1. Poly- Versus Mono-Energetic Dual-Spectrum Non-Intrusive Inspection of Cargo Containers
- Author
-
S. M. Glenn, Harry E. Martz, Jerel A. Smith, C. Divin, and Stephen G. Azevedo
- Subjects
Physics ,Nuclear and High Energy Physics ,Photon ,010308 nuclear & particles physics ,business.industry ,Detector ,Gamma ray ,chemistry.chemical_element ,Flux ,Tungsten ,01 natural sciences ,Optics ,Nuclear Energy and Engineering ,chemistry ,0103 physical sciences ,Electromagnetic shielding ,Electrical and Electronic Engineering ,Photonics ,010306 general physics ,Tin ,business - Abstract
In this paper, based on an invited talk at SORMA (May 2016), we present an overview of x-ray sources, detectors and system configurations for non-intrusive inspection (NII) of cargo containers. Our emphasis is on dual-energy x-ray NII for detecting high-atomic-number ( $\text {Z}\geq 72$ ) materials such as tungsten shielding and special nuclear materials (SNM). Standard single-energy (MeV and above) x-rays needed to penetrate and image cargo provide little SNM contrast, whereas dual-energy x-ray NII is demonstrated as a way to improve the selectivity of materials with Z $\text {Z}\geq 72$ . For two possible dual-energy x-ray source technologies—polyenergetic dual-energy (PDE) and quasi-monoenergetic x-ray sources (QMXS)—we investigate their trade-offs and future prospects using experimental and simulated results. The reduced scatter and larger separation of low- and high-energy photons provided by QMXS offers improved high-Z material contrast, but practical considerations such as flux and pulse rate need to be solved before making a deployable system. Straight-ray simulations show factor of four increases in contrast for QMXS over PDE scans of tin (Z=50) and iron (Z=26) relative to a uranium plate (Z=92) behind 20 cm of iron simulated cargo.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF