1. Prospective evaluation of p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology for managing women with abnormal Papanicolaou cytology: PALMS study results
- Author
-
Dietmar Schmidt, Mario Sideri, Karin Denton, Christine Bergeron, Francisco Alameda, Thomas Keller, Johannes Bogers, Ruediger Ridder, Susanne Rehm, and H. Ikenberg
- Subjects
Gynecology ,Colposcopy ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Prevalence ,Papanicolaou stain ,Cancer ,Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia ,medicine.disease ,Oncology ,Cytology ,Biopsy ,Cohort ,medicine ,business - Abstract
BACKGROUND Testing for the presence of the human papillomavirus (HPV) is widely accepted for triaging Papanicolaou cytology results categorized as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US). In contrast, HPV testing has limited use in triaging cytological low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs) due to prevalence rates of typically >80%. In the current study, the authors assessed the diagnostic performance of p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology in triaging ASC-US and LSIL cases within the prospective, multicentric Primary ASC-US LSIL Marker Study (PALMS). METHODS A total of 575 ASC-US cases and 529 LSIL cases from a cohort of 27,349 women who were prospectively enrolled into the PALMS study in 5 European countries were tested with p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology and Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) HPV testing. Colposcopy-guided biopsy results of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) were used as clinical endpoints. RESULTS p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology demonstrated comparable (ASC-US: 94.4% for dual-stained cytology vs 100% for HC2 testing; P = .317) or lower (LSIL: 85.7% for dual-stained cytology vs 98.4% for HC2 testing; P = .005) sensitivity for CIN2+, but higher levels of specificity compared with HC2 HPV testing in both ASC-US (78.7% vs 60.4%; P
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF