Search

The treatment of choice for severe rheumatic mitral stenosis is balloon mitral valvuloplasty (BMV). Numerous predictors of immediate and long-term procedural success have been described. The aims of this study were to describe our experience with BMV over the last decade and to evaluate predictors of long-term event-free survival.Medical records were retrospectively analyzed of patients who underwent BMV between 2009 and 2021. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, mitral valve replacement (MVR), and repeat BMV. Long-term event-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier curves. Logistic regression was used to create a multivariate model to assess pre-procedural predictors of the primary outcome.A total of 96 patients underwent BMV during the study period. The primary outcome occurred in 36 patients during 12-year follow-up: 1 (1%) patient underwent re-BMV, 28 (29%) had MVR, and 8 (8%) died. Overall event-free survival was 62% at 12 years. On multivariate analysis, pre-procedural left atrial volume index (LAVI)80 mL/m² had a significant independent influence on event-free survival, as did previous mitral valve procedure and systolic pulmonary arterial pressure above 50 mmHg.Despite being a relatively low-volume center, excellent short and long-term results were demonstrated, with event-free survival rates consistent with previous studies from high-volume centers. LAVI independently predicted long-term event-free survival.

Patients with rapidly deteriorating clinical status due to severe aortic stenosis are often referred for expedited transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Data regarding the outcome of such interventions is limited. We aimed to evaluate the outcome of patients undergoing expedited TAVR.Data were derived from the Israeli Multicenter Registry.Subjects were divided into two groups based on procedure urgency: patients who were electively hospitalized for the procedure (N = 3140) and those who had an expedited TAVR (N = 142). Procedural and periprocedural complication rates were significantly higher among patients with an expedited indication for TAVR compared to those having an elective procedure: valve malposition 4.6% versus 0.6% (p lt; 0.001), procedural cardiopulmonary resuscitation 4.3% versus 1.0% (p = 0.007), postprocedure myocardial infarction 2.0% versus 0.4% (p = 0.002), and stage 3 acute kidney injury 3.0% versus 1.1%, (p lt; 0.001). Patients with expedited indication for TAVR had significantly higher in hospital mortality (5.6% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.003). Kaplan-Meier's survival analysis showed that patients undergoing expedited TAVR had higher 3-year mortality rates compared to patients undergoing an elective TAVR procedure (p lt; 0.001). Multivariate analysis found that patients with expedited indication had fourfolds increased risk of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio: 4.07, p = 0.001), and nearly twofolds increased risk of mortality at 3-year (hazard ratio: 1.69, p = 0.001) compared to those having an elective procedure.Patients with expedited indications for TAVR suffer from poor short- and long-term outcomes. It is important to characterize and identify these patients before the deterioration to perform TAVR in a fast-track pathway to minimize their procedural risk.

Contains fulltext : 283507.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) Background: Data to support the routine use of embolic protection devices for stroke prevention during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are controversial. Identifying patients at high risk for peri-procedural cerebrovascular events may facilitate effective patient selection for embolic protection devices during TAVR. Aim: To generate a risk score model for stratifying TAVR patients according to peri-procedural cerebrovascular events risk. Methods and results: A total of 8779 TAVR patients from 12 centers worldwide were included. Peri-procedural cerebrovascular events were defined as an ischemic stroke or a transient ischemic attack occurring ≤24 h from TAVR. The peri-procedural cerebrovascular events rate was 1.4% (n = 127), which was independently associated with 1-year mortality (hazards ratio (HR) 1.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-2.98, p < 0.028). The TASK risk score parameters were history of stroke, use of a non-balloon expandable valve, chronic kidney disease, and peripheral vascular disease, and each parameter was assigned one point. Each one-point increment was associated with a significant increase in peri-procedural cerebrovascular events risk (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.56-2.45, p < 0.001). The TASK score was dichotomized into very-low, low, intermediate, and high (0, 1, 2, 3-4 points, respectively). The high-risk TASK score group (OR 5.4, 95% CI 2.06-14.16, p = 0.001) was associated with a significantly higher risk of peri-procedural cerebrovascular events compared with the low TASK score group. Conclusions: The proposed novel TASK risk score may assist in the pre-procedural risk stratification of TAVR patients for peri-procedural cerebrovascular events.

Aims To evaluate the effect of an intercurrent non-coronary illness on the management and outcome of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Methods and results Consecutive hospitalized patients with a primary diagnosis of NSTEMI between August 2008 and December 2019 at Sheba Medical Center. All patients’ records were reviewed for the presence of a non-coronary precipitating event (NCPE): a major intercurrent acute non-coronary illness or condition, either cardiac or non-cardiac. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Cox regression with interaction analysis was applied. Final study population comprised 6491 patients, of whom 2621 (40%) had NCPEs. Patients with NCPEs were older (77 vs. 69 years) and more likely to have comorbidities. The most prevalent event was infection (35%, n = 922). During a median follow-up of 30 months, 2529 patients died. Patients with NCPEs were 43% more likely to die during follow-up in a multivariable model (95% CI: 1.31–1.55). Invasive strategy was associated with a 55% lower mortality among patients without NCPE and only 44% among patients with NCPE (P for interaction < 0.001). Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was associated with a 20% lower mortality in patients without NCEP and a non-significant mortality difference among patients with NCPE (P for interaction = 0.014). Sub-analysis by the specific NCPE showed the highest mortality risk among patients with infectious precipitant. The lower mortality associated with invasive strategy was not observed in this subgroup. Conclusion Among NSTEMI patients, the presence of an NCPE is associated with poor survival and modifies the effect of management strategies.

Mesenteric ischemia is a rare but lethal complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We present a challenging case of an 80-year-old man who had abdominal pain few hours following TAVR. Repeated abdominal and pelvic imaging showed no vascular obstruction, but exploratory laparoscopy revealed a necrotic bowel. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.), Graphical abstract

We aimed to validate a new scoring system based on extent of cardiac damage for risk stratification in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in a real-world cohort and to examine the addition of baseline albumin in risk assessment.We investigated 2608 patients undergoing TAVR. Subjects were divided into five groups based on their echocardiography findings. Patients were further assessed by incorporating baseline albumin. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that each increase in stage was associated with significant increased risk of 1-year mortality (HR 1.37, 95%CI 1.23-1.54, p .001). Among patients at increased stage (3-4), incorporation of baseline of albumin identified the highest risk group, such that each 1 decrement in albumin levels was associated with more than triple increase in mortality among patients at stage 3 and 4 (HR 2.77, 95% CI 1.48-5.18, p-value = .001).Cardiac damage classification is validated in a real-world cohort of patients undergoing TAVR. Incorporation of low baseline albumin may further identify patients at the highest risk group.We evaluated 2608 patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in order to validate a new scoring system dividing patients in to 5 stages (0-4) based on extent of cardiac damage. Patients were further assessed by incorporating baseline albumin. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that each increase in stage was associated with significant increased risk of 1-year mortality. Furthermore, among patients at increased stage (3-4), incorporation of baseline of albumin identified the highest risk group, such that each 1 decrement in albumin levels was associated with more than triple increase in mortality among patients at stage 3 and 4.

Background In contrast to surgical aortic valve replacement, left ventricle (LV) hypertrophy (LVH) had not been clearly associated with mortality following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of patients enrolled in the Israeli multicenter TAVR registry for whom preprocedural LV mass index (LVMI) data were available. Patients were divided into categories according to LVMI: normal LVMI and mild, moderate, and severe LVH. Mild LVH was regarded as the reference group. Additionally, LV geometry patterns were examined (concentric and eccentric LVH, and concentric remodeling). Results The cohort consisted of 1,559 patients, 46.5% male, with a mean age of 82.2 (±6.8) years and mean LVMI of 121 (±29) g/m2. Rates of normal LVMI and mild, moderate, and severe LVH were 31% (n = 485), 21% (n = 322), 18% (n = 279), and 30% (n = 475), respectively. Three-year mortality rates for normal LVMI and mild, moderate, and severe LVH were 19.8%, 18.3%, 23.7%, and 24.4%, respectively. Compared to mild LVH, moderate LVH and severe LVH were independently associated with an increased risk for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.58, 95% CI 1.15-2.18, P = .005; HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.1-1.95, P = .009; respectively). Concentric LVH was independently associated with a decreased risk for mortality compared to normal LV geometry (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.63-0.89, P = .001). Compared to concentric LVH, eccentric LVH was independently associated with a 33% increased risk for mortality (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.11-1.60, P = .002). Conclusions Mild concentric LVH confers a protective effect among patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR. However, hypertrophy becomes maladaptive, and an increased baseline LVMI, eccentric pattern particularly, may be associated with all-cause mortality in this population.

Background: Conscious sedation (CS) has been used successfully to treat patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and as such is considered the standard anesthesia method. The local anesthesia (LA) only approach may be feasible and safe thanks to improvements in operators’ experience. Objective: To evaluate differences between LA only versus CS approaches on short- and long-term outcomes among patients undergoing TAVI. Methods: We performed a propensity score analysis on 1096 patients undergoing TAVI for severe AS. Two hundred and seventy-four patients in the LA group were matched in a ratio of 1:3 with 822 patients in the CS group. The primary outcome was a 1-year mortality rate. Secondary outcomes included procedural and peri-procedural complication rates and in-hospital mortality. Results: Patients in the CS group had significantly higher rates of grade 2–3 acute kidney injury and were more likely to have had new left bundle branch block and high-degree atrioventricular block. Patients who underwent TAVI under CS had significantly higher in-hospital and 1-year mortality rates compared to LA (1.6% vs. 0.0% p-value = 0.036 and 8.5% vs. 3.3% p-value = 0.004, respectively). Kaplan–Meier’s survival analysis showed that the cumulative probability of 1-year mortality was significantly higher among subjects undergoing CS compared to patients LA (p-value log-rank = 0.024). Regression analysis indicated that patients undergoing CS were twice more likely to die of at 1-year when compared to patients under LA (HR 2.18, 95%CI 1.09–4.36, p-value = 0.028). Conclusions: As compared to CS, the LA-only approach is associated with lower rates of peri-procedural complications and 1-year mortality rates.

Current guidelines suggest that an early invasive strategy should be considered for the treatment of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Although chronic kidney disease (CKD) is common among NSTEMI patients, these patients are under-represented in clinical trials, and data regarding their management are limited.The authors sought to evaluate the association between early invasive strategy and long-term survival among patients with NSTEMI and CKD.This was a retrospective analysis of 7,107 consecutive NSTEMI patients between 2008 and 2021. Patients were dichotomized into early (≤24 hours) and delayed invasive groups and stratified by kidney function. Inverse probability treatment weighting was used to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality.The final study population comprised 3,529 invasively treated patients with a median age of 66 years (IQR: 58-74 years), 1,837 (52%) of whom were treated early. There were 483 (14%) patients with at least moderate CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] 45 mL/min/1.73 mAmong NSTEMI patients, the association of early invasive strategy with long-term survival is modified by CKD and was not observed in patients with eGFR 45 mL/min/1.73 m

Background Current guidelines recommend an early invasive strategy for patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Purpose To evaluate whether early invasive strategy is associated with better outcome among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods Retrospective cohort analysis of consecutive patients with NSTEMI between 2008 and 2021. Glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) creatinine equation. Invasively treated patients were dichotomized into early ( Results Final study population comprised 7,107 NSTEMI patients, of whom 3,172 (45%) had eGFR Conclusion Among invasively treated NSTEMI patients, the benefit of early invasive strategy is modified by CKD, and limited to those with eGFR ≥45 ml/min/1.73m2. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Background: A small proportion of patients in need of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are not suitable for the transfemoral approach due to peripheral artery disease. Alternative TAVR approaches are associated with short- and long-term hazards. A novel technique of caval-aortic (transcaval) access for TAVR has been utilized as an alternative access technique.Aim: To compare safety and efficacy of transcaval access as compared to other alternative access (axillary or apical) for TAVR.Methods: A single-center, retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing alternative access for TAVR. Events were adjudicated according to VARC-2 criteria.Results: A total of 185 patients were included in the present analysis. Mean age was 81 years with a small majority for male gender (54%). Of the entire cohort, 20 patients (12%) underwent transcaval TAVR, and 165 patients (82%) underwent TAVR using alternative access. Overall, baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. General anesthesia was not utilized in transcaval patients; however, it was routinely used in nearly all alternative access patients. TAVR device success was comparable between the two groups (95%). Acute kidney injury occurred significantly less frequently among transcaval patients as compared to alternative access patients (5 vs. 12%, p = 0.05). Hospital stay was shorter for transcaval patients (6.3 days vs. 14.4; p < 0.001). No difference in early or 30-day mortality (10 vs. 7.9%, p = 0.74) was noted between groups.Conclusions: In patients who cannot undergo TAVR via the trans-femoral approach due to peripheral vascular disease, transcaval access is a safe approach as compared to other alternative access techniques, with lower risk of kidney injury and shorter hospital stay.

Transcatheter heart valve (THV) selection for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is crucial to achieve procedural success. Borderline aortic annulus size (BAAS), which allows a choice between two consecutive valve sizes, is a common challenge during device selection. In the present study, we evaluated TAVI outcomes in patients with BAAS according to THV size selection. We performed a retrospective study including patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and BAAS, measured by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), undergoing TAVI with self-expandable (SE) or balloon-expandable (BE) THV from the Israeli multicenter TAVI registry. TAVI outcomes were assessed according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2). Out of 2,352 patients with MDCT measurements, 598 patients with BAAS as defined for at least one THV type were included in the study. In BAAS patients treated with SE-THV, larger THV selection was associated with lower rate of paravalvular leak (PVL), compared to smaller THV (45.3% vs. 64.5%; pv = 0.0038). Regarding BE-THV, larger valve selection was associated with lower post-procedural transvalvular gradients compared to smaller THV (mean gradient: 9.9 ± 3.7mmHg vs. 12.5 ± 7.2mmHg; p = 0.019). Of note, rates of mortality, left bundle branch block, permanent pacemaker implantation, stroke, annular rupture and/or coronary occlusion did not differ between groups. BAAS is common among patients undergoing TAVI. Selection of a larger THV in these patients is associated with lower rates of PVL and better hemodynamic profile in patients implanted with SE and BE-THV, respectively, with no effect on procedural complications.

Objectives This study aimed to compare permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI) rates among patients undergoing Trans-catheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) with first generation (G1) versus second generation (G2) valves and the impact of PPMI on long-term mortality. Background PPMI is a known adverse event after TAVI. Recently, two novel iterations of valve designs of both the balloon expandable valves (BEV) and self-expanding valves (SEV) were introduced as a second generation valves. Methods All patients included in the Israeli multicenter TAVI registry were grouped according to valve type (BEV vs. SEV) and generation (G1 vs. G2). A comparison was made for clinical and outcome indices of patients undergoing TAVI with G1 and G2 in each of the valve systems. Results A total of 1377 patients were included. The incidence of PPMI did not differ between G1-BEV versus G2-BEV (15.3% vs. 17.4%; p = 0.598) nor between G1-SEV versus G2-SEV (23.4% vs. 20.3%; p = 0.302). Depth of implantation and complete right bundle branch block were independently associated with PPMI post-TAVI in both valve systems. PPMI was not associated with an increased risk for 2-year mortality. Conclusions The incidence of PPMI remains a relevant adverse event post-TAVI even when the newer generation valves are used. Since the predictors for PPMI are well established, a standardized approach for the management of conduction disorders is much needed.

Background Vascular complications during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) still pose a significant concern regarding procedural safety. Designated closure devices for large-bore vascular access are needed. Methods Patients undergoing TAVR were prospectively enrolled into the study. The InSeal vascular closure device (VCD) achieves hemostasis by utilizing a crescent-shaped nitinol scaffold covered by a biodegradable membrane, which is delivered at the arterial puncture site. The coprimary endpoints were predefined as hemostasis within 15 min following vessel access site closure and after activated clotting time falls below 200 s and the rate of related major vascular adverse events in first month. Results A total of 50 patients were prospectively enrolled into the study, with an average age of 80.8 ± 7.4 years and 62% males. Hemostasis with the Inseal VCD was achieved in 94% of the patients with average time-to-hemostasis of 51 ± 97 s. The rates of in-hospital vascular complications were 12% mostly driven by minor vascular complications (10%). Femoral artery stents were used in three patients due to failed hemostasis. Conclusions Initial clinical experience indicates that a novel, nitinol-based, large-bore vascular closure device is safe and effective in achieving hemostasis after TAVR.

Background: Data concerning transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with prior mitral surgery is limited and preliminary reports seem encouraging. We sought to describe TA...

Referral of low surgical risk (LSR) patients for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) becomes common in multiple tertiary centers, and clinical trial data for this population are not available to date. We performed a retrospective analysis on an Israeli multicenter registry. LSR and intermediate-high surgical risk (I-HSR) were defined by a Society of Thoracic Surgery score of4% and ≥4%, respectively. The cohort included 2336 patients (LSR n = 1198, I-HLR n = 1138). As compared with LSR, patients with I-HSR were older and had significantly higher rates of baseline comorbidities. Although devices success rates (94% vs 96%), paravalvular leak (3.5% vs 5.2%), and permanent pacemaker implantation (17.2 vs 18%) were comparable (p0.05 for all comparisons), the safety outcome at 1 month (12.7% vs 9.8%), procedural mortality (1.9% vs 0.6%), and mortality at 3 years (30.1% vs 16.1%) were higher in patients with I-HSR (p0.05 for all comparisons). In a subanalysis of patients with very LSR, comparable rates of device success and safety outcomes were observed, whereas mortality at 1 to 3 years was lower. In conclusion, although procedural outcomes were comparable between LSR and I-HSR TAVI patients, the rates of short- and long-term mortality, as well as the safety outcome, were lower in LSR patients.

While the combination of a small aortic valve area (AVA) and low mean gradient is frequently labeled 'low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis (AS)', there are two potential causes for this finding: underestimation of mean gradient and underestimation of AVA.In order to investigate the prevalence and causes of discordant echocardiographic findings in symptomatic patients with AS and normal left ventricular (LV) function, we evaluated 72 symptomatic patients with AS and normal LV function by comparing Doppler, invasive, computed tomography (CT) LV outflow tract (LVOT) area, and calcium score (CaSc).Thirty-six patients had discordant echocardiographic findings (mean gradient40 mmHg, AV area ≤ 1 cm²). Of those, 19 had discordant invasive measurements (true discordant [TD]) and 17 concordant (false discordant [FD]): In 12 of the FD the mean gradient was30 mmHg; technical pitfalls were found in 10 patients (no reliable right parasternal Doppler in 6). LVOT area by echocardiography or CT could not differentiate between concordants and discordants nor between TD and FD (p = NS). CaSc was similar in concordants and FD (p = 0.3), and it was higher in true concordants than in TD (p = 0.005). CaSc positive predictive value for the correct diagnosis of severe AS was 95% for concordants and 93% for discordants.Discordant echocardiographic findings are commonly found in patients with symptomatic AS. Underestimation of the true mean gradient due to technical difficulties is an important cause of these discrepant findings. LVOT area by echocardiography or CT cannot differentiate between TD and FD. In the absence of a reliable and compete multi-window Doppler evaluation, patients should undergo CaSc assessment.

The proposed 2020 Core Curriculum for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions aims to provide an updated European consensus that defines the level of experience and knowledge in the field of percutaneous cardiovascular intervention (PCI). It promotes homogenous education and training programmes among countries, and is the cornerstone of the new EAPCI certification, designed to support the recognition of competencies at the European level and the free movement of certified specialists in the European Community. It is based on a thorough review of the ESC guidelines and of the EAPCI textbook on percutaneous interventional cardiovascular medicine. The structure of the current core curriculum evolved from previous EAPCI core curricula and from the "2013 core curriculum of the general cardiologist"to follow the current ESC recommendations for core curricula. In most subject areas, there was a wide - if not unanimous - consensus among the task force members on the training required for the interventional cardiologist of the future. The document recommends that acquisition of competence in interventional cardiology requires at least two years of postgraduate training, in addition to four years devoted to cardiology. The first part of the curriculum covers general aspects of training and is followed by a comprehensive description of the specific components in 54 chapters. Each of the chapters includes statements of the objectives, and is further subdivided into the required knowledge, skills, behaviours, and attitudes.

OBJECTIVES Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) are associated with adverse outcomes in severe aortic stenosis (AS) patients. Our aim was to evaluate the association between ≥moderate TR and RV dysfunction on long-term mortality following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). METHODS A retrospective analysis of the Israeli multicenter TAVR registry among 4,344 consecutive patients, with all-cause mortality as the main outcome measure. RESULTS Echocardiographic assessment of TR grade and RV dysfunction was available for 3,733 and 1,850 patients, of whom ≥moderate TR and RV dysfunction was noted for 478(13%) and 78(4%), respectively. The mean follow-up time was 2.9 ± 2.3 years. In univariate models, ≥Moderate TR and ≥moderate RV dysfunction were associated with increased long-term mortality (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.24-1.69, p

Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve (VIV) is established treatment of degenerative surgical bioprostheses in patients at high operative risk and was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2015. The AHA/ACC guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease give it class IIa indication based on nonrandomized data including registries and case series only. When planning an aortic VIV procedure, therapy of small surgical valves should be approached with caution, as patient prosthesis mismatch (PPM) and significant residual gradients remain a major challenge. In addition, when the indication for the procedure is valve regurgitation, every effort should be taken to rule out aortic para-valvular leak, since VIV implantation is not expected to improve hemodynamics in this case. In addition to careful patient selection and procedural planning, the VIV procedure itself has particular operator-associated aspects that will be discussed in this chapter. Despite growing experience with this procedure, for selected patients, such as very-low-risk patients and patients with small diameter bioprosthesis, a heart team discussion should still consider the option of redo surgical aortic valve replacement.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) outcomes during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have not been fully evaluated and some structural programs in the world have been suspended during this period. We sought to evaluate and compare clinical outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI in pandemic versus nonpandemic era. In a single center, we compared 198 TAVI patients performed during 2019 to 59 patients performed during the COVID-19 pandemic period (March 1st to June 30th, 2020). Primary outcome was procedural success according to VARC criteria and 30-day mortality rates. VARC-defined procedural success was high in both groups (93.3% vs 96.6%; p = 0.53). There were no differences in any vascular complications (26% vs 19%; p = 0.3), permanent pacemaker implantation (11.8% vs 15.3%; p = 0.63), and length of hospital stay (5.2 vs 4.2 days; p = 0.29). Thirty-day mortality was similar (3% vs 3.4%; p = 1.0). We had no documented COVID-19 disease in our patients during follow up. In conclusion, TAVI procedures can be performed effectively and safely during the COVID-9 pandemic, using a minimalist approach, early discharge, and by maintaining proper use of personal protective equipment.

Background Coronary artery disease (CAD) is common among elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Current guidelines recommend that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of >70% proximal coronary lesions prior to TAVI. The aim of the current study was to evaluate two approaches to CAD diagnosis pre-TAVI. Methods We investigated 2,027 patients undergoing TAVI for severe aortic stenosis at two large centers with different pre-procedural CAD assessment: pre-TAVI computed tomography angiography (CTA) with selective invasive angiography according to CTA results (N=831) or mandatory invasive angiography (IA) (N=1,196). Peri-procedural complications were documented according to the VARC-2 criteria. Mortality rates were prospectively documented. Results Mean age of the study population was 86±4, of whom 55% were female. Patients in the IA group had significantly higher rates of pre-TAVI PCI compared to the CTA group (32% vs. 17%, p Conclusions In elderly patients, CTA driven approach for CAD evaluation pre-TAVI is a valid strategy with similar outcome as compared to invasive approach. CTA strategy significantly reduces invasive procedures rates without compromising patient's outcome. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is associated with poor outcome. The current analysis investigated the long term outcome of TR patients. Methods Historical retrospective cohort of all cardiovascular patients evaluated at a tertiary heart center between 2007 and 2019. The current analysis included all patients who underwent echocardiographic evaluation. TR severity was extracted for all patients from the echocardiographic reports. Primary outcome was all cause mortality and was available for all patients from the national population register. Results Final cohort included 97,561 subjects, of whom 42,187 (43%) were outpatients. Mean age was 66±17 and 55,976 (57%) were men. Mild, moderate and severe TR was documented in 27,389 (28%), 2,871 (3%) and 1,812 (2%) patients, respectively. During a median follow up of 50 months [IQR 22–83] 18,476 (19%) patients died. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated increased risk of death with increasing degree of TR (FIGURE; p Log rank Conclusions Severe TR is independently associated with poor survival. The association is modified by RV dysfunction and estimated RVSP. This report supports the need for studies to evaluate TR interventions on patients' clinical outcomes. Kaplan Meier Survival Curves Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Introduction Coronary clearance in patients undergoing TAVR is performed by invasive coronary angiography (ICA) or computed tomography angiography (CTA). We aimed to investigate whether CTA-derived low coronary calcium (CAC) score may rule out obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in these patients. Methods We included 232 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis (mean age 80±8; 50% female) who underwent both pre-TAVR CTA and ICA between 2012–2019. Obstructive CAD was defined as a >50% in left main or >70% in the 3 main epicardial vessels. Patients with prior coronary stents or bypass grafts were excluded. CAC score was calculated by Agatston method. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was applied to establish the CAC threshold for obstructive CAD, and adjustment for age, gender, diabetes and renal failure was applied. Results CAC scores range was 3.5–5200 (median = 1028). Eighty-eight patients (38%) had obstructive CAD. ROC curves showed high negative predictive value (NPV) for LAD - CAC score 280, NPV 95%; LCX - CAC score 320, NPV 93%; and RCA - CAC score 347, NPV 90% (figure). Binary logistic regression confirmed CAC score cutoffs per vessel as an independent predictor of obstructive CAD [LAD (OR 3.9, CI 1.1–14, p-0.033); CX (OR 5.7, CI 2.4–12, p Conclusion CAC score per-vessel can be useful to rule out obstructive CAD in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR. Using specific CAC cut offs can identify patients who may omit ICA CAC per vessel Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Introduction and purpose Data on the survival of patients with moderate aortic stenosis (AS) is conflicting. The purpose of the current analysis was to assess survival of moderate AS patients. Methods SHARE is an historical retrospective cohort of all cardiovascular patients evaluated in an Israeli tertiary hospital between 2007 and 2019. The current analysis included all patients who underwent echocardiographic evaluation. Aortic stenosis severity was extracted for all patients from the echocardiographic reports. All-cause mortality and was available for all patients. Subjects with severe AS or aortic valve replacement were excluded from the analysis. Results Cohort included 97,561 subjects of whom 42,187 (43.2%) were outpatients. Final cohort included 93,889 patients with a mean age of 66±17 (58% men). There were 2,949 (3%) with moderate AS. During a median follow up of 52 [IQR 22–89] months 17,173 (18%) patients died. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated worse cumulative probability of death of 51%±2% vs. 20%±0% at 5 years for patients with moderate AS vs. mild or no AS, respectively (p Log rank Conclusion Moderate AS is associated with worse survival. Our findings underscore the importance of careful clinical observation as well as the need for further studies. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Background Severe aortic stenosis patients suffer frequent heart failure decompensations events often requiring hospitalization. In extreme situations patients can be found with pulmonary edema and cardiogenic shock, unresponsive to medical treatment. Urgent trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as a treatment option for these high-risk patients. Methods We investigated 3,599 patients undergoing TAVI. Subjects were divided into two groups based on procedure urgency: patients who were electively hospitalized for the procedure (N=3,448) and those who had an urgent TAVI (N=151). Peri-procedural complications were documented according to the VARC-2 criteria. In hospital and 1-year mortality rates were prospectively documented. Results Mean age of the study population was 82±7, of whom 52% were female. Peri-procedural complication rates was significantly higher among patients with an urgent indication for TAVI compared to those having an elective procedure: valve malposition 3.6% vs. 0.6% (p-value=0.023), valve migration 3.2% vs. 0.9% (p-value=0.016), post procedure myocardial infarction 3.7% vs. 0.3% (p-value=0.004), and stage 3 acute kidney injury 2.6% vs. 0.5%, (p-value=0.02). Univariate analysis found that patients with urgent indication for TAVI had significantly higher in hospital mortality (5.8% vs. 1.4%, p-value Conclusions Patients with urgent indication for TAVI have higher in-hospital mortality and higher peri-procedural complication rates. However, if these patients survive the index hospitalization, they enjoy good prognosis. Kaplan-Meier's survival analysis Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Percutaneous mitral valve repair is an alternative treatment for high-risk patients with symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR). Proper patient selection is crucial to ensure that patients will benefit from the procedure while avoiding futile and potentially harmful medical interventions.To assess the reasons for and outcomes of patients who were declined MitraClip (Abbott Vascular) implantation and compare them with patients who underwent the procedure at our medical center.We screened 182 patients for percutaneous mitral valve repair with the MitraClip device. Of these, 84 were referred for MitraClip implantation and 75 underwent the procedure.Procedural success was achieved in 64 patients (85%) and was associated with superior survival at 30 months (73%) compared with implanted patients who did not achieve procedural success (41%; P=.02). Ninety-eight patients were turned down for the procedure due to anatomical incompatibility (72%), lack of indication ("too well") (16%), and clinical incompatibility ("too sick") (12%). Among turned down patients, those who were deemed too well had the highest survival rate (85%) at 30 months, patients with anatomical incompatibility had intermediate survival rates (63%), and patients deemed "too sick" had a dismal survival rate of only 25% (P.01). In fact, the patients who were too well had outcomes that were equivalent to patients who underwent successful MitraClip implantation.We identified a number of reasons for not performing MitraClip implantation that impact patient survival. The best outcomes were seen in patients who underwent successful MitraClip implantation and in patients who were deemed too well.

Background Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) was initially introduced to treat patients with aortic valve stenosis (AS) at high-risk for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Today, there is ample evidence supporting TAVR in high-risk groups. However, in recent years TAVR has been extended to low-to intermediate risk groups and relevant clinical evidence is still emerging, leaving some uncertainties. Methods To obtain information on TAVR versus SAVR in low-to intermediate risk groups, we conducted an overview of systematic reviews following PRISMA guidelines and based on a systematic search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane and CRD databases. We focused on systematic reviews assessing mortality and VARC 2 as clinical outcomes. Results The majority of the 11 systematic reviews included in our study reported no differences in mortality between TAVR and SAVR at short and long-term follow-up times. Two reviews that included the most recent RCTs on low-risk patients reported a decreased mortality risk with TAVR at one-year follow-up. Regarding the secondary endpoints of stroke and MI, the majority of studies presented similar results for TAVR and SAVR. Acute Kidney Injury, Bleeding Complications, Atrial Fibrillation were less frequent with TAVR, with lower risk of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation and Aortic Regurgitation with SAVR. Conclusions Our overview indicated that TAVR is a promising intervention for low-to-intermediate surgical risk patients; however additional evidence from longer term follow-up is needed to confirm these findings. This overview highlights inconsistencies about reporting and presentation of data, most notably limited clarity on effects of risk of bias on trial results., Highlights • We reviewed the evidence for TAVR and SAVR in low-to intermediate risk patients. • Most reviews found no difference in mortality between TAVR and SAVR. • Acute Kidney Injury, Bleeding and Atrial Fibrillation were less frequent with TAVR. • Pacemaker Implantation and Aortic Regurgitation were less frequent with SAVR. • Most reviews found no difference for Stroke and Myocardial Infarction.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is the gold standard for severe valvular aortic stenosis in patients at high/prohibitive surgical risk. This procedure has also been used in patients with previous mitral valve (MV) prostheses, with contrasting outcomes reported. The aim of this study is to describe procedural and early outcomes of patients with previous MV prostheses undergoing TAVR.This is a retrospective registry of 154 patients with previous MV prostheses who underwent TAVR across high-volume medical centres at a mean of 11.7 ± 8.4 years after mitral surgery.Mean mitroaortic distance at computed tomography was 9.7 ± 4.8 mm. Procedural success was achieved in 150 (97.4%) patients, with reduction of aortic gradients (42.6 ± 14.2 to 10.0 ± 7.0 mm Hg; P0.001). Device success was achieved in 133 (86.3%) patients. MV prosthesis interference by the TAVR device was observed in 2 patients; in both, the mitroaortic distance was5 mm, with 1 complicated by TAVR prosthesis embolization. Periprocedural complications included 4 (2.6%) cerebrovascular accidents, 10 (6.6%) major vascular complications, 22 (14.4%) severe bleedings, 1 (0.7%) myocardial infarction, and 5 (3.2%) in-hospital deaths (all cases cardiovascular or procedure related). At a median follow-up of 13.5 (interquartile range 1.0 to 36.0) months, 26 (16.9%) deaths occurred; 15 (9.7%) were cardiac related. Late fatal mitral prosthesis thromboses occurred in 2 patients. We recorded a case of fatal hemorrhagic stroke; hospital readmission was observed in 25 (16.2%) patients due to worsening heart failure.TAVR in patients with previous mitral prostheses appears to be safe and feasible, with good hemodynamic results at 30-day and at longer-term follow-up.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has a negative impact on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Data on outcomes in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) undergoing TAVR are scarce. We compared the outcomes in RTRs undergoing TAVR with matched patients who have native kidneys and similar kidney function.This retrospective cohort study used data from 16 TAVR centres (13,941 patients). The study cohort included 216 patients (72 RTRs and 144 matched controls).The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 39.2 ± 23.6 vs 44.5 ± 23.6 mL/min for RTRs and control patients (P = 0.149), with a similar CKD stage distribution. After TAVR, the eGFR declined among RTRs but remained stable for up to 1 year in controls (P = 0.021). Long-term hemodialysis was required in 19 (26.4%) RTRs and 20 (13.8%) controls (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.09 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-3.86; P = 0.039) and was most often initiated during the periprocedural period (14 RTRs vs 16 controls; P = 0.039). After a median follow-up of 2.3 years, risk of death (29.2% vs 31.9%) and death/hemodialysis (40.3% vs 36.8%) was similar between the groups. The contrast volume/eGFR ratio was the strongest predictor of hemodialysis initiation (odds ratio [OR] = 1.64; 95% CI, 1.36-1.97 per 1 unit increase; P0.001), with a greater effect among RTRs than controls (P for interaction = 0.022).s: TAVR appears safe in RTRs with mortality rates similar to matched patients with native kidneys. However, RTRs carry an increased risk of progressive renal impairment and need for hemodialysis initiation after TAVR. Our data highlight the importance of minimizing contrast load during TAVR, particularly in RTRs.

Purpose To report long-term results of iliofemoral stent placement after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Materials and Methods TAVR access-related complications treated with iliofemoral stent placement were recorded in 56 patients (mean age, 81 years; range; 53–93 years; 48% male) of 648 patients who underwent TAVR at a single center. Fifty-six patients treated with stent placement (40 patients with stent grafts and 16 patients with bare metal stents) underwent clinical and ultrasonographic follow-up after a mean of 676 days (range, 60–1840 days). Results During follow-up, none of the 56 patients who had stent placement underwent a vascular reintervention of the affected limb, and none suffered from limb claudication. No decrease was observed in ankle-brachial index (ABI) values to an abnormal value, except in 1 patient (mean preprocedural and postprocedural ABI of 1.2 ± 0.14, range, 0.97–1.4 and 1.19 ± 0.24, range, 0.65–1.54, respectively). Arterial duplex assessment showed normal stent flow velocity (mean, 168.7 ± 63.2 cm/sec; range, 80–345 cm/sec) in all but 1 patient. Conclusion Iliofemoral stent implantation is a safe and efficacious treatment for vascular access site and access-related complications during transfemoral TAVR.

Objectives The ability of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE)-2 scores to predict outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is insufficient. Frailty and serum albumin as a frailty marker were shown to correlate with prognosis after TAVR. We sought to evaluate the additive value of serum albumin to STS and EuroSCORE-2 scores to predict mortality in individuals undergoing TAVR. Design Retrospective analysis. Setting Tertiary-care hospital prospective registry. Participants Individuals who underwent TAVR (N = 426). Measurements We compared survival rates according to median baseline albumin levels (4 g/dL), STS score (4.5%), and EuroSCORE-2 (3.45%). Participants were divided into four groups according to median serum albumin and median STS and EuroSCORE-2 scores (high vs low), and 1-year survival rates were compared. A category-free net reclassification index (NRI) was calculated to compare the ability of a model of STS or EuroSCORE-2 alone to classify mortality risk with and without the addition of baseline serum albumin. Results Participants with low albumin levels had higher mortality (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.66–5.26, P < .001). Participants with low serum albumin and a high STS (HR = 4.55, 95% CI = 2.21–9.38, P < .001) or EuroSCORE-2 (HR = 2.72, 95% CI = 1.48–5.06, P = .001) score had higher mortality. Using NRI analysis, a model that included albumin in addition to STS correctly reclassified 42% of events (NRI = 0.58) and a model that included albumin in addition to EuroSCORE-2 correctly reclassified 44% of events (NRI = 0.64). Conclusion Serum albumin, as a marker of frailty, can significantly improve the ability of STS and EuroSCORE-2 scores to predict TAVR-related mortality.

Objectives The study sought to examine the effect of coronary artery disease (CAD) on mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Background CAD is common in the TAVR population. However, there are conflicting data on the prognostic significance of CAD and its treatment in this population. Methods The authors analyzed 1,270 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing TAVR at 3 Israeli centers. They investigated the association of CAD severity (no CAD, nonsevere CAD [i.e., SYNTAX score (SS) 22]) and revascularization completeness (“reasonable” incomplete revascularization [ICR] [i.e., residual SS 8]) with all-cause mortality following TAVR using a Cox proportional hazards ratio model adjusted for multiple prognostic variables. Results Of the 1,270 patients, 817 (64%) had no CAD, 331 (26%) had nonsevere CAD, and 122 (10%) had severe CAD. Over a median follow-up of 1.9 years, 311 (24.5%) patients died. Mortality was higher in the severe CAD and the ICR groups, but not in the nonsevere CAD or “reasonable” ICR groups, versus no CAD. After multivariate adjustment, both severe CAD (hazard ratio: 2.091; p = 0.017) and ICR (hazard ratio: 1.720; p = 0.031) were associated with increased mortality. Conclusions Only severe CAD was associated with increased mortality post-TAVR. More complete revascularization pre-TAVR may attenuate the association of severe CAD and mortality.

Balloon pre-dilatation before transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is performed at the discretion of the treating physician. Clinical data assessing the implications of this step on procedural outcomes are limited.We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1164 consecutive TAVR patients in the Israeli multicenter TAVR registry (Sheba, Rabin, and Tel Aviv Medical Centers) between the years 2008 and 2014. Patients were divided to those who underwent balloon pre-dilation (n=1026) versus those who did not (n=138).Rates of balloon pre-dilation decreased from 95% in 2008-2011 to 59% in 2014 (p for trend=0.002). Baseline characteristics between groups were similar except for more smoking (22% vs. 8%, p=0.008), less past CABG (18% vs. 26%, p=0.016), less diabetes mellitus (35% vs. 45%, p=0.01), and lower STS mortality scores (5.2±3.7 vs. 6.1±3.5, p=0.006) in the pre-dilatation group. The pre-dilation group included less patients with moderate to severely depressed LVEF (7% vs. 16%, p0.001) and higher aortic peak gradients (76.9±22.7mmHg vs. 71.4±24.3mmHg, p=0.01). Stroke rates were comparable in both groups (2.5% vs. 3%, p=0.8), but pre-dilation was associated with lower rates of balloon post-dilatation (9% vs. 26%, p0.001). On multivariate analysis, balloon pre-dilatation was not a predictor of device success or any post-procedural complications (p=0.07).Balloon pre-dilatation was not associated with procedural adverse events and may decrease the need for balloon post-dilatation. The results of the present study support the current practice to perform liberally balloon pre-dilatation prior to valve implantation.

Very little data exist on the impact of sex on aortic and arterial anatomy as relevant for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).To investigate whether patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) referred for TAVI display sex-specific differences in aortic root and ilio-femoral artery size.In 506 patients referred for pre-procedural CT evaluation before TAVI we performed a detailed assessment of aortic root anatomy: size of the annulus and the sinus of Valsalva (SoV), diameter of the sino-tubular junction (STJ), and distance of the coronary artery ostia to the aortic annulus plane; we also determined the dimensions of aorta, subclavian, and ilio-femoral arteries.Women had significantly smaller aortic root dimensions (annulus mean diameter: 22.9 ± 2.2 mm vs. 25.7 ± 2.7 mm, SoV mean diameter: 31.8 ± 4.2 mm vs. 36.3 ± 3.8 mm, STJ mean diameter: 26.3 ± 3.4 mm vs. 29.8 ± 4.2 mm) and lower left and right coronary artery ostia take-off (12.3 ± 2.4 vs. 14.1 ± 2.9 mm; 14.8 ± 2.6 vs. 17.1 ± 3.2 mm, respectively) than men (P 0.001 for all), even after adjustment for their smaller body surface area (BSA) and height. Dimensions of the ascending aorta, subclavian and ilio-femoral arteries were also significantly smaller in women, but not when adjusted for BSA.Women with severe AS had smaller aortic root dimensions even after correcting for their smaller body size and height, reflecting a sex-specific difference. In contrast, sex-related differences in aortic, subclavian, and ilio-femoral dimensions were fully explained by the smaller BSA of women.

Background Risk stratification in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is limited and based on clinical judgment and surgical AVR scoring systems. Recently, extent of cardiac damage using an echocardiographic classification was purposed to assess prognosis of patients undergoing TAVR. We aimed to validate this new scoring system in a real-world cohort and to examine the addition of baseline albumin in risk assessment. Methods We investigated 2,608 patients undergoing TAVR. All subjects had an echocardiography test prior to TAVR. Subjects were divided into five groups based on their echocardiography findings: stage 0 – 758 (29%) patients, stage 1 – 769 (30%), stage 2 – 730 (28%), stage 3 – 320 (12%) and stage 4 (1.2%). Patients were further assessed by incorporating baseline albumin. Results Mean age of study population was 82±7 years. Kaplan-Meier's survival analysis showed that the cumulative probability of mortality was significantly higher among subjects with increased stage compared to the lower stages (p KM according to stage and albumin Conclusions Cardiac damage classification is validated in a real-world cohort of patients undergoing TAVR. Incorporation of low baseline albumin may further identify patients at the highest risk group.

Background The combination of a small aortic valve area valve area (AVA) and a low mean gradient (MG) severity pose a serious clinical challenge in the diagnosis of severe aortic stenosis (AS). While this discordance is frequently labeled “low-flow low-gradient AS”, there are two additional potential causes: underestimation of MG and underestimation of AVA. Purpose To investigate prevalence and root causes of discordant echocardiographic findings in symptomatic patients with AS and normal LV function by comparing Doppler data, invasive hemodynamic data, CT LV outflow tract size and calcium score. Methods and results We studied 67 severely symptomatic patients with AS and an LVEF>50%. Thirty patients (45%) had discordant echocardiographic findings (MG35 mmHg; in 5 it was >30 mmHg and only in 2 between 25 and 29 mmHg. In 6 of the 14 patients with underestimated MG, no right parasternal Doppler examination had been performed, LVOT VTI tracings were clearly suboptimal in 3 patients and 1 case was deemed inadequate due to poor imaging quality. LVOT area by echocardiography or by CT could not differentiate between Concordants and Discordants (p=0.3 and p=0.8 respectively) or between True and False Discordants (p=0.5 and p=0.6 respectively). While calcium score was similar in Concordants (2711±1159 AU) and False Discordants (2692±1136AU, p=0.96), it tended to be higher in Concordants (2711±1159 AU), when compared to True Discordants (1906±1284 AU, p=0.07). In patients with concordant echocardiographic findings calcium score levels of >3000 AU in men and >1600 AU in female had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 90% for the correct diagnosis of severe aortic stenosis. In patients with discordant findings the PPV was 80%. Conclusions 1) The majority of severely symptomatic AS patients with normal LV systolic function an echocardiographic AVA≤1.0 cm2 and a MG>30mmHg considered for TAVR have severe AS by calcium score. 2) In this patient population, discordant echocardiographic findings are in about half of the cases due to technical factors (“pseudo-discordance”) rather than due to true low flow low-gradient stenosis. 3) Pseudo-discordance is mainly due to mild-moderate underestimation of gradients, caused by a lack of reliable right parasternal tracings, rather than due to underestimation of valve area due to the echocardiographic circularity assumption in the presence of an elliptical LVOT. 4) The diagnosis of true low-flow AS cannot be established without a clear Doppler tracing from the right parasternal window. 5) Absent an adequate right parasternal window, patients should undergo CT assessment of calcium score.

Background About a decade past the first transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), data are limited regarding temporal trends accompanying its evolution from novel technology to mainstream therapy. We evaluated these trends in a large multicenter TAVI registry. Hypothesis TAVI is changing and improving with time. Methods Patients who underwent TAVI between January 2008 and December 2014 at 3 high-volume Israeli centers were divided into 5 time quintiles according to procedure date. Outcomes were analyzed and reported according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2. Results A total of 1285 patients were studied (43% male; mean age, 83 ± 3 years; mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons [STS] score, 5.5 ± 3.6). Over time, there was a shift toward treating patients at lower STS score, increased use of conscious sedation and transfemoral approach, and decreased use of balloon predilatation. The balloon-expandable to self-expandable valve utilization ratio decreased, the valve-in-valve experience increased from 4% to 17% of all TAVI volume, and length of hospital stay was halved (P = 0.006). Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed gradual decrease in mortality risk (P = 0.031), but there was no significant 1-year mortality decrease by multivariable analysis. Each year increment was associated with an adjusted 20%, 15%, and 12% decrease in new pacemaker obligation (P = 0.004), new pacemaker obligation or left bundle branch block (P = 0.008), and in-hospital infections (P = 0.082), respectively. Conclusions Temporal trends accompanying TAVI evolution include its utilization in lower-risk patients, procedural simplification, improved overall survival, decreased pacemaker obligation, and shorter hospital stay.

AIMS Albumin is a marker of frailty. Scarce data are available on correlations between frailty-related parameters and outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI. This study sought to evaluate the relation between albumin and mortality in TAVI candidates. METHODS AND RESULTS A total of 150 patients (mean age 81±6 years) undergoing TAVI were included in the study. Patients with pre-procedural albumin >4 g/dl (>40 g/L) (n=71) were compared to those ≤4 g/dl (≤40 g/L) (n=79). The cut-off value of 4 g/dl (40 g/L) was based on the mean value of albumin in the patients included in the study. During a mean follow-up of 2.1 years the survival rate was 72%. Patients in both groups had similar baseline characteristics. The 2.1-year mortality was higher in the low albumin group compared with the normal albumin group (35% vs. 19%, p=0.01). Multivariate analysis indicated that low pre-procedural albumin was independently associated with a more than twofold increase in 2.1-year all-cause mortality (p=0.01, HR=2.28; 95% CI: 1.17-4.44). Low post-procedural serum albumin remained a strong parameter correlated with all-cause mortality (HR=2.47; 95% CI: 1.28-4.78; p

Background: The risk of conduction system abnormalities (CSA) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation remains high. We aimed to evaluate the impact of mitral annular calcium (MAC) score on the development of CSA after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Methods: Consecutive patients (n=168), with severe AoV stenosis, without prior CSA, underwent computed tomography transcatheter AoV implantation followed by device implantation; CoreValve (n=72) and SAPIEN (n=96). MAC, AoV, and left ventricular outflow tract calcium (Ca++) scores were quantitated from noncontrast ECG-gated computed tomography using Agatston method. The primary end point was a combination of complete left bundle branch block or high-degree atrioventricular block. Logistic regression was used to analyze the predictive value of Ca++ scores of different locations. Results: The primary end point was documented in 62% of the fourth quartile MAC score (>2700) patients as compared with 31% of the first quartile (P =0.03. Logistic regression analysis documented MAC score as an independent predictor either of primary end point as a continuous variable (odds ratio: 1.02, 95% [CI]: 1.00 – 1.03, p = 0.021) or as quartile cutoffs, whereas Q4 was a strong and independent predictor (odds ratio: 3.69, 95% [CI]: 1.37 – 9.95, p = 0.010). Conclusions: MAC score was found to be an independent predictor of CSA in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation without preexisting CSA. Therefore, the current study suggests that patients with high MAC score category (fourth MAC score quartile) should be considered at high risk for CSA, warranting closer monitoring. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02023060.