1. Evaluating Fitness in Older Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients: Balancing Therapy and Treatment Risks.
- Author
-
Molica, Matteo, Canichella, Martina, Jabbour, Elias, and Ferrara, Felicetto
- Subjects
ACUTE myeloid leukemia ,TERMINATION of treatment ,STEM cell transplantation ,DRUG labeling ,GERIATRIC assessment - Abstract
Assessing the suitability of older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) for intensive chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation remains a long-standing challenge. Geriatric assessment, which involves the evaluation of multiple dimensions of health, may influence a patient's ability to tolerate intensive or mild-intensity approaches, including treatment-related mortality. Prospective studies are required to validate different fitness criteria, in addition to making it possible to compare the effectiveness of geriatric assessment-based fitness against other criteria, in order to identify which aspects of geriatric assessment are linked to treatment tolerance. It is hoped that validation studies will include different groups of patients receiving either intensive or lower-intensity chemotherapy. At a minimum, geriatric assessment should involve the measurement of the comorbidity burden, cognition, physical function, and emotional health—factors previously associated with mortality in AML. These assessments should be conducted before starting chemotherapy in order to minimize the treatment's impact on the results. While treatment tolerance has traditionally been evaluated through toxicity rates in solid tumor patients, AML treatment often results in high toxicity rates regardless of the intensity. Therefore, early mortality should be the primary endpoint for assessing treatment tolerance, given its significant and clear implications. Other important endpoints might include declines in functional status and quality of life and treatment adjustments or discontinuation due to toxicity. Validating these fitness criteria is essential for guiding treatment choices, improving supportive care, determining trial eligibility, interpreting study outcomes, and informing drug labeling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF