Andrea C. Solomon, Kevin Duff, Douglas R. Langbehn, K.B. Whitlock, Noelle E. Carlozzi, Kevin M. Biglan, Julie C. Stout, Leigh J. Beglinger, Jane S. Paulsen, Elizabeth Aylward, J. Colin Campbell, Shannon A. Johnson, and Sarah Queller
Huntington disease (HD) is a progressive, fatal, autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disease that primarily affects movement, cognition, and psychiatric functions. Diagnosis of HD is based on the presence of unequivocal motor signs of HD, in conjunction with a positive genetic test for the HD CAG expansion or a confirmed family history of HD. Most people with the HD gene appear healthy throughout their youth and early adulthood, and then gradually develop signs and symptoms of HD, often leading to a diagnosis in middle age. The age of diagnosis varies in accordance with the number of CAG repeats on the expanded allele, although there is also substantial individual variability not accounted for by this genetic factor (Andrew et al., 1993; Gusella, MacDonald, Ambrose, & Duyao, 1993). A growing community of researchers is directing efforts at finding treatments to delay onset or slow the progression of early pathological changes in an attempt to reduce the tremendous personal and social costs of HD. Finding effective therapeutic or preventive treatments for HD depends critically on the ability to reliably and sensitively measure clinical signs of disease. Cognitive measures have excellent potential both for identifying individuals beginning to show subtle signs prior to the diagnosis of HD who might be suitable for clinical trials, and as sensitive outcome measures in HD trials. Cognition is an important target for therapeutic trials because even subtle cognitive changes can affect functional abilities like work performance, driving, and financial management. Cognition is actively studied in the HD prodrome, with more than 150 empirical reports of neurocognitive function published since the genetic mutation for HD was identified in 1993. In early studies, the evidence of cognitive dysfunction was inconsistent. But more recent, adequately powered studies have revealed that people with the HD prodrome have poorer performance on measures of attention, working memory, processing speed, psychomotor functions, episodic memory, emotion processing, sensory-perceptual functions, and executive functions (Johnson et al., 2007; Kirkwood et al., 2000; Paulsen et al., 2006a; Paulsen et al., 2008; Paulsen et al., 2001; Pirogovsky et al., 2007; e.g., Stout et al., 2007). The use of cognitive measures in clinical trials requires a substantial knowledge base, indicating when in the HD prodrome cognitive changes can be reliably detected, and which measures show adequate sensitivity. The PREDICT-HD study was designed to address these questions. PREDICT-HD is a 31-site international study of potential clinical and biological markers of HD in individuals with the CAG-expansion for HD, but who did not meet criteria based on motor impairment for diagnosis at the time of enrolment. The PREDICT-HD cohort is large, with more than 700 non-diagnosed CAG-expanded (prodromal) participants. For each participant, age-conditioned estimates of time to onset of motor disease were derived using a survival analysis regression equation based on CAG repeat length (Langbehn et al., 2004). Estimated time to motor disease onset in the sample varies from 5 to 25 years. The size and diversity of this sample makes it possible to stratify participants based on their estimated proximities to diagnosis, allowing an estimation of when, in the extended period leading up to HD diagnosis, cognitive signs can be detected, and which cognitive measures appear to have the most promise for detecting change in longitudinal studies. We report findings based on three stratified prodromal HD groups, a far from diagnosis group (FAR) estimated to be more than 15 years from diagnosis, a middle group, estimated to be between 9 and 15 years from diagnosis (MID), and a near diagnosis group, estimated to be less than 9 years from diagnosis (NEAR). For each of these groups compared to controls, we computed effect sizes for individual cognitive measures, allowing a direct comparison of all the tasks in our cognitive assessment. This allows a determination of which tasks are most adversely affected during the HD prodrome, and an upper-limit estimate of how early in the prodromal phase significant effects could be detected (Paulsen et al., 2008). Additionally, we examined the associations between cognitive findings and results of the clinical motor examination, which also reveals subtle signs prior to diagnosis (Biglan et al., 2009). Thus, this study provides a comprehensive depiction of the cognitive prodrome for HD.