Search

Although relevant, collective narcissism, a form of group identification based on unrealistic beliefs about ingroup superiority and uniqueness, remains understudied (especially in local contexts) and often confused with patriotism. This study evaluated whether collective narcissists, just like narcissists, prefer to engage in intuitive thinking compared to cognitive reflection and reject different opinions. The first goal of this study was to evaluate whether the classes of collective narcissists existed in samples from Croatia (N = 515), Serbia (N = 1070), Hungary (N = 506), and Denmark (N = 566, selected as a country from a different historical and cultural context) based on the pattern of responses on items measuring national identification and collective narcissism. The second goal was to evaluate the performance of the established classes on the cognitive reflection tasks (CRT) and compare their closedmindedness scores. Data were collected within the ICSMP COVID-19 project. Regarding the first goal, the latent class analysis suggested the existence of three latent classes in samples from Croatia, Hungary, and Denmark and four in the sample from Serbia, probably due to the larger sample size. Furthermore, in data from Croatia, Hungary and Serbia, classes of collective narcissists (individuals scoring high on national identification and national narcissism items) were established. In the Danish sample, a similar pattern (but with lower scores on national narcissism items) was found. Across all countries, a significant difference between classes was found in CRT performance (Croatia: χ2(6) = 34.1, p < .001, Cramer V = .18 ; Hungary: χ2(6) = 30.6, p < .001, Cramer V = .18 ; Serbia: χ2(9) = 22.1, p = .008, Cramer V = .11 ; Denmark: χ2(6) = 19.3, p = .003, Cramer V = .13) and closed-mindedness (Croatia: F(2, 509) = 10.2, p < .001, partial η2 = .04 ; Hungary: F(2, 503) = 14.1, p < .001, partial η2 = .05 ; Serbia: F(3, 954) = 10.4, p < .001, partial η2 = .03 ; Denmark: F(2, 563) = 33.1, p < .001, partial η2 = .11). The highest proportion of participants responding incorrectly on all CRT items and the lowest proportion of participants responding correctly to all items (except in the Danish sample) was established among the collective narcissists. Collective narcissists also were the most closedminded (except in the Danish sample). Overall, the study confirmed that collective narcissists, just as narcissists, prefer intuitive thinking and do not take interlocutors with different opinions seriously.

Trust in the political system has been recognized as an important building block of well-functioning social systems. On the other hand, distrust in the political system can motivate individuals to find leadership and relevant information elsewhere. The lack of political trust can become a severe problem in crises as citizens may be unwilling to follow the recommendations of political leaders and rely on other sources of information. In other words, we hypothesized that distrust in politicians and the national parliament could represent a fertile ground for the development and spread of various conspiracy theories. We used three large-scale international data sets - European Social Survey rounds 9 (N = 49519 from 29 European countries) and round 10 (N = 26094 from 15 European countries available at the time when the manuscript was prepared), and ICSMP COVID-19 data (N = 51404 participants from 69 countries around the world) - to evaluate the relationships between trust in politicians and parliament and the support for conspiracy theories. The analyses were carried out at the individual and country level. To avoid the issue of reverse causality in our country-level analyses, aggregated data on political trust from ESS round 9 was used to predict aggregated support for conspiracy theories on secret groups making relevant political choices, scientists deceiving the public, and COVID-19 being artificially developed from ESS round 10 and conspiracy theories on COVID- 19 from ICSMP COVID-19 data. Individual-level analyses were based on the data on trust in politicians and parliament and support for conspiracy theories from ESS round 10. Results robustly confirm our expectations: on the individual level and in each country, participants who reported less trust in politicians and national parliaments also reported more belief in all the conspiracy theories (r between -.38 in Latvia and -.09 in Portugal, all p < .01). Moreover, belief in conspiracy theories on the national level was higher in countries with lower overall trust in politicians and national parliament (r between -.92 and -.86 in the data set consisting of ESS round 9 and ESS round 10 and r between -.77 and -.63 in the data set consisting of ESS 9 and ICSMP COVID-19, all p < .01). These findings confirm the relevance of political (dis)trust in the development and spread of conspirational narratives and highlight the need to better understand its individual and contextual determinants.

Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2022. In this article the author name ‘Agustin Ibanez’ was incorrectly written as ‘Augustin Ibanez’. The original article has been corrected.

Tijekom pandemije COVID-19 iz različitih su izvora pristizale informacije i preporuke o tome kako bismo se trebali ponašati da izbjegnemo daljnje širenje zaraze. No, uz samu dostupnost informacija, važno je u obzir uzimati i to koliko građani informacije smatraju vjerodostojnim. Stoga je cilj ovog istraživanja bio provjeriti odnos povjerenja u različite institucije (znanost, medicinu, Stožer i političke institucije) i pridržavanja preventivnih mjera te namjera cijepljenja na uzorku odraslih Hrvata. Podaci su prikupljeni krajem listopada i početkom studenog 2020., pri čemu je konačni uzorak sačinjavalo 512 građana (46 % muškaraca). Primijenjena je analiza latentnih profila, koja je ugrubo ukazala na postojanje triju profila, sličnih po povjerenju u znanost i medicinu, ali različitih po povjerenju u Stožer i političke institucije. Daljnjim analizama utvrđeno je da, unatoč povjerenju u znanost i medicinu, povjerenje u političke institucije bitno određuje pridržavanje preventivnih mjera i namjere cijepljenja protiv virusa COVID-19, pri čemu su uvjerljivo najnepoželjnije rezultate postizali pojedinci iz klase koja je najmanje vjerovala političkim institucijama. Uvažavajući ograničenja uslijed načina prikupljanja i obrade podataka, ovakvi rezultati sugeriraju važnost povjerenja u političke institucije tijekom nepredviđenih nepovoljnih situacija, poput pandemije COVID-19.

Understanding the determinants of support for political systems seems crucial to understanding the stability of specific political regimes. Political context plays an important role in the meaning of political dissatisfaction and support for democratic or autocratic political systems. Earlier studies have demonstrated that in the context of "old " (Western) democracies, political dissatisfaction and critical citizens represent a relevant resource for democracy. Alternatively, citizens supporting democracy in "new "democracies (or post communist countries) also express favorable attitudes towards autocratic regimes. As the simultaneous support for autocracy and democracy seems contradictory, it is relevant to explore determinants of citizens' understanding of democratic and anti-democratic orientations. In this study, we focused on studying the role of political sophistication and attitudes on the political system in the prediction of support for democracy and autocracy on a youth sample from different European contexts. Therefore, next to testing the associations between political sophistication (political knowledge, personal interest in politics), satisfaction with democracy, and trust in executive and political institutions as predictors and support for democracy and autocracy as criteria, we also assessed whether the contribution of these factors varies across countries grouped as Former USSR countries, Central and Eastern European countries, Mediterranean countries, Western European countries, and Scandinavian countries. We used the survey data from the EU-funded MyPlace project, collected in 2012/2013 on youth samples from 14 European countries (total N = 16, 935). The analyses were conducted with age, gender, and socioeconomic status as control variables to increase the robustness of the findings. Altogether, our findings confirmed the role of political sophistication, trust, and satisfaction with democracy in predicting support for democracy and autocracy. However, the predictive contribution of these factors varied substantially across country groups, highlighting the relevance of contextual factors in determining citizens' understanding of political systems.

This report presents the main findings of multiple correspondence analyses (MCA) of the CHIEF online survey data conducted among secondary students (N = 2148) from a non probability purposive sample of 28 Croatian secondary schools as additional and complementary analyses to the descriptive and correlational analyses already conducted and described within the Croatian national survey report (Franc, Sučić, Pavlović, Maglić, and Milas, 2021). In this report, our focus is on young people’s cultural participation and its determinants, intending to further explore young people’s cultural participation. Specifically, our aim is to develop a locally specific typology of young people’ss’ patterns of cultural participation and to investigate the relative effects of selected sources/determinants of cultural literacy at the individual, school, and location levels. Out of the total of 25 indicators of individual cultural participation from the CHIEF survey, for the purpose of the analyses, we selected 19 indicators, and the following variables we investigated as potential determinants: gender, parents’ attained level of education, type of school programme (grammar or vocational) and urbanisation profile of students’ residence. In terms of new insights regarding a typology of young people’s patterns of cultural participation, with the MCA, we were able to identify two dimensions of participation (one dominantly determined by participation in activities reflecting participation in high cultural activities and a second principally denoting participation in non-socialising individual activities). Although these two dimensions enabled us to identify four types of students concerning their patterns of participation, it should be noted that the majority of our participants seem to be concentrated somewhat below the mid- point of the second dimension. However, our results indicate that a relatively small portion of surveyed students usually does not participate in more common cultural activities, especially those which implies socialising with friends or parents. In terms of the determinants of student cultural participation, the findings of the MCA, similarly to previous Croatian findings as well as results of correlation analyses of CHIEF survey data conducted within the Croatian national survey report (Franc et al., 2021), confirmed student gender, type of school programme and parental level of education asrelevant determinants of patterns of participation.

Uslijed digitalizacije, geopolitičkih previranja i migracija u Europi danas su više nego ikada istaknuti učinci sociokulturnoga konteksta (posebice kulturne globalizacije) na naše stavove i ponašanja. Mladi su posebno osjetljivi na (multi)kulturne utjecaje kojima su svakodnevno izloženi zbog intenzivne uključenosti u aktualna društvena zbivanja i specifičnosti razvojnog perioda. Izloženost i sudjelovanje u različitim multikulturnim elementima te nacionalizam i kulturna otvorenost imaju značajne učinke po njihove stavove, odnose i ponašanja prema drugim grupama, kao i njihove interkulturne kompetencije. Školsko okruženje ima važnu i aktivnu socijalizacijsku ulogu u oblikovanju socijalnog identiteta adolescenata stvarajući normativnu okolinu koja ima potencijal promovirati kulturnu otvorenost kroz odgojno-obrazovne aktivnosti. Stoga je prvi cilj istraživanja bio ispitati stavove prema manjinama, multikulturnu izloženost i kontakt te nacionalizam i kulturnu otvorenost adolescenata, dok je drugi cilj bio ispitati odnos multikulturne izloženosti i kontakta te nacionalizma i kulturne otvorenosti, uzimajući u obzir sociodemografske karakteristike adolescenata, kao i za međugrupne odnose potencijalno relevantne karakteristike škola i zajednica. Istraživanje je provedeno u sklopu CHIEF projekta na uzorku od 2134 adolescenta (57% djevojaka) u 28 srednjih škola u Republici Hrvatskoj. Adolescenti su iskazali pozitivan opći stav prema manjinama. Procjena razine međukulturnoga kontakta je niska, dok je međukulturna izloženost umjerena, kao i izraženost kulturne otvorenosti i nacionalizma. Učenici percipiraju umjerene prilike za učenje o temama ljudskih prava i nacionalnog identiteta u okviru srednjoškolske nastave. Regresijskom analizom provedenom u sklopu strukturalnih modela potvrđena je važnost kulturne otvorenosti, nacionalizma, percepcije zastupljenosti sadržaja u obrazovanju, roda i socioekonomskog statusa zajednice u oblikovanju općeg stava o manjinama. Kontakt s pripadnicima drugih kultura nije pridonio predviđanju općeg stava o manjinama neovisno o međukulturnoj izloženosti., Amid digitalization, geopolitical turmoil, and migrations in Europe, the effects of sociocultural context (especially cultural globalization) on attitudes and behaviours have become emphasized more than ever. Young people are susceptible to (multi)cultural influences to which they are exposed on a daily basis due to intensive involvement in contemporary social events and characteristics of their developmental period. Exposure to and participation in various multicultural elements, and nationalism and cultural openness substantially affect their attitudes, relationships, and behaviours towards other groups, as well as their intercultural competencies. The school environment plays an important and active socialization role in shaping the social identity of adolescents, creating a normative environment that has the potential to promote cultural openness via educational activities. Therefore, the first goal of our study was to explore the attitudes towards minorities, multicultural exposure and contact, and nationalism cultural openness of adolescents, while the second goal was to evaluate the relationships between multicultural exposure and contact, and nationalism and cultural openness, taking into account sociodemographic characteristics of adolescents, as well as characteristics of schools and communities deemed potentially relevant for intergroup relationships. The study was conducted within the CHIEF project on a sample of 2,134 adolescents (57% female) from 28 Croatian secondary schools. Adolescents have exhibited positive general attitudes toward minorities. The quantity of their self-reported multicultural contacts was low, while the levels of multicultural exposure, nationalism and cultural openness were moderate. The possibilities of learning about human rights and national identity within the secondary school curriculum were perceived as moderate. Regression analyses conducted within the context of structural equation modelling have confirmed the relevance of cultural openness, nationalism, perception of the presence of different contents in education, gender, and socioeconomic status of the community in determining the general attitudes towards minorities. Multicultural contacts did not provide an independent contribution to the prediction of general attitudes towards minorities when controlled for multicultural exposure.

COVID-19 vaccination is a vital tool in curbing the impact of the pandemic. However, despite its availability and great governmental and public health efforts in promoting confidence in the effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccines, vaccination rates in Croatia are not as high as hoped. Moreover, vaccines seem to be a polarizing issue in the Croatian public. Thus, understanding different determinants of vaccination attitudes is a prerequisite for developing an effective communication strategy. In this study, we focused on the role of political trust and trust in experts, ideological and demographic variables. A relatively large national sample (N = 1591) was recruited via a panel sampling company, and data were collected during December 2021 and January 2022. The results of structural equation modelling (SEM) showed that higher trust in experts, higher political trust, left-leaning political orientation, lower religiosity, higher educational level, older age and male sex predict positive COVID-19 vaccine attitudes, with trust in experts exhibiting the most substantial effect. Considered variables were further investigated in relation to vaccination uptake. Overall, the findings provide empirical support for the role of trust, especially trust in experts, in determining vaccine attitudes.

U ovom radu istražujemo kako srednjoškolci u Hrvatskoj razumiju i doživljavaju svoj kulturni identitet te koji su oblici njihove kulturne participacije. U sklopu međunarodnog projekta CHIEF u Hrvatskoj je provedeno kvalitativno istraživanje kojim smo obuhvatili učenike drugih razreda triju srednjih škola, jedne u velikom gradu, druge u manjem urbanom središtu i treće u ruralnom području. Pritom su provedeni polustrukturirani intervjui sa 60 učenika (po dvadeset iz svake škole) i devetero nastavnika (po troje iz svake škole). U sklopu projekta provedeno je i anketno istraživanje u 28 srednjih škola na više od 2000 učenika. Kvalitativni nalazi, potkrijepljeni nalazima anketnog istraživanja, pokazuju da se mladi ponajprije identificiraju kroz obrasce mjesta, regije i nacije pa tek onda kroz obrasce Europe i čovječanstva. Razlike između urbanih i ruralnih sredina nisu se pokazale presudnima za različitost stavova i oblika kulturne participacije mladih. Važnija se čini izloženost multikulturnom iskustvu uz ekonomsku dimenziju uže regije koja je u nekim slučajevima utjecala na značenje koje mladi pridaju etničkoj različitosti u vlastitoj sredini. S obzirom na visoko mjesto koje pripada glazbi na ljestvici najčešćih oblika kulturne participacije mladih prema rezultatima anketnog istraživanja, važan je nalaz kvalitativnog dijela istraživanja koji ukazuje na dominaciju stilova u vezi s popularnom glazbom zvanom „cajka“ neovisno o stupnju urbanizacije (veliki grad naspram ruralne sredine)., In this paper, we investigate how secondary school pupils in Croatia understand and experience their cultural identity and forms of their cultural participation. As part of the international Horizon 2020 CHIEF project, qualitative research was conducted in Croatia, which included second-grade pupils from three secondary schools; one in a large city, another in a smaller urban centre, and the third in a rural area. We interviewed 60 pupils (twenty from each school) and nine teachers (three from each school) using a semi-structured form. Additionally, a survey was conducted in 28 secondary schools on more than 2,000 pupils as part of the project. Qualitative findings, supported by the survey findings, indicate that young people primarily identify themselves through the modes and patterns of place, region and nation, and only then through the modes and patterns of Europe and humanity. The differences between urban and rural environments did not prove to be decisive for the diversity of attitudes and forms of cultural participation of young people. Exposure to multicultural experiences seems to be more important, along with the economic dimension of the narrower region, which in some cases influenced the meaning young people attach to ethnic diversity in their own environment. Considering the high position of music on a scale of young people’s most common forms of cultural participation, suggested by the survey results, the important finding of the qualitative part of the research is the dominance of styles in connection with popular music called ‘cajka’, regardless of the degree of urbanization (big city versus rural area).

U radu se provjerava mogućnost objašnjenja nekoliko razina socijalnog identiteta adolescenata (privrženost četvrti, gradu/mjestu, regiji, Hrvatskoj, Europi, Europskoj uniji, čovječanstvu), kao i nacionalnog te globalnog identiteta s temeljnim osobnim vrijednostima. Istraživanje se temelji na anketnim podacima 2148 učenika iz 28 srednjih škola u Hrvatskoj, prikupljenima krajem 2019. i početkom 2020. godine u okviru CHIEF (EU Obzor) projekta. Osobne vrijednosti mjerene su skraćenom verzijom Swartzova upitnikavrijednosti (Ten Item Values Inventory), izraženost različitih razina socijalne identifikacije jednočestičnim mjerama, a izraženost nacionalnog i globalnog identiteta Ljestvicom globalnog identiteta (Global Identity Scale). Sukladno dosadašnjim istraživanjima na odraslim sudionicima u drugim zemljama, objašnjenju izraženosti nacionalne identifikacije najviše doprinosi važnost zadržavanja tradicionalnih odnosa (poslušnosti i ograničavanja vlastitih akcija s ciljem održavanja postojećega stanja), dok objašnjenju izraženosti globalne identifikacije najviše doprinosi važnost otvorenosti za promjene (slobode misli i djelovanja te sklonost promjenama). Rezultati se raspravljaju u kontekstu važnosti razumijevanja sadržaja i značenja različitih razina i tipova socijalnog identiteta.

The importance of political trust has been recognized for centuries since countries' social harmony, economic efficacy, and democracy are built upon it. However, the strength, sources, and manifestations of political trust are still not fully understood, especially when considering the interplay between trust at the national and supranational (European) levels. Utilizing the European Social Survey data (round ESS9), we set to explore the levels of interpersonal and political trust across Mediterranean countries, focusing on institutional and political efficacy and procedural justice as determinants of political trust in the national political system, national criminal justice system, and the EU political system. Our results show that Mediterranean citizens generally expressed higher levels of interpersonal trust than political trust (except for Albania, Cyprus and Montenegro), with the highest levels of interpersonal trust not exceeding the moderate level. Trust in the European Parliament was the highest among the evaluated political institutions in all countries. Across all observed countries, procedural justice and institutional efficacy proved to be the most consistent and strongest predictors of trust in the investigated political institutions. Overall, the predictors explained a higher proportion of trust in the national political system than trust in the EU political system.

Unatoč sve većem zanimanju javnosti i javnim raspravama na temu klimatskih promjena uzrokovanih ljudskim djelovanjem, uočljiv je nedostatak istraživanja o stavovima i ponašanju mladih u vezi s klimatskim promjenama u hrvatskom kontekstu. Naime, iako su mladi budućnost svakog društva i nosioci razvoja, odnos njihove osviještenosti o klimatskim promjenama i namjera ponašanja u vidu smanjenja negativnog ljudskog utjecaja na okoliš nedovoljno je istražen. U ovom radu usmjerili smo se na ispitivanje odnosa osviještenosti mladih o klimatskim promjenama i namjera ponašanja u vidu smanjenja negativnog utjecaja na okoliš na temelju podataka 2134 učenika iz 28 srednjih škola u Republici Hrvatskoj, prikupljenih anketnim istraživanjem unutar projekta CHIEF. Testirali smo strukturne modele namjera sudjelovanja u aktivnostima u vezi sa zaštitom okoliša te osviještenosti o klimatskim promjenama, rodom sudionika, tipom školskog programa (gimnazijski/strukovni), procijenjenom mogućnošću učenja o klimatskim promjenama u školi te veličinom mjesta u kojem je škola smještena kao potencijalnim moderatorima navedenog odnosa. Provedene analize potvrdile su osviještenost o klimatskim promjenama kao značajnog prediktora opće spremnosti sudjelovanja u aktivnostima zaštite okoliša, ali i ukazale na to da snaga tog odnosa ovisi o rodu, tipu školskog programa i procijenjenoj mogućnosti učenja o klimatskim promjenama u školi., Despite the growing public interest and debate on anthropogenic climate change, there is a noticeable lack of research on the attitudes and behaviour of young people in relation to climate change in the Croatian context. Namely, although young people are the future of every society and bearers of development, the relationship between their awareness of climate change and intentions towards reducing the negative human impact on the environment has been insufficiently researched. In this paper, we focused on examining the above-mentioned relationship based on the data of 2,134 students from 28 secondary schools in the Republic of Croatia, collected within the CHIEF project survey. We tested structural models of intentions to participate in activities related to environmental protection and awareness of the importance of such action, with participant gender, type of school programme (grammar/vocational), and perceived availability of teaching content related to environmental protection as potential moderators of the aforementioned relationship. The conducted analyses confirmed awareness of climate change as a significant predictor of general willingness to participate in environmental protection activities, but also indicated that the strength of this relationship is moderated by gender, type of school program and the estimated learning opportunities regarding climate change at school.

Research to date has shown that greater participation in multicultural activities could have the effect of reducing prejudice against different cultures. In case this assumption is correct, the correlation between multicultural experience and intergroup attitudes should be positive. The current research was carried out within the EU Horizon 2020 CHIEF project, which involved the participation of nine countries from Europe and Asia. In each country, a survey was conducted on approximately 2, 000 high school students with the modal age of 16 years, from around thirty schools stratified according to the level of urbanization. Furthermore, within each locality, schools were chosen to reflect diversity in other country relevant variables, such as the SES, ethnic makeup school type, and others. The whole sample thus comprised around 18, 000 students from nine countries. Each student completed an online or paper-based survey that included, among other questions a scale of participation in multicultural activities and the attitudes toward equal rights for immigrants. To address the question of the relationship between the amount of multicultural experience and the students’ attitudes towards immigrant rights, taking into account the possible clustering effect of schools, we applied multilevel analysis. We discuss obtained results both in general and in the light of the existing cross-national differences.

U kontekstu kolektivnog djelovanja ne nedostaje empirijskih argumenata koji govore u prilog vaţnosti emocija poput ljutnje, gaĊenja ili prijezira, zbog ĉega su navedene emocije uvrštene i u velik broj teorijskih modela radikalizacije. S druge strane, kognitivni kapaciteti i stilovi u modelima radikalizacije javljaju se rjeĊe, dok empirijskih provjera njihovog doprinosa radikaliziranim stavovima, namjerama ili ponašanjima gotovo i nema. Stoga, polazeći od dvoprocesnih teorija viših kognitivnih procesa, ovim istraţivanjem ţeljeli smo provjeriti postoji li odnos izmeĊu sklonosti sustavnom promišljanju (odnosno, sklonosti oslanjanja na kognitivne procese tipa 2) i radikaliziranih ponašajnih namjera usmjerenih prema spreĉavanju štetnih politika, kao i to moderira li sklonost sustavnom promišljanju odnos izmeĊu emocija i radikaliziranih ponašajnih namjera. Kako bismo to uĉinili, proveli smo istraţivanje na online uzorku punoljetnih graĊana Hrvatske, nacionalno reprezentativnom s obzirom na dob i spol. Uzorak je saĉinjavalo 504 odraslih graĊana (prosjeĉne dobi od 44 godina ; 54% ţena). Nakon provjere faktorskih struktura primijenjenih instrumenata (ljestvice aktivistiĉkih i ekstremistiĉkih namjera (ARIS), testa kognitivne refleksivnosti (CRT), unipolarne ljestvica samoprocjene doţivljenih emocija kod percepcije grupne relativne deprivacije), provedene korelacijske i regresijske analize ukazale su na postojanje pozitivnog odnosa izmeĊu emocija i radikaliziranih ponašajnih namjera, na naĉin da su osobe koje doţivljavaju intenzivnije neugodne emocije izraţavale intenzivnije radikalizirane namjere, te negativnog odnosa izmeĊu sklonosti sustavnom promišljanju i radikaliziranih ponašajnih namjera, pri ĉemu su osobe sklonije sustavnom promišljanju izraţavale nešto slabije radikalizirane namjere. TakoĊer, regresijskim je analizama utvrĊeno da odnos emocija i radikaliziranih ponašajnih namjera ne ovisi o razini sustavnog promišljanja pojedinca.

Social dominance orientation represents a well- known and relevant concept in social psychology. This study focused on testing the psychometric properties of its relatively novel operationalization (SDO7 – short form, Ho et al., 2015) on a youth sample. Data on more than 15 thousand 16-17 years old high-school students from nine countries (Germany, Spain, United Kingdom, Latvia, Croatia, Slovakia, Georgia, Turkey and India) used in this study were collected within the project CHIEF. Multiple plausible models were tested on the overall sample using confirmatory factor analysis, with the two-factor model with correlated residuals yielding the highest fit to data. However, factors of this model reflected the wording direction of items, not the originally developed factors related to social dominance and anti-egalitarianism. Furthermore, the model we obtained was tested using multi-group confirmatory factor analyses and achieved partial strong invariance, implying the consistency of obtained factor structure, loadings, and (at least some) intercepts across countries. Potential causes and implications of these findings are discussed.

This report presents the main findings of cross- country correlational analyses of CHIEF survey data of non-probability purposive samples of secondary students from nine countries: the UK, Germany, and Spain (Catalonia), Latvia, Slovakia, Croatia, Georgia, Turkey, and India. In the current report, our focus is on cross-national comparison of a joint set of individual-level (student and family characteristics) and contextual characteristics (school/location characteristics) as correlates of young peoples’ cultural literacy, cultural participation, and intercultural attitudes based on the quantitative analyses of the cross-national CHIEF survey dataset.

Uslijed naglog širenja i nepostojanja lijeka, pandemija COVID-19, posebice u svojim inicijalnim fazama, brzo je postala predmetom brojnih društvenih rasprava. Pritom je značajan dio tih rasprava bio usmjeren i na propitkivanje postojanja virusa COVID-19, njegovog uzroka i toga tko od njega ima korist. Tako je inicijalni nedostatak informacija o virusu otvorio vrata brojnim teorijama zavjere, dok su svakodnevni pesimistični izvještaji o broju umrlih predstavljali neizbježan dio informativnog programa različitih medija. U takvoj, teškoj situaciji čiji kraj inicijalno nije bilo moguće predvidjeti, od građana se očekivalo pridržavanje preventivnih mjera. Stoga smo analizom podataka prikupljenih na kvotnom uzorku 501 odraslih građana Hrvatske, nacionalno reprezentativnom s obzirom na spol i dob, provjerili kako su vjerovanje u teorije zavjera o COVID-19 te percipirana kontrola nad ponašanjem bili povezani sa samoiskazanim pridržavanjem COVID-19 preventivnih mjera (nošenje maske, izbjegavanje fizičkog kontakta, pranje ruku). Istraživački nacrt bio je korelacijski, dok je prikupljanje podataka provedeno online. Rezultati su ukazali na nezavisne linearne odnose vjerovanja u teorije zavjere i gubitka kontrole s preventivnim mjerama: osobe koje su manje vjerovale u teorije zavjere i u vlastitu kontrolu nad situacijom, nezavisno, više su se pridržavale preventivnih mjera. Pritom se vjerovanje u kontrolu nad situacijom nije pokazalo povezanim s nošenjem maski, kao ni interakcija vjerovanja u teorije zavjere i vjerovanja u kontrolu nad situacijom u objašnjavanju pridržavanja preventivnih mjera.

This report presents the main findings resulting from CHIEF online surveys among secondary students (N = 2148) and school representatives from a non- probability purposive sample of 28 Croatian secondary schools. The results of conducted analyses suggest that cultural participation, which exposes students to foreign and different cultures, customs, and people, together with more stable individual orientations, could facilitate students’ intercultural orientations and endorsement of European values.

Znanstveno-popularni članak donosi zanimljivi pregled spoznaja u vezi s fenomenom prekomjernog samopouzdanja. Autorica raspravlja o svakodnevnim anegdotalnim primjerima koje potkrepljuje istraživačkim nalazima te stavlja u širi teorijski okvir.

Znanstveno-popularni članak donosi zanimljivi pregled spoznaja u vezi s fenomenom motiviranog rezoniranja. Autorica raspravlja o svakodnevnim anegdotalnim primjerima koje potkrepljuje istraživačkim nalazima te stavlja u širi teorijski okvir. Ovaj rad može poslužiti kao početni korak u pobuđivanju interesa za navedenu temu.

Tijekom prvog vala pandemije koronavirusa COVID-19, u razdoblju od 27. travnja do 4. svibnja 2020. proveli smo istraživanje na online uzorku punoljetnih hrvatskih građana temeljenog na kvotama spola i dobi. Prikupljeni podaci dio su velikog međunarodnog istraživanja o sociopsihološkim aspektima pandemije koronavirusa (COVID-19), uz sudjelovanje oko 60 zemalja. Istraživanjem se htjelo zahvatiti širok raspon sociodemografskih obilježja, društveno relevantnih stavova, osobina ličnosti, kvalitete života i drugih individualnih karakteristika kako bi se ispitala njihova uloga u objašnjavanju stavova i ponašanja u vezi s pandemijom koronavirusa COVID-19. Rezultati ukazuju da građani prihvaćaju sve anketom obuhvaćene oblike odgovornog ponašanja, odnosno fizičkog udaljavanja i izbjegavanja kontakata i pojačane higijene te u prosjeku snažno podržavaju i poduzete epidemiološke mjere u Hrvatskoj. Analitičko mišljenje, indeksirano kognitivnom refleksivnošću i razmišljanjem otvorenog uma povezano je s manjom sklonošću različitim teorijama zavjera o porijeklu i prirodi nastanka koronavirusa. Rezultati ukazuju na izostanak povezanosti analitičkog mišljenja s ponašanjima fizičkog udaljavanja i izbjegavanja kontakata tijekom pandemije, kao i s podrškom mjerama nacionalnog stožera. S druge strane, sklonost pojačanoj higijeni tijekom pandemije pokazala se negativno povezanom s kognitivnom refleksivnošću, dok veza s razmišljanjem otvorenog uma nije utvrđena. Očekivano, osobe sklonije vjerovanjima u teorije zavjera u vezi s COVID-19 iskazuju manju podršku epidemiološkim mjerama te manje izbjegavanje fizičkih kontakata iako ne i pojačane higijene. Osobito je zanimljiv nalaz da svijest o mogućim ekonomskim troškovima ograničavajućih mjera, odnosno stavovi hrvatskih građana o negativnim ekonomskim, te dugoročno neizravnim dodatnim zdravstvenim posljedicama, u odnosu na izravnije zdravstvene posljedice nije povezana s političkom i ekonomskom orijentacijom građana, a niti s indikatorima analitičkog mišljenja. S druge strane, povezana je sa sklonošću teorijama zavjere. Općenito, nalazi ne ukazuju na politizaciju i polarizaciju građana kontekstu stavova i ponašanja u vezi s pandemijom COVID-19.

Purpose: Our aim is to investigate which issues are ideologically partisan and examine the relative roles of ideology and cognitive sophistication in acceptance of scientific facts and related forms of empirical evidence. Background: There has been deepening concern about ideological polarization in public attitudes toward different scientific issues. It is undeniable that divergence in attitudes and beliefs is part of a democratic society, but when significant sections of society reject empirical and scientific knowledge and governments make important political decisions based on questionable "science", the detrimental consequences for public policy and social well-being are never far away. Methods: Correlational study based on an ongoing online survey with a convenient Croatian adult sample of approximately 500 individuals aged 18-75 years. Investigated variables encompass multiple science-related beliefs (from anthropogenic global warming, heritability to antibiotics), two ideological factors (socio-political orientation, religiosity) and two indicators of cognitive sophistication (cognitive reflection, open-minded thinking). To address our aim, we have planned to conduct correlational and multivariate regression analyses of science attitudes as dependent variables and ideological factors and measure of cognitive sophistication as predictors. Results and conclusions: The results are expected to highlight the complexity of the factors that determine the acceptance of particular scientific facts and contribute to elucidating why people hold anti-science beliefs and what factors lead to a more polarized society. We will discuss obtained results in light of the two competing accounts referred to as expressive rationality (or identity-protective reasoning) account and bounded rationality account.

Existing studies indicate the possibility of different relations between national and global identifications with out-group attitudes and attitudes towards human rights. While the effect of national (and European) identification on these attitudes could depend on exclusive definitions of the identity content, identification with humanity is more universally related to positive outgroup attitudes and endorsement of human rights. In this study we will focus on the context of young peoples’ support for immigrant rights with the primary goal of exploring the effects of national identification, European identification and identification with all humanity on young peoples’ support for immigrant rights. The study is based on online cross-cultural survey data collected among secondary students in European and Asian countries participating in the EU Horizon 2020 CHIEF project. The data will be analysed by multi-group structural equation modelling. Results will be discussed in terms of universal relations between different level identifications and out-group attitudes as well as cultural differences in the meaning and possible consequences of national and global identifications.

The CHIEF project (Cultural Heritage and Identities of Europe's Future, EU Horizon2020) investigates young people’s cultural literacy as a process that takes place in diverse educational environments (e.g. schools, families, civic society, (social) media), framed within national and supra-national policy agendas, and shaped by the intergenerational dynamics of re-production of cultural practices, values and attitudes. Its methodological approach involves qualitative and quantitative approaches, as well as, participatory action research (PAR) and ethnographic studies. The main quantitative element of the project is the survey of cc 2000 secondary school students in 30 schools in each of 9 project countries ; seven European (UK, Latvia, Croatia, Georgia, Spain, Slovakia, India, Germany) and two non- European (Turkey, India). The survey focus is on cultural participation among young people, their cultural literacy on national/European cultural heritage, different aspects of inter-cultural dialogue and the importance of ‘European values’ as well individual and contextual (school level) determinants of these phenomena. This poster will describe challenges in developing common survey questionnaire and national sampling designs, necessary adaptations to specific political, cultural or demographical context in some of the countries. Additionally, the results regarding the cross-cultural validity and equivalence testing for applied and newly developed instruments based on pilot survey conducted in April 2019 will be presented.

Praznovjerje je zanimljiv fenomen koji perzistira i u suvremenom društvu. No, usprkos određenim istraživačkim nastojanjima, cjelovita slika praznovjerja je nejasna te ostaje veliki prostor za opsežnija istraživanja, osobito u Hrvatskoj. Na tom tragu, cilj ovog istraživanja bila je analiza udjela kognitivnih čimbenika i osobina ličnosti u objašnjavanju praznovjerja. U istraživanju su sudjelovali kandidati koji su prolazili standardan selekcijski postupak kompanije koja se bavi poštanskim i logističkim uslugama (N=365). Kao mjera praznovjerja korištena je Skala praznovjerja od 13 čestica koju su konstuirali Toplakova, West i Stanovich. Kognitivni faktori obuhvaćeni istraživanjem bili su mjere općih i verbalnih sposobnosti, numeričke sposobnosti, kognitivne refleksivnosti (CRT) i stila razmišljanja aktivno otvorenog uma (AOT). Za mjerenje osobina ličnosti korišten je Upitnik šesnaest faktora ličnosti, odnosno opći faktori ekstraverzije, anksioznosti, nesentimentalnosti, neovisnosti i samokontrole. Usto, uzete su i obzir i dvije čestice u vezi s vjerovanjem u nadnaravne duhovne sile ili bića te stavom o štetnosti cijepljenja djece. Korelacijska analiza pokazala je da je praznovjerje u korelaciji sa svim kognitivnim mjerama, izuzev kognitivne refleksivnosti, i to u negativnom smjeru. Kad je riječ o osobinama ličnosti, praznovjerje je bilo u pozitivnoj korelaciji s anksioznošću, dok je korelacija s ekstraverzijom i samokontrolom bila negativna. S praznovjerjem je pozitivno koreliralo i vjerovanje u nadnaravne duhovne sile ili bića te stav da cijepljenje djece ima neželjene posljedice. U konačnici je analizirana relativna prediktivna valjanost navedenih mjera u objašnjavanju praznovjerja. Regresijskim modelom objašnjeno je ukupno 30% varijance (korigirano 27%) praznovjerja. Pritom najveći samostalan doprinos u objašnjavanju rezultata na skali praznovjerja imao je stil razmišljanja aktivno otvorenog uma, koji je ujedno bio i jedini značajan prediktor od kognitivnih faktora. U domeni ličnosti samokontrola je pokazala značajan samostalni doprinos u objašnjavanju praznovjera, a usto su se i vjerovanje u nadnaravne duhovne sile ili bića te stav da cijepljenje djece ima neželjene posljedice također izdvojili kao značajni prediktori. Ovi nalazi djelomice su u skladu s rezultatima dosadašnjih istraživanja, ali prije svega ukazuju na potrebu za daljnjim istraživanjima kako bi se fenomen praznovjerja adekvatno opisao i objasnio.

Test kognitivne refleksivnosti (CRT, Frederick, 2005) konstruiran je za mjerenje tendencije da se nadjača snažan intuitivan, ali pogrešan odgovor, te da se rješavač dodatno angažira u razmatranju postavljenog problema i iznađe točan normativan odgovor. CRT tako predstavlja zanimljivu mjeru kognitivne škrtosti unutar teorijskog okvira većine dualnih teorija obrade informacija. Dosadašnja istraživanja ukazuju na to da je CRT značajan prediktor donošenja nepristranih prosudbi i racionalnih odluka u različitim kontekstima. No, iako je relativno često korišten u istraživanjima rasuđivanja i odlučivanja, njegov opseg i karakteristike nisu dovoljno istražene. Cilj ovog istraživanja bio je utvrđivanje latentnih dimenzija u pozadini uratka u CRT-u te njegove povezanosti s drugim kognitivnim mjerama. U istraživanju su sudjelovali kandidati (N = 132) koji su prolazili selekcijski postupak u jednoj organizaciji u vlasništvu države. Primijenjene su dvije verzije CRT-a (originalna i proširena, s pridodanih 9 čestica) te su ispitane osnovne psihometrijske karakteristike testa i njegova latentna struktura. Nadalje, provedena je analiza povezanosti dvaju verzija CRT-a s mjerama kognitivnih sposobnosti (D70, TOS/V, test numeričkih sposobnosti – eng. numeracy), Cattelovog primarnog faktora rasuđivanja (16 PF - faktor B) i kognitivnim stilom otvorenog razmišljanja (eng. actively open-minded thinking – AOT). Rezultati su pokazali relativno dobra psihometrijska svojstava originalnog CRT-a, kao i proširene verzije. Obje verzije su se pokazale kao teški testovi s pozitivno asimetričnom distribucijom točnih rezultata. Netočni – intuitivni odgovori i točni odgovori pokazali su se kao dominantni odgovori na 11 od 12 čestica. Eksploratora faktorska analiza dvaju verzija CRT-a upućuje na jednofaktorsko rješenje koje je interpretirano kao šira latentna dimenzija kognitivne refleksivnosti. Pouzdanost originalnog CRT-a, kao i proširene verzije, pokazala se zadovoljavajućom. Također, potvrđena je i povezanost s mjerama kognitivnih sposobnosti, Cattelovim faktorom rasuđivanja, te otvorenim razmišljanjem kao kognitivnim stilom (AOT).

Iako posjedujemo sposobnosti brzog i efikasnog razmišljanja, te u nekim situacijama rutinski rješavamo probleme u kojima nijedan do sada umjetno stvoren sustav nije tako učinkovit, ne znači da naš mozak nema velikih ograničenja. Naime, podložni smo raznim kognitivnim pristranostima – iritantnim pogreškama u našem razmišljanju koje često dovode do upitnih odluka i pogrešnih zaključaka. Od 1960-ih istraživanja potvrđuju ono s čime se često susrećemo u životu, a to je da ljudi dobrih kognitivnih sposobnosti ponavljano donose loše prosudbe i odluke. Naše razmišljanje pokazuje sustavno i često predvidljivo odstupanje od formalnih normi kao što su zakoni logike, teorije vjerojatnosti ili aksiomi racionalnog izbora. Zašto je to tako? Jesmo li samo loši kad je riječ o brojevima i vjerojatnostima ili postoji neki psihološki mehanizam u pozadini? Prvi korak u osiguravanju kvalitetnijih odluka jest osvješćivanje vlastitih sklonosti i ograničenja kako bismo mogli poraditi na prepoznavanju situacija u kojima će se pogreške vjerojatno pojaviti.

Test kognitivne refleksivnosti dizajniran je za mjerenje tendencije da se nadjača snažan intuitivan, ali pogrešan odgovor i da se dodatno angažira u refleksiji o postavljenom problemu te iznađe točan odgovor. Iako relativno često korišten u istraživanjima rasuđivanja i odlučivanja, njegov opseg i detaljnije karakteristike nisu dovoljno istražene. Cilj ovog istraživanja jest preliminarna analiza valjanosti različitih verzija CRT-a i različitih načina bodovanja CRT-a. U istraživanju su sudjelovali kandidati koji su prolazili standardan selekcijski postupak kompanije koja se bavi poštanskim i logističkim uslugama. Primijenjen je originalni test kognitivne refleksivnosti (CRT3) i verzija CRT-a od četiri dodatne čestice, te su ispitane osnovne psihometrijske karakteristike CRT3, CRT4 te duže verzije testa (CRT7) dobivene kombinacijom triju originalnih i četiriju dodatnih čestica. Primijenjena su četiri načina bodovanja: standardan (CRT-standard) ; proporcija intuitivnih odgovora u ukupnom broju netočnih odgovora (CRT- proporcija intuitivnih) ; bodovanje samo neintuitivnih odgovora (neovisno o točnosti ; CRT-refleksija) ; proporcija točnih odgovora u ukupnom broju neintuitivnih odgovora (CRT-izračun). Provedena je korelacijska analiza kojom je ispitana povezanosti između različitih tehnika bodovanja mjere kognitivne refleksivnosti, kao i njihove povezanosti s mjerama kognitivnih sposobnosti (D70 i TOS-V) te Cattelovog primarnog faktora rasuđivanja (faktor B Upitnika šesnaest faktora). Sve tri verzije CRT-a pokazale su se kao teški testovi s pozitivno asimetričnom distribucijom točnih rezultata. Intuitivni odgovori predstavljaju modalan odgovor na svakoj od 7 čestica izuzev jedne. Kada se raspravlja o različitim tehnikama bodovanja uratka na CRT-u, rezultati su u skladu s dosadašnjim istraživanjima koja ukazuju da su CRT-standard i CRT-refleksija (kao mjera invertna CRT-proporcija intuitivnih) značajno povezani. Također, mjera CRT- proporcija intuitivnih visoko korelira s mjerom CRT- refleksija, ali je u gotovo nepostojećoj korelaciji s CRT-standard. Ovaj obrazac korelacija daje početne dokaze o mogućim razlikama u strukturi i opsegu navedenih mjera. CRT-refleksija i CRT-izračun u značajnim su korelacijama s CRT- standard, ali u gotovo nepostojećim međusobnim korelacijama (uz izuzetak kod CRT7 – značajna, ali niska povezanost). To je također u skladu s istraživanjima koja sugeriraju da rješavanje CRT problema uključuje dva uvelike nepovezana, ali podjednako važna koraka koji zahtijevaju različite sposobnosti. Za uspješno rješavanje CRT problema u prvom koraku potrebna je refleksija kako bi se prepoznala pogrešnost intuitivnih odgovora, a u drugom koraku i sposobnost izračunavanja točnog odgovora, pri čemu te sposobnosti mogu biti međusobno neovisne. Usto potvrđena je i povezanost mjera CRT-standard i CRT-izračun s mjerama kognitivnih sposobnosti te Cattelovim faktorom rasuđivanja, dok nije dobivena povezanost CRT- refleksija s mjerama kognitivnih sposobnosti te Cattelovim faktorom rasuđivanja (uz izuzetak niske, ali značajne korelacije TOS-V i CRT4- refleksije).

Općenito, ljudi pokazuju snažnu sklonost da svoje prosudbe temelje na brzim, intuitivnim dojmovima. Naime, u razmišljanju i donošenju odluka često koristimo mentalne prečace, tzv. heuristike - kognitivne procese koji zahtijevaju malo kognitivnog napora, ne ometaju druge procese i mogu se odvijati paralelno s njima. Iako takvo razmišljanje može biti vrlo efikasno i korisno, ono može uzrokovati pristranosti u rasuđivanju rezultat čega u konačnici mogu biti loše odluke i posljedice. Prekomjerno samopouzdanje, poteškoće u predviđanju što će nas usrećiti u budućnosti, poteškoće u procjenama vjerojatnosti te brojne druge pristranosti i sustavne pogreške – sve to moguće je razumjeti samo ako znamo kako dva sustava, odnosno tipa procesiranja funkcioniraju zajedno prilikom rasuđivanja i donošenja odluka.

Cilj ovog istraživanja bio je ispitati kako spol, vrsta veze i tri dimenzije evolucijski važnih karakteristika potencijalnih partnera (toplina/pouzdanost, atraktivnost/vitalnost, status/resursi) međudjeluju pri izboru hipotetskih partnera. U istraživanju je sudjelovalo 211 studenata Zagrebačkog sveučilišta, i to 101 žena te 102 muškaraca. Koristeći čestice kratke verzije Skala idealnih standarda za partnera (Ideal Standards Scales ; Fletcher et al., 1999) konstruirana su tri profila hipotetskih osoba, a zadatak sudionika je bio procijeniti bi li te osobe uzeli u obzir kao potencijalne intimne partnere na skali od sedam stupnjeva. Provedena je složena analiza varijance s ponovljenim mjerenjima, pri čemu su tri nezavisne varijable bile: spol, vrsta veze za koju su hipotetske osobe bile uzimane u obzir (kratkoročna/dugoročna) i dimenzije karakteristika hipotetskih osoba (ponavljajuća mjera). Nisu dobivene pretpostavljene spolne razlika u uzimanju u obzir hipotetskih osoba kao potencijalnih partnera, neovisno o vrsti veze i njihovim dimenzijama karateristika. Nije potvrđeno postojanje spolnih razlika u strategijama pri odabiru partnera. Potvrdilo se očekivanje da će muškarci pri odabiru partnera (neovisno o vrsti veze) vitalne/atraktivne osobe preferirati u odnosu na tople/pouzdane osobe kao i u odnosu na osobe sa statusom/resursima. Međutim, nije potvrđeno predviđanje da će žene preferirati tople/pouzdane osobe i osobe sa statusom/resursima u odnosu na vitalne/atraktivne osobe, odnosno pokazalo se da žene pri izboru partnera (neovisno o vrsti veze) jednako vrednuju sve tri dimenzije karakteristika. Također, suprotno očekivanjima, muškarci i žene se međusobno ne razlikuju u uzimanju u obzir vitalnih/atraktivnih osoba kao potencijalnih partnera (neovisno o vrsti veze), kao što se međusobno ne razlikuju ni u izboru toplih/pouzdanih osoba, a također ni u odabiru osoba sa statusom/resursima. Potvrđena je hipoteza da će studenti, neovisno o spolu, tople/pouzdane osobe te osobe sa statusom/resursima više uzimati u obzir kao partnere za dugoročnu vezu, dok će osobe koje su atraktivne/vitalne više uzimati u obzir kao kratkoročne seksualne partnere. Predviđena interakcija spola, vrste veze i dimenzija karakteristika hipotetskih osoba pri odabiru partnera nije se pokazala statistički značajnom, tj. spol dodatno ne moderira interakciju vrste veze i dimenzija karakteristika hipotetskih osoba pri odabiru partnera.

At the beginning of 2020, COVID-19 became a global problem. Despite all the efforts to emphasize the relevance of preventive measures, not everyone adhered to them. Thus, learning more about the characteristics determining attitudinal and behavioral responses to the pandemic is crucial to improving future interventions. In this study, we applied machine learning on the multinational data collected by the International Collaboration on the Social and Moral Psychology of COVID-19 (N = 51,404) to test the predictive efficacy of constructs from social, moral, cognitive, and personality psychology, as well as socio-demographic factors, in the attitudinal and behavioral responses to the pandemic. The results point to several valuable insights. Internalized moral identity provided the most consistent predictive contribution—individuals perceiving moral traits as central to their self-concept reported higher adherence to preventive measures. Similar results were found for morality as cooperation, symbolized moral identity, self-control, open-mindedness, and collective narcissism, while the inverse relationship was evident for the endorsement of conspiracy theories. However, we also found a non-neglible variability in the explained variance and predictive contributions with respect to macro-level factors such as the pandemic stage or cultural region. Overall, the results underscore the importance of morality-related and contextual factors in understanding adherence to public health recommendations during the pandemic., PNAS Nexus, 1 (3), ISSN:2752-6542

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected all domains of human life, including the economic and social fabric of societies. One of the central strategies for managing public health throughout the pandemic has been through persuasive messaging and collective behaviour change. To help scholars better understand the social and moral psychology behind public health behaviour, we present a dataset comprising of 51,404 individuals from 69 countries. This dataset was collected for the International Collaboration on Social & Moral Psychology of COVID-19 project (ICSMP COVID-19). This social science survey invited participants around the world to complete a series of moral and psychological measures and public health attitudes about COVID-19 during an early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic (between April and June 2020). The survey included seven broad categories of questions: COVID-19 beliefs and compliance behaviours; identity and social attitudes; ideology; health and well-being; moral beliefs and motivation; personality traits; and demographic variables. We report both raw and cleaned data, along with all survey materials, data visualisations, and psychometric evaluations of key variables. ispartof: SCIENTIFIC DATA vol:10 issue:1 ispartof: location:England status: published