Search

• Enfortumab vedotin/pembrolizumab shows highest overall survival (HR 0.47, 95% CrI: 0.38–0.58). • Avelumab monotherapy significantly improves survival (HR 0.69, 95% CrI: 0.56–0.86). • Combination therapy enfortumab/pembrolizumab enhances progression-free survival (HR 0.45, 95% CrI: 0.38–0.54). • Avelumab monotherapy exhibits highest odds of overall response rate. • PD-L1 positive and negative patients both might benefit from the analyzed therapies. Metastatic urothelial carcinoma (muC) has historically had few effective therapeutic options. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), were introduced as therapeutic options for cisplatin-ineligible patients, however, direct head-to-head trials comparing these treatments are lacking. To address this gap, this study employs a Bayesian framework to indirectly compare the performance of ICIs as first-line agents for muC. A systematic review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating different ICI for mUC. Data was inputted into Review Manager 5.4 for pairwise meta-analysis. Data was then used to build a network in R Studio. These networks were used to model 200,000 Markov Chains via MonteCarlo sampling. The results are expressed as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). Six studies with 5,449 patients were included, 3,255 received ICI monotherapy or combination. Moreover, a total of 3,006 had PD-L1 positive tumors and 2,362 were PD-L1 negative. Median overall survival (OS) ranged from 12.1 to 31.5 months across the studies, with the combination of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab demonstrating the most substantial reduction in the risk of death (HR 0.47 [95% CrI: 0.38, 0.58]), followed by avelumab monotherapy (HR 0.69 [95% CrI: 0.56, 0.86]). The limitations of this network meta-analysis include variability in study follow-up duration, lack of standardized methods for assessing PD-L1 positivity, and potential bias introduced by control arms with poorer survival outcomes across included trials. The enfortumab vedotin/pembrolizumab combination significantly improved survival and response rates. Avelumab showed notable single-agent activity. These findings provide a valuable framework to guide clinical decision-making and highlight priority areas for future research, including biomarker refinement and novel combination strategies to enhance antitumor immunity in this challenging malignancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Currently, there are no guidelines for the management of locally advanced unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) from an Indian perspective. There is a lack of consensus on the utility of treatment options in firstline (1L) and second-line (2L) settings, especially in cisplatin- and platinum-unfit mUC patient subgroups. Objective This articles aims to develop evidence-based practical consensus recommendations for the management of mUC in Indian settings. Methods Modified Delphi consensus methodology was considered to arrive at a consensus. An expert scientific committee of 15 medical oncologists from India constituted the panel. Twelve clinically relevant questions were grouped into five categories for presentation and discussion: (1) cisplatin and platinum ineligibility criteria; (2) programmed death ligand 1 and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) testing in mUC patients; (3) treatment options in 1L settings; (4) role of switch maintenance; and (5) treatment options in 2L. Statements that reached high (- 80%) and moderate (60-79%) levels of consensus in the first round (electronic survey) did not undergo the second Delphi round. The questions that received a low level of consensus (< 60%) were discussed during the virtual meeting. Results Renal impairment (creatinine clearance [CrCl]<60mL/min) and New York Heart Association class 3 heart failure are important assessment criteria for determining cisplatin ineligibility. Patients are unfit for any platinum-based chemotherapy in case of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status> 3 or severe renal impairment (CrCl<30 mL/min). Gemcitabine and platinum with cisplatin over carboplatin were preferred in 1L settings. In patients unfit for cisplatin-based regimens, carboplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy was preferred over immunotherapy (atezolizumab or pembrolizumab). Selected patients who are platinum ineligible may be considered for immunotherapy. Post-induction chemotherapy, those who do not progress may be strongly considered for avelumab maintenance. Experts recommended erdafitinib in FGFR-positive mUC patients in 2L settings. In FGFR-negative patients, immunotherapy (pembrolizumab, nivolumab, or avelumab)may be preferred over chemotherapy (paclitaxel, docetaxel, or vinflunine). Enfortumab vedotin and sacituzumab govitecan may be considered for further lines of therapy. Conclusion Expert panel consensus will offer expert guidance to oncologists/clinicians on the management of mUC in Indian settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In the THOR trial (NCT03390504) Cohort 1, erdafitinib demonstrated significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) (median 12.1 versus 7.8 months) and reduced risk of death by 36% (hazard ratio 0.64, P = 0.005) compared with chemotherapy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) patients with FGFR alterations who progressed after ≥ 1 prior treatments, including anti-PD-(L)1. There have been no reports of the Japanese subgroup results yet. Methods: THOR Cohort 1 randomized patients to erdafitinib once daily or docetaxel/vinflunine once every 3 weeks. Primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). No specific statistical power was set for this Japanese subgroup analysis. Results: Of 266 patients randomized, 27 (14 erdafitinib; 13 chemotherapy) were Japanese. Baseline characteristics were generally similar between treatments and to the overall population, except for more males, lower body weight, and more upper tract primary tumors among Japanese patients. Compared with chemotherapy, erdafitinib showed improved OS (median 25.4 versus 12.4 months), PFS (median 8.4 versus 2.9 months) and ORR (57.1% versus 15.4%). Any grade treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in all patients from both arms but Grade 3/4 AEs and AEs leading to discontinuation were lower in the erdafitinib arm. No new safety signals were observed in the Japanese subgroup. Conclusion: In the Japanese subgroup, erdafitinib showed improved survival and response compared to chemotherapy, with no new safety concerns. These results support erdafitinib as a treatment option for Japanese mUC patients with FGFR alterations, and early FGFR testing after diagnosis of mUC should be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Methods Results Conclusion Loss of heterozygosity in chromosome 9p21, common in urothelial carcinoma (UC), typically involves deletion of CDKN2A and MTAP genes. MTAP loss is emerging as a promising therapeutic target and predictive biomarker in UC. This single‐centrre retrospective study examined the incidence of CDKN2A deletions and MTAP loss in muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), investigating their correlations with clinical, pathological, and genomic features, as well as patient outcomes.Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were performed on 302 MIBC specimens and 63 biopsy‐proven metachronous urothelial metastases to assess CDKN2A deletions and MTAP protein expression.CDKN2A homozygous deletion (HD), identified in 30.3% of MIBCs, and MTAP loss, found in 28.8% of MIBCs, were both significantly associated with the luminal‐URO subtype, FGFR3 mutations, and normal/wildtype p53 IHC (P < 0.05). Loss of MTAP expression was significantly correlated with CDKN2A HD, with 84.0% sensitivity, 92.3% negative predictive value (NPV), 96.3% specificity, and 91.9% positive predictive value (PPV). MTAP expression was 100% concordant between primary tumours and nodal metastases. Patients with MTAP loss had a higher incidence of visceral metastases (50%) compared to bone/soft tissue (35.7%) and nodes (14.3%). Mean progression‐free survival and overall survival were shorter for patients with MTAP loss, although not statistically significant.Our findings highlight CDKN2A HD and MTAP loss as prevalent genetic alterations in MIBC and mUC, particularly within the luminal‐URO subtype and FGFR3‐mutated, p53‐normal/wildtype tumours. MTAP IHC can serve as a surrogate marker for 9p21.3 HD, highlighting its clinical relevance and potential as a therapeutic target and predictive biomarker in MIBC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Few studies have reported on administering enfortumab vedotin to patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma and end‐stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis. Case presentation Case 1: An 85‐year‐old man underwent hemodialysis for progressive renal failure 4 months after right laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy. Case 2: A 73‐year‐old man underwent hemodialysis after two laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomies for recurrent urothelial carcinoma. In both cases, enfortumab vedotin was administered due to postoperative recurrence and progression despite platinum‐based chemotherapy and pembrolizumab. Partial response and disease progression were observed in cases 1 and 2, respectively. Adverse events included a mild skin rash in both patients and neutropenia in Case 1, both of which resolved with symptomatic treatment. Conclusion The efficacy and safety of enfortumab vedotin in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma, and end‐stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis, were confirmed.

Objective: To compare in a phase III trial the efficacy and safety of nanoparticle albumin‐bound (nab)‐paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (GA) with that of carboplatin plus gemcitabine (GCb) as a first‐line treatment for patients with cisplatin‐ineligible metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC). Patients and Methods: Treatment‐naive, cisplatin‐ineligible patients with mUC were assigned randomly to either the GA (both nab‐paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8, every 21 days) or GCb group (carboplatin area under the free carboplatin plasma concentration versus time curve of 4.5 on Day 1, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8, every 21 days). The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), safety, and patient‐reported outcomes (PROs). Results: The trial was terminated early because of slow accrual after 54 patients were enrolled: 26 in in the GA group and 28 in the GCb groups. The median PFS was 6.7 vs 5.9 months for the GA and GCb groups, respectively (P = 0.248). The median OS time was 12.1 vs 10.7 months for the GA and GCb groups, respectively (P = 0.837). The ORR and DCR were 40% vs 46.4% (P = 0.637) and 72% vs 68% (P = 0.188) in the GA and GCb groups, respectively. Patients treated with GA showed significantly lower incidence of Grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia and does reduction and delay. Although peripheral sensory neuropathy was higher in the GA arm, no Grade 3 neuropathy occurred. There was no difference in the PROs between the two groups. Conclusion: While not powered for comparison, first‐line GA showed similar efficacy and better tolerability and might be considered a rational alternative to GCb. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: This study assessed real-world treatment in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) in Germany. Materials & methods: Patients diagnosed with mUC from 2015 to 2019 were identified in two claims databases: AOK PLUS and GWQ. Results: 3226 patients with mUC were analyzed; 1286 (39.9%) received systemic treatment within 12 months of diagnosis (platinum-based chemotherapy: 64.2%). Factors associated with receiving treatment were: younger age, male sex, less comorbidity and recent diagnosis. In AOK PLUS and GWQ populations, unadjusted median overall survival (interquartile range) from diagnosis in treated patients was 13.7 (6.8–32.9) and 13.8 (7.1–41.7) months, and in untreated patients was 3.0 (1.2–10.8) and 3.6 (1.2–18.8) months, respectively. Conclusion: A significant proportion of patients with mUC in Germany receive no systemic treatment. Plain language summary What is this article about? This article reports the results from a study in Germany between 2015 and 2019 that investigated how advanced bladder cancer that has spread to other organs was treated and how long people lived after diagnosis. The study looked at systemic therapies, which means treatments that affect the entire body. What were the results? Only 40% of people diagnosed with advanced bladder cancer received systemic treatment within the first 12 months. Of those who did receive systemic treatment, the majority received combination therapy that included a chemotherapy drug containing platinum (64%). Systemic treatment was more likely to be given to people who were younger, less sick, male, or more recently diagnosed. After 12 months, 56% of treated people were still alive, compared with 26% of people without treatment. On average, people who received systemic treatment lived for about 14 months, while people without systemic treatment lived for only 3 to 4 months. What do the results of the study mean? Many people with advanced bladder cancer in Germany do not receive systemic treatment. People who receive treatment are likely to live longer than those who do not receive treatment. This study sought to explore real-world treatment rates, treatment patterns, and outcomes in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) in Germany. Patients in Germany with an incident mUC diagnosis from 2015 to 2019 were identified in two claims databases (AOK PLUS and GWQ) covering ≈8 million patients. Of 3226 patients with mUC identified, 1892 (58.6%) did not receive systemic treatment, 1286 (39.9%) received systemic treatment within the first 12 months after diagnosis and 48 (1.5%) received systemic treatment ≥12 months after diagnosis. Among treated patients, 825 (64.2%) received platinum-based chemotherapy, 322 (25.0%) received non-platinum chemotherapy, and 139 (10.8%) received immunotherapy. Factors associated with a higher likelihood of receiving systemic treatment within 12 months included younger age, lower comorbidity score, more recent diagnosis and male sex. The probability of survival at 12 months after diagnosis in the treated and untreated cohorts was 56.1 and 26.1%. The probability of survival at 12 months after diagnosis for patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy, non-platinum chemotherapy, or immunotherapy was 60.4, 49.4 and 46.8%, respectively. Unadjusted median OS from diagnosis in the AOK PLUS and GWQ populations in treated patients was 13.7 (interquartile range [IQR], 6.8–32.9) and 13.8 months (IQR, 7.1–41.7) months, and in untreated patients was 3.0 (IQR, 1.2–10.8) months and 3.6 months (IQR, 1.2–18.8), respectively. These findings suggest that a substantial proportion of patients with mUC in Germany remained undertreated during the study period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: In December 2021, enfortumab vedotin (EV), an antibody‐drug conjugate directed against nectin‐4, was approved in Japan as a new treatment after platinum‐containing chemotherapy and PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors. This study evaluated, using real‐world data, the efficacy and safety of EV therapy in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Materials and methods: Fifty‐five patients with mUC who discontinued pembrolizumab therapy due to disease progression between June 2018 and April 2023 at Yokohama City University Hospital were evaluated retrospectively. Of the 55 patients, 25 received EV therapy (EV group) and 30 did not (non‐EV group). All patients who underwent EV therapy were diagnosed with disease progression after the approval of EV in Japan. Results: The median (range) follow‐up period after pembrolizumab discontinuation was 6.3 (0.7–31.1) months. There were eight (32.0%) deaths due to cancer in the EV group and 27 (90.0%) in the non‐EV group. The overall survival (OS) after pembrolizumab discontinuation was not reached in the EV group versus 2.6 months in the non‐EV group (p < 0.001). A multivariate analysis revealed that EV therapy (EV vs. non‐EV group; hazard ratio 0.26; 95% confidence interval 0.16–0.41; p < 0.001) was an independent prognostic factor for OS. Conclusion: EV prolonged OS in mUC following pembrolizumab therapy in real‐world data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Metastatic bladder carcinoma is a cancer with a poor prognosis, for which treatments have remained the same for several decades. Immunotherapy has revolutionized the management of several solid cancers, significantly improving the prognosis of some patients. Several protocols have been evaluated this treatment in bladder cancer, in first or second line, with conflicting results. However, two recent studies evaluating immunotherapy either with cisplatin-based chemotherapy or with enfortumab vedotin, an antibody-drug conjugated (ADC), have demonstrated their benefits in terms of overall survival as a first-line treatment, thus redefining the standard of care for patients. Immunotherapy is also being evaluated in the peri-operative setting, with encouraging results for patients with localized or locally advanced bladder cancer. In the past decade, the therapeutic arsenal for metastatic bladder cancer has expanded considerably, with the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), antibody–drug conjugates such as enfortumab vedotin, and anti-fibroblast growth factor receptor agents. Clinical trials evaluating ICIs as neoadjuvants, adjuvants, or first- or second-line treatments have produced conflicting results. However, first-line therapeutic strategies have been redefined by the recent publication of results from two clinical trials: CheckMate-901, which demonstrated the superiority of combined treatment with nivolumab and chemotherapy in extending overall survival, and EV-302, which demonstrated that combined treatment with pembrolizumab and enfortumab vedotin reduced the risk of death by 53%. In this review, we discuss the role of ICIs, alone or in combination, in bladder cancer management in the metastatic and adjuvant settings in 2024, considering the latest published trials. The potential role of ICIs as neoadjuvants is also discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is the 10th most common cancer globally with an almost 4 times higher prevalence in men. The main risk factors for development of urothelial carcinoma are advanced age, smoking, arsenic contamination, exposure to carcinogens. Metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) has overall poor prognosis with a 5-year overall survival rate of only < 5%. The standard of care comprises of platinum-based chemotherapy, but the responses are often not sustained. A working group was established with an objective to discuss the most recent clinical data on the genitourinary tumors of interest and comprised of experts across Latin America, Emerging Asia (except China, Japan, and South Korea), Africa, and the Middle East (known as Emerging Markets or EM). There is an evident disparity in terms of uneven mortality and incidence rate distribution among various regions. There is a lack and/or insufficient data on epidemiology, treatment, and outcomes in the EM. The lack of registries impacts the healthcare decisions and the lower incidence from the region might not be reflective of the true disease burden. The treatment outcomes of mUC can be improved by understanding the current disease burden and treatment approach of mUC and identifying the gaps and challenges associated with management. Hence, a literature review was developed to summarize the current disease burden and treatment approach of mUC across EM. The review also highlights the unmet needs for mUC management in EM and suggests a way forward to improve the current situation in order to better serve the patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Despite the prospective randomized controlled JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial, no real-world evidence exists regarding tumor characteristics, adverse events (AEs), and survival of avelumab maintenance (AVM)-treated patients with partial/complete response or stable disease after previous platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Methods: We relied on our institutional database to identify mUC patients who received AVM between January, 2021 and December, 2023. The main outcomes consisted of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and were computed by Kaplan-Meier estimates. Stratification was performed according to programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status. Results: Overall, 24 AVM patients were identified at a median age of 71 (interquartile range [IQR]: 67–76) years, of which 67% were males. Of these, 63%, 21%, and 17% received AVM therapy for bladder cancer and upper tract urothelial carcinoma or both, respectively. PD-L1 status was positive in 45% of patients. During AVM treatment, AEs were observed in 33% of patients; however, they were limited to ≤2 grade AEs. At a median follow-up of eight (IQR 4–20) months, 71% of patients had progressed under AVM with median PFS of 6.2 months (confidence interval [CI]: 3.2–18.2). Median OS was 13.4 (CI: 6.9 – not reached [NR]) months. One-year OS after AVM was 52%. In PD-L1-positive patients, median PFS and OS were 6.4 (CI: 2.7 – NR) months and 13.4 (CI: 7.7 months – NR), respectively. Conclusion: AVM is associated with moderate AE rates. Despite similarities in baseline characteristics compared to trial-selected JAVELIN Bladder 100 mUC patients, AVM resulted in longer/similar PFS but significantly shorter OS in real-world setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a Trop-2-directed antibody–drug conjugate containing cytotoxic SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan. SG received accelerated US Food and Drug Administration approval for locally advanced (LA) or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and a checkpoint inhibitor, based on cohort 1 of the TROPHY-U-01 study. Mutations in the uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) gene are associated with increased adverse events (AEs) with irinotecan-based therapies. Whether UGT1A1 status could impact SG toxicity and efficacy remains unclear. TROPHY-U-01 (NCT03547973) is a multicohort, open-label, phase II registrational study. Cohort 1 includes patients with LA or mUC who progressed after platinum- and checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies. SG was administered at 10 mg/kg intravenously on days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per central review; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Post hoc safety analyses were exploratory with descriptive statistics. Updated analyses include longer follow-up. Cohort 1 included 113 patients. At a median follow-up of 10.5 months, ORR was 28% (95% CI 20.2% to 37.6%). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.4 months (95% CI 3.5-6.9 months) and 10.9 months (95% CI 8.9-13.8 months), respectively. Occurrence of grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs and treatment-related discontinuation were consistent with prior reports. UGT1A1 status was wildtype (∗1|∗1) in 40%, heterozygous (∗1|∗28) in 42%, homozygous (∗28|∗28) in 12%, and missing in 6% of patients. In patients with ∗1|∗1, ∗1|∗28, and ∗28|∗28 genotypes, any grade treatment-related AEs occurred in 93%, 94%, and 100% of patients, respectively, and were managed similarly regardless of UGT1A1 status. With longer follow-up, the ORR remains high in patients with heavily pretreated LA or mUC. Safety data were consistent with the known SG toxicity profile. AE incidence varied across UGT1A1 subgroups; however, discontinuation rates remained relatively low for all groups. • With longer follow-up, response rate remains high (28%) in patients with advanced UC treated with sacituzumab govitecan. • Safety profile of sacituzumab govitecan was tolerable with low treatment discontinuation rates (7%). • Although incidence and grade of AEs varied across subgroups, AEs were managed similarly regardless of the UGT1A1 status. • UGT1A1 testing before SG initiation is not currently recommended in advanced UC as patients are closely monitored for AEs. • Other cohorts of the TROPHY-U-01 and TROPiCS-04 trials will continue to inform the impact of UGT1A1 status on safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It is not known whether molecular urothelial cancer (UC) subtypes change during metastatic evolution. Immunohistochemistry-based and histomorphological UC subtypes remain highly stable during metastasis. The luminal tumor cell differentiation of "stroma-rich" tumors based on immunohistochemical subtyping is apparently superimposed by desmoplastic tumor stroma content in transcriptome-based subtyping. Urothelial cancer (UC) care is moving toward precision oncology. For tumor biology–driven treatment of metastatic UC (mUC), molecular subtypes play a crucial role. However, it is not known whether subtypes change during metastatic evolution. To address this, we analyzed a UC progression cohort (N = 154 patients) with 138 matched primary tumors (PRIM) and synchronous or metachronous distant metastasis (MET) by immunohistochemistry, and mRNA sequencing in a subgroup of 20 matched pairs. Protein-based tumor cell subtypes and histomorphology remained stable during metastatic progression (concordance: 94%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 88–97%). In comparison, transcriptome-based molecular consensus subtypes exhibited higher heterogeneity between PRIM and MET (concordance: 45%, 95% CI 23–69%), with switches particularly occurring between luminal and stroma-rich tumors. Of note, all tumors classified as stroma rich showed luminal tumor cell differentiation. By an in-depth analysis, we found a negative correlation of luminal gene and protein expression with increasing desmoplastic stroma content, suggesting that luminal tumor cell differentiation of "stroma-rich tumors" is superimposed by gene expression signals stemming from the stromal compartment. Immunohistochemistry allows tumor cell subtyping into luminal, basal, or neuroendocrine classes that remain stable during metastatic progression. These findings expand our biological understanding of UC MET and have implications for future subtype-stratified clinical trials in patients with mUC. Urothelial carcinomas (UCs) occur in different appearances, the so-called molecular subtypes. These molecular subtypes will gain importance for the therapy of metastatic UCs in the future. We could demonstrate that the subtype remains stable during metastasis, which is highly relevant for future studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Subtype of urothelial carcinoma (SUC), defined here as urothelial carcinoma with any histologic subtype or divergent differentiation, is a clinically aggressive disease. However, the efficacy of enfortumab vedotin (EV) against SUC remains unclear. Hence, this study aimed to assess the oncological outcomes of patients with SUC treated with EV for metastatic disease. We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients with advanced lower and upper urinary tract cancer who received EV after platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade therapy at six institutions. The objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients with pure urothelial carcinoma (PUC) and those with SUC. We identified 44 and 18 patients with PUC and SUC, respectively. Squamous differentiation was the most common subtype element, followed by glandular differentiation and sarcomatoid subtype. Although patients with SUC had a comparable ORR to those with PUC, the duration of response for SUC was short. Patients with SUC had poorer PFS than those with PUC; however, no significant difference was observed in OS. Multivariate analysis revealed that SUC was significantly associated with shorter PFS. Although the response of metastatic SUC to EV was similar to that of PUC, SUC showed faster progression than PUC.

This study presents the enfortumab vedotin (EV) treatment analysis at our institution. We retrospectively analyzed patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) treated with EV between January 2021 and October 2023. EV was administered at 1.25 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15 in a 28-day cycle. Whole-body computed tomography scans were performed to assess the treatment response. Patient characteristics, treatment histories, response rates, progression-free survival, and adverse events were evaluated. Response rates were determined, and adverse events were recorded. Among the 20 patients, 70% were male and 65% had bladder tumors. Most patients had lung (65%) or lymph node (65%) metastases. The median follow-up was 11.2 months, with 45% of the patients succumbing to the disease. The overall response rate was 55%. The median progression-free and median overall survivals were 10.5 and 12.9 months, respectively. Severe adverse events occurred in 35% of patients. In this real-world study, EV demonstrated promising efficacy and manageable safety profiles in Japanese patients with mUC. The study’s results were consistent with previous clinical trials, although a longer follow-up was required. Our findings support EV use as a treatment option for patients with mUC who exhibit disease progression after platinum-based chemotherapy and immune-checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Abstract Introduction Previous RC48 (Disitamab Vedotin) studies established that the safety and efficacy of RC48‐antibody–drug conjugate (ADC), either alone or combined with toripalimab, for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) patients exhibiting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐positive or even HER2‐negative status after standard chemotherapy failure. Methods With locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC), patients who received RC48‐ADC monotherapy or a combination with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD‐1) inhibitors between August 2021 and October 2022 were enrolled in this retrospective observational study to evaluate the real‐world antitumor effectiveness and safety. Results Among the 38 enrolled patients (29 males; median age 67.5 years [38–93]), 8 received RC48‐ADC monotherapy, while 30 received combination therapy. Initially, 63.2% (24/38) of the patients had received ≥1 line of prior treatment, and 63.2% (24/38) had visceral metastasis. UC of the bladder represented the majority type in 68.4% (26/38) of cases. By the data cutoff in March 2023, the overall objective response rate (ORR) was 63.2% (95% CI, 47.1%–79.2%), with a disease control rate (DCR) of 89.5% (95% CI, 79.3%–99.7%). Median follow‐up time was 10.6 months. The median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.9–10.5), with a 6‐month PFS rate of 63.2% and a 12‐month PFS rate of 34.1%. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached, with a 12‐month OS rate of 76.7%. The median duration of response was 7.3 months (95% CI, 4.6–10.0) among 24 patients evaluated as partial response (PR). The most common treatment‐related adverse events (TRAEs) included anemia (71.1%), anorexia (57.9%), asthenia (52.6%), hypoesthesia (52.6%), bone marrow suppression (47.4%), alopecia (47.4%), nausea (44.7%), proteinuria (36.8%), vomiting (34.2%), and hypoalbuminemia (31.6%). No patient experienced TRAEs of Grade ≥3. One patient had an immune‐related adverse event (irAE) of rash related to toripalimab. Conclusions Both as monotherapy and in combination with PD‐1 inhibitors, RC48‐ADC exhibits promising effectiveness and manageable safety profile for mUC patients in real‐world settings.

Comprehensive analyses including both metachronous and synchronous metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma are limited. In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated oncologic outcomes and costs associated with management of metastatic upper tract disease using the SEER-Medicare database and evaluated quality of care in this space using a novel and easily applied metric. Less than half of patients met quality care criteria. Those that did meet criteria experienced longer overall survival at marginally increased costs. Background: Population-based studies evaluating outcomes for metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (mUTUC) are sparse and rarely capture both patients with de novo (synchronous) metastases and those who progress to metastatic disease (metachronous). Herein we evaluated the outcomes and costs associated with synchronous and metachronous mUTUC, utilizing a novel Methodology. Additionally, we created a guideline-based quality score to improve care in this space. Patients and Methods: We identified all patients with mUTUC aged 66 years and older included in the SEER-Medicare linked database between 2004 and 2012. Achievement of 3 quality cr iter ia was assessed: (1) cancer-specific survival (CSS) > 12 months; (2) receipt of systemic therapy; (3) receipt of hospice/palliative care. Total healthcare and out-of-pocket costs were evaluated. Regression analyses were performed to assess characteristics associated with quality criteria and total healthcare costs. Results: Of the 1223 patients identified, at least one quality cr iter ion was met in just 40.2% and only 54 patients (4.4%) received palliative care. In multivariable analysis, patients with synchronous mUTUC (OR:0.55, 95%CI:0.41-0.72), and at least 3 comorbidities (OR:0.68, 95%CI:0.47-0.98) were less likely to achieve at least 1 quality cr iter ion. Meeting at least 1 quality cr iter ion was associated with increased costs ($94,677, 95%CI:87,702-101,652 versus $63,575, 95%CI:59,598-67,552). Conclusions: Less than half of patients with mUTUC met at least 1 quality cr iter ion. Quality score achievement was associated with a modest increase in total healthcare spending. These findings not only provide guidance for future study of rare diseases using secondary data, but also highlight inadequacies in the current management of mUTUC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Subtype of urothelial carcinoma (SUC), defined here as urothelial carcinoma with any histologic subtype or divergent differentiation, is a clinically aggressive disease. However, the efficacy of enfortumab vedotin (EV) against SUC remains unclear. Hence, this study aimed to assess the oncological outcomes of patients with SUC treated with EV for metastatic disease. We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients with advanced lower and upper urinary tract cancer who received EV after platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade therapy at six institutions. The objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients with pure urothelial carcinoma (PUC) and those with SUC. We identified 44 and 18 patients with PUC and SUC, respectively. Squamous differentiation was the most common subtype element, followed by glandular differentiation and sarcomatoid subtype. Although patients with SUC had a comparable ORR to those with PUC, the duration of response for SUC was short. Patients with SUC had poorer PFS than those with PUC; however, no significant difference was observed in OS. Multivariate analysis revealed that SUC was significantly associated with shorter PFS. Although the response of metastatic SUC to EV was similar to that of PUC, SUC showed faster progression than PUC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study presents the enfortumab vedotin (EV) treatment analysis at our institution. We retrospectively analyzed patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) treated with EV between January 2021 and October 2023. EV was administered at 1.25 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15 in a 28-day cycle. Whole-body computed tomography scans were performed to assess the treatment response. Patient characteristics, treatment histories, response rates, progression-free survival, and adverse events were evaluated. Response rates were determined, and adverse events were recorded. Among the 20 patients, 70% were male and 65% had bladder tumors. Most patients had lung (65%) or lymph node (65%) metastases. The median follow-up was 11.2 months, with 45% of the patients succumbing to the disease. The overall response rate was 55%. The median progression-free and median overall survivals were 10.5 and 12.9 months, respectively. Severe adverse events occurred in 35% of patients. In this real-world study, EV demonstrated promising efficacy and manageable safety profiles in Japanese patients with mUC. The study's results were consistent with previous clinical trials, although a longer follow-up was required. Our findings support EV use as a treatment option for patients with mUC who exhibit disease progression after platinum-based chemotherapy and immune-checkpoint inhibitor therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) alterations are oncogenic drivers of urothelial carcinoma (UC). Pemigatinib is a selective, oral inhibitor of FGFR1-3 with antitumor activity. We report the efficacy and safety of pemigatinib in the open-label, single-arm, phase II study of previously treated, unresectable or metastatic UC with FGFR3 alterations (FIGHT-201; NCT02872714). Patients ≥18 years old with FGFR3 mutations or fusions/rearrangements (cohort A) and other FGF/FGFR alterations (cohort B) were included. Patients received pemigatinib 13.5 mg once daily continuously (CD) or intermittently (ID) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was centrally confirmed objective response rate (ORR) as per RECIST v1.1 in cohort A-CD. Secondary endpoints included ORR in cohorts A-ID and B, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Overall, 260 patients were enrolled and treated (A-CD, n = 101; A-ID, n = 103; B, n = 44; unconfirmed FGF/FGFR status, n = 12). All discontinued treatment, most commonly due to progressive disease (68.5%). ORR [95% confidence interval (CI)] in cohorts A-CD and A-ID was 17.8% (10.9% to 26.7%) and 23.3% (15.5% to 32.7%), respectively. Among patients with the most common FGFR3 mutation (S249C; n = 107), ORR was similar between cohorts (A-CD, 23.9%; A-ID, 24.6%). In cohorts A-CD/A-ID, median (95% CI) DOR was 6.2 (4.1-8.3)/6.2 (4.6-8.0) months, PFS was 4.0 (3.5-4.2)/4.3 (3.9-6.1) months, and OS was 6.8 (5.3-9.1)/8.9 (7.5-15.2) months. Pemigatinib had limited clinical activity among patients in cohort B. Of 36 patients with samples available at progression, 6 patients had 8 acquired FGFR3 secondary resistance mutations (V555M/L, n = 3; V553M, n = 1; N540K/S, n = 2; M528I, n = 2). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events overall were diarrhea (44.6%) and alopecia, stomatitis, and hyperphosphatemia (42.7% each). Pemigatinib was generally well tolerated and demonstrated clinical activity in previously treated, unresectable or metastatic UC with FGFR3 mutations or fusions/rearrangements. • Pemigatinib was evaluated in metastatic UC with FGFR3 mutations/rearrangements and other FGF / FGFR alterations. • Objective response in patients with FGFR3 mutations/rearrangements was 18% (continuous) and 23% (intermittent dosing). • Limited clinical activity was observed in patients whose tumors harbored other FGF/FGFR alterations. • FGFR3 S249C mutations (52.5%) were the most common FGFR3 alterations, and PI3K pathway co-alterations predicted nonresponse. • Continuous and intermittent dosing of pemigatinib had clinical activity in metastatic FGFR3- altered UC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This retrospective real-world study shows that vinflunine and platinum-combinations were the most common regimens after previous pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC). The median progression-free and overall survival were 3.3 and 7.7 months respectively. Conventional chemotherapy after immunotherapy may remain to be a late-stage treatment option for selected patients in the era of targeted precision medicine of mUC. Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been established as a routine treatment in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC). However, there has been no standard of care after progression on ICIs. We investigated real-world treatment patterns and efficacy of chemotherapy (CHT) after pembrolizumab, in the era before introduction of maintenance avelumab and antibody-drug conjugates (ADC). Patients and Methods: An observational, retrospective study was conducted at twelve Nordic centers. Patients with mUC were treated according to investigator 's choice of CHT after pembrolizumab. Primary endpoint was overall response (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR); secondary endpoints were progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: In total, 102 patients were included whereof 23 patients received CHT after pembrolizumab as second line treatment (subcohort A) and 79 patients in third line (subcohort B). Platinum-gemcitabine combinations were the most common regimens in subcohort A, and vinflunine in subcohort B. The ORR and DCR were 36% and 47%, respectively. Presence of liver metastases was independently associated with lower ORR and DCR. The PFS and OS were 3.3 months and 7.7 months, respectively. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) and number of previous cycles of pembrolizumab were found to be independent prognostic factors associated with OS. Conclusion: In a real-world setting, CHT showed clinically meaningful response rates and survival in mUC patients after progression with pembrolizumab. Clinical benefit may pr imar ily be achieved in patients with favorable ECOG PS, in patients treated with > 6 cycles pembrolizumab as well as in patients without presence of liver metastases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Previous RC48 (Disitamab Vedotin) studies established that the safety and efficacy of RC48‐antibody–drug conjugate (ADC), either alone or combined with toripalimab, for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) patients exhibiting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐positive or even HER2‐negative status after standard chemotherapy failure. Methods: With locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC), patients who received RC48‐ADC monotherapy or a combination with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD‐1) inhibitors between August 2021 and October 2022 were enrolled in this retrospective observational study to evaluate the real‐world antitumor effectiveness and safety. Results: Among the 38 enrolled patients (29 males; median age 67.5 years [38–93]), 8 received RC48‐ADC monotherapy, while 30 received combination therapy. Initially, 63.2% (24/38) of the patients had received ≥1 line of prior treatment, and 63.2% (24/38) had visceral metastasis. UC of the bladder represented the majority type in 68.4% (26/38) of cases. By the data cutoff in March 2023, the overall objective response rate (ORR) was 63.2% (95% CI, 47.1%–79.2%), with a disease control rate (DCR) of 89.5% (95% CI, 79.3%–99.7%). Median follow‐up time was 10.6 months. The median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.9–10.5), with a 6‐month PFS rate of 63.2% and a 12‐month PFS rate of 34.1%. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached, with a 12‐month OS rate of 76.7%. The median duration of response was 7.3 months (95% CI, 4.6–10.0) among 24 patients evaluated as partial response (PR). The most common treatment‐related adverse events (TRAEs) included anemia (71.1%), anorexia (57.9%), asthenia (52.6%), hypoesthesia (52.6%), bone marrow suppression (47.4%), alopecia (47.4%), nausea (44.7%), proteinuria (36.8%), vomiting (34.2%), and hypoalbuminemia (31.6%). No patient experienced TRAEs of Grade ≥3. One patient had an immune‐related adverse event (irAE) of rash related to toripalimab. Conclusions: Both as monotherapy and in combination with PD‐1 inhibitors, RC48‐ADC exhibits promising effectiveness and manageable safety profile for mUC patients in real‐world settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Data describing real-world treatment patterns in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) in Central-Eastern Europe are scarce, and data from Hungary have not been published. This retrospective, nationwide, real-world study investigated patient characteristics, treatment patterns, comorbidities, and clinical outcomes in patients with mUC in Hungary. Methods: Adults diagnosed with mUC from January 2016 through June 2021 were identified using the National Health Insurance Fund Administration database. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: In total, 2523 patients with mUC were identified. Median follow-up was 7.1 months. Overall, 50% of patients received an identified systemic anticancer treatment; within this subgroup, first-line treatment was platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) in 86%, non-PBC in 8%, and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in 6%. The proportion of patients receiving treatment increased from 41% in 2016 to 59% in 2020, driven by increased use of first-line PBC or first-line ICI treatment. Comorbidities were more common in patients receiving first-line ICI treatment vs PBC or non-PBC and in patients receiving carboplatin + gemcitabine vs cisplatin + gemcitabine. Overall, only 24% received a second-line treatment. Unadjusted median OS from the start of first-line treatment in the PBC, non-PBC, and ICI subgroups was 12.8, 7.5, and 6.3 months, respectively. Median OS from date of diagnosis in untreated patients was 7.8 months. OS comparisons adjusted for differences in baseline characteristics between subgroups could not be performed. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess treatment patterns in patients with mUC in clinical practice in Hungary, using the national health insurance database. Rates of first- and second-line treatment were consistent with those observed in other countries. Avelumab first-line maintenance treatment became available for reimbursement in Hungary in late 2022, after the study period. Given the evolving landscape of reimbursed treatments in Hungary, further analyses are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Metastatic urothelial carcinoma （mUC） yields poor prognosis and is difficult to treat. Immunotherapy strategies have developed rapidly in recent years， and clinical prognosis of mUC patients has been significantly improved. However， immune checkpoint inhibitors （ICIs） alone have limited efficacy， and some ICIs monotherapy indications for mUC have also been withdrawn in recent years. Therefore， combined therapy based on ICIs has become a research hotspot in the treatment of mUC. At present， multiple clinical studies of ICIs combined with chemotherapy， antibody-drug conjugates， and dual immunotherapy for multiple lines of treatment of mUC have proved that combined therapy possesses promising development prospect. In this article， latest progress in ICI-based combined treatment for mUC was reviewed， aiming to provide reference for clinicians.

Abstract Background While the treatment guidelines have been established for pure urothelial carcinoma (pUC), patients with variant type urothelial carcinoma (vUC) face limited effective treatment options. The effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with vUC remains uncertain and necessitates additional research. Method We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study to explore the effectiveness of ICI in patients with pUC or vUC in Taiwan. We evaluated the overall response rate (ORR) through univariate logistic regression analysis and examined the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Additionally, we employed univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models to analyze the data. Result A total of 142 patients (116 pUC, 26 vUC) were included in our final analysis. The ORR was marginally higher in patients with pUC compared to those with vUC (34.5% vs. 23.1%, p = 0.26). Among all patients, 12.9% with pUC achieved a complete response (CR) after ICI treatment, while no vUC cases achieved CR (p = 0.05). There were no significant differences in PFS (median 3.6 months vs. 4.1 months, p = 0.34) or OS (median 16.3 months vs. 11.0 months, p = 0.24) when comparing patients with pUC or vUC. In the subgroup analysis, patients with pUC who underwent first-line ICI treatment exhibited significantly improved OS compared to those with vUC (24.6 months vs. 9.1 months, p = 0.004). Conclusion The use of ICI as monotherapy is a feasible and effective treatment approach for patients with metastatic vUC.

Abstract Introduction Clinical trials investigating efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) revealed sex-specific divergent outcomes in urothelial cancer (UC), suggesting that sex hormones might play an important role in gender-specific dimorphisms of response upon ICI. However, further clinical investigations are still needed to understand the influence of sex hormones in UC. The aim of this study was to get further insights on the prognostic and predictive value of sex hormone levels in patients with metastatic UC (mUC) who underwent ICI. Material and methods Sex hormone levels of patients with mUC including luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), LH/FSH ratio, prolactin, testosterone and 17β-estradiol (E2) were evaluated at baseline and during ICI at 6/8 weeks and 12/14 weeks. Results Twenty-eight patients (10 women, 18 men) with a median age of 70 years were included. Metastatic disease was confirmed in 21 patients (75%) after radical cystectomy while seven patients showed mUC at first diagnosis. Twelve patients (42.8%) received first line and 16 patients second line pembrolizumab. The objective response rate (ORR) was 39% (CR in 7%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 5.5 and 20 months. Focusing on changes of sex hormone levels during ICI, a significant increase in FSH levels and decrease of the LH/FSH ratio was noticed in responders (p = 0.035), yet without sex-specific significance. When adjusted for sex and treatment line, a significant increase of FSH levels was confirmed in men during second line pembrolizumab. Focusing on baseline levels, LH/FSH ratio was significantly higher in female responders (p = 0.043) compared to non-responders. In women, increased LH levels and LH/FSH ratio were associated with better PFS (p = 0.014 for LH, p = 0.016 for LH/FSH ratio) and OS (p = 0.026 and p = 0.018). In male patients, increased E2 levels were linked with improved PFS (p

Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody-drug conjugate and a promising agent for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). However, evaluations in end-stage renal disease patients undergoing hemodialysis are unreported. Here, we report such a case. A 74-year-old woman with mUC, on hemodialysis for complete urinary tract extirpation, was diagnosed with multiple pulmonary metastases after treatment with gemcitabine-carboplatin followed by pembrolizumab. As third-line therapy, she received a standard dose of EV. She achieved complete response after 2 cycles without grade 3 or higher adverse events, demonstrating the utility of EV in this setting.

Background: While the treatment guidelines have been established for pure urothelial carcinoma (pUC), patients with variant type urothelial carcinoma (vUC) face limited effective treatment options. The effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with vUC remains uncertain and necessitates additional research. Method: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study to explore the effectiveness of ICI in patients with pUC or vUC in Taiwan. We evaluated the overall response rate (ORR) through univariate logistic regression analysis and examined the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Additionally, we employed univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models to analyze the data. Result: A total of 142 patients (116 pUC, 26 vUC) were included in our final analysis. The ORR was marginally higher in patients with pUC compared to those with vUC (34.5% vs. 23.1%, p = 0.26). Among all patients, 12.9% with pUC achieved a complete response (CR) after ICI treatment, while no vUC cases achieved CR (p = 0.05). There were no significant differences in PFS (median 3.6 months vs. 4.1 months, p = 0.34) or OS (median 16.3 months vs. 11.0 months, p = 0.24) when comparing patients with pUC or vUC. In the subgroup analysis, patients with pUC who underwent first-line ICI treatment exhibited significantly improved OS compared to those with vUC (24.6 months vs. 9.1 months, p = 0.004). Conclusion: The use of ICI as monotherapy is a feasible and effective treatment approach for patients with metastatic vUC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) yields poor prognosis and is diffi cult to treat. Immunotherapy strategies have developed rapidly in recent years, and clinical prognosis of mUC patients has been significantly improved. However, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) alone have limited efficacy, and some ICIs monotherapy indications for mUC have also been withdrawn in recent years. Therefore, combined therapy based on ICIs has become a research hotspot in the treatment of mUC. At present, multiple clinical studies of ICIs combined with chemotherapy, antibody-drug conjugates, and dual immunotherapy for multiple lines of treatment of mUC have proved that combined therapy possesses promising development prospect. In this article, latest progress in ICIbased combined treatment for mUC was reviewed, aiming to provide reference for clinicians. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Practical Pharmacy & Clinical Remedies is the property of Editorial Department of Practical Pharmacy & Clinical Remedies and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: The IMPACT UC I study assessed real-world treatment patterns, outcomes, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and costs in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) receiving first-line (1L) systemic treatment after the FDA approval of 1L immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study used 100% Medicare fee-for-service claims from 1/1/2015 to 6/30/2019 to identify patients aged ≥18 years diagnosed with UC with evidence of metastatic disease, continuously enrolled for 6 months before and after initial diagnosis. Patients were grouped by 1L treatment: cisplatin-containing chemotherapy, carboplatin-containing chemotherapy, ICI monotherapy, or nonplatinum-containing therapy. Unadjusted time on 1L treatment (TOT), overall survival (OS), HCRU, and total healthcare costs were analyzed. Results: Of 18 888 patients with mUC, 8630 (45.7%) had received identified 1L systemic treatment; platinum-containing chemotherapy was the most common (cisplatin-containing chemotherapy, 37.6%; carboplatin-containing chemotherapy, 30.2%). Cisplatin- and carboplatin-containing chemotherapy had the shortest time-to-treatment initiation (median, 1.7-3.0 months) and longest TOT (median, 4.0-4.3 months). Median OS was longest with cisplatin-containing chemotherapy (20.0 months) and shortest with ICI monotherapy (7.6 months). Cisplatin- and carboplatin-containing chemotherapy were associated with highest HCRU; total healthcare costs were approximately 2-fold higher with ICI monotherapy vs other 1L treatments ($10 359 vs $5042-$5709 per patient per month). Conclusion: 1L platinum-containing chemotherapy resulted in the longest median OS and highest HCRU, whereas 1L ICI treatment had the shortest median OS and the highest costs. Over 50% of patients diagnosed with advanced UC (aUC) received no systemic therapy, highlighting the importance of optimal 1L treatment decisions in aUC. The IMPACT UC I study assessed real-world treatment patterns, outcomes, healthcare resource utilization, and costs in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma receiving first-line systemic treatment after the FDA approval of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Immune checkpoint inhibitors such as programmed cell death/−ligand 1 inhibitor and cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte‐associated antigen‐4 inhibitors have been widely used for various advanced malignancies. The mechanism of action for these inhibitors is the improvement of antitumor immunity via T‐cell modulation. On the contrary, immune‐related adverse events such as autoimmune colitis might arise in association with T‐cell activation. Upper gastrointestinal adverse events related to pembrolizumab have rarely been reported. Case presentation A 72‐year‐old man underwent laparoscopic radical cystectomy for muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (pT2N0M0). Multiple lymph node metastases appeared in the paraaortic region. First‐line chemotherapy comprising gemcitabine and carboplatin failed to stop disease progression. After the administration of pembrolizumab as second‐line treatment, the patient showed symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Esophagogastroduodenoscopic biopsy of the gastric body showed severe lymphoplasmacytic and neutrophilic infiltration. Conclusion We present acute gastritis related to pembrolizumab. Early eradication therapy may be able to control immune checkpoint inhibitor‐related gastritis.

Background: Phase II trials showed the efficacy of anti-HER2 RC48-ADC (disitamab vedotin) for HER2-positive metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). This study evaluated RC48 alone verses in combination with immunotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic UC using real-world data. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter, real-world study included patients with locally advanced or metastatic UC who received RC48 in five hospitals in China between July 2021 and April 2022. The outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events. Results: Thirty-six patients were included. The patients were 47–87 years, and 26 (72.2%) were male. Eighteen patients received RC48 alone, and 18 received RC48 combined with a programmed death-1 antibody. The median PFS was 5.4 months. The median OS was not reached. The 6-month and 1-year PFS rates were 38.8% and 15.5%, respectively. The 1-year OS rate was 79.6%. Fourteen (38.9%) patients achieved a partial response, and the ORR was 38.9%. Eleven patients had stable disease, and the DCR was 69.4%. The median PFS for patients who received RC48 combined with immunotherapy and those who received RC48 alone was 8.5 and 5.4 months, respectively. The main treatment-related adverse events included anemia, hypoesthesia, fatigue, and elevated transaminase. No treatment-related death occurred. Conclusion: RC48 alone or combined with immunotherapy might benefit patients with locally advanced or metastatic UC, regardless of impaired renal function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Urothelial carcinoma of the large, nested variant is a specific histological morphology subtype of urothelial carcinoma. Although it is a rare variant, it requires specific attention due to its bland histology and the fact that it may potentially be missed in routine biopsies. In this study, we identify Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor-3 (FGFR-3) as the most common mutation present in this subtype among other potential targetable mutations. All our cases of this variant also harbored other potentially actionable mutations in other genes, which could also be amenable to novel targeted therapy. Patients with this variant may benefit from additional molecular screening to identify potential therapeutic targets that could improve the clinical outcome of such patients. The large, nested variant of urothelial carcinoma (LNVUC) is characterized by bland histomorphology mimicking that of benign von Brunn nests. In the current study, we aimed to investigate the Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor-3 (FGFR-3) activation and missense mutation in 38 cases, including 6 cases diagnosed with LNVUC and 32 with metastatic invasive urothelial carcinoma (UC). Initially, six formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples of the LNVUC were subjected to whole-exome sequencing (WES), and then we performed targeted sequencing on 32 cases of metastatic invasive UC of various morphological subtypes, which were interrogated for the FGFR3. Our results revealed 3/6 (50%) LNVUC cases evaluated by WES in our study showed an activating mutation in FGFR-3, 33% showed an activating mutation in PIK3CA, and 17% showed activating mutation in GNAS or MRE11. Additionally, 33% of cases showed a truncating mutation in CDKN1B. All LNVUC in our study that harbored the FGFR-3 mutation showed additional activating or truncating mutations in other genes. Overall, 6/32 (18.75%) cases of random metastatic invasive UC showed missense mutations of the FGFR-3 gene. The LNVUC variant showed the higher incidence of FGFR-3 mutations compared to other types of mutations. Additionally, all LNVUC cases show additional activating or truncating mutations in other genes, thus being amenable to novel targeted therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Erdafitinib, a fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor is a standard post chemotherapy advanced treatment line for metastatic urothelial carcinoma harboring FGFR2/3 genomic alterations. It was approved based on a phase 2 clinical trial, revealing a 40% response rate, and 13.8 months overall survival. These FGFR genomic alterations are uncommon. Thus, real-world data on erdafitinb use is scant. We herein describe erdafitinib treatment outcome in a real world patient cohort. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients treated with erdafitinib from 9 Israeli medical centers. Results: Twenty-five patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (median age 73, 64% male, 80% with visceral metastases) were treated with erdafitinib between January 2020 to October 2022. A clinical benefit (complete response 12%, partial response 32%, stable disease 12%) was seen in 56%. Median progression-free survival was 2.7 months, and median overall survival 6.73 months. Treatment related toxicity = grade 3 occurred in 52%, and 32% discontinued therapy due to adverse events. Conclusions: Erdafitinib therapy is associated with a clinical benefit in the realworld setting, and associated with similar toxicity as reported in prospective clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Clinical trials investigating efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) revealed sex-specific divergent outcomes in urothelial cancer (UC), suggesting that sex hormones might play an important role in gender-specific dimorphisms of response upon ICI. However, further clinical investigations are still needed to understand the influence of sex hormones in UC. The aim of this study was to get further insights on the prognostic and predictive value of sex hormone levels in patients with metastatic UC (mUC) who underwent ICI. Material and methods: Sex hormone levels of patients with mUC including luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), LH/FSH ratio, prolactin, testosterone and 17β-estradiol (E2) were evaluated at baseline and during ICI at 6/8 weeks and 12/14 weeks. Results: Twenty-eight patients (10 women, 18 men) with a median age of 70 years were included. Metastatic disease was confirmed in 21 patients (75%) after radical cystectomy while seven patients showed mUC at first diagnosis. Twelve patients (42.8%) received first line and 16 patients second line pembrolizumab. The objective response rate (ORR) was 39% (CR in 7%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 5.5 and 20 months. Focusing on changes of sex hormone levels during ICI, a significant increase in FSH levels and decrease of the LH/FSH ratio was noticed in responders (p = 0.035), yet without sex-specific significance. When adjusted for sex and treatment line, a significant increase of FSH levels was confirmed in men during second line pembrolizumab. Focusing on baseline levels, LH/FSH ratio was significantly higher in female responders (p = 0.043) compared to non-responders. In women, increased LH levels and LH/FSH ratio were associated with better PFS (p = 0.014 for LH, p = 0.016 for LH/FSH ratio) and OS (p = 0.026 and p = 0.018). In male patients, increased E2 levels were linked with improved PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p = 0.039). Conclusion: Increased LH and LH/FSH values in women as well as high E2 levels in men were significant predictors of better survival. Elevated LH/FSH ratio was predictive of better response to ICI in women. These results show first clinical evidence of the potential role of sex hormones as prognostic and predictive biomarker in mUC. Further prospective analyses are needed to corroborate our findings. Plain language summary: Urothelial carcinoma (UC) presents as aggressive disease with a greater incidence in men, yet a more aggressive course of disease in women. Patients with metastatic UC receive a chemotherapy regimen as the gold standard, based on an included platin substance. In the case of having contraindications to chemotherapy, checkpoint immunotherapy, priming the immune system to the tumor, is the treatment of choice. Furthermore, immunotherapy is used as second line therapy in progressive disease after chemotherapy and as maintenance therapy in stable tumor conditions after completing the chemotherapy regimen. Evidence shows that sex hormones of the hypothalamus–hypophysis axis influence development and course of UC. The sex hormones luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) stimulate estrogen (E2) production with a negative feedback function on the LH and FSH secretion. High levels of E2 present with a protective effect against UC. Sex has furthermore shown to predict potential response to immunotherapy. This study therefore focused on monitoring and correlating changes of sex hormone levels in 28 patients during therapy with checkpoint inhibitors. This first study assessing changes in sex hormones and the influence of baseline sex hormone values on survival in UC shows that responders to immunotherapy had significantly increased FSH levels. FSH furthermore increased in male patients receiving second line immunotherapy. High values of LH and a high LH/FSH ratio at baseline correlated with better overall survival in female patients. High E2 levels were indicative of better survival in male patients. The study results represent first suggestive prognostic and predictive results to the response of immunotherapy in UC. Highlights: Increased LH and LH/FSH values in women as well as high E2 levels in men were significant predictors of better survival. Elevated LH/FSH ratio was predictive of better response to immunotherapy in women. First clinical evidence of the potential role of sex hormones as prognostic and predictive biomarkers in metastatic urothelial cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard for first-line treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, pembrolizumab, and avelumab have each demonstrated survival benefits for second-line therapy and maintenance therapy. In addition, antibody-drug conjugate enfortumab vedotin has improved prognosis as a third-line treatment in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. However, not all patients are eligible for first-line, maintenance, and late-line therapy. Therefore, there are unmet needs for more effective and safe drug treatment in metastatic urothelial carcinoma settings. We review the current treatment and prospects during the next ten years for metastatic urothelial carcinoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This 5-year analysis of real-world data confirms the durable response and long-term survival with ICTs in a broader range of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. After 24 months, PFS and OS curves remained nearly flat. The safety profile was consistent with previous reports, and no new safety signals were observed. Background: In this study, we report real-world results from the 5-year follow-up data of urothelial carcinoma patients treated with immune checkpoint blockade therapies (ICTs). Patients and Methods: Metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients treated with at least one course of ICT were included in the study. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of treatment with ICT, and safety. Median follow-up, PFS, and OS were estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Data of 201 eligible patients were analyzed. The median age of the patients was 66 (37-86) years, and 156 (84.3%) were male. The majority of patients (94.6%) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS scores of 0 to 1 and primary tumor in the bladder was predominant (87.5%). The median follow-up time was 54 (1.15-65) months. The rate of complete response (CR) to ICT, partial response (PR) rate, and ORR were 10.4% (n = 21), 22.4% (n = 45), and 32.4% (n = 66), respectively. The median duration of response (DOR) was 34.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 29.2-42.1). Of the 66 patients who responded to treatment, 28 (42%) had an ongoing response at the time of the analysis. Median PFS and OS were 3.8 (2.6-5.8) months and 9.4 (7.4-11.4) months, respectively. The 5-year PFS and OS rates were 9.8% and 12.8%, respectively. Fifty-eight percent of patients experienced a treatment-related adverse event of any grade, and 33 (16.4%) patients had a grade 3 to 4 adverse event. Conclusion: This 5-year analysis of real-world data confirms the durable response and long-term survival with ICT in metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This study evaluated the prognostic value of a sustained high Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) during first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Methods: Between January 2018 and February 2022, 123 patients received platinum-based chemotherapy at Nagoya City University Hospital and affiliated institutions. Of these, 118 eligible patients who showed an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) between 0 and 2 were retrospectively examined. Based on body mass index and serum albumin levels, GNRI was calculated immediately before and after the first primary chemotherapy cycle. Patients were divided into two groups based on GNRI: GNRI sustained ≥92 in sustainable (n = 63) and GNRI <92 in unsustainable (n = 55) groups, respectively. Clinical outcomes were compared. Results: No significant differences were noted between the two groups for age, gender, cycle of first-line treatment, and type of series of sequential treatments after failure of first-line therapy. Median overall survival from the start of first-line chemotherapy was 30.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 20.9–NA) for sustainable and 12.6 months (95% CI: 9.0–21.2) for unsustainable groups, respectively (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified ECOG-PS:2 and fatigue, an adverse event, as independent predictors of unsustainable GNRI transition (95% CI: 1.29–90.6, odds ratio [OR]: 10.8; 95% CI: 1.06–26.9, OR: 5.34, respectively). Conclusion: : Sustaining a high level of GNRI was an important prognostic indicator in patients with mUC receiving first-line chemotherapy. Appropriate intervention for controlling adverse events, including fatigue, may enhance physical strength during cancer treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Muscle-infiltrating urothelial carcinoma of the bladder is the most common genitourinary cancer. Immunotherapeutic agents targeting protein-1 programmed death or protein-1 programmed death ligand are currently considered the standard treatment in patients with either inoperable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (MUC) after platinum-based chemotherapy failure. Case presentation Here we report the case of a Caucasian male patient with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with second-line atezolizumab within a trial who achieved complete response by computed tomography (CT), but suddenly died due to cardiac tamponade resulting from malignant pericardial infiltration. Histopathology confirmed this as the only site of disease progression. Conclusions Cardiovascular toxicity of atezolizumab was considered within differential diagnoses, however histopathological examination revealed progression of malignancy in the pericardium as the cause of the sudden death. This is the first published case report of a patient treated with second-line atezolizumab in whom the rare disease progression of pericardial infiltration was confirmed. Despite its rarity, the clinicians should always consider the possibility of pericardial metastases.

BackgroundErdafitinib, a fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor is a standard post chemotherapy advanced treatment line for metastatic urothelial carcinoma harboring FGFR2/3 genomic alterations. It was approved based on a phase 2 clinical trial, revealing a 40% response rate, and 13.8 months overall survival. These FGFR genomic alterations are uncommon. Thus, real-world data on erdafitinb use is scant. We herein describe erdafitinib treatment outcome in a real world patient cohort.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the data of patients treated with erdafitinib from 9 Israeli medical centers.ResultsTwenty-five patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (median age 73, 64% male, 80% with visceral metastases) were treated with erdafitinib between January 2020 to October 2022. A clinical benefit (complete response 12%, partial response 32%, stable disease 12%) was seen in 56%. Median progression-free survival was 2.7 months, and median overall survival 6.73 months. Treatment related toxicity ≥ grade 3 occurred in 52%, and 32% discontinued therapy due to adverse events.ConclusionsErdafitinib therapy is associated with a clinical benefit in the real world setting, and associated with similar toxicity as reported in prospective clinical trials.

PD-L1 status assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) has failed to reliably predict outcomes for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) on immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). PD-L1 promoter methylation is an epigenetic mechanism that has been shown to regulate PD-L1 mRNA expression in various malignancies. The aim of our present study was to evaluate the predictive potential of PD-L1 promoter methylation status (mPD-L1) in ICB-treated mUC compared to conventional IHC-based PD-L1 assessment. We quantified mPD-L1 in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue sections using an established quantitative methylation-specific PCR assay (qMSP) in a well-characterized multicenter ICB-treated cohort comprising N = 107 patients with mUC. Additionally, PD-L1 protein expression in tumor tissues was assessed using regulatory approved IHC protocols. The effect of pharmacological hypomethylation by the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor decitabine in combination with interferon-γ stimulation in urothelial carcinoma cell lines was investigated by IHC and FACS. mPD-L1 hypomethylation predicted objective response rate at the first staging on ICB. Patients with tumors categorized as PD-L1 hypomethylated (lower quartile) showed significantly prolonged progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after ICB initiation. In contrast, PD-L1 protein expression status neither correlated with response nor survival. In multivariable Cox regression analyses, PD-L1 promoter hypermethylation remained an independent predictor of unfavorable PFS and OS. In urothelial carcinoma cell lines, pharmacological demethylation led to an upregulation of membranous PD-L1 expression and an enhanced inducibility of PD-L1 expression by interferon γ. Hypomethylation of the PD-L1 promoter is a promising predictive biomarker for response to ICB in patients with mUC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Despite the fact that guidelines recommend monitoring of quality of life during all phases of treatment in urothelial carcinoma, prospective data about health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma undergoing immunotherapy are sparse. Consequently, we performed a prospective clinical pilot study about HRQoL using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Immune Checkpoint Modulator (FACT-ICM) questionnaire. Materials and Methods: Formally, this study is a prospective uni-centric noninterventional observation from January 2021 to December 2021. Results: Fourteen patients with a mean age of 73.9 years (SD 8.8) participated in the study. The physical well-being subscale of FACT-G is most impaired during therapy with mean scores of 7.5, 6.2, and 4.0 followed by the emotional well-being. The FACT-G total score is stable during therapy with mean scores of 51.1, 50.4, and 48.0 and it is not significantly decreasing during therapy (p = 0.317). Furthermore, the symptom burden of these patients is low and not significantly changing over time (p = 0.500), but survival decreases significantly if symptom burden is high (FACT-ICM score over 40; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Physical and emotional needs have a strong impact on HRQoL and should be dealt with during treatment. If symptom burden is high, survival decreases. This needs further evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody-drug conjugate and a promising agent for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). However, evaluations in end-stage renal disease patients undergoing hemodialysis are unreported. Here, we report such a case. A 74-year-old woman with mUC, on hemodialysis for complete urinary tract extirpation, was diagnosed with multiple pulmonary metastases after treatment with gemcitabine-carboplatin followed by pembrolizumab. As third-line therapy, she received a standard dose of EV. She achieved complete response after 2 cycles without grade 3 or higher adverse events, demonstrating the utility of EV in this setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Biomarker-guided clinical trials are increasingly common in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), yet patients for whom contemporary tumor tissue is not available are not eligible. Technological advancements in sequencing have made cell-free circulating DNA (cfDNA) next-generation sequencing (NGS) readily available in the clinic. The objective of the current study was to determine whether the genomic profile of mUC detected by NGS of cfDNA is similar to historical tumor tissue NGS studies. A secondary objective was to determine whether the frequency of genomic alterations (GAs) differed between lower tract mUC (mLTUC) and upper tract mUC (mUTUC). METHODS: Patients from 13 academic medical centers in the United States who had a diagnosis of mUC between 2014 and 2017 and for whom cfDNA NGS results were available were included. cfDNA profiling was performed using a commercially available platform (Guardant360) targeting 73 genes. RESULTS: Of 369 patients with mUC, 294 were diagnosed with mLTUC and 75 with mUTUC. A total of 2130 GAs were identified in the overall mUC cohort: 1610 and 520, respectively, in the mLTUC and mUTUC cohorts. In the mLTUC cohort, frequently observed GAs were similar between cfDNA NGS and historical tumor tissue studies, including tumor protein p53 (TP53) (P = 1.000 and .115, respectively), AT-rich interaction domain 1A (ARID1A) (P = .058 and .058, respectively), phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) (P = .058 and .067, respectively), erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2) (P = .565 and .074, respectively), and fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) (P = .164 and .014, respectively). No significant difference was observed with regard to the frequency of GAs between patients with mLTUC and mUTUC. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with mUC for whom no tumor tissue was available, cfDNA NGS was able to identify a similar profile of GAs for biomarker-driven clinical trials compared with tumor tissue. Despite the more aggressive clinical course, cases of mUTUC demonstrated a circulating tumor DNA genomic landscape that was similar to that of mLTUC. Cancer 2018;124:2115-24. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Our expanding knowledge of immunotherapy for solid tumors has led to an explosion of clinical trials aimed at urothelial carcinoma. The primary strategy is centered on unleashing the immune system by releasing the inhibitory signals propagated by programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and its ligand programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1). Many antibody constructs have been developed to block these interactions and are used in clinical trials. The Food and Drug Administration has already approved a number of checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4) monoclonal antibodies including ipilimumab; anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies including nivolumab and pembrolizumab; anti-PD-L1 antibodies including atezolizumab, avelumab, and durvalumab. One of the latest inhibitors is durvalumab, which is a high-affinity human immunoglobulin G1 kappa monoclonal antibody and blocks the interaction of PD-L1 with PD-1 and CD80. Currently, there are a number of ongoing trials in advanced urothelial carcinoma both using durvalumab monotherapy and in combination with other targeted therapies. In addition, durvalumab is being investigated in the non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma, which is centered around intravenous formulations. These exciting developments have added a significant number of therapies in a previously limited treatment landscape.

Simple Summary: Urothelial carcinoma is a malignancy of the cells lining the genitourinary tract but it most commonly occurs in the bladder. Once urothelial carcinoma has spread outside of the genitourinary tract, survival outcomes are poor despite the standard of care treatment of chemotherapy followed by immunotherapy. Genetic sequencing of cancer tissue has identified targets for new anti-cancer drugs. This review summarizes the evidence regarding the efficacy of targeted therapies in advanced urothelial carcinoma. This review describes the current landscape of targeted therapies in urothelial carcinoma. The standard of care for advanced urothelial carcinoma patients remains platinum-based combination chemotherapy followed by immunotherapy. However, median overall survival for these patients is still <1 year and there is an urgent need for alternative therapies. The advent of next-generation sequencing has allowed widespread comprehensive molecular characterization of urothelial tumors and, subsequently, the development of therapies targeting specific molecular pathways implicated in carcinogenesis such as FGFR inhibition, Nectin-4, Trop-2, and HER2 targeting. As these therapies are demonstrated to be effective in the second-line setting, they will be advanced in the treatment paradigm to localized and even non-muscle invasive disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Oxidative stress plays an important role in cancer pathogenesis, and thiobarbituric acid-reactive substance level (TBARS)—a parameter of lipid peroxidation—has prognostic significance in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). However, the effect of cisplatin (CDDP)-based chemotherapy on oxidative stress, coenzyme Q10, and antioxidants remains unknown. The objective of this prospective study was to determine possible changes in the CoQ10 (coenzyme Q10)/lipids ratio, antioxidants (α-tocopherol, γ-tocopherol, β-carotene, CoQ10), total antioxidant status (TAS), and TBARS in plasma at baseline and during first-line chemotherapy based on CDDP in mUC subjects. In this prospective study, 63 consecutive patients were enrolled. The median age was 66 years (range 39–84), performance status according to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) was 2 in 7 subjects (11.1%), and visceral metastases were present in 31 (49.2%) patients. Plasma antioxidants were determined by HPLC and TAS and TBARS spectrophotometrically. After two courses of chemotherapy, we recorded significant enhancements compared to baseline for total cholesterol (p < 0.0216), very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol (p < 0.002), triacylglycerols (p < 0.0083), α-tocopherol (p < 0.0044), and coenzyme Q10-TOTAL (p < 0.0001). Ratios of CoQ10/total cholesterol, CoQ10/HDL-cholesterol, and CoQ10/LDL-cholesterol increased during chemotherapy vs. baseline (p < 0.0048, p < 0.0101, p < 0.0032, respectively), while plasma TBARS declined (p < 0.0004). The stimulation of antioxidants could be part of the defense mechanism during CDDP treatment. The increased index of CoQ10-TOTAL/lipids could reflect the effect of CDDP protecting lipoproteins from peroxidation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To evaluate factors to predict overall survival of metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients treated with gemcitabine plus cisplatin chemotherapy or pembrolizumab therapy. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated two metastatic urothelial carcinoma cohorts treated with (i) gemcitabine plus cisplatin or (ii) pembrolizumab. The gemcitabine plus cisplatin cohort was treated from December 2005 through December 2014 while the pembrolizumab cohort was treated from January 2018 through December 2020. Using multivariate analyses, we evaluated the risk factors for overall survival in each cohort and compared them. None of the gemcitabine plus cisplatin cohort patients were treated with pembrolizumab. All patients in the pembrolizumab cohort were treated with prior platinum‐based chemotherapy. Results: There were 184 patients in the gemcitabine plus cisplatin cohort and 91 in the pembrolizumab cohort. The mean follow‐up periods were 714 and 284 days, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the risk factors for overall survival in the gemcitabine plus cisplatin cohort were liver metastasis, worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (1 or more), no primary site resection, and a high prognostic index (1 or more). In the pembrolizumab cohort, liver metastasis, bone metastasis, and worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group‐performance status (1 or more), and high prognostic index (1 or more) were the risk factors for overall survival. In the pembrolizumab cohort, patients with a complete response or partial response during prior platinum‐based chemotherapy had better overall survival with the following pembrolizumab treatment than those with stable or progressive disease (P = 0.004). Conclusions: Considering the similarity of these risk factors in two sequential treatments, it may be possible to predict the response to pembrolizumab according to the response to prior chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]