Search

Plasma drug-resistant minority human immunodeficiency virus type 1 variants (DRMVs) increase the risk of virological failure to first-line non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor antiretroviral therapy (ART). The origin of DRMVs in ART-naive patients, however, remains unclear. In a large pan-European case-control study investigating the clinical relevance of pre-existing DRMVs using 454 pyrosequencing, the six most prevalent plasma DRMVs detected corresponded to G-to-A nucleotide mutations (V90I, V106I, V108I, E138K, M184I and M230I). Here, we evaluated if such DRMVs could have emerged from apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide 3G/F (APOBEC3G/F) activity. Out of 236 ART-naive subjects evaluated, APOBEC3G/F hypermutation signatures were detected in plasma viruses of 14 (5.9%) individuals. Samples with minority E138K, M184I, and M230I mutations, but not those with V90I, V106I or V108I, were significantly associated with APOBEC3G/F activity (Fisher's P0.005), defined as the presence of0.5% of sample sequences with an APOBEC3G/F signature. Mutations E138K, M184I and M230I co-occurred in the same sequence as APOBEC3G/F signatures in 3/9 (33%), 5/11 (45%) and 4/8 (50%) of samples, respectively; such linkage was not found for V90I, V106I or V108I. In-frame STOP codons were observed in 1.5% of all clonal sequences; 14.8% of them co-occurred with APOBEC3G/F signatures. APOBEC3G/F-associated E138K, M184I and M230I appeared within clonal sequences containing in-frame STOP codons in 2/3 (66%), 5/5 (100%) and 4/4 (100%) of the samples. In a re-analysis of the parent case control study, the presence of APOBEC3G/F signatures was not associated with virological failure. In conclusion, the contribution of APOBEC3G/F editing to the development of DRMVs is very limited and does not affect the efficacy of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor ART.

Objectives: We studied gp41 mutations associated with failing enfuvirtide salvage therapy. Methods: This multicentre study involved patients with HIV-1 plasma viral load (pVL) > 5000 copies/mL after at least 3 months of uninterrupted enfuvirtide therapy and with plasma samples available at inclusion (TO), at initial enfuvirtide failure (T1) and at last follow-up visit during continued failing enfuvirtide therapy (T2). The HR-1 and HR-2 domains of the gp41 gene were sequenced at TO, T1 and T2. Results: Ninety-nine patients were enrolled. At baseline, the median pVL and CD4 cell count were 5.1 log copies/mL and 72 cells/mm 3 , respectively. Based on the ANRS Resistance Group algorithm, the proportion of patients harbouring viruses with enfuvirtide resistance mutations increased significantly between TO and T1. In the HR-1 domain, the V38A/M, Q40H, N42T, N43D and L45M mutations were selected (P< 0.02). In the HR-2 domain, no mutations were significantly selected during the follow-up. None of the mutations was associated with a CD4 cell count increment. Conclusions: Mutations selected during failing enfuvirtide salvage therapy are mainly located in the HR-1 domain of the gp41 gene, between codons 38 and 45. No mutations were associated with an increase in the CD4 cell count.

To treat human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients, international guidelines recommend the combination of two nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors [N(t)RTIs] and a third agent [non-NRTI (NNRTI), boosted protease inhibitor (r/PI) or integrase inhibitor (INI)] for initial treatment. The objective of this study was to compare the selection of resistance to antiretrovirals (ARVs) for regimens containing or lacking N(t)RTIs in patients experiencing their first virological failure. Eligible patients had a first virological failure, defined as the occurrence of two consecutive HIV plasma viral loads ≥50copies/mL. Genotypic resistance testing was performed at the time of virological failure (on the second sample with detectable viral load ≥50copies/mL) in patients failing regimens of N(t)RTIs+r/PI or NNRTI or INI, r/PI+NNRTI or INI, and INI+NNRTI. Among 434 virological failures analysed, resistance testing results were available in 416 cases (95.9%). Higher rates of drug resistance were observed in patients receiving N(t)RTI-sparing regimens. When the combination of N(t)RTIs+r/PI was used, PIs protect themselves and the associated N(t)RTIs from the selection of resistance; however, this was not observed with the NNRTI+r/PI combination. The same phenomenon was observed for raltegravir: when used in combination with N(t)RTIs, INI resistance mutations were less frequently selected compared with its use in combination with PIs or NNRTIs. In conclusion, regimens of the ARV classes combined impact the frequency of resistance development. Lower resistance is observed for N(t)RTI-based regimens, with more therapeutic options for subsequent regimens after failure.

In the context of simplification strategies, it is essential to know the feasibility of a switch to a rilpivirine-based therapy. The aim of this study was to describe rilpivirine, tenofovir and emtricitabine resistance in HIV-1-infected patients who experienced virological failure during their previous antiretroviral treatment.The studied population included two groups of patients, all rilpivirine naive, tested for resistance by bulk sequencing from 2008 to 2011: the first group (n = 998) failing a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) plus boosted protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimen and the second group (n = 3733) failing an NRTI plus non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based regimen.In the first group, the frequency of rilpivirine mutations and resistance to rilpivirine (5.1%) was similar to that in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients. Among the 1605 patients from the second group with at least one NNRTI mutation in their HIV, the prevalence of viruses 'resistant' or 'possibly resistant' to efavirenz, nevirapine and etravirine was 78%, 79% and 74%, respectively, while 59% were resistant to rilpivirine. Resistance to rilpivirine was significantly more frequent in non-B subtype versus B subtype viruses. Among pretreated patients with viruses with at least one NNRTI mutation (other than for rilpivirine), 22% of sequences were susceptible to the combination rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.In patients failing an NRTI plus NNRTI-based regimen, to know the feasibility of a switch to rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, reliable resistance information should be available at the time of use of concurrent NNRTI therapy.

OBJECTIVES The prevalence of rilpivirine, emtricitabine and tenofovir resistance-associated mutations (RAMs), described in vitro and in vivo, was determined in antiretroviral-naive patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS From 2008 to 2011, 1729 treatment-naive patients were tested for resistance by bulk sequencing. We studied the primary rilpivirine RAMs (K101E/P, E138A/G/K/Q/R, V179L, Y181C/I/V, H221Y, F227C and M230I/L) and other potential rilpivirine-associated mutations (V90I, L100I, K101T, E138S, V179D/I, Y188L, V189I, G190A/E/S and M230V). We also studied the M184V/I and K65R mutations for emtricitabine and tenofovir, respectively. RESULTS Among 1729 sequences, half of patients had B-subtype viruses and the other half non-B (with 26.7% CRF02, n=461). Primary rilpivirine RAMs were infrequent (4.6%, n=79) and the most prevalent were E138A (3%, n=52), E138K, (0.3%, n=5), H221Y (0.3%, n=5), E138G (0.2%, n=4) and Y181C (0.2%, n=4). The frequency of the primary rilpivirine RAMs was similar between B and non-B subtypes. The other potential rilpivirine-associated mutations that were most prevalent were V179I (8.4%, n=145), V90I (3.8%, n=65) and V189I (2.3%, n=40). The common V179I, V189I and V90I polymorphisms have not been associated with virological failure in Phase 3 clinical studies. By the ANRS algorithm, 4.9% (n=84) of samples were resistant to rilpivirine, 3.7% (n=32) of B-subtype viruses versus 6% (n=52) of non-B-subtype viruses (P=0.02, χ(2) test). The prevalence of K65R and M184I/V was 0.06% (1/1729) and 1% (18/1729), respectively. The prevalence of K103N was 2% (35/1729). CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of rilpivirine, emtricitabine and tenofovir resistance mutations was very low in antiretroviral-naive patients. The prevalence of resistance to rilpivirine (4.9%, n=84) was not statistically different from the prevalence of efavirenz and nevirapine resistance in our population.

Background The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of antiretroviral drug resistance mutations in HIV-1 from recently diagnosed and untreated patients living in Conakry, Guinea-Conakry and in Niamey, Niger. Methods The study was performed in two countries of Western Africa – Guinea-Conakry and Niger – using the same survey method in both sites. All newly HIV-1 diagnosed patients, naive of antiretroviral drugs, were consecutively included during September 2009 in each of the two sites. Protease and reverse transcriptase sequencing was performed using the ANRS procedures. Drug resistance mutations were identified according to the 2009 update surveillance drug resistance mutations. Results In Conakry, 99 patients were included, most of whom (89%) were infected with CRF02_AG recombinant virus. Resistance analysis among the 93 samples showed that ≥1 drug resistance mutation was observed in 8 samples, leading to a prevalence of primary resistance of 8.6% (95% CI 2.91–14.29%). In Niamey, 96 patients were included; a high diversity in HIV-1 subtypes was observed with 47 (51%) patients infected with CRF02_AG. Resistance analysis performed among the 92 samples with successful genotypic resistance test showed that ≥1 drug resistance mutation was observed in 6 samples, leading to a prevalence of primary resistance of 6.5% (95% CI 1.50–11.50%). Conclusions We reported the first antiretroviral drug resistance survey studies in antiretroviral-naive patients living in Guinea-Conakry and in Niger. The prevalence of resistance was between 6% and 9% in both sites, which is higher than most of the other countries from Western Africa region.

CONTEXT Presence of low frequency or minority human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV 1) drug resistance mutations may adversely affect response to antiretroviral treatment (ART) but evidence regarding the effects of such mutations on the effectiveness of first line ART is conflicting. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association of preexisting drug resistant HIV 1 minority variants with risk of first line nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) based antiretroviral virologic failure. DATA SOURCES Systematic review of published and unpublished studies in PubMed (1966 through December 2010) EMBASE (1974 through December 2010) conference abstracts and article references. Authors of all studies were contacted for detailed laboratory ART and adherence data. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA ABSTRACTION: Studies involving ART naive participants initiating NNRTI based regimens were included. Participants were included if all drugs in their ART regimen were fully active by standard HIV drug resistance testing. Cox proportional hazard models using pooled patient level data were used to estimate the risk of virologic failure based on a Prentice weighted case cohort analysis stratified by study. DATA SYNTHESIS Individual data from 10 studies and 985 participants were available for the primary analysis. Low frequency drug resistance mutations were detected in 187 participants including 117 of 808 patients in the cohort studies. Low frequency HIV 1 drug resistance mutations were associated with an increased risk of virologic failure (hazard ratio (HR] 2.3 [95 confidence interval {CI} 1.7 3.3]; P < .001) after controlling for medication adherence race/ethnicity baseline CD4 cell count and plasma HIV 1 RNA levels. Increased risk of virologic failure was most strongly associated with minority variants resistant to NNRTIs (HR 2.6 [95 CI 1.9 3.5]; P < .001). Among participants from the cohort studies 35 of those with detectable minority variants experienced virologic failure compared with 15 of those without minority variants. The presence of minority variants was associated with 2.5 to 3 times the risk of virologic failure at either 95 or greater or less than 95 overall medication adherence. A dose dependent increased risk of virologic failure was found in participants with a higher proportion or quantity of drug resistant variants. CONCLUSION In a pooled analysis low frequency HIV 1 drug resistance mutations particularly involving NNRTI resistance were significantly associated with a dose dependent increased risk of virologic failure with first line ART.

An integrated computational and statistical approach was used to determine the association of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) nevirapine, efavirenz and etravirine with resistance mutations that cause therapeutic failure and their impact on NNRTI resistance. Mutations detected for nevirapine virological failure with a prevalence greater than 10 % in the used patient set were: K103N, Y181C, G190A, and K101E. A support vector regression model, based on matched genotypic/phenotypic data (n=850), showed that among 6365 analyzed mutations, K103N, Y181C and G190A have the first, third, and sixth greatest significance for nevirapine resistance, respectively. The most common indicator of treatment failure for efavirenz was K103N mutation present in 56.7 % of the patients where the drug failed, followed by V108I, L100I, and G190A. For efavirenz resistance, K103N, G190, and L100I have the first, fourth, and eighth greatest significance, respectively, as determined in support vector regression model. No positive interactions were observed among nevirapine resistance mutations, while a more complex situation was observed with treatment failure of efavirenz and etravirine, characterized by the accumulation of multiple mutations. Docking simulations and free energy analysis based on docking scores of mutated human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RT complexes were used to evaluate the influence of selected mutations on drug recognition. Results from support vector regression were confirmed by docking analysis. In particular, for nevirapine and efavirenz, a single mutation K103N was associated with the most unfavorable energetic profile compared to the wild-type sequence. This is in line with recent clinical data reporting that diarylpyrimidine etravirine, a very potent third generation drug effective against a wide range of drug-resistant HIV-1 variants, shows increased affinity towards K103N/S mutants due to its high conformational flexibility.

Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of transmitted drug resistance mutations and non-B subtype circulation in antiretroviral-naive chronically HIV-1-infected patients in France. Methods: Resistance mutations were sought in samples from 530 newly diagnosed HIV-1-infected patients from October 2006 to March 2007. Protease and reverse transcriptase mutations were identified from the 2007 Stanford Resistance Surveillance list. Results: Reverse transcriptase and protease resistance mutations were determined in 466 patients with duration of seropositivity

Susceptibility to etravirine (ETR), an expanded-spectrum nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), is dependent on the type and number of NNRTI resistance-associated mutations (RAMs). Studies have shown that some HIV-1 subtypes may have natural polymorphisms described as ETR RAMs. This study addresses the prevalence of ETR RAMs in treatment-naïve patients infected with HIV-1 non-B subtypes and its potential impact on ETR susceptibility. The prevalence of ETR RAMs in 726 antiretroviral-naïve patients infected with non-B HIV-1 subtypes was studied. ETR genotypic resistance was interpreted according to Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le SIDA and Stanford algorithms. NNRTI phenotypic susceptibilities of samples with at least one ETR RAM were measured. Overall, 75 (10.3%) of 726 sequences harbored at least one ETR RAM: sequences from 72 patients (10%) each had one ETR RAM, and sequences from 3 patients (0.4%) each had two ETR RAMs (V90I and Y181C in one case and V90I and A98G in two cases). None of the viruses had three or more ETR RAMs, and none were consequently classified as resistant to ETR. All sequences with two ETR RAMs belonged to subtype CRF02_AG. The presence of one ETR RAM was statistically more frequent in subtype CRF02_AG than in other non-B subtypes (P= 0.004). Three new mutation profiles (E138A and V179I, Y181C and H221Y, and V90I and Y181C) showing decreased ETR phenotypic susceptibility were identified. In conclusion, although the prevalence of ETR RAMs in treatment-naïve patients infected with non-B HIV-1 subtypes was 10%, in most cases this had no significant impact on ETR susceptibility. However, the transmission of drug-resistant viruses with Y181C in a non-B genetic background has a potential for impact on ETR susceptibility.

To identify factors associated with virological response (VR) to an etravirine (ETR)-based regimen, 243 patients previously treated with nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) were studied. The impact of baseline HIV-1 RNA, CD4 cell count, past NNRTIs used, 57 NNRTI resistance mutations, genotypic sensitivity score (GSS) for nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and protease inhibitors (PIs), and the number of new drugs used with ETR for the first time on the VR to an ETR regimen were investigated. Among the 243 patients, the median baseline HIV-1 RNA level was 4.4 log10copies/ml (interquartile range [IQR], 3.7 to 4.9) and the median CD4 count was 175 cells/mm3(IQR, 69 to 312). Patients had been previously exposed to a median of 6 NRTIs, 1, NNRTI, and 5 PIs. Overall, 82% of patients achieved a VR at month 2, as defined by a decrease of at least 1.5 log10copies/ml and/or HIV-1 RNA level of

International audience; BACKGROUND: The efficacy of raltegravir plus optimized background therapy (OBT) has been demonstrated for antiretroviral (ARV)-experienced HIV-1-infected patients in randomized clinical trials. We studied viro-immunological response, pharmacokinetic parameters and genotypic test results in an observational cohort of multiple ARV class-experienced patients starting a raltegravir-based regimen. METHODS: Already enrolled ANRS CO3 Aquitaine Cohort patients with virological failure were included in this study after starting a raltegravir-based regimen (400 mg twice a day, week 0). Virological success was defined by the plasma HIV-1 RNA level [viral load (VL)] or =1 and or =2 (P = 0.02), respectively. Raltegravir-related mutations emerged in 9 of 11 failing patients (82%): Q148H/R (n = 5), N155S/H (n = 3) and S230N (n = 1). Median CD4 increases from week 0 to week 4 and week 24 were 28 (-4, 85) and 57 (0, 156) cells/mm(3), respectively. A poor immune response was independently associated with a lower VL decline (week 0 to week 12) [odds ratio (OR): 3.5, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.4, 8.4, for 1 log(10) less] and CD4+% at baseline (OR: 2.6, 95% CI: 0.97, 8.3, for 10% lower). CONCLUSIONS: Raltegravir plus OBT provided a good virological success rate in highly pre-treated patients under clinical routine conditions.

Background: Transmission of drug-resistant variants is influenced by several factors, including the HIV-1 RNA levels in HIV-1 -infected patients. Our study describes the transmitted drug-resistant virus among 1446 French patients diagnosed at the time of primary infection and included from 1996 to 2006 along with the proportion of chronically infected treated patients in the French Hospital Database on HIV (FHDH). Methods: Genotypic resistance tests were performed at the time of primary infection. The proportion of patients with viral load

Phylogenetic reconstructions of transmission events from individuals with acute human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection are conducted to illustrate this group's heightened infectivity. Varied definitions of acute infection and assumptions about observed phylogenetic clusters may produce misleading results. We conducted a phylogenetic analysis of HIV pol sequences from 165 European patients with estimated infection dates and calculated the difference between dates within clusters. Nine phylogenetic clusters were observed. Comparison of dates within clusters revealed that only 2 could have been generated during acute infection. Previous analyses may have incorrectly assigned transmission events to the acutely HIV infected when they were more likely to have occurred during chronic infection.

The transmission of HIV-1 variants with resistance to antiretroviral therapy can impair response to first-line antiretroviral therapy. The current genotypic tests used for surveillance of HIV-1 resistance and routine management of antiretroviral therapy have a limit of sensitivity of approximately 20% of the bulk viral population for the detection of minority variants. Ultrasensitive genotypic techniques have been developed and are able to increase the detection of minority-resistant viruses in a significant proportion of antiretroviral-naive patients. De novo production and transmission of minority variants are discussed. Discordant results have been reported considering the clinical relevance of minority resistant variants and their impact on first-line therapy, which could be due to treatment regimens and the duration of infection.

This study demonstrates for the first time HIV-1 resistance mutations to all classes of antiretroviral drugs available in Algeria (NRTIs, NNRTIs, PIs) in treated patients at failure. Moreover, it is shown that mutations to NRTIs and PIs can be observed in untreated patients in this country where there is high HIV-1 diversity.

To identify mutations associated with the virological response (VR) to a tipranavir-ritonavir (TPV/r)-based regimen, 143 patients previously treated with protease inhibitor (PI) were studied. VR was defined by a decrease of at least 1 log10in, or undetectable, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA at month 3. The effect of each mutation in the protease, considering all variants at a residue as a single variable, on the VR to TPV/r was investigated. Mutations at six residues were associated with a lower VR (E35D/G/K/N, M36I/L/V, Q58E, Q61D/E/G/H/N/R, H69I/K/N/Q/R/Y, and L89I/M/R/T/V), and one mutation was associated with a higher VR (F53L/W/Y). The genotypic score M36I/L/V − F53L/W/Y + Q58E + H69I/K/N/Q/R/Y + L89I/M/R/T/V was selected as providing a strong association with VR. For the seven patients with a genotypic score of −1 (viruses with only mutation at codon 53), the percentage of responders was 100% and the percentages were 79%, 56%, 33%, 21%, and 0% for those with scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The percentage of patients showing a response to TPV/r was lower for patients infected with non-clade B viruses (n= 16, all non-B subtypes considered together) than for those infected with clade B viruses (n= 127) (25% and 59%, respectively;P= 0.015). Most mutations associated with VR to TPV/r had not previously been associated with PI resistance. This is consistent with phenotypic analysis showing that TPV has a unique resistance profile. Mutations at five positions (35, 36, 61, 69, and 89) were observed significantly more frequently in patients infected with a non-B subtype than in those infected with the B subtype, probably explaining the lower VR observed in these patients.

Background HIV type-1 (HIV-1) has been shown to be frequently transmitted by acutely infected patients. We investigated the relationship between the dynamics of HIV-1 transmission within recently infected patients, the HIV-1 variability and the transmission of antiretroviral drug resistance. Methods We included patients infected between 1996 and 2006, with a plasma sample obtained Results Genotypic resistance was detected in 37/263 (14.1%) patients. Patients were infected by HIV-1 clade B in 222 (84%) cases and with non-B subtypes in 41 (16%). A total of 80 (30.4%) RT sequences were segregated in 24 clusters with bootstrap values >98% for 22 clusters. The frequency of grouping in clusters was higher within B sequences compared with non-B sequences (35.1% versus 4.9%; P-4). Drug-resistant isolates were retrieved in only 3 clusters, but the prevalence of resistance in clustering viruses (10/80, 12.5%) was not different than in isolated sequences. Conclusions The segregation into clusters suggested frequent forward transmission events in patients infected with HIV-1 subtype B, including the possibility of transmission of drug-resistant isolates. These findings warrant increasing prevention efforts and serological screening in the at-risk populations.

We developed clinically relevant genotypic scores for resistance to fosamprenavir/ritonavir in HIV-1 protease inhibitor (PI)-experienced patients.PI-experienced patients with virological failure receiving fosamprenavir/ritonavir as the sole PI for at least 3 months and with detectable fosamprenavir plasma levels were included. The impact of baseline protease mutations on virological response (VR, i.e. decrease in plasma HIV-1 RNA between baseline and month 3) was analysed using the Mann-Whitney test. Mutations with prevalence10% and P value0.10 were retained. The Jonckheere-Terpstra test was used to select the combination of mutations most strongly associated with VR. The association between score and VR was assessed by multivariate backward regression.In the 73 patients included, the median baseline HIV-1 RNA was 4.6 log(10) copies/mL (range: 2.7-6.9) and the mean decrease at month 3 was -1.07 +/- 1.40 log(10) copies/mL. Ninety per cent of the patients were infected by HIV-1 subtype B variants. Two fosamprenavir/ritonavir mutation scores were constructed: score A (L10F/I/V + L33F + M36I + I54L/M/V/A/T/S + I62V + V82A/F/C/G + I84V + L90M) was based only on mutations associated with a worse VR, whereas score B (L10FIV + L33F + M36I + I54L/M/V/A/T/S + A71V - V77I - N88S + L90M) also took into account favourable mutations. Both scores were independent predictors of VR, however, co-administration of tenofovir was associated with a worse VR and the presence of the N88S protease mutation and co-administration of enfuvirtide with a better VR.These clinically validated mutation scores should be of interest for the clinical management of PI-experienced patients. The fosamprenavir/ritonavir score A was introduced in the 2006 ANRS algorithm along with isolated mutations I50V and V32I + I47V.

We performed HIV-1 drug resistance genotypic analysis of viral isolates from 100 antiretroviral (ARV)-naive, recently HIV-1-infected (between 2002 and 2006) individuals from Abidjan (Côte d'Ivoire). The overall prevalence of HIV-1 variants with resistance mutations to reverse transcriptase, protease, or fusion inhibitors was 6%. The majority of isolates were CRF02_AG. Compared with a previous study carried out by our group in 2001-2002 in a similar population in Abidjan, our findings confirm the circulation and transmission of HIV-1 carrying key ARV drug resistance mutation.

BackgroundTransmission of HIV-1 variants with resistance to reverse transcriptase (RT) and protease inhibitors has been widely characterized in developed countries. However, no clear evidence of primary resistance to HIV-1 fusion inhibitors has been shown so far. We wished to investigate the possibility of genotypic resistance to enfuvirtide (T20) in a cohort of antiretroviral-naive, recently infected patients.MethodsWe included patients from the Aquitaine Cohort with an estimated date of seroconversion in 2004 and 2005, a plasma sample obtained less than 18 months after seroconversion and no prior history of antiretroviral therapy. RT, protease and gp41 sequences were determined by direct population sequencing from plasma samples and drug resistance mutations were reported.ResultsA total of 55 patients were included in the study. The overall prevalence of transmitted HIV-1 resistance was 20%. Two patients had viruses with resistance mutations to T20. The first case had an N42D mutation in the HR1 region of the gp41, along with transmitted resistance mutations in the protease (D30N, M36I, N88D) and in the RT (M41L, L210W, T215D). The second case had a G36D HR1 mutation, with no evidence of other drug resistance mutations.ConclusionWe have shown the first cases of primary resistance to T20 in recently infected patients in southwestern France. Epidemiological surveillance of the transmission of drug-resistant HIV-1 should include the resistance to T20.

Resume Objectif Decrire la reponse immunovirologique et la tolerance sous lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) chez des patients pretraites par inhibiteurs de protease (IP) et en echec virologique prolonge. Patients et methode Suivi prospectif dans la cohorte Aproco-Copilote de 121 patients mis sous LPV/r en situation d'echec virologique prolonge (mediane 30,6 mois) avec une charge virale (CV) mediane de 4,1 log 10 copies/ml et un taux de CD4 median de 273/mm 3 . Resultats A j0 de LPV/r, ces 121 patients avaient recu de multiples lignes d'antiretroviraux (ARV) : 62 % au moins quatre inhibiteurs nucleosidiques de la transcriptase inverse (INTI), 65 % au moins un inhibiteur non nucleosidique (INNTI) et 33 % au moins 3 IP. A l'introduction du LPV/r, les autres ARV associes ont ete : aucune autre nouvelle molecule ( n = 49 ; 40 %), au moins un nouvel ARV ( n = 72) : un INTI ( n = 42), deux INTI ( n = 22), un INNTI ( n = 10), au moins un nouvel IP ( n = 6), enfuvirtide ( n = 2). La CV mediane etait de 2 log 10 copies/ml a M4 et M12, de 1,7 log 10 copies/ml a M24 avec respectivement 74, 71 et 85 % de patients avec une CV inferieure a 2,7 log 10 copies/ml. Le taux de CD4 median etait de 385/mm 3 a M12 et de 429/mm 3 a M24. Quatre-vingt-quinze pour cent des patients avec un genotype avant LPV/r avaient au plus 5 mutations sur la protease. Trente evenements indesirables graves sont survenus dont six imputables au LPV/r. Conclusion Chez ces patients multitraites et en situation d'echec virologique prolonge, on constate un reel et durable benefice immunovirologique apres la mise sous LPV/r.

ObjectiveTo study the antiviral efficacy and the mutations selected by a triple therapy with zidovudine (AZT), lamivudine (3TC) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF).MethodsAntiretroviral-naive patients received 300 mg AZT/150 mg 3TC twice a day plus 300 mg TDF once a day in an open pilot study. Follow-up was assessed at baseline therapy (M0) and at months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12. Reverse transcriptase (RT) genotypic resistance analysis and in selected cases, a recombinant drug susceptibility and replication capacity assay were performed from plasma RNA at baseline and in case of virological failure (VF); that is, rebound of viral load >50 copies/ml on therapy.ResultsTwenty-four patients were included. At baseline, the median CD4+T-cell count was 443 cells/μl and the median plasma viral load (VL) was 4.38 log10copies/ml. RT resistance mutations were observed at M0 in 4 patients. At M12, the proportion of patients with a VL +T cells at M12 was 94 cells/μl. Four patients had a VF on therapy: two with wild-type viruses, one with selection of M184V and thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs) on a background of TAMs, and one with selection of K65R and M184V, with a replication capacity at 2.4%.ConclusionThe virological response in our study demonstrates the antiviral efficacy of the AZT/3TC/TDF combination therapy, which needs further evaluation. The moderate frequency of selection of K65R could be due to the presence of AZT in the regimen.

HIV-1 nucleoside/tide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI)-only based, comprising tenofovir DF(TDF) have been shown to lead to high rates of virological failures (VF), mainly in patients on first-line combination therapy. We wished to investigate the virological response to these regimens in a large cohort of antiretroviral (ARV)-treated patients.Patients followed-up in the Aquitaine Cohort in 2001-2003 and who had received NRTI-based, TDF-including regimens for at least 3 months were included. The VF was defined as: (i) a decrease in plasma HIV-1 RNA0.5 log(10)copies/ml between M0 and M3; or (ii) a plasma HIV-1 RNA50 copies/ml at M3 in patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA50 copies/ml at M0. The baseline RT genotype was determined in a subgroup of patients.Within 121 patients (95% ARV-experienced) who received either lamivudine (3TC)/didanosine (DDI)/TDF (n=48), or abacavir (ABC)/3TC/TDF (n=14), or 3TC/zidovudine (ZDV)/TDF (n=27), or 3TC/ZDV/ABC/TDF (n=20), or DDI/ABC/TDF (n=12), the ABC/3TC/TDF and DDI/ABC/TDF combinations were associated with the highest frequencies of VF. In contrast the use of ZDV was related to a better virological response. The baseline RT genotype was also predictive of the virological outcome.NRTI-based, TDF-including therapies can lead to high rates of VF both in ARV-naïve and in ARV-experienced patients. Our data strongly suggest the interest of associating ZDV and TDF in these regimens.

To assess the genotypic determinants of the virological response (VR) to didanosine (ddI) in nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI)-experienced patients.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) genotype was determined at baseline in 74 ddI-naive-patients with baseline viral load500 copies/ml and receiving ddI as part of a new regimen. VR was defined as a plasma HIV-1 RNA50 copies/ml after three months on ddI. NRTI resistance mutations associated with higher or lower frequencies of VR with a p-value0.25 were retained in different sets of mutations, where the mutations associated with a worse VR were added, whereas the mutations associated with a better VR were subtracted. The most significant mutation scores were then studied in a multivariate analysis.Changes at three codons (M41L, L210W, T215Y/F/D/C/E) were associated with a worse VR and three mutations (K70R, M184V, K219Q) with a better VR. The strongest association with the VR was obtained with the score M41L+L210W+T215Y/F/D/C/E-K70R-K219Q. The score was independently associated with the VR in the multivariate analysis.Taking into account the mutations associated with a better VR may improve genotypic resistance algorithms. Our results are of interest for the management of antiretroviral therapy in NRTI-experienced patients.

Sequence analysis of HIV-1 from 440 therapy-naive individuals included within the CASCADE study, who seroconverted within 18 months of the last negative test, identified 65 persons infected with a strain carrying resistance-associated mutations. Population-based sequencing was performed for 20 of these individuals during the therapy-free follow-up period. The median time of follow-up was 15 months (interquartile range from 10 to 23 months). Of these individuals, 12 showed subsequent evolution at the resistance positions, whereas the virus of 8 people was stable during this period. In the reverse transcriptase (RT) gene, the drug-resistant 215Y or 215F codons evolved to alternative codons in all six cases, 70R reverted to the wild-type 70K in 3 of the 4 individuals, 67N evolved only in 1 of 4 patients to a wild-type 67D, 215S evolved to wild-type 215T in 1 of 3 patients, 219N evolved to 219K in 1 of 2 patients, and one patient with 184V reversed to the wild-type 184M. The 181C variant evolved to the wild-type 181Y in 1 of 2 individuals. These codon changes were caused by single nucleotide mutations. No evolution was observed for other RT mutations: 41L, 69D, 69N, 190S, 210W, 215L, 215C, 215E and 219Q. In the protease gene, resistance mutations 84V and 90M were stable in 2 individuals. Comparing the CD4+ T-cell count of the 12 evolving versus the 8 stable cases revealed no statistically significant difference at the date of the first sequence following seroconversion. Interestingly, a lower CD4+ T-cell count was observed in the group without evolution at the second sequence time point ( P=0.043). No difference in HIV-1 RNA load was observed. These results, together with the apparent pressure to mutate at the resistance-associated positions exemplify the decreased fitness of viruses carrying 215Y/F, 70R or 184V

Nevirapine (NVP) single dose is widely used in developing countries to prevent HIV-1 mother-to-child transmission. However, this regimen selects key drug resistance mutations that can impair further HAART efficacy. We studied the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase genotype from 29 Ivoirian women 1 month after an NVP single-dose prophylaxis. NVP resistance mutations were observed in six (20.7%) women. The majority of the isolates were CRF02_AG. These results confirm previous studies and suggest the need for different prophylaxis regimens in this setting.

Background: In HIV-infected patients on first-line antiretroviral therapy, the significance of intermittent viremia and their relationship with drug resistance remain unclear. Objective: To study the virological characteristics of intermittent viremia (IV) and the association between IV and later virological failure (VF) in patients on a first-line, PI-containing therapy. Study design: Antiretroviral-naive patients were enrolled in the APROVIR substudy of the prospective, multicenter APROCO cohort at the time they initiated a PI-containing therapy and were followed-up at month 1 and every 2 months. IV was defined as plasma HIV-1 RNA > 500 copies/ml on a single specimen. VF were defined as: (1) viral rebound on two consecutive plasma specimens with HIV-1 RNA > 500 copies/ml after an initial response below 500 copies/ml, or (2) persistence of plasma HIV-1 RNA ≥ 500 copies/ml during the first year of follow-up. Genotypic resistance analysis was performed at baseline and at the time of IV. PI plasma concentrations were determined at the time of IV. Results: IV was found in 20/219 patients in a 2 years follow-up. The occurrence of IV in the first year of therapy was associated with a higher risk of virological failure during the second year (p = 0.03). Genotypic resistance at the time of IV was found in only 4/16 patients and was not predictive of a subsequent virological failure. PI plasma levels suggested lack of adherence in 50% of patients with IV. Conclusion: The occurrence of IV > 500 copies/ml among patients on first-line, PI-containing ART is suggestive of a lack of adherence rather than the selection of resistant variants and should lead to an intensification of adherence monitoring in order to reduce the risk of subsequent VF.

The performance of French virology laboratories belonging to the ANRS network has been assessed annually for 3 years. The performance of these laboratories was compared between the years 2002 and 2003. Ten and 7 coded samples were sent to 38 virology laboratories in 2002 and 45 virology laboratories in 2003, respectively. Each panel of coded samples included at least one HIV-negative control, a pair of duplicate specimens, samples with a wide range of viral loads, and samples with a large number of resistance mutations. The laboratories used their standard sequencing procedures and were asked to report the amino acids at codons associated with resistance mutations, based on the IAS-USA expert panel list. The reference amino acid sequences were defined as those most frequently reported by the participants. The specificity of detection of RT mutations was significantly better in 2003 (99.9%) than in 2002 (99.7%) (P = 0.05). There was no difference between 2002 and 2003 in the specificity of detection of protease mutations (99.6% and 99.8%) or the sensitivity of detection of RT mutations (98.8% and 98.2%). The sensitivity of detection of protease mutations improved significantly between 2002 and 2003 (97.6% and 99.0%, respectively; P = 0.037). The proportion of laboratories reporting fully accurate results, in terms of amplification, specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility, tended to increase between 2002 and 2003 (P = 0.077). No errors were made by 19% of laboratories in 2002, compared to 42% in 2003. These results show the value of repeated external quality assessments.

The objective of the study was to estimate the prevalence of HIV-1 resistance to all drugs belonging to two or more antiretroviral drug (ARV) classes in treated patients in France. All genotyping assays performed in June 2001 and in November 2002 by the ANRS resistance laboratory network were analyzed by the ANRS algorithm. The 17 and 21 centers of the ANRS network participating in the study in 2001 and 2002, respectively, genotyped the viruses in plasma of 456 and 529 patients, respectively. In 2002, the proportions of patients harboring viruses fully resistant to one, two, and three ARV classes were 5.1%, 8.1%, and 2.5%, respectively. These results were similar to those obtained in 2001. In 2002, among the 56 patients with viruses completely resistant to at least two ARV classes, 98%, 96%, and 29% of patients had viruses with complete class resistance to NRTIs, NNRTIs, and PIs, respectively. Complete resistance to PIs was less frequent than full resistance to the other two ARV classes, and ritonavir-boosted amprenavir and lopinavir/r remained potentially active in respectively 71.4% and 42.9% of these 56 patients. In 2001 and 2002, respectively 30% of the 65 patients and 24% of the 56 patients with viruses completely resistant to at least two ARV classes were at an advanced stage of HIV disease, with CD4(+) cell counts below 200/microl and viral loads above 30 000 copies/ml. In France, the prevalence of HIV-1 viruses completely resistant to two or more ARV classes remained stable between 2001 and 2002. Resistance to RT inhibitors was more frequent than resistance to PIs in patients with viruses completely resistant to two or three classes of ARV.

Objective: To evaluate the frequency of drug-resistant HIV-1 viral strains from patients presenting with primary infection in 1999-2000 and to survey the molecular epidemiology of these viruses circulating in France. Methods: Resistance mutations were detected by sequencing the reverse transcriptase and the protease genes in plasma samples from 249 individuals. Phylogenetic analysis was performed on the reverse transcriptase genes. Results: Ten per cent of patients [26/249; 95% confidence interval (Cl) 7-15%] presented with virus mutations associated with resistance to at least one antiretroviral drug. The distribution of the resistance mutations was as follows: to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in 19 (8%; 95% Cl 5-12%) and to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in 10 (4%; 95% Cl 2-7%). Primary resistance mutations to protease inhibitors were detected in 14 (6%; 95% Cl 3-9%). Twelve patients (5%; 95% Cl 3-8%) presented with virus harbouring mutations associated with resistance to two or three classes of antiretroviral drugs. The median HIV RNA in plasma at enrolment was lower in patients with one or more drug resistance mutations than in patients with no mutations (5.05 log versus 5.47 log, P= 0.05). Phylogenetic analysis revealed that 19% (14-24%) of patients harboured HIV-1 non-B subtype strains; this proportion remained high when Caucasian patients only were considered (14%). Conclusion: This study, performed within the French network on HIV-1 primary infection survey, revealed no change in the frequency of resistant viral strains over time, but showed an increasing prevalence of non-B subtypes overall and among Caucasian individuals.

In 243 antiretroviral-naive human immunodeficiency-infected patients starting a first-line-protease inhibitor (mainly nelfinavir)-containing therapy, the presence of the polymorphism R57K in the protease at the inception of therapy was independently associated with a higher rate of virological failure.

A total of 107 HIV-1 isolates from untreated adult patients recruited in Abidjan, CMte d'Ivoire, in 2001 and 2002 were sequenced in the env, reverse transcriptase (RT), and protease genes. The results show that CRF02_AG is still predominant in this west African population; key mutations of resistance to antiretroviral drugs (NRTI, NNRTI, and PIs) were detected in 5.6% of the patients. We hypothesize that these resistant mutants have been acquired through horizontal transmission. Compared to a previous study carried out by our group in 1997-2000 in a similar population of Abidjan, it seems that there is a dynamic process of resistance and that a survey will be necessary.

The response to regimens including lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r) in patients who have received multiple protease (PR) inhibitors (PI) can be analyzed in terms of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) genotypic and pharmacokinetic (pK) determinants. We studied these factors and the evolution of HIV-1 resistance in response to LPV/r in a prospective study of patients receiving LPV/r under a temporary authorization in Bordeaux, France. HIV-1 PR and reverse transcriptase sequences were determined at baseline LPV/r for all the patients and at month 3 (M3) and M6 in the absence of response to treatment. pK measurements were determined at M1 and M3. Virological failure (VF) was defined as a plasma viral load ≥400 copies/ml at M3. A multivariate analysis of the predictors of VF, including clinical and biological characteristics and the treatment history of the patients, was performed. The PR gene sequence at M0, including individual mutations or a previously defined LPV mutation score (D. J. Kempf, J. D. Isaacson, M. S. King, S. C. Brun, Y. Xu, K. Real, B. M. Bernstein, A. J. Japour, E. Sun, and R. A. Rode, J. Virol. 75: 7262-7269, 2001), and the individual exposure to LPV were also included covariates. Sixty-eight patients were enrolled. Thirty-four percent had a virological response at M3. An LPV mutation score of >5 mutations, the presence of the PR I54V mutation at baseline, a high number of previous PIs, prior therapy with ritonavir or indinavir, absence of coprescription of efavirenz, and a lower exposure to LPV or lower LPV trough concentrations were independently associated with VF on LPV/r. Additional PI resistance mutations, including primary mutation I50V, could be selected in patients failing on LPV/r. Genotypic and pK parameters should be used to optimize the virological response to LPV/r in PI-experienced patients and to avoid further viral evolution.

We studied the impact of HIV-1 genetic diversity on antiretroviral susceptibility and the prevalence of primary HIV-1 resistance in a cohort of seroconverters in Abidjan. Despite an extensive variation in the protease and reverse transcriptase genes most of the isolates seemed to conserve a full susceptibility to antiretroviral drugs. Minor variations of nevirapine susceptibility should be investigated in a context of the potential wide use of this drug for preventing mother-to-child transmission. (author’s)

Although discontinuation of antiretroviral drug therapy is common, the impact on outcome in routine clinical practice is unknown. The Antiproteases Cohorte (APROCO) Cohort Study enrolled 1281 patients at the time they started a protease inhibitor (PI)-containing regimen from 1997 through 1999. After a median duration of follow-up of 20 months, 51% of patients had discontinued their initial PI. Prospectively recorded reasons for discontinuation were intolerance (52% of patients), poor adherence (22%), and failure of therapy (15%). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, only discontinuation due to poor adherence was associated with a lower frequency of human immunodeficiency virus RNA level in plasma of

Objectives To compare the frequency of previously in vitro-selected integrase mutations (T124A, T124A/S153F, S153Y, T124A/S153Y and L101I/T124A/S153Y) conferring resistance to S/GSK1349572 between HIV-1 subtype B integrase inhibitor (INI)-naive and raltegravir-treated patients. Methods Integrase sequences from 650 INI-naive patients and 84 raltegravir-treated patients were analysed. Results The T124A mutation alone and the combination T124A/L101I were more frequent in raltegravir-failing patients than in INI-naive patients (39.3% versus 24.5%, respectively, P = 0.005 for T124A and 20.2% versus 10.0%, respectively, P = 0.008 for T124A/L101I). The S153Y/F mutations were not detected in any integrase sequence (except for S153F alone, only detected in one INI-naive patient). Conclusions T124A and T124A/L101I, more frequent in raltegravir-treated patients, could have some effect on raltegravir response and their presence could play a role in the selection of other mutations conferring S/GSK1349572 resistance. The impact of raltegravir-mediated changes such as these on the virological response to S/GSK1349572 should be studied further.

A prospective study was set up to evaluate the emergence of HIV-1 resistance after a switch from an effective protease inhibitor (PI)-containing regimen to a multitherapy regimen including nevirapine (NVP). After 6 months with an undetectable viral load under a PI-containing regimen, the patients were switched to NVP with conservation of the associated nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NR- TIs). Patients were followed-up at 1 month and then every 3 months after switching therapy. Nucleotide sequence analysis of the pol gene was performed at the first points of virologic failure. Thirty-four patients were included. The NRTI-naive group (22 patients) had begun antiretroviral therapy with a PI-containing regimen, whereas 12 patients (experienced group) had been previously treated by nucleoside mono-and/or dual therapy. After a median follow-up of 40 weeks, no patient of the naive group, versus 41% of the experienced group, developed a virologic failure after the change toward NVP (p = .003). The virologic failures were associated with the appearance of NNRTI-resistant mutations. All rebound mutants also presented NRTI-resistance mutations. These results are consistent with a higher risk of virologic failure after a switch to an NNRTI in patients with prior suboptimal treatment and suggest the hypothesis that archived resistant viruses may facilitate the emergence of NNRTI resistance.

Predictors of virologic (plasma HIV RNA viral load [VL]500 copies/ml) and immunologic (rise in CD4+ cell count50 cells/mm3) response after 4 months of therapy (M4) were studied in 750 HIV-1-infected patients prospectively enrolled at the initiation of a protease inhibitor (PI)-containing regimen. A virologic response was observed in 80% of patients, and an immunologic response was observed in 64%. Sixty-two percent of patients self-reported full adherence to therapy at 1 month of therapy (M1) and M4. In multivariate analysis, a virologic response was more frequent in fully adherent patients (odds ratio [OR] = 2.0; p =.001). An immunologic response was associated with age36 years (OR =1.4; p =.03), baseline VL (OR = 1.5 per 1 log10 copies/ml higher; p.01), decrease in VL at M1 (OR = 1.5 per 1 log10 copies/ml decrease; p.01), baseline total lymphocyte count (OR = 1.7 per 50% lower; p.001), and baseline CD4+ cell percentageor = 20% (OR =1.9; p.001) but not with adherence to therapy. Full adherence seems to be a major predictor of a virologic response to PI-containing triple therapy. An immunologic response may be possible despite incomplete adherence, at least early in therapy.

A retrospective study was set up to investigate the frequency of zidovudine (ZDV)-resistant HIV-1 in infected newborns after ZDV prophylaxis in the French Perinatal Cohort study. Nucleotide sequence analysis was carried out from 34 infants' isolates and 18 maternal plasma samples. Mutations related to ZDV resistance were found in the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase in 7 of 34 children (20%). Evidence of mother-child transmission of ZDV-resistant HIV-1 was found in 4 cases. Phylogenetic analysis showed that 14 of 34 HIV-1 isolates from the infants belonged to non-B subtypes. The presence of ZDV resistance-encoding mutations in the newborn isolates was associated with a longer total duration of exposure to ZDV. In a context of a wide HIV-1 variability, ZDV resistance can be one of the factors contributing to mother-child transmission.

We used an allele-specific real-time PCR assay to explore the presence of K103N and M184V minority species among primary human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections and their potential influence in HIV transmission. Thirty randomly chosen antiretroviral drug-naive patients lacking both the K103N and the M184V mutations as determined by conventional sequencing methods were studied, and K103N and M184V viral minority species were found in three (10%) and four (11%) patients, respectively.

The open reading frames ORF 52, ORF 65, K12, and K8.1 of the human herpesvirus 8 (HHV8) were expressed as glutathione-S-transferase (GST) fusion proteins and analysed by Western blotting (WB) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The open reading frame (ORF) 65 and K8.1 antigens gave the highest reactivity (71%) in sera from HIV-dependent Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) patients. Therefore both antigens appear to be essential for HHV8 diagnostics, whereas ORF K12 and ORF 52 were of minor importance. Using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) out of the peripheral blood of these KS patients, 48% were detected as positive. By testing an N-terminal-deleted construct (amino acid 80–171) of ORF 65, we could show that the N-terminal region of this protein is essential to mediate full immunogenic reactivity. By analysing different deletion mutants of ORF K8.1, the major epitope was found to be located between aa 29 and 101. The prevalence of antibodies directed against the different antigens was determined for healthy blood donors to be 3–6%. The different antibody patterns obtained in HIV-patients with and without KS support the hypothesis that different antibody profiles develop during the course of KS.

Objective To study zidovudine resensitization and dual resistance to zidovudine/lamivudine in HIV-1 isolates from nucleoside reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitor-experienced patients during selective pressure exerted by zidovudine/lamivudine combination therapy. Design and methods HIV-1 isolates from 29 patients receiving zidovudine/lamivudine combination therapy in the Delta roll-over study were analysed at entry and during a 1 year follow-up period for phenotypic susceptibility to zidovudine and lamivudine in the ANRS PBMC assay. The RT gene from codon 20 to 230 and at codon 333 was analysed by nucleotide sequencing of the corresponding isolates. Results HIV-1 isolates from 23 of the 29 patients were phenotypically resistant to zidovudine at baseline; 61% of these patients showed significant zidovudine resensitization during follow-up. The zidovudine IC50 value correlated positively with log10 plasma HIV-1 RNA ( P=0.02) and negatively with the CD4 cell count ( P=0.004). Zidovudine resensitization (related to acquisition of the M184V mutation) was transient, with evolution towards dual resistance to zidovudine and lamivudine in 20 of the 29 patients. The phenotype of certain dually resistant isolates coincided with the emergence of multiple mutations in the 5’ part of the RT gene. Conclusions M184V-mediated zidovudine resensitization of HIV-1 is transient in most patients who are given zidovudine/lamivudine combination therapy when zidovudine resistance has already emerged. The subsequent evolution towards dual phenotypic resistance to zidovudine/lamivudine corresponds to complex genotypic profiles.

Thirteen laboratories participated in blind tests of a panel of 20 coded cerebrospinal fluid specimens (7 uninfected samples, 3 samples infected with 1 50% tissue culture infective dose [TCID50]/0.1 ml [nonenterovirus strains], and 10 samples infected with 10, 1, or 0.1 TCID50/0.1 ml [three different enterovirus serotypes]) on the Amplicor enterovirus PCR assay (Roche Diagnostic Systems). The panel was also evaluated by in-house PCR (two nested-PCR and three one-step PCR assay) or tissue culture (eight laboratories). The viral load was shown to influence greatly the sensitivity of the assay. The average sensitivity of the Amplicor test ranged from 67 to 98% for viral titers of 1 to 10 TCID50/0.1 ml, respectively; titers of 0.1 TCID50/0.1 ml resulted in a sensitivity of only 16%. The overall specificity of the Amplicor test was 98%. The Amplicor assay compared favorably to the five in-house PCR tests (no significant difference in either sensitivity or specificity) and was much more sensitive than tissue culture (P < 0.001), even for high viral loads. It was easy to perform, rapid (about 6 h), well-standardized, and appeared to be suitable for the diagnosis of enterovirus meningitis on a routine basis in laboratories trained in molecular biology techniques.

International audience; Objectives This observational study was requested by French health authorities to determine the impact of lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra®) on antiretroviral resistance in clinical practice. Virological failures of lopinavir/ritonavir and their effects on the resistance to protease inhibitors and reverse transcriptase inhibitors were evaluated in protease inhibitor-experienced patients.Patients and methods Virological failure was defined as an HIV-1 plasma viral load >50 copies/mL after at least 3 months of lopinavir/ritonavir-containing antiretroviral therapy. For all patients, a resistance genotypic test was available at failure and before lopinavir/ritonavir treatment. Data from 72 patients with inclusion criteria were studied. Results The mean viral load at baseline was 4 log10 copies/mL (1.6–6.5). Mutations in the protease gene significantly selected between baseline and failure were L10V, K20R, L33F, M36I, I47V, I54V, A71V and I85V (P < 0.05). Patients who had more than seven protease inhibitor mutations at baseline showed a significantly increased risk of occurrence of protease inhibitor mutations. The proportion of viruses susceptible to atazanavir, fosamprenavir and darunavir decreased significantly between baseline and failure (P < 0.05). Among patients with a virus susceptible to atazanavir at day 0, 26% (n = 14) exhibited a virus resistant or possibly resistant at the time of failure. This proportion was 32% (n = 16) for fosamprenavir and 16% (n = 7) for darunavir. Conclusions A darunavir-based regimen appears to be a sequential option in the case of lopinavir/ritonavir failure. To compare and determine the best treatment sequencing, similar studies should be performed for darunavir/ritonavir and atazanavir/ritonavir.