Search

STUDY DESIGN.: Retrospective cohort analysis of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE.: The purpose of this study is to report health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes in patients 75 years of age and older who underwent one- to two-level instrumented posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: HRQOL measures are increasingly used to measure clinical success after spinal surgery. There is limited data available to guide the clinician caring for the growing geriatric population with degenerative lumbar spine conditions. METHODS.: From a database of prospectively collected HRQOL measures in patients undergoing instrumented lumbar arthrodesis, we identified 35 patients 75 years of age and older who underwent one- or two-level instrumented posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis who had complete preoperative and 2-year postoperative data. HRQOL measures included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form-36 Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS), and back and leg pain numerical rating scales. Paired sample t tests were used to compare preoperative and 2-year postoperative scores. The percentage of patients reaching previously established thresholds for Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and Substantial Clinical Benefit (SCB) were calculated. RESULTS.: There were 11 men and 24 women with a mean age of 78.3 years (range 75-85). Diagnoses included stenosis (20), spondylolisthesis (12), instability (1), disc pathology (1), and scoliosis (1). Twelve patients (34%) had complications, 8 (23%) major and 4 (11%) minor. There was a statistically significant improvement in all of the HRQOL measures from preoperative to 2-years postoperative. Sixty percent (21 of 35) of the patients reached the MCID threshold for ODI, PCS, and leg pain, whereas 83% (29 of 35) reached the MCID for back pain. More than half of the patients reached the SCB threshold for leg pain (19 of 35, 54%), back pain (21 of 35, 60%), ODI (19 of 35, 54%), and PCS (21 of 35, 60%). CONCLUSIONS.: Properly selected patients 75 years of age and older can achieve substantial clinical improvements, based on patient reported HRQOL measures, 2 years after one- and two-level instrumented posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

STUDY DESIGN: Comparative study. OBJECTIVE: To compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing extension of a previous idiopathic scoliosis fusion to the sacrum using either autogenous bone graft or recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Extension of an existing idiopathic scoliosis fusion to the sacrum for distal degeneration or sagittal imbalance has been associated with a high rate of pseudarthrosis. We hypothesized that rhBMP-2 could be successfully used as a substitute for distant autograft in this challenging population. METHODS: Consecutive patients were identified from a single institution prospective database. The control group (autogenous harvesting without rhBMP-2, 1998-2002) included 24 of 25 patients with minimum 2-year follow-up while the study group (rhBMP-2 without distant autograft, 2002-2006) included 36 of 39 patients with minimum 2-year follow-up. Radiographs were measured using standard adult deformity criteria. Fusions were evaluated by independent observers using a published 4-point scale. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using Scoliosis Research Society and Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaires. RESULTS: Groups were well matched with respect to demographic, radiographic, and surgical data with the following exceptions: the control group (autogenous graft, no BMP) was younger (43.5 vs. 49.8 years; P = 0.04), had more anterior levels fused (3.3 vs. 1.7; P = 0.01), more thoracoabdominal approaches (25% vs. 2.7%; P = 0.01), and greater estimated blood loss (1938 vs. 1221 mL; P = 0.01). There was 1 wound complication (deep infection) in each group. Rates of radiographic pseudarthrosis (11.1% vs. 20.8%) and revision for pseudarthrosis (5.6% vs. 12.5%) were lower in the rhBMP-2 group, although this did not reach statistical significance. Preoperative, postoperative, and improvements in Scoliosis Research Society and Oswestry Disability Index scores were similar between groups. We did not observe any increase in adverse events with the use of rhBMP-2. CONCLUSION: BMP-2 is a safe and effective alternative to iliac or rib harvesting when extending an existing idiopathic scoliosis fusion to the sacrum. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Case-control study., Objective: To introduce a classification system that will include the major types of degenerative changes and failures related to the proximal junction, and to determine the clinical course and characteristics for the different types of proximal junctional degeneration., Background: Proximal junctional kyphosis and failures are well recognized after adult spinal fusion; however, a standardized classification is lacking., Materials and Methods: The proposed system identified 4 different patterns of proximal junctional degeneration: (1) Type 1 (multilevel symmetrical collapse), (2) Type 2 (single adjacent level collapse), (3) Type 3 (fracture), and (4) Type 4 (spondylolisthesis). A single-center database was reviewed from 2018 to 2021. Patients 18 years or older of age, who underwent posterior spinal fusion of ≥3 levels with an upper instrumented vertebral level between T8 and L2, and a follow-up of ≥2 years were included. Radiographic measurements, revision surgery, and time to revision were the primary outcomes., Results: One hundred fifty patients were included with a mean age of 65.1 (±9.8) years and a mean follow-up of 3.2 (±1) years. Sixty-nine patients (46%) developed significant degenerative changes in the proximal junction and were classified accordingly. Twenty (13%) were type 1, 17 (11%) were type 2, 22 (15%) were type 3, and 10 (7%) were type 4. Type 3 had a significantly shorter time to revision with a mean of 0.9 (±0.9) years. Types 3 and 4 had greater preoperative sagittal vertical axis, and types 1 and 3 had greater final follow-up lumbar lordosis. Bone density measured by Hounsfield units showed lower measurements for type 3. Types 1 and 4 had lower rates of developing proximal junctional kyphosis. Type 1 had the lowest revision rate with 40% (types 2, 3, and 4 were 77%, 73%, and 80%, respectively, P = 0.045)., Conclusion: This novel classification system defines different modes of degeneration and failures at the proximal junction, and future studies with larger sample sizes are needed for validation., Level of Evidence: Level III., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Secondary data analysis of the NIH sponsored study on Adult Symptomatic Lumbar Scoliosis (ASLS)., Objectives: The purpose of this study is to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing operative versus non-operative care for ASLS eight years after enrollment., Summary of Background Data: A prior cost-effectiveness analysis of the current cohort comparing operative to non-operative care at five years after enrollment showed and ICER of $44,033 in the As-Treated analysis and a ICER of $27,480 in the Intent-to-treat analysis., Methods: Data was collected every three months for the first two years, then every six months for the remainder of the study. Data included use of non-operative modalities, medications and employment status. Costs for index and revision surgeries and non-operative modalities were determined using Medicare Allowable rates. Medication costs were determined using the RedBook and indirect costs were calculated based on reported employment status and income. Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY) was determined using the SF6D., Results: There were 101 cases in the Operative (Op) and 103 in the Non-operative (Non-Op) group with complete eight year data. Thirty-eight patients (37%) in the Non-Op group had surgery from 3 to 72 months after enrollment. An As-Treated analysis including only cases who never had surgery (N=65) or cases with complete eight-year post-operative data (N=101) showed that operative treatment was favored with an ICER of $20,569 per QALY gained which is within Willingness-to-Pay (WTP) thresholds. An Intent-to-Treat analysis demonstrated greater QALY gains and lower cost in the Op group (ICER = $-13,911). However, Intent-to-Treat analysis is influenced by Non-Op patients who crossed over to operative treatment at variable times during follow-up., Conclusion: Operative treatment was more cost-effective than non-operative treatment for ASLS at eight-year follow-up. The ICER continued to improve as compared to the five-year values ($20,569 vs. $44,033)., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Diagnostic accuracy study., Objective: To establish a simple method of phantomless bone mineral density (BMD) measurement by using preoperative lumbar Computed Tomography (CT) scans, and compare the accuracy of reference tissue combinations to diagnose low BMD against uncalibrated Hounsfield units (HUs)., Summary of Background Data: HUs are used as a measure of BMD; however, associations between HU and T-scores vary widely. Quantitative CT (qCT) scans are more accurate, but they require density calibration with an object of known density (phantom), which limits feasibility. As an emerging technique, phantomless (internal) calibration of routine CT scans may provide a good opportunity for screening., Methods: Patients who were scheduled to undergo lumbar surgery, with a preoperative CT scan, and a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan within six months were included. Four tissues were selected for calibration: subcutaneous adipose (A), erector spinae (ES), psoas (P) and aortic blood (AB). The HUs of these tissues were used in linear regression against ground-truth values. Calibrations were performed by using two different internal tissues at a time to maintain simplicity and in-office applicability.Volumetric bone mineral densities (vBMD) derived from internally calibrated CT scans were analyzed for new threshold values for low bone density. Areas under the curve (AUC) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI)., Results: 45 patients were included (M/F=10/35, mean age:63.3). Calibrated vBMDs had stronger correlations with DXA T-scores when compared with HUs, with L2 exhibiting the highest coefficients. Calibration by using A and ES with the threshold of 162 mg/cm3 had a sensitivity of 90% in detecting low BMD (AUC=0.671)., Conclusions: This novel method allows simple, in-office calibration of routine preoperative CT scans without the use of a phantom. Calibration using adipose and erector spinae with a threshold of 162 mg/cm3 is proposed for low bone density screening with high sensitivity (90%)., Level of Evidence: Level III., Competing Interests: CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES: RMC, LYC: No relationships to disclosie. CHC: Consulting: Medtronic, NuVasive. SDG: Consulting: K2M / Stryker, Medtronic, Proprio, DePuy. JRD: Consulting: DePuy, Icotec, Stryker; Other. JLG: Consulting: Acuity, DePuy, FYR, Medtronic, NuVasive, Stryker; Royalties: Acuity, Medtronic, NuVasive; Stock Ownership: CingulaterTherapeutics (<1%); Trips/Travel: Baxter, Broadwater, MiMedx, Pacira Pharmaceuticals. MD: Consulting: Medtronic Sofamor Danek, NuVasive; Royalties: Medtronic, NuVasive. CHC, SDG, JRD, JLG, MD, LYC: (Grants to Institution): Alan L. & Jacqueline B. Stuart Spine Research, Scoliosis Research Society, Biom’up, Cerapedics, Inc, Empirical Spine Inc, Medtronic, National Spine Health Foundation, Stryker, (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Retrospective review., Objectives: To determine if change in position of upper instrumented vertebral (UIV) screw between intraoperative prone and immediate postoperative standing radiographs is a predictor for proximal junctional kyphosis or failure (PJK/PJF)., Summary of Background Data: Cranially directed UIV screws on post-operative radiographs have been found to be associated with PJK. Change in the screw position between intraoperative and immediate postoperative radiographs has not been studied., Methods: Patients with posterior fusion ≥3 levels and UIV at or distal to T8, and minimum 2-year follow-up were identified from a single center database. Primary outcomes were radiographic PJK/PJF or revision for PJK/PJF. Demographic, surgical and radiographic variables, including intraoperative screw-vertebra (S-V) angle, change in S-V angle, direction of UIV screw (cranial-neutral-caudal) and rod-vertebra (R-V) angle were collected., Results: 143 cases from 110 patients were included with a mean age of 62.9 years and a follow-up of 3.5 years. 54 (38%) cases developed PJK/PJF, of whom 30 required a revision. Mean S-V angle was -0.9°±5.5° intraoperative and -2.8°±5.5° postoperative. The group with PJK/PJF had a mean S-V angle change of -2.5°±2.4 while the rest had a change of -1.0°±1.6 (P=0.010). When the change in S-V angle was <5°, 33% developed PJK, this increased to 80% when it was ≥5° (P=0.001). Revision for PJK/PJF increased from 16% to 60% when S-V angle changed ≥5° (P=0.001). Regression analysis showed S-V angle change as a significant risk factor for PJK/PJF (P=0.047, OR=1.58) and for revision due to PJK/PJF (P=0.009, OR=2.21)., Conclusions: Change in the S-V angle from intraop prone to immediate postop standing radiograph is a strong predictor for PJK/PJF and for revision. For each degree of S-V angle change, odds of revision for PJK/PJF increases by 2.2x. A change of 5° should alert the surgeon to the likely development of PJK/PJF requiring revision., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Workflow for cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws includes tapping line-to-line or under tapping by 1 mm. We describe a non-tapping, two-step workflow for CBT screw placement, and compare the safety profile and time savings to the Tap (three-step) workflow. Patients undergoing robotic assisted 1-3 level posterior fusion with CBT screws for degenerative conditions were identified and separated into either a No-Tap or Tap workflow. Number of total screws, screw-related complications, estimated blood loss, operative time, robotic time, and return to the operating room were collected and analyzed. There were 91 cases (458 screws) in the No-Tap and 88 cases (466 screws) in the Tap groups, with no difference in demographics, revision status, ASA grade, approach, number of levels fused or diagnosis between cohorts. Total robotic time was lower in the No-Tap (26.7 min) versus the Tap group (30.3 min, p = 0.053). There was no difference in the number of malpositioned screws identified intraoperatively (10 vs 6, p = 0.427), screws converted to freehand (3 vs 3, p = 0.699), or screws abandoned (3 vs 2, p = 1.000). No pedicle/pars fracture or fixation failure was seen in the No-Tap cohort and one in the Tap cohort (p = 1.00). No patients in either cohort were returned to OR for malpositioned screws. This study showed that the No-Tap screw insertion workflow for robot-assisted CBT reduces robotic time without increasing complications., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Study Design: Prospective observational cohort., Objectives: To examine the cost-effectiveness of IntraOperative ElectroMyeloGraphy (IO-EMG) by evaluating how often an abnormal IO-EMG signal changed the surgeon's surgical plan, or replaced a pedicle screw either intra-operatively or as a second unplanned surgery., Methods: Patients undergoing instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion were monitored with intraoperative triggered EMG's. Pedicle screws were placed freehand from L1 to S1 by attending physicians and fellows. Concern for pedicle breach was a screw stimulation<10 mA., Results: There were 145 cases with a total of 725 pedicle screws placed. Mean age was 57.8 ± 14.2 yrs, OR time was 238 ± 95 minutes, EBL was 426.8 ± 354.3cc. Mean number of surgical levels fused was 2.7 ± 1.1. 686 (95%) screws stimulated at >10 mA and 39 (5%) screws stimulated at <10 mA. All 39 screws were removed and pedicles re-examined. Intraoperative screw repositioning was necessary in 8 of 145 cases (6%). No patient required a return to the OR for screw repositioning. As a worst case cost analysis, assuming the 8 patients requiring intraoperative screw positioning would have returned to the OR at a cost of $11,798 per readmission, the per patient cost is $651 which is less than the ION per patient cost of $750., Conclusions: Only 1% of the 725 lumbar pedicle screws placed in 8 of 145 cases required repositioning. Due to the infrequency of pedicle wall breaches and the cost of ION, the utility of this modality in straightforward lumbar fusions should be critically evaluated., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) can be treated with instrumented fusion, but the number of anchors needed for optimal correction is controversial., Methods: We conducted a multicenter, randomized study that included patients undergoing spinal fusion for single thoracic curves between 45° and 65°, the most common form of operatively treated AIS. Of the 211 patients randomized, 108 were assigned to a high-density screw pattern and 103, to a low-density screw pattern. Surgeons were instructed to use ≥1.8 implants per spinal level fused for patients in the high-implant-density group or ≤1.4 implants per spinal level fused for patients in the low-implant-density group. The primary outcome measure was the percent correction of the coronal curve at the 2-year follow-up. The power analysis for this trial required 174 patients to show equivalence, defined as a 95% confidence interval (CI) within a ±10% correction margin with a probability of 90%., Results: In the intention-to-treat analysis, the mean percent correction of the coronal curve was equivalent between the high-density and low-density groups at the 2-year follow-up (67.6% versus 65.7%; difference, -1.9% [95% CI: -6.1%, 2.2%]). In the per-protocol cohorts, the mean percent correction of the coronal curve was also equivalent between the 2 groups at the 2-year follow-up (65.0% versus 66.1%; difference, 1.1% [95% CI: -3.0%, 5.2%]). A total of 6 patients in the low-density group and 5 patients in the high-density group required reoperation (p = 1.0)., Conclusions: In the setting of spinal fusion for primary thoracic AIS curves between 45° and 65°, the percent coronal curve correction obtained with use of a low-implant-density construct and that obtained with use of a high-implant-density construct were equivalent., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article ( http://links.lww.com/JBJS/H763 )., (Copyright © 2023 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Background Context: Postoperative incisional concerns including nonpurulent drainage are relatively common following spine surgery. Evidence-based management protocols are lacking., Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine if prescribing empiric oral antibiotics for nonpurulent wound drainage is beneficial for the prevention of chronic infection or reoperation., Study Design: Retrospective chart review., Patient Sample: Patients calling the office with postsurgical wound concerns., Outcome Measures: Not applicable., Methods: In a large, multisurgeon, spine surgery practice, a review of the communications log showed that 298 patients called or messaged the office with a concern regarding postoperative nonpurulent wound drainage. Patients were prescribed empiric oral antibiotics based on surgeon preference. Patients who received empiric oral antibiotic treatment (AbxTx) were propensity matched to patients who did not (No AbxTx) based on sex, age, BMI, ASA grade, smoking status, prior spine surgery, anatomic location, and number of surgical levels. The number of patients requiring surgical intervention (debridement) and/or developing a chronic infection was determined., Results: Oral antibiotics were prescribed for 112 of the 298 (38%) patients with reports of nonpurulent drainage. Demographic and surgical characteristics of the two matched cohorts were similar. Although there were more patients in the AbxTx group who required surgical intervention (n=17, 17%) compared to the No AbxTx group (n=9, 9%), this difference was not statistically significant (p=.139). The intra-operative culture results showed no growth in 94% (16/17) of the AbxTx group vs 67% (6/9) of the No AbxTx group (p=.103). One patient in each group required a return to the operating room within the year after the initial surgical debridement for management of chronic infection., Conclusion: In this large series (n=298) of patients with nonpurulent wound drainage following spine surgery, 87% resolved without the need for surgical intervention. Empiric oral antibiotics did not reduce the need for surgical intervention or the development of a chronic infection. In addition to the added cost, potential adverse reactions, development of resistant organisms, and inaccurate labeling of surgical site infection; empiric oral antibiotics may lead to a negative intraoperative culture for those requiring surgical intervention impacting the ability to prescribe a specific antibiotic regimen., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest One or more of the authors declare financial or professional relationships on ICMJE-TSJ disclosure forms., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Longitudinal observational comparative cohorts., Objective: The objective of this study is to compare 3 and 12-month radiographic sagittal parameters and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients who underwent 3-level ACDF or a hybrid procedure., Summary of Background Data: Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF), Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion (ACCF), and hybrids (combination ACCF-ACDF) are common procedures used to treat symptomatic cervical spondylosis. Although there is a relative abundance of literature comparing 1-level ACCF versus 2-level ACDF and 2-level ACCF versus 3-level ACDF, detailed comparisons of 3-level ACDF versus hybrid procedures have not been extensively addressed., Methods: Patients who underwent a 3-Level ACDF (3L-ACDF, N=47) or 1-Level Corpectomy/1-Level ACDF (Hybrid, N=52) with at least a 12-month post-op data available were identified. Standard demographic, surgical and PROs were collected in addition to preoperative and postoperative radiographic data, including C2 plumb line (C2PL), C2-C7 lordosis (CL), segmental lordosis (SL), and T1 slope (T1S)., Results: The 2 cohorts were similar in terms of demographics. At 3 months post-op, CL (9.04° vs. -2.12°, P =0.00) and SL (6.06° vs. -2.26°, P =0.003) were significantly greater in the 3L-ACDF group versus the HYBRID group. This significant difference was maintained at 12 months postoperative for CL [(6.62° vs. -0.60°, P =0.015) but not for SL (2.36° vs. -1.09°, P =0.199)]. There were no differences in PROs between the 2 groups before surgery, at 3 months postoperative or 12 months postoperative. Seven patients required revision surgery in the 1-year study period (1 in the 3L-ACDF, and 6 in the Hybrid P <0.001)., Conclusions: Three level ACDF resulted in greater C2-C7 lordosis and segmental lordosis postoperatively, which was maintained at 1 year for cervical lordosis. While PROs were similar between the groups, patients with hybrid instrumentation required significantly more revision surgeries than those treated with 3-level ACDF., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Previous studies demonstrated an increase in adverse outcomes for patients undergoing elective surgeries with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus. At a large, tertiary-care spine center with a notable population of patients with poorly controlled diabetes, an Endocrinology Fast-Track (EFT) program was developed to improve patient optimization before elective spine surgery. The purpose of this study was to report our early experience., Methods: Seventy-five patients who were scheduled for elective spine surgery were noted to have Hgb A1c > 7 on preoperative evaluation. Thirty-two patients accepted referral to the EFT program and 43 declined (non-EFT). Mean preoperative Hgb A1c was similar between groups (EFT: 8.79 versus non-EFT: 9.26, P = 0.221). The Fast-Track program included counseling, education, and medical management., Results: Patients in the two groups were similar in number of females (EFT: 17 versus non-EFT: 17, P = 0.348), age (EFT: 57.7 versus non-EFT: 60.6, P = 0.280), and body mass index (EFT: 34.6 versus non-EFT: 33.0, P = 0.341). A smaller number of smokers were there in the EFT group (1) compared with the non-EFT group (15, P = 0.003). The proportion of patients on insulin (EFT: 19 versus non-EFT: 23, P = 0.814) and oral hypoglycemics (EFT: 29 versus non-EFT: 39, P = 0.983) was similar between the two groups. Surgical clearance for patients with a documented preoperative Hgb A1c of < 7 or equivalent fructosamine level was significantly better in the Fast-Track group compared with the non-Fast-Track group (91% versus 42%, P = 0.000). Although most patients who declined the Fast-Track program did not obtain clearance for surgery, mean Hgb A1c was improved at the latest follow-up in both groups for those who obtained surgical clearance (7.10 versus 6.78, P = 0.470)., Discussion: A novel EFT program was successful in obtaining acceptable blood glucose control in patients recommended for spine surgery who had poorly controlled diabetes mellitus on preoperative evaluation. The improved blood glucose control was maintained at the latest follow-up., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Background: Novel methods of bone density assessment using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been increasingly reported in the spine surgery literature. Correlations between these newer measurements and traditional Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) is not well known. The purpose of this study is to perform an updated systematic review of correlations between bone mineral density (BMD) from CT or MRI and DEXA., Methods: Articles published between 2011 and 2021 that reported correlations between the CT-HU or MRI measurements to DEXA t-scores or BMD of lumbar spine or hip were included in this systematic review., Results: A total of 25 studies (15 CT, 10 MRI) met the inclusion criteria with a total number of 2,745 patients. The pooled correlation coefficient of spine CT-HU versus spine DEXA, spine CT-HU versus hip DEXA and spine CT-HU versus lowest t-score were 0.60, 0.50 and 0.60 respectively. Regarding spine DEXA parameters, the pooled r 2 for spine CT-HU versus spine t-score was 0.684 and spine CT-HU versus spine BMD was 0.598. Furthermore, in patients undergoing spine surgery in four studies, the pooled correlation between spine CT and spine DEXA was (r 2 : 0.64). In MRI studies, the pooled r 2 of spine MRI versus spine DEXA and spine MRI versus hip DEXA were -0.41 and -0.44 respectively., Conclusions: CT-HU has stronger correlations with DEXA than MRI measurements. Lumbar CT-HU has the highest pooled correlation (r 2  = 0.6) with both spine DEXA and lowest skeletal t-score followed by lumbar CT-HU with hip DEXA (r 2  = 0.5) and lumbar MRI with hip (r 2  = 0.44) and spine (r 2  = 0.41) DEXA. Both imaging modalities achieved only a moderate correlation with DEXA. Few studies in both modalities have investigated the correlation in spine surgery populations and the available data shows that the correlations are worse in the degenerative spine population. A careful interruption of CT HU and MRI measurement when evaluation of BMD as they only moderately correlated with DEXA scores. At this time, it is unclear which modality is a better predictor of mechanical complications and clinical outcomes in spine surgery patients., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2023 The Author(s).)

Background: Controversy exists regarding the ability of posterior (transforaminal) lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF/TLIF) to achieve lordosis. We hypothesized that an interbody device (IBD) designed for positioning in the anterior disc space produces greater lordosis than IBDs designed for straight-in positioning. The purpose of this study is to determine if using either an anterior-position or straight-in position IBD design were associated with successful achievement of postoperative lordosis., Methods: A consecutive series of patients undergoing a undergoing a single-level, posterior open midline (transforaminal) lumbar interbody fusion procedure for degenerative spine conditions during a time period when the two types of interbody devices were being used at surgeon discretion were identified from a multi-surgeon academic training center. Patient demographics and radiographic measures including surgical level lordosis (SLL), anterior disc height, middle disc height, posterior disc height, IBD height, and IBD insertion depth were measured on preop, immediate postop, and one-year postop standing radiographs using PACS. Group comparison and regression analysis were performed using SPSS., Results: Sixty-one patients were included (n=37 anterior, n=34 straight-in). Mean age was 59.8±8.7 years, 32 (52%) were female. There was no difference between IBD type (anterior vs. straight-in) for mean Pre-op SLL (19±7° vs. 20±6°, p=0.7), Post-op SLL (21±5° vs 21±6°, p=0.5), or Change in SLL (2±4° vs. 1±5°, p=0.2). Regression analysis showed that Pre-op SLL was the only variable associated with Change in SLL (Beta = negative 0.48, p=0.000). While the mean Change in SLL could be considered clinically insignificant, there was wide variability: from a loss of 9° to a gain of 13°. Gain of lordosis >5° only occurred when Pre-op SLL was <21°, and loss of lordosis >5° only occurred when Pre-op SLL was >21°., Conclusions: While group averages showed an insignificant change in segmental lordosis following a posterior (transforaminal) interbody fusion regardless of interbody device type, pre-operative lordosis was correlated with a clinically significant change in segmental lordosis. Preoperative hypolordotic discs were more likely to gain significant lordosis, while preoperative hyperlordotic discs were more likely to lose significant lordosis. Surgeon awareness of this tendency can help guide surgical planning and technique., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2022 The Author(s).)

Patients with advanced pyogenic spondylodiscitis can present with neurologic deficits. However, the prevalence, severity, and outcome of the neurologic deficits are not well known. A systematic review was performed to improve the knowledge of this commonly encountered clinical scenario. The considerable number of severe neurologic deficits in addition to their poor recovery, even after surgical intervention, demonstrates that the early diagnosis of pyogenic spondylodiscitis is crucial. Prompt surgical intervention is likely associated with a greater chance of improvement of neurologic status than nonsurgical treatment., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: With the current opioid crisis, as many as 38% of patients are still on opioids one year after elective spine surgery. Identifying drivers of in-hospital opioid consumption may decrease subsequent opioid dependence. We aimed to identify the drivers of in-hospital opioid consumption in patients undergoing 1-2-level instrumented lumbar fusions., Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. Electronic medical record analysts identified consecutive patients undergoing 1-2 level instrumented lumbar fusions for degenerative lumbar conditions from 2016 to 2018 from a single-center hospital administrative database. Oral, intravenous, and transdermal opioid dose administrations were converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Linear regression analysis was used to determine associations between postoperative day (POD) 4 cumulative in-hospital MMEs and the patients' baseline characteristics including body mass index (BMI), race, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, smoking status, marital status, insurance type, zip code, number of fused levels, approach and preoperative opioid use., Results: A total of 1,502 patients were included. The mean cumulative MMEs at POD 4 was 251.5. Linear regression analysis yielded four drivers including younger age, preoperative opioid use, current smokers and more levels fused. There were no associations with surgical approach, zip code, ASA grade, marital status, BMI, race or insurance type., Conclusions: Use of preoperative opioids and smoking are modifiable risk factors for higher in-hospital opioid consumption and can be targets for intervention prior to surgery in order to decrease in-hospital opioid use., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jss-20-626). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2021 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: The opioid epidemic is at epic proportions currently in the United States. Exposure to opioids for surgery and subsequent postoperative pain management is a known risk factor for opioid dependence. In addition, opioids can have a negative impact on multiple aspects including clinical outcomes, length of hospital stay, and overall cost of care. Thus, the greatest effort to reduce perioperative opioid use is necessary and a multimodal pain control (MMPC) has been gaining popularity. However, its efficacy in spine surgery is not well known. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a MMPC protocol in patients undergoing lumbar single-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF)., Methods: This is a retrospective comparative study. From a prospective, single-surgeon, surgical database, consecutive patients undergoing single-level ALIF with or without subsequent posterior fusion for degenerative lumbar conditions were identified before and after initiation of the MMPC protocol. The MMPC protocol consisted of a preoperative oral regimen of cyclobenzaprine (10 mg), gabapentin (600 mg), acetaminophen (1 g), and methadone (10 mg). Postoperatively they received a bilateral transverse abdominis plane block with 0.5% Ropivacaine prior to extubation. We compared in-hospital opioid consumption between the MMPC and non-MMPC cohorts as well as baseline demographic, the length of hospital stay, cost, and rate of postoperative ileus. Opioid consumption was calculated and normalized to the morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs)., Results: In total, 68 patients in the MMPC cohort and 39 in the non-MMPC cohort were identified. There was no difference in baseline demographics including sex, body mass index, smoking status, or preoperative opioid use between the two groups. Although there was no difference in the MMEs on the day of surgery (58.5 vs. 66.9, P=0.387), cumulative MMEs each day after surgery was significantly lower in the MMPC cohort, with final cumulative MMEs being reduced by 62% (120.2 vs. 314.8, P<0.001). There was no difference in postoperative ileus, length of stay, and hospital costs., Conclusions: The use of a MMPC protocol in patients undergoing single-level ALIF for degenerative conditions reduced opioid consumption starting on the first day after surgery, resulting in a cumulative reduction of 62%., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jss-20-629). Dr. JLG reports personal fees from Acuity, personal fees from Medtronic, personal fees from DePuy, personal fees from Alphatec, from Stryker, from Acuity, from K2M, from NuVasive, personal fees from Pfizer, outside the submitted work; Dr. CHC 3rd reports personal fees from Alphatec, personal fees from Medtronic, personal fees from NuVasive, personal fees from Alphatec, personal fees from Medtronic, personal fees from Titan, personal fees from SRS Committee, personal fees from NASS Committee, outside the submitted work; Dr. MD reports personal fees from Medtronic, personal fees from NuVasive, outside the submitted work; Dr. RKO 2nd reports personal fees from Medtronic, personal fees from NuVasive, grants from Pfizer, grants from Texas Scottish Rite Hospital, grants from Alan L. & Jacqueline B. Stuart Spine Research, grants from Cerapedics, grants from SRS, grants from Medtronic, grants from OREF, grants from ISSG, outside the submitted work; Dr. JRD 2nd reports personal fees from Medtronic, personal fees from DePuy, other from Federation Of Spine Association, other from SRS, personal fees from Pfizer, outside the submitted work; Dr. SDG reports personal fees from Medtronic, outside the submitted work; Dr. LYC reports personal fees from AO spine, personal fees from Center for Spine Surgery and Research of the University of Southern Denmark, personal fees from University of Louisville Institutional Review Board, grants from Scoliosis Research Society Research, grants from Orthopedic Educational Research Fund, grants from Integra, grants from Pfizer, personal fees from Pfizer, outside the submitted work. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2020 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Longitudinal comparative cohort., Objective: The purpose of this study is to report on the cost-effectiveness of surgical versus non-surgical treatment for Adult Symptomatic Lumbar Scoliosis (ASLS) using the as-treated data and provide a comparison to previously reported intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Adult spinal deformity is a relatively prevalent condition for which surgical treatment has become increasingly common but concerns surrounding complications, revision rates and cost-effectiveness remain unresolved. Of these issues, cost-effectiveness is perhaps the most difficult to quantify as the requisite data is difficult to obtain. The purpose of this study is to report on the cost-effectiveness of surgical versus non-surgical treatment for ASLS using the as-treated data and provide a comparison to previously reported ITT analysis., Methods: Patients with at least 5-year follow-up data within the same treatment arm were included. Data collected every 3 months included use of nonoperative modalities, medications and employment status. Costs for surgeries and non-operative modalities were determined using Medicare Allowable rates. Medication costs were determined using the RedBook and indirect costs were calculated based on the reported employment status and income. Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY) was determined using the SF-6D., Results: Of 226 patients, 195 patients (73 Non-op, 122 Op) met inclusion criteria. At 5 years, 29 (24%) patients in the Op group had a revision surgery of whom two had two revisions and one had three revisions. The cumulative cost for the Op group was $111,451 with a cumulative QALY gain of 2.3. The cumulative cost for the Non-Op group was $29,124 with a cumulative QALY gain of 0.4. This results in an ICER of $44,033 in favor of Op treatment., Conclusion: This as-treated cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrates that surgical treatment for adult lumbar scoliosis becomes favorable at year-three, 1 year earlier than suggested by a previous intent-to-treat analysis., Level of Evidence: II.

Study Design: Secondary analysis of subjects in the control anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) arm of Medtronic Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) trials for cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA)., Objectives: To compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with radiographic nonunion to patients with a solid fusion., Summary of Background Data: The true prevalence of nonunion after ACDF is unknown. Nonunion may be under-reported, as some patients are not symptomatic enough to justify radiographic evaluation., Methods: Three hundred forty-five subjects enrolled in the control arm of IDE trials for CDA who had single-level ACDF with allograft and plate with 24 month data formed the study cohort. Using the 24-month postop evaluation, subjects were divided into those who had radiographic fusion and those who did not using strict study criteria. SF-36, NDI, Neck and Arm pain NRS scores were reported at 12, 24, 36, 60, and 84 months postop. For subjects who had secondary surgery failures, the last observations before the secondary surgery were carried forward to future visits for the analysis., Results: Forty-four (13%) patients had radiographic nonunion and 301 (87%) were fused at 24 months postop. At 24 months, PROs were similar between the two groups. Seven patients in the Nonunion group (16%) and 10 (3%) in the Fused group had additional surgery at the index level prior to the 24 follow-up (P = 0.003). Over the 84-month follow-up a total of 9 patients in the Nonunion group (21%) and 22 (7%) in the Fused group had additional surgery at the index level (P = 0.009)., Conclusion: While the radiographic nonunion rate at 24 months was 13%, PROs show that many of the radiographic nonunions were asymptomatic. Although the majority of patients with radiographic nonunion did not undergo additional surgery, the rate of secondary surgeries at the index level was significantly higher in the radiographic nonunion group., Level of Evidence: 2.

Background Context: Patients undergoing single-level posterior lumbar decompression and fusion (PLDF) usually do not need transfusions. However, patients undergoing two or three-level PLDF occasionally require transfusion postoperatively even when estimated blood loss (EBL) or blood loss from drains appears acceptable. Estimating the volume of HBL is critical in perioperative fluid management., Purpose: To determine the volume of hidden blood loss (HBL) in two- or three-level PLDF., Study Design: Single-center, multisurgeon, secondary analysis from a prospective randomized clinical trial of cell saver use., Patient Sample: Patients enrolled in a prospective randomized trial of cell saver undergoing two- or three-level PLDF were included in this analysis., Methods: Total blood loss was calculated using four estimation formulas including Bourke's, Gross', Camarasa's, and Lopez-Picado's formulas. HBL was determined by subtracting the visible loss (EBL and blood loss from drains) from the calculated total blood loss., Results: A total of 89 patients (36 males, mean age 62 years) were included. Seventy-five patients underwent open two-level fusion while 14 had three-level fusions. Intervertebral fusion was performed in 20 patients. Mean surgical time was 261 minutes, and EBL was 685 mL. Mean blood loss from drains was 824 mL. Seventy patients received allogenic blood whereas 47 cell saver blood reinfused intraoperatively. HBL was calculated to be 678 mL, 963 mL, 1,267 mL, and 819 mL using each formula., Conclusions: HBL following two or three-level PLDF was substantial and more than EBL. Postoperative management of blood loss should take HBL into account., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is a prevalent condition in individuals over the age of 65; leading to impaired standing balance and abnormal gait patterns. This functional impairment may be due to the fixed sagittal or coronal malalignment; associated spinal stenosis or deconditioning. The Berg balance scale (BBS) was developed to measure balance by assessing the performance of functional tasks. The purpose of this study is to determine if BBS is a useful metric for evaluating functional status in ASD patients., Methods: ASD patients who required fusion from the thoracic spine to the pelvis from 2014 to 2016 were enrolled and asked to complete the BBS prior to and six months after surgery. BBS were obtained by a certified physical therapist. Standard demographic; radiographic and surgical data were collected. The Oswestry disability index (ODI), EuroQOL-5D and numeric rating scales (0 to 10) for back and leg pain were assessed at baseline and post-intervention., Results: Of 21 patients enrolled; 19 completed pre- and post-surgery BBS. The mean age was 59.8±13.3 years with 14 females. There was a statistically significant improvement in all outcome scores and radiographic parameters after surgery; but no difference in BBS. Only one patient had a BBS score low enough to be considered a medium fall risk. There was no difference in the pre-op BBS scores in the four patients that had revision surgery compared to those that did not., Conclusions: In this small pilot study; BBS did not appear to be associated with measures of clinical and radiographic improvement in ASD patients. The test was also potentially problematic in that it has a ceiling effect and required significant time with a trained physical therapist for administration. Continued effort to identify a viable measure of balance dysfunction in ASD patients is warranted., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2019 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Posterior interbody fusion is commonly performed for degenerative lumbar conditions. A minimally invasive technique of midline exposure limited only to the facets and fixation with laterally directed cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws was introduced with the intent of decreasing surgical morbidity. The purpose of this study was to determine if posterior interbody fusion with this limited midline exposure will have less blood loss and shorter operative times (i.e., can be considered minimally invasive) compared to traditional open transforaminal interbody fusion., Methods: A consecutive single-surgeon series of patients who underwent posterior interbody fusion with either a navigated, midline only exposure (MidLIF) or full, traditional open, exposure of the transverse processes with a posterolateral fusion (open TLIF) were identified. Demographic, peri-operative data, patient reported outcomes (PROs), and reoperation/readmission rates were collected and compared., Results: There were 29 cases in the MidLIF and 27 in the open TLIF group. Both groups were similar with respect to surgical indications, age, BMI, gender, ASA grade and operative level. The MidLIF group had significantly lower estimated blood loss (266 vs. 446 cc, p = 0.003), shorter operative time (170 vs. 210 minutes, p = 0.003), and shorter length of hospital stay (2.9 vs. 3.7 days, p = 0.016) compared to the open TLIF group. A sub-analysis of single-level cases showed similar findings with significantly lower estimated blood loss (247 vs. 411 cc, p = 0.10), shorter operative time (159 vs. 199 min, p = 0.003), and shorter length of hospital stay (2.9 vs. 3.7 days, p = 0.023) in the MidLIF group. Patient reported outcomes at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months post-operative favored MidLIF with significantly greater ODI improvements at both 6 weeks and 12 months; and lower ODI and back pain at both 12 months and 24 months., Conclusions: MidLIF had lower blood loss and shorter operative time compared to the traditional open TLIF technique. These differences compare well to reported values in the literature for tubular minimally-invasive TLIF. Patient reported outcomes from 6 weeks to 24 months post-operative, hospital length of stay, and reoperation/readmission rates all favored MidLIF compared to traditional open TLIF.

Study Design: Secondary analysis of prospective multicenter cohort., Objective: To assess effect of serious adverse events (SAEs) on 2- and 4-year patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) in patients surgically treated for adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis (ASLS)., Summary of Background Data: Operative treatment for ASLS can improve health-related quality of life, but has high rates of SAEs. How these SAEs effect health-related quality of life remain unclear., Methods: The ASLS study assessed operative versus nonoperative ASLS treatment, with randomized and observational arms. Patients were 40- to 80-years-old with ASLS, defined as lumbar coronal Cobb ≥30° and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) ≥20 or Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) ≤4.0 in pain, function, and/or self-image domains. SRS-22 subscore and ODI were compared between operative patients with and without a related SAE and nonoperative patients using an as-treated analysis combining randomized and observational cohorts., Results: Two hundred eighty-six patients were enrolled, and 2- and 4-year follow-up rates were 90% and 81%, respectively, although at the time of data extraction not all patients were eligible for 4-year follow-up. A total of 97 SAEs were reported among 173 operatively treated patients. The most common were implant failure/pseudarthrosis (n = 25), proximal junctional kyphosis/failure (n = 10), and minor motor deficit (n = 8). At 2 years patients with an SAE improved less than those without an SAE based on SRS-22 (0.52 vs. 0.79, P = 0.004) and ODI (-11.59 vs. -17.34, P = 0.021). These differences were maintained at 4-years for both SRS-22 (0.51 vs. 0.86, P = 0.001) and ODI (-10.73 vs. -16.69, P = 0.012). Despite this effect, patients sustaining an operative SAE had greater PROM improvement than nonoperative patients (P<0.001)., Conclusion: Patients affected by SAEs following surgery for ASLS had significantly less improvement of PROMs at 2- and 4-year follow-ups versus those without an SAE. Regardless of SAE occurrence, operatively treated patients had significantly greater improvement in PROMs than those treated nonoperatively., Level of Evidence: 2.

Background: The effectiveness of operative compared with nonoperative treatment at initial presentation (no prior fusion) for adult lumbar scoliosis has not, to our knowledge, been evaluated in controlled trials. The goals of this study were to evaluate the effects of operative and nonoperative treatment and to assess the benefits of these treatments to help treating physicians determine whether patients are better managed operatively or nonoperatively., Methods: Patients with adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis (aged 40 to 80 years, with a coronal Cobb angle measurement of ≥30° and an Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] score of ≥20 or Scoliosis Research Society [SRS]-22 score of ≤4.0) from 9 North American centers were enrolled in concurrent randomized or observational cohorts to evaluate operative versus nonoperative treatment. The primary outcomes were differences in the mean change from baseline in the SRS-22 subscore and ODI at 2-year follow-up. For the randomized cohort, the initial sample-size calculation estimated that 41 patients per group (82 total) would provide 80% power with alpha equal to 0.05, anticipating 10% loss to follow-up and 20% nonadherence in the nonoperative arm. However, an interim sample-size calculation estimated that 18 patients per group would be sufficient., Results: Sixty-three patients were enrolled in the randomized cohort: 30 in the operative group and 33 in the nonoperative group. Two hundred and twenty-three patients were enrolled in the observational cohort: 112 in the operative group and 111 in the nonoperative group. The intention-to-treat analysis of the randomized cohort found that, at 2 years of follow-up, outcomes did not differ between the groups. Nonadherence was high in the randomized cohort (64% nonoperative-to-operative crossover). In the as-treated analysis of the randomized cohort, operative treatment was associated with greater improvement at the 2-year follow-up in the SRS-22 subscore (adjusted mean difference, 0.7 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.5 to 1.0]) and in the ODI (adjusted mean difference, -16 [95% CI, -22 to -10]) (p < 0.001 for both). Surgery was also superior to nonoperative care in the observational cohort at 2 years after treatment on the basis of SRS-22 subscore and ODI outcomes (p < 0.001). In an overall responder analysis, more operative patients achieved improvement meeting or exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the SRS-22 subscore (85.7% versus 38.7%; p < 0.001) and the ODI (77.4% versus 38.3%; p < 0.001). Thirty-four revision surgeries were performed in 24 (14%) of the operative patients., Conclusions: On the basis of as-treated and MCID analyses, if a patient with adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis is satisfied with current spine-related health, nonoperative treatment is advised, with the understanding that improvement is unlikely. If a patient is not satisfied with current spine health and expects improvement, surgery is preferred., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background Context: Previous studies suggest that a postoperative symptom state with Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)≤20 and pain Numeric Rating Scales (NRS)≤2 following surgery for lumbar degenerative conditions are reasonable thresholds for best outcomes in which patients will be unlikely to seek additional medical care or require additional health-care resources., Purpose: To identify prognostic factors that predict a "best outcome," defined as postoperative ODI≤20 and pain NRS≤2 following fusion for lumbar degenerative conditions., Study Design: Longitudinal observational cohort., Patient Sample: A total of 396 patients from a single site enrolled in the Quality Outcomes Database who underwent fusion for lumbar degenerative conditions., Outcome Measures: Oswestry Disability Index, Back and Leg Pain NRS (0-10)., Methods: Collected and analyzed variables included age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesia grade, number of surgical levels, surgical time, preoperative ODI, preoperative back pain, preoperative leg pain, workmen compensation status, surgical approach, smoking status, and principal diagnosis., Results: A total of 74 patients (19%) reported a minimal symptom state at 1-year postoperative (ODI≤20, back pain NRS≤2, and leg pain NRS≤2) and were included in the best outcomes group. Patients in the best outcomes group were older (62 vs. 57 years, p=.001), had lower preoperative ODI (43 vs. 56, p=.000), lower preoperative back pain (6.5 vs. 7.5, p=.000). They had fewer surgical levels (1.25 vs. 1.47, p=.005) and shorter operative times [OR] times (208 vs. 241 minutes, p=.002). They were more likely to have a preoperative diagnosis of spondylolisthesis or disc herniation and less likely to have a diagnosis of adjacent segment disease or mechanical disc collapse (p=.001). Stepwise forward regression analysis revealed diagnosis (p=.023, OR=0.75), age (p=.000, OR=1.04), baseline ODI (p=.000, OR=0.96), and number of levels (p=.019, OR=0.53) as predictive variables., Conclusion: Achieving a minimal symptom state, defined here as a postoperative ODI≤20 and pain NRS≤2, following fusion for lumbar degenerative conditions is more likely in an older patient with a lower baseline ODI undergoing a single level lumbar fusion for spondylolisthesis., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Longitudinal cohort., Objective: To report on the prevalence and indications for unplanned reoperations following index surgery in the Adult Symptomatic Lumbar Scoliosis NIH-sponsored Clinical Trial., Summary of Background Data: Reoperation following adult spinal deformity surgery exposes the patient to additional surgical risk, increases the cost of care, and decreases the potential cost-effectiveness of the intervention. Accurate data regarding the prevalence and indication for reoperation will facilitate future efforts to minimize risk., Methods: A total of 153 patients underwent adult spinal deformity surgery as part of the observational, randomized, or crossover groups and were eligible for two-year follow-up. Reoperations were meticulously tracked as part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-mandated serious adverse event (SAE) reporting. The primary indication for reoperation was obtained from the treating surgeon's operative report., Results: Thirty-two patients had one reoperation, two patients underwent two reoperations, and three patients underwent three reoperations. A total of 45 reoperations were performed in 37 patients. Eleven patients (7%) underwent reoperation within 90 days of the index surgery: two for superficial wound dehiscence, three for radiculopathy with screw removal, and six for acute proximal junctional failure (PJF). Four patients underwent reoperation for PJF more than 90 days from index surgery. Twenty-six patients underwent 28 reoperations for rod fracture/pseudoarthrosis., Conclusion: In a consecutive series of adult spinal deformity surgery patients with meticulous follow-up, 24% of patients required an unplanned reoperation. The most common indication for reoperation was rod fracture/pseudoarthrosis, which occurred from 9 months to 3.7 years following the index surgery and accounted for 62% (28/45) of the reoperations. The second most common indication for reoperation was PJF, which occurred from 1 month to 1.6 years following index surgery and accounted for 22% (10/45) of the reoperations. As these complications will likely increase with longer follow-up, efforts to lower the rates of these complications are warranted., Level of Evidence: Level II., (Copyright © 2018 Scoliosis Research Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background Context: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and dual-approach anteroposterior (AP) are common techniques to achieve circumferential fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis. It is unclear which approach is more cost-effective., Purpose: Our goal was to determine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) by calculating the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) for each approach., Study Design/setting: This study is a propensity-matched cost-effectiveness comparison., Patient Sample: Patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis undergoing single-level AP fusion or TLIF and enrolled in a prospective observational surgical database were included in this study., Outcome Measures: The outcome measures in this study were the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Short Form-6D (SF-6D)., Methods: From a prospective surgical database, patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis undergoing single-level AP fusion were propensity matched to a TLIF cohort based on age, gender, body mass index, smoking status, workers compensation, preoperative ODI, and back and leg pain numeric scores. Quality-adjusted life years gained were determined using baseline and 1- and 2-yearpostoperative SF-6D scores. Cost was calculated from actual, direct hospital costs and included subsequent postsurgical costs (epidural spinal injections, spine-related emergency department visits, readmissions, and revision surgery)., Results: Thirty-one cases of AP fusions were identified and propensity matched to 31 TLIF patients. Patients undergoing TLIF had a shorter mean operative time (270 vs. 328 minutes, p=.039) but no difference in estimated blood loss (526 vs. 548 cc, p=.804) or hospital length of stay (4.5 vs. 6.1 days, p=.146). Quality-adjusted life years gained at 2 years were also similar (0.140 vs. 0.130, p=.672). The mean index surgery and the total 2-year costs were lower for TLIF compared with AP (index: $29,428 vs. $31,466; final: $30,684 vs. $331,880). As overall costs were lower and QALYs gained were similar for TLIF compared with AP fusion, TLIF was the dominant intervention with an ICER of $116,327., Conclusions: Under our study parameters, surgical treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis with TLIF is more cost-effective compared with AP fusion. Because of the short-term follow-up, the longevity of this should be further investigated., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Structured literature review., Objectives: The Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) requested an assessment of the current state of peer-reviewed evidence regarding pediatric lumbar spondylolisthesis with the goal of identifying what is known and what gaps remain in further understanding the diagnostic methods for pediatric spondylolisthesis., Summary of Background Data: Spondylolisthesis in the lumbar spine is common among children and adolescents and no formal synthesis of the published literature regarding diagnostic methods has been previously performed., Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed. Abstracts were reviewed and data from included studies were analyzed by the committee. From 6600 initial citations with abstract, 663 articles underwent full-text review. The best available evidence for the clinical questions regarding diagnostic methods was provided by 26 included studies. Six of the studies were graded as Level III (retrospective comparative), and represent the current best available evidence whereas 20 of the studies were graded as Level IV (retrospective case series) evidence. No Level V (expert opinion) studies were included in the final list. None of the studies were graded as Level I or Level II., Results: Plain radiography is the workhorse imaging modality for diagnosing spondylolisthesis. No association between radiologic grade of spondylolisthesis and clinical presentation were noted; however, grade III and IV slips more often required surgery, and increasing slip angles were associated with worse baseline outcome scores. There is Level III evidence that the Meyerding grade appears to be more accurate for measuring slip percentage whereas the Lonstein Slip angle and Dubousset Lumbosacral Kyphosis angles are the best for measuring lumbosacral kyphosis in spondylolisthesis. In addition, higher sacral table index, pelvic incidence, sacral slope, and lower sacral table angle were associated with spondylolisthesis. True incidence could not be determined by the current literature available. However, studies in adolescent athletes demonstrated an incidence of 6% to 7% across studies., Conclusions: The current "best available" evidence to guide the diagnosis and characterization of pediatric spondylolisthesis is presented. Future studies are needed to provide more high-quality evidence to answer these clinically relevant questions., Level of Evidence: Level III, review of Level III studies., (Copyright © 2017 Scoliosis Research Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Up to 10% of free-hand pedicle screws are malpositioned, and 1 in 300 patients may undergo return to surgery for revision of malpositioned screws. The indications for revision of asymptomatic malpositioned screws have not been carefully examined in the literature. We sought to evaluate the threshold among spinal deformity surgeons for revision of malpositioned screws., Methods: Twelve experienced spine surgeons reviewed x-ray and computed tomographic images of 32 malpositioned pedicle screws with variable degrees of anterior, medial, and lateral breeches. The surgeons were asked whether based on the image they would revise the screw: (1) intraoperatively before rod placement; (2) intraoperatively after rod placement; (3) in clinic with an asymptomatic patient. For each scenario, we assumed stable neuromonitoring and no neurological changes. Agreement and multirater κ was calculated., Results: There was good agreement as to which screws were malpositioned (80% agreement, κ=0.703). After the rod was placed or postoperatively (scenarios 2 and 3), surgeons less frequently recommended screw revision, and there was greater variability among the surgeons' recommendations. For return to surgery from clinic for asymptomatic screw revision, % agreement was only 65% (κ=0.477). The majority recommended revision surgery for screws which approached the dura (10/12) or the aorta (7/12 surgeons). Half of the surgeons recommended revision surgery for an asymptomatic screw if the entire screw diameter was in the canal. Revision surgery was not recommended for asymptomatic patients with screws partially violating the canal (<½ the screw diameter), malpositioned laterally in the rib head, or with small anterior cortical violations remote from a vascular structure., Conclusions: There is significant variability of opinion among surgeons regarding which malpositioned screws can be safely observed in an asymptomatic patient. Given the frequency of malpositioned screws and morbidity of surgical return to surgery, more long-term data are needed to develop practice guidelines for determining which screws require revision surgery., Level of Evidence: Level III-retrospective comparative study.

Study Design: Longitudinal cohort., Objective: To investigate whether patients with painful adolescent idiopathic scoliosis experience pain relief with surgical treatment., Summary of Background Data: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) was previously thought to be a painless condition, but recent studies have shown that a significant proportion of patients have pain. Little information is available regarding pain relief with surgical treatment for AIS., Methods: Patients enrolled in a prospective database of surgically treated AIS were divided into two groups based on their preoperative Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22R pain domain score. Patients with a preoperative pain domain score of 4 or more (N = 1005) were classified as nonpainful. If the preoperative pain domain score was less than 4 (N = 505), they were classified as painful. Demographics, SRS total and domain scores, and changes with treatment were compared for the two groups., Results: The two groups had similar demographics and preoperative coronal curve magnitude. Patients with painful scoliosis experienced significant improvement in SRS-22R pain scores, from 3.29 preoperatively to 4.03 postoperatively (P < 0.000). Eighty-one percent of these patients reached the minimum clinically important difference threshold (0.20) for improvement in pain score. Painful scoliosis patients also had greater 2-year improvement in total and all domain scores than the nonpainful scoliosis patients (P < 0.000). Absolute values of SRS-22R total and domain scores were all greater at 2 years in the nonpainful group than the painful group., Conclusion: Patients with AIS with substantial back pain can be cautiously counseled to expect significant improvement in pain level with surgical correction of their deformity, even if curve progression is the primary indication for surgery. Although these patients achieve greater improvements in health-related quality of life compared with patients with mild or no pain, 2-year SRS-22R scores were still better in patients with mild or no pain preoperatively., Level of Evidence: 2.

Study Design: Longitudinal cohort., Objectives: To determine if the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) thresholds for the Scoliosis Research Society-22R (SRS22R) domains in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis are similar to those in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) with fusions extending into the thoracic spine., Summary of Background Data: The MCID and SCB thresholds for the SRS22R domains in patients with ASD and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis have been reported., Methods: Patients enrolled in the NIH-sponsored Adult Symptomatic Lumbar Scoliosis (ASLS) trial who underwent surgery and completed the SRS22R preoperative and the SRS30 one-year postoperative were identified. One-year postoperative answers to the last eight questions of the SRS30 were used as anchors to determine the MCID and SCB for the Pain, Appearance, and Activity domains, and the Subscore and Total score using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis., Results: The sample population consisted of 147 patients. A total of 132 (89%) were females with a mean age of 59.4 years. There was a statistically significant improvement in all SRS22R scores from preoperative to one-year postoperative. There was also a statistically significant difference in domain scores among the different responses to the anchors. According to the ROC analysis, MCID was 1.17 for Appearance, 0.40 for Activity, 0.60 for Pain, 0.53 for Subscore, and 0.77 for Total; and SCB was 1.67 for Appearance, 0.60 for Activity, 0.62 for Subscore, and 1.11 for Total score. These are similar to previous reports of MCID and SCB thresholds for ASD patients who underwent fusion to the thoracic spine., Conclusion: The MCID and SCB thresholds for the SRS22R domains in patients with adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis are very similar to the threshold values previously reported for adult deformity patients., Level of Evidence: Level II., (Copyright © 2017 Scoliosis Research Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Structured literature review., Objectives: The Scoliosis Research Society requested an assessment of the current state of peer-reviewed evidence regarding pediatric lumbar spondylolisthesis to identify what is known and what research remains essential to further understanding., Summary of Background Data: Pediatric lumbar spondylolisthesis is common, yet no formal synthesis of the published literature regarding treatment has been previously performed., Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed. From 6600 initial citations with abstract, 663 articles underwent full-text review. The best available evidence regarding surgical and medical/interventional treatment was provided by 51 studies. None of the studies were graded Level I or II evidence. Eighteen of the studies were Level III, representing the current best available evidence. Thirty-three of the studies were Level IV., Results: Although studies suggest a benign course for "low grade" (<50% slip) isthmic spondylolisthesis, extensive literature suggests that a substantial number of patients present for treatment with pain and activity limitations. Pain resolution and return to activity is common with both medical/interventional and operative treatment. The role of medical/interventional bracing is not well established. Uninstrumented posterolateral fusion has been reported to produce good clinical results, but concerns regarding nonunion exist. Risk of slip progression is a specific concern in the "high grade" or dysplastic type. Although medical/interventional observation has been reported to be reasonable in a small series of asymptomatic high-grade slip patients, surgical treatment is commonly recommended to prevent progression. There is Level III evidence that instrumentation and reduction lowers the risk of nonunion, and that circumferential fusion is superior to posterior-only or anterior-only fusion. There is Level III evidence that patients with a higher slip angle are more likely to fail medical/interventional treatment of high-grade spondylolisthesis., Conclusions: The current "best available" evidence to guide the treatment of pediatric spondylolisthesis is presented., Level of Evidence: Level III; review of Level III studies., (Copyright © 2017 Scoliosis Research Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

OBJECTIVE Patient satisfaction is a commonly used metric in the current health care environment. While factors that affect patient satisfaction following spine surgery are complex, the authors of this study hypothesized that specific diagnostic groups of patients are more likely to be satisfied after spine surgery and that this is reflected in patient-reported outcome measures. The purpose of this study was to determine if the preoperative diagnosis-disc herniation, stenosis, spondylolisthesis, adjacent segment degeneration, or mechanical disc collapse-would impact patient satisfaction following surgery. METHODS Patients enrolled in the Quality Outcomes Database, formerly known as the National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N 2 QOD), completed patient-reported outcome measures, including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for back pain (NRS-BP) and leg pain (NRS-LP) preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. Patients were stratified by diagnosis and by their response to the satisfaction question: 1) surgery met my expectations; 2) I did not improve as much as I hoped, but I would undergo the same operation for the same results; 3) surgery helped, but I would not undergo the same operation for the same results; or 4) I am the same or worse as compared with before surgery. RESULTS A greater proportion of patients with primary disc herniation or spondylolisthesis reported that surgery met expectations (66% and 67%, respectively), followed by recurrent disc herniation and stenosis (59% and 60%, respectively). A smaller proportion of patients who underwent surgery for adjacent segment degeneration or mechanical disc collapse had their expectations met (48% and 41%, respectively). The percentage of patients that would undergo the same surgery again, by diagnostic group, was as follows: disc herniation 88%, recurrent disc herniation 79%, spondylolisthesis 86%, stenosis 82%, adjacent segment disease 75%, and mechanical collapse 73%. Regardless of diagnosis, mean improvement and ultimate 1-year postoperative ODI, NRS-BP, and NRS-LP reflected patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative diagnosis was predictive of patient satisfaction following spine surgery. The mean change in and 1-year ODI, NRS-BP, and NRS-LP reflected patient satisfaction regardless of preoperative diagnosis.

Background: Spondylolysis is common among the pediatric population, yet no formal systematic literature review regarding diagnostic imaging has been performed. The Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) requested an assessment of the current state of peer reviewed evidence regarding pediatric spondylolysis., Methods: Literature was searched professionally and citations retrieved. Abstracts were reviewed and analyzed by the SRS Evidence-Based Medicine Committee. Level I studies were considered to provide Good Evidence for the clinical question. Level II or III studies were considered Fair Evidence. Level IV studies were considered Poor Evidence. From 947 abstracts, 383 full texts reviewed. Best available evidence for the questions of diagnostic methods was provided by 27 studies: no Level I sensitivity/specificity studies, five Level II and two Level III evidence, and 19 Level IV evidence., Results: Pain with hyperextension in athletes is the most widely reported finding in history and physical examination. Plain radiography is considered a first-line diagnostic test for suspected spondylolysis, but validation evidence is lacking. There is consistent Level II and III evidence that pars defects are detected by advanced imaging in 32% to 44% of adolescents with spondylolysis based on history and physical. Level III evidence that single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is superior to planar bone scan and plain radiographs but limited by high rates of false-positive and false-negative results and by high radiation dose. Computed tomography (CT) is considered the gold standard and most accurate modality for detecting the bony defect and assessment of osseous healing but exposes the pediatric patient to ionizing radiation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is reported to be as accurate as CT and useful in detecting early stress reactions of the pars without a fracture., Conclusion: Plain radiographs are widely used as screening tools for pediatric spondylolysis. CT scan is considered the gold standard but exposes the patient to a significant amount of ionizing radiation. Evidence is fair and promising that MRI is comparable to CT., (Copyright © 2016 Scoliosis Research Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Advancements in the understanding of adult spinal deformity have led to a greater awareness of the role of the pelvis in maintaining sagittal balance and alignment. Pelvic incidence has emerged as a key radiographic measure and should closely match lumbar lordosis. As proper measurement of the pelvic incidence requires accurate identification of the S-1 endplate, lumbosacral transitional anatomy may lead to errors. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate how lumbosacral transitional anatomy may lead to errors in the measurement of pelvic parameters. The current case highlights one of the potential complications that can be avoided with awareness. The authors report the case of a 61-year-old man who had undergone prior lumbar surgeries and then presented with symptomatic lumbar stenosis and sagittal malalignment. Radiographs showed a lumbarized S-1. Prior numbering of the segments in previous surgical and radiology reports led to a pelvic incidence calculation of 61°. Corrected numbering of the segments using the lumbarized S-1 endplate led to a pelvic incidence calculation of 48°. Without recognition of the lumbosacral anatomy, overcorrection of the lumbar lordosis might have led to negative sagittal balance and the propensity to develop proximal junction failure. This case illustrates that improper identification of lumbosacral transitional anatomy may lead to errors that could affect clinical outcome. Awareness of this potential error may help improve patient outcomes.

Background Context: The North American Spine Society's (NASS) Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Adult Isthmic Spondylolisthesis features evidence-based recommendations for diagnosing and treating adult patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis. The guideline is intended to reflect contemporary treatment concepts for symptomatic isthmic spondylolisthesis as reflected in the highest quality clinical literature available on this subject as of June 2013. NASS' guideline on this topic is the only guideline on adult isthmic spondylolisthesis accepted in the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's National Guideline Clearinghouse., Purpose: The purpose of the guideline is to provide an evidence-based educational tool to assist spine specialists when making clinical decisions for adult patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis. This article provides a brief summary of the evidence-based guideline recommendations for diagnosing and treating patients with this condition., Study Design: This is a guideline summary review., Methods: This guideline is the product of the Adult Isthmic Spondylolisthesis Work Group of NASS' Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline Development Committee. The methods used to develop this guideline are detailed in the complete guideline and technical report available on the NASS website. In brief, a multidisciplinary work group of spine care specialists convened to identify clinical questionsto address in the guideline. The literature search strategy was developed in consultation with medical librarians. Upon completion of the systematic literature search, evidence relevant to the clinical questions posed in the guideline was reviewed. Work group members utilized NASS evidentiary table templates to summarize study conclusions, identify study strengths and weaknesses, and assign levels of evidence. Work group members participated in webcasts and in-person recommendation meetings to update and formulate evidence-based recommendations and incorporate expert opinion when necessary. The draft guidelines were submitted to an internal peer review process and ultimately approved by the NASS Board of Directors. Upon publication, the Adult Isthmic Spondylolisthesis guideline was accepted into the National Guideline Clearinghouse and will be updated approximately every 5 years., Results: Thirty-one clinical questions were addressed, and the answers are summarized in this article. The respective recommendations were graded according to the levels of evidence of the supporting literature., Conclusions: The evidence-based clinical guideline has been created using techniques of evidence-based medicine and best available evidence to aid practitioners in the diagnosis and treatment of adult patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis. The entire guideline document, including the evidentiary tables, literature search parameters, literature attrition flowchart, suggestions for future research, and all of the references, is available electronically on the NASS website at https://www.spine.org/ResearchClinicalCare/QualityImprovement/ClinicalGuidelines.aspx and will remain updated on a timely schedule., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design  Retrospective comparative cohort. Objective  Pseudarthrosis following fusion for degenerative lumbar spine pathologies remains a substantial problem. Current data shows that patients who develop a pseudarthrosis have suboptimal outcomes. This study evaluates if treatment of pseudarthrosis can be affected by surgical approach. Methods  Medical records of 63 female and 65 male patients (mean age 50.37) who were treated for nonunion following lumbar fusion were reviewed. Sixty patients underwent posterolateral fusion (PSF), 18 underwent PSF with transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF), 32 underwent anterior and posterior spinal fusion (AP), and 24 underwent anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). Results  Significant differences between the treatment groups were observed in length of stay ( p  = 0.000), blood loss ( p  = 0.000), and operative time ( p  = 0.000). In the AP fusion group, minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was reached in 47% of patients for back pain, 28% for leg pain, and 28% for Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). PSF had the highest percentage of patients reaching MCID for Short Form-36 (SF-36) physical composite score at 25%. ALIF and TLIF subgroups reached MCID for ODI in 17% of patients. Linear regression analysis showed that type of surgical approach did not impact change in ODI scores. Conclusion  Although not statistically significant, the AP fusion group reached MCID more frequently in all outcomes except SF-36 Physical Component Summary. All surgical approaches examined for treatment of lumbar pseudarthrosis resulted in only poor to modest improvement in ODI. This result further emphasizes the importance of achieving a solid fusion with the index surgery.

Study Design: Prospective, cross-sectional study., Objective: The aim of the study was to determine which radiographic parameters drive patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in primary presentation adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis (ASLS)., Summary of Background Data: Previous literature suggests correlations between PROs and sagittal plane deformity (sagittal vertical axis [SVA], pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis [PI-LL] mismatch, pelvic tilt [PT]). Prior work included revision and primary adult spinal deformity patients. The present study addresses only primary presentation ASLS., Methods: Prospective baseline data were analyzed on 286 patients enrolled in an NIH RO1 clinical trial by nine centers from 2010 to 2014., Inclusion Criteria: 40 to 80 years old, lumbar Cobb (LC) 30° or higher and Scoliosis Research Society-23 score 4.0 or less in Pain, Function or Self-Image domains, or Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) 20 or higher. Patients were primary presentation (no prior spinal deformity surgery) and had complete baseline data: standing coronal/sagittal 36" radiographs and PROs (ODI, Scoliosis Research Society-23, Short Form-12). Correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate relations between radiographic parameters and PROs for the study population and a subset of patients with ODI 40 or higher. Analysis of variance was used to identify differences in PROs for radiographic modifier groups., Results: Mean age was 60.3 years. Mean spinopelvic parameters were: LL = -39.2°; SVA = 3.1 cm; sacral slope = 32.5°; PT = 23.9°; PI-LL mismatch = 16.8°. Only weak correlations (0.2-0.4) were identified between population sacral slope, SVA and SVA modifiers, and SRS function. SVA and SVA modifiers were weakly associated with ODI. Although there were more correlations in subset analysis of high-symptom patients, all were weak. Analysis of variance identified significant differences in ODI reported by SVA modifier groups., Conclusion: In primary presentation patients with ASLS and a subset of "high-symptom" patients (ODI ≥ 40), only weak associations between baseline PROs and radiographic parameters were identified. For this patient population, these results suggest regional radiographic parameters (LC, LL, PT, PI-LL mismatch) are not drivers of PROs and cannot be used to extrapolate effect on patient-perceived pathology., Level of Evidence: 2.

OBJECTIVE The relief of leg symptoms by surgical decompression for lumbar stenosis is well supported by the literature. Less is known about the effect on back pain. Some surgeons believe that the relief of back pain should not be an expected outcome of decompression and that substantial back pain may be a contraindication to decompression only; therefore, stabilization may be recommended for patients with substantial preoperative back pain even in the absence of well-accepted indications for stabilization such as spondylolisthesis, scoliosis, or sagittal malalignment. The purpose of this study is to determine if patients with lumbar stenosis and substantial back pain-in the absence of spondylolisthesis, scoliosis, or sagittal malalignment-can obtain significant improvement after decompression without fusion or stabilization. METHODS Analysis of the National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N 2 QOD) identified 726 patients with lumbar stenosis (without spondylolisthesis or scoliosis) and a baseline back pain score ≥ 5 of 10 who underwent surgical decompression only. No patient was reported to have significant spondylolisthesis, scoliosis, or sagittal malalignment. Standard demographic and surgical variables were collected, as well as patient outcomes including back and leg pain scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and EuroQoL 5D (EQ-5D) at baseline and 3 and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS The mean age of the cohort was 65.6 years, and 407 (56%) patients were male. The mean body mass index was 30.2 kg/m 2 , and 40% of patients had 2-level decompression, 29% had 3-level decompression, 24% had 1-level decompression, and 6% had 4-level decompression. The mean estimated blood loss was 130 ml. The mean operative time was 100.85 minutes. The vast majority of discharges (88%) were routine home discharges. At 3 and 12 months postoperatively, there were significant improvements from baseline for back pain (7.62 to 3.19 to 3.66), leg pain (7.23 to 2.85 to 3.07), EQ-5D (0.55 to 0.76 to 0.75), and ODI (49.11 to 27.20 to 26.38). CONCLUSIONS Through the 1st postoperative year, patients with lumbar stenosis-without spondylolisthesis, scoliosis, or sagittal malalignment-and clinically significant back pain improved after decompression-only surgery.

Study Design: Longitudinal cohort., Objectives: To determine Substantial Clinical Benefit (SCB) thresholds for the SRS22R domains in patients undergoing adult spinal deformity surgery., Summary of Background Data: The Scoliosis Research Society 22R (SRS22R) has been shown to be reliable, valid, and responsive to change in adult spinal deformity patients. Although the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is commonly used to quantify a threshold of improvement, it could be considered a floor value rather than a goal., Methods: Patients enrolled in a prospective database of adult spinal deformity undergoing surgery with complete SRS22R preoperation and the SRS30 one-year after surgery were identified. One-year postoperative answers to the last 8 questions of the SRS30 were used as anchors to determine the SCB for the Appearance and Activity domains, Subtotal and Total Score using ROC Curve analysis., Results: The sample population consisted of 1,422 patients; 83% were females. Mean age was 53 ± 16 years. Mean preoperative SRS22R Appearance score was 2.50 ± 0.73 improving to 3.62 ± 0.84 at one year postoperative. Mean preoperative SRS22R Activity score was 2.96 ± 0.59 improving to 3.33 ± 0.80 at one year postoperative. Mean preoperative SRS22R Pain score was 2.73 ± 0.92 improving to 3.60 ± 0.93 at one year postoperative. Mean preoperative SRS22R Subtotal was 2.56 ± 0.66 improving to 3.11 ± 0.80 at one year postoperative. There was a statistically significant difference in domain scores among the responses to the anchors (p < .001). Based on ROC analysis, SCB was 1.60 for Appearance, 0.87 for Activity, 0.69 for Subtotal, and 0.94 for Total score., Conclusion: The results of the current study in an adult spinal deformity population undergoing surgical treatment show SRS22R SCB values of 1.60 for Appearance, 0.87 for Activity, 0.69 for Subtotal, and 0.94 for Total score. These SCB thresholds can be used to quantify the clinical significance of health status change in the surgical management of adult spinal deformity., Level of Evidence: Level II., (Copyright © 2016 Scoliosis Research Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

OBJECTIVE Studies have shown that anxious or depressed patients may have poorer outcomes after lumbar fusion. These conclusions were drawn from questionnaires specifically designed to measure anxiety and depression. The objective of this study is to determine if responses to the EQ-5D anxiety/depression domain or the items used to calculate the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Mental Component Summary (MCS) can predict outcomes after lumbar fusion surgery. METHODS Patients enrolled in the National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database from a single center with 1-year follow-up were identified. The outcomes collected include the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EQ-5D, SF-36, and the back- and leg-pain numeric rating scales (range 0-10). Linear regression modeling was performed to predict the 1-year ODI scores using the EQ-5D anxiety/depression domain and the 14 items used to calculate SF-36 MCS. RESULTS Complete data were available for 312 (88%) of 353 eligible patients. The mean patient age was 58.5 years, 175 (56%) patients were women, and 52 patients were smokers. After controlling for other factors, the item in the SF-36 that asks "Have you felt downhearted and depressed?" is the strongest predictor of the 1-year ODI score (r(2) = 0.191; p = 0.000) and 1-year EQ-5D score (r(2) = 0.205; p = 0.000). Neither the EQ-5D anxiety/depression domain nor the diagnoses of anxiety or depression were predictors of 1-year outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Patient responses to SF-36 item "Have you felt downhearted and depressed?" account for 20% of the variability of the 1-year ODI and EQ-5D scores and can be used by clinicians to screen for anxiety or depression in patients prior to lumbar fusion surgery. Clinicians may offer psychological support to these patients preoperatively in order to improve treatment outcomes.

Background: Caring for pediatric spine trauma patients places spine surgeons in situations that require unique solutions for complex problems. Recent case reports have highlighted a specific injury pattern to the lower cervical spine in very young children that is frequently associated with complete spinal cord injury., Methods: This report describes the presentation and treatment of a C6-C7 dislocation in a 3-year-old patient with an incomplete spinal cord injury. The highly unstable cervical injury and the need to prevent neurologic decline added complexity to the case., Results: A multi-surgeon team allowed for ample manpower to position the patient; with individuals with the requisite training and experience to safely move a patient with a highly unstable cervical spine. Initial closed reduction under close neurophysiologic monitoring, posterior fusion and immediate anterior stabilization lead to a successful patient outcome with preserved neurologic function. A traumatic cerebrospinal fluid leak, while a concern early on during the procedure, resolved without direct dural repair and did not complicate the patient's fusion healing. Additional anterior stabilization and fusion allowed long-term stability with bone healing that may not be achievable with posterior fixation and/or soft tissue healing alone., Conclusions: Familiarity with the challenges and solutions presented in the case may be useful to surgeons who could face a similar challenge in the future.

Study Design: A prospective study with randomized and observational cohorts., Objective: The aim of this study was to determine baseline variables affecting adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis (ASLS) decision making to participate in randomization (RAND), observational nonsurgical (OBS-NS), or observational surgical (OBS-S) cohorts., Summary of Background Data: Multiple factors play a key role in a patient's decision to be randomized or to choose an OBS-NS or OBS-S course for ASLS. Studies evaluating these factors are limited., Methods: Eligible candidates (patients with ASLS and no prior spinal fusion deformity surgery) from 9 centers participated in a RAND, OBS-NS, or OBS-S cohort study. Baseline variables (demographics, socioeconomics, patient-reported outcomes [PROs], Functional Treadmill Test, radiographs) were analyzed., Results: Two hundred ninety-five patients were enrolled: 67 RAND, 115 OBS-NS, 113 OBS-S. Subanalysis of older patients (60-80 years) found 54% of OBS-NS had college degrees compared with 82% of RAND and 71% of OBS-S (P = 0.010). Patients deciding to be part of a RAND cohort have similar clinical characteristics to the OBS-S cohort. OBS-S had more symptomatic spinal stenosis (57% vs. 39%, P = 0.029) and worse scores than OBS-NS on the basis of PROs (Back Pain Numerical Rating Scale [NRS 6.3 vs. 5.5, P = 0.007]; Scoliosis Research Society [SRS] Pain [2.8 vs. 3.0, P = 0.018], Function [3.1 vs. 3.4, P = 0.019] and Self-Image [2.7 vs. 3.1, P = 0.002]; Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) [36.9 vs. 31.8, P = 0.029]; post-Treadmill back [5.8 vs. 4.4, P = 0.002] and leg [4.3 vs. 3.1, P = 0.037] pain NRS and larger lumbar coronal Cobb angles (56.5 degrees vs. 48.8 degrees, P < 0.001). RAND had more baseline motor deficits (10.4% vs. 1.7%, P = 0.036) and worse scores than OBS-NS on the basis of ODI (38.8 vs. 31.8, P = 0.006), SRS Function [3.1 vs. 3.4, P = 0.034], and Self-Image [2.7 vs. 3.1, P = 0.007]., Conclusion: Patients with worse PROs, more back pain, more back and leg pain with ambulation, and larger lumbar Cobb angles are more inclined to select surgical over nonsurgical management.

Diagnosis is crucial in early-stage lumbar spondylolysis, as osseous healing can occur with conservative treatment. Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) traditionally has been the most sensitive modality for diagnosing active (early) spondylolysis. More recently, high signal change (HSC) in the pedicle or pars interarticularis on fluid-specific (T2) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown to be important in the diagnosis of early spondylolysis. We conducted a study to determine the clinical and radiographic characteristics associated with the diagnosis of early or active spondylolysis. Fifty-seven patients with a total of 108 pars defects and a mean age of 14.6 years were retrospectively identified. Defects with a positive SPECT or HSC on T2 MRI were classified as active. There were 49 active and 59 inactive defects. The active and inactive groups did not differ in age, body mass index, symptom duration, lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence, slip percentage, or laterality. There was a difference in sex (35 vs 19 males; P < .0001) and presence of listhesis (16 vs 35; P = .006). Active or early juvenile spondylolysis appears to be associated with male patients and the absence of listhesis, which may be important in identifying patients with a higher potential to experience osseous healing with nonoperative treatment.

Study Design: Longitudinal cohort., Objective: To establish minimum clinically important difference (MCID) threshold values for Scoliosis Research Society-22R (SRS-22R) domains in patients with adult spinal deformity undergoing surgical correction., Summary of Background Data: The SRS-22R has been shown to be reliable, valid and responsive to change in patients with adult spinal deformity undergoing surgery. The MCID quantifies a threshold of improvement that is clinically relevant to the patient., Methods: Patients in a prospective database who completed the SRS-22R preoperatively and the SRS-30 1 year postoperatively were identified. Answers to the last 8 questions of the SRS-30 were used as anchors to determine MCID for the pain, appearance and activity domains, subscore, and total score using receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis. Calculations of MCID using distribution-based methods were also done., Results: A total of 1321 patients were included in the analysis; 83% were females and 10% were smokers. Mean age was 53 years. Mean body mass index was 26.3 kg/m. Mean preoperative SRS-22R appearance score was 2.50 improving to 3.62 at 1 year postoperatively (P < 0.001). Mean preoperative SRS-22R activity score was 2.96 and it improved to 3.33 at 1 year postoperatively (P < 0.001). Mean preoperative SRS-22R pain score was 2.73 improving to 3.60 at 1 year postoperatively (P < 0.001). Mean preoperative total score was 2.93 and it improved to 3.65 at 1 year postoperatively (P < 0.001). There was a statistically significant difference in domain scores among the responses to the anchors (P < 0.001). The different calculation methods yielded MCID values of 0.19 to 1.23 for appearance, 0.23 to 0.60 for activity, 0.24 to 0.57 for pain, 0.16 to 0.43 for subscore, and 0.17 to 0.71 for total score., Conclusion: When combined with previous reports, the results of this study in a population with adult spinal deformity undergoing surgical treatment show MCID for SRS-22 scores can be estimated as 0.4. This corresponds to a change of 1 interval in 2 of the 5 questions for a single domain., Level of Evidence: 2.

The goal of surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is to prevent disability associated with curve progression. Few investigators have considered whether the function of patients with AIS becomes adversely affected by major spine fusion surgery. Tertiary referral center patients (age, 10-17 years) who underwent spinal deformity correction a minimum of 5 years earlier were identified. Scoliosis Research Society-22R (SRS-22R) and Short Form-12 (SF-12) were administered. Data were available for 118 patients. Mean age was 14.1 years at surgery and 26.8 years at follow-up. Mean outcome scores were 50.9 (SF-12 physical composite summary), 49.4 (SF-12 mental composite summary), and 4.0 (SRS-22R total). One hundred patients (85%) were working. Common symptoms included occasional back pain (90, 76%), limited range of motion (52, 44%), activity limitations (54, 46%), waistline imbalance (41, 35%), rib prominence (28, 24%), wound/scar problems (18, 15%), and shortness of breath (18, 15%). Prominent implants were reported by 11 patients (9%). Seven of 14 reoperations were for instrumentation removal. There was a high incidence of occasional back pain and activity complaints after surgery for AIS in our cohort. However, normal SF-12 scores suggested that these symptoms did not lower the patients' general health.

Study Design: Structured literature review., Objectives: The Scoliosis Research Society requested an assessment of the current state of peer-reviewed evidence regarding pediatric spondylolysis with the goal of identifying both what is really known and what research remains essential to further understanding., Summary of Background Data: Spondylolysis is common among children and adolescents and no formal synthesis of the published literature regarding treatment has been previously performed., Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed. The researchers reviewed abstracts and analyzed by committee data from included studies. From 947 initial citations with abstract, 383 articles underwent full text review. The best available evidence for clinical questions regarding surgical and nonsurgical treatment was provided by 58 included studies. None of the studies were graded as level I or level II evidence. Two of the studies were graded as level III evidence. Fifty-six of the studies were graded as level IV evidence. No level V (expert opinion) studies were included in the final list., Results: Although natural history studies suggest a benign, relatively asymptomatic course for spondylolysis in most patients, both nonsurgical and surgical treatment series suggest that a substantial number of patients present with pain and activity limitations attributed to spondylolysis. Pain resolution and return to activity are common with both nonsurgical and surgical treatment (80% to 85%, respectively). Although it is implied that most surgically treated patients have failed nonsurgical treatment, the specific treatment modalities and duration required before failure is declared are not well defined. There is insufficient evidence to know which patients will benefit from specific treatment modalities (both nonsurgical and surgical)., Conclusions: Because of the preponderance of uncontrolled case series and the lack of comparative studies, only low-quality evidence is available to guide the treatment of pediatric spondylolysis., (Copyright © 2015 Scoliosis Research Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Structured literature review., Objectives: To assess the current state of evidence as a first step in the development of practice guidelines for pediatric spondylolysis., Summary of Background Data: Progress in published medical knowledge, changes in societal expectations, and developments in health care economics have led medical organizations to develop evidence-based documents and products., Methods: A comprehensive literature search for pediatric spondylolysis was performed with the assistance of a medical librarian. The authors reviewed citations and abstracts. Abstracts were reviewed for exclusions and data from included studies were analyzed by committee. A total of 44 articles provided the best available evidence for the questions of etiology, prevalence, natural history, and prognosis: 9 were graded as level I evidence, 23 were level II, 3 were level III, and 9 were level IV. No level V studies were included in the final list., Results: There is good evidence that pediatric lumbar spondylolysis is an acquired fracture of the pars interarticularis that can occur unilaterally or bilaterally. Evidence shows that when chronic, bilateral pars defects develop, 43% to 74% of patients will progress to grade 1 or 2 spondylolisthesis. In addition, unilateral, incomplete, and early lesions can obtain bony union. With or without bony union or spondylolisthesis, short-term symptom resolution is the norm. Long-term prognosis is less clear, but there is fair evidence that most patients will have lumbar symptoms compared with the general population. There is also fair evidence that some patients will develop significant symptoms as adults and will undergo surgical treatment. There is insufficient knowledge to predict which patients will continue to do well in the long term with conservative or no treatment and which patients will develop symptoms significant enough to warrant early intervention., Conclusions: The current medical literature provides fair to good evidence for clinically relevant questions regarding the etiology, prevalence, natural history, and prognosis of pediatric spondylolysis., (Copyright © 2015 Scoliosis Research Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)