ABSTRACTAfter six decades of power, the Kim regime in the Democratic Peopleâs Republic of Korea (DPRK) remains a mystery to many in the West. Indeed, the North Korean revolution following World War Two is not well accounted for by Western scholars, analysts and statesmen.. The elder, Kim il Sung, the founder of the DPRK, ruled from its inception in 1948 until his death in 1994. He was most often portrayed as a communist revolutionary under the control and support of Stalin and, later, Mao. As a result, the DPRK was frequently and largely oversimplified, not as an isolated strategic issue on its own merit, but as an important actor on the much larger stage of the Cold War. His son, Kim Jung il, succeeded him and remains in firm control of a sovereign, albeit, desperate state in a strategically important region of the world. Nonetheless, the DPRK today is usually portrayed as a hopeless relic of the Cold War era, ruled by an eccentric and ruthless dictator, who is both a buffoon and unstable in his actions. Despite these characterizations, the regime remains of significant interest to the United States and its allies.These persistent mischaracterizations exemplify the fact that existing analyses of the power base of the Kim regime is inadequate and unsatisfactory. An enduring problem is the fact that many analysts focus their attention on the Kimâs themselves, and not the character, culture, and ideological sources that sustain the government of the DPRK.This paper investigates the foundations and the nature of Korean millenarian nationalism; an important variable in the origins and long term support of the DPRK. It goes beyond the ruling Kim family and examines the durability of millenarian expectations that stand at the very foundation of Korean culture and have performed a significant role in the evolution of Korean politics. The paper concludes that Korean millenarian nationalism, not communist ideology, is the most important variable in the continuation of the Kim regime in DPRK, nearly twenty years after the end of the Cold War. ..PAT.-Unpublished Manuscript [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]