Search

The steering committee of VKM has self-initiated a mandate for an opinion on microplastics based on recently published international and/or national reports complemented with literature from December 2016 to February 2019. The mandate requested a summary of the state of knowledge on the presence of microplastics in the environment and the implications for the ecosystem, terrestrial and aquatic organisms, food production and human health. An overview of main national and international ongoing initiatives was also requested, and highlighting of data gaps where specific Norwegian data was needed. VKM appointed a working group consisting of two VKM members and eight external experts (two are former VKM-members), in addition to a project leader from the VKM secretariat to write the assessment.

Source at https://vkm.no/download/18.2251cf2016368db15f982b15/1527073920923/Oppsummering%20fra%20VKMs%20vitenskapelige%20uttalelser%202016-2017%20Kunnskapsbehov%20av%20betydning%20for%20mattrygghet%20og%20besky. Målet med denne rapporten er å synliggjøre kunnskapsbehov som er viktige for å sikre trygg mat og beskyttelse av miljøet i årene som kommer, og forbedre den nasjonale kunnskapsbasen. Rapporten er den siste i en serie av rapporter om kunnskapsbehov publisert av Vitenskapskomiteen for mat og miljø (VKM, tidligere Vitenskapskomiteen for mattrygghet). Den løfter frem kunnskapsbehov som er identifisert i VKMs vitenskapelige uttalelser i perioden 2016 til 2017

Source at https://vkm.no/ The goal of this report is to highlight research needs and data gaps that are of future importance for food safety and protection of the environment and thereby improve the national knowledge-base. This report is the latest in a series of reports on research needs and data gaps published periodically by the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (VKM), former Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (VKM), and thus seeks to highlight research needs and data gaps identified in and related to VKMs scientific opinions for 2016 and 2017 only. Målet med denne rapporten er å synliggjøre kunnskapsbehov som er viktige for å sikre trygg mat og beskyttelse av miljøet i årene som kommer, og forbedre den nasjonale kunnskapsbasen. Rapporten er den siste i en serie av rapporter om kunnskapsbehov publisert av Vitenskapskomiteen for mat og miljø (VKM, tidligere Vitenskapskomiteen for mattrygghet). Den løfter frem kunnskapsbehov som er identifisert i VKMs vitenskapelige uttalelser i perioden 2016 til 2017.

Source at https://vkm.no/ Summary report from VKM’s scientific opinions for 2016 - 2017The goal of this report is to highlight research needs and data gaps that are of future importance for food safety and protection of the environment and thereby improve the national knowledge base. This report is the latest in a series of reports on research needs and data gaps published periodically by the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (VKM), former Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (VKM), and thus seeks to highlight research needs and data gaps identified in and related to VKMs scientific opinions for 2016 and 2017 only.

Since 1986, the management of radioactive contamination in food and feed in Norway has been driven mainly by the Chernobyl Disaster follow-up. Monitoring and countermeasures are still in place to reduce the exposure to the population. The Norwegian Food Safety Authority is in the process of revising the maximum levels (MLs) for radioactive substances in drinking water and food and establishing new ones where necessary (including for feed). These MLs are to be applicable in the management of the normal situation, immediately subsequent to any accidents, and possibly in the long-term follow-up period after accidents. As part of this process, the Norwegian Food Safety Authority requested the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety to assess the risk that radioactivity in food and feed poses to human health. More specifically, VKM was requested to address the following questions in the Terms of Reference (ToR): ToR1: What is the current health risk from radioactivity in food –food gathering and hunting included – to the whole population and specific groups in Norway? ToR2: What health risk would the current levels of caesium-137 measured in live reindeer and sheep pose to the whole population and specific groups, if no efforts were made to reduce them? ToR3: What would be the implication to the health risk if the ML for reindeer meat was reduced from 3000 to 1500 or 600 Bq/kg, respectively – for the whole population and for specific groups? ToR4: Would the procedure and the maximum levels laid down in the Euratom Treaty regulation on radioactive contamination of foodstuffs and feedstuffs following a nuclear accident be appropriate for managing similar scenarios in Norway?

Related version: VKM Report 2016: 48 : https://vkm.no/download/18.7e19596115dabec04172717/1501849448865/30664700ba.pdf Målet med denne rapporten er å synliggjøre kunnskapsbehov som er viktige for å sikre trygg mat og opprettholdelse avbiologisk mangfold i årene som kommer.Vitenskapskomiteen for mattrygghet (VKM) utarbeider og kommunisereruavhengige, vitenskapelige uttalelser, blant annet risikovurderinger og nytte-risikovurderinger. Hovedmålet til VKM er å sikre trygg mat og opprettholdelse av biologisk mangfold.

Source at https://vkm.no/ The aim of the present report is to highlight research needs and data gaps that are of future importance for food safety and protection of biodiversity. The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (VKM) produces and communicates scientific opinions, i.e. risk-and risk-benefitassessments, with the main goal of securing food safety and protection of biodiversity.Food safety is one of the prerequisites for good health, and is on the agenda both nationally and internationally. Since food production, food products on the market and dietary habits as well as the presence of potentialhazardsare constantly changing, there is a continuous need for new knowledge to ensure safe food Målet med denne rapporten er å synliggjøre kunnskapsbehov som er viktige for å sikre trygg mat og opprettholdelse avbiologisk mangfold i årene som kommer.Vitenskapskomiteen for mattrygghet (VKM) utarbeider og kommunisereruavhengige, vitenskapelige uttalelser, blant annet risikovurderinger og nytte-risikovurderinger. Hovedmålet til VKM er å sikre trygg mat og opprettholdelse av biologisk mangfold.Trygg mat er en av forutsetningene for god helseog vies mye oppmerksomhetbåde nasjonalt og internasjonalt. Stadige endringer i hvordan maten produseres, hvilke matvarer som er tilgjengelige, hva befolkningen spiser og hvilke potensielle farer som følger med maten skaper et kontinuerlig behov for ny kunnskap for å sikre at maten er trygg.

Related version: VKM Report 2016: 48 : https://vkm.no/download/18.7e19596115dabec04172717/1501849448865/30664700ba.pdf The aim of the present report is to highlight research needs and data gaps that are of future importance for food safety and protection of biodiversity. The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (VKM) produces and communicates scientific opinions, i.e. risk-and risk-benefitassessments, with the main goal of securing food safety and protection of biodiversity.

Source at https://vkm.no/ I denne rapporten oppsummerer VKM behov for forskning, kostholdsdata, kartlegging og overvåkning av norske forhold som vi mener er nødvendig for kunne gi solide og gode risikovurderinger som skal ivareta norske forbrukere og som har betydning for norsk matindustri og mateksport.

Organic plant production in 2012 covered 50 200 ha which is 5.1% of the total agricultural area of Norway. The country is on the northern frontier for commercial plant production with short growing season, low summer temperature, and in some districts precipitation above the optimum for crops. However, many hours of daylight during the summer months are positive for plant production. Very few Norwegian studies have compared organic and conventional plant production. Therefore, the evaluations of nutrient contents, plant health and environmental contaminants are mainly based on scientific publications from other countries of Europe and North America. The main sources of uncertainty in the evaluation are differences in climate, soil types and varieties cultivated in Norway and in the countries were comparative studies of organic and conventional agriculture have been performed.

The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety performed the present assessment of the differences between organic and conventional foods and food production on plant health, animal health and welfare and human health at the request of the Norwegian Food Safety Authority. The work was divided into five parts: (I) Plant health and plant production, (II) Animal health and welfare, (III) Human health - nutrition and contaminants, (IV) Human health – hygiene and pathogens and (V) Human health - pesticide residues.

The two salts NaCl and KCl appear to function similarly in controlling growth of microorganisms in foods. However, present information is limited. As KCl, in the present context, may fully or partially replace NaCl at the same molarity, there should be no need to evaluate the consequences of different replacement scenarios further as the food safety most likely would not be altered. The microbiological part of this risk assessment only concerns possible effects of partial or full replacement of NaCl with KCl on the survival, growth or toxin production by food-borne bacteria. NaCl has an impact during processing of food. The preservative functionality of KCl has been shown to be equivalent to that of NaCl when calculated on molar basis (Bidlas&Lambert 2008) thus not increasing risk for survival, growth or toxin production by food-borne bacteria.. Irrespective of food group, NaCl can be fully or partially replaced by KCl at the same molarity, without altering microbiological food safety

Report from the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (VKM) 2014:15. Benefit-risk assessment of fish and fish products in the Norwegian diet – an update. Source at https://www.vkm.no/. In September 2013, the Norwegian Food Safety Authority requested VKM to update relevant parts of the benefit-risk assessment of fish in the Norwegian diet published by VKM in 2006. The background for the request was new knowledge and data on the content of some nutrients and contaminants both for wild and farmed fish since 2006. The proportion of vegetable ingredients used in farmed fish feed has in recent years increased, and new national dietary surveys for adults and children have been conducted. The Norwegian Food Safety Authority referred to VKM’s report from 2006, which pointed out that the positive impact of fish consumption on public health was especially due to the content of polyunsaturated fatty acids and vitamin D in fish. Further, VKM concluded that the contaminants that could pose a potential risk to public health through fish consumption mainly were methylmercury, dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (dl-PCBs). The request included a reassessment of fish consumption in Norway with focus on specific nutrients; n-3 fatty acids (eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosapentaenoic acid (DPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)), vitamin D, and the minerals iodine and selenium, and on specific contaminants; mercury, dioxins and dl-PCBs. VKM was asked to address the main changes in the use of raw materials in farmed fish feed and how these affect the levels of nutrients, mercury, dioxins and dl-PCBs and in fish feed. Further, VKM was asked to address to what extent levels of nutrients and contaminants in fish have changed since 2006, to describe these changes and estimate the human intake of the substances in question on the basis of recent dietary data. VKM was also requested to consider the benefits of eating fish with regard to the intake of nutrients and the risks associated with the intake of mercury, dioxins and dl-PCBs and comment on whether this change the conclusions from the report in 2006. Additionally, on the basis of updated knowledge, VKM was asked to comment whether other substances, like pesticide and residues of veterinary medicinal products, could affect the conclusions with regard to the impact on public health. The Norwegian Food Safety Authority and the Directorate of Health will use the updated assessment as a basis for public recommendations concerning the consumption of fish and fish products.

Source at https://vkm.no/english/riskassessments/allpublications/benefitandriskassessmentofbreastmilkforinfanthealthinnorway.4.27ef9ca915e07938c3b2a6df.html. Breastmilk covers all the nutritional needs of the infant the first months of life, with the exception of vitamin D. In addition, breastmilk has a number of protective properties. However, as humans are exposed to polluting chemicals through food, air, water and skin contact, breastmilk also contains contaminants. Taking the present-day levels of contaminants in Norwegian breastmilk and the long duration of breastfeeding (12 months) in Norway into account, the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety concludes that contaminants poses a low risk to Norwegian infants, and that the benefits of breastmilk to Norwegian infants clearly outweigh the risk presented by contaminants.

The theoretical principles for the various types of combined toxic effects of multiple chemical exposures and the description of models for handling cases where such effects are likely to occur are still applicable as described in the VKM report from 2008. The conclusions presented in this report are still valid, but for some points precisions have been made.

The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (Vitenskapskomiteen for mattrygghet, VKM) has on request of the Norwegian Food Safety Authority performed a risk assessment of aluminium exposure though food and the use of cosmetic products in the Norwegian population. The assessment was performed by the VKM Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids, Materials in Contact with Food and Cosmetics, and the VKM Panel on Contaminants.

Vitenskapskomiteen for mattrygghet (VKM) skal levere vitenskapelige risikovurderinger innenfor Mattilsynets forvaltningsområde samt miljørisikovurderinger av genmodifiserte organismer til Direktoratet for naturforvaltning. Risikovurderinger er ikke forskning i seg selv, men baserer seg på forskningsresultater. VKM er avhengig av at det finnes forskning på de områdene som skal vurderes. Under arbeidet med risikovurderingene avdekkes stadig viktige kunnskapshull. Det er derfor helt nødvendig for VKMs arbeid at det forskes innen området mattrygghet. Videre er VKM helt avhengig av å ha eksperter med god kompetanse og det er derfor viktig at de forskjellige forskningsmiljøenes kompetanse innenfor Mattilsynets forvaltningsområde opprettholdes og i noen tilfeller styrkes. Det faglige ansvarsområdet til VKM er omfattende og VKM er delt inn i ni faggrupper som har ansvar for sine fagområder. VKMs Hovedkomité har prioritert to viktige områder som VKM trenger mer kunnskap om for å kunne produsere risikovurderinger med høy kvalitet. I tillegg til disse to prioriterte områdene, synliggjøres også andre viktige forskningsbehov som faggruppene i VKM har påpekt. Helt til slutt vises en tabell med detaljerte og spesifikke kunnskapshull som er påpekt i VKMs risikovurderinger i 2011.

The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (Vitenskapskomiteen for mattrygghet, VKM) has on request of The Norwegian Food Safety Authority performed a risk assessment of furan intake in the Norwegian population based on the most recent national food consumption surveys. National occurrence data of furan concentrations in food were preferentially used in the risk assessment. When national data were lacking, VKM has used occurrence data of furan from other countries. The assessment has been performed by the VKM Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids, Materials in Contact with Food and Cosmetics and the VKM Panel on Contaminants.

Sjøbunnen i ulike områder langs norskekysten kan være forurenset med polysykliske aromatiske hydrokarboner (PAH) (”tjærestoffer”) på grunn av pågående eller tidligere industriell aktivitet, eller annen påvirkning. Flere PAH-forbindelser er kreftfremkallende og gentoksiske (mutagene). Skjell er organismer som lever på bunnen, filtrerer sjøvann og kan akkumulere forurensninger. Mattilsynet har kostholdsråd for skjell i havner og fjorder der det er funnet at skjellene er forurenset med PAH. Grunnlaget for kostholdsrådene er risikovurderinger utført av Vitenskapskomiteen for mattrygghet (VKM). Benzo[a]pyren (BaP) er en av de best undersøkte og mest potente kreftfremkallende PAHforbindelsene. BaP var inntil nylig regnet som en god indikator for alle kreftfremkallende PAH som kan forekomme i ulike næringsmidler. Mattilsynet har gitt kostholdsråd for konsum av skjell i områder med 5 nanogram BaP/g skjellmat (ng/g) eller mer. I EU har grenseverdien for omsetning av skjell til konsum vært 10 ng BaP/g skjellmat. Det europeiske mattrygghetsorganet (EFSA) konkluderte i 2008 med at summen av fire PAH-forbindelser (PAH4; benz[a]antracen, benzo[a]pyren, benzo[b]fluoranten og krysen) gir et bedre uttrykk for kreftfremkallende PAH-forbindelser enn BaP alene. Våren 2011 er foreslått grenseverdi i EU 30 ng PAH4/g skjellmat. I tillegg er grenseverdien for BaP foreslått satt ned fra 10 til 5 ng/g skjellmat. VKM har tidligere utført risikovurderinger av PAH i skjell basert på indikatoren BaP. VKM ønsket derfor å undersøke om PAH4 også er et egnet mål for kreftfremkallende PAHforbindelser i norske skjell. Gjennomgang av analysedata for blåskjell høstet fra ulike steder langs norskekysten viser at den foreslåtte grenseverdien for PAH4 (30 ng/g skjellmat) gir noe mer beskyttelse for befolkningen enn den nasjonale tiltaksgrensen for kostholdsråd (5 ng BaP/g skjellmat) som er sammenfallende med EUs foreslåtte grenseverdi for BaP (5 ng BaP/g skjellmat), og klart mer beskyttende enn EUs gjeldende grenseverdi for BaP (10 ng BaP/g skjellmat). Vurdering av de tilgjengelige analyseresultater i blåskjell tyder ikke på at eksisterende kostholdsråd for skjellkonsum langs norskekysten trenger å endres som følge av EUs foreslåtte grenseverdi for PAH4 i skjell på 30 ng/g.

I denne rapporten oppsummerer VKM kunnskapshull og forskningsbehov som komiteen har avdekket i sitt arbeid med risikovurderingene i perioden 2009-2010.

Vitenskapskomiteen for mattrygghet

The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (VKM) has been asked by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority to perform a health risk assessment on decomposition substances and oxidation products in fish oils intended for human consumption except pharmaceuticals. Seal and/or krill oil intended for human consumption might be included but in separate chapters. EU’s hygiene regulations for the production of fish oils intended for human consumption were strengthened from 2008 in the EU (from March 2010 in Norway), but concerns regarding the possible presence of decomposition substances and oxidation products in the oils and their possible consequences on human health were raised. In the request from the National Food Safety Authority, VKM was asked to include descriptions of the substances resulting from decomposition of the various raw material used for fish oil production, and the products formed during oxidation of marine oils. Additionally, a description of the substances formed and/or eliminated during the various processing steps in the production of marine oils intended for human consumption and to take raw material, processing conditions, storing and transporting conditions of raw material and fish oil into account. Depending on the detectability of the identified substances/products of concern in n-3 fatty acid food supplements, a qualitative, and if possible quantitative, health risk assessment should be performed. The main focus is on production of fish oil and on fish oil used as food supplement (i.e. in bottle or encapsulated). Other marine sources for oil production such as krill and seal blubber, as well as emulsions and microencapsulation of marine n-3 fatty acids used for fortification of regular food, are not evaluated in detail. Food supplements based on oil derived from the crustaceans Calanus finmarchicus, which is a growing business in Norway, has not been included. It was beyond the scope of this evaluation to address environmental contaminants in marine raw materials/oils and in final products. © Vitenskapskomiteen for mattrygghet

Det er fastsatt øvre grenseverdier for dioksiner og dioksinliknende (dl) PCB i næringsmidler inkludert hvitt krabbekjøtt, men ikke i brun krabbemat. I tilknytning til sterkt forurensede områder langs kysten har Mattilsynet derfor gitt spesielle kostholdsråd til lokalbefolkningen for inntak av fisk og skalldyr de selv fanger. Det er også gitt generelle råd til kvinner i fruktbar alder og barn, gravide, samt ammende om ikke å spise brun krabbemat på grunn av mulig høyt innhold av miljøgiftene dioksiner og dl-PCB. Hvit krabbemat (i klør, ben og krabbehus) har svært lavt fettinnhold og inneholder lite dioksiner og PCB. VKMs faggruppe for forurensninger, naturlige toksiner og medisinrester (Faggruppe 5) har på forespørsel fra Mattilsynet laget scenariofremstillinger som illustrerer hvor mange krabber som voksne kan konsumere per år uten å overskride det tolerable inntaksnivået for dioksiner og PCB, basert på antatte nivåer av disse stoffene i krabbe. Fremstillingene viser at antall krabber som kan spises per år uten at tolerabelt inntak overskrides er svært variabelt, fra nær sagt ubegrenset hvis krabbene inneholder lav konsentrasjon av slike stoffer, til i underkant av en krabbe per år hvis den er fanget i områder med høy dioksinforurensning. Det understrekes at scenarioberegningene er grove anslag og gjelder for voksne. Ved vurdering i konkrete tilfeller bør det også tas i betraktning at bakgrunnsinntaket av dioksiner og PCB fra kosten er variabelt, og kan for noen befolkningsgrupper være høyere enn gjennomsnittet som ligger til grunn for beregningene.