425 results
Search Results
2. Is It Just for a Screening Program to Give People All the Information They Want?
- Author
-
Dive, Lisa, Holmes, Isabella, and Newson, Ainsley J.
- Subjects
PUBLIC health surveillance ,GENETIC testing ,PUBLIC health ,GENETIC variation ,GENETIC carriers ,PATIENTS' attitudes ,ACCESS to information ,GENOMICS ,BIOETHICS ,ETHICS - Abstract
Genomic screening at population scale generates many ethical considerations. One is the normative role that people's preferences should play in determining access to genomic information in screening contexts, particularly information that falls beyond the scope of screening. We expect both that people will express a preference to receive such results and that there will be interest from the professional community in providing them. In this paper, we consider this issue in relation to the just and equitable design of population screening programs like reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS). Drawing on a pluralistic public health ethics perspective, we claim that generating and reporting information about genetic variants beyond the scope of the screening program usually lacks clinical, and perhaps personal, utility. There are both pragmatic and ethical reasons to restrict information provision to that which fits the stated purpose of the program. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Criteria for Authorship in Bioethics.
- Author
-
Resnik, DavidB. and Master, Zubin
- Subjects
SERIAL publications ,AUTHORSHIP ,ETHICS ,EXPERIMENTAL design ,RESEARCH ethics ,RESPONSIBILITY - Abstract
Multiple authorship is becoming increasingly common in bioethics research. There are well-established criteria for authorship in empirical bioethics research but not for conceptual research. It is important to develop criteria for authorship in conceptual publications to prevent undeserved authorship and uphold standards of fairness and accountability. This article explores the issue of multiple authorship in bioethics and develops criteria for determining who should be an author on a conceptual publication in bioethics. Authorship in conceptual research should be based on contributing substantially to: (1) identifying a topic, problem, or issue to study; (2) reviewing and interpreting the relevant literature; (3) formulating, analyzing, and evaluating arguments that support one or more theses; (4) responding to objections and counterarguments; and (5) drafting the manuscript and approving the final version. Authors of conceptual publications should participate substantially in at least two of areas (1)–(5). [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Solidarity and Community Engagement in Global Health Research.
- Author
-
Pratt, Bridget, Cheah, Phaik Yeong, and Marsh, Vicki
- Subjects
EMPATHY ,ETHICS ,GOAL (Psychology) ,INTERPERSONAL relations ,INTERPROFESSIONAL relations ,MEDICAL research ,RECOGNITION (Psychology) ,WORLD health ,COMMUNITY support ,SOCIAL support - Abstract
Community engagement (CE) is gaining prominence in global health research. A number of ethical goals–spanning the instrumental, intrinsic, and transformative–have been ascribed to CE in global health research. This paper draws attention to an additional transformative value that CE is not typically linked to but that seems very relevant: solidarity. Both are concerned with building relationships and connecting parties that are distant from one another. This paper first argues that furthering solidarity should be recognized as another ethical goal for CE in global health research. It contends that, over time, CE can build the bases of solidaristic relationships—moral imagination, recognition, understanding, empathy—between researchers and community members. Applying concepts from existing accounts of solidarity, the paper develops preliminary ideas about who should be engaged and how to advance solidarity. The proposed approach is compared to current CE practice in global health research. Finally, the paper briefly considers how solidaristic CE could affect how global health research is performed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Should the Use of Adaptive Machine Learning Systems in Medicine be Classified as Research?
- Author
-
Sparrow, Robert, Hatherley, Joshua, Oakley, Justin, and Bain, Chris
- Abstract
AbstractA novel advantage of the use of machine learning (ML) systems in medicine is their potential to continue learning from new data after implementation in clinical practice. To date, considerations of the ethical questions raised by the design and use of adaptive machine learning systems in medicine have, for the most part, been confined to discussion of the so-called “update problem,” which concerns how regulators should approach systems whose performance and parameters continue to change even after they have received regulatory approval. In this paper, we draw attention to a prior ethical question: whether the continuous learning that will occur in such systems after their initial deployment should be classified, and regulated, as medical research? We argue that there is a strong
prima facie case that the use of continuous learning in medical ML systems should be categorized, and regulated, as research and that individuals whose treatment involves such systems should be treated as research subjects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Conversational Artificial Intelligence in Psychotherapy: A New Therapeutic Tool or Agent?
- Author
-
Sedlakova, Jana and Trachsel, Manuel
- Subjects
MENTAL illness treatment ,SOCIAL support ,CONVERSATION ,USER interfaces ,SELF-perception ,ARTIFICIAL intelligence ,HEALTH literacy ,MEDICAL ethics ,PSYCHOTHERAPY ,THERAPEUTIC alliance - Abstract
Conversational artificial intelligence (CAI) presents many opportunities in the psychotherapeutic landscape—such as therapeutic support for people with mental health problems and without access to care. The adoption of CAI poses many risks that need in-depth ethical scrutiny. The objective of this paper is to complement current research on the ethics of AI for mental health by proposing a holistic, ethical, and epistemic analysis of CAI adoption. First, we focus on the question of whether CAI is rather a tool or an agent. This question serves as a framework for the subsequent ethical analysis of CAI focusing on topics of (self-) knowledge, (self-)understanding, and relationships. Second, we propose further conceptual and ethical analysis regarding human-AI interaction and argue that CAI cannot be considered as an equal partner in a conversation as is the case with a human therapist. Instead, CAI's role in a conversation should be restricted to specific functions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Secular Clinical Ethicists Should Not Be Neutral Toward All Religious Beliefs: An Argument for a Moral-Metaphysical Proceduralism.
- Author
-
Brummett, Abram L.
- Subjects
ETHICS ,RELIGION & medicine ,HARM reduction ,ETHICISTS ,PSYCHOSOCIAL factors ,HEALTH attitudes ,MEDICAL ethics ,CULTURAL competence ,CONSCIENCE ,COMMITMENT (Psychology) ,REFUSAL to treat - Abstract
Secular clinical ethics has responded to the problem of moral pluralism with a procedural approach. However, defining this term stirs debate: H. Tristram Engelhardt Jr. has championed a contentless proceduralism (P1), while others, conversely, argue for a proceduralism that permits some content in the form of moral claims (P2). This paper argues that the content P2 permits ought to be expanded to include some metaphysical commitments, in an approach referred to as P2+. The need for P2+ is demonstrated by analyzing and rejecting three standards (the best interest or harm principle, internal reasonability, and the child's right to an open future) used by P2 to justify overriding religiously motivated refusals of treatment for children. These approaches fail because each maintains a neutral stance regarding the truth of religious belief. This paper drives at the broader thesis that the proceduralism of secular clinical ethics requires some moral and metaphysical commitments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Spheres of Morality: The Ethical Codes of the Medical Profession.
- Author
-
Doernberg, Samuel and Truog, Robert
- Subjects
- *
MEDICINE , *PROFESSIONAL ethics , *ETHICS , *CODES of ethics , *PROFESSIONS , *ETHICAL decision making , *MEDICAL care , *CONFLICT of interests , *SOCIAL boundaries , *MEDICAL ethics , *PHYSICIANS , *POPULATION health , *BIOETHICS - Abstract
The medical profession contains five "spheres of morality": clinical care, clinical research, scientific knowledge, population health, and the market. These distinct sets of normative commitments require physicians to act in different ways depending on the ends of the activity in question. For example, a physician-scientist emphasizes patients' well-being in clinic, prioritizes the scientific method in lab, and seeks to maximize shareholder returns as a board member of a pharmaceutical firm. Physicians increasingly occupy multiple roles in healthcare and move between them frequently, creating the possibility of conflict between the ethical obligations of their various roles. This paper examines the entire moral landscape of medicine through the lens of role morality. It develops a novel framework that helps physicians recognize how their moral commitments depend on the nature and context of the situation, clarifies ethical conflicts that physicians face, and concludes with ideas for resolving these conflicts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Human Germline Genome Editing: On the Nature of Our Reasons to Genome Edit.
- Author
-
Sparrow, Robert
- Subjects
HUMAN genome ,MEDICAL technology ,GENETIC engineering ,HUMAN reproductive technology ,BIOETHICS ,HEALTH planning - Abstract
Ever since the publication of Derek Parfit's Reasons and Persons, bioethicists have tended to distinguish between two different ways in which reproductive technologies may have implications for the welfare of future persons. Some interventions harm or benefit particular individuals: they are "person affecting." Other interventions determine which individual, of a number of possible individuals, comes into existence: they are "identity affecting" and raise the famous "non-identity problem." For the past several decades, bioethical debate has, for the most part, proceeded on the assumption that direct genetic modification of human embryos would be person affecting. In this paper, I argue that that genome editing is highly unlikely to be person affecting for the foreseeable future and, as a result, will neither benefit nor harm edited individuals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Two Minds, One Patient: Clearing up Confusion About "Ambivalence".
- Author
-
Moore, Bryanna, Nelson, Ryan H., Ubel, Peter A., and Blumenthal-Barby, Jennifer
- Subjects
PATIENT decision making ,UNCERTAINTY ,PSYCHOLOGY ,PATIENT psychology ,PATIENTS' attitudes ,PSYCHOSOCIAL factors ,THEORY ,MEDICAL ethics ,PHILOSOPHY - Abstract
Patients who experience difficulty making medical decisions are often referred to as "ambivalent." However, the current lack of attention to the nuances between a cluster of phenomena that resemble ambivalence means that we are not always recognizing what is really going on with a patient. Importantly, different kinds of "ambivalence" may call for different approaches. In this paper, we present a taxonomy of ambivalence-related phenomena, provide normative analysis of some of the effects of—and common responses to—such mental states, and sketch some practical strategies for addressing ambivalence. In applying lessons from the philosophical literature and decision theory, our aim is to provide ethicists and clinicians with the tools to better understand and effectively intervene in cases of ambivalence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Agent-Regret in Healthcare.
- Author
-
Enck, Gavin and Condley, Beth
- Abstract
Abstract For healthcare professionals and organizations, there is an emphasis on addressing moral distress and compassion fatigue among clinicians. While addressing these issues is vital, this paper suggests that the philosophical concept of agent-regret is a relevant but overlooked issue in healthcare. To experience agent-regret is to regret your harmful but not wrongful actions. This person’s action results in someone being killed or significantly injured, but it was ethically faultless. Despite being faultless, agent-regret is an emotional response concerning one’s agency in a situation that results in death or significant harm. In healthcare, many clinicians are likely to experience regret for faultless actions that significantly harm or cause the death of a patient. The recognition of agent-regret in healthcare is significant because it differs, conceptually and practically, from moral distress and compassion fatigue. Building on the work of Wojtowicz (2022), we should strive to understand clinicians’ agent-regret by recognizing their agency in the situation, not lessening or removing it. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Ethics Education for Healthcare Professionals in the Era of ChatGPT and Other Large Language Models: Do We Still Need It?
- Author
-
Rahimzadeh, Vasiliki, Kostick-Quenet, Kristin, Blumenthal Barby, Jennifer, and McGuire, Amy L.
- Subjects
- *
ETHICS , *PROFESSIONS , *DIGITAL technology , *MATHEMATICAL models , *INTERNET , *ARTIFICIAL intelligence , *LANGUAGE & languages , *MACHINE learning , *THEORY , *PROFESSIONAL competence , *GOAL (Psychology) - Abstract
In this paper, we contend with whether we still need traditional ethics education as part of healthcare professional training given the abilities of chatGPT (generative pre-trained transformer) and other large language models (LLM). We reflect on common programmatic goals to assess the current strengths and limitations of LLMs in helping to build ethics competencies among future clinicians. Through an actual case analysis, we highlight areas in which chatGPT and other LLMs are conducive to common bioethics education goals. We also comment on where such technologies remain an imperfect substitute for human-led ethics teaching and learning. Finally, we conclude that the relative strengths of chatGPT warrant its consideration as a teaching and learning tool in ethics education in ways that account for current limitations and build in flexibility as the technology evolves. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. AUTOGEN: A Personalized Large Language Model for Academic Enhancement—Ethics and Proof of Principle.
- Author
-
Porsdam Mann, Sebastian, Earp, Brian D., Møller, Nikolaj, Vynn, Suren, and Savulescu, Julian
- Subjects
- *
PUBLISHING , *LABOR productivity , *NATURAL language processing , *ARTIFICIAL intelligence , *ACADEMIC achievement , *PHILOSOPHY of education , *AUTOMATION , *AUTHORSHIP - Abstract
In this article, we explore the potential of enhancing academic prose and idea generation by fine-tuning a large language model (here, GPT-3) on one's own previously published writings: AUTOGEN ("AI Unique Tailored Output GENerator"). We develop, test, and describe three distinct AUTOGEN models trained on the prior scholarly output of three of the current authors (SBM, BDE, JS), with a fourth model trained on the combined works of all three. Our AUTOGEN models demonstrate greater variance in quality than the base GPT-3 model, with many outputs outperforming the base model in format, style, overall quality, and novel idea generation. As proof of principle, we present and discuss examples of AUTOGEN-written sections of existing and hypothetical research papers. We further discuss ethical opportunities, concerns, and open questions associated with personalized academic prose and idea generators. Ethical opportunities for personalized LLMs such as AUTOGEN include increased productivity, preservation of writing styles and cultural traditions, and aiding consensus building. However, ethical concerns arise due to the potential for personalized LLMs to reduce output diversity, violate privacy and intellectual property rights, and facilitate plagiarism or fraud. The use of coauthored or multiple-source trained models further complicates issues surrounding ownership and attribution. Open questions concern a potential credit-blame asymmetry for LLM outputs, the legitimacy of licensing agreements in authorship ascription, and the ethical implications of coauthorship attribution for data contributors. Ensuring the output is sufficiently distinct from the source material is crucial to maintaining ethical standards in academic writing. These opportunities, risks, and open issues highlight the intricate ethical landscape surrounding the use of personalized LLMs in academia. We also discuss open technical questions concerning the integration of AUTOGEN-style personalized LLMs with other LLMs, such as GPT-4, for iterative refinement and improvement of generated text. In conclusion, we argue that AUTOGEN-style personalized LLMs offer significant potential benefits in terms of both prose generation and, to a lesser extent, idea generation. If associated ethical issues are appropriately addressed, AUTOGEN alone or in combination with other LLMs can be seen as a potent form of academic enhancement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Moral Distress in Scientific Research.
- Author
-
Resnik, David B.
- Subjects
AUTHORSHIP ,ETHICS ,MENTORING ,PROFESSIONAL ethics ,PSYCHOLOGICAL stress ,SUPERVISION of employees ,WHISTLEBLOWING ,PSYCHOLOGY of Research personnel - Abstract
The article discusses the broad definition of moral distress with reference to the article "A Broader Understanding of Moral Distress" by Stephen M. Campbell, Connie M. Ulrich and Christine Grady in the same issue. Topics covered include the traditional view of moral distress, the expanded definition of moral distress based on various situations in scientific research, and the need for additional empirical and conceptual research on moral distress.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Identifying Ethical Considerations for Machine Learning Healthcare Applications.
- Author
-
Char, Danton S., Abràmoff, Michael D., and Feudtner, Chris
- Subjects
ALGORITHMS ,ARTIFICIAL intelligence ,CONCEPTUAL structures ,MACHINE learning ,MEDICAL care ,MEDICAL informatics ,ARTIFICIAL neural networks ,PATIENT safety ,TECHNOLOGY - Abstract
Along with potential benefits to healthcare delivery, machine learning healthcare applications (ML-HCAs) raise a number of ethical concerns. Ethical evaluations of ML-HCAs will need to structure the overall problem of evaluating these technologies, especially for a diverse group of stakeholders. This paper outlines a systematic approach to identifying ML-HCA ethical concerns, starting with a conceptual model of the pipeline of the conception, development, implementation of ML-HCAs, and the parallel pipeline of evaluation and oversight tasks at each stage. Over this model, we layer key questions that raise value-based issues, along with ethical considerations identified in large part by a literature review, but also identifying some ethical considerations that have yet to receive attention. This pipeline model framework will be useful for systematic ethical appraisals of ML-HCA from development through implementation, and for interdisciplinary collaboration of diverse stakeholders that will be required to understand and subsequently manage the ethical implications of ML-HCAs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Marginally Represented Patients and the Moral Authority of Surrogates.
- Author
-
Berger, Jeffrey T.
- Subjects
AUTHORITY ,BIOETHICS ,ETHICS ,ETHICAL decision making - Abstract
Incapacitated adult patients are commonly divided into two groups for purposes of decision making; those with a surrogate and those without. Respectively, these groups are often referred to as represented and unrepresented, and the relative ethics of decision making between them raises two particular issues. The first issue involves the differential application of the best interests standard between groups. Second is the prevailing notion that representedness and unrepresentedness are categorical phenomena, though it is more aptly understood as a multidimensional and continuous variable based on relational moral authority. This paper examines the nature of representedness as it relates to ethical norms of surrogate decision making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. The Question of Method in Ethics Consultation.
- Author
-
Agich, George J.
- Subjects
ETHICS ,DISCIPLINE ,HISTORY - Abstract
This paper offers an exposition of what the question of method in ethics consultation involves under two conditions: when ethics consultation is regarded as a practice and when the question of method is treated systematically. It discusses the concept of the practice and the importance of rules in constituting the actions, cognition, and perceptions of practitioners. The main body of the paper focuses on three elements of the question of method: canon, discipline, and history, which are treated heuristically to outline what the question of method in ethics consultation fully involves. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2001
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. The AI Needed for Ethical Decision Making Does Not Exist.
- Author
-
Barwise, Amelia and Pickering, Brian
- Subjects
JUDGMENT (Psychology) ,ETHICS ,HEALTH services accessibility ,ETHICAL decision making ,ARTIFICIAL intelligence ,MACHINE learning ,HOLISTIC medicine ,ALGORITHMS ,BIOETHICS ,MEDICAL logic - Abstract
The authors comment on the study "Algorithms for Ethical Decision Making in the Clinic," wherein L. Meier and colleagues describe their approach to developing machine intelligence to support ethical decision-making in the clinic. Topics include poorly defined problem statement and inadequate consideration of constraints, heterogeneity and representatives of data sources used for training, and programmability of the ethical framework.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Is Multiple Authorship in Conceptual Bioethics Ethically Sustainable?
- Author
-
Jones, D.Gareth
- Subjects
AUTHORSHIP ,ETHICS ,EXPERIMENTAL design ,INTERPROFESSIONAL relations ,RESEARCH ethics ,SERIAL publications - Abstract
The article discusses the article "Criteria for Authorship in Bioethics," by D. B. Resnik and Z. Master. In the article the author offers opinions on several points which are raised in Resnik and Master's article and on the question of whether multiple authorship in conceptual bioethics can be ethically sustainable.
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. How Authorship Guidelines in Bioethics Can Ensure Fairness and Accountability.
- Author
-
Moffatt, Barton
- Subjects
MANUSCRIPTS ,AUTHORSHIP ,ETHICS ,EXPERIMENTAL design ,RESEARCH methodology ,RESEARCH ethics ,RESPONSIBILITY ,SERIAL publications - Abstract
The article discusses the article "Criteria for Authorship in Bioethics," by D. B. Resnik and Z. Master. In the article the author offers his opinions on several points that are raised in Resnik and Master's article, on authorship in bioethics research and on the role that authorship guidelines in bioethics research can play in ensuring fairness and accountability in bioethics research articles.
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "The Study of Socioethical Issues in Systems Biology".
- Author
-
O'Malley, MaureenA., Calvert, Jane, and Dupré, John
- Subjects
EDITORIALS ,GENOMICS ,BIOETHICS ,BIOLOGY ,ETHICS - Abstract
The authors present a response to commentaries about their article "The Socioethical Study of Systems Biology" in a 2007 issue. In their opinion, commentator Jason Scott Robert's outline of systems bioethics is a more detailed and encompassing schema than the one they had managed. They assert that the ethical, legal and social issues (ELSI) programmes of genomics enable people to understand what a systems biology socioethics could and might become.
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. It's Not the Growth Attenuation, It's the Sterilization!
- Author
-
Lantos, John
- Subjects
CARE of children with disabilities ,BIOETHICS ,ETHICS - Abstract
The article reviews the article "Ashley Revisited: A Response to the Critics," by D. S. Diekema and N. Fost in the January 1, 2010 issue of "American Journal of Bioethics."
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. Neuroethics and National Security.
- Author
-
Canli, Turhan, Brandon, Susan, Casebeer, William, Crowley, PhilipJ., DuRousseau, Don, Greely, HenryT., and Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
- Subjects
NATIONAL security ,NEUROLOGY ,NEUROSCIENCES ,ETHICS ,BRAIN mapping - Abstract
The article presents a paper that focuses on the probable uses of neuroscience research in the methods to issues regarding national security. The paper is divided into three parts, the first part providing a short overview of several key neuroscience brain mapping technologies. The second and last part respectively touches on the works using these technologies that are said to become relevant for future national security applications and the neuroethical challenges that come with them.
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Rescuing Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research: The Blastocyst Transfer Method.
- Author
-
Liao, S.Matthew
- Subjects
EMBRYONIC stem cell research ,HUMAN embryo research ,HUMAN embryology ,STEM cell research ,BLASTOCYST - Abstract
Despite the therapeutic potential of human embryonic stem (HES) cells, many people believe that HES cell research should be banned. The reason is that the present method of extracting HES cells involves the destruction of the embryo, which for many is the beginning of a person. This paper examines a number of compromise solutions such as parthenogenesis, the use of defective embryos, genetically creating a “pseudo embryo” that can never form a placenta, and determining embryo death, and argues that none of these proposals are likely to satisfy embryoists, that is, those who regard the embryo as a person. This paper then proposes a method of extracting HES cells, what might be called the Blastocyst Transfer Method, that meets the ethical requirements of embryoists, and it considers some possible concerns regarding this method. It concludes by encouraging future HES cell research to investigate this method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2005
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. Abortion and the Intersection of Ethics, Activism, and Politics.
- Author
-
Lanphier, Elizabeth
- Subjects
HEALTH services accessibility ,ETHICS ,BLACK people ,HISPANIC Americans ,ABORTION ,ATTITUDES toward abortion ,HEALTH equity ,REPRODUCTIVE rights - Abstract
The author comments on an article by Katie Watson in this issue which is said to be a call to bioethicists to recognize the ways people may have undervalued the moral status of women in analytic frameworks and to deliberately integrate women into every analysis of abortion clinics. Topics include the significance of abortion experience to abortion ethics, suggestion by Watson on framing the need for abortion care, and suggestion from Watson for bioethicists to manage competing aims and methods.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. On Authorship.
- Author
-
Miller, FranklinG.
- Subjects
MANUSCRIPTS ,AUTHORSHIP ,ETHICS ,EXPERIMENTAL design ,INTERPROFESSIONAL relations ,RESEARCH ,RESEARCH ethics ,SERIAL publications - Abstract
The article discusses the article "Criteria for Authorship in Bioethics," by D. B. Resnik and Z. Master. In the article the author offers his opinions on several points which are raised in Resnik and Master's article, on authorship in bioethics research articles, on the appropriate order of authors in a collaborative research paper and on mentors in bioethics research authorship.
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. Germline Manipulation and Our Future Worlds.
- Author
-
Harris, John
- Subjects
GERM cells ,GENETIC engineering ,CRISPRS ,GENETICS ethics ,GENETIC engineering policy ,MITOCHONDRIA ,HUMAN in vitro fertilization ,TRANSPLANTATION of organs, tissues, etc. ,GENETIC engineering & ethics ,INFORMED consent & ethics ,EMBRYOLOGY & ethics ,HUMAN research subjects ,GENETIC techniques ,EMBRYOLOGY ,BLASTOCYST ,HUMAN genome ,INTERGENERATIONAL relations ,TRANSFER RNA ,TRANSGENIC animals ,EPIGENOMICS ,ETHICS ,PSYCHOLOGY ,EQUIPMENT & supplies - Abstract
Two genetic technologies capable of making heritable changes to the human genome have revived interest in, and in some quarters a very familiar panic concerning, so-called germline interventions. These technologies are: most recently the use of CRISPR/Cas9 to edit genes in non-viable IVF zygotes and Mitochondrial Replacement Therapy (MRT) the use of which was approved in principle in a landmark vote earlier this year by the United Kingdom Parliament. The possibility of using either of these techniques in humans has encountered the most violent hostility and suspicion. However it is important to be aware that much of this hostility dates back to the fears associated with In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) and other reproductive technologies and by cloning; fears which were baseless at the time concerning both IVF and cloning the use of both of which have proved to be highly beneficial to humanity and which have been effectively regulated and controlled. This paper argues that CRISPR should by pursued through researh until it is safe enough for use in humans but there is no reason to suppose at this stage that such use will be unsafe or unethical (Collins 2015). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. Examining the Ethics of Clinical Use of Unproven Interventions Outside of Clinical Trials During the Ebola Epidemic.
- Author
-
Shah, Seema K., Wendler, David, and Danis, Marion
- Subjects
CLINICAL trials & ethics ,RESOURCE allocation ,EBOLA virus disease ,HEALTH services accessibility ,PHYSICIAN-patient relations ,RESEARCH ethics ,ETHICS ,INVESTIGATIONAL drugs ,THERAPEUTICS - Abstract
The recent Ebola outbreak in West Africa began in the spring of 2014 and has since caused the deaths of over 6,000 people. Since there are no approved treatments or prevention modalities specifically targeted at Ebola Virus Disease (EVD), debate has focused on whether unproven interventions should be offered to Ebola patients outside of clinical trials. Those engaged in the debate have responded rapidly to a complex and evolving crisis, however, and this debate has not provided much opportunity for in-depth analysis. Additionally, the existing literature on access to unproven therapies has focused on contexts like HIV/AIDS and oncology, which are very different than the Ebola epidemic. In this paper, we examine the ethical issues surrounding access to unproven therapies in the context of the recent Ebola outbreak to yield new insights about this controversial and unsettled issue. We argue first that, in this context, the interests of patients in obtaining access to unproven therapies are not fully aligned with the interests of their providers and drug developers. Second, we focus on the resource constraints facing providers, funders, and patients and conclude that they often counsel against the use of unproven interventions against EVD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. Ashley Revisited: A Response to the Peer Commentaries.
- Author
-
Diekema, DouglasS. and Fost, Norman
- Subjects
CARE of children with disabilities ,MEDICAL ethics ,BIOETHICS ,CHILDREN with developmental disabilities ,DEVELOPMENT of children with disabilities ,MEDICAL care ,ETHICS - Abstract
A response by Douglas S. Diekema and Norman Fost about their article "Ashley Revisited: A Response to the Critics," is presented. They emphasize that their goal for writing the paper was to encourage people to examine ethical issues raised by Ashley's case. They respond to issues including growth attenuation and medial uncertainty.
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. Revisiting Hume's Law.
- Author
-
Segal, StevenP. and Tauber, AlfredI.
- Subjects
OUTPATIENT services in psychiatric hospitals ,SCIENTISM ,ETHICS ,OUTPATIENT medical care ,EDITORIALS - Abstract
The article comments on the paper "The effectiveness and ethical justification of psychiatric outpatient commitment," by G.R. Zanni and P.F. Stavis. According to the author, the implicit scientism of the paper conflates a moral position about the ethical basis of parens patriae and the support derived from an empirical study. The author claims that the paper might justify involuntary outpatient civil commitment as a better clinical and economic outcome than the alternatives.
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
31. A Right to Genetic Family History.
- Author
-
Thomsen, Kyle
- Subjects
HEALTH equity ,ADOPTED children ,HUMAN rights ,GENETIC testing ,FAMILY history (Medicine) ,ETHICS - Abstract
The article discusses the importance of having the right to one's genetic family history (GFH) with reference to the article "Does Lack of 'Genetic-Relative Family Health History' Represent a Potentially Avoidable Health Disparity for Adoptees" by Thomas May and colleagues in the same issue. Topics covered include the concept of human rights based on the 2008 paper titled "On Human Rights," the importance of GFH in planning one's life pursuits, and the lack of GFH as a human right violation.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
32. Impairing Loyalty: Corporate Responsibility for Clinical Misadventure.
- Author
-
Kipnis, Kenneth
- Subjects
CONTRACTS & ethics ,INFORMED consent & ethics ,MARKETING ethics ,OVARIAN tumors ,PHYSICIAN-patient relations ,UTERINE fibroid treatment ,UTERINE surgery ,CORPORATIONS & ethics ,DISCLOSURE ,CONFLICT of interests ,TELECONFERENCING ,TRUST ,ETHICAL decision making ,FIDUCIARY responsibility ,SOCIAL responsibility ,ETHICS ,TUMOR risk factors - Abstract
A medical device manufacturer pays a surgeon to demonstrate a novel medical instrument in a live broadcast to an audience of specialists in another city. The surgical patient is unaware of the broadcast and unaware of the doctor's relationship with the manufacturer. It turns out that the patient required a different surgical approach to her condition-one that would not have allowed a demonstration of the instrument-and she later dies. The paper is an exploration of whether the manufacturer shares, along with the doctor, responsibility for the death of the patient. Three arguments for corporate responsibility are considered; two are criticized and the third is offered as sound. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
33. Assessing the Remedy: The Case for Contracts in Clinical Trials.
- Author
-
Edwards, SarahJ. L.
- Subjects
CLINICAL trials & ethics ,CONTRACTS & economics ,CONTRACTS & ethics ,INFORMED consent & ethics ,PATIENTS ,PHYSICIAN-patient relations ,ETHICAL decision making ,HUMAN research subjects ,RESEARCH ,PATIENT participation ,RESEARCH evaluation ,RESEARCH ethics ,RESPONSIBILITY ,INSTITUTIONAL review boards ,ETHICS ,SAFETY - Abstract
Current orthodoxy in research ethics assumes that subjects of clinical trials reserve rights to withdraw at any time and without giving any reason. This view sees the right to withdraw as a simple extension of the right to refuse to participate all together. In this paper, however, I suggest that subjects should assume some responsibilities for the internal validity of the trial at consent and that these responsibilities should be captured by contract. This would allow the researcher to impose a penalty on the subject if he were to withdraw without good reason and on a whim. This proposal still leaves open the possibility of withdrawing without penalty when it is in the subject's best interests to do so. Giving researchers recourse to legal remedy may now be necessary to protect the science, as existing methods used to increase retention are inadequate for one reason or another. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. Inefficacy Interim Monitoring Procedures in Randomized Clinical Trials: The Need to Report.
- Author
-
Korn, EdwardL. and Freidlin, Boris
- Subjects
RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,DECISION making ,EXPERIMENTAL design ,HEALTH outcome assessment ,RESEARCH ethics ,RESEARCH ,FUTILE medical care ,TREATMENT effectiveness ,HUMAN research subjects ,ETHICS ,SAFETY - Abstract
If definitive evidence concerning treatment effectiveness becomes available from an ongoing randomized clinical trial, then the trial could be stopped early, with the public release of results benefiting current and future patients. However, stopping an ongoing trial based on accruing outcome data requires methodological rigor to preserve validity of the trial conclusions. This has led to the use of formal interim monitoring procedures, which include inefficacy monitoring that will stop a trial early when the experimental treatment appears not to be working. For participants, inefficacy monitoring is especially important as it ensures that they are not being treated worse than if they had not enrolled on the trial. We discuss the importance of reporting with trial results the formal interim inefficacy monitoring guidelines that were utilized, and, if none were used, the reasons for their absence. A survey of two leading medical journals suggests that this is not current practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
35. A Life Worth Giving? The Threshold for Permissible Withdrawal of Life Support From Disabled Newborn Infants.
- Author
-
Wilkinson, DominicJames
- Subjects
LIFE support systems in critical care ,CEREBRAL palsy ,FUTILE medical care ,CONCEPTUAL structures ,DISCRIMINATION (Sociology) ,NEONATAL intensive care ,HEALTH outcome assessment ,PARENTS of children with disabilities ,QUALITY of life ,UNCERTAINTY ,ETHICAL decision making ,WELL-being ,TREATMENT effectiveness ,CHILDREN ,ETHICS ,PROGNOSIS - Abstract
When is it permissible to allow a newborn infant to die on the basis of their future quality of life? The prevailing official view is that treatment may be withdrawn only if the burdens in an infant's future life outweigh the benefits. In this paper I outline and defend an alternative view. On the Threshold View, treatment may be withdrawn from infants if their future well-being is below a threshold that is close to, but above the zero-point of well-being. I present four arguments in favor of the Threshold View, and identify and respond to several counterarguments. I conclude that it is justifiable in some circumstances for parents and doctors to decide to allow an infant to die even though the infant's life would be worth living. The Threshold View provides a justification for treatment decisions that is more consistent, more robust, and potentially more practical than the standard view. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
36. Rethinking Research Ethics.
- Author
-
Rhodes, Rosamond
- Subjects
THORACIC aneurysms ,AORTA surgery ,THERAPEUTICS ,MUSCLES ,MYASTHENIA gravis treatment ,THYMUS surgery ,MEDICAL research ethics ,RESEARCH ethics ,CONTROL (Psychology) ,AUTONOMY (Psychology) ,BENEVOLENCE ,CAPACITY (Law) ,CARDIOPULMONARY bypass ,CLINICAL medicine research ,DECEPTION ,DECISION making ,INFORMED consent (Medical law) ,PATIENT-family relations ,PARENTS ,PATIENTS ,RESPECT ,SOCIAL justice ,INSTITUTIONAL review boards ,GOVERNMENT regulation ,PATIENT refusal of treatment ,AT-risk people ,RESEARCH personnel ,HUMAN research subjects ,PATIENT selection ,PARTICIPANT-researcher relationships ,SURGERY ,LAW - Abstract
Contemporary research ethics policies started with reflection on the atrocities perpetrated upon concentration camp inmates by Nazi doctors. Apparently, as a consequence of that experience, the policies that now guide human subject research focus on the protection of human subjects by making informed consent the centerpiece of regulatory attention. I take the choice of context for policy design, the initial prioritization of informed consent, and several associated conceptual missteps, to have set research ethics off in the wrong direction. The aim of this paper is to sort out these confusions and their implications and to offer instead a straightforward framework for considering the ethical conduct of human subject research. In the course of this discussion I clarify different senses of autonomy that have been confounded and present more intelligible justifications for informed consent. I also take issue with several of the now accepted dogmas that govern research ethics. These include: the primacy of informed consent, the protection of the vulnerable, the substitution of beneficence for research's social purpose, and the introduction of an untenable distinction between innovation and research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
37. Emerging Neurotechnologies for Lie-Detection: Promises and Perils.
- Author
-
Wolpe, PaulRoot, Foster, KennethR., and Langleben, DanielD.
- Subjects
NEUROETHICS ,MAGNETIC resonance imaging ,DECEPTION ,BRAIN mapping ,ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY ,EXPERIMENTAL design ,MEDICAL ethics ,FORENSIC medicine ,PRIVACY ,PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY ,RESEARCH evaluation ,DISCLOSURE ,PREDICTIVE tests ,ETHICS - Abstract
Detection of deception and confirmation of truth telling with conventional polygraphy raised a host of technical and ethical issues. Recently, newer methods of recording electromagnetic signals from the brain show promise in permitting the detection of deception or truth telling. Some are even being promoted as more accurate than conventional polygraphy. While the new technologies raise issues of personal privacy, acceptable forensic application, and other social issues, the focus of this paper is the technical limitations of the developing technology. Those limitations include the measurement validity of the new technologies, which remains largely unknown. Another set of questions pertains to the psychological paradigms used to model or constrain the target behavior. Finally, there is little standardization in the field, and the vulnerability of the techniques to countermeasures is unknown. Premature application of these technologies outside of research settings should be resisted, and the social conversation about the appropriate parameters of its civil, forensic, and security use should begin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
38. Should Human Beings Have Sex? Sexual Dimorphism and Human Enhancement.
- Author
-
Sparrow, Robert
- Subjects
SEX preselection ,PARENTAL preferences for sex of children ,PREIMPLANTATION genetic diagnosis ,BIOETHICS ,MEDICAL technology ,GENDER - Abstract
Since the first sex reassignment operations were performed, individual sex has come to be, to some extent at least, a technological artifact. The existence of sperm sorting technology, and of prenatal determination of fetal sex via ultrasound along with the option of termination, means that we now have the power to choose the sex of our children. An influential contemporary line of thought about medical ethics suggests that we should use technology to serve the welfare of individuals and to remove limitations on the opportunities available to them. I argue that, if these are our goals, we may do well to move towards a “post sex” humanity. Until we have the technology to produce genuine hermaphrodites, the most efficient way to do this is to use sex selection technology to ensure that only girl children are born. There are significant restrictions on the opportunities available to men, around gestation, childbirth, and breast-feeding, which will be extremely difficult to overcome via social or technological mechanisms for the foreseeable future. Women also have longer life expectancies than men. Girl babies therefore have a significantly more “open” future than boy babies. Resisting the conclusion that we should ensure that all children are born the same sex will require insisting that sexual difference is natural to human beings and that we should not use technology to reshape humanity beyond certain natural limits. The real concern of my paper, then, is the moral significance of the idea of a normal human body in modern medicine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
39. Stem Cell Tourism and Doctors' Duties to Minors—A View From Canada.
- Author
-
Zarzeczny, Amy and Caulfield, Timothy
- Subjects
MEDICAL tourism ,STEM cell research ,STEM cell transplantation ,STEM cells ,MINORS ,HEALTH policy ,ETHICS ,MEDICAL care - Abstract
While the clinical promise of much stem cell research remains largely theoretical, patients are nonetheless pursuing unproven stem cell therapies in jurisdictions around the world—a phenomenon referred to as “stem cell tourism.” These treatments are generally advertised on a direct-to-consumer basis via the Internet. Research shows portrayals of stem cell medicine on such websites are overly optimistic and the claims made are unsubstantiated by published evidence. However, anecdotal evidence suggests that parents are pursing these “treatments” for their children, despite potential physical and financial risk. Physicians are in a unique position as they can be expected to be involved in, or privy to, such decisions. In this paper, we consider what duties physicians may have toward minor patients whose parents/guardians wish to engage in stem cell tourism on their behalf. We use the Canadian perspective to address the broadly relevant issues raised by this trend. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
40. Ashley Revisited: A Response to the Critics.
- Author
-
Diekema, DouglasS. and Fost, Norman
- Subjects
CHILDREN with developmental disabilities ,CARE of children with disabilities ,DEVELOPMENT of children with disabilities ,HYSTERECTOMY ,PUBERTY ,MEDICAL ethics ,BIOETHICS ,ETHICS - Abstract
The case of Ashley X involved a young girl with profound and permanent developmental disability who underwent growth attenuation using high-dose estrogen, a hysterectomy, and surgical removal of her breast buds. Many individuals and groups have been critical of the decisions made by Ashley's parents, physicians, and the hospital ethics committee that supported the decision. While some of the opposition has been grounded in distorted facts and misunderstandings, others have raised important concerns. The purpose of this paper is to provide a brief review of the case and the issues it raised, then address 25 distinct substantive arguments that have been proposed as reasons that Ashley's treatment might be unethical. We conclude that while some important concerns have been raised, the weight of these concerns is not sufficient to consider the interventions used in Ashley's case to be contrary to her best interests, nor are they sufficient to preclude similar use of these interventions in the future for carefully selected patients who might also benefit from them. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
41. Reviving the Conversation Around CPR/DNR.
- Author
-
Bishop, JeffreyP., Brothers, KyleB., Perry, JoshuaE., and Ahmad, Ayesha
- Subjects
CARDIAC arrest ,THERAPEUTICS ,DO-not-resuscitate orders ,CARDIOPULMONARY resuscitation ,MEDICAL care ,HOSPITALS ,ETHICS - Abstract
This paper examines the historical rise of both cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and the do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order and the wisdom of their continuing status in U.S. hospital practice and policy. The practice of universal presumed consent to CPR and the resulting DNR policy are the products of a particular time and were responses to particular problems. In order to keep the excesses of technology in check, the DNR policies emerged as a response to the in-hospital universal presumed consent to CPR. We live with this historical concretion, which seems to perpetuate a false culture that the patient's wishes must be followed. The authors are critical of the current U.S. climate, where CPR and DNR are viewed as two among a panoply of patient choices, and point to UK practice as an alternative. They conclude that physicians in the United States should radically rethink approaches to CPR and DNR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
42. Rethinking Research Ethics.
- Author
-
Rhodes, Rosamond
- Subjects
RESEARCH ethics ,ATROCITIES ,MEDICAL experimentation on humans ,INFORMED consent (Medical law) ,RESEARCH - Abstract
Contemporary research ethics policies started with reflection on the atrocities perpetrated upoconcentration camp inmates by Nazi doctors. Apparently, as a consequence of that experience, the policies that now guide human subject research focus on the protection of human subjects by making informed consent the centerpiece of regulatory attention. I take the choice of context for policy design, the initial prioritization of informed consent, and several associated conceptual missteps, to have set research ethics off in the wrong direction. The aim of this paper is to sort out these confusions and their implications and to offer instead a straightforward framework for considering the ethical conduct of human subject research. In the course of this discussion I clarify different senses of autonomy that have been confounded and present more intelligible justifications for informed consent. I also take issue with several of the now accepted dogmas that govern research ethics. These include: the primacy of informed consent, the protection of the vulnerable, the substitution of beneficence for research's social purpose, and the introduction of an untenable distinction between innovation and research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2005
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
43. Preconception Gender Selection.
- Author
-
Robertson, John A.
- Subjects
SEX preselection ,REPRODUCTION ,COUPLES ,ETHICS - Abstract
Safe and effective methods of preconception gender selection through flow cytometric separation of X- and Y-bearing sperm could greatly increase the use of gender selection by couples contemplating reproduction. Such a development raises ethical, legal, and social issues about the impact of such practices on offspring, on sex ratio imbalances, and on sexism and the status of women. This paper analyzes the competing interests in preconception gender selection, and concludes that its use to increase gender variety in a family, and possibly for selecting the gender of firstborn, might in many instances be ethically acceptable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2001
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
44. From Bridge to Destination? Ethical Considerations Related to Withdrawal of ECMO Support over the Objections of Capacitated Patients.
- Author
-
Childress, Andrew, Bibler, Trevor, Moore, Bryanna, Nelson, Ryan H., Robertson-Preidler, Joelle, Schuman, Olivia, and Malek, Janet
- Subjects
TERMINATION of treatment laws ,PROFESSIONAL ethics ,MEDICAL device removal ,RESPIRATORY insufficiency ,LIFE support systems in critical care ,ETHICS ,CAPACITY (Law) ,PATIENT decision making ,EXTRACORPOREAL membrane oxygenation ,SOCIAL justice ,PATIENTS' rights ,DECISION making ,QUALITY of life ,TERMINATION of treatment ,BIOETHICS - Abstract
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is typically viewed as a time-limited intervention—a bridge to recovery or transplant—not a destination therapy. However, some patients with decision-making capacity request continued ECMO support despite a poor prognosis for recovery and lack of viability as a transplant candidate. In response, critical care teams have asked for guidance regarding the ethical permissibility of unilateral withdrawal over the objections of a capacitated patient. In this article, we evaluate several ethical arguments that have been made in favor of withdrawal, including distributive justice, quality of life, patients' rights, professional integrity, and the Equivalence Thesis. We find that existing justifications for unilateral withdrawal of ECMO support in capacitated patients are problematic, which leads us to conclude that either: (1) additional ethical arguments are necessary to defend this approach or (2) the claim that it is not appropriate to use ECMO as a destination therapy should be questioned. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
45. A Question of Social Justice: How Policies of Profit Negate Engagement of Developing World Bioethicists and Undermine Global Bioethics.
- Author
-
Chattopadhyay, Subrata, Myser, Catherine, Moxham, Tiffany, and De Vries, Raymond
- Subjects
SERIAL publications ,BIOETHICS ,DEVELOPING countries ,ETHICS ,INTERNATIONAL relations ,SOCIAL justice ,ECONOMICS - Abstract
We identify the ways the policies of leading international bioethics journals limit the participation of researchers working in the resource-constrained settings of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in the development of the field of bioethics. Lack of access to essential scholarly resources makes it extremely difficult, if not impossible, for many LMIC bioethicists to learn from, meaningfully engage in, and further contribute to the global bioethics discourse. Underrepresentation of LMIC perspectives in leading journals sustains the hegemony of Western bioethics, limits the presentation of diverse moral visions of life, health, and medicine, and undermines aspirations to create a truly “global” bioethics. Limited attention to this problem indicates a lack of empathy and moral imagination on the part of bioethicists in high-income countries, raises questions about the ethics of bioethics, and highlights the urgent need to find ways to remedy this social injustice. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
46. Moral Distress: What Are We Measuring?
- Author
-
Kolbe, Laura and de Melo-Martin, Inmaculada
- Subjects
ETHICS ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL practice ,PSYCHOLOGICAL stress ,BIOETHICS ,PSYCHOLOGICAL distress ,EVALUATION - Abstract
While various definitions of moral distress have been proposed, some agreement exists that it results from illegitimate constraints in clinical practice affecting healthcare professionals' moral agency. If we are to reduce moral distress, instruments measuring it should provide relevant information about such illegitimate constraints. Unfortunately, existing instruments fail to do so. We discuss here several shortcomings of major instruments in use: their inability to determine whether reports of moral distress involve an accurate assessment of the requisite clinical and logistical facts in play, whether the distress in question is aptly characterized as moral, and whether the moral distress reported is an appropriate target of elimination. Such failures seriously limit the ability of empirical work on moral distress to foster appropriate change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
47. Electronic Fences Make Good Neighbors: The Importance of Medical Records Managers to Protecting Autonomy.
- Author
-
Fox, MarkD. and Munoz, RickyT.
- Subjects
HUMAN research subjects ,ELECTRONIC data interchange ,DECISION making ,MEDICAL records ,LEGAL status of patients ,ELECTRONIC health records ,ETHICS - Abstract
The article focuses on the role that institutional review boards and health information exchanges play in bioethical research and on the article "Does Consent Bias Research?" by Mark A. Rothstein and Abigail B. Shoben. In the article the authors offer their opinions on the role that medical records managers play in protecting the autonomy of research subjects and on several points which are raised in Rothstein and Shoben's article.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
48. Does Controlled Donation after Circulatory Death Violate the Dead Donor Rule?
- Author
-
Nielsen Busch, Emil J. and Mjaaland, Marius T.
- Subjects
BRAIN death ,DEBATE ,DEATH ,ORGAN donation ,TRANSPLANTATION of organs, tissues, etc. ,BIOETHICS - Abstract
The vital status of patients who are a part of controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) is widely debated in bioethical literature. Opponents to currently applied cDCD protocols argue that they violate the dead donor rule, while proponents of the protocols advocate compatibility. In this article, we argue that both parties often misinterpret the moral implications of the dead donor rule. The rule as such does not require an assessment of a donor's vital status, we contend, but rather an assessment of whether procurement of organs in cDCD cause the death of the donor or not. We then argue that commonly practiced cDCD protocols do not violate the dead donor rule, since the donation does not trigger or cause the death of the donors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
49. Behavior Contracts and Lessons from Parenting "Rotten" Kids.
- Author
-
McGreevy, Jolion and Rhodes, Rosamond
- Subjects
ETHICS ,CHILD behavior ,PARENTING ,BEHAVIOR disorders ,BEHAVIOR modification - Abstract
The article focuses on the study on ethical concerns regarding behavioral contracts, and mentions social and moral expectations on medical professional's control over their licensed activities. Topics discussed include doctor-patient relationship maintained by clinicians involving reciprocal duties, undermining ability of patient to be held responsible for their behavior, and behavior contracts advocated by clinicians and ethics consultants.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
50. Heroism Is Not a Plan—From "Duty to Treat" to "Risk and Rewards".
- Author
-
Kirsch, Thomas D.
- Subjects
PROFESSIONS ,ETHICS ,ATTITUDES of medical personnel ,MEDICAL personnel ,RISK assessment ,PSYCHOSOCIAL factors ,MEDICAL ethics ,LEGAL compliance ,BIOETHICS ,COVID-19 pandemic ,SOCIAL responsibility - Abstract
The author argues against heroism and explains health care workers' duty to treat despite their risk of illness and death during an epidemic. Several principles commonly used to justify a duty to treat are considered including consent/implied consent, special training, oaths and codes, and reciprocity/social contract. The author refers to reciprocity/fairness principle and transactional ethics as the answer as to why health care workers risk their lives to provide essential services to society.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.