This article investigates the material dimensions of international relations by analysing West German diplomacy after 1945. First, it focuses on the meaning of individual objects in communications and encounters between two states. Second, diplomatic practices are understood as attempts to create and shape specific atmospheres, as assemblages involving various objects, persons and practices. Diplomacy is thereby emphasised as a construct repeatedly connected to the material. Third, at the meta level, individual diplomatic objects and assemblages are embedded in an international system of materiality. It is argued that the material participates in the construction of international regimes of perception. Overall, the different material dimensions make it evident that objects are fundamentally involved in the history of relationships between states at the micro level (individual objects), at the meso level (assemblages) and at the meta level (patterns of systems). The end of a president's and a government's term in office initiates the making of a balance sheet. Actual achievements and deeds are checked against political promises, state representatives' articulated goals and expectations. The balance sheet may take shape prosaically in long speeches and newspaper articles; or it may find its way into the language of numbers with various kinds of statistics. In the case of foreign policy and diplomacy, it may also turn up as a balance of objects. Such was the case at the end of the term of Heinrich Lubke, West Germany's second federal president, who held office from September 1959 to June 1969. Der Spiegel, Hamburg's weekly news magazine, in its 2 June 1969, issue summed up the material legacies of Lubke's two terms.1 These were the objects that Lubke had received as gifts during his fourteen visits to thirty countries, along with the souvenirs that foreign guests had presented to him in the course of their numerous visits to the president's residence in Bonn. The range of gifts extended from "sandals, leather bags and textiles" to "lances, shields, sculptures and objets d'art", from valuable tapestries and vases to animals, including lions, cheetahs, monkeys and cranes, which had been directly transferred to zoos. The president of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Mobutu Sese Seko, actually honoured Lubke with an uncut diamond worth 100,000 German marks (DM). At the end of Lubke's term, many of these gifts were passed on to museums or government institutions or else were transformed into charitable donations to residents of retirement homes and orphanages. Such presents brought by guests highlight a specific material dimension of state representation and diplomacy: They emphasise how important individual objects may be in communications and encounters between two states. These gifts point to the principle of reciprocity, which is both characteristic for diplomatic relationships between states and generally marks the relationship between a guest and a host. But as this chapter will elaborate in its first section, there are additional reasons for why single objects are important to diplomacy. That is, although these individual items may be of great diplomatic importance, they still represent only one of several material dimensions of diplomacy. Indeed, the variety of the gifts that Lubke amassed indicates that seldom did a thing have only one unique meaning. Rather, diplomacy is characterised precisely by the methodical interplay of several things and people in the framework of so called 'assemblages'. As the second section of this chapter shall reveal, it is the skilful combination and spatial arrangement of objects that create diverse atmospheres and thereby determine the setting in which diplomatic actions are performed. The criteria according to which these settings are produced are due to more than just general guidelines and situative decisions concerning staging and representation: for instance, they may confer a particularly splendid aura on a certain situation or, conversely, create a more intimate setting. In fact, as argued in the third section of this chapter, these things and assemblages reflect how the international state system has always also been a material system. Merely by taking into account Lubke's extensive collection of gifts, we become aware of how the material dimensions of diplomacy might pose great challenges to governments, as summed up in the final section of this chapter. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]