(ProQuest: ... denotes non-US-ASCII text omitted.)John W. M. Krummel, Nishida Kitaro's Chiasmatic Chorology: Place of Dialectic and Dialectic of Place Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2015. 314 pages. Hardcover, $60.00. isbn 978-0-253-01753-6.The present volume is an inspiring analysis of Nishida Kitaro's ... dialectics, the philosophical method developed and employed by the founder of the socalled Kyoto School. It is easily one of the three most important English-language works on this pivotal philosopher and joins the ranks of James W. Heisig's Philosophers of Nothingness (2001) and Michiko Yusa's Zen and Philosophy: An Intellectual Biography of Nishida Kitaro (2002) as the must-read commentaries on a philosopher who pioneered the practice and discipline of comparative philosophy and whose significance for philosophy in general is increasingly being recognized around the world.1 What makes Krummel's work stand out is that on the one hand, he focuses on Nishida's philosophical method, and on the other explores it's relevance at the intersection of Continental and Buddhist philosophies.Krummel approaches the task of illuminating Nishida's "enigmatic assertions regarding 'contradictory self-identity,' 'inverse correspondence,' 'continuity of discontinuity" and 'self-negation,' which seem to shamelessly defy any allegiance to the logical law of non-contradiction" (1) in three steps: Part I, "Preliminary Studies" locates Nishida's philosophy at the intersection of Continental and Buddhist philosophies; Part II, "Dialectics in Nishida" traces the development of Nishida's philosophical method throughout his life work; and Part III, " Conclusions," attempts an interpretation of Nishida's philosophical method and system that is "original and challenging" (141). In all three sections, Krummel takes utmost pains to stay on the difficult path between the Scylla of repeating Nishida's enigmatic phrases without adding any interpretation or commentary and the Charybdis of venturing too far from the text to superimpose one's own philosophical beliefs every interpreter of Nishida is more than familiar with.In Part I, Krummel succeeds in locating Nishida's project in its proper historical context and identifying "a 'Buddhist metaphysic,' reformulated in the language of Western philosophy, hidden within Nishida's formulations" (165). Anyone familiar with Nishida knows that this claim is both appealing and problematic at the same time. On the one hand, Nishida clearly responds to philosophical problems and questions as formulated in Neo-Kantianism, and "Nishida's texts in general, except for his last few essays are short on any direct references to traditional Buddhist sources" (36). On the other hand, quite a few of his later conceptual constructions seem to reverberate Buddhist insights to varying degrees.While he attempted to overcome the Kantian dualism, as he himself professed in his Intuition and Reflection in Self-Consciousness (Jikaku ni okeru chokkan to hansei , ... NKZ 2) , Nishida did so in his later work by suggesting a middle path between Aristotle's "substance" and Plato's "forms" in his Fundamental Problems of Philosophy (Tetsugaku no konpon mondai ... NKZ 7) and between Spinoza's monism and Leibniz's monadology in Philosophical Essays Vol. 5 (Tetsugaku ronbunshu ... NKZ 10: 339-565). Krummel seeks the origin of Nishida's philosophy in Nishida's response to "Aristotle's substantialism" and "NeoKantian dualism" as well as in Hegel's dialectical philosophy. It is clearly in the latter that Nishida found his inspiration.In chapter 2, Krummel examines the ways in which the philosophies of Madhyamaka, Yogacara, Tiantai, Huayan, and Chan/Zen Buddhist philosophers as well as D. T. Suzuki's reading of the Diamond Sutra have responded to dualism and substantialism. He focuses specifically on the concepts of "emptiness" (sunyata), the "three natures" (trisvabhava), the "three truths" (sandi . …