Search

Background: Transcranial magnetic stimulation-electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) has demonstrated decreased excitability in the primary motor cortex (M1) and increased excitability in the pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA) in moderate-advanced Parkinson's disease (PD)., Objectives: The aim was to investigate whether these abnormalities are evident from the early stages of the disease, their behavioral correlates, and relationship to cortico-subcortical connections., Methods: Twenty-eight early, drug-naive (de novo) PD patients and 28 healthy controls (HCs) underwent TMS-EEG to record TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) from the primary motor cortex (M1) and the pre-SMA, kinematic recording of finger-tapping movements, and a 3T-MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) scan to obtain diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) reconstruction of white matter (WM) tracts connecting M1 to the ventral lateral anterior thalamic nucleus and pre-SMA to the anterior putamen., Results: We found reduced M1 TEP P30 amplitude in de novo PD patients compared to HCs and similar pre-SMA TEP N40 amplitude between groups. PD patients exhibited smaller amplitude and slower velocity in finger-tapping movements and altered structural integrity in WM tracts of interest, although these changes did not correlate with TEPs., Conclusions: M1 hypoexcitability is a characteristic of PD from early phases and may be a marker of the parkinsonian state. Pre-SMA hyperexcitability is not evident in early PD and possibly emerges at later stages of the disease. © 2024 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society., (© 2024 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.)

Objective: To investigate the neuronal elements involved in the activation of corticospinal neurons in the primary motor cortex (M1)., Methods: We studied 10 healthy subjects. Cortical evoked potentials with different components induced by monophasic transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in anterior-posterior and posterior-anterior currents recorded with electroencephalography (EEG) were analyzed., Results: EEG signatures with P25 and N45 components recorded at the C3 electrode with posterior-anterior current were larger than those with anterior-posterior current, while the signatures with P180 and N280 components recorded at the FC1 electrode with anterior-posterior current were larger than those with posterior-anterior current. The source localization analysis revealed that the cortical evoked potential with anterior-posterior current distributed both in the M1 and premotor cortex while that with posterior-anterior current only located in the M1., Conclusions: We conclude that the activation of corticospinal pyramidal neurons in the M1 is affected by various neuronal elements including the local intracortical circuits in the M1 and inputs from premotor cortex with different sensitivities to TMS in opposite current directions., Significance: Our finding helped answer a longstanding question about how the corticospinal pathway from the M1 is functionally organized and activated., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Motor impairment in Parkinson's disease (PD) reflects changes in the basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuit converging on the primary motor cortex (M1) and supplementary motor area (SMA). Previous studies assessed M1 excitability in PD using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-evoked electromyographic activity. TMS-evoked electroencephalographic activity may unveil broader motor cortical network changes in PD., Objective: The aim was to assess motor cortical network excitability in PD., Methods: We compared TMS-evoked cortical potentials (TEPs) from M1 and the pre-SMA between 20 PD patients tested off and on medication and 19 healthy controls (HCs) and investigated possible correlations with bradykinesia., Results: Off PD patients compared to HCs had smaller P30 responses from the M1s contralateral (M1+) and ipsilateral (M1-) to the most bradykinetic side and increased pre-SMA N40. Dopaminergic therapy normalized the amplitude of M1+ and M1- P30 as well as pre-SMA N40. We found a positive correlation between M1+ P30 amplitude and bradykinesia in off PD patients., Conclusions: Changes in M1 P30 and pre-SMA N40 in PD suggest that M1 excitability is reduced on both sides, whereas pre-SMA excitability is increased. The effect of dopaminergic therapy and the clinical correlation suggest that these cortical changes may reflect abnormal basal ganglia-thalamocortical activity. TMS electroencephalography provides novel insight into motor cortical network changes related to the pathophysiology of PD. © 2022 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society., (© 2022 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.)

Background: Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and rest tremor may also have tremor during posture holding, with tremor being transiently suppressed during the transition between resting and posture holding. Other PD patients show no tremor suppression between resting and posture holding. The mechanisms responsible for tremor suppression in PD are unknown. Understanding the mechanisms of tremor suppression would expand our knowledge of tremor pathophysiology in PD., Objective: To investigate whether tremor suppression reflects the activity of the primary motor cortex (M1) and assess whether tremor features are different in patients with and without tremor suppression., Methods: We compared corticomuscular coherence (CMC) at tremor frequency and transcranial magnetic stimulation tremor resetting between 10 PD patients with tremor suppression and 10 patients without suppression. We also compared tremor spectral features between the two groups., Results: Patients with tremor suppression had higher CMC at tremor frequency during both rest tremor and postural tremor, and a higher postural tremor resetting index and stability when compared with patients without tremor suppression. Rest tremor frequency was similar between the two groups, but postural tremor frequency was lower in patients with tremor suppression as compared to patients without., Conclusion: M1 plays a major role in tremor suppression in PD, and the mechanisms of postural tremor may differ between patients with and without tremor suppression.

Objective: To test the hypothesis that intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) variability depends on the ability to engage specific neurons in the primary motor cortex (M1)., Methods: In a sham-controlled interventional study on 31 healthy volunteers, we used concomitant transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG). We compared baseline motor evoked potentials (MEPs), M1 iTBS-evoked EEG oscillations, and resting-state EEG (rsEEG) between subjects who did and did not show MEP facilitation following iTBS. We also investigated whether baseline MEP and iTBS-evoked EEG oscillations could explain inter and intraindividual variability in iTBS aftereffects., Results: The facilitation group had smaller baseline MEPs than the no-facilitation group and showed more iTBS-evoked EEG oscillation synchronization in the alpha and beta frequency bands. Resting-state EEG power was similar between groups and iTBS had a similar non-significant effect on rsEEG in both groups. Baseline MEP amplitude and beta iTBS-evoked EEG oscillation power explained both inter and intraindividual variability in MEP modulation following iTBS., Conclusions: The results show that variability in iTBS-associated plasticity depends on baseline corticospinal excitability and on the ability of iTBS to engage M1 beta oscillations., Significance: These observations can be used to optimize iTBS investigational and therapeutic applications., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2021 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Neuroimaging technology is being developed to enable non-invasive mapping of the latency distribution of cortical projection pathways in white matter, and correlative clinical neurophysiological techniques would be valuable for mutual verification. Interhemispheric interaction through the corpus callosum can be measured with interhemispheric facilitation and inhibition using transcranial magnetic stimulation., Objective: To develop a method for determining the latency distribution of the transcallosal fibers with transcranial magnetic stimulation., Methods: We measured the precise time courses of interhemispheric facilitation and inhibition with a conditioning-test paired-pulse magnetic stimulation paradigm. The conditioning stimulus was applied to the right primary motor cortex and the test stimulus was applied to the left primary motor cortex. The interstimulus interval was set at 0.1 ms resolution. The proportions of transcallosal fibers with different conduction velocities were calculated by measuring the changes in magnitudes of interhemispheric facilitation and inhibition with interstimulus interval., Results: Both interhemispheric facilitation and inhibition increased with increment in interstimulus interval. The magnitude of interhemispheric facilitation was correlated with that of interhemispheric inhibition. The latency distribution of transcallosal fibers measured with interhemispheric facilitation was also correlated with that measured with interhemispheric inhibition., Conclusions: The data can be interpreted as latency distribution of transcallosal fibers. Interhemispheric interaction measured with transcranial magnetic stimulation is a promising technique to determine the latency distribution of the transcallosal fibers. Similar techniques could be developed for other cortical pathways., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors declare no conflict of interest. We further confirm that all subjects provided written informed consent and any aspect of the work covered in this study (clinical protocol, Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT03223636) that has involved human subjects has been conducted with the ethical approval of the Combined NeuroScience Institutional Review Board at the National Institutes of Health., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Parkinson's disease patients may show a tremor that appears after a variable delay while the arms are kept outstretched (re-emergent tremor). The objectives of this study were to investigate re-emergent tremor pathophysiology by studying the role of the primary motor cortex in this tremor and making a comparison with rest tremor., Methods: We enrolled 10 Parkinson's disease patients with both re-emergent and rest tremor. Tremor was assessed by spectral analysis, corticomuscular coherence and tremor-resetting produced by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the primary motor cortex. We also recorded transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked potentials generated by motor cortex stimulation during rest tremor, tremor suppression during wrist extension, and re-emergent tremor. Spectral analysis, corticomuscular coherence, and tremor resetting were compared between re-emergent tremor and rest tremor., Results: Re-emergent tremor showed significant corticomuscular coherence, causal relation between motor cortex activity and tremor muscle and tremor resetting. The P60 component of transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked potentials reduced in amplitude during tremor suppression, recovered before re-emergent tremor, was facilitated at re-emergent tremor onset, and returned to values similar to those of rest tremor during re-emergent tremor. Compared with rest tremor, re-emergent tremor showed similar corticomuscular coherence and tremor resetting, but slightly higher frequency., Conclusions: Re-emergent tremor is causally related with the activity of the primary motor cortex, which is likely a convergence node in the network that generates re-emergent tremor. Re-emergent tremor and rest tremor share common pathophysiological mechanisms in which the motor cortex plays a crucial role. © 2020 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society., (© 2020 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.)

Background: Motor surround inhibition (mSI) is a phenomenon supportive for executing selective finger movements, wherein synergist muscles are selectively facilitated while surround muscles are inhibited. Previous studies of conditioning inputs to several intracortical and cortico-cortical inhibitory networks did not show an influence on mSI. The inhibitory posterior parietal-motor network, which is crucial for executing fine movements, however, has not been studied., Objective/hypothesis: To investigate the role of inhibitory posterior parietal-motor network in mSI. We hypothesized that conditioning this inhibitory network would enhance mSI., Methods: 11 healthy adults completed study. mSI was elicited by applying a TMS pulse over the motor cortex coupled with or without a conditioning input to an inhibitory spot in the posterior parietal cortex at 2 or 4 ms interval., Results: Conditioning input to the posterior parietal cortex increased mSI by ∼20% CONCLUSION: The inhibitory posterior parietal-motor network appears to contribute to the genesis of mSI., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None of the authors have potential conflicts of interest to be disclosed., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)