Back to Search Start Over

Cortical mechanisms underlying variability in intermittent theta-burst stimulation-induced plasticity: A TMS-EEG study.

Authors :
Leodori G
Fabbrini A
De Bartolo MI
Costanzo M
Asci F
Palma V
Belvisi D
Conte A
Berardelli A
Source :
Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology [Clin Neurophysiol] 2021 Oct; Vol. 132 (10), pp. 2519-2531. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jul 24.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Objective: To test the hypothesis that intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) variability depends on the ability to engage specific neurons in the primary motor cortex (M1).<br />Methods: In a sham-controlled interventional study on 31 healthy volunteers, we used concomitant transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG). We compared baseline motor evoked potentials (MEPs), M1 iTBS-evoked EEG oscillations, and resting-state EEG (rsEEG) between subjects who did and did not show MEP facilitation following iTBS. We also investigated whether baseline MEP and iTBS-evoked EEG oscillations could explain inter and intraindividual variability in iTBS aftereffects.<br />Results: The facilitation group had smaller baseline MEPs than the no-facilitation group and showed more iTBS-evoked EEG oscillation synchronization in the alpha and beta frequency bands. Resting-state EEG power was similar between groups and iTBS had a similar non-significant effect on rsEEG in both groups. Baseline MEP amplitude and beta iTBS-evoked EEG oscillation power explained both inter and intraindividual variability in MEP modulation following iTBS.<br />Conclusions: The results show that variability in iTBS-associated plasticity depends on baseline corticospinal excitability and on the ability of iTBS to engage M1 beta oscillations.<br />Significance: These observations can be used to optimize iTBS investigational and therapeutic applications.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1872-8952
Volume :
132
Issue :
10
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34454281
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2021.06.021