251. Mathematical models integrating an ultrasound-based technology improve the diagnosis of ovarian cancer
- Author
-
UCL - SSS/IREC/EPID - Pôle d'épidémiologie et biostatistique, Robert, Annie, Lison, Dominique, Berlière, Martine, Closon, Marie-Christine, Legrand, Catherine, Menon, Usha, Nir, Dror, Van Eycken, Elizabeth, Vaes, Evelien, UCL - SSS/IREC/EPID - Pôle d'épidémiologie et biostatistique, Robert, Annie, Lison, Dominique, Berlière, Martine, Closon, Marie-Christine, Legrand, Catherine, Menon, Usha, Nir, Dror, Van Eycken, Elizabeth, and Vaes, Evelien
- Abstract
In the European countries, age standardized incidence rates (European standard) for ovarian cancer vary between 7.2 and 19.3/100,000 while mortality rates are ranging between 2.8 and 12.2/100,000.1 In Belgium, ovarian cancer is not as frequent as breast cancer since breast cancer presents with very high incidence rates (similar for other European countries). However, age standardized breast cancer mortality rates in 2008 were less than one fourth of the age standardized incidence rates whereas for ovarian cancer, mortality rates were two thirds of the incidence rates (see figure 1). And, unlike for breast cancer, mortality rates for ovarian cancer were not decreasing over the past years.2 Indeed, ovarian cancer is one of the leading causes of death from gynaecological malignancies.3 This is explained by the fact that in general, ovarian cancer is detected at too advanced stages. Early diagnosis of ovarian cancer is thus the key for improving outcomes for the disease. Medical imaging techniques have revolutionised medicine during the last decades. Ultrasound (US) in particular gives access to vital data in a non-invasive way and is effective for imaging soft tissues of the body. Compared to other medical imaging modalities, US has the following positive attributes: • US is a real-time, easy operation medical imaging technique • US has a non-invasive and radiation free nature • US is relatively low-priced, Hence US has become widely used as a diagnostic technique in general clinical practice. In gynaecology, US is one of the most important and primary diagnostic tools. Its use continues to increase and it is now an essential part of the diagnostic procedure in examining the female pelvis. Indeed, the use of US morphology to characterize adnexal masses and thus diagnose ovarian cancer is well established.4 As a part of patient management, gynaecologists use US morphology to differentiate between malignant and non-malignant ovarian masses that come to their attention. I, (MED 3) -- UCL, 2011
- Published
- 2011