Back to Search
Start Over
Marginally Represented Patients and the Moral Authority of Surrogates.
- Source :
- American Journal of Bioethics; Feb2020, Vol. 20 Issue 2, p44-48, 5p
- Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Incapacitated adult patients are commonly divided into two groups for purposes of decision making; those with a surrogate and those without. Respectively, these groups are often referred to as represented and unrepresented, and the relative ethics of decision making between them raises two particular issues. The first issue involves the differential application of the best interests standard between groups. Second is the prevailing notion that representedness and unrepresentedness are categorical phenomena, though it is more aptly understood as a multidimensional and continuous variable based on relational moral authority. This paper examines the nature of representedness as it relates to ethical norms of surrogate decision making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- AUTHORITY
BIOETHICS
ETHICS
ETHICAL decision making
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 15265161
- Volume :
- 20
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- American Journal of Bioethics
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 141601336
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2019.1701732