Search

Copyright of Revista Digital de Derecho Administrativo is the property of Universidad Externado de Colombia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Chilena de Derecho is the property of Revista Chilena de Derecho and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Chilena de Derecho is the property of Revista Chilena de Derecho and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has issued a judgment regarding the interpretation of Directive 2003/4/EC on public access to environmental information. The case concerns a request for access to documents related to Ireland's greenhouse gas emissions, which was denied by the Irish government. The Irish High Court considered that the exception of "internal communications" was applicable but annulled the decision and returned the request to the Prime Minister for reconsideration. The Court of Justice establishes that the minutes could be covered by the exception of "internal communications" due to their internal and confidential nature. Furthermore, the Court has determined that the exception of res judicata in national legislation does not oppose the principles of equivalence and effectiveness. [Extracted from the article]

Copyright of Revista Foco (Interdisciplinary Studies Journal) is the property of Revista Foco and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article analyzes the difference between the principle of ne bis in ídem in procedural law and res judicata in criminal matters. It argues that, although both institutions have common points, it is necessary to differentiate them based on their foundation and structure. This distinction has procedural implications and reveals the value of the difference. The article also mentions the historical relationship between ne bis in ídem and res judicata, as well as their application in the Chilean criminal system. [Extracted from the article]

Copyright of Revista Técnica Tributaria is the property of Asociacion Espanola de Asesores Fiscales and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Since the reform of marriage nullity causes came into effect in 2015, the consensus has been that the peremptory nature of the time limits for introducing and pursuing an appeal applies only to pro nullitate judgments, not to pro vinculo judgments that may be subject to later appeal. From an exegetical, historical and dogmatic point of view, there are good reasons to hold that pro vinculo judgments also benefit from the peremptory nature of time limits for appeals. The peremptory status of such pro vinculo judgments is possible de iure condito, and both necessary and desirable de iure condendo. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The pandemic resulting from the onset of COVID-19 was largely a health emergency. However, it also had a direct legal, economic and social impact. In the legal sphere, one of its main effects was the resurgence of the doctrine of rebus sic stantibus as a mechanism for modifying contractual relationships. The present paper discusses whether the rebus clause can be invoked for judicial relationships that have already been debated, settled and subjected to a ruling. In other words, it analyses the clash between the rebus clause and the effectiveness of the res judicata of legal rulings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

More than eleven years after the judgement of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR) in the Gelman case, we proceed to study how this international ruling has influenced the national jurisprudence. Fluctuations can be observed in the jurisprudence until a kind of harmony is found between the national and the international jurisdiction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista de Administración Pública is the property of Centro de Estudios Politicos y Constitucionales and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista de Administración Pública is the property of Centro de Estudios Politicos y Constitucionales and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Jurídica (0103-3506) is the property of Revista Juridica and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This paper reflects on whether criminal law has in recent years cut a path "invading" several areas in the legal system, among which we find administrative law santioning, which has generated an overlap between subjects that has made administrative preliminary issues more relevance than ever before and brings out the pernicious effects of the current model of preliminary issues in the criminal proceedings in practice. This is the result of an in-depth historical, regulatory, doctrinal and case-legal line analysis around preliminary issues which, despite being one of the profiles of the prejudiciality with a greater theorical and practical significance, turns to be one of the least clarified parts in the whole procesal legal science. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A través de una sentencia judicial revestida con la calidad de cosa juzgada, se busca resolver un conflicto de intereses y, al cumplirse en sus propios términos, se hace efectivo el derecho a la tutela judicial efectiva; sin embargo, existen circunstancias materiales y jurídicas que pueden modificar el contexto en el cual se emitió la sentencia, lo que conlleva a declarar su inejecutabilidad. Tratar de ejecutar una sentencia que presenta una imposibilidad en su ejecución sería un acto arbitrario y opuesto a un criterio de razonabilidad vinculado a la justicia, esencia del Estado constitucional de derecho.

En este caso concreto, la Sala examina el recurso contencioso-administrativo formulado por GREENPACE ESPAÑA contra la desestimación presunta de la solicitud presentada con fecha 20 de noviembre de 2017 al ayuntamiento de Carboneras, en las que interesó los pedimentos que constituyen el objeto del presente recurso, y que detallamos a continuación. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Derecho del Estado is the property of Universidad Externado de Colombia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

El principio de seguridad jurídica tiene, como una de sus manifestaciones características, dentro del Estado de Derecho, la fuerza de cosa juzgada (res iudicata) que se atribuye a las sentencias o resoluciones judiciales equivalentes firmes, y que implica tanto su impugnabilidad como su potencial influencia en litigios posteriores que guarden una conexión con el asunto ya resuelto en firme. Sin embargo, es posible que estas decisiones judiciales firmes de jueces nacionales, por diversas causas (error, omisión, interpretación manifiestamente contraria, etc.) vulneren el Derecho de la Unión Europea y, por tanto, afecten tanto a su primacía como a su efectividad en sus relaciones con los ordenamientos jurídicos nacionales. El Tribunal de Justicia ha tenido oportunidad de enfrentarse al dilema de ponderar el principio de fuerza de cosa juzgada con las primacía y efectividad del Derecho de la Unión en diversas sentencias. Este trabajo tiene como objetivo realizar una aproximación y revisar la jurisprudencia más importante al respecto hasta la actualidad. Recibido: 09 noviembre 2020 Aceptado: 17 mayo 2021

Este artículo presenta la manera como la Corte Constitucional Colombiana (CCC) ha limitado el ámbito de aplicación de la cosa juzgada en los procesos de constitucionalidad. Los autores analizan la práctica de la Corte entre 1992 y 2019, y encuentra que la ccc ha relativizado el efecto de cosa juzgada en la mayoría de los casos, especialmente cuando el proceso fue iniciado por una acción, no de oficio por parte de la ccc. De acuerdo con el artículo 46 de la Ley 270 de 1996, la CCC tiene el deber de realizar una revisión de constitucionalidad completa: se debe analizar la norma demandada frente a toda la Constitución, incluyendo los cargos que no son presentados de manera explícita en la acción. En contra de esa ficción, la Corte estableció con su práctica una nueva regla, especialmente desde 2002: si el proceso inicia por una acción (lo que ocurre en el 86% de casos), la cosa juzgada es relativa a los cargos presentados por el accionante y, entonces, hay posibilidad de reabrir en el futuro el debate constitucional sobre la norma acusada. Para la Corte, la vieja excepción se ha vuelto un nuevo principio: entre 2015 y 2019, el 92,4% de las sentencias establecieron una cosa juzgada relativa.

El indulto es un auténtico –aunque muy frecuente— cuerpo extraño en un sistema democrático. Es una especie de válvula de seguridad que se activa cuando lo declarado por la Justicia puede provocar males mayores que los beneficios que la jurisdicción está llamada a producir. Con todo, ¿quién debe hacer esa ponderación? En el presente trabajo se examinan diversas razones que descartan que los tribunales puedan ser los depositarios de tal labor. Dado que también los gobiernos son inhábiles, finalmente se valora la alternativa de que sean los parlamentos como representantes de la voluntad popular los que ejerzan esa función.

Copyright of Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto is the property of Universidad de Deusto and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Dentro del ordenamiento jurídico ecuatoriano, se evidencia la extensión de facultades de los jueces penales, sobre la base del principio de reparación integral para otorgar indemnizaciones civiles a las víctimas de ilícitos penales. En este sentido, existen inconvenientes cuando estos daños, supuestamente resarcidos, carecen de efectividad, metodología o forma correcta de cuantificación. En este sentido, la víctima queda indefensa con una errónea restitución, y aparece el problema de la cosa juzgada en sentencias penales que no cumplen su finalidad resarcitoria. Por lo tanto, es menester de este trabajo, buscar una solución a la problemática planteada, toda vez que la víctima no tiene por que soportar daños que no los ha merecido, y mucho menos soportar indemnizaciones incorrectas. Para ello se analizará la institución de la cosa juzgada y la posibilidad de dejar sin efectos sus características de inmutabilidad y definitividad. Además del aporte con otras formas de excepciones frente a la misma problemática, como son la prejudicialidad y la litispendencia.

Copyright of Anuario de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de Alcalá is the property of Dykinson SL and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista de Derecho Privado (0123-4366) is the property of Universidad Externado de Colombia, Departmento de Derecho Civil and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

En este trabajo se abordan los aspectos históricos de la introducción de la extensión de efectos de sentencias firmes en el ordenamiento jurídico nacional y el impacto que esta figura ha tenido en el ámbito contencioso-administrativo desde una perspectiva procesal. Igualmente, se exponen sus fundamentos tanto sustantivos como formales, acercando esta herramienta (que es bastante desconocida) a los operadores jurídicos. Cuestiones como el derecho a la tutela judicial efectiva, la ejecución de sentencias o la extensión de la cosa juzgada son sometidas a revisión cuando entra en juego un instrumento de estas características. Pero, ¿realmente es tanta su eficacia como para justificar su difícil encaje en el ordenamiento? De ahí radica la importancia de conocer su historia y de establecer su fundamentación. Recibido: 23.07.2019 Aceptado: 16.12.2019 Publicación en línea: 31.12.2019

Copyright of Derecho Privado y Constitución is the property of Centro de Estudios Politicos y Constitucionales and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Justicia (0124-7441) is the property of Universidad Simon Bolivar and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Chilena de Derecho is the property of Revista Chilena de Derecho and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

En este trabajo se estudia la delimitación que realiza el Tribunal Constitucional en su jurisprudencia del derecho a la tutela judicial efectiva, en su vertiente de derecho a la ejecución. Se examina así el alcance constitucional del derecho de la ejecución de la sentencia en sus propios términos, y el de su precedente lógico, el derecho a la invariabilidad de las resoluciones judiciales firmes. Recibido: 30 octubre 2018 Aceptado: 21 noviembre 2018 Publicación en línea: 27 diciembre 2018

Copyright of Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo is the property of Centro de Estudios Politicos y Constitucionales and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Chilena de Derecho is the property of Revista Chilena de Derecho and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This work focus on the Jurisdictional Committee, body sets up by the Spanish Football Association with power to decide disputes in the field of football sports law. The configuration and faculties conferred to this body gives it a special singularity, not so much in the rules of its procedure as by the type of body that is and the consequence of its resolutions. This last matter appears with special legal attention when one of the parties, ever since the sports process is finished, brings a suit against the same party and with the same object of the action at the Court of Justice. The combination of these issues causes different legal problems, as a result of a wrong and confuses private regulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista del Instituto Colombiano de Derecho Procesal is the property of Instituto Colombiano de Derecho Procesal and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Debido al alto número de condenas en contra de las entidades públicas, el Congreso de Colombia, mediante el Acto Legislativo 03 de 2011, estableció que los efectos de las sentencias judiciales podrán ser modulados, modificados o diferidos siempre que afecten la sostenibilidad fiscal de la entidad condenada. El presente escrito analiza el sentido y alcance del incidente de impacto fiscal, así como sus implicaciones para el debido proceso, la cosa juzgada y la tutela judicial efectiva.

Una de las manifestaciones más controversiales del fenómeno de la constitucionalización del derecho es la constitucionalización de la cosa juzgada. La cosa juzgada constitucional ha desplazado a la cosa juzgada como elemento definitivo de una controversia, por medio de instrumentos como la tutela contra providencias judiciales; ha afectado el alcance de la competencia de control de constitucionalidad de tribunales como el Consejo de Estado; y ha ido introduciendo una institución más flexible, que admite excepciones en el control abstracto de constitucionalidad, como la de la Constitución viviente, y en el proceso de tutela, con la procedencia excepcional de la tutela contra la sentencia de tutela.

Copyright of Revista Opinião Jurídica is the property of Revista Opiniao Juridica and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista del Instituto Colombiano de Derecho Procesal is the property of Instituto Colombiano de Derecho Procesal and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)