Search

Construction sites require heightened safety measures due to hazardous working conditions. Health and Safety (H&S) standards in the Indian construction sector are notably subpar. Despite this stark reality, Indian researchers have paid scant attention to H&S concerns. Recognizing the critical dimensions is pivotal for enhancing on-site H&S. Thus. This study endeavours to identify the key aspects and factors influencing H&S at job sites within the Indian construction industry to prompt similar investigations in other developing countries. The research employed a pilot-tested questionnaire survey methodology to validate dimensions derived from existing literature. Following the compilation of a final set of 61 dimensions, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was applied for analysis. Among the original 61 dimensions, 35 were identified as significant and categorized into four main factors: Management Regulatory Factor (MRF), Worker’s Self-Regulatory Factor (WSRF), Workplace Regulatory Factor (WRF), and Government Regulatory Factor (GRF) with Cronbach’s Alpha 0.946, 0.892, 0.782 and 0.773 showing reliability level of excellent, good, acceptable and acceptable respectively which provides a theoretical framework. The study’s outcomes can aid decision-makers, top management, and workers in comprehending H&S and its practical implementation. Additionally, the results may encourage developing countries to institute H&S governance for on-site safety. For future studies in the Indian construction sector, exploring these factors through Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) is recommended. Based on the dimensions and factors identified in this research, a model utilizing structural equation modelling (SEM), or a Path Model could be devised. It is also advised that emerging nations conduct further research in this direction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Risk Governance pre-assessment stage is crucial in controversial activities, e.g. offshore oil industry. • Risk Governance models should not be transferred between different social, cultural and geopolitical contexts. • The North Sea risk governance institutional framework and culture can hardly fit Eastern Mediterranean countries. • Adopting "best practices" everywhere is not a panacea. • International conventions should take into account the diversity of cultural and geopolitical contexts. This paper presents and discusses actual and potential successes and failures in the transition of the Offshore Oil Industry from the risk management paradigm to the risk governance regime in three reference countries, namely the United Kingdom (UK) & Norway in the North and Greece in the South of Europe. The methodological approaches used in this research are both theoretical and empirical, such as: (a) a literature review on the transition from the Risk Analysis and Management to the Risk Governance paradigm; (b) a historical analysis of the institutional framework holding for Health and safety (H&S) at sea in connection with major disasters or accidents as milestone events; (c) analyses of the three countries' experiences and prospects regarding transition of their offshore oil industry to the risk governance model. Among the findings of the study is the necessity for a thorough review of the European Union (EU) legal framework in the area of Risk Governance at sea in order to take account of the cultural, socio-economic and geopolitical diversity among its Sea Regions. Mere transfer of the "best practices" from the European North to the South may create more tension, and may entail new or invigorate pre-existing geopolitical risks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The offshore wind industry is growing rapidly around the world. Many governments have set ambitious targets for growth to achieve their decarbonisation goals. As the industry grows it can become more challenging to build and operate wind farms safely. Wind farms are being constructed further from shore in tougher weather and sea conditions. In the UK, the Health and Safety Executive has raised concerns about safety performance. This paper aims to review the current state of health and safety in the offshore wind industry. It reviews the latest research, injury statistics and the state of legislation covering the sector. It also considers how the risk profile of the industry may change in coming years. The paper finds there is a need for more research specific to the safety challenges of offshore wind. Injury rate statistics show that performance is 3–4 times worse than comparable industries, and industry reports do not currently include large parts of the sector. Rapid growth and the implementation of new technologies will create additional challenges. Regulators should consider the implementation of industry specific safety legislation to manage the unique challenges of offshore wind. [Display omitted] • Injury rates are up to 4 times higher than the offshore oil and gas industry. • Risk exposure to workers is expected to increase due to growth and technology. • Safety legislation requires reform to address specific industry risks. • Innovations from other industries in safety management should be adopted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate causal agents of health and safety (H&S) incidents among “plant-trailers” (as used by construction and utility contractors to transport mechanical machinery); including the relationship(s) of such incidents to routine safety inspections and, plant maintenance functions. Design/methodology/approach – H&S plant-trailer incident data, from a collaborating UK-based case study utility company are analysed using inductive, interpretative and descriptive statistical methods. Findings – Principal incident occurrences relate to trailer wheels, wheel bearings, tyres and braking systems. All forms of incidents observed harbour significant risk and especially, if they occur during travel on public highways. Derived recommendations for incident mitigation and control, suggest a requirement for improved human behaviour, machinery inspection regimes and maintenance systems. Research limitations/implications – The findings will be valuable to academia as a basis for advancing this new research subject, both empirically and internationally. Direction is offered in this respect. Practical implications – Recommendations will be of practical relevance to machinery management practitioners generally and to plant-trailer stakeholders more specifically. For the latter, the study encourages introspective consideration of plant-trailer H&S systems. Originality/value – No previous research has targeted these issues relating to plant-trailers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]