Search

Background: Mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) are a group of lysosomal storage diseases with substantial unmet medical needs—for both patients and caregivers. Approved therapies are limited, and the perception of investigative ones remains enigmatic. Method: Using an innovative survey concept based on the discrete choice experiment method (DEC) with neuronopathic and non-neuronopathic patient scenarios, we aimed to evaluate how parents of children with MPS perceive different approved and innovative therapies. The questionnaire was distributed via patient organizations in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria. Results: Most likely parents would choose an approach to repurposed treatments for their child (neuronopathic: 82%, 14/17 and non-neuronopathic: 94%, 16/17), followed by enzyme replacement therapy (ERT, both 88%, 15/17), hematopoietic stem cell therapy (HSCT, 70%, 12/17 and 76%, 13/17), and finally gene therapy (GT, 58%, 10/17 and 53%, 9/17). The general attitudes strongly influenced decision-making regarding treatment options. While over 80% of respondents who held a positive attitude toward ERT, HSCT, and ITTs indicated they would opt for these therapies in both neuronopathic and non-neuronopathic cases, only about half of the parents with a favorable general view of gene therapy (GT) expressed a positive perception of its likelihood as a treatment option. Furthermore, most parents found mild infections, injection site reactions (ISRs), hypertonia, and treatment-related hospitalizations acceptable and indicated patient organizations as their main source of information. Conclusions: This study provides an innovative survey method, thereby offering the rationale for a quantitative risk–benefit model and the importance of patient and caregiver-centered information dissemination, especially for innovative therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) is a group of rare metabolic diseases associated with reduced life expectancy and a substantial unmet medical need. Immunomodulatory drugs could be a relevant treatment approach for MPS patients, although they are not licensed for this population. Therefore, we aim to provide evidence justifying fast access to innovative individual treatment trials (ITTs) with immunomodulators and a high-quality evaluation of drug effects by implementing a risk–benefit model for MPS. The iterative methodology of our developed decision analysis framework (DAF) consists of the following steps: (i) a comprehensive literature analysis on promising treatment targets and immunomodulators for MPS; (ii) a quantitative risk–benefit assessment (RBA) of selected molecules; and (iii) allocation phenotypic profiles and a quantitative assessment. These steps allow for the personalized use of the model and are in accordance with expert and patient representatives. The following four promising immunomodulators were identified: adalimumab, abatacept, anakinra, and cladribine. An improvement in mobility is most likely with adalimumab, while anakinra might be the treatment of choice for patients with neurocognitive involvement. Nevertheless, a RBA should always be completed on an individual basis. Our evidence-based DAF model for ITTs directly addresses the substantial unmet medical need in MPS and characterizes a first approach toward precision medicine with immunomodulatory drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) encompasses a group of genetic lysosomal storage disorders, linked to reduced life expectancy and a significant lack of effective treatment options. Immunomodulatory drugs could have the potential to be a relevant medical approach, as the accumulation of undegraded substances initiates an innate immune response, which leads to inflammation and clinical deterioration. However, immunomodulators are not licensed for this indication. Consequently, we aim to provide evidence advocating fast access to innovative individual treatment trials (ITTs) with immunomodulatory drugs and high-quality evaluation of drug effects by implementing a risk-benefit model tailored for MPS. The iterative methodology of our novel decision analysis framework (DAF) involves three key steps: (i) literature review on promising treatment targets and immunomodulators in MPS; (ii) quantitative risk-benefit assessment (RBA) of selected molecules; (iii) assigning phenotypic profiles and quantitative evaluations. The results facilitate a personalized application of the model and are based on published evidence as well as interdisciplinary experts' consensus and patient perspectives. Four promising immunomodulators have been identified: adalimumab, abatacept, anakinra, and cladribine. An improvement in mobility is most likely with adalimumab, while anakinra is anticipated as a treatment of choice for neuronopathic MPS patients. Nevertheless, a comprehensive RBA should always be completed on an individual basis. Our evidence-based DAF tool for ITTs directly addresses the substantial unmet medical need in MPS and characterizes an initial stride toward precision medicine with immunomodulators., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of SSIEM.)