151. The gender productivity gap in Biochemical and Biophysical sciences. Some evidence to solve the productivity puzzle.
- Author
-
Barletta, Florencia, Fiorentin, Florencia, Molina, Fernando, and Suarez, Diana
- Subjects
- *
GENDER inequality , *PUBLIC sphere , *RESEARCH personnel , *HOUSEKEEPING , *EMPLOYEE seniority - Abstract
This paper studies the gender productivity gap in biochemical and biophysical sciences in Argentina for the period 2011–2018. Women publish less papers than men due to academic and non-academic differences. We define the former as the individual characteristics related to research activity, that are developed in the public sphere, and non-academic as the ones related to the private sphere (such as housework and breeding). The later tend to negatively impact on the academic characteristics of female researchers, even when they are not supposed to be related. We test whether the gender productivity gap persists even when academic characteristics between men and women are alike, and to what extent these characteristics contribute to reduce the gap. The methodological approached is based on an extension of the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition, named multivariate decomposition for nonlinear response models. Results show that both observable (academic) and unobservable factors (both academic and non-academic) explain the gender productivity gap and that the former contribute to the reduction but not the elimination. • Gender productivity gap in biochemical and biophysical sciences is studied. • Women publish between 0.39 and 0.34 fewer papers than men per year. • Women publish less papers than men due to academic and non-academic differences. • Differences in tenure, age and seniority explain 75 % of the productivity gap. • There is a 25 % of the gap that remains unexplained (equal academic profiles). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF