3 Gy (Dmean) and 40.5 Gy to 53.6 Gy (D98%) for the PTV and from 57.1 Gy to 73.6 Gy (D2%), 53.7 Gy to 68.7 Gy (Dmean) and 48.5 Gy to 62.3 Gy (D98%) for the GTV/ITV. Comparing the variance in PTV D98% with the variance in GTV Dmean per centre, using an F-test, shows that four centres have a larger variance in GTV Dmean, while one centre has a larger variance in PTV D98% (p values <0.01). This shows some centres focus on achieving a constant PTV coverage while others aim at a constant GTV coverage., Conclusion: More detailed recommendations for dose planning and reporting of lung SBRT in line with ICRU-91 were formulated, including a minimum PTV D98% of 100 Gy BED 10Gy and minimum GTV/ITV mean dose of 150 Gy BED 10Gy and a D2% in the range of 60-70 Gy., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The application of the tracking-learning-detection (TLD) framework; a performant tracking algorithm for real-life objects in CCD video, was evaluated and successfully optimized for tracking anatomical structures in low-quality 2D cine-MRI acquired during MRI-guided radiotherapy. Sub-pixel tracking accuracy and >95% precision and recall was achieved despite significant deformations and periodical disappearance., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Radiation oncology has seen considerable change since ESTRO adopted its previous vision statement, less than 10 years ago. The Society has now formulated a new vision for 2030, which remains dedicated to its mission, whilst adapting to evolving contexts and the transforming landscape. Aligning with the new vision, ESTRO has developed strategic priorities for the coming years. This document, written on behalf of the Board and its leadership, describes ESTRO's strategic focus on translating science and evidence into practice, supporting professional development in the discipline, further strengthening the Society and on embracing an active policy-role., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Aim of this study was to investigate the ability of pre-treatment four dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) to capture respiratory-motion observed in thoracic and abdominal lesions during treatment. Treatment motion was acquired using full-treatment cine-MR acquisitions. Results of this analysis were compared to the ability of 30 seconds (s) cine Magnetic Resonance (MR) to estimate the same parameters., Methods: A 4DCT and 30 s cine-MR (ViewRay, USA) were acquired on the simulation day for 7 thoracic and 13 abdominal lesions. Mean amplitude, intra- and inter-fraction amplitude variability, and baseline drift were extracted from the full treatment data acquired by 2D cine-MR, and correlated to the motion on pre-treatment 30 s cine-MR and 4DCT. Using the full treatment data, safety margins on the ITV, necessary to account for all motion variability from 4DCT observed during treatment, were calculated. Mean treatment amplitudes were 2 ± 1 mm and 5 ± 3 mm in the anteroposterior (AP) and craniocaudal (CC) direction, respectively. Differences between mean amplitude during treatment and amplitude on 4DCT or during 30 s cine-MR were not significant, but 30 s cine-MR was more accurate than 4DCT. Intra-fraction amplitude variability was positively correlated with both 30 s cine-MR and 4DCT amplitude. Inter-fraction amplitude variability was minimal., Results: Mean baseline drift over all fractions and patients equalled 1 ± 1 mm in both CC and AP direction, but drifts per fraction up to 16 mm (CC) and 12 mm (AP) were observed. Margins necessary on the ITV ranged from 0 to 8 mm in CC and 0 to 5 mm in AP direction. Neither amplitude on 4DCT nor during 30 s cine MR is correlated to the magnitude of drift or the necessary margins in both directions., Conclusion: Lesions moving with small amplitude show limited amplitude variability throughout treatment, making passive motion management strategies seem adequate. However, other variations such as baseline drifts and shifts still cause significant geometrical uncertainty, favouring real-time monitoring and an active approach for all lesions influenced by respiratory motion., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate the short and long-term variability of breathing induced tumor motion., Materials and Methods: 3D tumor motion of 19 lung and 18 liver lesions captured over the course of an SBRT treatment were evaluated and compared to the motion on 4D-CT. An implanted fiducial could be used for unambiguous motion information. Fast orthogonal fluoroscopy (FF) sequences, included in the treatment workflow, were used to evaluate motion during treatment. Several motion parameters were compared between different FF sequences from the same fraction to evaluate the intrafraction variability. To assess interfraction variability, amplitude and hysteresis were compared between fractions and with the 3D tumor motion registered by 4D-CT. Population based margins, necessary on top of the ITV to capture all motion variability, were calculated based on the motion captured during treatment., Results: Baseline drift in the cranio-caudal (CC) or anterior-poster (AP) direction is significant (ie. >5 mm) for a large group of patients, in contrary to intrafraction amplitude and hysteresis variability. However, a correlation between intrafraction amplitude variability and mean motion amplitude was found (Pearson's correlation coefficient, r = 0.72, p < 10 -4 ). Interfraction variability in amplitude is significant for 46% of all lesions. As such, 4D-CT accurately captures the motion during treatment for some fractions but not for all. Accounting for motion variability during treatment increases the PTV margins in all directions, most significantly in CC from 5 mm to 13.7 mm for lung and 8.0 mm for liver., Conclusion: Both short-term and day-to-day tumor motion variability can be significant, especially for lesions moving with amplitudes above 7 mm. Abandoning passive motion management strategies in favor of more active ones is advised., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has become the standard of care for medically inoperable patients with peripherally located, early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and for those refusing surgical resection. Despite the availability of national and international guidelines, there exists substantial variability in many aspects of SBRT practice., Methods: The ESTRO ACROP guideline is based on a questionnaire covering all aspects of SBRT implementation and practice (n=114 items). The questionnaire was answered by the 11 faculty members of the ESTRO course "Clinical practice and implementation of image-guided SBRT" and their 8 institutions., Results: Agreement by >50% of the institutions was achieved in 72% of all items. Only 8/57 technologies and techniques were identified as mandatory for SBRT while 32/57 were considered as optional. In contrast, quality-assurance related elements were considered as mandatory in 12/24 items. A consensus of risk-adapted SBRT fractionation was achieved with 3×15Gy for peripherally located lesions and 4×12Gy (PTV D95-D99; D max <125% to <150%) for lesions with broad chest wall contact. For patients free from severe comorbidities and with favourable long-term OS expectancy, use of the maximum tolerated dose of 3×18Gy should be considered., Conclusions: This ACROP guideline achieved detailed recommendations in all aspects of SBRT implementation and practice, which will contribute to further standardization of SBRT for peripherally located early stage NSCLC., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Dynamic Wave Arc (DWA) is a system-specific noncoplanar arc technique that combines synchronized gantry-ring rotation with D-MLC optimization. This paper presents the clinical workflow, quality assurance program, and reports the geometric and dosimetric results of the first patient cohort treated with DWA., Methods and Materials: The RayStation TPS was clinically integrated on the Vero SBRT platform for DWA treatments. The first 15 patients treated with DWA represent a broad range of treatment sites: breast boost, prostate, lung SBRT and bone metastases, which allowed us to explore the potentials and assess the limitations of the current DWA site-specific template solution. For the DWA verification a variety of QA equipment was used, from 3D diode array to an anthropomorphic end-to-end phantom. The geometric accuracy of each arc was verified with an independent orthogonal fluoroscopy method., Results: The average beam-on delivery time was 3min, ranging from 1.22min to 8.82min. All patient QAs passed our institutional clinical criteria of gamma index. For both EBT3 film and Delta4 measurements, DWA planned versus delivered dose distributions presented an average agreement above 97%. An overall mean gantry-ring geometric deviation of -0.03°±0.46° and 0.18°±0.26° was obtained, respectively., Conclusion: For the first time, DWA has been translated into the clinic and used to treat various treatment sides. DWA has been successfully added to the noncoplanar rotational IMRT techniques arsenal, allowing additional flexibility in dose shaping while preserving dosimetrically robust delivery., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To optimize the local control of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using the Vero-SBRT system and respiratory motion management in patients with oligometastatic cancer., Materials and Methods: Patients with five or less metastases were eligible. In metastases with significant motion, a fiducial was implanted for Vero dynamic tracking. For other metastases an internal target volume (ITV) was defined to encompass the respiratory tumor trajectory. A dose of 50Gy in 10 fractions was prescribed on the 80% isodose line., Results: We treated 87 metastases in 44 patients, with colorectal cancer as the most common primary origin (65.9%). Metastatic sites were mainly lung (n=62) and liver (n=17). Twenty-seven metastases were treated with dynamic tracking, the remaining 60 using the ITV-concept. Three patients (7%) experienced grade ⩾3 toxicity. After a median follow-up of 12months, the overall one-year local control (LC) amounted to 89% (95% CI 77-95%), with corresponding values of 90% and 88% for the metastases irradiated with the ITV-approach and dynamic tracking, respectively. Median progression-free survival reached 6.5months, one-year overall survival 95%., Conclusions: SBRT with proper respiratory motion management resulted in a high LC and an acceptable toxicity profile in oligometastatic cancer patients., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: A study of real-time adaptive radiotherapy systems was performed to test the hypothesis that, across delivery systems and institutions, the dosimetric accuracy is improved with adaptive treatments over non-adaptive radiotherapy in the presence of patient-measured tumor motion., Methods and Materials: Ten institutions with robotic(2), gimbaled(2), MLC(4) or couch tracking(2) used common materials including CT and structure sets, motion traces and planning protocols to create a lung and a prostate plan. For each motion trace, the plan was delivered twice to a moving dosimeter; with and without real-time adaptation. Each measurement was compared to a static measurement and the percentage of failed points for γ-tests recorded., Results: For all lung traces all measurement sets show improved dose accuracy with a mean 2%/2mm γ-fail rate of 1.6% with adaptation and 15.2% without adaptation (p<0.001). For all prostate the mean 2%/2mm γ-fail rate was 1.4% with adaptation and 17.3% without adaptation (p<0.001). The difference between the four systems was small with an average 2%/2mm γ-fail rate of <3% for all systems with adaptation for lung and prostate., Conclusions: The investigated systems all accounted for realistic tumor motion accurately and performed to a similar high standard, with real-time adaptation significantly outperforming non-adaptive delivery methods., (Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

A novel approach to dual-energy imaging for markerless tumor tracking was proposed consisting of sequential dual-energy fluoroscopy, omitting the need for fast-switching kV generators. The implementation of this approach on a clinical tumor tracking system and its efficacy is shown feasible through optimization of the imaging parameters., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: A head-to-head comparison of two clinical correlation models with a focus on geometrical accuracy for internal tumor motion estimation during real-time tumor tracking (RTTT)., Methods and Materials: Both the CyberKnife (CK) and the Vero systems perform RTTT with a correlation model that is able to describe hysteresis in the breathing motion. The CK dual-quadratic (DQ) model consists of two polynomial functions describing the trajectory of the tumor for inhale and exhale breathing motion, respectively. The Vero model is based on a two-dimensional (2D) function depending on position and speed of the external breathing signal to describe a closed-loop tumor trajectory. In this study, 20 s of internal motion data, using an 11 Hz (on average) full fluoroscopy (FF) sequence, was used for training of the CK and Vero models. Further, a subsampled set of 15 internal tumor positions (15p) equally spread over the different phases of the breathing motion was used for separate training of the CK DQ model. Also a linear model was trained using 15p and FF tumor motion data. Fifteen liver and lung cancer patients, treated on the Vero system with RTTT, were retrospectively evaluated comparing the CK FF, CK 15p and Vero FF models using an in-house developed simulator. The distance between estimated target position and the tumor position localized by X-ray imaging was measured in the beams-eye view (BEV) to calculate the 95th percentile BEV modeling errors (ME(95,BEV)). Additionally, the percentage of ME(95,BEV) smaller than 5 mm (P(5mm)) was determined for all correlation models., Results: In general, no significant difference (p>0.05, paired t-test) was found between the CK FF and Vero models. Based on patient-specific evaluation of the geometrical accuracy of the linear, CK DQ and Vero correlation models, no statistical necessity (p>0.05, two-way ANOVA) of including hysteresis in correlation models was proven, although during inhale breathing motion, the linear model resulted in a decreased P(5mm) with 5-6% compared to both the DQ CK and Vero models., Conclusion: Dual-quadratic CyberKnife and 2D Vero correlation models were interchangeable in terms of geometrical accuracy with the CK linear ME(95,BEV)=4.1 mm, CK dual-quadratic ME(95,BEV)=3.9 mm and Vero ME(95,BEV)=3.7 mm, when modeled with FF sequence. CK DQ modeling based on 15p acquired in 20 s may lead to problems for internal motion estimation., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: This study aimed to compare procedures for dynamic tumour tracking (DTT) using a gimbal-mounted linac between centres in Japan (KU-IBRI) and Belgium (UZB), to quantify tracking error (TE), and to estimate tumour-fiducial uncertainties and PTV margins., Methods: Twenty-two patients were evaluated. TE was divided into components originating from the patient, fraction, segment, and residuals., Results: KU-IBRI applied DTT to lung cancer, while UZB treated both the lung and liver. Patients from UZB were younger and had a higher body mass index. DTT procedures differed in the use of body fixation, correction for set-up error, type of fiducial markers, and goodness of fit of correlation model. TE was larger at UZB in the intra-fraction components, whereas the tumour-fiducial uncertainties were estimated to be larger at KU-IBRI. These results ultimately led to similar PTV margins at both centres (2.1, 4.2, and 2.6 mm for KU-IBRI; 2.4, 3.6, and 2.0 mm for UZB in LR, AP, and SI, respectively, for 99% coverage of patients)., Conclusion: Several differences in procedures and patient characteristics were observed that affected TE and tumour-fiducial uncertainties. This analysis confirmed similar accuracy in DTT delivery and adequate PTV margins in the different centres based on their local specific workflows., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

In order to target arteriovenous malformations (AVM) in a frameless approach, registration of two-dimensional (2D) digital-subtracted-angiographs (DSA) with three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) is required. Targeting accuracy and delineation of a frameless 2D-DSA and 3D-CT image registration tool based on bony anatomy of the skull was evaluated. This frameless approach assures accurate target localization and can be used in a clinical setting., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in oligometastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) resulted in a disappointing 1-year local control rate of 54% in our experience. We aimed to determine the root cause(s)., Methods: 47 oligometastatic CRC patients were treated with SBRT by helical tomotherapy to a dose of 40 or 50Gy in 10 fractions, without specific respiratory motion management and PTV-margins of 10-10-12mm in all patients. The local recurrences (LRs) were delineated on diagnostic PET-CT scans and co-registered with initial planning CTs. LRs were classified as in-field or marginal with respect to the initial dose distribution, and predictors for LR were determined., Results: Out of 105 irradiated metastases, LR modeling yielded 15 in-field and 15 marginal failures. Metastases in moving organs (liver and lung) exhibited a local control of 53% at 1-year (95% confidence interval (CI): 38-67%), compared to 79% for lymph nodes (95% CI: 32-95%). The first group exhibited a sixfold increased risk compared to the latter on multivariate analysis (p=0.01)., Conclusions: The nature and locations of LR indicated that dose prescription and methodology were both inadequate for liver and lung metastases. This study demonstrates the need for individual respiratory motion management and a biological effective dose of >75Gy., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: For tumor tracking, a correlation model is used to estimate internal tumor position based on external surrogate motion. When patients experience an internal/external surrogate drift, an update of the correlation model is required to continue tumor tracking. In this study, the accuracy of the internal tumor position estimation for both the clinical available update at discrete points in time (rebuild) and an in-house developed non-clinical online update approach was investigated., Methods: A dynamic phantom with superimposed baseline drifts and 14 SBRT patients, treated with real-time tumor tracking (RTTT) on the Vero system, were retrospectively simulated for three update scenarios, respectively no update, clinical rebuild and 0.5 Hz automated online update of the correlation model. By comparing the target positions based on 0.5 Hz verification X-ray images with the estimated internal tumor positions regarding all three update scenarios, 95th percentile modeling errors (ME95), incidences of full geometrical coverage of the CTV by a 5 mm extended PTV (P₅mm) and population-based PTV margins were calculated. Further, the treatment time reduction was estimated when switching from the clinical rebuild approach to the online correlation model update., Results: For dynamic phantom motion with baseline drifts up to 0.4 mm/min, a 0.5 Hz intra-fraction update showed a similar accuracy in terms of ME95 and P5 mm compared to clinical rebuild. For SBRT patients treated on Vero with RTTT, accuracy was improved by 0.5 Hz online update compared to the clinical rebuild protocol, yielding smaller PTV margins (from 3.2 mm to 2.7 mm), reduced ME95,3D (from 4.1 mm to 3.4 mm) and an increased 5th percentile P5 mm (from 90.7% to 96.1%) for the entire patient group. Further, 80% of treatment sessions were reduced in time with on average 5.5 ± 4.1(1 SD)min., Conclusion: With a fast (0.5 Hz) automated online update of the correlation model, an efficient RTTT workflow with improved geometrical accuracy was obtained., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To report on the first clinical application of a real-time tumor tracking (RTTT) solution based on the Vero SBRT gimbaled linac system for treatment of moving tumors., Methods and Materials: A first group of 10 SBRT patients diagnosed with NSCLC or oligometastatic disease in lung or liver was treated with the RTTT technique. The PTV volumes and OAR exposure were benchmarked against the widely used ITV approach. Based on data acquired during execution of RTTT treatments, a first review was performed of the process., Results: The 35% PTV volume reduction with RTTT of the studied single lesions SBRT irradiations of small target volumes is expected to result in a small (<1%) reduction of lung or liver NTCP. A GTV-PTV margin of 5.0mm was applied for treatment planning of RTTT. From patient data on residual geometric uncertainties, a CTV-PTV margin of 3.2mm was calculated. Reduction of the GTV-PTV margin below 5.0mm without better understanding of biological definition of tumor boundaries was discouraged. Total treatment times were reduced to 34.4 min on average., Conclusion: A considerable PTV volume reduction was achieved applying RTTT and time efficiency for respiratory correlated SBRT was reestablished with Vero RTTT., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: The addition of chemotherapy to preoperative radiotherapy has been established as the standard of care for patients with cT3-4 rectal cancer. As an alternative strategy, we explored intensity-modulated and image-guided radiotherapy (IMRT-IGRT) with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in a prospective phase II study. Here, we report outcome and late toxicity after a median follow-up of 54 months., Methods and Materials: A total of 108 patients were treated preoperatively with IMRT-IGRT, delivering a dose of 46 Gy in fractions of 2 Gy. Patients (n=57) displaying an anticipated circumferential resection margin (CRM) of less than 2mm based on magnetic resonance imaging received a SIB to the tumor up to a total dose of 55.2 Gy., Results: The absolute incidence of grade ≥3 late gastrointestinal and urinary toxicity was 9% and 4%, respectively, with a 13% rate of any grade ≥3 late toxicity. The actuarial 5-year local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 97%, 57%, and 68%. On multivariate analysis, R1 resection and pN2 disease were associated with significantly impaired OS., Conclusions: The use of preoperative IMRT-IGRT with a SIB resulted in a high 5-year LC rate and non-negligible late toxicity., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: For dynamic tracking of moving tumors, robust intra-fraction verification was required, to assure that tumor motion was properly managed during the course of radiotherapy. A dual-modality verification system, consisting of an on-board orthogonal kV and planar MV imaging device, was validated and applied retrospectively to patient data., Methods and Materials: Real-time tumor tracking (RTTT) was managed by applying PAN and TILT angular corrections to the therapeutic beam using a gimbaled linac. In this study, orthogonal X-ray imaging and MV EPID fluoroscopy was acquired simultaneously. The tracking beam position was derived from respectively real-time gimbals log files and the detected field outline on EPID. For both imaging modalities, the moving target was localized by detection of an implanted fiducial. The dual-modality tracking verification was validated against a high-precision optical camera in phantom experiments and applied to clinical tracking data from a liver and two lung cancer patients., Results: Both verification modalities showed a high accuracy (<0.3mm) during validation on phantom. Marker detection on EPID was influenced by low image contrast. For the clinical cases, gimbaled tracking showed a 90th percentile error (E90) of 3.45 (liver), 2.44 (lung A) and 3.40 mm (lung B) based on EPID fluoroscopy and good agreement with XR-log file data by an E90 of 3.13, 1.92 and 3.33 mm, respectively, during beam on., Conclusion: Dual-modality verification was successfully implemented, offering the possibility of detailed reporting on RTTT performance., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Our previous studies showed that intrafraction motion needs to be corrected for in frameless radiosurgery. This study was designed to evaluate if verification images can correct for mechanical inaccuracy and intrafraction motion. With proper immobilization and verification images on a regular basis during treatment, mechanical (table-) inaccuracies and intrafraction motion can be corrected for and the absence of PTV-margins warranted., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To have an initial assessment of the Vero Dynamic Tracking workflow in clinical circumstances and quantify the performance of the tracking system, a simulation study was set up on 5 lung and liver patients., Methods and Materials: The preparatory steps of a tumor tracking treatment, based on fiducial markers implanted in the tumor, were executed allowing pursuit of the tumor with the gimbaled linac and monitoring X-rays acquisition, however, without activating the 6 MV beam. Data were acquired on workflow time-efficiency, tracking accuracy and imaging exposure., Results: The average time between the patient entering the treatment room and the first treatment field was about 9 min. The time for building the correlation model was 3.2 min. Tracking errors of 0.55 and 0.95 mm (1σ) were observed in PAN/TILT direction and a 2D range of 3.08 mm. A skin dose was determined of 0.08 mGy/image, with a source-to-skin distance of 900 mm and kV exposure of 1 mAs. On average 1.8 mGy/min kV skin dose was observed for 1 Hz monitoring., Conclusion: The Vero tracking solution proved to be fully functional and showed performance comparable with other real-time tracking systems., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: We investigated the influence of beam modulation on treatment planning by comparing four available stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) modalities: Gamma-Knife-Perfexion, Novalis-Tx Dynamic-Conformal-Arc (DCA) and Dynamic-Multileaf-Collimation-Intensity-Modulated-radiotherapy (DMLC-IMRT), and Cyberknife., Material and Methods: Patients with arteriovenous malformation (n = 10) or acoustic neuromas (n = 5) were planned with different treatment modalities. Paddick conformity index (CI), dose heterogeneity (DH), gradient index (GI) and beam-on time were used as dosimetric indices., Results: Gamma-Knife-Perfexion can achieve high degree of conformity (CI = 0.77 ± 0.04) with limited low-doses (GI = 2.59 ± 0.10) surrounding the inhomogeneous dose distribution (D(H) = 0.84 ± 0.05) at the cost of treatment time (68.1 min ± 27.5). Novalis-Tx-DCA improved this inhomogeneity (D(H) = 0.30 ± 0.03) and treatment time (16.8 min ± 2.2) at the cost of conformity (CI = 0.66 ± 0.04) and Novalis-TX-DMLC-IMRT improved the DCA CI (CI = 0.68 ± 0.04) and inhomogeneity (D(H) = 0.18 ± 0.05) at the cost of low-doses (GI = 3.94 ± 0.92) and treatment time (21.7 min ± 3.4) (p<0.01). Cyberknife achieved comparable conformity (CI = 0.77 ± 0.06) at the cost of low-doses (GI = 3.48 ± 0.47) surrounding the homogeneous (D(H) = 0.22 ± 0.02) dose distribution and treatment time (28.4min±8.1) (p<0.01)., Conclusions: Gamma-Knife-Perfexion will comply with all SRS constraints (high conformity while minimizing low-dose spread). Multiple focal entries (Gamma-Knife-Perfexion and Cyberknife) will achieve better conformity than High-Definition-MLC of Novalis-Tx at the cost of treatment time. Non-isocentric beams (Cyberknife) or IMRT-beams (Novalis-Tx-DMLC-IMRT) will spread more low-dose than multiple isocenters (Gamma-Knife-Perfexion) or dynamic arcs (Novalis-Tx-DCA). Inverse planning and modulated fluences (Novalis-Tx-DMLC-IMRT and CyberKnife) will deliver the most homogeneous treatment. Furthermore, Linac-based systems (Novalis and Cyberknife) can perform image verification at the time of treatment delivery., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

A measurement procedure based on alanine/electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) dosimetry was implemented successfully providing simple, stable, and accurate dose-to-water (D(w)) measurements. The correspondence between alanine and ionization chamber measurements in reference conditions was excellent. Alanine/EMR dosimetry might be a valuable alternative to thermoluminescent (TLD) and ionization chamber based measuring procedures in radiotherapy audits., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: VERO is a novel platform for image guided stereotactic body radiotherapy. Orthogonal gimbals hold the linac-MLC assembly allowing real-time moving tumor tracking. This study determines the geometric accuracy of the tracking., Materials and Methods: To determine the tracking error, an 1D moving phantom produced sinusoidal motion with frequencies up to 30 breaths per minute (bpm). Tumor trajectories of patients were reproduced using a 2D robot and pursued with the gimbals tracking system prototype. Using the moving beam light field and a digital-camera-based detection unit tracking errors, system lag and equivalence of pan/tilt performance were measured., Results: The system lag was 47.7 ms for panning and 47.6 ms for tilting. Applying system lag compensation, sinusoidal motion tracking was accurate, with a tracking error 90% percentile E(90%)<0.82 mm and similar performance for pan/tilt. Systematic tracking errors were below 0.14 mm. The 2D tumor trajectories were tracked with an average E(90%) of 0.54 mm, and tracking error standard deviations of 0.20 mm for pan and 0.22 mm for tilt., Conclusions: In terms of dynamic behavior, the gimbaled linac of the VERO system showed to be an excellent approach for providing accurate real-time tumor tracking in radiation therapy., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The past decade has provided many technological advances in radiotherapy. The European Institute of Radiotherapy (EIR) was established by the European Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ESTRO) to provide current consensus statement with evidence-based and pragmatic guidelines on topics of practical relevance for radiation oncology. This report focuses primarily on 3D CT-based in-room image guidance (3DCT-IGRT) systems. It will provide an overview and current standing of 3DCT-IGRT systems addressing the rationale, objectives, principles, applications, and process pathways, both clinical and technical for treatment delivery and quality assurance. These are reviewed for four categories of solutions; kV CT and kV CBCT (cone-beam CT) as well as MV CT and MV CBCT. It will also provide a framework and checklist to consider the capability and functionality of these systems as well as the resources needed for implementation. Two different but typical clinical cases (tonsillar and prostate cancer) using 3DCT-IGRT are illustrated with workflow processes via feedback questionnaires from several large clinical centres currently utilizing these systems. The feedback from these clinical centres demonstrates a wide variability based on local practices. This report whilst comprehensive is not exhaustive as this area of development remains a very active field for research and development. However, it should serve as a practical guide and framework for all professional groups within the field, focussed on clinicians, physicists and radiation therapy technologists interested in IGRT., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Investigation of the use of TomoTherapy and TomoDirect versus conventional radiotherapy for the treatment of post-operative breast carcinoma. This study concentrates on the evaluation of the planning protocol for the TomoTherapy and TomoDirect TPS, dose verification and the implementation of in vivo dosimetry., Materials and Methods: Eight patients with different breast cancer indications (left/right tumor, axillary nodes involvement (N+)/no nodes (N0), tumorectomy/mastectomy) were enrolled. TomoTherapy, TomoDirect and conventional plans were generated for prone and supine positions leading to six or seven plans per patient. Dose prescription was 42Gy in 15 fractions over 3weeks. Dose verification of a TomoTherapy plan is performed using TLDs and EDR2 film inside a home-made wax breast phantom fixed on a rando-alderson phantom. In vivo dosimetry was performed with TLDs., Results: It is possible to create clinically acceptable plans with TomoTherapy and TomoDirect. TLD calibration protocol with a water equivalent phantom is accurate. TLD verification with the phantom shows measured over calculated ratios within 2.2% (PTV). An overresponse of the TLDs was observed in the low dose regions (<0.1Gy). The film measurements show good agreement for high and low dose regions inside the phantom. A sharp gradient can be created to the thoracic wall. In vivo dosimetry with TLDs was clinically feasible., Conclusions: The TomoTherapy and TomoDirect modalities can deliver dose distributions which the radiotherapist judges to be equal to or better than conventional treatment of breast carcinoma according to the organ to be protected.

Purpose: To study the feasibility of measuring volumetric changes in the primary tumor on megavoltage-computed tomography (MVCT) during chemoradiation and to examine the correlation with local response., Patients and Methods: Fifteen consecutive patients with stage III, inoperable, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were treated in a prospective dose escalation study protocol of concurrent chemoradiation. They were monitored for acute toxicity and evaluated with daily MVCT imaging. The volumetric changes were fitted to a negative exponential resulting in a regression coefficient (RC). Local response evaluation was done with positron emission tomography using the radio-labeled glucose analogue F18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET)., Results: The mean volume decrease (+/-standard deviation) was 73% (+/-18%). With a mean treatment time of 42days this treatment schedule resulted in a mean decrease of 1.74%/day. Of the 13 evaluable patients seven developed a metabolic complete remission (MCR). The mean RC of the patients with MCR is 0.050 versus a mean RC of 0.023 in non-responders (p=0.0074). Using a proposed cut-off value for the RC of 0.03 80% of the non-responders will be detected correctly while misclassifying 16.4% of patients who will eventually achieve an MCR. The total cumulative percentage of esophageal grade 3 or more toxicity was 46.7%., Conclusion: The RC derived from volumetric analysis of daily MVCT is prognostic and predictive for local response in patients treated with chemoradiation for a locally advanced NSCLC. Because this treatment schedule is toxic in nearly half of the patient population, MVCT is a tool in the implementation of patient-individualized treatment strategies.

Purpose: The feasibility to use visually guided voluntary breath-hold with and without audio assistance to reduce the total treatment time was evaluated., Materials and Methods: Patients referred for gated SBRT received hypofractionation schedules for lung or liver treatments. The patients were treated with the Novalis system (BrainLAB AG, Feldkirchen, Germany) and IGRT was performed with ExacTrac5.0/NovalisBody allowing gated irradiation. Video glasses, used for visual feedback to guide voluntary breath-hold, allowed additional audio assistance during treatment. The technique was applied for 25 patients of whom 9 were treated in free breathing, 7 had only visual feedback and another 9 had both audio and visual feedback., Results: The delivery time of gated treatment during free breathing had an average value of 1.7 min/100 MU (SD 0.6 min/100 MU). The introduction of visual feedback reduced the average delivery time to 1.4 min/100 MU (SD 0.4 min/100 MU). The treatments with additional audio assistance indicated a significant reduction (p=0.004) of the average delivery time to 0.9 min/100 MU (SD 0.2 min/100 MU)., Conclusion: The introduction of visually guided voluntary breath-hold with audio assistance led to treatment times for gated radiation therapy approaching conformal beam delivery times, which made gated treatments applicable in conventional treatment time slots.

Purpose: The aim of the study was to measure the mean duration of treatments and to investigate the occasional events, with extreme influence on treatment time., Patients and Methods: Time measurements were performed from the start of patient treatments (n=72) and one year later (n=27) on TomoTherapy. The time interval of the different procedures during treatment was measured. The cause of extra long treatment time was examined. All patients received a MV-CT scan prior to treatment., Results: The mean overall total treatment time per localization ranged from 21.3 to 27.4 min. In 4.1% of the total population extreme long time measurements have been observed, interruptions due to equipment malfunction being the main cause (57.5%). Comparison between time measurements performed after clinical implementation and time measurements performed one year later to examine the learning curve, showed no differences., Conclusion: Treating a patient on TomoTherapy takes approximately 25 min, yielding 19 patients to be treated within 8 h. However, occasional treatment interruptions and variations in time of irradiation have a certain impact on daily patient scheduling for treatment, and influences the workload from day-to-day.

Progress in radiotherapy is guided by the need to realize improved dose distributions, i.e. the ability to reduce the treatment volume toward the target volume and still ensuring coverage of that target volume in all dimensions. Poor ability to control the tumour's location limits the accuracy with which radiation can be delivered to tumour-bearing tissue. Image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) aims at in-room imaging guiding the radiation delivery based on instant knowledge of the target location and changes in tumour volume during treatment. Advancements are usually not to be attributed to a single event, but rather a combination of many small improvements that together enable a superior result. Image-guidance is an important link in the treatment chain and as such a major factor in this synergetic process. A historic review shows that many of the so-called new developments are not so new at all, but did not make it into mainstream radiotherapy practice at that time. Recent developments in improved IT infrastructures, novel irradiation techniques, and better knowledge of functional and morphologic information may have created the need and optimal environment to revive the interest in IGRT.

We treated 36 cases of stage I/II non-small cell lung cancer in inoperable patients. Treatments were planned to a total isocenter dose of 60Gy (8x7.5Gy) based on a dynamic field shaping arc, employing one arc to span as much area as possible and if needed additional weighted segments. The 2 year infield progression free probability is 65%. Disease-specific survival is 75% at 2 years. No patients experienced grade 3-4 toxicity.

Background and Purpose: In helical tomotherapy the nature of the optimizing and planning systems allows the delivery of dose on the skin using a build-up compensating technique (skin flash). However, positioning errors or changes in the patient's contour can influence the correct dosage in these regions. This work studies the behavior of skin-flash regions using phantom and in-vivo dosimetry., Materials and Methods: The dosimetric accuracy of the tomotherapy planning system in skin-flash regions is checked using film and TLD on phantom. Positioning errors are induced and the effect on the skin dose is investigated. Further a volume decrease is simulated using bolus material and the results are compared., Results: Results show that the tomotherapy planning system calculates dose on skin regions within 2 SD using TLD measurements. Film measurements show drops of dose of 2.8% and 26% for, respectively, a 5mm and 10mm mispositioning of the phantom towards air and a dose increase of 9% for a 5mm shift towards tissue. These measurements are confirmed by TLD measurements. A simulated volume reduction shows a similar behavior with a 2.6% and 19.4% drop in dose, measured with TLDs., Conclusion: The tomotherapy system allows adequate planning and delivery of dose using skin flashes. However, exact positioning is crucial to deliver the dose at the exact location.

Background and Purpose: The purpose of this study is to assess retrospectively secondary patient motion induced by 6D patient setup correction., Materials and Methods: For 104 patients, treated with Novalis, 6D setup correction prior to treatment was performed by ExacTrac5.0/NovalisBody in combination with the Robotic Tilt Module mounted underneath the Exact Couch top. This 6D correction might induce additional setup errors due to patient reaction against the rotations. To evaluate induced secondary motion, the 6D setup correction is verified and evaluated with respect to the tolerance limits., Results: The majority of measured secondary motions are found within the tolerance limits. Detected secondary motions are mostly found in longitudinal shifts and lateral rotations, and mainly found in only 1 dimension during the same verification. The verifications indicate that the patient population can be divided into a group that hardly moves and a group that moves throughout all 6D setup corrections. The patient's behavior can be predicted by the evaluation of the first five fractions as none of the patients demonstrate a learning curve during the treatment., Conclusions: 6D setup correction does not induce secondary motion for the majority of the patients and can therefore be applied for all treatment indications.

We evaluated setup accuracy of NovalisBody stereoscopic X-ray positioning with automated correction for rotational errors with the Robotics Tilt Module in patients treated with conformal arc radiotherapy for prostate cancer. The correction of rotational errors was shown to reduce random and systematic errors in all directions. (NovalisBody and Robotics Tilt Module are products of BrainLAB A.G., Heimstetten, Germany).

Background and Purpose: Recalculating dose distributions using measured IMRT fluence fields imported into the treatment planning system (TPS) to evaluate the technical feasibility of a prototype developed for breathing synchronized irradiation., Patients and Methods: DMLC-IMRT fluence patterns acquired on radiographic film, generated by the linac in non-gated and gated mode, have been imported into the TPS. The effect of dose blurring and possible interplay between organ motion and leaf motion, and the efficacy of a breathing synchronized irradiation technique (an adapted version of a commercially available image-guidance system: NOVALIS BODY/ExacTrac4.0, BrainLAB AG) have been evaluated using radiographic film mounted to a simple phantom simulating a breathing pattern of 16 cycles per minute and covering a distance of 4 cm to obtain the resulting fluence maps. Two situations have been investigated to illustrate this principle: (a) a tumor located close to the diaphragm to assess the influence of organ motion on the dose to the target volume as well as to the gastro-intestinal tract that presents a high risk at intersecting with the beam during the breathing cycle. (b) A mediastinal lesion requiring complicated fluence patterns., Results: Importing measured fluence maps yielded highly disturbed reconstructed dose distributions in case of the non-gated delivery with the phantom in motion (both orthogonal and parallel to the leaf direction), whereas the measurements from the static (film fixed in space) and the gated delivery showed good agreement with the original theoretical dose distribution. These findings have been confirmed by the dose-volume histograms, corresponding tumor control probabilities, conformity index and dose heterogeneity values. The normal tissue complication probabilities investigated in this study seem to be affected to a lesser degree, which concurs with the observation that the motion effects result in a dose spread in the direction of motion. The applied breathing synchronization technique introduced an increased treatment time with a factor 3-4., Conclusions: The use of measured fluence fields, delivered by the linac in non-gated and gated mode, as imported fluence maps for the treatment planning system is an interesting quality assurance tool and revealed the dramatic impact of dose blurring and interplay between DMLC-IMRT dose delivery and organ motion, as well as the potential of breathing synchronization to resolve this issue. The possible advantage of breathing synchronized irradiation is compromised with an increased treatment time.

A spreadsheet based program is presented to perform an independent Monitor Unit (MU) calculation verification for the Quality Assurance (QA) of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) using Dynamic MultiLeaf Collimation (DMLC). The computed dose value is compared to the planned dose by calculating the percent dose difference per Intensity Modulated Beam (IMB) and absolute dose difference per IMB. The proposed acceptability levels are +/-5.0% or +/-2.0 cGy for the percent dose difference per IMB and the absolute dose difference per IMB, respectively. For percent dose difference per treatment, an acceptability level of +/-2.0% is proposed. The presented program is considered adequate for checking the treatment plans calculated for IMRT treatments using DMLC as a part of the QA procedure.

Background and Purpose: The aim of this study is to investigate the positional accuracy of a prototype X-ray imaging tool in combination with a real-time infrared tracking device allowing automated patient set-up in three dimensions., Material and Methods: A prototype X-ray imaging tool has been integrated with a commercially released real-time infrared tracking device. The system, consisting of two X-ray tubes mounted to the ceiling and a centrally located amorphous silicon detector has been developed for automated patient positioning from outside the treatment room prior to treatment. Two major functions are supported: (a) automated fusion of the actual treatment images with digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) representing the desired position; (b) matching of implanted radio opaque markers. Measurements of known translational (up to 30.0mm) and rotational (up to 4.0 degrees ) set-up errors in three dimensions as well as hidden target tests have been performed on anthropomorphic phantoms., Results: The system's accuracy can be represented with the mean three-dimensional displacement vector, which yielded 0.6mm (with an overall SD of 0.9mm) for the fusion of DRRs and X-ray images. Average deviations between known translational errors and calculations varied from -0.3 to 0.6mm with a standard deviation in the range of 0.6-1.2mm. The marker matching algorithm yielded a three-dimensional uncertainty of 0.3mm (overall SD: 0.4mm), with averages ranging from 0.0 to 0.3mm and a standard deviation in the range between 0.3 and 0.4mm., Conclusions: The stereoscopic X-ray imaging device integrated with the real-time infrared tracking device represents a positioning tool allowing for the geometrical accuracy that is required for conformal radiation therapy of abdominal and pelvic lesions, within an acceptable time-frame.

Background and Purpose: To investigate if the Pencil Beam (PB) algorithm takes the disturbance of the dose distribution due to tissue inhomogeneities sufficiently into account in dynamic field shaping rotation therapy (called the dynamic arc treatment modality) for fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy of head and neck tumors., Material and Methods: A treatment plan using the dynamic arc treatment modality of an oropharynx lesion on a humanoid phantom was evaluated. The same plan was calculated with three different calculation algorithms: the Clarkson and the PB algorithm (both available on the planning system of the Novalis system used for dynamic arc treatments), and the Collapsed Cone Convolution Superposition (CC) algorithm (used by the Pinnacle planning system). The three resulting plans are compared using isodose distributions and cumulative dose volume histograms (CDVHs). An intercomparison of the results of the three algorithms was performed to investigate how accurately each of them takes the influence of tissue inhomogeneities into account such as bony structures and air cavities often appearing in the head and neck region. Additionally, the resulting plans were compared with absolute and relative dosimetric measurements of the treatment plan on the humanoid phantom with thermoluminescent detectors and radiographic film, respectively., Results: All calculated dose distributions show a good agreement with the measured distribution except in the planning target volume (PTV) in and at the border of the air cavity. All three algorithms overestimate the dose in the PTV at the boundary with the low-density tissue, with 12, 10 and 7% for the Clarkson, the PB and the CC algorithm, respectively. The correspondence between the calculated dose distributions is reflected in the graphs of the CDVHs. They show similar curves for the PTV and the structures except for the left parotic gland and the myelum., Conclusions: The PB algorithm of the Novalis system calculates a treatment plan for the dynamic arc treatment modality adequately for fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy of head and neck tumors, except in the PTV in and at the border of the air cavity where the actual dose is overestimated. Care needs to be taken in clinical cases where it is critical to irradiate the air-tissue boundary to a sufficient dose., (Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.)

The sliding window technique used for static and dynamic segmentation of intensity modulated beams is evaluated. Dynamic delivery is preferred since the resulting distributions correspond better with the calculated distributions, the treatment beam is used more efficiently and the delivery is less sensitive to small variations in the accuracy of the multileaf collimator (MLC).

Background and Purpose: To evaluate the treatment efficiency of different conformal radiation therapy techniques in prostate cancer., Materials and Methods: Three major classes of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivery as well as a conformal rotation technique have been evaluated: sequential tomotherapy, dynamic multileaf collimation (DMLC) with conventional MLC, DMLC with miniMLC and dynamic field shaping arc. Treatment planning for the IMRT techniques has been performed with inverse planning. Forward planning was used for the dynamic arc technique. The four techniques have been compared to treat two different prostate cases with a conservative target dose of 70 Gy: a convex shaped target volume and one containing concavities formed by the bladder and rectum. Cumulative dose volume histograms, tumor control probability and normal tissue complication probability, conformity index and dose heterogeneity, and finally efficiency of treatment delivery have been evaluated., Results: For the convex shaped target, all treatment modalities met the desired treatment goals, although the conventional MLC delivered more dose to the bladder. Compared to the dynamic arc modality, both tomotherapy and the conventional MLC technique needed a tenfold higher number of monitor units per target dose, and the miniMLC a twofold higher number. The same trend has been observed for the concave target, yet the dynamic arc did not meet the desired dose reduction for the rectum. The miniMLC configuration represented the best compromise for both targets with respect to treatment goals and delivery efficiency. Sequential tomotherapy performed adequately with respect to conformity at the cost of efficiency., Conclusions: Together with conformity and delivery efficiency the shape of the target should be considered as an important parameter in the selection of the treatment modality.

Background and Purpose: Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has been introduced in our department for treatment of the head and neck region with the intention of reducing complications without compromising treatment outcome. However, these new treatment modalities inevitably require a substantial increase in monitor units per target dose yielding an increased risk of secondary malignancies induced by the treatment. This study aims at assessing the increased risk by means of in vivo measurements of the whole-body equivalent dose of both the conventional and the IMRT treatment techniques for head and neck lesions., Material and Methods: A conventional technique using parallel opposed, wedged treatment fields has been compared with a slice-by-slice arc rotation technique for IMRT. Both techniques were used to treat head and neck lesions with a 6-MV photon beam. Thermoluminescent badges and neutron bubble detectors designed for personnel monitoring have been applied to obtain the estimated whole-body equivalent dose on three patients for each treatment technique. The nominal probability coefficient for a lifetime risk of excess fatal cancer, recommended by the ICRP 60 has been used for risk estimates based on the estimated dose values., Results: An estimated whole-body equivalent dose per monitor unit equal to 1.2 x 10(-2) mSv/MU and 1.6 x 10(-2) mSv/MU have been obtained with the conventional and IMRT technique, respectively. Applying the average amount of MU necessary to realize a 70 Gy target dose the estimated whole-body equivalent dose for both treatment techniques becomes 242 mSv (conventional) and 1969 mSv (IMRT), yielding an increase in the risk for secondary malignancies with a factor 8., Conclusions: Historically the risk of secondary malignancies has been accepted to take advantage of the possible benefits of improved local control and treatment outcome. However, the introduction of new and sophisticated treatment techniques will also increase the risk of radiation induced malignancies. Therefore, these risk estimates become important to assess whether the benefits of the treatment technique outweigh the possible risks.

Background and Purpose: The integration of a scanner for computed tomography (CT) and a treatment simulator (Sim-CT, Elekta Oncology Systems, Crawley, UK) has been studied in a clinical situation. Image quality, hounsfield units (HU) and linearity have been evaluated as well as the implications for treatment planning. The additional dose to the patient has also been highlighted., Material and Methods: Image data is acquired using an array of solid state X-ray detectors attached externally to the simulator's image intensifier. Three different fields of view (FOV: 25.0 cm, 35.0 cm and 50.0 cm) with 0.2 cm, 0.5 cm and 1.0 cm slice thickness can be selected and the system allows for an aperture diameter of 92.0 cm at standard isocentric height. The CT performance has been characterized with several criteria: spatial resolution, contrast sensitivity, geometric accuracy, reliability of hounsfield units and the radiation output level. The spatial resolution gauge of the nuclear associates quality phantom (NAQP) as well as modulation transfer functions (MTF) have been applied to evaluate the spatial resolution. Contrast sensitivity and HU measurements have been performed by means of the NAQP and a HU conversion phantom that allows inserts with different electron densities. The computed tomography dose index (CTDI) of the CT-option has been monitored with a pencil shaped ionization chamber. Treatment planning and dose calculations for heterogeneity correction based on the Sim-CT images generated from an anthropomorphic phantom as well as from ten patients have been compared with similar treatment plans based on identical, yet diagnostic CT (DCT) images., Results: The last row of holes that are resolved in the spatial resolution gauge of the NAQP are either 0.150 cm or 0.175 cm depending on the FOV and the applied reconstruction filter. These are consistent with the MTF curves showing cut-off frequencies ranging from 5.3 lp/cm to 7.1 lp/cm. Linear regression analysis of HU versus electron densities revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.99. Contrast, pixel size and geometric accuracy are within specifications. Computed tomography dose index values of 0.204 Gy/As and 0.069 Gy/As have been observed with dose measurements in the center of a 16 cm diameter and 32 cm diameter phantom, respectively for large FOV. Small FOV yields CTDI values of 0.925 Gy/As and 0.358 Gy/As which is a factor ten higher than the results obtained from a DCT under similar acquisition conditions. The phantom studies showed excellent agreement between dose distributions generated with the Sim-CT and DCT HU. The deviations between the calculated settings of monitor units as well as the maximum dose in three dimensions were less than 1% for the treatment plans based on either of these HU both for pelvic as well as thoracic simulations. The patient studies confirmed these results., Conclusions: The CT-option can be considered as an added value to the simulation process and the images acquired on the Sim-CT system are adequate for dose calculation with tissue heterogeneity correction. The good image quality, however, is compromised by the relative high dose values to the patient. The considerable load to the conventional X-ray tube currently limits the Sim-CT to seven image acquisitions per patient and therefore the system is limited in its capability to perform full three-dimensional reconstruction.