Search

In this review, we highlight the evolution of our knowledge about the way Mg2+ participates in the activation of heterotrimeric G proteins, beginning with its requirement in hormonal stimulation of fat cell adenylyl cyclase (1969) and ending with knowledge that incorporates information obtained from site directed mutagenesis and examination of the crystal structures of G proteins (2010). Our current view is that, as it seeks to fill its octahedral coordination shell, Mg acts as a keystone locking the G protein-α subunits into a conformation in which Gα dissociates from the Gβγ dimer, is competent in regulating effectors, and acquires GTPase activity. The latter is the result of moving the backbone carbonyl group of the Mg-coordinating threonine into a location in space that positions the hydrolytic water so as to facilitate the water's nucleophilic attack that leads to hydrolysis of the link between the β and γ phosphates of guanosine triphosphate (GTP). The role of the backbone carbonyl group of the Mg-coordinating threonine is equi-hierarchical with a similar and long-recognized role of the Switch II glutamine δ amide carbonyl group. Disruption of either leads to loss of GTPase activity. Fil: Birnbaumer, Lutz. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina. Public Healt Service. National Institute Of Health. Laboratorio Of Developmental Neurobiology; Estados Unidos Fil: Zurita, Adolfo Ramón. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina. Public Healt Service. National Institute Of Health. Laboratorio Of Developmental Neurobiology; Estados Unidos

Following stimulation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) at the cell surface, heterotrimeric G proteins are activated. Both Galpha and Gbetagamma subunits regulate specific effectors to transmit signals received by the receptor. Recent data suggest potential nuclear localization or translocation of the Gbetagamma subunit. Here, we show that co-expression of the Gbetagamma dimer decreased phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA)-stimulated AP-1 gene reporter activity in HEK293 cells as well as the AP-1 dependent gonadotropin-releasing hormone-stimulated human follicle-stimulating hormone beta reporter activity in LbetaT2 gonadotrope cells. Further, we identify Fos transcription factors as novel interactors of the Gbeta1 subunit, using protein fragment complementation assays, as well as co-immunoprecipitation in vivo and in vitro. Fos proteins dimerize with Jun proteins to form activator protein-1 (AP-1) transcription factor complexes, which regulate target gene expression. Gbetagamma did not interfere with the dimerization of Fos and Jun or their ability to bind DNA. Rather, Gbetagamma co-localized with the AP-1 complex in the nucleus and recruited histone deacetylases (HDACs) to inhibit AP-1 transcriptional activity. Our data indicate a novel role for Gbetagamma subunits as transcriptional regulators.

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins act to temporally modulate the activity of G protein subunits after G protein-coupled receptor activation. RGS proteins exert their effect by directly binding to the activated Galpha subunit of the G protein, catalyzing the accelerated hydrolysis of GTP and returning the G protein to its inactive, heterotrimeric form. In previous studies, we have sought to inhibit this GTPase-accelerating protein activity of the RGS protein by using small molecules. In this study, we investigated the mechanism of CCG-4986 [methyl-N-[(4-chlorophenyl)sulfonyl]-4-nitro-benzenesulfinimidoate], a previously reported small-molecule RGS inhibitor. Here, we find that CCG-4986 inhibits RGS4 function through the covalent modification of two spatially distinct cysteine residues on RGS4. We confirm that modification of Cys132, located near the RGS/Galpha interaction surface, modestly inhibits Galpha binding and GTPase acceleration. In addition, we report that modification of Cys148, a residue located on the opposite face of RGS4, can disrupt RGS/Galpha interaction through an allosteric mechanism that almost completely inhibits the Galpha-RGS protein-protein interaction. These findings demonstrate three important points: 1) the modification of the Cys148 allosteric site results in significant changes to the RGS interaction surface with Galpha; 2) this identifies a "hot spot" on RGS4 for binding of small molecules and triggering an allosteric change that may be significantly more effective than targeting the actual protein-protein interaction surface; and 3) because of the modification of a positional equivalent of Cys148 in RGS8 by CCG-4986, lack of inhibition indicates that RGS proteins exhibit fundamental differences in their responses to small-molecule ligands.

The interaction of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) with heterotrimeric G proteins represents one of the most fundamental biological processes. However, the molecular architecture of the GPCR-G protein complex remains poorly defined. In the present study, we applied a comprehensive GPCR-G protein alpha subunit (Galpha) chemical cross-linking strategy to map a receptor-Galpha interface, both before and after agonist-induced receptor activation. Using the M(3) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (M3R)-Galpha(q) system as a model system, we examined the ability of approximately 250 combinations of cysteine-substituted M3R and Galpha(q) proteins to undergo cross-link formation. We identified many specific M3R-Galpha(q) contact sites, in both the inactive and active receptor conformations, allowing us to draw conclusions regarding the basic architecture of the M3R-Galpha(q) interface and the nature of the conformational changes following receptor activation. As heterotrimeric G proteins as well as most GPCRs share a high degree of structural homology, our findings should be of broad general relevance.

Activation of GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors) leads to conformational changes that ultimately initiate signal transduction. Activated GPCRs transiently combine with and activate heterotrimeric G-proteins resulting in GTP replacement of GDP on the G-protein α subunit. Both the detailed structural changes essential for productive GDP/GTP exchange on the G-protein α subunit and the structure of the GPCR–G-protein complex itself have yet to be elucidated. Nevertheless, transient GPCR–G-protein complexes can be trapped by nucleotide depletion, yielding an empty-nucleotide G-protein–GPCR complex that can be isolated. Whereas early biochemical studies indicated formation of a complex between G-protein and activated receptor only, more recent results suggest that G-protein can bind to pre-activated states of receptor or even couple transiently to non-activated receptor to facilitate rapid responses to stimuli. Efficient and reproducible formation of physiologically relevant, conformationally homogenous GPCR–G-protein complexes is a prerequisite for structural studies designed to address these possibilities.

Active G protein-coupled receptors activate heterotrimeric Gαβγ proteins by catalyzing the exchange of GDP by GTP at the Gα subunit. A paradoxical attenuation of G protein-activated inwardly rectifying potassium channels (GIRK) upon stimulation of native cells with high concentrations of agonist is known. However, a deactivation of activated G proteins by active receptors has not been experimentally studied in intact cells. We monitored GIRK currents and Go protein activation by means of fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) in parallel. The results suggested that GIRK currents were paradoxically attenuated due to an inactivation of Go proteins by active α2A-adrenergic receptors. To study the mechanisms, G protein activation and receptor-G protein interactions were analyzed as a function of nucleotide type and nucleotide concentrations by means of FRET, while controlling intracellular nucleotides upon permeabilization of the cell membrane. Results suggested a receptor-catalyzed dissociation of GTP from activated heterotrimeric Gαβγ. Consequently, nucleotide-free G proteins were sequestrated in heterotrimeric conformation at the active receptor, thus attenuating downstream signaling in an agonist-dependent manner.

Heterotrimeric G proteins are well known for their roles in signal transduction downstream of G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs), and both Gα subunits and tightly associated Gβγ subunits regulate downstream effector molecules. Compared to Gα subunits, the physiological roles of individual Gβ and Gγ subunits are poorly understood. In this study, we generated mice deficient in the Gβ1 gene and found that Gβ1 is required for neural tube closure, neural progenitor cell proliferation, and neonatal development. About 40% Gβ1−/− embryos developed neural tube defects (NTDs) and abnormal actin organization was observed in the basal side of neuroepithelium. In addition, Gβ1−/− embryos without NTDs showed microencephaly and died within 2 days after birth. GPCR agonist-induced ERK phosphorylation, cell proliferation, and cell spreading, which were all found to be regulated by Gαi and Gβγ signaling, were abnormal in Gβ1−/− neural progenitor cells. These data indicate that Gβ1 is required for normal embryonic neurogenesis. Developmental Dynamics 239:1089–1101, 2010. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The activation of several G protein-coupled receptors is known to regulate the adhesive properties of cells in different contexts. Here, we reveal that Gbetagamma subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins regulate cell-matrix adhesiveness by activating Rap1a-dependent inside-out signals and integrin activation. We show that Gbetagamma subunits enter in a protein complex with activated Rap1a and its effector Radil and establish that this complex is required downstream of receptor stimulation for the activation of integrins and the positive modulation of cell-matrix adhesiveness. Moreover, we demonstrate that Gbetagamma and activated Rap1a promote the translocation of Radil to the plasma membrane at sites of cell-matrix contacts. These results add to the molecular understanding of how G protein-coupled receptors impinge on cell adhesion and suggest that the Gbetagamma x Rap1 x Radil complex plays important roles in this process.

Stable complexes among G proteins and effectors are an emerging concept in cell signaling. The prototypical Gβγ effector G protein-activated K+ channel (GIRK; Kir3) physically interacts with Gβγ but also with Gαi/o. Whether and how Gαi/o subunits regulate GIRK in vivo is unclear. We studied triple interactions among GIRK subunits 1 and 2, Gαi3 and Gβγ. We used in vitro protein interaction assays and in vivo intramolecular Forster resonance energy transfer (i-FRET) between fluorophores attached to N and C termini of either GIRK1 or GIRK2 subunit. We demonstrate, for the first time, that Gβγ and Gαi3 distinctly and interdependently alter the conformational states of the heterotetrameric GIRK1/2 channel. Biochemical experiments show that Gβγ greatly enhances the binding of GIRK1 subunit to Gαi3GDP and, unexpectedly, to Gαi3GTP. i-FRET showed that both Gαi3 and Gβγ induced distinct conformational changes in GIRK1 and GIRK2. Moreover, GIRK1 and GIRK2 subunits assumed unique, distinct conformations when coexpressed with a “constitutively active” Gαi3 mutant and Gβγ together. These conformations differ from those assumed by GIRK1 or GIRK2 after separate coexpression of either Gαi3 or Gβγ. Both biochemical and i-FRET data suggest that GIRK acts as the nucleator of the GIRK-Gα-Gβγ signaling complex and mediates allosteric interactions between GαiGTP and Gβγ. Our findings imply that Gαi/o and the Gαiβγ heterotrimer can regulate a Gβγ effector both before and after activation by neurotransmitters.

Heptahelical G-protein (heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding protein)-coupled receptors couple to heterotrimeric G proteins to relay extracellular signals to intracellular signaling networks, but the molecular mechanism underlying guanosine 5'-diphosphate (GDP) release by the G protein alpha-subunit is not well understood. Amino acid substitutions in the conserved alpha5 helix of G(i), which extends from the C-terminal region to the nucleotide-binding pocket, cause dramatic increases in basal (receptor-independent) GDP release rates. For example, mutant Galpha(i1)-T329A shows an 18-fold increase in basal GDP release rate and, when expressed in culture, it causes a significant decrease in forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation. The crystal structure of Galpha(i1)-T329A.GDP shows substantial conformational rearrangement of the switch I region and additional striking alterations of side chains lining the catalytic pocket that disrupt the Mg(+2) coordination sphere and dislodge bound Mg(+2). We propose a "sequential release" mechanism whereby a transient conformational change in the alpha5 helix alters switch I to induce GDP release. Interestingly, this mechanistic model for heterotrimeric G protein activation is similar to that suggested for the activation of the plant small G protein Rop4 by RopGEF8.

Activation of certain classes of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can lead to alterations in the actin cytoskeleton, gene transcription, cell transformation, and other processes that are known to be regulated by Rho family small-molecular-weight GTPases. Although these responses can occur indirectly via cross-talk from canonical heterotrimeric G protein cascades, it has recently been demonstrated that Dbl family Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factors (RhoGEFs) can serve as the direct downstream effectors of heterotrimeric G proteins. Heterotrimeric Galpha(12/13), Galpha(q), and Gbetagamma subunits are each now known to directly bind and regulate RhoGEFs. Atomic structures have recently been determined for several of these RhoGEFs and their G protein complexes, providing fresh insight into the molecular mechanisms of signal transduction between GPCRs and small molecular weight G proteins. This review covers what is currently known about the structure, function, and regulation of these recently recognized effectors of heterotrimeric G proteins.

Heterotrimeric G proteins (Galpha, Gbeta/Ggamma subunits) constitute one of the most important components of cell signaling cascade. G Protein Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) perceive many extracellular signals and transduce them to heterotrimeric G proteins, which further transduce these signals intracellular to appropriate downstream effectors and thereby play an important role in various signaling pathways. GPCRs exist as a superfamily of integral membrane protein receptors that contain seven transmembrane alpha-helical regions, which bind to a wide range of ligands. Upon activation by a ligand, the GPCR undergoes a conformational change and then activate the G proteins by promoting the exchange of GDP/GTP associated with the Galpha subunit. This leads to the dissociation of Gbeta/Ggamma dimer from Galpha. Both these moieties then become free to act upon their downstream effectors and thereby initiate unique intracellular signaling responses. After the signal propagation, the GTP of Galpha-GTP is hydrolyzed to GDP and Galpha becomes inactive (Galpha-GDP), which leads to its re-association with the Gbeta/Ggamma dimer to form the inactive heterotrimeric complex. The GPCR can also transduce the signal through G protein independent pathway. GPCRs also regulate cell cycle progression. Till to date thousands of GPCRs are known from animal kingdom with little homology among them, but only single GPCR has been identified in plant system. The Arabidopsis GPCR was reported to be cell cycle regulated and also involved in ABA and in stress signaling. Here I have described a general mechanism of signal transduction through GPCR/G proteins, structure of GPCRs, family of GPCRs and plant GPCR and its role.

According to accepted doctrine, agonist-bound G protein-coupled receptors catalyze the exchange of GDP for GTP and facilitate the dissociation of Galpha and Gbetagamma, which in turn regulate their respective effectors. More recently, the existence of preformed signaling complexes, which may include receptors, heterotrimeric G proteins, and/or effectors, is gaining acceptance. We show herein the existence of a preformed complex of inactive heterotrimer (Galpha(s) x betagamma) and the effector type 5 adenylyl cyclase (AC5), localized by the N terminus of AC5. GST fusions of AC5 N terminus (5NT) bind to purified G protein subunits (GDP-Galpha(s) and Gbetagamma) with apparent affinities of 270 +/- 21 and 190 +/- 7 nM, respectively. GDP-bound Galpha(s) and Gbetagamma did not compete, but rather facilitated their interaction with 5NT, consistent with the isolation of a ternary complex (5NT, Galpha(s), and Gbetagamma) by gel filtration. The AC5/Gbetagamma interaction was also demonstrated by immunoprecipitation and fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) and the binding site of heterotrimer Galpha(s) x betagamma mapped to amino acids 60 to 129 of 5NT. Deletion of this region in full-length AC5 resulted in significant reduction of FRET between Gbetagamma and AC. 5NT also interacts with the catalytic core of AC, mainly via the C1 domain, to enhance Galpha(s)--and forskolin-stimulated activity of C1/C2 domains. The N terminus also serves to constrain Galpha(i)-mediated inhibition of AC5, which is relieved in the presence of Gbetagamma. These results reveal that 5NT plays a key regulatory role by interacting with the catalytic core and scaffolding inactive heterotrimeric G proteins, forming a preassembled complex that is potentially braced for GPCR activation.

G protein-coupled receptors mediate cellular responses to a wide variety of stimuli, including taste, light, and neurotransmitters. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, activation of the pheromone pathway triggers events leading to mating. The view had long been held that the G protein-mediated signal occurs principally at the plasma membrane. Recently, it has been shown that the G protein alpha subunit Gpa1 can promote signaling at endosomes and requires two components of the sole phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase in yeast, Vps15 and Vps34. Vps15 contains multiple WD repeats and also binds to Gpa1 preferentially in the GDP-bound state; these observations led us to hypothesize that Vps15 may function as a G protein beta subunit at the endosome. Here we show an X-ray crystal structure of the Vps15 WD domain that reveals a seven-bladed propeller resembling that of typical Gbeta subunits. We show further that the WD domain is sufficient to bind Gpa1 as well as to Atg14, a potential Ggamma protein that exists in a complex with Vps15. The Vps15 kinase domain together with the intermediate domain (linking the kinase and WD domains) also contributes to Gpa1 binding and is necessary for Vps15 to sustain G protein signaling. These findings reveal that the Vps15 Gbeta-like domain serves as a scaffold to assemble Gpa1 and Atg14, whereas the kinase and intermediate domains are required for proper signaling at the endosome.

The G protein betagamma subunit dimer (Gbetagamma) and the Gbeta5/regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) dimer play fundamental roles in propagating and regulating G protein pathways, respectively. How these complexes form dimers when the individual subunits are unstable is a question that has remained unaddressed for many years. In the case of Gbetagamma, recent studies have shown that phosducin-like protein 1 (PhLP1) works as a co-chaperone with the cytosolic chaperonin complex (CCT) to fold Gbeta and mediate its interaction with Ggamma. However, it is not known what fraction of the many Gbetagamma combinations is assembled this way or whether chaperones influence the specificity of Gbetagamma dimer formation. Moreover, the mechanism of Gbeta5-RGS assembly has yet to be assessed experimentally. The current study was undertaken to directly address these issues. The data show that PhLP1 plays a vital role in the assembly of Ggamma2 with all four Gbeta1-4 subunits and in the assembly of Gbeta2 with all twelve Ggamma subunits, without affecting the specificity of the Gbetagamma interactions. The results also show that Gbeta5-RGS7 assembly is dependent on CCT and PhLP1, but the apparent mechanism is different from that of Gbetagamma. PhLP1 seems to stabilize the interaction of Gbeta5 with CCT until Gbeta5 is folded, after which it is released to allow Gbeta5 to interact with RGS7. These findings point to a general role for PhLP1 in the assembly of all Gbetagamma combinations and suggest a CCT-dependent mechanism for Gbeta5-RGS7 assembly that utilizes the co-chaperone activity of PhLP1 in a unique way.

Heterotrimeric G proteins (alphabetagamma) and Ras proteins are activated by cell-surface receptors that sense extracellular signals. Both sets of proteins were traditionally thought to be constrained to the plasma membrane and some intracellular membranes. Live-cell-imaging experiments have now shown that these proteins are mobile inside a cell, shuttling continually between the plasma membrane and intracellular membranes in the basal state, maintaining these proteins in dynamic equilibrium in different membrane compartments. Furthermore, on receptor activation, a family of G protein betagamma subunits translocates rapidly and reversibly to the Golgi and endoplasmic reticulum enabling direct communication between the extracellular signal and intracellular membranes. A member of the Ras family has similarly been shown to translocate on activation. Although the impact of this unexpected intracellular movement of signaling proteins on cell physiology is likely to be distinct, there are striking similarities in the properties of these two families of signal-transducing proteins.

It is well known that Gαi1(GDP) binds strongly to Gβγ subunits to form the Gαi1(GDP)-Gβγ heterotrimer, and that activation to Gαi1(GTP) results in conformational changes that reduces its affinity for Gβγ subunits. Previous studies of G protein subunit interactions have used stoichiometric amounts of the proteins. Here, we have found that Gαi1(GDP) can bind a second Gβγ subunit with an affinity only 10-fold weaker than the primary site and close to the affinity between activated Gαi1 and Gβγ subunits. Also, we find that phospholipase Cβ2, an effector of Gβγ, does not compete with the second binding site implying that effectors can be bound to the Gαi1(GDP)-(Gβγ)2 complex. Biophysical measurements and molecular docking studies suggest that this second site is distant from the primary one. A synthetic peptide having a sequence identical to the putative second binding site on Gαi1 competes with binding of the second Gβγ subunit. Injection of this peptide into cultured cells expressing eYFP-Gαi1(GDP) and eCFP-Gβγ reduces the overall association of the subunits suggesting this site is operative in cells. We propose that this second binding site serves to promote and stabilize G protein subunit interactions in the presence of competing cellular proteins.

Many biochemical pathways are driven by G protein-coupled receptors, cell surface proteins that convert the binding of extracellular chemical, sensory, and mechanical stimuli into cellular signals. Their interaction with various ligands triggers receptor activation that typically couples to and activates heterotrimeric G proteins, which in turn control the propagation of secondary messenger molecules (e.g. cAMP) involved in critically important physiological processes (e.g. heart beat). Successful transfer of information from ligand binding events to intracellular signaling cascades involves a dynamic interplay between ligands, receptors, and G proteins. The development of Förster resonance energy transfer and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer-based methods has now permitted the kinetic analysis of initial steps involved in G protein-coupled receptor-mediated signaling in live cells and in systems as diverse as neurotransmitter and hormone signaling. The direct measurement of ligand efficacy at the level of the receptor by Förster resonance energy transfer is also now possible and allows intrinsic efficacies of clinical drugs to be linked with the effect of receptor polymorphisms.

Activation of heterotrimeric G proteins is generally believed to induce dissociation of Galpha and Gbetagamma subunits, which are then free to bind to and change the catalytic activity of a variety of intracellular enzymes. We have previously found that in cells, Galphaq subunits remain complexed with its major effector, phospholipase Cbeta1, through the activation cycle. To determine whether this behavior may be operative in other systems, we carried out Förster resonance energy transfer studies and found that eYFP-Galphai and eCFP-Gbetagamma remain associated after stimulation in HEK293 cells. We also found that the level of Forster resonance energy transfer between Alexa546-phospholipase Cbeta2 and eGFP-Gbetagamma is significant and unchanged upon activation in HEK293 cells, thus showing that these proteins can localize into stable signaling complexes. To understand the basis for this stabilization, we carried out in vitro studies using a series of single-Cys mutants labeled with fluorescence tags and monitored their interaction with Gbetagamma subunits and changes in their fluorescence properties and accessibility upon activation and Gbetagamma binding. Our studies suggest a significant change in the orientation between G protein subunits upon activation that allows the G proteins to remain complexed while activating effectors.

The role of Gbetagamma subunits in cellular signaling has become well established in the past 20 years. Not only do they regulate effectors once thought to be the sole targets of Galpha subunits, but it has become clear that they also have a unique set of binding partners and regulate signaling pathways that are not always localized to the plasma membrane. However, this may be only the beginning of the story. Gbetagamma subunits interact with G protein-coupled receptors, Galpha subunits, and several different effector molecules during assembly and trafficking of receptor-based signaling complexes and not simply in response to ligand stimulation at sites of receptor cellular activity. Gbetagamma assembly itself seems to be tightly regulated via the action of molecular chaperones and in turn may serve a similar role in the assembly of specific signaling complexes. We propose that specific Gbetagamma subunits have a broader role in controlling the architecture, assembly, and activity of cellular signaling pathways.

Many neurotransmitters activate G-protein-gated inwardly rectifying K+ (Kir3) channels by stimulating G-protein-coupled receptors. However, in native systems, only receptors coupled to pertussis-toxin (PTX)-sensitive G proteins (Gi/Go) have been shown to be able to activate Kir3 channels through the βγ subunits of G proteins (Gβγ), whereas activation of receptors coupled to PTX-insensitive G proteins such as Gq or Gs do not activate Kir3 channels. The question remains as to how signaling specificity is achieved and what are its key determinants. In this study, we have used the Xenopus oocyte expression system to investigate specific activation of Kir3 channels by heterotrimeric G proteins. We have demonstrated the activation of Kir3.4 channels by agonist stimulation of non-PTX-sensitive G proteins under conditions of Gα subunit overexpression. We present evidence to suggest a key role for the coupling efficiency of Gα subunits in determining the specificity of Gβγ signaling to the channel.

beta-Arrestins are known to regulate G-protein signalling through interactions with their downstream effectors. In the present study, we report that beta-arrestin1 associates with the G-protein beta1gamma2 subunits in transfected cells, and purified beta-arrestin1 interacts with G(beta1gamma2) derived from in vitro translation. Deletion mutagenesis of beta-arrestin1 led to the identification of a region, comprising amino acids 181-280, as being responsible for its interaction with G(beta1gamma2). Overexpression of beta-arrestin1 facilitates G(beta1gamma2)-mediated Akt phosphorylation, and inhibition of endogenous beta-arrestin1 expression by siRNA (small interfering RNA) diminishes this effect. Through investigation of NF-kappaB (nuclear factor kappaB), a transcription factor regulated by Akt signalling, we have found that overexpression of beta-arrestin1 significantly enhances G(beta1gamma2)-mediated nuclear translocation of NF-kappaB proteins and expression of a NF-kappaB-directed luciferase reporter. Overexpression of beta-arrestin1 also promotes bradykinin-induced, G(betagamma)-mediated NF-kappaB luciferase-reporter expression, which is reverted by silencing the endogenous beta-arrestin1 with a specific siRNA. These results identify novel functions of beta-arrestin1 in binding to the beta1gamma2 subunits of heterotrimeric G-proteins and promoting G(betagamma)-mediated Akt signalling for NF-kappaB activation.

A pheromone-mediated signaling pathway that couples seven-transmembrane-domain (7-TMD) receptors to a mitogen-activated protein kinase module controls Candida albicans mating. 7-TMD receptors are typically connected to heterotrimeric G proteins whose activation regulates downstream effectors. Two Gα subunits in C. albicans have been identified previously, both of which have been implicated in aspects of pheromone response. Cag1p was found to complement the mating pathway function of the pheromone receptor-coupled Gα subunit in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , and Gpa2p was shown to have a role in the regulation of cyclic AMP signaling in C. albicans and to repress pheromone-mediated arrest. Here, we show that the disruption of CAG1 prevented mating, inactivated pheromone-mediated arrest and morphological changes, and blocked pheromone-mediated gene expression changes in opaque cells of C. albicans and that the overproduction of CAG1 suppressed the hyperactive cell cycle arrest exhibited by sst2 mutant cells. Because the disruption of the STE4 homolog constituting the only C. albicans gene for a heterotrimeric Gβ subunit also blocked mating and pheromone response, it appears that in this fungal pathogen the Gα and Gβ subunits do not act antagonistically but, instead, are both required for the transmission of the mating signal.

Microtubule pulling forces that govern mitotic spindle movement of chromosomes are tightly regulated by G-proteins. A host of proteins, including Galpha subunits, Ric-8, AGS3, regulators of G-protein signalings, and scaffolding proteins, coordinate this vital cellular process. Ric-8A, acting as a guanine nucleotide exchange factor, catalyzes the release of GDP from various Galpha.GDP subunits and forms a stable nucleotide-free Ric-8A:Galpha complex. AGS3, a guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor (GDI), binds and stabilizes Galpha subunits in their GDP-bound state. Because Ric-8A and AGS3 may recognize and compete for Galpha.GDP in this pathway, we probed the interactions of a truncated AGS3 (AGS3-C; containing only the residues responsible for GDI activity), with Ric-8A:Galpha(il) and that of Ric-8A with the AGS3-C:Galpha(il).GDP complex. Pulldown assays, gel filtration, isothermal titration calorimetry, and rapid mixing stopped-flow fluorescence spectroscopy indicate that Ric-8A catalyzes the rapid release of GDP from AGS3-C:Galpha(i1).GDP. Thus, Ric-8A forms a transient ternary complex with AGS3-C:Galpha(i1).GDP. Subsequent dissociation of AGS3-C and GDP from Galpha(i1) yields a stable nucleotide free Ric-8A.Galpha(i1) complex that, in the presence of GTP, dissociates to yield Ric-8A and Galpha(i1).GTP. AGS3-C does not induce dissociation of the Ric-8A.Galpha(i1) complex, even when present at very high concentrations. The action of Ric-8A on AGS3:Galpha(i1).GDP ensures unidirectional activation of Galpha subunits that cannot be reversed by AGS3.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are involved in the control of virtually all aspects of our behavior and physiology. Activated receptors catalyze nucleotide exchange in heterotrimeric G proteins (composed of alpha.GDP, beta and gamma subunits) on the inner surface of the cell membrane. The GPCR rhodopsin and the G protein transducin (G(t)) are key proteins in the early steps of the visual cascade. The main receptor interaction sites on G(t) are the C-terminal tail of the G(t)alpha-subunit and the farnesylated C-terminal tail of the G(t)gamma-subunit. Synthetic peptides derived from these C-termini specifically bind and stabilize the active rhodopsin conformation (R*). Here we report the synthesis of R*-interacting peptides containing photo-reactive groups with a specific isotope pattern, which can facilitate detection of cross-linked products by mass spectrometry. In a preliminary set of experiments, we characterized such peptides derived from the farnesylated G(t)gamma C-terminus (G(t)gamma(60-71)far) in terms of their capability to bind R*. Here, we describe novel peptides with photo-affinity labels that bind R* with affinities similar to that of the native G(t)gamma(60-71)far peptide. Such peptides will enable an improved experimental strategy to probe rhodopsin-G(t) interaction and to map so far unknown interaction sites between both proteins.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) interact directly with heterotrimeric G proteins to transduce physiological signals. Early studies of this interaction concluded that GPCRs (R) and G proteins (G) collide with each other randomly after receptor activation and that R-G complexes are transient. More recent studies have suggested that inactive R and G are preassembled (precoupled) as stable R-G complexes. Here we examine the stability of complexes formed between cyan fluorescent protein-labeled α2A-adrenoreceptors (C-α2ARs) and G proteins in cells using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP). Labeled G proteins diffused in the plasma membrane with equal mobility in the absence and presence of immobile C-α2ARs. Immobile C-α2ARs activated labeled G proteins, demonstrating functional coupling without stable physical association. In contrast, a stable R-G interaction was detected when G proteins were deprived of nucleotides and C-α2ARs were active, as predicted by the ternary complex model. Overexpression of regulator of G protein signaling 4 (RGS4) accelerated the onset of effector activation but did not detectably alter the interaction between C-α2ARs and G proteins. We conclude that at most a small fraction of C-α2ARs and G proteins exist as R-G complexes at any moment.—Qin, K., Sethi, P. R., Lambert, N. A. Abundance and stability of complexes containing inactive G protein-coupled receptors and G proteins.

Heterotrimeric G proteins are comprised of a guanine nucleotide binding Galpha subunit and the Gbetagamma dimers that link G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to effectors. This study focuses on the expression and localization patterns for certain Gbeta and Ggamma subunits in neonatal and adult cardiomyocytes. We identify developmental downregulation of Gbeta1, Gbeta2, and Ggamma2, and a switch in the molecular form of Ggamma3, in cardiomyocytes. Gbeta1 is highly localized to caveolae membranes, whereas Gbeta2 is identified in caveolae and other membrane fractions. Gbeta3 is not detected in neonatal cardiomyocytes, but rather Gbeta3 is upregulated in adult cardiomyocytes and detected in the caveolae and soluble fractions. The observation that cardiomyocytes co-express multiple Gbeta and Ggamma subunits in a developmentally regulated manner, and that these Gbeta and Ggamma subunits assume distinct subcellular localization patterns, provides for a high level of signaling specificity in the heart.

Guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins) are an essential component in G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) mediated signaling. They are stimulated by a ligand-induced conformational change in the receptor, which catalyzes the exchange of GDP, bound to the ‘resting’ state of the Gα subunit, with GTP. It is thought that the GTP-bound G protein dissociates into two signaling entities: the Gα subunit bound to GTP and the Gβγ subunit, both of which activate downstream effectors to initiate a physiological response. That response is then terminated when the Gα subunit hydrolyzes GTP to GDP and re-associates with the Gβγ subunit, and the process can begin anew [reviewed by 1]. The α subunit is the primary determinant for which receptor the G protein couples and the defining feature of the G protein. Therefore, G proteins are categorized by the Gα subunit. Together they make up four subfamilies: the Gs subfamily stimulates adenylyl cyclase [2]; the Gi subfamily inhibits adenylyl cyclase and regulates ion channels [3, 4]; the Gq/11 subfamily activates phospholipase C beta and results in an influx of Ca2+ [5]; and the G12/13 subfamily regulates small GTP binding proteins, such as rho, which modulates the cytoskeleton [6]. Approximately twenty different subtypes of the α subunit exist [7]. Five subtypes of the β subunit [8] and 11 subtypes of the γ subunit [9, 10] have been identified as well. Combinations of the different α, β and γ subtypes provide a great diversity of signaling pathways that can be regulated by GPCRs, other activators of G protein signaling (AGS) or regulators of G protein signaling (RGS). It is interesting to note that very little is known about how GPCRs selectively couple to a single subtype of the α subunit. This phenomenon is especially striking considering there are a thousand GPCRs of diverse primary structure [11], yet there are only four subfamilies of G proteins. High-resolution structural insight into the receptor- G protein complex is difficult to obtain due to the dynamic nature of the interaction. Currently, static images of the various states of the Gα subunit [12–16], the inactive structure of rhodopsin [17] and recently the structure of Giα in the presence of ICL3 receptor mimic and βγ-interacting peptides [18] have been described. These images, along with biophysical studies [19–21], have supplied knowledge about the receptor- G protein interaction, but a complete depiction of the ternary complex is still elusive [22]. The G protein interacts with many non-GPCR related proteins, or activators of G protein signaling (AGS), that share no sequence homology and activate G proteins by different signaling mechanisms [23]. In order to understand the differential activation and the fluctuation of G protein states, a comprehensive collection of G protein structures needs to be obtained [1]. Heterologous expression systems have been successful at generating the copious amount of isotope-labeled soluble protein needed for high-resolution NMR studies in other protein systems. As a step towards these structural studies of G protein states, we need to utilize and improve the use of Escherichia coli (E. coli), which can provide a scalable production source of recombinant proteins. Advantages include speed, inducibility for control of optimal expression, isotope labeling for high-resolution NMR studies, cost and ease of purification. Of the twenty different subtypes of the Gα subunit identified, five have been successfully expressed in E. coli: wild-type and mutant forms of Gsα, Gi1α, Gi2α, Gi3α and Goα, all of which only differ from their mammalian sources by post-translational covalent modification. However, the expression of these proteins is not without its challenges. The current protocol requires long growth times (24–36 h) at moderate temperature (30 °C) and often multi-step purification to obtain active protein [24]. Expression levels of active protein vary depending on the α subunit expressed; Gsα expression typically yields 0.1–1 mg/L, while Giα expression yields 40 mg/L [24, 25]. Many of the Gα subunits (Gqα family, G12α family and Gtα (transducin) from the Giα family) have not been successfully obtained from bacterial systems. Manipulation at the DNA level to produce chimeras of different α subunits has been successful at producing proteins that resemble these difficult-to-express proteins: a transducin/Giα chimera was made to achieve soluble active transducin-like protein, expressed in E. coli, at levels of 3–6 mg/L for biophysical studies [26, 27]. Chimeras of G12α and G13α, also with Giα, were used to produce these hard-to-express Gα subunits in baculovirus systems [28]. Interestingly these chimeras only differ from their parent protein by 11 amino acids. The 11 amino acid exchange allowed for difficult-to-express Gα production in the recombinant systems while maintaining the parent Gα selectivity. Table 1 summarizes the literature available on the current expression systems used to acquire the representative members of the Gα subunits for structural characterization. TABLE 1 Previously reported expression yields for representative Gα subunits. While Sf9 cells have been successful at producing some of the more challenging Gα subunits they have several drawbacks. Recombinant protein production from insect cells is time-consuming and laborious and often gives rise to heterogeneous populations of proteins, due to variable posttranslational modifications. Sf9 cells also natively express certain G alpha subunits – Gsα, Goα and Gqα– which account for 10–40% of total active Gα subunit. These contaminating endogenous Gα subunit require additional purification procedures, with final yields in the μg/L range [29]. Methods for expressing the protein in inclusion bodies and then efficiently refolding the Gα subunits would be of great value for characterization of the structure and properties of the Gα subunit. In addition, Gα is quite prone to loss of activity upon storage at 4 °C, regardless of the original source of expression, requiring storage in small samples at −80 °C in order to prevent denaturation. A refolding method would allow for E. coli production of Gα subunits that can be stored in denaturant at room temperature or as inclusion bodies and quickly refolded when needed. Successfully refolding Gα would enable a rescue of the protein lost during expression, a simplified method of production for those Gα that have proven recalcitrant to other production methods, and sufficient quantities of isotope-labeled Gα subunits for high-resolution NMR studies.

Plasma membrane heterotrimeric G proteins transduce extracellular signals from seven transmembrane receptors to downstream effectors. In addition, G proteins and their regulators localize at multiple intracellular sites and play crucial roles in cell division. In model organisms such as Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila receptor-independent heterotrimeric G protein function is vital for the orientation of mitotic spindle, generation of microtubule pulling force, aster-induced cytokinesis, and centration of the nucleus-centrosome complex. This new paradigm is now being extended to mammalian cells. Mammalian G protein signaling components localize in centrosomes and at the midbody, and altered function or expression of these proteins can cause cell division defects. Here, we highlight the role and possible mechanisms of G protein signaling in mammalian cell division in conjunction with recent findings in model organisms. Together the evidence argues for a more direct role of non-canonical heterotrimeric G protein signaling in microtubule- and actin cytoskeleton-mediated cellular processes.

In contrast to the other heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins (G proteins) Gsand Gi, the functional role of Gois still poorly defined. To investigate the role of Gαoin the heart, we generated transgenic mice with cardiac-specific expression of a constitutively active form of Gαo1* (Gαo*), the predominant Gαoisoform in the heart. Gαoexpression was increased 3- to 15-fold in mice from 5 independent lines, all of which had a normal life span and no gross cardiac morphological abnormalities. We demonstrate enhanced contractile function in Gαo* transgenic mice in vivo, along with increased L-type Ca2+channel current density, calcium transients, and cell shortening in ventricular Gαo*-expressing myocytes compared with wild-type controls. These changes were evident at baseline and maintained after isoproterenol stimulation. Expression levels of all major Ca2+handling proteins were largely unchanged, except for a modest reduction in Na+/Ca2+exchanger in transgenic ventricles. In contrast, phosphorylation of the ryanodine receptor and phospholamban at known PKA sites was increased 1.6- and 1.9-fold, respectively, in Gαo* ventricles. Density and affinity of β-adrenoceptors, cAMP levels, and PKA activity were comparable in Gαo* and wild-type myocytes, but protein phosphatase 1 activity was reduced upon Gαo* expression, particularly in the vicinity of the ryanodine receptor. We conclude that Gαo* exerts a positive effect on Ca2+cycling and contractile function. Alterations in protein phosphatase 1 activity rather than PKA-mediated phosphorylation might be involved in hyperphosphorylation of key Ca2+handling proteins in hearts with constitutive Gαoactivation.

Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins enhance the intrinsic GTPase activity of G protein alpha (Galpha) subunits and are vital for proper signaling kinetics downstream of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). R7 subfamily RGS proteins specifically and obligately dimerize with the atypical G protein beta5 (Gbeta5) subunit through an internal G protein gamma (Ggamma)-subunit-like (GGL) domain. Here we present the 1.95-A crystal structure of the Gbeta5-RGS9 complex, which is essential for normal visual and neuronal signal transduction. This structure reveals a canonical RGS domain that is functionally integrated within a molecular complex that is poised for integration of multiple steps during G-protein activation and deactivation.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae mating pheromones trigger dissociation of a heterotrimeric G protein (Galphabetagamma) into Galpha-guanosine triphosphate (GTP) and Gbetagamma. The Gbetagamma dimer regulates both mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase cascade signaling and cell polarization. Here, by independently activating the MAP kinase pathway, we studied the polarity role of Gbetagamma in isolation from its signaling role. MAP kinase signaling alone could induce cell asymmetry but not directional growth. Surprisingly, active Gbetagamma, either alone or with Galpha-GTP, could not organize a persistent polarization axis. Instead, following pheromone gradients (chemotropism) or directional growth without pheromone gradients (de novo polarization) required an intact receptor-Galphabetagamma module and GTP hydrolysis by Galpha. Our results indicate that chemoattractant-induced cell polarization requires continuous receptor-Galphabetagamma communication but not modulation of MAP kinase signaling. To explore regulation of Gbetagamma by Galpha, we mutated Gbeta residues in two structurally distinct Galpha-Gbeta binding interfaces. Polarity control was disrupted only by mutations in the N-terminal interface, and not the Switch interface. Incorporation of these mutations into a Gbeta-Galpha fusion protein, which enforces subunit proximity, revealed that Switch interface dissociation regulates signaling, whereas the N-terminal interface may govern receptor-Galphabetagamma coupling. These findings raise the possibility that the Galphabetagamma heterotrimer can function in a partially dissociated state, tethered by the N-terminal interface.

We previously reported that Gbetagamma signaling regulates cell spreading or cell shape change through activation of a Rho family small GTPase, suggesting the existence of a Gbetagamma-regulated Rho guanine-nucleotide exchange factor (RhoGEF). In this study we examined various RhoGEF clones, found FLJ00018 to beaGbetagamma-activated RhoGEF, and investigated the molecular mechanism of Gbetagamma-induced activation of Rho family GTPases. Co-expression of the genes for FLJ00018 and Gbetagamma enhanced serum response element-mediated gene transcription in HEK-293 cells. Combined expression of Gbetagamma and FLJ00018 significantly induced activation of Rac and Cdc42 but not RhoA. FLJ00018 also enhanced gene transcription induced by carbachol-stimulated m2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor, and this enhancement was blocked by pertussis toxin. Furthermore, we demonstrated Gbetagamma to interact directly with the N-terminal region of FLJ00018 and the N-terminal fragment of this molecule to inhibit serum response element-dependent transcription induced by Gbetagamma/FLJ00018 and carbachol. In NIH3T3 cells, FLJ00018 enhanced lysophosphatidic acid-induced cell spreading, which was also blocked by the N-terminal fragment of FLJ00018. These results provide evidence for a signaling pathway by which G(i)-coupled receptor specifically induces Rac and Cdc42 activation through direct interaction of Gbetagamma with FLJ00018.

Dictyostelium discoideum expresses multiple G alpha subunits but only a single G beta and G gamma subunit suggesting that the specific response to an external signal depends largely on G alpha subunit function or G protein-independent signaling from the receptor. To test the contribution of G alpha subunit functional specificity, the chimeric G alpha subunits, G alpha2/4 and G alpha5/4, were created and analyzed along with wild-type subunits for the ability to substitute for the G alpha4 subunit in mediating responses from folate receptors. The G alpha2/4 subunit, but not the G alpha2 or G alpha5/4 subunits, partly rescued chemotaxis and cGMP accumulation in folate-stimulated g alpha4(-) cells. Expression of the G alpha5/4 or G alpha5 subunits resulted in an inhibition of g alpha4- and wild-type cell movement and a reduced aggregate size in developing wild-type and g alpha5- cells suggesting these subunits mediate similar responses. Only the G alpha4 subunit was capable of correcting developmental morphology in g alpha4- multicellular aggregates suggesting that the chimeric G alpha2/4 or G alpha5/4 subunits were insufficient to provide the G alpha4 function necessary for proper development. These results indicate that Dictyostelium G alpha subunit specificity is not limited to receptor coupling and that G alpha subunit sequences outside of the carboxyl terminus are important for cell movement and developmental processes.

Members of the phosducin gene family were initially proposed to act as down-regulators of G protein signaling by binding G protein betagamma dimers (Gbetagamma) and inhibiting their ability to interact with G protein alpha subunits (Galpha) and effectors. However, recent findings have over-turned this hypothesis by showing that most members of the phosducin family act as co-chaperones with the cytosolic chaperonin complex (CCT) to assist in the folding of a variety of proteins from their nascent polypeptides. In fact rather than inhibiting G protein pathways, phosducin-like protein 1 (PhLP1) has been shown to be essential for G protein signaling by catalyzing the folding and assembly of the Gbetagamma dimer. PhLP2 and PhLP3 have no role in G protein signaling, but they appear to assist in the folding of proteins essential in regulating cell cycle progression as well as actin and tubulin. Phosducin itself is the only family member that does not participate with CCT in protein folding, but it is believed to have a specific role in visual signal transduction to chaperone Gbetagamma subunits as they translocate to and from the outer and inner segments of photoreceptor cells during light-adaptation.

Syntrophins are components of the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex of the plasma membrane in muscular and neuronal cells, and recruit signaling proteins such as neuronal nitric oxide synthase via their multiple protein-protein interaction motifs. In this study, we found that alpha1-syntrophin binds to various subtypes of guanine nucleotide-binding protein alpha subunits (Galpha). A pull-down analysis using full-length recombinant alpha1-syntrophin and MS analysis showed that alpha1-syntrophin was coprecipitated with several isoforms of Galpha proteins in addition to known binding partners such as dystrobrevin and neuronal nitric oxide synthase. Further analysis using recombinant Galpha isoforms showed that alpha1-syntrophin associates with at least Galphai, Galphao, Galphas and Galphaq subtypes. The region of alpha1-syntrophin required for its interaction with Galphas was determined as the N-terminal half of the first pleckstrin homology domain. In addition, the syntrophin unique domain of alpha1-syntrophin was suggested to contribute to this interaction. In COS-7 cells, downregulation of alpha1-syntrophin by RNAi resulted in enhanced cAMP production and cAMP response element-binding protein phosphorylation induced by isoproterenol treatment. These results suggest that alpha1-syntrophin provides a scaffold for the Galpha family of heterotrimeric G proteins in the brain to regulate the efficiency of signal transduction evoked by G-protein-coupled receptors.

Perturbation of pheromone signaling modulates not only mating but also virulence in Cryptococcus neoformans, an opportunistic human pathogen known to encode three Galpha, one Gbeta, and two Ggamma subunit proteins. We have found that Galphas Gpa2 and Gpa3 exhibit shared and distinct roles in regulating pheromone responses and mating. Gpa2 interacted with the pheromone receptor homolog Ste3alpha, Gbeta subunit Gpb1, and RGS protein Crg1. Crg1 also exhibited in vitro GAP activity toward Gpa2. These findings suggest that Gpa2 regulates mating through a conserved signaling mechanism. Moreover, we found that Ggammas Gpg1 and Gpg2 both regulate pheromone responses and mating. gpg1 mutants were attenuated in mating, and gpg2 mutants were sterile. Finally, although gpa2, gpa3, gpg1, gpg2, and gpg1 gpg2 mutants were fully virulent, gpa2 gpa3 mutants were attenuated for virulence in a murine model. Our study reveals a conserved but distinct signaling mechanism by two Galpha, one Gbeta, and two Ggamma proteins for pheromone responses, mating, and virulence in Cryptococcus neoformans, and it also reiterates that the link between mating and virulence is not due to mating per se but rather to certain mating-pathway components that encode additional functions promoting virulence.

Numerous heptahelical receptors use activation of heterotrimeric G proteins to convey a multitude of extracellular signals to appropriate effector molecules in the cell. Both high specificity and correct integration of these signals are required for reliable cell function. Yet the molecular machineries that allow each cell to merge information flowing across different receptors are not well understood. Here we demonstrate that G protein-regulated inwardly rectifying K+ (GIRK) channels can operate as dynamic integrators of α-adrenergic and cholinergic signals in atrial myocytes. Acting at the last step of the cholinergic signaling cascade, these channels are activated by direct interactions with βγ subunits of the inhibitory G proteins (Gβγ), and efficiently translate M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (M2R) activation into membrane hyperpolarization. The parallel activation of α-adrenergic receptors imposed a distinctive “signature” on the function of M2R-activated GIRK1/4 channels, affecting both the probability of Gβγ binding to the channel and its desensitization. This modulation of channel function was correlated with a parallel depletion of Gβ and protein phosphatase 1 from the oligomeric GIRK1 complexes. Such plasticity of the immediate GIRK signaling environment suggests that multireceptor integration involves large protein networks undergoing dynamic changes upon receptor activation.

Communication between cells and their environments is often mediated by G protein-coupled receptors and cognate G proteins. In fungi, one such signaling cascade is the mating pathway triggered by pheromone/pheromone receptor recognition. Unlike Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which expresses two Galpha subunits, most filamentous ascomycetes and basidiomycetes have three Galpha subunits. Previous studies have defined the Galpha subunit acting upstream of the cAMP-protein kinase A pathway, but it has been unclear which Galpha subunit is coupled to the pheromone receptor and response pathway. Here we report that in the pathogenic basidiomycetous yeast Cryptococcus neoformans, two Galpha subunits (Gpa2, Gpa3) sense pheromone and govern mating. gpa2 gpa3 double mutants, but neither gpa2 nor gpa3 single mutants, are sterile in bilateral crosses. By contrast, deletion of GPA3 (but not GPA2) constitutively activates pheromone response and filamentation. Expression of GPA2 and GPA3 is differentially regulated: GPA3 expression is induced by nutrient-limitation, whereas GPA2 is induced during mating. Based on the phenotype of dominant active alleles, Gpa2 and Gpa3 signal in opposition: Gpa2 promotes mating, whereas Gpa3 inhibits. The incorporation of an additional Galpha into the regulatory circuit enabled increased signaling complexity and facilitated cell fate decisions involving choice between yeast growth and filamentous asexual/sexual development.

Signal transduction is the means by which cells respond to variations in their environment. G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of cell-surface receptors, accounting for1% of the human genome. GPCRs respond to a wide variety of extracellular signals, including peptides, ions, amino acids, hormones, growth factors, light and odorant molecules. The receptors couple with heterotrimeric G proteins to transduce their signal across the membrane and into the cell. This coupling promotes the exchange of GDP for GTP on the Galpha subunit, leading to effector activation by both Galpha-GTP and Gbetagamma. Functional selectivity, whereby conformational changes in GPCRs induced by agonist binding lead to unique conformations that can differentially modulate the G protein coupling process, was first proposed over a decade ago. The implications are far reaching in pharmacology, as it means that a GPCR could have a different pharmacological profile depending on which G protein is activated and that the same GPCR could have different roles depending on the activating molecule as well as the G proteins present in the local environment.

The G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family represents the largest and most versatile group of cell surface receptors. Classical GPCR signaling constitutes ligand binding to a seven-transmembrane domain receptor, receptor interaction with a heterotrimeric G protein, and the subsequent activation or inhibition of downstream intracellular effectors to mediate a cellular response. However, recent reports on direct, receptor-independent G protein activation, G protein-independent signaling by GPCRs, and signaling of nonheptahelical receptors via trimeric G proteins have highlighted the intrinsic complexities of G protein signaling mechanisms. The insulin-like growth factor-II/mannose-6 phosphate (IGF-II/M6P) receptor is a single-transmembrane glycoprotein whose principal function is the intracellular transport of lysosomal enzymes. In addition, the receptor also mediates some biological effects in response to IGF-II binding in both neuronal and nonneuronal systems. Multidisciplinary efforts to elucidate the intracellular signaling pathways that underlie these effects have generated data to suggest that the IGF-II/M6P receptor might mediate transmembrane signaling via a G protein-coupled mechanism. The purpose of this review is to outline the characteristics of traditional and nontraditional GPCRs, to relate the IGF-II/M6P receptor's structure with its role in G protein-coupled signaling and to summarize evidence gathered over the years regarding the putative signaling of the IGF-II/M6P receptor mediated by a G protein.

Heterotrimeric G-proteins transduce signals from activated G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) to appropriate downstream effectors and thereby play an important role in signaling. A role of G-proteins in salinity and heat stress tolerance has not heretofore been described. We report isolation of cDNAs of two isoforms of Galpha (Galpha1, 1152 bp; Galpha2, 1152 bp), one Gbeta (1134 bp), two isoforms of Ggamma (Ggamma1, 345 bp; Ggamma2, 303 bp) and a GPCR (1008 bp) from Pisum sativum, and purification of all the encoded recombinant proteins (Galpha, 44 kDa; Gbeta, 41 kDa; Ggamma, 14 kDa; GPCR, 35 kDa). The transcript levels of Galpha and Gbeta were upregulated following NaCl, heat and H(2)O(2) treatments. Protein-protein interaction studies using an in vitro yeast two-hybrid system and in planta co-immunoprecipitation showed that the Galpha subunit interacted with the pea Gbeta subunit and pea phospholipase C (PLCdelta) at the calcium-binding domain (fn1). The GTPase activity of the Galpha subunit increased after interaction with PLCdelta. The GPCR protein interacted with all the subunits of G-proteins and with itself. Transgenic tobacco plants (T(0) and T(1)) constitutively over-expressing Galpha showed tolerance to salinity and heat, while Gbeta-over-expressing plants showed only heat tolerance, as tested by leaf disk senescence assay and germination/growth of T(1) seeds/seedlings. These findings provide direct evidence for a novel role of Galpha and Gbeta subunits in abiotic stress tolerance and possible cross-talk between PLC- and G-protein-mediated signaling pathways.

Leukotriene B4 (LTB4) is a potent chemoattractant for leukocytes and considered to be an inflammatory mediator. Human BLT2 (hBLT2) is a low-affinity G-protein coupled receptor for LTB4 and mediates pertussis toxin-sensitive chemotactic cell movement. Here, we dissected the interaction between hBLT2 and G-protein alpha subunits using GST fusion proteins containing intracellular regions of hBLT2 and various Gα protein including Gα i1, Gα i2, Gα i3, Gα s1, Gα o1, and Gα z. Among the tested Gα subunits, Gα i3 showed the highest binding to the third intracellular loop region of hBLT2 with a dissociation constant (KD) of 5.0 × 10?6 M. These results suggest that Gα i3 has the highest affinity to hBLT2, and the third intracellular loop region of hBLT2 is the major component for the interaction with Gα i3.

The bradykinin receptor is a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that is coupled to the Galpha(q) family of heterotrimeric G proteins. In general, a GPCR can exert intracellular signals either by transiently associating with multiple diffusing G protein subunits or by activating a G protein that is stably bound to the receptor, thus generating a signal that is limited by the stoichiometry of the complex. Here we have distinguished between these models by monitoring the association of type 2 bradykinin receptor (B(2)R) and the Galpha(q)/Gbetagamma heterotrimer in living human embryonic kidney 293 cells expressing fluorescent-tagged proteins. Stable B(2)R-Galpha(q) x Gbetagamma complexes are observed in resting cells by fluorescence resonance energy transfer from either Galpha(q)-eCFP or eCFP-Gbetagamma to B(2)R-eYFP. Stimulating the cells with bradykinin causes detachment of B(2)R from the G protein subunits as the receptor internalizes into early endosomes, with a corresponding elimination of B(2)R-G protein fluorescence resonance energy transfer because Galpha(q) and its associated Gbetagamma remain on the plasma membrane. Single point and scanning fluorescence correlation spectroscopy measurements show that a portion of B(2)R molecules diffuses with a mobility corresponding to dimers or small oligomers, whereas a second fraction diffuses in higher order molecular assemblies. Our studies support a model in which receptors are pre-coupled with their corresponding G proteins in the basal state of cells thereby limiting the response to an external signal to a defined stoichiometry that allows for a rapid and directed cellular response.

Heterotrimeric G proteins function as molecular relays that mediate signal transduction from heptahelical receptors in the cell membrane to intracellular effector proteins. Crystallographic studies have demonstrated that guanine nucleotide exchange on the Galpha subunit causes specific conformational changes in three key "switch" regions of the protein, which regulate binding to Gbetagamma subunits, receptors, and effector proteins. In the present study, nitroxide side chains were introduced at sites within the switch I region of Galphai to explore the structure and dynamics of this region throughout the G protein cycle. EPR spectra obtained for each of the Galpha(GDP), Galpha(GDP)betagamma heterotrimer and Galpha(GTPgammaS) conformations are consistent with the local environment observed in the corresponding crystal structures. Binding of the heterotrimer to activated rhodopsin to form the nucleotide-free (empty) complex, for which there is no crystal structure, causes prominent changes relative to the heterotrimer in the structure of switch I and contiguous sequences. The data identify a putative pathway of allosteric changes triggered by receptor binding and, together with previously published data, suggest elements of a mechanism for receptor-catalyzed nucleotide exchange.

Heterotrimeric G proteins (G-proteins) are a diverse class of signal transducing proteins which have been implicated in a variety of important roles in plants. When G-proteins are activated, they dissociate into two functional subunits (a and the beta gamma, dinner) that effectively relay the signal to a multitude of effectors. In animal systems, the beta gamma dimer is anchored to the plasma membrane by a prenyl group present in the gamma subunit and membrane localization has proven vital for heterotrimer function. A semi-dominant negative strategy was designed aiming to disrupt heterotrimer function in Arabidopsis thaliana (ecotype Columbia) plants by over-expressing a truncated y subunit lacking the isoprenylation motif (gamma*). Northern analysis shows that the levels of expression of the mutant -y subunit in several transgenic lines (35S-gamma*) are orders of magnitude higher than that of the native subunits. In-depth characterization of the 35S-gamma* lines has been carried out, specifically focusing on a number of developmental characteristics and responses to several stimuli previously shown to be affected in alpha- and [beta-deficient mutants. In all cases, the transgenic lines expressing the mutant gamma subunit behave in the same way as the alpha- and/or the beta-deficient mutants, albeit with reduced severity of the phenotype. Our data indicates that signaling from both functional subunits, a and the beta/gamma dimer, is disrupted in the transgenic plants. Even though physical association of the subunits has been previously reported, our research provides evidence of the functional association of alpha and beta with the gamma subunits in Arabidopsis, while also suggesting that plasma membrane localization may be critical for function of plant heterotrimeric G proteins. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Heterotrimeric G proteins play a central role in intracellular communication mediated by extracellular signals, and both Galpha and Gbetagamma subunits regulate effectors downstream of activated receptors. The particular constituents of the G protein heterotrimer affect both specificity and efficiency of signal transduction. However, little is known about mechanistic aspects of G protein assembly in the cell that would certainly contribute to formation of heterotrimers of specific composition. It was recently shown that phosducin-like protein (PhLP) modulated both Gbetagamma expression and subsequent signaling by chaperoning nascent Gbeta and facilitating heterodimer formation with Ggamma subunits (Lukov, G. L., Hu, T., McLaughlin, J. N., Hamm, H. E., and Willardson, B. M. (2005) EMBO J. 24, 1965-1975; Humrich, J., Bermel, C., Bunemann, M., Harmark, L., Frost, R., Quitterer, U., and Lohse, M. J. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 20042-20050). Here we demonstrate using a variety of techniques that DRiP78, an endoplasmic reticulum resident protein known to regulate the trafficking of several seven transmembrane receptors, interacts specifically with the Ggamma subunit but not Gbeta or Galpha subunits. Furthermore, we demonstrate that DRiP78 and the Gbeta subunit can compete for the Ggamma subunit. DRiP78 also protects Ggamma from degradation until a stable partner such as Gbeta is provided. Furthermore, DRiP78 interaction may represent a mechanism for assembly of specific Gbetagamma heterodimers, as selectivity was observed among Ggamma isoforms for interaction with DRiP78 depending on the presence of particular Gbeta subunits. Interestingly, we could detect an interaction between DRiP78 and PhLP, suggesting a role of DRiP78 in the assembly of Gbetagamma by linking Ggamma to PhLP.Gbeta complexes. Our results, therefore, suggest a role of DRiP78 as a chaperone in the assembly of Gbetagamma subunits of the G protein.

Heterotrimeric G proteins are pivotal regulators of myocardial contractility. In addition to the receptor-induced GDP/GTP exchange, G protein α subunits can be activated by a phosphate transfer via a plasma membrane-associated complex of nucleoside diphosphate kinase B (NDPK B) and G protein βγ-dimers (Gβγ). To investigate the physiological role of this phosphate transfer in cardiomyocytes, we generated a Gβ 1 γ 2 -dimer carrying a single amino acid exchange at the intermediately phosphorylated His-266 in the β 1 subunit (Gβ 1 H266Lγ 2 ). Recombinantly expressed Gβ 1 H266Lγ 2 were integrated into heterotrimeric G proteins in rat cardiomyocytes but were deficient in intermediate Gβ phosphorylation. Compared with wild-type Gβ 1 γ 2 (Gβ 1 WTγ 2 ), overexpression of Gβ 1 H266Lγ 2 suppressed basal cAMP formation up to 55%. A similar decrease in basal cAMP production occurred when the formation of NDPK B/Gβγ complexes was attenuated by siRNA-mediated NDPK B knockdown. In adult rat cardiomyocytes expressing Gβ 1 H266Lγ 2 , the basal contractility was suppressed by ≈50% which correlated to similarly reduced basal cAMP levels and reduced Ser16-phosphorylation of phospholamban. In the presence of the β-adrenoceptor agonist isoproterenol, the total cAMP formation and contractility were significantly lower in Gβ 1 H266Lγ 2 than in Gβ 1 WTγ 2 expressing cardiomyocytes. However, the relative isoproterenol-induced increased was not affected by Gβ 1 H266Lγ 2 . We conclude that the receptor-independent activation of G proteins via NDPK B/Gβγ complexes requires the intermediate phosphorylation of G protein β subunits at His-266. Our results highlight the histidine kinase activity of NDPK B for Gβ and demonstrate its contribution to the receptor-independent regulation of cAMP synthesis and contractility in intact cardiomyocytes.

The Arabidopsis thaliana heterotrimeric G protein complex is encoded by single canonical Galpha and Gbeta subunit genes and two Ggamma subunit genes (AGG1 and AGG2), raising the possibility that the two potential G protein complexes mediate different cellular processes. Mutants with reduced expression of one or both Ggamma genes revealed specialized roles for each Ggamma subunit. AGG1-deficient mutants, but not AGG2-deficient mutants, showed impaired resistance against necrotrophic pathogens, reduced induction of the plant defensin gene PDF1.2, and decreased sensitivity to methyl jasmonate. By contrast, both AGG1- and AGG2-deficient mutants were hypersensitive to auxin-mediated induction of lateral roots, suggesting that Gbetagamma1 and Gbetagamma2 synergistically inhibit auxin-dependent lateral root initiation. However, the involvement of each Ggamma subunit in this root response differs, with Gbetagamma1 acting within the central cylinder, attenuating acropetally transported auxin signaling, while Gbetagamma2 affects the action of basipetal auxin and graviresponsiveness within the epidermis and/or cortex. This selectivity also operates in the hypocotyl. Selectivity in Gbetagamma signaling was also found in other known AGB1-mediated pathways. agg1 mutants were hypersensitive to glucose and the osmotic agent mannitol during seed germination, while agg2 mutants were only affected by glucose. We show that both Ggamma subunits form functional Gbetagamma dimers and that each provides functional selectivity to the plant heterotrimeric G proteins, revealing a mechanism underlying the complexity of G protein-mediated signaling in plants.

We present evidence that heterotrimeric G protein signaling is involved in cell death associated with the unfolded protein response (UPR) in Arabidopsis . Seedlings of homozygous agb1-2 (Gβ-null mutation) mutant plants are markedly more resistant to growth inhibition by the protein glycosylation inhibitor tunicamycin (Tm) than either wild-type plants or gpa1-4 (Gα-null mutation) mutants. Leaves of older Gβ mutant plants show much less cell death when infiltrated with Tm than leaves of wild-type plants. The transcriptional response of Gβ mutant plants to Tm is less pronounced than that of wild-type plants, as is the accumulation of BiP chaperone proteins. A majority of the Arabidopsis Gβ protein is associated with the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and cofractionates with membrane-associated ER luminal BiP. Consistent with its ER localization, Gβ protein is degraded during the UPR, whereas Gα protein is not. Taken together, these observations imply that the Gβ protein, which forms a stable heterodimer with the Gγ subunit, is involved in the signaling events that trigger UPR-associated cell death. The different Tm sensitivities of Gα and Gβ mutants, the ER localization of Gβ, and the differential stabilities of Gα and Gβ proteins during the UPR suggest that the Gβγ complex serves a signaling function in the ER independent of its function in the Gαβγ heterotrimer.