Invasive- versus computed tomography-angiography for the evaluation of coronary artery disease among elderly patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Background Coronary artery disease (CAD) is common among elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Current guidelines recommend that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of >70% proximal coronary lesions prior to TAVI. The aim of the current study was to evaluate two approaches to CAD diagnosis pre-TAVI. Methods We investigated 2,027 patients undergoing TAVI for severe aortic stenosis at two large centers with different pre-procedural CAD assessment: pre-TAVI computed tomography angiography (CTA) with selective invasive angiography according to CTA results (N=831) or mandatory invasive angiography (IA) (N=1,196). Peri-procedural complications were documented according to the VARC-2 criteria. Mortality rates were prospectively documented. Results Mean age of the study population was 86±4, of whom 55% were female. Patients in the IA group had significantly higher rates of pre-TAVI PCI compared to the CTA group (32% vs. 17%, p Conclusions In elderly patients, CTA driven approach for CAD evaluation pre-TAVI is a valid strategy with similar outcome as compared to invasive approach. CTA strategy significantly reduces invasive procedures rates without compromising patient's outcome. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None