Pretreatment of muscles with ionising radiation enhances tissue formation by transplanted myoblasts but little is known about the effects on muscle function. We implanted myoblasts from an expanded, male-donor-derived, culture (i28) into X-ray irradiated (16 Gy) or irradiated and damaged soleus muscles of female syngeneic mice (Balb/c). Three to 6 months later the isometric contractile properties of the muscles were studied in vitro, and donor nuclei were visualised in muscle sections with a Y chromosome-specific DNA probe. Irradiated sham-injected muscles had smaller masses than untreated solei and produced less twitch and tetanic force (all by about 18 %). Injection of 106 myoblasts abolished these deficiencies and innervation appeared normal. Cryodamage of irradiated solei produced muscle remnants with few (1–50) or no fibres. Additional myoblast implantation led to formation of large muscles (25 % above normal) containing numerous small-diameter fibres. Upon direct electrical stimulation, these muscles produced considerable twitch (53 % of normal) and tetanic forces (35 % of normal) but innervation was insufficient as indicated by weak nerve-evoked contractions and elevated ACh sensitivity. In control experiments on irradiated muscles, reinnervation was found to be less complete after botulinum toxin paralysis than after nerve crush indicating that proliferative arrest of irradiated Schwann cells may account for the observed innervation deficits. Irradiation appears to be an effective pretreatment for improving myoblast transplantation. The injected cells can even produce organised contractile tissue replacing whole muscle. However, impaired nerve regeneration limits the functional performance of the new muscle. Transplantation of skeletal muscle precursor cells (myoblasts) has been performed in humans and animals to evaluate its potential as a therapy for hereditary muscle diseases (Partridge & Davies, 1995). Sufficient experimental data are now available to recognise problems specific to myoblast transplantations in addition to difficulties encountered with tissue transplantation such as initiation of immune responses or graft death (for reviews see Grounds, 1996; Tremblay & Guerette, 1997). One specific problem with myoblast transplantation is that the amount of donor-derived tissue appears to depend on the in vitro cultivation history of the implanted cells (Irintchev et al. 1997b). Non-cultivated muscle precursor cells of different species grafted as suspensions, muscle minces or slices produce abundant muscle tissue (Carlson, 1972; DiMario & Stockdale, 1995; Fan et al. 1996). However, cells from primary mouse cultures, similar to human or avian myoblasts propagated in vitro, generate little or no tissue in normal or dystrophic muscles (DiMario & Stockdale, 1995; Fan et al. 1996; Grounds, 1996; Tremblay & Guerette, 1997). Better results have been obtained with primary murine cultures expanded over several passages and highly enriched in myoblasts (Rando & Blau, 1994; Irintchev et al. 1997a). Finally, robust murine immortal lines form large amounts of contractile muscle but their use is limited by late neoplastic growth (Wernig et al. 1991; Wernig & Irintchev, 1995; Irintchev et al. 1998). Apart from intrinsic or acquired properties of the cells, myogenicity in vivo depends on the host environment. Myoblasts from immortal lines produced larger progeny in cryodamaged than in intact or paralysed muscles, which led to a larger increase in contractile strength (Wernig et al. 1991). Intact muscles of normal mice appear to be a poor environment also for myoblasts from expanded primary cultures; only few donor cells survived for 1–4 months and muscle contractile properties did not improve (Irintchev et al. 1997a). However, when host muscles were damaged immediately before cell implantation, larger amounts of donor-derived tissue formed in direct correlation with the degree of damage inflicted (Irintchev et al. 1997a). Finally, myoblasts from the same cultures formed abundant and well-organised muscle tissue in the subcutaneous space (Irintchev et al. 1998). These findings indicate that new tissue formation is regulated by trophic and/or inhibitory factors in the host environment. Modulation of the host environment by ionising pre-irradiation, which disables the proliferative potential of resident satellite cells, has been found to be an effective pretreatment for myoblast transplantation (Morgan et al. 1990, 1993; Huard et al. 1994; Kinoshita et al. 1994). However, only one study documents positive functional effects (Alameddine et al. 1994). In the present study, irradiation was applied before myoblast transplantation into undamaged or cryodamaged muscles resulting in enhanced – to varying degrees – formation of mature donor tissue in both models. However, it was also observed that after cryodamage the innervation of newly formed muscle was insufficient. Therefore, in order to elucidate the effects of irradiation on nerve regeneration additional experiments were performed i which muscle tissue and blood supply were left intact, but the innervation was blocked either by nerve crush or botulinum toxin. It has already been shown that X-ray irradiation hinders muscle reinnervation after toxin treatment but not after nerve crush (Gomez et al. 1982; Gomez & Love, 1984). Thus, if irradiation arrests Schwann cell proliferation, reinnervation after nerve crush should be less affected than toxin-induced sprouting, since in the former case axons grow into the old endoneurial tubes and no significant Schwann cell proliferation is needed. The results have been published in part as an abstract (Wernig et al. 1999).