Search

Copyright of Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Sozial Extra is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Recht & Psychiatrie is the property of Psychiatrie Verlag GmbH and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zentralblatt fuer Arbeitsmedizin, Arbeitsschutz und Ergonomie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Recht & Psychiatrie is the property of Psychiatrie Verlag GmbH and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Monatsschrift fuer Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform is the property of De Gruyter and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Professionally-led support groups are becoming a valuable component of health care. Professionally-led support groups are led by a professional or agency-based facilitator. The purpose of this paper is to consolidate the knowledge and the evidence for the effectiveness of professionally-led eating disorder support groups. The overall findings of the review suggest that professionally-led support groups increased social networks, learning coping strategies, reduction in psychological symptoms, and increased perceptions of the well-being of people living with eating disorders. Moreover, the professional-facilitator role in promoting trust and a sense of safety in the group and providing information support was also vital in supporting the participants. Future research ideas are presented. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Previous studies among the general population indicated an association between mental illnesses and different forms of financial difficulties, such as indebtedness. Objective: Investigation of the financial burden and associated factors among inpatients and day clinic patients in psychiatric care. Material and methods: A total of 488 patients in psychiatric care in the catchment area of the Psychiatric University Hospital Charité at St. Hedwig Hospital participated in a cross-sectional patient survey carried out with a structured interview regarding financial burden, sociodemographic and clinical variables. Results: Of the participants 269 (55.1%) showed outstanding debts, loans or unpaid bills. Among the participants who were willing to give information about the amount of debts, the majority (47.0%) had debts between 1000 € and 9999 € and 36.3% between 10,000 € and 99,999 €. In the binary regression models, younger age and substance use disorders were factors significantly associated with outstanding debts. Of the participants 22.3% had outstanding debts >10,000 € and were depending on social welfare, so that indebtedness could be assumed. Conclusion: Financial burdens and outstanding debts among patients in psychiatric care should be inquired about and considered more intensively in practice. Suitable models of support need to be developed and evaluated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Ethik in der Medizin is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Kehren Beschäftigte nach Abwesenheit an ihren Arbeitsplatz zurück, stellt dies oft einen krisenhaften Vorgang dar. Der Weg zurück ist nicht nur kritisch für Betroffene; auch die Arbeitsorganisation vor Ort wird irritiert. Vorgesetzte sind dann gefordert, Auswirkungen zu managen. Da Rückkehrvorgänge nicht immer abschließend betrieblich geregelt sind, ergeben sich Unbestimmtheitszonen, die Führungskräfte füllen müssen. Am Beispiel der betrieblichen Wiedereingliederung nach psychischer Erkrankung wird untersucht, wie Führungskräfte in diesen Unbestimmtheitszonen wirken und welchen Einfluss sie auf die Wiedereingliederung nehmen. Auf Basis von problemzentrierten Interviews mit Führungskräften wird gezeigt, dass sie als Gatekeeper fungieren und sich in einem Spannungsfeld zwischen ökonomischen und sozialen Ansprüchen bewegen. Ob Vorgesetzte stärker als Übergangshelfende für eine gelingende Reintegration sorgen oder sich als arbeitsökonomisch orientierte Krisenmanager erweisen, ist abhängig von organisationalen Rahmenbedingungen und individuellen Einstellungen. Returning to work is often a critical process. Being crucial for affected employees themselves, the local organization of work is irritated, too. Therefore, supervisors are challenged to manage resulting effects. Due to a lack of operational guidelines of processes of return to work, zones of indeterminacy appear that managers have to fill. Taking the example of return to the workplace after mental illness, it is examined how they deal with these zones of indeterminacy and how they affect occupational reintegration. Based on problem-centered interviews with supervisors it will be shown that they take the function of gatekeepers, acting in a field between economic and social demands. Whether they focus on successful reintegration or on economically oriented crisis management is a question of organizational circumstances and individual attitudes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of German Journal of Sports Medicine / Deutsche Zeitschrift fur Sportmedizin is the property of Verein zur Forderung der Sportmedizin Hannover e.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Interface management after inpatient care for mentally ill children and adolescents has been proven to be a breaking point in good transition of care between child and adolescent psychiatry, social welfare services, schools, job centre and the judicial system. Criteria for successful discharge management do not exist in child and adolescent psychiatry. Aim of the study ASpeKT was to survey parents on their perception of interface management and to derive recommendations for discharge management. Methods: Data regarding interface management were retrieved from parents (T3, n = 124, T4, n = 81) 6 months (T3) and 12 months (T4) after discharge. Results: The parents stated that accessible help after discharge from inpatient treatment is essential for stability and requires a good coordination. Parents named that they perceived helpful for successful interface management: a case manager, early round table meetings, support in returning to school, seamless access to outpatient follow-up appointments as well as information on further treatment options and contact data. Conclusion: From the perspective of affected families a proactive early individual and reliable care coordination by a constant contact person is essential for a good discharge management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The outbreak of the COVID-19 disease and the rapid spread of the inducing coronavirus SARS-CoV‑2 threatens not only people's physical health but also their mental health. Its influence on incidence and course of existing illnesses in the psychiatric outpatient sector in Germany is still unknown. Methods: The medical reports of 682 persons in psychiatric treatment were retrospectively investigated, regarding their subjective response to this pandemic and its clinical relevance. Results: Of the patients 60.5% (n = 378) experienced greater psychological stress, 14.5% (n = 99) reported fear of the SARS-CoV‑2 and the possible danger of infection, 25.5% (n = 174) reported fear resulting from the protective measures taken (lock down) and 4.3% (n = 29) reported fear of both. This differed significantly across diagnoses: people with anxiety disorders reported significantly greater stress as well as greater fear of the virus, whereas people with psychoses were significantly less affected than the other patients. Of the participants 43.7% (n = 132) were so strongly affected that acute treatment had to be implemented and 6.0% (n = 18) had to be referred to inpatient care. Discussion: People with mental illnesses are particularly vulnerable to the psychological strain of the COVID-19 pandemic. Long-term studies on the further course of disease will be necessary. Additional studies that test interventions to build resilience in this population will also be needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Discourse: Journal of Childhood & Adolescense Research / Diskurs Kindheits- und Jugendforschung is the property of Verlag Barbara Budrich GmbH and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie is the property of Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co. KG and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Psychotherapeut is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Sozial Extra is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Aim: Chronic mental disorders are not only present with symptoms, but also negative consequences on activities / capacities and life participation. This is especially relevant in the context of work. Diagnosis and treatment of mental disorders, which are often long-term disorders, must therefore be based on a bio-psycho-social understanding of illness according to the ICF (WHO, 2001). Differentiated description of capacities needs specific measurements. An established instrument for the description of 13 psychomental capacities, which is often used for work ability description and judgement, is the Mini-ICF-APP (Linden et al., 2009 , 2015). Method: In parallel to the Mini-ICF-APP, a self-rating version has been developed, the Mini-ICF-APP-S. This article reports data from 1134 patients with chronic mental disorders. Patients with workplace problems, patients without workplace problems and patients without workplace are compared concerning their self-reported capacity profiles. Results: Patients without workplace and patients with workplace problems have the most serious social-medical problems. The stronger the workplace problem, the lower do the patients report their capacities. Patients without workplace problem had partly better results in a cognitive ability test as compared to patients with workplace problem or without workplace. All three patient groups were with similar frequencies in a psychotherapeutic treatment. In their capacity profiles, the most often impaired capacities were proactivity, endurance, assertiveness, and flexibility. Dyadic relationships of capacity to adjust to rules or routines were seldomly perceived as impaired. Discussion: The variance of rating in the capacity profiles shows that patients described their capacity profiles differentiatedly (rather than giving the same scoring in several dimensions). Conclusion: The Mini-ICF-APP can be used economically in diagnostics, therapy planning and social-medicine decision making (work ability decisions). By focusing on "capacities" (instead of symptoms), clinicians and occupational physicians may introduce the topic work ability to their patients. Speaking about capacities offers a concrete, behavior-oriented, and potentially resource-oriented view on work-related health problems and findings solutions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Healthcare research in the living environment is focused on the scientific investigation of care, which is delivered in the personal environment of those affected by diseases. Objective: Presentation of the healthcare policy starting position, content and evidence of forms of care by which treatment focuses on the living environment of affected persons. Presentation of the RECOVER model, by which these forms of care are integrated and coordinated in a care model. Material and methods: Literature search on "care or treatment models" and "psychiatric disease" over the last 10 years. Results: Many experts are calling for the introduction of integrated and coordinated care as well as the digitalization of the healthcare system as essential future solutions. Evidence-based forms of care, which have a main focus on the living environment of those concerned, play an important role here. These include, for example early diagnosis and treatment of psychoses (early psychosis services, EPS), crisis resolution team (CRT), assertive community treatment (ACT), supported employment (SE) and e‑mental health. With the exception of CRT, which can be financed as a hospital ward equivalent treatment according to §§ 39 and 115d (German Social Code V, SGB V), many of these treatment models are not yet part of standard care in Germany. In an integrated and coordinated care system these components work together in a meaningful and coordinated manner in defined care processes. This approach is currently being tested using the so-called RECOVER model, a severity level, evidence-based and cross-sectoral coordinated care model, where implementation, testing and transfer from 2017–2020 will be promoted by the Innovation Fund of the Joint Federal Committee (G-BA). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Recht & Psychiatrie is the property of Psychiatrie Verlag GmbH and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie is the property of Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co. KG and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Psychische Erkrankung, vorheriges suizidales Verhalten und der Verlust eines Angehörigen durch Suizid gehören zu den stärksten Risikofaktoren für Suizid. Sowohl psychische Erkrankung als auch Suizidalität selbst sind stigmatisiert, was für Betroffene eine Belastung bedeutet, die zu suizidalen Gedanken und Handlungen beitragen kann. Viele Konsequenzen von Stigma, wie soziale Isolation, verringertes Selbstwertgefühl und Hoffnungslosigkeit, sind als Prädiktoren von Suizidalität bekannt. Maßnahmen zur Stigmareduktion könnten daher eine wichtige Komponente erfolgreicher Suizidprävention sein. Die vorliegende Arbeit erläutert den derzeitigen Forschungsstand zu dieser Hypothese. Eine Vielzahl von Studien bestätigt den Zusammenhang zwischen der Stigmatisierung psychischer Erkrankung und Suizidalität, und erste signifikante Ergebnisse über den Einfluss von Suizidstigma auf Suizidalität liegen vor. Dennoch wurde die Wirksamkeit bestehender Antistigma Interventionen zur Reduktion und Prävention von Suizidalität bisher nicht überprüft. Der Abbau von Stigma in der Allgemeinbevölkerung und unter Behandlern sowie Programme zur Unterstützung von Betroffenen im Umgang mit erlebter Stigmatisierung könnten wichtige Komponenten erfolgreicher Suizidprävention sein. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Exploring psychological work demands is the basis for preventive or rehabilitative action, e. g. mental hazard analysis or work adjustment. Can descriptions from employees be useful to describe work demands? The latter requires that the work description is not confounded with an affective judgment on the workplace, e. g. work-anxiety.Based on an ICF-based work capacity concept which is standard in socio-medical work ability description, we did a study with 124 employees from diverse professions. They were investigated concerning their work demands and their mental health status in a structured interview by a state-licensed socio-medically trained psychotherapist. Additionally, participants filled in a capacity-oriented self-rating questionnaire on their work demands. For discriminant validity purposes, participants filled in the Short Questionnaire for Work Analysis, and a questionnaire on work-anxiety.Results show that different psychological work capacity demands are reported in different professional groups. The work capacity demands self-rating is able to differentiate capacity demands in different professional fields. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Recht & Psychiatrie is the property of Psychiatrie Verlag GmbH and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Recht & Psychiatrie is the property of Psychiatrie Verlag GmbH and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie is the property of Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co. KG and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)