Back to Search Start Over

The Effect of Implant Density on Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Fusion: Results of the Minimize Implants Maximize Outcomes Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors :
Larson AN
Polly DW
Sponseller PD
Kelly MP
Richards BS
Garg S
Parent S
Shah SA
Weinstein SL
Crawford CH 3rd
Sanders JO
Blakemore LC
Oetgen ME
Fletcher ND
Kremers WK
Marks MC
Brearley AM
Aubin CE
Sucato DJ
Labelle H
Erickson MA
Source :
The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume [J Bone Joint Surg Am] 2024 Feb 07; Vol. 106 (3), pp. 180-189. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 07.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) can be treated with instrumented fusion, but the number of anchors needed for optimal correction is controversial.<br />Methods: We conducted a multicenter, randomized study that included patients undergoing spinal fusion for single thoracic curves between 45° and 65°, the most common form of operatively treated AIS. Of the 211 patients randomized, 108 were assigned to a high-density screw pattern and 103, to a low-density screw pattern. Surgeons were instructed to use ≥1.8 implants per spinal level fused for patients in the high-implant-density group or ≤1.4 implants per spinal level fused for patients in the low-implant-density group. The primary outcome measure was the percent correction of the coronal curve at the 2-year follow-up. The power analysis for this trial required 174 patients to show equivalence, defined as a 95% confidence interval (CI) within a ±10% correction margin with a probability of 90%.<br />Results: In the intention-to-treat analysis, the mean percent correction of the coronal curve was equivalent between the high-density and low-density groups at the 2-year follow-up (67.6% versus 65.7%; difference, -1.9% [95% CI: -6.1%, 2.2%]). In the per-protocol cohorts, the mean percent correction of the coronal curve was also equivalent between the 2 groups at the 2-year follow-up (65.0% versus 66.1%; difference, 1.1% [95% CI: -3.0%, 5.2%]). A total of 6 patients in the low-density group and 5 patients in the high-density group required reoperation (p = 1.0).<br />Conclusions: In the setting of spinal fusion for primary thoracic AIS curves between 45° and 65°, the percent coronal curve correction obtained with use of a low-implant-density construct and that obtained with use of a high-implant-density construct were equivalent.<br />Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.<br />Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article ( http://links.lww.com/JBJS/H763 ).<br /> (Copyright © 2023 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1535-1386
Volume :
106
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37973031
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.23.00178