Search

Mustafa Abdo,1 Frederik Trinkmann,2,3 Anne-Marie Kirsten,4 Heike Biller,1 Frauke Pedersen,1,4 Benjamin Waschki,1 Erika Von Mutius,5 Matthias Kopp,6,7 Gesine Hansen,8 Klaus F Rabe,1 Thomas Bahmer,1,9,&ast; Henrik Watz4,&ast; On behalf of the ALLIANCE study group1LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany; 2Department of Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany; 3Department of Biomedical Informatics, Heinrich-Lanz-Center, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany; 4Pulmonary Research Institute at the LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany; 5Dr von Hauner Children’s Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), and Institute of Asthma and Allergy Prevention, Helmholtz Centre, Both Munich, Germany; 6Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Inselspital, University Children’s Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; 7Division of Pediatric Pneumology & Allergology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Luebeck, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Luebeck, Germany; 8Department of Paediatric Pneumology, Allergology and Neonatology, Hannover Medical School, Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease (BREATH), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Hannover, Germany; 9University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Kiel, department for Internal Medicine I, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Kiel, Germany&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Mustafa AbdoLungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Wöhrendamm 80, Grosshansdorf, 22927, GermanyTel +49 4102 601 2412Email m.abdo@lungenclinic.deRationale: Small airway dysfunction (SAD) is a frequent feature of asthma that has been linked to disease severity and poor symptom control. However, little is known about the role of SAD in nocturnal asthma.Objective: To study the association between the severity of SAD and frequency of nocturnal symptoms compared to conventional lung function testing.Methods: We assessed the frequency of self-reported nocturnal symptoms through the asthma control test. We studied the impact of nocturnal asthma using the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) and the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20). We assessed the lung function using spirometry, body plethysmography, impulse oscillometry, single and multiple inert gas washout and measured markers of T2-inflammation (blood and sputum eosinophils; fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNo)). We stratified the patients according to the presence and frequency of nocturnal asthma.Results: A total of 166 asthma patients were enrolled in the analysis. Eighty-seven patients (52%) reported to have nocturnal symptoms at least once in the last four weeks. The odds ratio of nocturnal asthma correlated with the severity of all non-spirometric measures of SAD, yet neither with airflow obstruction (FEV1 and FEV/FVC) nor with large airway resistance (R20). Patients with frequent nocturnal asthma (n = 29) had a numerical increase of T2 markers and more severe SAD, as indicated by all non-spirometric measures of SAD (all p-values < 0.05), worse overall asthma control, increased fatigue and reduced quality of life (all p-values < 0.01) compared to patients with infrequent nocturnal asthma (n = 58) or patients without nocturnal asthma (n = 79). We identified 63 patients without airflow obstruction, nearly 43% of them (n = 27) had nocturnal asthma. In this subgroup, only markers of air trapping and ventilation heterogeneity were significantly elevated and correlated with the frequency of nocturnal symptoms: LCI (Spearman’s coefficient = − 0.42, p < 0.001), RV% (− 0.32, p = 0.02).Conclusion: SAD is closely associated to asthma with nocturnal symptoms. Spirometry might underestimate the broad spectrum of distal lung function impairments in this population of patients.Keywords: small airway dysfunction, nocturnal asthma, ventilation heterogeneity, air trapping

Mustafa Abdo,1 Benjamin Waschki,2 Anne-Marie Kirsten,3 Frederik Trinkmann,4,5 Heike Biller,1 Christian Herzmann,6 Erika von Mutius,7 Matthias Kopp,8,9 Gesine Hansen,10 Klaus F Rabe,1 Thomas Bahmer,1,11,* Henrik Watz3,* On behalf of the ALLIANCE study group1LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany; 2Department of Cardiology and Pneumology at Hospital Itzehoe, Itzehoe, Germany; 3Pulmonary Research Institute at the LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany; 4Department of Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany; 5Department of Biomedical Informatics, Heinrich-Lanz-Center, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany; 6Research Center Borstel, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Borstel, Germany; 7Dr von Hauner Children’s Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany; 8Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Inselspital, University Children’s Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; 9Division of Pediatric Pneumology & Allergology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Luebeck, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Luebeck, Germany; 10Department of Paediatric Pneumology, Allergology and Neonatology, Hannover Medical School, Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease (BREATH), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Hannover, Germany; 11University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Kiel, Department for Internal Medicine I, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Kiel, Germany*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Mustafa AbdoLungenClinic Grosshansdorf GmbH, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Wöhrendamm 80, Großhansdorf, 22927, GermanyTel +49 4102 601 2412Email m.abdo@lungenclinic.deRationale: Asthma, obesity and physical activity (PA) are interrelated. However, longitudinal data with objective PA measures and direct assessment of body composition are still lacking.Objective: To study the impact of symptom control on PA and body composition.Methods: In a longitudinal cohort study of the German Center for Lung Research, we assessed the body composition of 233 asthma patients and 84 healthy controls using bioelectrical impedance analysis. PA (ie average daily steps and time of at least moderate activity, steps/min) was measured by accelerometry for one week. Asthma control was assessed by ACT score, ACQ-5 score and history of severe exacerbations. After two years of follow-up, we studied changes in physical activity and body composition in relation to asthma control.Results: Patients with uncontrolled asthma had increased fat mass and decreased muscle mass compared to patients with controlled asthma or healthy controls. Both fat mass and muscle mass correlated better with asthma control than the body mass index (BMI). In multivariate regressions adjusted for age and sex, asthma control and physical activity were independent predictors of body composition (R2 = 0.61, p&thinsp

BackgroundImpulse oscillometry (IOS) allows an effort-independent evaluation of small airway function in asthma. Unfortunately, well-determined minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for IOS measures are lacking. Here, we provide MCIDs for frequently used IOS measures, namely frequency dependence of resistance (FDR) and area of reactance (AX), in patients with asthma.MethodsWe performed IOS at baseline and 1 year later in adult patients with mild-to-severe asthma (n=235). In a two-step approach, we first applied a distribution-based method to statistically determine the MCID. Next, we validated the proposed MCID according to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), Asthma Control Questionnaire-7 (ACQ-7) and Asthma Control Test (ACT). We used multivariable analyses to investigate the proposed MCIDs as predictors for improvements in PROMs compared with the established MCID of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1).ResultsThe proposed MCID was a decline of ≥0.06 kPa·L−1·s−1and ≥0.65 kPa·L−1for FDR and AX, respectively. Patients who had changes beyond the MCIDs for both FDR and AX showed greater improvements in all PROMs than those who had not. The mean improvements in PROMs were beyond the established MCIDs for ACQ-7 and AQLQ, and approximated the MCID for ACT. Multivariable analyses demonstrated the MCIDs for both FDR and AX as independent predictors for the MCIDs of all PROMs. The MCID for FDR was a stronger predictor of all PROMs than the MCID for FEV1.ConclusionsThis study provides MCIDs for IOS-derived measures in adult patients with asthma and emphasises that small airway function is a distinguished end-point beyond the conventional measure of FEV1.

RationaleIn adults, personalised asthma treatment targets patients with type 2 (T2)-high and eosinophilic asthma phenotypes. It is unclear whether such classification is achievable in children.ObjectivesTo define T2-high asthma with easily accessible biomarkers and compare resulting phenotypes across all ages.MethodsIn the multicentre clinical All Age Asthma Cohort (ALLIANCE), 1125 participants (n=776 asthmatics, n=349 controls) were recruited and followed for 2 years (1 year in adults). Extensive clinical characterisation (questionnaires, blood differential count, allergy testing, lung function and sputum induction (in adults)) was performed at baseline and follow-ups. Interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5 and IL-13 were measured after stimulation of whole blood with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or anti-CD3/CD28.Measurements and main resultsBased on blood eosinophil counts and allergen-specific serum IgE antibodies, patients were categorised into four mutually exclusive phenotypes: “atopy-only”, “eosinophils-only”, “T2-high” (eosinophilia + atopy) and “T2-low” (neither eosinophilia nor atopy). The T2-high phenotype was found across all ages, even in very young children in whom it persisted to a large degree even after 2 years of follow-up. T2-high asthma in adults was associated with childhood onset, suggesting early origins of this asthma phenotype. In both children and adults, the T2-high phenotype was characterised by excessive production of specific IgE to allergens (pConclusionsUsing easily accessible biomarkers, patients with T2-high asthma can be identified across all ages delineating a distinct phenotype. These patients may benefit from therapy with biologicals even at a younger age.

Background: Little is known about physical activity in daily life among patients with sarcoidosis. Fatigue is a frequent and disabling symptom that might negatively affect physical activity levels. Methods: In patients with sarcoidosis, we measured physical activity (steps per day) by accelerometry (SenseWear Armband) for 1 week. We assessed lung function (DLCO, FVC), exercise capacity (6-min walking distance [6MWD]), health-related quality of life (St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ]), generic quality of life (12-Item Short-Form Health Survey [SF-12]), and fatigue (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory [MFI-20]). Results: We investigated 57 patients with sarcoidosis (mean age 50 years, 56% male, mean DLCO 73% predicted, mean FVC 91% predicted, mean 6MWD 525 m, mean steps per day 7,490), of whom n = 14 (25%) had severe fatigue. The MFI-20 subscales “reduced activity” and “physical fatigue” were weakly associated with steps per day on a bivariate level (Spearman ρ = –0.274 and ρ = –0.277, respectively; p < 0.05), while the other subscales and the total score were not. 6MWD, SGRQ score, and SF-12 (physical health) score showed stronger associations with steps per day in bivariate analyses (Pearson r = 0.499, r = –0.386, and r = 0.467, respectively; p < 0.01), and were independent predictors of steps per day in multivariate linear regression analyses adjusting for confounders (p < 0.05). In ROC curve analyses, 6MWD, SGRQ score, and SF-12 (physical health) score properly identified sedentary patients (steps per day p < 0.01). Fatigue was less predictive (MFI-20 subscale “general fatigue,” AUROC 0.70; p = 0.03). Conclusion: While exercise capacity and quality of life measurements were robust predictors of physical activity in patients with sarcoidosis, associations of objectively measured physical activity with fatigue were surprisingly weak. In sarcoidosis, fatigue might not preclude affected patients from being physically active, although this symptom is subjectively perceived as highly disabling.

Background: Physical activity (PA) is associated with disease severity in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), but longitudinal studies evaluating its prognostic value and changes over time are lacking. Methods: We measured PA (steps per day, SPD) in a cohort of 46 IPF-patients (mean age, 67 years; mean FVC, 76.1%pred.) by accelerometry at baseline, recorded survival status during 3 years follow-up and repeated measurements in survivors. We compared the prognostic value of PA to established mortality predictors including lung function (FVC, DLCO) and 6-min walking-distance (6MWD). Results: During follow-up (median 34 months) 20 patients (43%) died. SPD and FVC best identified non-survivors (AUROC-curve 0.79, p

The 3-min constant speed shuttle test (CSST) was used to examine the effect of tiotropium/olodaterol compared with tiotropium at reducing activity-related breathlessness in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).This was a randomised, double-blind, two-period crossover study including COPD patients with moderate to severe pulmonary impairment, lung hyperinflation at rest and a Mahler Baseline Dyspnoea Index After 6 weeks, there was a decrease in the intensity of breathlessness (Borg dyspnoea score) at the end of the 3-min CSST from baseline with both tiotropium (mean –0.968, 95% CI −1.238– −0.698; n=100) and tiotropium/olodaterol (mean −1.325, 95% CI −1.594– −1.056; n=101). The decrease in breathlessness was statistically significantly greater with tiotropium/olodaterol versus tiotropium (treatment difference −0.357, 95% CI −0.661– −0.053; p=0.0217).Tiotropium/olodaterol reduced activity-related breathlessness more than tiotropium in dyspnoeic patients with moderate to severe COPD exhibiting lung hyperinflation.

The efficacy and safety of twice-daily aclidinium bromide/formoterol fumarate was compared with that of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate in patients with stable, moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).AFFIRM COPD (Aclidinium and Formoterol Findings in Respiratory Medicine COPD) was a 24-week, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled study. Patients were randomised (1:1) to aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 µg twice-daily via Genuair/Pressair or salmeterol/fluticasone 50/500 µg twice-daily via Accuhaler. The primary end-point was peak forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) at week 24. Other end-points included Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) focal score at week 24, TDI and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) responders, COPD Assessment Test and SGRQ scores, assessment of COPD symptoms and exacerbations, use of reliever medication, and device preference. Adverse events were monitored throughout.In total, 933 patients were eligible (mean age 63.4 years, 65.1% male). Aclidinium/formoterol was superior to salmeterol/fluticasone in peak FEV1 and noninferior in TDI. Health status and reduction in exacerbation risk were similar in both groups. While both treatments were well tolerated, pneumonia occurred less frequently with aclidinium/formoterol than salmeterol/fluticasone.In stable COPD, aclidinium/formoterol significantly improved bronchodilation versus salmeterol/fluticasone, with equivalent benefits in symptom control and reduction in exacerbation risk. Both treatments were well tolerated and treatment-related adverse events were less common with aclidinium/formoterol.

Background: This randomized, double-blind, Phase IIIb study evaluated the 24-hour bronchodilatory efficacy of aclidinium bromide versus placebo and tiotropium in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods: Patients received aclidinium 400 μg twice daily (morning and evening), tiotropium 18 μg once daily (morning), or placebo for 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second area under the curve for the 24-hour period post-morning dose (FEV1 AUC0–24) at week 6. Secondary and additional endpoints included FEV1 AUC12–24, COPD symptoms (EXAcerbations of chronic pulmonary disease Tool-Respiratory Symptoms [E-RS] total score and additional symptoms questionnaire), and safety. Results: Overall, 414 patients were randomized and treated (FEV1 1.63 L [55.8% predicted]). Compared with placebo, FEV1 AUC0–24 and FEV1 AUC12–24 were significantly increased from baseline with aclidinium (Δ = 150 mL and 160 mL, respectively; p < 0.0001) and tiotropium (Δ = 140 mL and 123 mL, respectively; p < 0.0001) at week 6. Significant improvements in E-RS total scores over 6 weeks were numerically greater with aclidinium (p < 0.0001) than tiotropium (p < 0.05) versus placebo. Only aclidinium significantly reduced the severity of early-morning cough, wheeze, shortness of breath, and phlegm, and of nighttime symptoms versus placebo (p < 0.05). Adverse-event (AE) incidence (28%) was similar between treatments. Few anticholinergic AEs (

SummaryInduced sputum is a non-invasive sampling technique for the analysis of airway inflammation in various lung diseases and comprises valuable potential for the identification of biomarkers and therapeutic targets by molecular methods. In the context of biobanking with preservation of induced sputum samples for subsequent analyses we applied the HEPES-glutamic acid buffer-mediated organic solvent protection effect (HOPE)-technique for preparation of induced sputum samples.Induced sputum samples of 20 patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and 12 healthy controls were collected. Cell pellets of induced sputum samples were preserved with HOPE and subsequently embedded in paraffin. Immunostaining of paraffin-block sections for interleukin-8, interleukin-17, myeloperoxidase, matrixmetalloproteinase-9, CD68, and CD8 revealed distinct signals without antigen retrieval. Moreover, RNA was extracted and successfully used for transcription microarray analysis.Sputum samples preserved by the HOPE-technique display a tool to address scientific approaches in pulmonary research, which can enable the identification of new biomarkers and therapeutic targets in respiratory diseases.

Background Long-acting bronchodilators, including anticholinergics glycopyrronium and tiotropium, are central to symptomatic management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In patients with moderate to severe COPD, glycopyrronium has demonstrated comparable efficacy to open-label and single-blinded tiotropium, but with faster onset of bronchodilation. The FAST study assessed the efficacy of glycopyrronium compared with tiotropium in serial spirometry and body plethysmography assessments to further characterize the earlier onset of action associated with glycopyrronium. Methods In this German multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, double-dummy, cross-over study, patients with moderate-to-severe COPD received single-dose of glycopyrronium 44 μg and tiotropium 18 μg via the Breezhaler® and Handihaler® devices, respectively. Primary objective was to demonstrate superiority of glycopyrronium over tiotropium in terms of improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 s as assessed by the area under the curve from 0 to 2 h (FEV1 AUC 0–2h). Secondary endpoints were functional residual capacity (FRC), residual volume (RV), inspiratory capacity (IC), and specific airway resistance (sRaw), all measured by body plethysmography. Results Of the 152 patients randomised, 99.3% completed the study. After inhalation of the single dose, glycopyrronium demonstrated superiority over tiotropium in early bronchodilation as assessed by improvement in FEV1 AUC0–2h (least squares mean treatment difference = 37 mL; 95% CI: 16, 59 mL; p Conclusions Glycopyrronium was superior to tiotropium in terms of early bronchodilation. Although both glycopyrronium and tiotropium showed similar improvements in static lung volume parameters, glycopyrronium reduced specific airway resistance faster than tiotropium, which could in part explain the earlier FEV1 response seen with glycopyrronium. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01922271 .

Physical activity is reduced in severe asthma; impulse oscillometry was a better predictor than spirometry http://ow.ly/6WdN305D9aV

Background: Little is known about the consequences of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) for physical activity (PA). Objectives: We aimed to investigate levels of PA in IPF and to study associations of PA with lung function, exercise capacity, symptoms, and quality of life. Methods: In stable patients with IPF we measured PA (steps per day, SPD; physical activity level, PAL; minutes of moderate activity, MMA) by accelerometry (SenseWear Armband) for 1 week. We also assessed lung function (forced vital capacity, FVC; diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, DLCO); exercise capacity (6-minute walking distance, 6MWD); dyspnea (modified Medical Research Council, mMRC); fatigue (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, MFI-20), and generic (12-Item Short Form Survey, SF-12) and health-related quality of life (St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire) as further clinical variables. Results: We investigated 48 patients with IPF in two centers (mean age, 67 years; 75% male; 23% on long-term oxygen therapy; mean FVC 75%pred.; mean DLCO 43%pred.; mean 6MWD 355 ± 140 m; mean SPD 5,017 ± 3,360). On a bivariate level, all clinical variables were significantly associated with SPD (p < 0.05). The associations of mMRC, MFI-20, SF-12 (physical health), and 6MWD with SPD were independent of impaired lung function (p < 0.05). At multivariate analyses, either 6MWD (total explained variance of the model, total R2: 42%) or MFI-20 (total R2: 39%) were the strongest independent predictors of SPD. Conclusion: Fatigue and exercise capacity are strong and independent predictors of PA in patients with IPF, which suggests that both measures should be assessed when the consequences of IPF for PA in daily life are studied.

The efficacy and safety of aclidinium bromide bid, a novel, long-acting, muscarinic antagonist, was assessed in patients with moderate to severe COPD.In this phase IIa randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover trial, patients with moderate to severe COPD received aclidinium 400 μg bid, tiotropium 8 μg once daily, and placebo for 15 days, with a 9- to 15-day washout between treatment periods. Treatments were administered through the Genuair or HandiHaler dry powder inhalers. The primary end point was mean change from baseline in FEV(1) AUC(0-12/12h) (area under the curve where the numbers represent the time period for which data were collected divided by the number of hours over which the data are averaged [eg, 0-12 h postdose divided by 12 h]) on day 15. Secondary end points were changes from baseline in FEV(1) AUC(12-24/12h), FEV(1) AUC(0-24/24h), morning predose FEV(1), peak FEV(1), and COPD symptom scores.Thirty patients with COPD were randomized, and 27 completed the study. Mean change from baseline in FEV(1) AUC(0-12/12h) at day 15 was significantly greater for aclidinium and tiotropium over placebo (P.0001). Mean changes from baseline in FEV(1) AUC(12-24/12h), FEV(1) AUC(0-24/24h), morning predose FEV(1), and peak FEV(1) at day 15 were significantly greater for aclidinium and tiotropium over placebo (P.0001 for all except P.001 for FEV(1) AUC(12-24/12h) tiotropium vs placebo). Improvements were significantly greater with aclidinium vs tiotropium on day 1 for all of the normalized AUC values of FEV(1) as well as on day 15 for FEV(1) AUC(12-24/12h) (P.05 for all). COPD symptoms were significantly improved from baseline with aclidinium vs placebo (P.05) but not with tiotropium.In patients with COPD, aclidinium 400 μg bid compared with placebo provided clinically meaningful improvements in 24-h bronchodilation that generally were comparable to tiotropium 18 μg daily but with significant differences in favor of aclidinium observed in the average nighttime period. Larger studies with longer treatment duration are ongoing to confirm the efficacy of aclidinium 400 μg bid on bronchodilation and COPD symptoms.ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00868231; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Background: Aclidinium bromide/formoterol fumarate fixed-dose combination (FDC) twice daily (BID) is licensed in Europe for COPD treatment. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of aclidinium/formoterol vs salmeterol/fluticasone propionate FDC (SAL/FLU) in patients (pts) with COPD. Methods: A randomised, double-blind, Phase IIIb, 24-week study in pts with COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score ≥10 compared aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 µg BID via Genuair® with SAL/FLU 50/500 µg BID via Accuhaler® ([NCT01908140][1]). Endpoints were peak FEV1 (primary), Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI; secondary), CAT, device preference and exacerbations. Non-inferiority of aclidinium/formoterol vs SAL/FLU was tested for peak FEV1 and TDI. Superiority in peak FEV1 was also analysed. Results: 933 pts were randomised: mean age 63.4 years; 65.1% male; mean post-bronchodilator FEV1 1.48 L (53.2% predicted); mean CAT score 18.5. 788 pts (84.5%) completed the study. Aclidinium/formoterol achieved greater peak FEV1 vs SAL/FLU from Day 1 to Week 24 (p

Aclidinium statistically improved symptoms, and sleep and physical activity in moderate COPD http://ow.ly/2chV30adLbW

INTRODUCTION: The coexistence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) is frequent and might be inter-related through inflammation-related processes reflected by specific markers. Here, we studied angiopoietin-like protein 4 (ANGPTL4), an upcoming cardiovascular marker, in stable COPD, and its relationship to cardiovascular function with respect to well-known CVD risk factors. METHODS: In a prospective COPD cohort study, we investigated serum ANGPTL4 levels, vascular status (ankle-brachial index (ABI)) and cardiac function (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)) as well as airflow limitation, objectively measured physical activity, the metabolic syndrome, high-sensitive C reactive protein (hs-CRP) and other CVD risk factors at 2 time points. We initially studied 74 stable COPD patients and 18 controls. For internal validation, we additionally studied 160 COPD patients of a former visit. RESULTS: ANGPTL4 was significantly elevated in COPD patients compared with controls (p=0.026). After correction for traditional CVD risk factors, including hs-CRP, higher levels of ANGPTL4 were independently associated with lower ABI (p=0.023) and higher NT-proBNP (p

Interlobar fissure integrity has previously correlated with responsiveness to endobronchial lung volume reduction therapy in patients with advanced emphysema.This report summarises the effect of interlobar fissure integrity on responses to treatment with a novel endoscopic tissue sealant (AeriSeal emphysematous lung sealant (ELS)) that collapses hyperinflated lung.Fissure status, lung volumes, tissue density and disease heterogeneity were assessed radiographically in 28 patients (age 63.4±6.1 years, 20 men) with advanced upper lobe predominant emphysema (density=888.0±18.2 HU; upper lobe tissue density-950 = 2.62±1.74). Post-treatment changes in lobar volume, pulmonary function, exercise capacity, symptoms and quality of life were compared in patients with complete fissures (CFs) and incomplete fissures (ICFs).ELS therapy reduced lung volumes independent of interlobar fissure integrity. In patients with upper lobe emphysema and CFs, lobar volume reduction was 214±127 ml/treatment compared with 256±175 ml/treatment in those with ICFs (p=0.453). Reductions in gas trapping and improvements in spirometry, functional capacity and quality of life were similar in patients with CFs and ICFs. Stepwise multiple regression modelling confirmed that fissure integrity did not contribute to post-treatment changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 s, residual volume/total lung capacity ratio or lobar volume measured by CT analysis.Interlobar fissure integrity, an important determinant of responsiveness to endobronchial lung volume reduction therapy in prior studies, had minimal impact on physiological and functional responses to ELS therapy in patients with severe upper lobe predominant emphysema.Registration numbers for trials contributing to datasets in this report: NCT00884962, NCT01051258 and NCT01181466.

Introduction QMF149 is an investigational inhaled fixed-dose combination of indacaterol acetate and mometasone furoate via the Breezhaler ® device for once daily maintenance treatment of asthma and COPD. This double-blind, 12-week study compared QMF149 (150/160μg) o.d. with salmeterol 50µg/fluticasone 500µg, (Seretide ® ; SFC) b.i.d. in patients with moderate to very severe COPD. Objectives Primary objective of the study was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of QMF149 vs SFC in terms of trough FEV 1 at Week 12. Main secondary objectives were to compare the efficacy of QMF149 vs SFC in terms of dyspnoea via Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI), health status via St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), rescue medication, exacerbations and safety during the treatment period. Results 629 patients (mean FEV 1 46.51% predicted, QMF149 n = 316; SFC n = 313) were randomised. The primary objective was met. QMF149 showed significant improvement in trough FEV 1 vs SFC (LSM treatment difference [LSMTD] 56mL; p Conclusion When compared with SFC, QMF149 significantly improves trough FEV 1 and dyspnoea, reduces exacerbations and rescue medication use in patients with moderate to very severe COPD.

Background Two replicate, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 6-week crossover studies assessed the effect of the once-daily long-acting β2-agonist olodaterol 5 μg and 10 μg on constant work-rate cycle endurance in patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Methods Patients received placebo, olodaterol 5 μg once daily (QD) and olodaterol 10 μg QD in a randomised order for 6 weeks each, with a 2-week washout period in between. The primary end point was change in endurance time during constant work-rate cycle ergometry to symptom limitation at 75 % maximal work capacity after 6 weeks of treatment (2 h post-dose), based on log10-transformed data. Key secondary end points were inspiratory capacity at isotime and intensity of breathing discomfort at isotime. Results 151 and 157 patients were randomised and treated in Studies 1222.37 and 1222.38, respectively, with 147 and 154 being included in the full analysis sets. Mean endurance time at week 6 was increased compared to placebo by 14.0 % (Study 1222.37; p