Back to Search Start Over

Correction and Maintenance of Cervical Alignment: 3-Level ACDF Versus Corpectomy-ACDF "Hybrid" Procedures.

Authors :
Campion C
Crawford CH 3rd
Glassman SD
Berkay F
Mkorombindo T
Carreon LY
Source :
Clinical spine surgery [Clin Spine Surg] 2023 May 01; Vol. 36 (4), pp. E118-E122. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Sep 09.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Study Design: Longitudinal observational comparative cohorts.<br />Objective: The objective of this study is to compare 3 and 12-month radiographic sagittal parameters and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients who underwent 3-level ACDF or a hybrid procedure.<br />Summary of Background Data: Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF), Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion (ACCF), and hybrids (combination ACCF-ACDF) are common procedures used to treat symptomatic cervical spondylosis. Although there is a relative abundance of literature comparing 1-level ACCF versus 2-level ACDF and 2-level ACCF versus 3-level ACDF, detailed comparisons of 3-level ACDF versus hybrid procedures have not been extensively addressed.<br />Methods: Patients who underwent a 3-Level ACDF (3L-ACDF, N=47) or 1-Level Corpectomy/1-Level ACDF (Hybrid, N=52) with at least a 12-month post-op data available were identified. Standard demographic, surgical and PROs were collected in addition to preoperative and postoperative radiographic data, including C2 plumb line (C2PL), C2-C7 lordosis (CL), segmental lordosis (SL), and T1 slope (T1S).<br />Results: The 2 cohorts were similar in terms of demographics. At 3 months post-op, CL (9.04° vs. -2.12°, P =0.00) and SL (6.06° vs. -2.26°, P =0.003) were significantly greater in the 3L-ACDF group versus the HYBRID group. This significant difference was maintained at 12 months postoperative for CL [(6.62° vs. -0.60°, P =0.015) but not for SL (2.36° vs. -1.09°, P =0.199)]. There were no differences in PROs between the 2 groups before surgery, at 3 months postoperative or 12 months postoperative. Seven patients required revision surgery in the 1-year study period (1 in the 3L-ACDF, and 6 in the Hybrid P <0.001).<br />Conclusions: Three level ACDF resulted in greater C2-C7 lordosis and segmental lordosis postoperatively, which was maintained at 1 year for cervical lordosis. While PROs were similar between the groups, patients with hybrid instrumentation required significantly more revision surgeries than those treated with 3-level ACDF.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2380-0194
Volume :
36
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical spine surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
36097344
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001392