1. Potential of Medical Management to Mitigate Suction Events in Ventricular Assist Device Patients
- Author
-
Bart Meyns, Maria Rocchi, Steven Jacobs, Libera Fresiello, Dieter Dauwe, and Walter Droogne
- Subjects
Suction (medicine) ,Tachycardia ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Hypovolemia ,Biomedical Engineering ,Biophysics ,Hemodynamics ,Bioengineering ,Blood volume ,Suction ,Biomaterials ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Heart Failure ,business.industry ,Models, Cardiovascular ,Dilated cardiomyopathy ,General Medicine ,medicine.disease ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Ventricular assist device ,cardiovascular system ,Vascular resistance ,Cardiology ,Heart-Assist Devices ,Hypotension ,medicine.symptom ,business - Abstract
Ventricular suction is a common adverse event in ventricular assist device (VAD) patients and can be due to multiple underlying causes. The aim of this study is to analyze the potential of different therapeutic interventions to mitigate suction events induced by different pathophysiological conditions. To do so, a suction module was embedded in a cardiovascular hybrid (hydraulic-computational) simulator reproducing the entire cardiovascular system. An HVAD system (Medtronic) was connected between a compliant ventricular apex and a simulated aorta. Starting from a patient profile with severe dilated cardiomyopathy, four different pathophysiological conditions leading to suction were simulated: hypovolemia (blood volume: -900 ml), right ventricular failure (contractility -70%), hypotension (systemic vascular resistance: 8.3 Wood Units), and tachycardia (heart rate:185 bpm). Different therapeutic interventions such as volume infusion, ventricular contractility increase, vasoconstriction, heart rate increase, and pump speed reduction were simulated. Their effects were compared in terms of general hemodynamics and suction mitigation. Each intervention elicited a different effect on the hemodynamics for every pathophysiological condition. Pump speed reduction mitigated suction but did not ameliorate the hemodynamics. Administering volume and inducing a systemic vasoconstriction were the most efficient interventions in both improving the hemodynamics and mitigating suction. When simulating volume infusion, the cardiac powers increased, respectively, by 38%, 25%, 42%, and 43% in the case of hypovolemia, right ventricular failure, hypotension, and tachycardia. Finally, a management algorithm is proposed to identify a therapeutic intervention suited for the underlying physiologic condition causing suction.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF