Search

The security of hardware intellectual properties (IPs) has become a significant concern, as the opportunity for piracy, reverse engineering, and malicious modification is increasing. Hardware obfuscation has been studied as a potent method to protect against all these attack vectors. However, most of the existing obfuscation techniques have been successfully compromised, where many inherent functional or structural vulnerabilities in these techniques are utilized to reveal the obfuscation key or retrieve the original design. In this paper, we introduce LeGO, a learning-guided obfuscation framework that overcomes known vulnerabilities in a scalable and systematic manner, leading to a robust and lightweight locking mechanism. The proposed framework is guided by our security evaluation process that performs a thorough assessment of an obfuscated IP against various attacks and identifies the vulnerabilities. It then judiciously selects and applies a set of design modification steps or rules that can eliminate these vulnerabilities. Such a rule-based obfuscation process has the distinctive capability to address all existing as well as emerging attacks through the learning of appropriate design transformation steps that prevent these attacks. We present an efficient strategy to apply these rules on a design, while resolving any conflict. Our evaluation of the LeGO framework on a set of ISCAS85 and open-source IP benchmarks has shown promising results in terms of robustness against diverse attacks with an average of area, power and delay overhead of 39%, 45%, and 15%, respectively.

Effective resistance to intellectual property theft, reverse engineering, and hardware Trojan insertion in integrated circuit supply chains is increasingly essential, for which many solutions have been proposed. Accordingly, strong attacks are also designed in this field. One way to achieve the above goal is obfuscation. The hardware obfuscation method hides the primary function of the circuit and the normal Netlist from the attacker by adding several key gates in the original Netlist. The functionality circuit is correct only if the correct key is applied; otherwise, the circuit is obfuscated. In recent years, various obfuscation methods have been proposed. One is logic locking, the most prominent hardware protection technique since it can protect against untrusted items. Logic locking induces functional and structural changes to a design even before the layout generation. We secured the circuit against hardware Trojan insertion with a secure logic locking method based on the insertion of key gates in interference mode. We call our proposed method Secure Interference Logic Locking, SILL. SILL is based on minimum controllability in paths with maximum fan-out. In this method, we have reduced the number of key gates required for circuit obfuscation and created the maximum Hamming distance between normal and obscure outputs. In addition, the key gates are added to the circuit’s complete interference, and the AES algorithm is used to generate the key. Our proposed method, SILL, was simulated in the Vivado simulation environment; the algorithms used in this method were prepared in VHDL language and designed to allow parallel execution, then applied on the original Netlist of the ISCAS85 benchmark circuits. By analyzing and comparing the results of this simulation to recent works, the amount of hardware consumption has decreased (about 5% space consumption and about a 0.15-nanosecond time delay). Then, the SAT attack algorithm was tested on ISCAS85 benchmark circuits that were obfuscated with SILL. The execution time of the attack in the second attempt was 0.24 nanoseconds longer compared to similar recent works, and it timed out in the fourth attempt. The resistance of our proposed method, having less hardware overhead and higher speed is more effective against SAT attacks than the existing conventional methods.

International audience; A digital Finite Impulse Response (FIR) filter is a ubiquitous block in digital signal processing applications and its behavior is determined by its coefficients. To protect filter coefficients from an adversary, efficient obfuscation techniques have been proposed, either by hiding them behind decoys or replacing them by key bits. In this article, we initially introduce a query attack that can discover the secret key of such obfuscated FIR filters, which could not be broken by existing prominent attacks. Then, we propose a first of its kind hybrid technique, including both hardware obfuscation and logic locking using a point function for the protection of parallel direct and transposed forms of digital FIR filters. Experimental results show that the hybrid protection technique can lead to FIR filters with higher security while maintaining the hardware complexity competitive or superior to those locked by prominent logic locking methods. It is also shown that the protected multiplier blocks and FIR filters are resilient to existing attacks. The results on different forms and realizations of FIR filters show that the parallel direct form FIR filter has a promising potential for a secure design.

As the internet-of-things (IoT) era begins, there is a significant need for low-cost access control schemes that allow humans to activate and maintain IoT systems.Traditional biometric access control systems remain, however, vulnerable to physical attacks resulting in template theft/privacy, illegal access, etc. This paper aimed to address this by expanding on a proposal called BLOcKeR, which combines biometrics with two recent advances in hardware security—physically unclonable functions (PUFs) and hardware obfuscation. Hardware obfuscation is a technique to protect electronic hardware against access control circumvention attacks through locking mechanisms. A PUF is incorporated to tie the biometrics of the owner to the system. Combining these advances with biometrics, BLOcKeR protects a biometric system from physical attacks by locking its functionality and aims at ensuring successful activation of the locked system unlike the authentication /matching in biometric systems. In addition, unlike various existing approaches, BLOcKeR does not store the raw biometric of users while providing irreversibility, unlinkability, and revocability to the templates. We present a security analysis and experiments with more than 45,000 attack variants to evaluate BLOcKeR’s security against unauthorized access.

Training accurate deep learning (DL) models require large amounts of training data, significant work in labeling the data, considerable computing resources, and substantial domain expertise. In short, they are expensive to develop. Hence, protecting these models, which are valuable storehouses of intellectual properties (IP), against model stealing/cloning attacks is of paramount importance. Today’s mobile processors feature Neural Processing Units (NPUs) to accelerate the execution of DL models. DL models executing on NPUs are vulnerable to hyperparameter extraction via side-channel attacks and model parameter theft via bus monitoring attacks. This paper presents a novel solution to defend against DL IP theft in NPUs during model distribution and deployment/execution via lightweight, keyed model obfuscation scheme. Unauthorized use of such models results in inaccurate classification. In addition, we present an ideal end-to-end deep learning trusted system composed of: 1) model distribution via hardware root-of-trust and public-key cryptography infrastructure (PKI) and 2) model execution via low-latency memory encryption. We demonstrate that our proposed obfuscation solution achieves IP protection objectives without requiring specialized training or sacrificing the model’s accuracy. In addition, the proposed obfuscation mechanism preserves the output class distribution while degrading the model’s accuracy for unauthorized parties, covering any evidence of a hacked model.

Logic locking has emerged as a promising solution to protect integrated circuits against piracy and tampering. However, the security provided by existing logic locking techniques is often thwarted by Boolean satisfiability (SAT)-based oracle-guided attacks. Criteria for successful SAT attacks on locked circuits include: (i) the circuit under attack is fully combinational, or (ii) the attacker has scan chain access. To address the threat posed by SAT-based attacks, we adopt the dynamically obfuscated scan chain (DOSC) architecture and illustrate its resiliency against the SAT attacks when inserted into the scan chain of an obfuscated design. We demonstrate, both mathematically and experimentally, that DOSC exponentially increases the resiliency against key extraction by SAT attack and its variants. Our results show that the mathematical estimation of attack complexity correlates to the experimental results with an accuracy of 95% or better. Along with the formal proof, we model DOSC architecture to its equivalent combinational circuit and perform SAT attack to evaluate its resiliency empirically. Our experiments demonstrate that SAT attack on DOSC-inserted benchmark circuits timeout at minimal test time overhead, and while DOSC requires less than 1% area and power overhead.

Emerging nanoelectronic semiconductor devices have been quite promising in enhancing hardware-oriented security and trust. However, implementing hardware security primitives and methodologies requires large area overhead and power consumption. Furthermore, emerging new attack models and vulnerabilities are regularly evolving and cannot be adequately addressed by current CMOS technology. This paper for the first time presents a comprehensive review of numerous post-CMOS technologies based hardware security primitives and methodologies, particularly true random number generators, physically unclonable functions, sidechannel analysis countermeasures, and hardware obfuscation techniques. Various beyond-CMOS device technologies including tunneling FET (TFET), hybrid phase transition FET (HyperFET), carbon nanotube FET (CNTFET), silicon nanowire FET (SiNWFET), symmetrical tunneling FET (SymFET), phase-change memory (PCM), spin-transfer torque magnetic tunnel junction (STT-MTJ), resistive random access memory (RRAM) have been considered in this study. First, the basic principle of operation and unusual characteristics of nanoelectronic devices used for hardware security applications have been extensively discussed. Later, CMOS technology challenges and benefits of emerging nanotechnologies for the design of hardware security primitives and methodologies have been reported. Finally, different analyses have been presented to demonstrate the promising performance of post-CMOS devices over the current CMOS technology in different countermeasures. Additionally, challenges, future directions, and plans have been presented to achieve more research outcomes in this field.

We propose three orthogonal techniques to secure Register-Transfer-Level (RTL) Intellectual Property (IP). In the first technique, the key-based RTL obfuscation scheme is proposed at an early design phase during High-Level Synthesis (HLS). Given a control-dataflow graph, we identify operations on non-critical paths and leverage synthesis information during and after HLS to insert obfuscation logic. In the second approach, we propose a robust design lockout mechanism for a key-obfuscated RTL IP when an incorrect key is applied more than the allowed number of attempts. We embed comparators on obfuscation logic output to check if the applied key is correct or not and a finite-state machine checker to enforce design lockout. Once locked out, only an authorized user (designer) can unlock the locked IP. In the third technique, we design four variants of the obfuscating module to camouflage the RTL design. We analyze the security properties of obfuscation, design lockout, and camouflaging. We demonstrate the feasibility on four datapath-intensive IPs and one crypto core for 32-, 64-, and 128-bit key lengths under three design corners (best, typical, and worst) with reasonable area, power, and delay overheads on both ASIC and FPGA platforms.

Editor’s note : If you are designing or integrating hardware IP blocks into your designs, and you are using common global supply chains, then reading this overview article on how to protect your IP against reverse engineering, piracy, and malicious alteration attacks is a must. The authors give a comprehensive overview of current countermeasures that can be used at RTL, gate-, and layout-level to protect your design with a focus on combinational and sequential logic locking and a discussion on merits, overheads, and shortcomings of such techniques. —Jurgen Teich, FAU Erlangen

With the advancement of system miniaturization and automation, Lab-on-a-Chip (LoC) technology has revolutionized traditional experimental procedures. Microfluidic Biochip (MFB) is an emerging branch of LoC with wide medical applications such as DNA sequencing, drug delivery, and point of care diagnostics. Due to the critical usage of MFBs, their security is of great importance. In this article, we exploit the vulnerabilities of two types of MFBs: Flow-based Microfluidic Biochip (FMFB) and Digital Microfluidic Biochip (DMFB). We propose a systematic framework for applying Reverse Engineering (RE) attacks and Hardware Trojan (HT) attacks on MFBs as well as for practical countermeasures against the proposed attacks. We evaluate the attacks and defense on various benchmarks where experimental results prove the effectiveness of our methods. Security metrics are defined to quantify the vulnerability of MFBs. The overhead and performance of the proposed attacks as well as countermeasures are also discussed.

Hardware reverse engineering is a powerful and universal tool for both security engineers and adversaries. From a defensive perspective, it allows for detection of intellectual property infringements and hardware Trojans, while it simultaneously can be used for product piracy and malicious circuit manipulations. From a designer's perspective, it is crucial to have an estimate of the costs associated with reverse engineering, yet little is known about this, especially when dealing with obfuscated hardware. The contribution at hand provides new insights into this problem, based on algorithms with sound mathematical underpinnings. Our contributions are threefold: First, we present the graph similarity problem for automating hardware reverse engineering. To this end, we improve several state-of-the-art graph similarity heuristics with optimizations tailored to the hardware context. Second, we propose a novel algorithm based on multiresolutional spectral analysis of adjacency matrices. Third, in three extensively evaluated case studies, namely (1) gate-level netlist reverse engineering, (2) hardware Trojan detection, and (3) assessment of hardware obfuscation, we demonstrate the practical nature of graph similarity algorithms.

Hardware obfuscation is a technique that modifies the circuit to hide the functionality. Obfuscations through algorithmic modifications add protection in addition to circuit-level techniques, and their effects on the data paths can be analyzed and controlled at the architectural level. Many error-correcting coding and cryptography algorithms are based on finite field arithmetic. For the first time, this paper proposes a hardware obfuscation scheme achieved through varying finite field constructions and primitive element representations. Also the variations are effectively transformed to bit permuters controlled by obfuscation keys to achieve high level of security with very small complexity overheads. To illustrate the effectiveness, the proposed scheme is applied to obfuscate Reed-Solomon decoders, which are broadly used in communication and storage systems. For a (255, 239) RS decoder over finite field $GF(256)$GF(256), the proposed scheme achieves 1239 bits of independent obfuscation key with 4.4 percent area overhead, while yielding no penalty on the throughput and only one extra clock cycle of latency.

International audience; This paper presents a high-level circuit obfuscation technique to prevent the theft of intellectual property (IP) of integrated circuits. In particular, our technique protects a class of circuits that relies on constant multiplications, such as filters and neural networks, where the constants themselves are the IP to be protected. By making use of decoy constants and a key-based scheme, a reverse engineer adversary at an untrusted foundry is rendered incapable of discerning true constants from decoy constants. The time-multiplexed constant multiplication (TMCM) block of such circuits, which realizes the multiplication of an input variable by a constant at a time, is considered as our case study for obfuscation. Furthermore, two TMCM design architectures are taken into account; an implementation using a multiplier and a multiplierless shift-adds implementation. Optimization methods are also applied to reduce the hardware complexity of these architectures. The well-known satisfiability (SAT) and automatic test pattern generation (ATPG) attacks are used to determine the vulnerability of the obfuscated designs. It is observed that the proposed technique incurs small overheads in area, power, and delay that are comparable to the hardware complexity of prominent logic locking methods. Yet, the advantage of our approach is in the insight that constants-instead of arbitrary circuit nodes-become key-protected. Index Terms-hardware obfuscation, reverse engineering, IP obfuscation, SAT attack, digital FIR filter design.

At different stages of the Integrated Circuit (IC) lifecycle there are attacks which threaten to compromise the integrity of the design through piracy, reverse engineering, hardware Trojan insertion, side channel analysis, and other physical attacks. Some of the most notable challenges in this field deal specifically with Intellectual Property (IP) theft and reverse engineering attacks. One method by which some of these concerns can be addressed is by introducing hardware obfuscation to the design in various forms. In this work we evaluate the effectiveness of a few different forms of netlist-level hardware obfuscation of a 16-bit substitution box component of a customizable cipher MK-3. These obfuscation methods were attacked using a satisfiability (SAT) attack, which is able to iteratively rule out classes of keys at once. This has been shown to be very effective against many forms of hardware obfuscation. A method to successfully defend against this attack is described in this paper. This method introduces a modified SIMON block cipher as a One-way Random Function (ORF) that is used to generate an obfuscation key. The S-box obfuscated using this 32-bit key and a round-reduced implementation of the SIMON cipher is shown to be secure against a SAT attack for at least 5 days.

A clear majority of electronic devices applications used in our daily life require a reliable, secure architecture, e.g., healthcare, social security cards, electronic meters, and smart homes. As a result, many studies are trying to develop appropriate solutions to tackle hardware security threats such as IC piracy, IC overbuilding, reverse engineering, counterfeiting, and tampering. Hardware obfuscation has been introduced as one of the leading robust, low-cost security solutions against different security threats, especially when combined with physical unclonable functions. Considering the inherent irreproducibility of PUFs, this method can provide a high-level security system. However, finding an applicable existent PUF or implementing a new PUF design that meets each hardware obfuscation requirements is not a trivial task. This study reviews and discusses hardware security systems based on PUFs inherited variations and the corresponding hardware obfuscation approaches.

With the recent introduction of techniques to restrict scan chain access, a new class of deobfuscation problems emerge, in which the threat model, although similar to deobfuscation of a logic locked circuit, forms a novel class of attack. In this paper, the concept of a logic restricted circuit is generalized and defined. Next, a novel type of SAT-based attack is proposed for the new class of deobfuscation problems, described as a 2-stage SAT-attack. A SAT-attack resilience measure is developed to quantify the security strength of a logic restricted circuit against a SAT-based attack. Finally, the proposed SAT-resilience framework is applied to compare and evaluate effectiveness of example logic restriction schemes.

Hardware intellectual properties (IPs) used in diverse electronic systems face several critical security issues during their life cycle, including piracy, reverse engineering, and extraction of design secrets. To combat these issues, pre-silicon hardware obfuscation or logic locking has emerged as a promising solution and has been an active research topic over the past decade. However, in parallel, a number of functional and structural attacks on obfuscation have been discovered by the research community to break the protection provided by the existing obfuscation schemes. These attacks have played a major role in enhancing the security of hardware obfuscation schemes. In this paper, we introduce a novel combined attack modality, referred to as SOMA, which relies on judiciously combining the existing attacks to produce a significantly more powerful one. We demonstrate that such an attack can expose hidden exploits and measure the level of security offered by a given obfuscation technique. SOMA creates a sequence of attacks, where the outcome of each attack is used to guide the next and concludes with a key-refinement measure to restore the functionality of a locked IP. We demonstrate that SOMA can easily break major existing locking schemes that are believed to be secure with an attack accuracy average of 94.88%.

In recent years, IC reverse engineering and IC fabrication supply chain security have grown to become significant economic and security threats for designers, system integrators, and end customers. Many of the existing logic locking and obfuscation techniques have shown to be vulnerable to attack once the attacker has access to the design netlist either through reverse engineering or through an untrusted fabrication facility. We introduce soft embedded FPGA redaction, a hardware obfuscation approach that allows the designer substitute security-critical IP blocks within a design with a synthesizable eFPGA fabric. This method fully conceals the logic and the routing of the critical IP and is compatible with standard ASIC flows for easy integration and process portability. To demonstrate eFPGA redaction, we obfuscate a RISC-V control path and a GPS P-code generator. We also show that the modified netlists are resilient to SAT attacks with moderate VLSI overheads. The secure RISC-V design has 1.89x area and 2.36x delay overhead while the GPS design has 1.39x area and negligible delay overhead when implemented on an industrial 22nm FinFET CMOS process.

In recent years, IC reverse engineering and IC fabrication supply chain security have grown to become significant economic and security threats for designers, system integrators, and end customers. Many of the existing logic locking and obfuscation techniques have shown to be vulnerable to attack once the attacker has access to the design netlist either through reverse engineering or through an untrusted fabrication facility. We introduce soft embedded FPGA redaction, a hardware obfuscation approach that allows the designer substitute security-critical IP blocks within a design with a synthesizable eFPGA fabric. This method fully conceals the logic and the routing of the critical IP and is compatible with standard ASIC flows for easy integration and process portability. To demonstrate eFPGA redaction, we obfuscate a RISC-V control path and a GPS P-code generator. We also show that the modified netlists are resilient to SAT attacks with moderate VLSI overheads. The secure RISC-V design has 1.89x area and 2.36x delay overhead while the GPS design has 1.39x area and negligible delay overhead when implemented on an industrial 22nm FinFET CMOS process.