Search

In the article , the author discusses the issue of whether undocumented immigrants have the right to own guns by citing the case of illegal migrant Heriberto Carbajal-Flores from Mexico. Also cited are the ruling by Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman that Carbajal-Flores has the right to own gun which he used in defending a tyre shop from looters and the broadening of the scope of the Second Amendment on the right to bear arms.

The article offers political news briefs worldwide as of March 2024. Russia sustained its intense drone and missile assaults on Ukraine. Also cited are the attack by gunmen of a concert hall near Moscow, Russia, the South African court ruling allowing the participation of a party backed by former President Jacob Zuma, and the strengthening by the U.S. and Japan of their military alliance.

The article discusses how the concept of originalism could be used as a tool by U.S. Supreme Court justices to advance their agenda. Also cited are the claim by 1987 justice nominee Robert Bork that judges should consider the intentions of the drafters of the Constitution in their decision making, and how the concept is leading to conservative results as advanced by the six conservative justices.

The article discusses legal issues involving antiquities like the bronze Celtiberian helmets, which will be the focus of a court hearing in Munich, Germany in September 2021. The helmets were returned by its owner Christian Levett to the Spanish government, but is seeking the sellers to return his money. Also cited is the sentence meted by Spain's Supreme Court to artifacts hunter Ricardo Granada and his accomplice.

The article reports on legal issues regarding abortion rights in Texas following the refusal by the U.S. Supreme Court in September 2021 to block the implementation of a law banning abortion in the state. Also cited are the 1973 court ruling in Roe v. Wade declaring abortion as a constitutional right, and the temporary restraining order issued by a Texas judge preventing the group Texas Right to Life from suing Planned Parenthood affiliates in Texas.

The author reflects on abortion issues in the U.S., particularly the failure by the Supreme Court to block the implementation of a Texas law banning abortion after around six weeks of pregnancy. Topics include the possible effect of the ruling to the right to abortion set out in Roe v. Wade, and how the law's implementation is allegedly bad for women in Texas and the rule of law.

The article reports on updates on the trial of blood testing startup firm Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes, particularly the guilty ruling by the 12-member jury on four counts of fraudulently deceiving investors. Also cited are the expected appeal to be filed by Holmes' lawyers, Theranos' aim to commercialize a blood-testing technology, and the firm's bankruptcy even before going public.

The article reports on the presidency of El Salvador President Nayib Bukele as of September 2021, particularly his growing popularity and authoritarian tendencies. Also cited are the protests against the Supreme Court ruling allowing Bukele to run for a second term in the 2024 elections, how Bukele allegedly replaced five judges with his sympathisers, and the high approval rating of Bukele by citizens.

The article reports on the ruling issued by Mexico's Supreme Court in September 2021 to decriminalise abortion. Also cited are how the ruling is a victory for women's rights, the outright ban on abortion in nearly all states in the country, the need for the states to amend their abortion laws due to the ruling, and the alleged anti-women policies of President Andre´s Manuel Lo´pez Obrador.

The article reports on the decision by a federal judge in New York in September 2021 to approve the bankruptcy plan of Purdue Pharma that settled thousands of lawsuits against the company due to its highly addictive painkiller OxyContin. Under the plan, Purdue Pharma owner, the Sackler family, will be free from any liability and the company will be reorganised as the public-benefit firm Knoa Pharma.

The article highlights the implication of the abortion law passed in Texas in 2021. Topics discussed include the provision of the law that allows private citizens to file a lawsuit against individuals who aids or abets the abortion of a fetus from six weeks' gestation, concerns of abortion clinic workers on the threat of lawsuit posed by the law, and significance of the plan of the Supreme Court to decide on the Mississippi abortion law in May 2022.

The article discusses a study on the influence of elections of U.S. judges on their sentencing practices. The study was conducted by Christian Dippel of the UCLA Anderson School of Management in California and Michael Poyker of Columbia Business School in New York City. It revealed the concerns of opponents of judicial elections, including the possibility that judges will rule more favorably to those who contributed to their campaigns.

The article reports on a ruling by the Court of Appeal in London, England in favour of a coalition of groups that oppose the expansion of Heathrow Airport on grounds of climate, noise, air pollution and economic growth.

The article discusses the scenario in South Africa where the courts and judges are finding it difficult to make the government led by president Jacob Zuma, uphold the laws and constitution. It cites the case where the court questioned the legality of the government awarding a contract to Cash Paymaster Services to manage payment of pensions and social grants. The government was asked to award a new and transparent contract for the same from April 2017 but it has managed to defy the court ruling

The article discusses the French Court of Justice of the Republic's guilty judgment against the head of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) Christine Lagarde for negligence during her tenure as the finance minister of France.

The article discusses the ruling issued by the Supreme Court of India on the constitutionality of the biometric identification scheme Aadhaar. Topics explored include the favorable acknowledgment of the court decision by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), the outlook issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) for the implementation of Aadhaar, and the need for the public to utilize Aadhaar to gain access to government services.

The article focuses on the decision of the supreme court in Brazil on the corruption case involving former president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. Topics discussed include the anti-corruption probe Lava Jato (CarWash) which disclosed massive graft in politics and business, corruption case of the Workers' Party (PT), and charges and convictions of Da Silva.

The article discusses the mission of Saqib Nisar, chief justice of the Pakistani Supreme Court, to deliver clean air, clean water and pure milk to Pakistan through the court's rulings. Nisar is recognized for overturning the court's previously pliant reputation. The stance of opposition politicians on the mission of the judge is also discussed.

The article reports that according to a study published in the journal "Science Advances," researchers have developed the computer program COMPAS, which is based on the logic of an algorithm and has been trained with a vast amount of data, and can make judgments without being biased.

The article focuses on opening of the Supreme Court's term in October 6, 2014 and examines the cases they will hear in 2014-2015. Topics include the Court's cases on same-sex marriage, the definition of unreasonable search and seizure, and the limits to a prisoner's religious liberty. Other cases include electoral redistricting in Alabama and employer accommodation for pregnant women.

The article talks about the influence that court rulings in Taiwan and Hong Kong regarding homosexual rights can have mainland China. Topics discussed include the ruling from Taiwan's highest court on May 24, 2017 to grant marriage rights to homosexuals, the increasing public display of homosexuality in China, and the views of Li Yinhe, a sociologist at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, on it.

The article focuses on the Canadian Supreme Court decision regarding the Tsilhqot'in First Nation Indians' claim to land in the western area of British Columbia. Topics include the Supreme Court's judgment stating that the First Indians owned the land due to a charter proclaimed by King George III in 1763, how the judgment will impact natural resources development in the region, and the Tsilhqot'in's disapproval of the Northern Gateway pipeline.

The article looks at same-sex marriage in the U.S., reporting on recent state court rulings overturning same-sex marriage prohibitions in states including Virginia, Utah, and Oklahoma, and noting that public opinion on the issue has shifted over the past decade. The U.S. Supreme Court's 2013 decision regarding the U.S. Defense of Marriage Act and the likelihood of future U.S. Supreme Court cases on the issue are discussed.

The article focuses on the International Criminal Court's (ICC) decision regarding Congolese warlord Thomas Lubanga Dyilo. Information is provided on the decision, which occurred on March 14, 2012. The author discusses the importance of the case, the first case decided by the ICC, because there was little operational structure and no precedent.

The article discusses a ruling by U.S. district court judge Roger Vinson ruling a 2010 law on medical care and health insurance unconstitutional. The possibility the ruling could be used by state governments to delay implementing the law during continued litigation is discussed. It is noted that district court judges have both upheld and struck down the law, and that their decisions reflected the political party of the President who appointed them.

The author reports on suspected arms dealer Viktor Bout. Topics discussed in the article include problems that exist in extraditing Bout to the U.S. from Thailand, crimes that Bout has been accused of and the impact that terrorist attacks in 2001 had on the U.S. government not capturing Bout earlier.

The article examines a July 22, 2010 judgment by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) which stated that Kosovo's 2008 declaration of independence from Serbia did not violate international law. International recognition of Kosovo's sovereignty, which is not universal, is discussed. Serbia's reaction to the judgment, which was muted, is considered.

A letter to the editor is presented in response to an article about the ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague on Taiwan's territorial claim of Taiping Island in the South China Sea, which appeared in the July 30, 2016 issue.

The article presents the court case in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against defendant Edward Strieff, who questioned the way he was arrested and searched by South Salt Lake City, Utah detective Doug Fackrell. In the case, Utah v. Strieff, Strieff was arrested for a standing warrant for a traffic violation, and yielded drug paraphernalia and the illegal drug methamphetamine when searched. The court's ruling was written by Justice Clarence Thomas.

The article discusses the impact that having eight U.S. Supreme Court Justices has on the legal cases they hear and legal procedures, including their reduced docket for the October 2016 term, the ideological left and right split and their rulings, or judgements.

The article reports on the unpredictability of the electoral court ruling on the presidential bid of non-traditional politician and candidate Julio Guzmán, in Peru. The inexperienced politician Guzmán was fielded as the candidate of the small and dormant political party Everyone for Peru, but came close to beating the frontrunner Keiko Fujimori. However, the candidacy of Guzmán still awaits the decision over the administrative ruling of the electoral court.

The article reports that nine justices of the U.S. Supreme Court ruled to on hold the flagship environmental policy of the U.S. President Barack Obama, particularly the effort to cut carbon dioxide emissions (CO2) from power plants.

The article examines a judgment by Germany's Constitutional Court that the European Union (EU)'s political institutions did not meet the democratic requirements of Germany's constitution, and ordering Germany's legislature to create a law giving the country more power in EU government. The judgment complicates Chancellor Angela Merkel's efforts to have EU members ratify a treaty expanding EU authority.

The article focuses on an April 22, 2009 judgment by an appellate court in Hong Kong, China, against financier Richard Li's attempt to rake the telecommunication company PCCW private. The court ruled that Li's offer violated the rights of the company's stockholders, invalidating a securities law allowing large, family-owned corporations to split up their holdings during proxy votes, maximizing their influence.

The article reports that the Constitutional Court of Germany has significant power in Germany and in the European Union (EU). The Constitutional Court is in the process of deciding whether to adopt EU policies in Germany. The court is expected to approve some measures created by the EU, but some Germans fear that the EU will not represent German interests.

The article examines a December 4, 2008 ruling by the European Court of Human Rights that persons who are acquitted of a crime or have charges dropped are entitled to have any DNA samples they provided police to be destroyed. The ruling will have a significant impact in Great Britain, where some 850,000 such persons are in the country's DNA database.

The article reports that Turkey's constitutional court refused to ban the ruling AK party, a moderate Islamic political party, on the grounds it had violated the country's secular constitution, allowing Prime Minister Recip Tayyip Erdogan to remain in office. Secular powers, including the armed forces, are said to recognize attempts to replace the government by extralegal means would harm Turkey's economy and its efforts to join the European Union.

The article focuses on a February 20, 2008 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that makers of medical instruments and apparatus which are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are immune from product liability lawsuits in state courts. The ruling is seen as a boon to the medical apparatus industry, which is one of the fastest growing sectors of the health care industry.

The article reports on trends in class action lawsuits filed by shareholders of large corporations in the U.S. The number of class-action suits in 2006 was much lower than the average for previous years, but the claims were much larger. The article cites the example of class-action suits led by CalPERS, a pension fund.

This article reports on the 2006 Supreme Court ruling regarding the legal status of the detainees held by the U.S. military in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. The court declared that the special military tribunals set up to try suspected foreign terrorists in the camp were unlawful under both the Geneva Conventions and American law. The administration of president George W. Bush intends to change the system rather than abolish it. The decision limited presidential power, preserved the constitutional safeguards of civil liberty and entitled combatants protection under the Geneva Conventions.

The article argues that Judge Samuel Alito will prevail in being confirmed for the United States Supreme Court. That the Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee are giving Alito a hard time shows how high the stakes are. If he is as conservative as one expects a President George W. Bush nominee to be, he would shift the court significantly rightwards. Alito's record on the bench is one of cautious rulings and scrupulous deference to precedent. Of the many areas where Alito's views will matter, two stand out: abortion and executive power.

The article discusses backlash over a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that allows the government to seize private property. If you ever doubted the importance of the Supreme Court, consider the fuss about Kelo v New London. The five-to-four ruling by the court on June 23, 2005, apparently giving the government the power to bulldoze homes on flimsy grounds, has set off fiery protests across the country. Americans used to believe that their constitution protected private property. The Fifth Amendment allows the state to seize it only for "public use", and so long as "just compensation" is paid. "Public use" has traditionally been taken to mean something like a public highway. Roads would obviously be much harder to build if a single homeowner could hold out forever or for excessive compensation. The government's powers of "eminent domain" have also been used to clean up "blighted" slums. Kelo was about something different, however. A private developer in New London, Connecticut, wanted to raze some perfectly nice waterfront homes to build an office block and some posh apartments. The owners didn't want to sell. The city decided to force them to, calculating that the new development would create jobs and yield more taxes. The Supreme Court took the city's side. The backlash began immediately. Dissenting justices such as Sandra Day O'Connor (who retired in July) pointed out what extraordinary powers the court had just granted the government. Seven days later, by a ten-to-one margin, the Republican House of Representatives passed a motion disagreeing with the court. A constitutional amendment to overrule Kelo is before the House, while a bill that would have a similar effect is before the Senate.

The article focuses on the left-wing reaction to the nomination of John G. Roberts to the United States Supreme Court. It's a bit like trying to prosecute a mob boss. You know he's a bad guy because he hangs out with other bad guys. But you can't prove it because no one outside that tight-knit group has actually heard him give the order to shake down the local casino or fit a rival with concrete boots. Left-wing activists are sure they don't like Roberts, the man President George Bush nominated on July 19, 2005 for the Supreme Court. He must be a right-wing extremist because he is a member of the Federalist Society (a group of conservative lawyers) and, of course, because U.S. President George W. Bush nominated him. But there is not much evidence of Roberts's alleged extremism. He has been a judge on the Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia for a mere two years, during which time he has offered few controversial opinions about anything.

The article focuses on Arthur Anderson, the auditing firm that was found guilty of witness tampering in connection with the Enron scandal. Few who had followed proceedings in the United States Supreme Court were surprised when, on May 31st, the justices overturned the 2002 conviction of Arthur Andersen. The Supreme Court was vexed by the judge's instructions to the Texas jury in the 2002 trial. They were too broad, wrote Chief Justice William Rehnquist in the opinion, and could result in the criminalisation of innocent conduct. However, the justices stopped short of exonerating the former accounting giant. In theory, it should be retried under a stricter standard, but this is unlikely. The Supreme Court said that the government should have been held to a higher standard of proof. Specifically, it needed to show a "consciousness of wrongdoing" and a connection between the order to shred documents and knowledge of a particular proceeding.

The article discusses the drug conviction of Schapelle Corby, a 27-year-old beautician trainee from Queensland, Australia, who was found guilty of smuggling marijuana into Bali and sentenced to 20 years in prison. Outrage exploded in Australia. Polls indicate that 90% of Australians think Corby is innocent. Some called for an Australian boycott of Bali as a tourist destination; others called on the conservative coalition government, led by John Howard, to suspend aid to Indonesia. Much about Corby's story remains a mystery. Anti-Indonesian feelings around the Corby affair turned nasty when an envelope containing a biological agent arrived at the Indonesian embassy in Canberra. Though Howard said he was appalled and promptly apologised on behalf of Australia, and the substance appeared to be harmless, it was all a far cry from Australians' generosity following the tsunami last December.

The article focuses on investment bank Morgan Stanley, which is facing an attempt by dissident former managers to unseat its chief executive. On May 16th the investment bank was ordered by a Florida court to pay $604 million for defrauding Ronald Perelman, one of America's smartest and richest investors. Perelman contended that Morgan Stanley had misled him in 1998 when he agreed to accept shares in its client, appliance manufacturer Sunbeam, in exchange for his controlling interest in Coleman, a supplier of camping equipment. In a pre-trial ruling, the judge, Elizabeth Maass instructed the jury that the bank had conspired with Sunbeam to defraud Perelman. Morgan Stanley had consistently failed to turn over internal e-mails. As the bank had done in other investigations, it blamed the omissions on computer errors. In Perelman it faced an adversary who was implacable, well represented and determined to extract more than a token settlement; past opponents, mainly regulators, have been more easily satisfied. Worse still for the bank, it faced a judge who found its delays and evasive answers to requests intolerable.

The article reports on a ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court. Clint Bolick is one of the successful lawyers in a ruling this week, which freed up wine sales in New York and Michigan. The court ruled that states which allow their residents to buy wine directly from in-state producers cannot stop them buying wine directly from sellers from other states. The decision is a victory for small vineyards, which currently struggle to compete with the "three-tier system" that dominates the market. As Kathleen Sullivan, who argued one of the cases before the court, explained, the 21st amendment which ended Prohibition involved a "classic clash" of constitutional principles: the guarantee of free trade under the commerce clause versus the guarantee of states' rights. What happens next? In theory, state legislatures could now cite the decision to ban all direct sales. That would be the protectionist option--though it is also favored by some people who are worried by under-age drinking. In practice, though, the states are likely to open up.

The article focuses on Bernie Ebbers who was charged with fraud in the WorldCom scandal. On March 15th it was that sense of disbelief which, after eight days of deliberation, led the jury to find the former boss of WorldCom guilty of fraud, conspiracy and filing false documents with regulators in relation to the $11 billion accounting fraud that brought the telecoms giant crashing down in America's biggest-ever bankruptcy. The conviction of Mr Ebbers is by far the most significant yet in America's latest crusade against corporate crime. An initial bout of post-Enron public fury had died down, and attempts to reform corporate governance and accounting--notably the Sarbanes-Oxley legislation then before Congress--were losing momentum. WorldCom changed all that, by convincing the American public that Enron was not a solitary event, and convincing congressmen and the Bush administration that, with mid-term elections looming, they would pay a political price if they did nothing. Mr Ebbers had argued that, although a massive fraud took place, it was masterminded by Scott Sullivan, WorldCom's chief financial officer, and that he was unaware of it. A former milkman with no formal training in accounting, Mr Ebbers claimed that he was incapable of spotting the fraud. Views such as Mr Wright's--and the judge's clarification that concluding that Mr Ebbers knowingly turned a blind eye to Mr Sullivan's creative accounting was enough to find him guilty--carried the day.