Back to Search Start Over

Late Outcomes of Patients in the Emergency Department With Acute Chest Pain Evaluated With Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve.

Authors :
Schott J
Allen O
Rollins Z
Cami E
Chinnaiyan K
Gallagher M
Fonte TA
Bilolikar A
Safian RD
Source :
The American journal of cardiology [Am J Cardiol] 2024 Sep 01; Vol. 226, pp. 65-71. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 13.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Computed tomography (CTA)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR <subscript>CT</subscript> ) guides the need for invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Late outcomes after FFR <subscript>CT</subscript> are reported in stable ischemic heart disease but not in acute chest pain in the emergency department (ACP-ED). The objectives are to assess the risk of death, myocardial infarction (MI), revascularization, and ICA after FFR <subscript>CT</subscript> . From 2015 to 2018, 389 low-risk patients with ACP-ED (negative biomarkers, no electrocardiographic ischemia) underwent CTA and FFR <subscript>CT</subscript> and were entered into a prospective institutional registry; patients were followed up for 41 ± 10 months. CTA stenosis ≥50% was present in 81% of the patients. Positive (FFR <subscript>CT</subscript> ≤0.80) and negative FFR <subscript>CT</subscript> were observed in 124 (32%) and 265 patients (68%), respectively. ICA was performed in 108 of 124 patients (87%) with positive FFR <subscript>CT</subscript> and 89 of 265 patients (34%) with negative FFR <subscript>CT</subscript> (p <0.00001). Revascularization was performed in 87 of 124 (70%) patients with positive FFR <subscript>CT</subscript> and in 22 of 265 (8%) with negative FFR <subscript>CT</subscript> (p <0.00001). Appropriateness of revascularization was established by blinded adjudication of ICA and invasive FFR using practice guidelines; revascularization was appropriate in 81 of 124 (65%) and 6 of 265 (2%) of FFR <subscript>CT</subscript> -positive and -negative patients, respectively (p <0.00001). At follow-up, for patients with positive versus negative FFR <subscript>CT</subscript> , the rates were 0.8% versus 0% for death (p = 0.32) and 1.6% versus 0.4% for MI (p = 0.24). In conclusion, in low-risk patients with ACP-ED who underwent CTA and FFR <subscript>CT</subscript> , the risk of late death (0.2%) and MI (0.7%) are low. Negative FFR <subscript>CT</subscript> is associated with excellent long-term prognosis, and positive FFR <subscript>CT</subscript> predicts obstructive disease requiring revascularization. FFR <subscript>CT</subscript> can safely triage patients with ACP-ED and reduce unnecessary ICA and revascularization.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Fonte is an employee of HeartFlow, Inc. and owns equity or stocks. The remaining authors have no competing interests to declare.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-1913
Volume :
226
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The American journal of cardiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38879060
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.06.008