Search

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare outcomes for AngioJet thrombectomy versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) without thrombectomy in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients. BACKGROUND: PCI is the preferred treatment for revascularizing the infarct-related artery in patients with AMI. There is controversy about the benefits of thrombectomy as an adjunct to PCI. METHODS: AMI studies published between January 1, 1999, and March 1, 2007, were used to compare AngioJet thrombectomy plus PCI to PCI alone. Bayesian meta-analytic estimates were used to estimate the odds ratios (95% CI) for short-term mortality, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and final TIMI 3 flow. RESULTS: The AngioJet data included 11 studies and 1,018 patients. The PCI data included 81 studies and 24,076 patients. The AngioJet group included more patients with large thrombus burden, rescue PCI after failed thrombolytic therapy, and longer symptom duration compared to the PCI group. Despite the higher risk profile of AngioJet patients, the groups had similar odds of short-term mortality, 0.98 (0.53, 1.50), MACE, 1.25 (0.54, 2.40), and final TIMI 3 flow, 1.12 (0.70, 2.27). CONCLUSION: AngioJet thrombectomy results in clinical and angiographic outcomes that are similar to PCI in lower risk AMI patients. These observations suggest that AngioJet thrombectomy may reduce the additional risk associated with visible thrombus in the infarct-related lesion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We evaluated the incidence, angiographic predictors, and clinical outcome of side branch occlusion (SBO) following high-pressure intracoronary stenting in 175 patients. All stent implants during a 7-month period were reviewed for the incidence of major (>1 mm) SBO. Side branches were further characterized based on side branch and index lesion morphology. Clinical events (death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization rates) were determined at 9 months. A total of 175 patients (182 lesions) had 224 major side branches covered by intracoronary stents. Of these, 43 (19%) occluded. Most SBOs (29 of 43 [67%]) occurred after poststent dilation using high-pressure inflations (15.3 +/- 3.3 atmospheres). No clinical characteristics correlated with SBO. By multivariate analysis, those side branches with >50% ostial narrowing that arose from within or just beyond the diseased portion of the parent vessel (threatened side branch morphologies) were a powerful angiographic predictor of SBO (odds ratio 40, 95% confidence interval, 14 to 130, p <0.0001). At 9-month follow-up there was no difference in combined clinical events between those patients with and without SBO. These data demonstrate that side branches with ostial stenoses in continuity with diseased parent lesions were at risk of occlusion following stenting. SBO, however, was not associated with adverse clinical outcome. These findings lend support to plaque shift ("snow plow effect") as the mechanism behind SBO following stent placement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dedicated coronary artery drug-eluting stents may be inadequate in coronary arteries >6 mm in diameter, due to the risk of stent undersizing if the stent is not fully expanded or to loss of radial strength or damage to the drug coating if the stent is expanded >6 mm. We present two patients with large coronary arteries who were successfully treated with biliary balloon expandable stents., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Computed tomography (CTA)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR CT ) guides the need for invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Late outcomes after FFR CT are reported in stable ischemic heart disease but not in acute chest pain in the emergency department (ACP-ED). The objectives are to assess the risk of death, myocardial infarction (MI), revascularization, and ICA after FFR CT . From 2015 to 2018, 389 low-risk patients with ACP-ED (negative biomarkers, no electrocardiographic ischemia) underwent CTA and FFR CT and were entered into a prospective institutional registry; patients were followed up for 41 ± 10 months. CTA stenosis ≥50% was present in 81% of the patients. Positive (FFR CT ≤0.80) and negative FFR CT were observed in 124 (32%) and 265 patients (68%), respectively. ICA was performed in 108 of 124 patients (87%) with positive FFR CT and 89 of 265 patients (34%) with negative FFR CT (p <0.00001). Revascularization was performed in 87 of 124 (70%) patients with positive FFR CT and in 22 of 265 (8%) with negative FFR CT (p <0.00001). Appropriateness of revascularization was established by blinded adjudication of ICA and invasive FFR using practice guidelines; revascularization was appropriate in 81 of 124 (65%) and 6 of 265 (2%) of FFR CT -positive and -negative patients, respectively (p <0.00001). At follow-up, for patients with positive versus negative FFR CT , the rates were 0.8% versus 0% for death (p = 0.32) and 1.6% versus 0.4% for MI (p = 0.24). In conclusion, in low-risk patients with ACP-ED who underwent CTA and FFR CT , the risk of late death (0.2%) and MI (0.7%) are low. Negative FFR CT is associated with excellent long-term prognosis, and positive FFR CT predicts obstructive disease requiring revascularization. FFR CT can safely triage patients with ACP-ED and reduce unnecessary ICA and revascularization., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Fonte is an employee of HeartFlow, Inc. and owns equity or stocks. The remaining authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose To assess the diagnostic performance of a coronary CT angiography (CCTA) artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled tool (AI-QCPA; HeartFlow) to quantify plaque volume, as compared with intravascular US (IVUS). Materials and Methods A retrospective subanalysis of a single-center prospective registry study was conducted in participants with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention of the culprit vessel. Participants with greater than 50% stenosis in nonculprit vessels underwent CCTA, invasive coronary angiography, and IVUS of nonculprit lesion(s) between 2 and 40 days after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Comparisons of plaque volumes obtained using AI-QCPA (HeartFlow) and IVUS were assessed using Spearman rank correlation (ρ) and Bland-Altman analysis. Results Thirty-three participants (mean age, 59.1 years ± 8.8 [SD]; 27 [82%] male and six [18%] female participants) and 67 vessels were included for analysis. There was strong agreement between AI-QCPA and IVUS in vessel (ρ = 0.94) and lumen volumes (ρ = 0.97). High agreement between AI-QCPA and IVUS was also found for total plaque volume (ρ = 0.92), noncalcified plaque (ρ = 0.91), and calcified plaque (ρ = 0.87). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated AI-QCPA underestimated total plaque volume (-9.4 mm 3 ) and calcified plaque (-11.4 mm 3 ) and overestimated for noncalcified plaque (2.0 mm 3 ) when compared with IVUS. Conclusion An AI-enabled automated plaque quantification tool for CCTA had high agreement with IVUS for quantifying plaque volume and characterizing plaque. Keywords: Coronary Plaque, Intravascular US, Coronary CT Angiography, Artificial Intelligence Supplemental material is available for this article. ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT02926755 © RSNA, 2024.

Hyperemic and nonhyperemic pressure ratios are frequently used to assess the hemodynamic significance of coronary artery disease and to guide the need for myocardial revascularization. However, there are limited data on the diagnostic performance of the diastolic hyperemia-free ratio (DFR). We evaluated the diagnostic performance of the DFR compared with invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR). We performed a prospective, single-center study of 308 patients (343 lesions) who underwent DFR and FFR for evaluation of visually estimated 40% to 90% stenoses. Diagnostic performance of the DFR compared with FFR was evaluated using linear regression, Bland-Altman analysis, and receiver operating characteristic curves. The overall diagnostic accuracy of the DFR was 83%; the accuracy rates were 86%, 40%, and 95% when the DFR was <0.86, 0.88 to 0.90, and >0.93, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predicative value, and negative predictive value were 60%, 91%, 71%, and 87%, respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.75 (p <0.05). The Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference of 0.09, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.88 (95% confidence interval 0.84 to 0.92, p <0.05). In conclusion, the DFR has a good diagnostic performance compared with FFR but 17% of the measurements were discordant. The diagnostic accuracy of the DFR was only 40% when the DFR was 0.88 to 0.90, suggesting that FFR may be useful in these arteries., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no competing interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and CCTA-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) are the best non-invasive techniques to assess coronary artery disease (CAD) and myocardial ischemia. Advances in these technologies allow a paradigm shift to the use of CCTA and FFRCT for advanced plaque characterization and planning myocardial revascularization., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and CCTA-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) are the best non-invasive techniques to assess coronary artery disease (CAD) and myocardial ischemia. Advances in these technologies allow a paradigm shift to the use of CCTA and FFRCT for advanced plaque characterization and planning myocardial revascularization., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Renal artery stenosis is the most common secondary cause of hypertension and predominantly caused by atherosclerosis. In suspected patients, a non-invasive diagnosis with ultrasound is preferred. Asymptomatic, incidentally found RAS does not require revascularization. In symptomatic patients requiring revascularization, renal artery stenting is the preferred therapy. Selecting appropriate patients for revascularization requires careful consideration of lesion severity and is optimized with a multidisciplinary team. All patients with atherosclerotic RAS should be treated with guideline-directed medical therapy, including hypertension control, diabetes control, statins, antiplatelet therapy, smoking cessation and encouraging activity., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None, (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Values of fractional flow reserve (FFR CT ) by coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) decline from the ostium to the terminal vessel, irrespective of stenosis severity. The purpose of this study is to determine if the site of measurement of FFR CT impacts assessment of ischemia and its diagnostic performance relative to invasive FFR (FFR INV )., Methods: 1484 patients underwent FFR CT ; 1910 vessels were stratified by stenosis severity (normal; <25%, 25-50%, 50-70%, and >70% stenosis). The rates of positive FFR CT (≤0.8) were determined by measuring FFR CT from the terminal vessel and from distal-to-the-lesion. Reclassification rates from positive to negative FFR CT were calculated. Diagnostic performance of FFR CT relative to FFR INV was evaluated in 182 vessels using linear regression, Bland Altman analysis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves., Results: Positive FFR CT was identified in 24.9% of vessels using terminal vessel FFR CT and 10.1% using FFR CT distal-to-the-lesion (p ​< ​0.001). FFR CT obtained distal-to-the-lesion resulted in reclassification of 59.6% of positive terminal FFR CT to negative FFR CT . Relative to FFR INV , there were improvements in specificity (50% to 86%, p ​< ​0.001), diagnostic accuracy (65% to 88%, p ​< ​0.001), positive predictive value (50% to 78%, p ​< ​0.001), and area-under-the-curve (AUC, 0.83 to 0.91, p ​< ​0.001) when FFR CT was measured distal-to-the-lesion., Conclusion: FFR CT values from the terminal vessel should not be used to assess lesion-specific ischemia due to high rates of false positive results. FFR CT measured distal-to-the-lesion improves the diagnostic performance of FFR CT relative to FFR INV , ensures that FFR CT values are due to lesion-specific ischemia, and could reduce the rate of unnecessary invasive procedures., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Drs. Cami, Chinnaiyan, and Safian receive research grant support from HeartFlow Inc. Drs. Chinnaiyan and Safian are members of the Medical Advisory Board for HeartFlow, Inc but do not receive any compensation except for reimbursement for travel expenses., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Coronavirus disease 2019 is a global pandemic affecting >3 million people in >170 countries, resulting in >200 000 deaths; 35% to 40% of patients and deaths are in the United States. The coronavirus disease 2019 crisis is placing an enormous burden on health care in the United States, including residency and fellowship training programs. The balance between mitigation, training and education, and patient care is the ultimate determinant of the role of cardiology fellows in training during the coronavirus disease 2019 crisis. On March 24, 2020, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education issued a formal response to the pandemic crisis and described a framework for operation of graduate medical education programs. Guidance for deployment of cardiology fellows in training during the coronavirus disease 2019 crisis is based on the principles of a medical mission, and adherence to preparation, protection, and support of our fellows in training. The purpose of this review is to describe our departmental strategic deployment of cardiology fellows in training using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education framework for pandemic preparedness.

Background/purpose: General Anesthesia (GA) and conscious sedation (CS) are anesthetics for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TF-TAVR). We compared TF-TAVR outcomes using a novel anesthetic approach with fascia iliaca block (FIB) plus minimal CS (MCS) versus GA., Methods: This retrospective propensity-matched study included consecutive TF-TAVR patients from January 2013 to December 2017 and dichotomized into FIB-MCS vs. GA. Data were collected from electronic records, Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) database, and the Transcatheter Valve Therapies (TVT) Registry. Primary endpoints were operating room (OR) time, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS). Secondary endpoints were 30-day, 1-year mortality, quality of life, 30-day re-hospitalization rate, failure of FIB-MCS, and hospital safety outcomes., Results: A total of 304 TF-TAVR patients; FIB-MCS (n = 219) vs. GA (n = 85). Propensity matched 162 patients; FIB-MCS (n = 108) vs. GA (n = 54). FIB-MCS had shorter OR time (197.6 ± 56.3 vs. 248.2 ± 46.3 min, p < 0.001), ICU (67.8 ± 71.7 vs. 84.9 ± 72.1 h, p = 0.004) and hospital LOS (3.2 ± 3.7 vs. 5.9 ± 3.5 d, p < 0.001). FIB-MCS had lower rate of blood transfusion. FIB-MCA vs. GA 30-day and 1-year mortality were similar in the entire (2.3 vs. 2.4%, p = 1.0; and 8.2 vs. 5.9%, p = 0.49) and matched cohorts (0 vs. 3.7%, p = 0.11 and 7.4 vs. 5.6%, p = 0.75). FIB-MCS were less likely to be re-hospitalized [Odd Ratio: 0.32, CI:0.13-0.76] and 2% to 3% higher KCCQ-12 score., Conclusion: TF-TAVR using FIB-MCS is feasible and safe with shorter OR time, ICU and hospital LOS, lower risk of 30-day re-hospitalization, similar 30-day and 1-year mortality with better quality of life at 1-year follow-up., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study sought to examine the feasibility, safety, clinical outcomes, and costs associated with computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR CT ) in acute chest pain (ACP) patients in a coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA)-based triage program., Background: FFR CT is useful in determining lesion-specific ischemia in patients with stable ischemic heart disease, but its utility in ACP has not been studied., Methods: ACP patients with no known coronary artery disease undergoing coronary CTA and coronary CTA with FFR CT were studied. FFR CT  ≤0.80 was considered positive for hemodynamically significant stenosis., Results: Among 555 patients, 297 underwent coronary CTA and FFR CT (196 negative, 101 positive), whereas 258 had coronary CTA only. The rejection rate for FFR CT was 1.6%. At 90 days, there was no difference in major adverse cardiac events (including death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and unexpected revascularization after the index visit) between the coronary CTA and FFR CT groups (4.3% vs. 2.7%; p = 0.310). Diagnostic failure, defined as discordance between the coronary CTA or FFR CT results with invasive findings, did not differ between the groups (1.9% vs. 1.68%; p = NS). No deaths or myocardial infarction occurred with negative FFR CT when revascularization was deferred. Negative FFR CT was associated with higher nonobstructive disease on invasive coronary angiography (56.5%) than positive FFR CT (8.0%) and coronary CTA (22.9%) (p < 0.001). There was no difference in overall costs between the coronary CTA and FFR CT groups ($8,582 vs. $8,048; p = 0.550)., Conclusions: In ACP, FFR CT is feasible, with no difference in major adverse cardiac events and costs compared with coronary CTA alone. Deferral of revascularization is safe with negative FFR CT , which is associated with higher nonobstructive disease on invasive angiography., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography (FFR CT ) is increasingly used in patients with coronary artery disease as a gatekeeper to the catheterization laboratory. While there is emerging evidence of the clinical benefit of FFR CT in patients with moderate coronary disease as determined with coronary CT angiography, there has been less focus on interpretation, reporting, and integration of FFR CT results into routine clinical practice. Because FFR CT analysis provides a plethora of information regarding pressure and flow across the entire coronary tree, standardized criteria on interpretation and reporting of the FFR CT analysis result are of crucial importance both in context of the clinical adoption and in future research. This report represents expert opinion and recommendation on a standardized FFR CT interpretation and reporting approach. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license., Competing Interests: Disclosures of Conflicts of Interest: B.L.N. Activities related to the present article: disclosed no relevant relationships. Activities not related to the present article: has received unrestricted institutional research grants from Siemens and HeartFlow; travel expenses covered at TCT 2017 by HeartFlow (no personal payment). Other relationships: disclosed no relevant relationships. T.A.F. Activities related to the present article: disclosed no relevant relationships. Activities not related to the present article: has been an invited speaker sponsored by HeartFlow. Other relationships: disclosed no relevant relationships. R.D.S. disclosed no relevant relationships. M.G.R. Activities related to the present article: disclosed no relevant relationships. Activities not related to the present article: author is consultant for HeartFlow. Other relationships: disclosed no relevant relationships. B.K. Activities related to the present article: has been an invited speaker at symposiums sponsored by Canon Medical, Medtronic, and St Jude, and has received research funding from Canon Medical. Activities not related to the present article: disclosed no relevant relationships. Other relationships: disclosed no relevant relationships. J.M.J. disclosed no relevant relationships. K.N. Activities related to the present article: disclosed no relevant relationships. Activities not related to the present article: unrestricted institutional research support from HeartFlow, Siemens, GE, and Bayer; coverage of travel expenses to the present study results at the TCT in 2018 by HeartFlow; Steering committee ADVANCE registry for HeartFlow (unpaid). Other relationships: disclosed no relevant relationships. K.M.C. Activities related to the present article: institution receives grant from HeartFlow. Activities not related to the present article: Medical Advisory Board for HeartFlow (no personal compensation); institution receives grants from HeartFlow. Other relationships: disclosed no relevant relationships. N.P.S. disclosed no relevant relationships. H.M. disclosed no relevant relationships. J.L. Activities related to the present article: disclosed no relevant relationships. Activities not related to the present article: has received speaker honoraria from GE Healthcare, served as a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences, and served as a consultant and has stock options in Circle CVI and HeartFlow; has core laboratory contracts with Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Abbott, Noevasc; research support from Edwards. Other relationships: disclosed no relevant relationships. G.R. disclosed no relevant relationships., (2019 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.)

Background: Invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR INV ) is the standard technique for assessing myocardial ischemia. Pressure distortions and measurement location may influence FFR INV interpretation. We report a technique for performing invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR INV ) by minimizing pressure distortions and identifying the proper location to measure FFR INV ., Methods: FFR INV recordings were obtained prospectively during manual hyperemic pullback in 100 normal and diseased coronary arteries with single stenosis, using 4 measurements from the terminal vessel, distal-to-the-lesion, proximal vessel, and guiding catheter. FFR INV profiles were developed by plotting FFR INV values ( y -axis) and site of measurement ( x -axis), stratified by stenosis severity. FFR INV ≤0.8 was considered positive for lesion-specific ischemia., Results: Erroneous FFR INV values were observed in 10% of vessels because of aortic pressure distortion and in 21% because of distal pressure drift; these were corrected by disengagement of the guiding catheter and re-equalization of distal pressure/aortic pressure, respectively. There were significant declines in FFR INV from the proximal to the terminal vessel in normal and stenotic coronary arteries ( P <0.001). The rate of positive FFR INV was 41% when measured from the terminal vessel and 20% when measured distal-to-the-lesion ( P <0.001); 41.5% of positive terminal measurements were reclassified to negative when measured distal-to-the-lesion. Measuring FFR INV 20 to 30 mm distal-to-the-lesion (rather than from the terminal vessel) can reduce errors in measurement and optimize the assessment of lesion-specific ischemia., Conclusions: Meticulous technique (disengagement of the guiding catheter, FFR INV pullback) is required to avoid erroneous FFR INV , which occur in 31% of vessels. Even with optimal technique, FFR INV values are influenced by stenosis severity and the site of pressure measurement. FFR INV values from the terminal vessel may overestimate lesion-specific ischemia, leading to unnecessary revascularization.

Fractional flow reserve derived by coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA; FFRCT) is an accurate noninvasive method for identifying coronary artery disease (CAD) and detecting hemodynamically significant stenosis. Although initially proposed as noninvasive tools to "rule out" significant CAD in low-risk patients, CTA and FFRCT are now utilized in higher-risk patients. Furthermore, new applications of CTA and FFRCT include a planning tool for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), which allows the cardiologist to assess lesion-specific ischemia, plan stent locations and sizes, and use virtual remodeling of the lumen (virtual stenting) to assess the functional impact of PCI. The purpose of this review is to discuss the principles of CTA and FFRCT acquisition, and their application for PCI planning, even before invasive angiography is performed., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Fractional flow reserve (FFR)-derived from computed tomography angiography (CTA; FFRCT) and invasive FFR (FFRINV) are used to assess the need for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The optimal location for measuring FFR and the impact of measurement location have not been well defined., Methods: 930 patients (age 60.7 + 10 years, 59% male) were included in this study. Normal and diseased coronary arteries were classified into stenosis grades 0-4 in the left anterior descending artery (LAD, n = 518), left circumflex (LCX, n = 112) and right coronary artery (RCA, n = 585). FFRCT (n = 1215 arteries) and FFRINV (n = 26 LAD) profiles were developed by plotting FFR values (y-axis) versus site of measurement (x-axis: ostium, proximal, mid, distal segments). The best location to measure FFR was defined relative to the distal end of the stenosis. FFR ≤0.8 was considered positive for ischemia., Results: In normal and stenotic coronary arteries there are significant declines in FFRCT and FFRINV from the ostium to the distal vessel (p < 0.001), due to lesion-specific ischemia and to effects unrelated to the lesion. A reliable location (distal to the stenosis) is 10.5 mm [IQR 7.3-14.8 mm] for FFRCT and within 20-30 mm for FFRINV. Rates of positive FFR (from the distal vessel) reclassified to negative FFR (distal to the stenosis) are 61% (FFRCT) and 33% (FFRINV)., Conclusion: FFRCT and FFRINV values are influenced by stenosis severity and the site of measurement. FFR measurements from the distal vessel may over-estimate lesion-specific ischemia and result in unnecessary referrals for ICA and PCI., (Copyright © 2018 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: We describe the characteristics of atherosclerotic plaque in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) using near-infrared spectroscopy-intravascular ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS) BACKGROUND: Imaging and autopsy studies have described atherosclerotic plaque in different vascular beds, including varying degrees of lipid, fibrosis, and calcification. Recently, NIRS has been validated as an accurate method for detecting lipid-core plaque (LCP) in the coronary circulation. Invasive evaluation of plaque composition using NIRS-IVUS has not been reported in different peripheral arterial circulations., Methods: We performed invasive angiography and NIRS-IVUS in consecutive PAD patients prior to percutaneous revascularization. Imaging evaluation included parameters from angiography, IVUS, and NIRS. NIRS-IVUS findings were compared among different vascular beds with regard to the presence and extent of calcification and LCP., Results: One hundred and forty-nine lesions in 126 PAD patients were enrolled, including the internal carotid (n = 10), subclavian/axillary (n = 9), renal (n = 14), iliac (n = 35), femoropopliteal (n = 69), and infrapopliteal (n = 12) arteries. Plaque morphology was calcified in 132 lesions (89%) and fibrous in 17 lesions (11%). Calcification varied from 100% of renal artery stenoses to 55% of subclavian/axillary artery stenoses. LCP was present in 48 lesions (32%) and prevalence varied from 60% in carotid artery stenoses to 0% in renal artery stenoses (P < 0.005). LCP was only observed in fibrocalcific plaque, and was longitudinally and circumferentially surrounded by a more extensive degree of calcium., Conclusions: NIRS-IVUS in stable PAD patients demonstrates a high frequency of calcific plaque and statistically significant differences in the frequency of LCP in different arterial beds. LCP, when present in the peripheral circulation, is always associated with calcified plaque. The strong co-localization of calcified plaque and LCP in severe PAD lesions may provide plaque-stabilizing effects; further studies are needed. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

In patients with carotid stenosis, the most common cause of stroke is atheroembolization, and the risk is strongly related to stenosis severity and symptomatic status (stroke or transient ischemic attack within 6months). Carotid revascularization by carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) results in plaque "passivation" by lumen enlargement, plaque removal, or plaque coverage with subsequent endothelialization. While there is considerable circumstantial evidence linking a decrease in the risk of stroke to the use of "optimal medical therapy (OMT)", the components of OMT have not been defined, and such therapy has not been rigorously evaluated in any randomized clinical trial (RCT) compared with revascularization. Studies of other vascular patients suggest that statins decrease the risk of stroke by anti-inflammatory effects, rather than cholesterol reduction. The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stent Trial (CREST-2) is currently randomizing standard-risk patients with asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis to OMT alone versus OMT plus CEA or CAS, but results are not expected until 2020. In the meantime, data from several "landmark" trials of CEA versus aspirin demonstrated 45-65% reduction in the 5-year risk of stroke after CEA. Several RCTs demonstrate superiority of CAS over CEA in high-risk patients (those at high-risk for CEA), and equivalence of CAS and CEA in standard-risk patients (those at acceptable risk for CEA). Compared with CEA, CAS is associated with significantly less periprocedural myocardial infarction, cranial nerve injury, and neurological injury (cranial nerve injury plus stroke); higher risk of minor stroke; and similar risk of long-term stroke. Features that increase the risk of CAS include complex aortic arch and carotid anatomy, and features that increase the risk of CEA include severe underlying cardiopulmonary disease and hostile neck anatomy; age>80years, especially those with baseline cognitive impairment, are at higher risk for stroke after CEA and CAS., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of this study is to characterize the plaque morphology of severe stenoses in the superficial femoral artery (SFA) employing combined near-infrared spectroscopy and intravascular ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS). Atherosclerosis is the most common cause of symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. Plaque composition of SFA stenoses has been characterized as primarily fibrous or fibrocalcific by non-invasive and autopsy studies. NIRS has been validated to detect lipid-core plaque (LCP) in the coronary circulation. We imaged severe SFA stenoses with NIRS-IVUS prior to revascularization in 31 patients (46 stenoses) with Rutherford claudication ⩾ class 3. Angiographic parameters included lesion location and stenosis severity. IVUS parameters included plaque burden and presence of calcium. NIRS images were analyzed for LCP and maximum lipid-core burden index in a 4-mm length of artery (maxLCBI4mm). By angiography, 38 (82.6%) lesions were calcified and 9 (19.6%) were chronic total occlusions. Baseline stenosis severity and lesion length were 86.0 ± 11.0% and 36.5 ± 46.5 mm, respectively. NIRS-IVUS identified calcium in 45 (97.8%) lesions and LCP in 17 (37.0%) lesions. MaxLCBI4mm was 433 ± 244. All lesions with LCP also contained calcium; there were no non-calcified lesions with LCP. In conclusion, this is the first study of combined NIRS-IVUS in patients with PAD. NIRS-IVUS demonstrates that nearly all patients with symptomatic severe SFA disease have fibrocalcific plaque, and one-third of such lesions contain LCP. These findings contrast with those in patients with acute coronary syndromes, and may have implications regarding the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis in different vascular beds., (© The Author(s) 2016.)

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has become an integral part of the therapeutic armamentarium offered by cardiovascular medicine programs for the prevention of stroke. The purpose of this expert consensus statement is to provide physician training and credentialing guidance to facilitate the safe and effective incorporation of CAS into clinical practice within these programs. Since publication of the 2005 Clinical Competence Statement on Carotid Stenting, there has been substantial device innovation, publication of numerous clinical trials and observational studies, accumulation of extensive real-world clinical experience and widespread participation in robust national quality improvement initiatives [5]. Collectively, these advances have led to substantial evolution in the selection of appropriate patients, as well as in the cognitive, technical and clinical skills required to perform safe and effective CAS. Herein, we summarize published guidelines, describe training pathways, outline elements of competency, offer strategies for tracking outcomes, specify facility, equipment and personnel requirements, and propose criteria for maintenance of CAS competency., (© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)