Search

OBJECTIVE Prospective associations between n-3 fatty acid biomarkers and type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk are not consistent in individual studies. We aimed to summarize the prospective associations of biomarkers of a-linolenic acid (ALA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosapentaenoic acid (DPA), and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) with T2D risk through an individual participant-level pooled analysis. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS For our analysis we incorporated data from a global consortium of 20 prospective studies from 14 countries. We included 65,147 participants who had blood measurements of ALA, EPA, DPA, or DHA and were free of diabetes at baseline. De novo harmonized analyses were performed in each cohort following a prespecified protocol, and cohort-specific associations were pooled using inverse variance-weighted meta-analysis. RESULTS A total of 16,693 incident T2D cases were identified during follow-up (median follow-up ranging from 2.5 to 21.2 years). In pooled multivariable analysis, per interquintile range (difference between the 90th and 10th percentiles for each fatty acid), EPA, DPA, DHA, and their sum were associated with lower T2D incidence, with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs of 0.92 (0.87, 0.96), 0.79 (0.73, 0.85), 0.82 (0.76, 0.89), and 0.81 (0.75, 0.88), respectively (all P < 0.001). ALA was not associated with T2D (HR 0.97 [95% CI 0.92, 1.02]) per interquintile range. Associations were robust across prespecified subgroups as well as in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS Highercirculating biomarkers of seafood-derivedn-3 fattyacids, including EPA,DPA, DHA, and their sum, were associated with lower risk of T2D in a global consortium of prospective studies. The biomarker of plant-derived ALA was not significantly associated with T2D risk.Copyright © 2021 by the American Diabetes Association.

A combination of genetic and functional approaches has identified three independent breast cancer risk loci at 2q35. A recent fine-scale mapping analysis to refine these associations resulted in 1 (signal 1), 5 (signal 2), and 42 (signal 3) credible causal variants at these loci. We used publicly available in silico DNase I and ChIP-seq data with in vitro reporter gene and CRISPR assays to annotate signals 2 and 3. We identified putative regulatory elements that enhanced cell-type-specific transcription from the IGFBP5 promoter at both signals (30- to 40-fold increased expression by the putative regulatory element at signal 2, 2- to 3-fold by the putative regulatory element at signal 3). We further identified one of the five credible causal variants at signal 2, a 1.4 kb deletion (esv3594306), as the likely causal variant; the deletion allele of this variant was associated with an average additional increase in IGFBP5 expression of 1.3-fold (MCF-7) and 2.2-fold (T-47D). We propose a model in which the deletion allele of esv3594306 juxtaposes two transcription factor binding regions (annotated by estrogen receptor alpha ChIP-seq peaks) to generate a single extended regulatory element. This regulatory element increases cell-type-specific expression of the tumor suppressor gene IGFBP5 and, thereby, reduces risk of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer (odds ratio = 0.77, 95% CI 0.74-0.81, p = 3.1 x 10-31).Copyright © 2021 The Authors

OBJECTIVE: Prospective associations between n-3 fatty acid biomarkers and type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk are not consistent in individual studies. We aimed to summarize the prospective associations of biomarkers of alpha-linolenic acid (ALA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosapentaenoic acid (DPA), and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) with T2D risk through an individual participant-level pooled analysis. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: For our analysis we incorporated data from a global consortium of 20 prospective studies from 14 countries. We included 65,147 participants who had blood measurements of ALA, EPA, DPA, or DHA and were free of diabetes at baseline. De novo harmonized analyses were performed in each cohort following a prespecified protocol, and cohort-specific associations were pooled using inverse variance-weighted meta-analysis. RESULT(S): A total of 16,693 incident T2D cases were identified during follow-up (median follow-up ranging from 2.5 to 21.2 years). In pooled multivariable analysis, per interquintile range (difference between the 90th and 10th percentiles for each fatty acid), EPA, DPA, DHA, and their sum were associated with lower T2D incidence, with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs of 0.92 (0.87, 0.96), 0.79 (0.73, 0.85), 0.82 (0.76, 0.89), and 0.81 (0.75, 0.88), respectively (all P < 0.001). ALA was not associated with T2D (HR 0.97 [95% CI 0.92, 1.02]) per interquintile range. Associations were robust across prespecified subgroups as well as in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION(S): Higher circulating biomarkers of seafood-derived n-3 fatty acids, including EPA, DPA, DHA, and their sum, were associated with lower risk of T2D in a global consortium of prospective studies. The biomarker of plant-derived ALA was not significantly associated with T2D risk.Copyright © 2021 by the American Diabetes Association.

There is a reproducibility crisis in scientific studies. Some of these crises arise from incorrect application of statistical tests to data that follow inappropriate distributions, have inconsistent equivariance, or have very small sample sizes. As determining which test is most appropriate for all data in a multi-categorical study (such as comparing taxa between sites in microbiome studies), we present statsSuma, an interactive Python notebook (which can be run from any desktop computer using the Google Colaboratory web service) and does not require a user to have any programming experience. This software assesses underlying data structures in a given dataset to advise what pairwise or listwise statistical procedure would be best suited for all data. As some users may be interested in further mining specific trends, statSuma performs 5 different two-tailed pairwise tests (Student’s t-test, Welch’s t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, Brunner-Munzel test, and a pairwise Kruskal-Wallis H-test) and advises the best test for each comparison. This software also advises whether ANOVA or a multi-categorical Kruskal-Wallis H-test is most appropriate for a given dataset and performs both procedures. A data distribution-vs-Gaussian distribution plot is produced for each taxon at each site and a variance plot between all combinations of 2 taxa at each site are produced so Gaussian tests and variance tests can be visually confirmed alongside associated statistical determinants.

Isolation Forests is an unsupervised machine learning technique for detecting outliers in continuous datasets that does not require an underlying equivariant or Gaussian distribution and is suitable for use on small datasets. While this procedure is widely used across quantitative fields, to our knowledge, this is the first attempt to solely assess its use for microbiome datasets. Here we present uniForest, an interactive Python notebook (which can be run from any desktop computer using the Google Colaboratory web service) for the processing of microbiome outliers. We used uniForest to apply Isolation Forests to the Healthy Human Microbiome project dataset and imputed outliers with the mean of the remaining inliers to maintain sample size and assessed its prowess in variance reduction in both community structure and derived ecological statistics (-diversity). We also assessed its functionality in anatomical site made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.17.444491; this version posted May 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint 2 differentiation (pre- and postprocessing) using principal component analysis, dissimilarity matrices, and ANOSIM. We observed a minimum variance reduction of 81.17% across the entire dataset and in alpha diversity at the Phylum level. Application of Isolation Forests also separated the dataset to an extremely high specificity, reducing variance within taxa samples by a minimum of 81.33%. It is evident that Isolation Forests are a potent tool in restricting the effect of variance in microbiome analysis and has potential for broad application in studies where high levels of microbiome variance is expected. This software allows for clean analyses of otherwise noisy datasets.

We propose that biases in attitude and stereotype formation might arise as a result of learned differences in the extent to which social groups have previously been predictive of behavioral or physical properties. Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrate that differences in the experienced predictiveness of groups with respect to evaluatively neutral information influence the extent to which participants later form attitudes and stereotypes about those groups. In contrast, Experiment 3 shows no influence of predictiveness when using a procedure designed to emphasize the use of higher level reasoning processes, a finding consistent with the idea that the root of the predictiveness bias is not in reasoning. Experiments 4 and 5 demonstrate that the predictiveness bias in formation of group beliefs does not depend on participants making global evaluations of groups. These results are discussed in relation to the associative mechanisms proposed by Mackintosh (1975) to explain similar phenomena in animal conditioning and associative learning.