Search

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) refers to tumors that do not express clinically significant levels of estrogen and progesterone receptors, and lack membrane overexpression or gene amplification of ErbB-2/HER2, a receptor tyrosine kinase. Transcriptome and proteome heterogeneity of TNBC poses a major challenge to precision medicine. Clinical biomarkers and targeted therapies for this disease remain elusive, so chemotherapy has been the standard of care for early and metastatic TNBC. Our present findings placed ErbB-2 in an unanticipated scenario: the nucleus of TNBC (NErbB-2). Our study on ErbB-2 alternative splicing events, using a PCR-sequencing approach combined with an RNA interference strategy, revealed that TNBC cells express either the canonical (wild-type) ErbB-2, encoded by transcript variant 1, or the non-canonical ErbB-2 isoform c, encoded by alternative variant 3 (RefSeq), or both. These ErbB-2 isoforms function in the nucleus as transcription factors. Evicting both from the nucleus or silencing isoform c only, blocks TN cell and tumor growth. This reveals not only NErbB-2 canonical and alternative isoforms role as targets of therapy in TNBC, but also isoform c dominant oncogenic potential. Furthermore, we validated our findings in the clinic and observed that NErbB-2 correlates with poor prognosis in primary TN tumors, disclosing NErbB-2 as a novel biomarker for TNBC. Our discoveries challenge the present scenario of drug development for personalized BC medicine that focuses on wild-type RefSeq proteins, which conserve the canonical domains and are located in their classical cellular compartments. Fil: Chervo, María Florencia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina Fil: Cordo Russo, Rosalia Ines. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina Fil: Petrillo, Ezequiel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias; Argentina Fil: Izzo, Franco. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina Fil: de Martino, Mara. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina Fil: Bellora, Nicolás. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto Andino Patagónico de Tecnologías Biológicas y Geoambientales. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Instituto Andino Patagónico de Tecnologías Biológicas y Geoambientales; Argentina Fil: Cenciarini, Mauro Ezequiel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina Fil: Chiauzzi, Violeta Alicia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina Fil: Santa María de la Parra, Lucía. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina Fil: Pereyra Matías G.. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina Fil: Güttlein, Leandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires. Fundación Instituto Leloir. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires; Argentina Fil: Podhajcer, Osvaldo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires. Fundación Instituto Leloir. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires; Argentina Fil: Daniotti, Jose Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones en Química Biológica de Córdoba. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Centro de Investigaciones en Química Biológica de Córdoba; Argentina Fil: Dupont, Agustina. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital General de Agudos "Juan A. Fernández"; Argentina Fil: Barchuk, Sabrina. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital General de Agudos "Juan A. Fernández"; Argentina Fil: Figurelli, Silvina. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital General de Agudos "Juan A. Fernández"; Argentina Fil: Lopez Della Vecchia, Daniel Edgardo. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital General de Agudos "Juan A. Fernández"; Argentina Fil: Roa, Juan Carlos. Universidad de La Frontera. Núcleo Científico y Tecnológico en Recursos Naturales; Chile. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile Fil: Guzmán, Pablo. Universidad de La Frontera. Núcleo Científico y Tecnológico en Recursos Naturales; Chile Fil: Proietti Anastasi, Cecilia Jazmín. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina Fil: Schillaci, Roxana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina Fil: Elizalde, Patricia Virginia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is clinically defined by the absence of estrogen and progesterone receptors and the lack of membrane overexpression or gene amplification of the receptor tyrosine kinase ErbB-2/HER2. Due to its heterogeneity, clinical biomarkers and targeted therapies for this disease remain elusive, and chemotherapy has been the standard of care for TNBC. ErbB-2 is classically located at the membrane of BC cells, where it triggers signaling cascades and promotes oncogenesis. We previously demonstrated that ErbB-2 is also localized in the nucleus (NErbB-2) of TNBC cells, from where it drives growth (1). We also discovered that TNBC expresses both wild-type ErbB-2 (WTErbB-2) and alternative ErbB-2 isoform c (ErbB-2c) (1). ErbB-2 migrates to the nucleus via retrograde transport. Here, we revealed that Retro-2, an inhibitor of retrograde transport that protects cells form the deleterious effects of toxins and viruses, evicts both WTErbB-2 and ErbB-2c from the nucleus of BC cells. Using BC models from several molecular subtypes, as well as normal breast cells, we demonstrated that Retro-2 specifically halts the proliferation of cells expressing NErbB-2. Moreover, Retro-2 decreased the expression of genes induced by NErbB-2 (i. e. cyclin D1 and Erk5) and promoted cell cycle arrest at G0/G1 phase and apoptosis. In addition to R2 growth inhibitory activity in vitro, we here also demonstrated that its optimized cyclic derivative Retro-2.1 (in particular the (S)-enantiomer) showed improved efficacy both to evict ErbB-2 isoforms from the nucleus and to inhibit proliferation in vitro. Importantly, Retro-2 eviction of both ErbB-2 isoforms from the nucleus resulted in a striking growth abrogation in multiple TNBC preclinical models, including xenografts and tumor explants). Our mechanistic studies demonstrated that Retro-2 induces a differential accumulation of WTErbB-2 at the early endosomes and plasma membrane, and of ErbB-2c at the Golgi, shedding light both on Retro-2 action on endogenous protein cargoes undergoing retrograde transport and on the biology of ErbB-2 splicing variants. Compelling evidence demonstrated that mRNAs 5' and 3' untranslated regions (UTRs) mediate post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression and determine protein levels and fate. While both T1 and T3 have different 5' but the same 3' UTRs sequences, our in silico studies showed that T1 and T3 RNA secondary structures vary in the region containing both their 5' and 3' UTRs. These findings suggest that T3 secondary structure impacts in its cell specific localization. Together, our present discoveries identify R2 as a precision oncology tool to target NErbB-2 retrograde transport. This novel theragnostic approach could greatly improve the outcome of TNBC patients. (1) Chervo MF et al, Oncogene 2020: 39: 6245-62. Presentation: No date and time listed

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) refers to tumors that do not express clinically significant levels of estrogen and progesterone receptors, and lack membrane overexpression or gene amplification of ErbB-2 tyrosine kinase receptor. Transcriptome and proteome heterogeneity of TNBC poses a major challenge to precision medicine. Gene expression analyses have categorized TNBC into distinct molecular subtypes. Up to 78% of clinical TNBCs belong to the basal-like (BL) subtype. Here we found ErbB-2 in an unanticipated scenario: the nucleus of TNBC (NErbB-2). Our study on ErbB-2 alternative splicing, using a PCR-sequencing approach combined with RNA interference, revealed that BL TNBC cells express the canonical ErbB-2 (WTErbB-2), encoded by transcript 1, and the non-canonical isoform c, encoded by alternative transcript 3 (T3). The latter was not previously reported in normal or malignant cells. To characterize the isoform c we designed siRNAs targeting T3 (T3 siRNAs), which silenced up to 93% of said isoform. Transfection of T3 siRNAs into BL cells expressing only isoform c or both isoform c and WTErbB-2 was sufficient to decrease cell proliferation. Intratumoral injections of T3 siRNAs into mice bearing BL TN tumors also blocked in vivo growth. To explore whether isoform c growth-promoting effect is due to its functions as a transcriptional regulator, we performed RNA-seq in BL cells expressing only this isoform. We identified a set of genes differentially regulated in BL cells where we evicted isoform c from the nucleus, as compared to control cells. In the up-regulated group, we found enrichment of pro-apoptotic and tumor suppressor genes and in the down-regulated one, genes involved in proliferation and stemness. We used gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) to identify the biological processes associated with these isoform c-regulated genes. We found a pronounced enrichment of gene sets related to apoptosis, activation of DNA damage pathways and cell cycle arrest in response to eviction of nuclear isoform c. GSEA also revealed negative regulation of gene sets involved in cell motility, cellular differentiation and growth pathways in BL cells lacking nuclear isoform c expression. These results suggest that NErbB-2 function modulates tumor growth and promotes a metastatic phenotype in TNBC. Furthermore, our clinical findings identified NErbB-2 as an independent predictor of shorter OS (HR 2.54; 95% CI 1.22-5.28; P = 0.013), DFS (HR 2.91; 95% CI 1.44-5.87; P = 0.003), and DMFS (HR 2.59; 95% CI 1.20-5.60; P = 0.015) in 99 TN primary tumors. Our discoveries challenge the present scenario of drug development for personalized BC medicine that focuses on wild-type proteins, which conserve the canonical domains and are located in their classical cellular compartments, highlighting the potential of NErbB-2 isoforms as novel therapeutic targets and clinical biomarkers in TNBC.

Hormone receptor-positive (HR+, estrogen and/or progesterone receptor-positive) and HER2-negative breast cancer (BC) subtype is a biologically heterogeneous entity that comprises 70% of BCs. This subtype includes both luminal (Lum) A- and B-like subtypes, which have differences in prognosis and sensitivity to endocrine therapies. The development of biomarkers guiding treatment decisions in these settings is required. Tumor suppressor PDCD4 (programmed cell death 4), which can be found both in the nucleus (NPDCD4) or the cytoplasm (CPDCD4), inhibits tumor growth and metastasis, and its loss is associated with poor prognosis in solid tumors. To explore the clinical relevance of PDCD4 in BC, we analyzed its expression by immunohistochemistry in a cohort of 619 patients with primary invasive BC. We found that 34.7% of patients showed NPDCD4 and 21.3% showed CPDCD4. NPDCD4 positivity, but not CPDCD4, was associated with lower clinical stage (P = 0.0003), with presence of more differentiated tumors (P = 6.4x10-6), and with estrogen and progesterone receptor (PR) expression (P = 9.2x10-9 and P = 2.8x10-9, respectively). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that NPDCD4 expression was associated with a longer overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in LumA-like (P = 0.008 and P = 0.028, respectively) and LumB-like (P = 0.004 and P = 0.012, respectively) subtypes. Interestingly, patients with LumB-like tumors displaying NPDCD4 presented estimated OS and DFS rates similar to the ones observed in patients with LumA-like tumors also expressing NPDCD4, indicating that its presence improves the clinical outcome of LumB-like patients. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified NPDCD4 as an independent predictor of good clinical outcome in both LumA-like (HR: 0.45, 95% CI 0.22-0.96, P = 0.038) and LumB-like (HR: 0.28, 95% CI 0.10-0.80, P = 0.018) subtypes. We validated our results by in silico analysis using expression data from the METABRIC cohort. Bioinformatics analysis of BC cells from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia revealed a positive correlation between PDCD4 and PR expression (P = 0.015). Since LumB-like tumors present a higher risk of resistance to endocrine therapy and both PR and PDCD4 levels in this subtype are lower than in the LumA-like one, we postulated that the presence of PR may modulate PDCD4 expression. Silencing of PR expression in HR+ cells decreased PDCD4 protein levels while reconstitution of PR in a PR-null cell line increased them, confirming PR requirement for PDCD4 modulation. In line with PDCD4 physiological function, its knockdown increased cell migration capability of HR+ BC cells, whereas its restoration led to a decrease in cell migration of HR-negative BC models. Our findings identified NPDCD4 positivity as a novel biomarker of clinical outcome in LumA- and B-like subtypes and revealed PDCD4 reconstitution as a novel therapeutic strategy in BC.

The hormone receptor-positive (estrogen and/or progesterone receptor (PR)-positive) and HER2-negative breast cancer (BC) subtype is a biologically heterogeneous entity that includes luminal A-like (LumA-like) and luminal B-like (LumB-like) subtypes. Decreased PR levels is a distinctive biological feature of LumB-like tumors. These tumors also show reduced sensitivity to endocrine therapies and poorer prognosis than LumA-like tumors. Identification of biomarkers to accurately predict disease relapse in these subtypes is crucial in order to select effective therapies. We identified the tumor suppressor PDCD4 (programmed cell death 4), located in the nucleus (NPDCD4), as an independent prognostic factor of good clinical outcome in LumA-like and LumB-like subtypes. NPDCD4-positive LumB-like tumors presented overall and disease-free survival rates comparable to those of NPDCD4-positive LumA-like tumors, indicating that NPDCD4 improves the outcome of LumB-like patients. In contrast, NPDCD4 loss increased the risk of disease recurrence and death in LumB-like compared with LumA-like tumors. This, along with our results showing that LumB-like tumors present lower NPDCD4 positivity than LumA-like tumors, suggests that NPDCD4 loss contributes to endocrine therapy resistance in LumB-like BCs. We also revealed that PR induces PDCD4 transcription in LumB-like BC, providing a mechanistic explanation to the low PDCD4 levels in LumB-like BCs lacking PR. Finally, PDCD4 silencing enhanced BC cell survival in a patient-derived explant model of LumB-like disease. Our discoveries highlight NPDCD4 as a novel biomarker in LumA- and LumB-like subtypes, which could be included in the panel of immunohistochemical markers used in the clinic to accurately predict the prognosis of LumB-like tumors. Fil: Madera, Santiago. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina Fil: Chervo, María Florencia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina Fil: Chiauzzi, Violeta Alicia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina Fil: Pereyra Matías G.. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina Fil: Venturutti, Leandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina Fil: Izzo, Franco. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina Fil: Roldán Deamicis, Agustina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina Fil: Guzmán, Pablo. Universidad de La Frontera. Núcleo Científico y Tecnológico en Recursos Naturales; Chile Fil: Dupont, Agustina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina Fil: Roa, Juan Carlos. Universidad de La Frontera. Núcleo Científico y Tecnológico en Recursos Naturales; Chile. Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile Fil: Cenciarini, Mauro Ezequiel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina Fil: Barchuk, Sabrina. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital General de Agudos "Juan A. Fernández"; Argentina Fil: Figurelli, Silvina. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital General de Agudos "Juan A. Fernández"; Argentina Fil: Lopez Della Vecchia, Daniel Edgardo. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital General de Agudos "Juan A. Fernández"; Argentina Fil: Levit, Claudio. Sanatorio Sagrado Corazón. Servicio de Ginecología; Argentina Fil: Lebersztein, Gabriel. Sanatorio Sagrado Corazón. Servicio de Ginecología; Argentina Fil: Anfuso, Fabiana. Sanatorio Sagrado Corazón. Servicio de Ginecología; Argentina Fil: Castiglioni, Teresa. Centro de Patología Dr. Elsner; Argentina Fil: Cortese, Eduardo Mateo. Hospital Aeronáutico Central. Servicio de Ginecología; Argentina Fil: Ares, Sandra. Instituto Oncológico Henry Moore; Argentina Fil: Gil Deza, Ernesto. Instituto Oncológico Henry Moore; Argentina Fil: Gercovich, Felipe G.. Instituto Oncológico Henry Moore; Argentina Fil: Proietti Anastasi, Cecilia Jazmín. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina Fil: Schillaci, Roxana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina Fil: Cordo Russo, Rosalía I.. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina Fil: Elizalde, Patricia Virginia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) refers to a subtype of tumors with poor prognosis, devoid of hormone receptors and of membrane overexpression or gene amplification of ErbB-2. Due to its molecular heterogeneity, TNBC represents a major clinical challenge. In this regard, clinical biomarkers and targeted therapies remain elusive, and chemotherapy has been the standard of care for early and metastatic TNBC. ErbB-2, a member of the ErbB family of tyrosine kinase receptors, is a major player in the BC scenario. While it is a cell membrane-bound receptor, it migrates to the nucleus (NErbB-2) where it acts as a transcription factor or coactivator. We recently found that both the canonical (wild-type, WT) ErbB-2 and the alternative isoform c are located in the nucleus of TNBC, a scenario with an aggressive oncogenic potential. The route of intracellular transport from the plasma membrane to the trans Golgi network (TGN) and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is termed retrograde trafficking, and constitutes the pathway by which ErbB-2 migrates to the nucleus. The retrograde transport route is also hijacked by toxins and viruses to access the ER and exert their deleterious effects. Retro-2, a small molecule inhibitor, was shown to protect cells from toxin and virus effects by blocking their retrograde trafficking. Given the high levels of NErbB-2 in TNBC cells, we explored whether treatment with Retro-2 modulates localization of ErbB-2 and proliferation in TNBC. We found that Retro-2 treatment decreased the levels of both WT ErbB-2 and isoform c in the nucleus of TNBC cells demonstrating that Retro-2 effects are not limited to a particular ErbB-2 isoform. Indeed, immunofluorescence assays revealed accumulation of ErbB-2 in the Golgi after Retro-2 treatment further preventing its sorting to the ER. We previously demonstrated that growth factors induce ErbB-2 migration into the nucleus in ErbB-2-positive BC cells. Consistently, we observed that Retro-2 prevents growth factor-induced NErbB-2 in ErbB-2-positive BC cells. Retro-2 treatment resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in cell proliferation in a panel of TNBC cells, whilst did not inhibit cell proliferation in the ErbB-2-negative MCF10A normal breast cell line. Moreover, disruption of retrograde transport by Retro-2 decreased the expression of cell cycle related NErbB-2 target genes (i.e. Erk5 and cyclin D1) therefore inducing cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 phase. Most importantly, Retro-2 excluded ErbB-2 from the nucleus and abrogated tumor growth in preclinical models of TNBC. Collectively, our findings reveal Retro-2, a non-toxic inhibitor of the retrograde transport route, as a candidate novel therapeutic agent for TNBC based on its ability to evict ErbB-2 from the nucleus and to abrogate TNBC growth.

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) has poor prognosis and neither established biomarkers nor therapeutic targets. On the one hand the androgen receptor (AR), a steroid hormone receptor (SR) which is expressed in 10-53% of TNBC and proved to be critical for BC proliferation, has been proposed as a new target in TNBC. On the other hand, we and others have shown that membrane ErbB-2 migrates to the nucleus (nuclear ErbB-2, NErbB-2) where it binds DNA at HER-2 associated sequences (HAS) to regulate BC proliferation and migration. Since we have previously shown a functional interplay between growth factors and SR signaling pathways in BC, we propose the existence of an interaction between AR and ErbB-2 which is involved in NErbB-2+/AR+ BC growth. The experimental model used was the human TNBC cell line MDA-MB-453 which displays high expression levels of AR and NErbB-2. By Western Blot (WB) we found that dihydrotestosterone (DHT) treatment for short times (minutes) did not regulate ErbB-2 phosphorylation status at residues Tyr1221/1222 and 1248 which were constitutively activated. However, DHT led to an increase in ErbB-2 phosphorylation at residue Tyr877 which we have proved to be required for ErbB-2 nuclear migration. The latter effect was blocked by the AR antagonist enzalutamide (enza). Blockage of Src activity with dasatinib inhibited DHT-induced ErbB-2 phosphorylation at Tyr877. By Immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy analyses and subcellular fractionation studies we demonstrated that DHT induced ErbB-2 nuclear migration which was inhibited by enza. By chIP we found that DHT induced ErbB-2 recruitment to a HAS site in ERK5, a gene involved in BC proliferation, and to a HAS site in FKBP5, a classical AR responsive gene. By WB we demonstrated that transfection with an ErbB-2 mutant which is unable to translocate to the nucleus and functions as a dominant negative inhibitor of ErbB-2 nuclear migration (hErbB-2ΔNLS), inhibited FKBP51 up-regulation by DHT. Finally, by microarray and bioinformatics analysis we identified 315 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the presence of DHT and NErbB-2 eviction. Enrichment analyses showed that the DEGs belonged to the immune response and interferon pathways. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the expression of 6 genes was significantly associated with overall survival in TNBC patients from the METABRIC cohort: CXCL10, TAP1, STAT1, NMI, HLA-A and NLRC5. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified the combined expression of the 6 genes as an independent predictor of better clinical outcome in TNBC (HR: 0.56, 95% CI 0.38-0.82, P = 0.003). In conclusion, our findings evidence that DHT-activated AR induces Src-mediated ErbB-2 rapid activation and its migration to the nucleus where it binds to HAS sites in the DNA. Moreover, based on the DEGs of NErbB-2 eviction in presence of DHT we identified a gene signature associated with favorable outcome in TNBC.

Membrane overexpression of ErbB-2 (MErbB-2), a member of the ErbB family of receptor tyrosine kinases, occurs in 15– 20% of breast cancers (BC) and constitutes a therapeutic target in this BC subtype (ErbB-2-positive). Although MErbB-2- targeted therapies have significantly improved patients’ clinical outcome, resistance to available drugs is still a major issue in the clinic. Lack of accurate biomarkers for predicting responses to anti-ErbB-2 drugs at the time of diagnosis is also an important unresolved issue. Hence, a better understanding of the ErbB-2 signaling pathway constitutes a critical task in the battle against BC. In its canonical mechanism of action, MErbB-2 activates downstream signaling pathways, which transduce its proliferative effects in BC. The dogma of ErbB-2 mechanism of action has been challenged by the demonstration that MErbB-2 migrates to the nucleus, where it acts as a transcriptional regulator. Accumulating findings demonstrate that nuclear ErbB-2 (NErbB-2) is involved in BC growth and metastasis. Emerging evidence also reveal a role of NErbB-2 in the response to available anti-MErbB-2 agents. Here, we will review NErbB-2 function in BC and will particularly discuss the role of NErbB-2 as a novel target for therapy in ErbB-2-positive BC. Fil: Cordo Russo, Rosalia Ines. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina Fil: Chervo, María Florencia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina Fil: Madera, Santiago. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina Fil: Charreau, Eduardo Hernan. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina Fil: Elizalde, Patricia Virginia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina

Approximately 15-20% of breast cancers (BC) show either membrane overexpression of ErbB-2 (MErbB-2), a member of the ErbBs family of receptor tyrosine kinases, or ERBB2 gene amplification. Until the development of MErbB-2-targeted therapies, this BC subtype, called ErbB-2-positive, was associated with increased metastatic potential and poor prognosis. Although these therapies have significantly improved overall survival and cure rates, resistance to available drugs is still a major clinical issue. In its classical mechanism, MErbB-2 activates downstream signaling cascades, which transduce its effects in BC. The fact that ErbB-2 is also present in the nucleus of BC cells was discovered over twenty years ago. Also, compelling evidence revealed a non-canonical function of nuclear ErbB-2 as a transcriptional regulator. As a deeper understanding of nuclear ErbB-2 actions would be crucial to the disclosure of its role as a biomarker and a target of therapy in BC, we will here review its function in BC, in particular, its role in growth, metastatic spreading and response to currently available MErbB-2-positive BC therapies. Fil: Elizalde, Patricia Virginia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina Fil: Cordo Russo, Rosalia Ines. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina Fil: Chervo, María Florencia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina Fil: Schillaci, Roxana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina

Accumulated findings have demonstrated the presence of bidirectional interactions between progesterone receptor (PR) and the ErbB family of receptor tyrosine kinases signaling pathways in breast cancer. We previously revealed signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (Stat3) as a nodal convergence point between said signaling pathways proving that Stat3 is activated by one of the ErbBs' ligands, heregulin (HRG)β1 via ErbB2 and through the co-option of PR as a signaling molecule. Here, we found that HRGβ1 induced Stat3 recruitment to the promoters of the progestin-regulated cell cycle modulators Bcl-XL and p21CIP1 and also stimulated Stat3 binding to the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter, which carries consensus progesterone response elements. Interestingly, HRGβ1-activated Stat3 displayed differential functions on PR activity depending on the promoter bound. Indeed, Stat3 was required for PR binding in bcl-X, p21CIP1, and c-myc promoters while exerting a PR coactivator function on the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter. Stat3 also proved to be necessary for HRGβ1-induced in vivo tumor growth. Our results endow Stat3 a novel function as a coregulator of HRGβ1-activated PR to promote breast cancer growth. These findings underscore the importance of understanding the complex interactions between PR and other regulatory factors, such as Stat3, that contribute to determine the context-dependent transcriptional actions of PR.

The role of the progesterone receptor (PR) in breast cancer remains a major clinical challenge. Although PR induces mammary tumor growth, its presence in breast tumors is a marker of good prognosis. We investigated coordinated PR rapid and nonclassical transcriptional effects governing breast cancer growth and endocrine therapy resistance. Fil: Díaz Flaqué, María Celeste. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental (i); Argentina Fil: Galigniana, Natalia Maricel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental (i); Argentina Fil: Beguelin, Wendy. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental (i); Argentina Fil: Vicario, Rocio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental (i); Argentina Fil: Proietti Anastasi, Cecilia Jazmín. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental (i); Argentina Fil: Cordo Russo, Rosalia Ines. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental (i); Argentina Fil: Rivas, Martin Alfredo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental (i); Argentina Fil: Tkach, Mercedes. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental (i); Argentina Fil: Guzmán, Pablo. Universidad de la Frontera; Chile Fil: Roa, Juan C.. Universidad de la Frontera; Chile Fil: Maronna, Esteban. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental (i); Argentina. Sanatorio Mater Dei; Argentina Fil: Pineda, Viviana. Universidad de la Frontera; Chile Fil: Muñoz, Sergio. Universidad de la Frontera; Chile Fil: Mercogliano, María Florencia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental (i); Argentina Fil: Charreau, Eduardo Hernan. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental (i); Argentina Fil: Yankilevich, Patricio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigación en Biomedicina de Buenos Aires; Argentina Fil: Schillaci, Roxana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental (i); Argentina Fil: Elizalde, Patricia Virginia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental (i); Argentina