Search

Background: Studies have reported that female sex predicts superior cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response. One theory is that this association is related to smaller female heart size, thus increased relative dyssynchrony at a given QRS duration (QRSd). Our objective was to investigate the mechanisms of sex-specific CRT response relating to heart size, relative dyssynchrony, cardiomyopathy type, QRS morphology, and other patient characteristics., Methods and Results: This is a post hoc analysis of the MORE-CRT MPP (More Response on Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with Multipoint Pacing)  trial (n=3739, 28% women), with a subgroup analysis of patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and left bundle-branch block (n=1308, 41% women) to control for confounding characteristics. A multivariable analysis examined predictors of response to 6 months of conventional CRT, including sex and relative dyssynchrony, measured by QRSd/left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV). Women had a higher CRT response rate than men (70.1% versus 56.8%, P <0.0001). In subgroup analysis, regression analysis of the nonischemic cardiomyopathy left bundle-branch block subgroup identified QRSd/LVEDV, but not sex, as a modifier of CRT response ( P <0.0039). QRSd/LVEDV was significantly higher in women (0.919) versus men (0.708, P <0.001). CRT response was 78% for female patients with QRSd/LVEDV greater than the median value, compared with 68% with QRSd/LVEDV less than the median value ( P =0.012). The association between CRT response and QRSd/LVEDV was strongest at QRSd <150 ms., Conclusions: In the nonischemic cardiomyopathy left bundle-branch block population, increased relative dyssynchrony in women, who have smaller heart sizes than their male counterparts, is a driver of sex-specific CRT response, particularly at QRSd <150 ms. Women may benefit from CRT at a QRSd <130 ms, opening the debate on whether sex-specific QRSd cutoffs or QRS/LVEDV measurement should be incorporated into clinical guidelines.

Background: Height, left ventricular (LV) size, and sex were proposed as additional criteria for patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) but their connections with the QRS complex in left bundle branch block (LBBB) are little investigated. We evaluated these., Methods: Among patients with "true" LBBB, QRS duration (QRSd) and amplitude, and LV hypertrophy indices, were correlated with patient's height and LV mass, and compared between sexes., Results: In this study cohort (n = 220; 60 ± 12 years; left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 21 ± 7%; mostly New York Heart Association II-III, QRSd 165 ± 19 ms; 57% female; 70% responders [LVEF increased ≥5%]), LV mass was increased in all patients. QRS amplitude did not correlate with LV mass or height in any individual lead or with Sokolow-Lyon or Cornell-Lyon indices. QRSd did not correlate with height. In contrast, QRSd correlated strongly with LV mass (r = .51). CRT response rate was greater in women versus men (84% vs. 58%, p < .001) despite shorter QRSd [7% shorter (p < .0001)]. QRSd normalized for height resulted in a 2.7% and for LV mass 24% greater index in women., Conclusion: True LBBB criteria do not exclude HF patients with increased LV mass. QRS amplitudes do not correlate with height or LV mass. Height does not affect QRSd. However, QRSd correlates with LV size. QRSd normalized for LV mass results in 24% greater value in women in the direction of sex-specific responses. LV mass may be a significant nonelectrical modifier of QRSd for CRT., (© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Continuous automatic optimisation of cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT), stimulating only the left ventricle to fuse with intrinsic right bundle conduction (synchronised left ventricular stimulation), might offer better outcomes than conventional CRT in patients with heart failure, left bundle branch block, and normal atrioventricular conduction. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes of adaptive CRT versus conventional CRT in patients with heart failure with intact atrioventricular conduction and left bundle branch block., Methods: This global, prospective, randomised controlled trial was done in 227 hospitals in 27 countries across Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with class 2-4 heart failure, an ejection fraction of 35% or less, left bundle branch block with QRS duration of 140 ms or more (male patients) or 130 ms or more (female patients), and a baseline PR interval 200 ms or less. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via block permutation to adaptive CRT (an algorithm providing synchronised left ventricular stimulation) or conventional biventricular CRT using a device programmer. All patients received device programming but were masked until procedures were completed. Site staff were not masked to group assignment. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death or intervention for heart failure decompensation and was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety events were collected and reported in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02205359, and is closed to accrual., Findings: Between Aug 5, 2014, and Jan 31, 2019, of 3797 patients enrolled, 3617 (95·3%) were randomly assigned (1810 to adaptive CRT and 1807 to conventional CRT). The futility boundary was crossed at the third interim analysis on June 23, 2022, when the decision was made to stop the trial early. 1568 (43·4%) of 3617 patients were female and 2049 (56·6%) were male. Median follow-up was 59·0 months (IQR 45-72). A primary outcome event occurred in 430 of 1810 patients (Kaplan-Meier occurrence rate 23·5% [95% CI 21·3-25·5] at 60 months) in the adaptive CRT group and in 470 of 1807 patients (25·7% [23·5-27·8] at 60 months) in the conventional CRT group (hazard ratio 0·89, 95% CI 0·78-1·01; p=0·077). System-related adverse events were reported in 452 (25·0%) of 1810 patients in the adaptive CRT group and 440 (24·3%) of 1807 patients in the conventional CRT group., Interpretation: Compared with conventional CRT, adaptive CRT did not significantly reduce the incidence of all-cause death or intervention for heart failure decompensation in the included population of patients with heart failure, left bundle branch block, and intact AV conduction. Death and heart failure decompensation rates were low with both CRT therapies, suggesting a greater response to CRT occurred in this population than in patients in previous trials., Funding: Medtronic., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests BLW reports participating in physician advisory committees of Medtronic, Abbott, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, and Philips, and receiving honoraria from Medtronic, Abbott, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Philips, and Cook. GF reports receiving lecture fees, participating in committees of trials sponsored by Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Servier, Vifor, Impulse Dynamics, and Medtronic, and receiving research grants from the European Union. CL reports participating in a Medtronic advisory board and receiving honoraria from Medtronic, Biotronik, LivaNova, Boston Scientific, and Abbott. MRG reports being a consultant for Medtronic and Boston Scientific and receiving honoraria from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and EBR Systems. KK reports receiving speaker's honoraria and research grants from Medtronic Japan and Biotronik Japan. GMF reports receiving research grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, American Heart Association, Amgen, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Cytokinetics, and CSL-Behring, acting as a consultant for Novartis, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Cardionomic, Boehringer-Ingelheim, American Regent, Abbott, AstraZeneca, Regeneron, Reprieve, Myovant, Sequana, Windtree Therapuetics, Rocket Pharma, and Whiteswell, and serving on clinical endpoint committees or data safety monitoring boards for Amgen, Merck, Medtronic, EBR Systems, V-Wave, and LivaNova. MFE-C reports consultancy work for Medtronic and Boston Scientific. VE reports receiving support from a Clinical Research Scholar Award from the Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé (FRQS) and honoraria from Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. BP reports consultancy work for Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, and Microport, and receiving honoraria from Medtronic. FP reports receiving research grants from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Abbott. ESC reports consultancy work for Medtronic, Abbott, Intershunt, and Cardionomic, and serving on data safety monitoring boards and clinical events committees for LivaNova, EBR, and Abbott. BB reports consultancy work for Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Pfizer. HHE reports receiving research grants from Medtronic. NV reports consultancy work for Medtronic, Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, EP Solutions, Implicity, and Pacemate. JvW, BG, DES, and DHF report being employees of Medtronic. DB reports being a mid-career investigator (supported by the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario and the University of Ottawa Chair in Electrophysiology Research) and receiving research funding from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Biotronik, Pfizer, and Bristol Myers Squibb. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Cardiac physiologic pacing (CPP), encompassing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and conduction system pacing (CSP), has emerged as a pacing therapy strategy that may mitigate or prevent the development of heart failure (HF) in patients with ventricular dyssynchrony or pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. This clinical practice guideline is intended to provide guidance on indications for CRT for HF therapy and CPP in patients with pacemaker indications or HF, patient selection, pre-procedure evaluation and preparation, implant procedure management, follow-up evaluation and optimization of CPP response, and use in pediatric populations. Gaps in knowledge, pointing to new directions for future research, are also identified., (Copyright © 2023 The Heart Rhythm Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Pacing remote from the latest electrically activated site (LEAS) in the left ventricle (LV) may diminish response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We tested whether proximity of LV pacing site (LVPS) to LEAS, determined by non-invasive three-dimensional electrical activation mapping [electrocardiographic Imaging (ECGI)], increased likelihood of CRT response., Methods and Results: Consecutive CRT patients underwent ECGI and chest/heart computed tomography 6-24 months of post-implant. Latest electrically activated site and the distance to LVPS (dp) were assessed. Left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) reduction of ≥15% at clinical follow-up defined response. Logistic regression probabilistically modelled non-response; variables included demographics, heart failure classification, left bundle branch block (LBBB), ischaemic heart disease (IHD), atrial fibrillation, QRS duration, baseline ejection fraction (EF) and LVESV, comorbidities, use of CRT optimization algorithm, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor(ACE)/angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB), beta-blocker, diuretics, and dp. Of 111 studied patients [64 ± 11 years, EF 28 ± 6%, implant duration 12 ± 5 months (mean ± SD), 98% had LBBB, 38% IHD], 67% responded at 10 ± 3 months post CRT-implant. Latest electrically activated sites were outside the mid-to-basal lateral segments in 35% of the patients. dp was 42 ± 23 mm [31 ± 14 mm for responders vs. 63 ± 24 mm non-responders (P < 0.001)]. Longer dp and the lack of use of CRT optimization algorithm were the only independent predictors of non-response [area under the curve (AUC) 0.906]. dp of 47 mm delineated responders and non-responders (AUC 0.931)., Conclusion: The distance between LV pacing site and latest electrical activation is a strong independent predictor for CRT response. Non-invasive electrical evaluation to characterize intrinsic activation and guide LV lead deployment may improve CRT efficacy., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: N.V.—consulting fees/honoraria from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Medtronic, and Impulse Dynamics; A.A.—consultant to Boston Scientific, Cairdac, Corvia, Microport CRM, EP Solutions, EPD Philips, and Radcliffe Publishers; he received speaker fees from Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Microport; he participates in clinical trials sponsored by Boston Scientific, Medtronic, EPD Philips, and XSpline; and has intellectual properties with Boston Scientific, Biosense Webster, and Microport CRM; A.T.—shareholder, consultant, and recipient of the financial research support from EP Solutions and consulting fees/honoraria from Abbott, Biosense Webster, and Medtronic; F.L.—consultant and recipient of the financial research support from Medtronic, Abbott, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, and Microport. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, non-left bundle branch block, or QRS duration <150 ms have a lower response rate to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) than did other indicated patients. The ECG Belt system (EBS) is a novel surface mapping system designed to measure electrical dyssynchrony via the standard deviation of the activation times of the left ventricle., Objectives: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the efficacy of the EBS in patients less likely to respond to CRT and to determine whether EBS use in lead placement guidance and device programming was superior to standard CRT care., Methods: This was a prospective randomized trial of patients with heart failure and EBS-guided CRT implantation and programming vs standard CRT care. The primary end point was relative change in left ventricular end-systolic volume from baseline to 6 months postimplantation., Results: A total of 408 patients from centers in Europe and North America were randomized. Although both patients with EBS and control patients had a mean improvement in left ventricular end-systolic volume, there was no significant difference in relative change from baseline (P = .26). While patients with a higher baseline standard deviation of the activation times derived greater left ventricular reverse remodeling, improvement in electrical dyssynchrony did not correlate with the extent of reverse remodeling., Conclusion: The findings of the present study do not support EBS-guided therapy for CRT management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction., (Copyright © 2022 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Alert-driven remote patient monitoring (RPM) or fully virtual care without routine evaluations may reduce clinic workload and promote more efficient resource allocation, principally by diminishing nonactionable patient encounters., Objective: The purpose of this study was to conduct a cost-consequence analysis to compare 3 postimplant implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) follow-up strategies: (1) in-person evaluation (IPE) only; (2) RPM-conventional (hybrid of IPE and RPM); and (3) RPM-alert (alert-based ICD follow-up)., Methods: We constructed a decision-analytic Markov model to estimate the costs and benefits of the 3 strategies over a 2-year time horizon from the perspective of the US Medicare payer. Aggregate and patient-level data from the TRUST (Lumos-T Safely RedUceS RouTine Office Device Follow-up) randomized clinical trial informed clinical effectiveness model inputs. TRUST randomized 1339 patients 2:1 to conventional RPM or IPE alone, and found that RPM was safe and reduced the number of nonactionable encounters. Cost data were obtained from the published literature. The primary outcome was incremental cost., Results: Mean cumulative follow-up costs per patient were $12,688 in the IPE group, $12,001 in the RPM-conventional group, and $11,011 in the RPM-alert group. Compared to the IPE group, both the RPM-conventional and RPM-alert groups were associated with lower incremental costs of -$687 (95% confidence interval [CI] -$2138 to +$638) and -$1,677 (95% CI -$3134 to -$304), respectively. Therefore, the RPM-alert strategy was most cost-effective, with an estimated cost-savings in 99% of simulations., Conclusions: Alert-driven RPM was economically attractive and, if patient outcomes and safety are comparable to those of conventional RPM, may be the preferred strategy for ICD follow-up., (Copyright © 2022 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Among patients with heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), patients with a minimal change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) have recently been defined as "nonprogressors" rather than as "nonresponders." Little is known regarding long-term outcomes of nonprogressors., Objective: We sought to evaluate outcomes in patients undergoing CRT on the basis of echocardiographically determined response status., Methods: We reviewed the medical charts of patients with an LVEF of ≤35% and a QRS duration of ≥120 ms undergoing CRT at the Cleveland Clinic, Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center between 2003 and 2014. Response to CRT was defined on the basis of LVEF change as follows: super-responders ≥20%, responders 6%-19%, nonprogressors 0%-5%, and progressors <0%. Survival free of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation and heart transplantation was compared on the basis of response classification., Results: A total of 1058 patients were included and had a mean follow-up 8.7 ± 5.4 years, over which time there were 606 end points (37 LVAD implants, 32 heart transplants, and 537 deaths). Survival free of LVAD and heart transplant differed significantly between response groups after CRT both in the mid-term (4 years) and in the long-term (8.7 ± 5.4 years), with super-responders achieving the best outcomes and progressors the worst (P < .001). In multivariate analysis, nonprogressors had superior outcomes to progressors (P = .02) at 4 years of follow-up. Over the duration of follow-up (8.7 ± 5.4 years), there was no significant difference in survival between those 2 groups (P = .18)., Conclusion: Nonprogressors to CRT have superior medium-term outcomes but similar long-term outcomes to progressors and inferior outcomes to responders and super-responders., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Current cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implant guidelines emphasize the presence of electrical dyssynchrony (left bundle branch block (LBBB) and QRS > 150 ms) yet have modest predictive value for response and have not reduced the 30% nonresponse rate. Optimized programming to optimize CRT delivery has promised much but to date has largely been ineffective. What is missing is the understanding of LV paced effects (which are unpredictable) and optimal paced AV interval (that can be conserved during physiologic variations) that then can be incorporated into an individualized programming prescription. Automatic device-based algorithms that deliver electrical optimization and maintain this during ambulatory fluctuations in AV interval are discussed., Competing Interests: Disclosure Speaking and consulting fees from Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. ECGI studies sponsored by CardioInsight., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to test the hypotheses that cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) efficacy differed among Asians compared with non-Asian populations, differed between QRS duration (QRSd) ranges 120-149 and ≥150 ms, and was influenced by height in the multinational ADVANCE CRT trial., Background: CRT guidelines, derived from trials among U.S./European patients, assign weaker recommendations to those with midrange QRSd (QRSd <150 ms). Patient height may modulate CRT efficacy. Together, these may affect CRT prescription and efficacy in Asia., Methods: CRT response was assessed using the Clinical Composite Score 6 months postimplant (n = 934). Heart failure events and cardiac deaths were reported until 12 months. Asian and non-Asian patients were compared overall, by QRSd <150 ms (Asian n = 71 vs non-Asian n = 248), and QRSd ≥150 ms (Asian n = 180 vs non-Asian n = 435) and by height., Results: Asians comprised 27% (251 of 934) of the primary study population. More Asians had QRSd ≥150 ms (72% [180 of 251] vs 64% [435 of 683] in non-Asian patients; P = 0.022). Overall CRT response was better in Asians vs non-Asians (Clinical Composite Score 85% vs 65%; P <0.001), and following QRSd dichotomization (QRSd <150 ms: 80% vs 59%; P <0.001; QRS ≥150 ms: 86% vs 69%; P < 0.001). HF events and cardiac deaths were fewer in Asians irrespective of QRSd (P < 0.001). Stepwise multivariable analysis indicated that in group QRSd <150 ms, nonischemic cardiomyopathy, number of other comorbidities (0-1 vs ≥4), and atrial fibrillation influenced CRT response. The trend favoring Asian race (OR: 1.46; 95% CI: 0.72-2.95) was eliminated (OR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.47-2.11) when height or QRSd/height were included (QRSd/height P = 0.006; OR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.15-2.35). In QRSd <150 ms, probability of CRT response diminished as height increased, but increased with QRSd/height, in both Asians and non-Asians. In QRSd ≥150 ms, height or QRSd/height had minimal effect in Asians or non-Asians., Conclusions: Height modulates CRT efficacy among patients with QRSd <150 ms and contributes to high probability of benefit from CRT among Asians. CRT should be encouraged among Asian patients with midrange QRSd. (Advance Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy [CRT] Registry; NCT01805154)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This registry was funded by Abbott. Dr Varma has received consulting fees/honoraria from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Medtronic, and Impulse Dynamics. Dr Sethi has received research support from Abbott. Dr Kondo has received consulting fees/honoraria from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Bayer. Dr Joung has received research funds from Abbott and Medtronic. Dr Auricchio has served as a consultant for Boston Scientific, Backbeat, Biosense Webster, Cairdac, Corvia, EBR Systems, Microport CRM, Philips, and Radcliffe Publisher; has received speakers fees from Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Microport CRM; has participated in clinical trials for Boston Scientific, EBR System, Medtronic, and Philips; and has intellectual properties with Boston Scientific, Biosense Webster, Microport CRM, and Daiichi-Sankyo. Dr Singh has received consulting fees/honoraria from Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Abbott, Microport, EBR, Respicardia, Impulse Dynamics, BackBeat Inc., and Toray Inc. Dr Lee has received a salary from Abbott. Dr Gold has received consulting fees/honoraria from Abbott, EBR, Medtronic, and Boston Scientific. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy has been increasingly recognised as patients are living longer with more effective treatments for their malignancies. Anthracyclines are known to cause left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. While heart failure medications are frequently used, some patients may need consideration for device-based therapies such as cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT). However, the role of CRT in anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy (AIC) is not well understood., Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all patients undergoing CRT implantation at our centre from 2003 to 2019 with a diagnosis of AIC. The LV remodelling and survival outcomes of this population were obtained and then compared with consecutive patients with other aetiologies of non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM)., Results: A total of 34 patients underwent CRT implantation with a diagnosis of AIC with a mean age of 60.5±12.7 years, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 21.7%±7.4%, and 11.3±7.5 years and 10.2±7.4 years from cancer diagnosis and last anthracycline exposure, respectively. At 9.6±8.1 months after CRT implantation, there was an increase of LVEF from 21.8%±7.6% to 30.4%±13.0% (p<0.001). Patients whose LVEF increased by at least 10% post-CRT implant (42.5% of cohort) survived significantly longer than patients who failed to improve their LVEF by that amount (p=0.01). A propensity matched analysis between patients with AIC and 369 consecutive patients with other aetiologies of NICM who underwent CRT implantation during the same period revealed no significant differences in improvement in LVEF or long-term survival., Conclusions: Patients with AIC undergo LV remodelling with CRT at rates similar to other aetiologies of NICM. Furthermore, AIC post-CRT responders have a favourable long-term mortality compared with non-responders., Competing Interests: Competing interests: TC: consultant, Biotronik. KGT: consulting and honoraria from Medtronic and Spectranetics Corporation; advisory board, Medtronic and AliveCor. DC: consultant, Abbott and Boston Scientific. OW: Honoraria Spectranetics. NV: consultant/honoraria from St. Jude Medical, Boston Scientific, Biotronik and Medtronic. BLW: honoraria/consultant fees from Abbott, Medtronic and Philipps. JR: honoraria/consultant fees from Abbott and Medtronic. All other authors have no disclosures to report., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: This study hypothesized that the shorter intrinsic PR interval observed in women allows a greater degree of fusion with intrinsic conduction, achieving a shorter QRS interval duration and, thus, a better response., Background: Women benefit more from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) than men. However, the reason for this difference remains elusive., Methods: A cohort of 180 patients included in the BEST (Fusion based optimization in resynchronization therapy [ECG Optimization of CRT: Evaluation of Mid-Term Response]; NCT01439529) study were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were initially randomized to either nonoptimized CRT (NON-OPT group; n = 89) or electrocardiographically optimized CRT based on the fusion-optimized intervals (FOI) method (FOI group; n = 91). Echocardiographic response was defined as a >15% decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume at the 12-month follow-up., Results: The basal PR interval was shorter in women as compared to men. In the NON-OPT group, CRT resulted in a shorter paced QRS interval in women than in men (134 ± 21 ms vs. 151 ± 21 ms, respectively; p = 0.003, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -27 to -5.6) and better response in women than in men: 70.4% vs. 46.4%, respectively (odds ratio: 0.37; p = 0.04; 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.97). There were no differences in paced QRS interval duration (126 ± 13 ms vs. 129 ± 17 ms; p = 0.47) or response between women and men in the FOI group (68% vs. 70.5%; odds ratio: 1.12; p = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.41 to 3.07). FOI extended the atrioventricular interval to obtain the best fusion; the atrioventricular intervals tended to require greater extension in men than in women (22 ± 33 ms vs. 8 ± 28 ms, respectively; p = 0.07)., Conclusions: Women had a shorter PR interval, which was associated with a shorter QRS interval and better response to CRT. The difference in QRS interval duration and response between men and women did not persist when CRT was optimized using fusion with intrinsic conduction (FOI programming)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr. Pujol-López is funded by the Research Grant Josep Font 2019, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona. Dr. San Antonio is funded by a Jordi Soler Training Grant, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Cardiovasculares 2018. Dr. Tolosana has received honoraria as a lecturer and consultant for Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. Dr. Roca has received honoraria as a lecturer and consultant for Abbott and Biosense Webster. Dr. Varma has received honoraria as a lecturer and consultant for Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, EP Solutions, Medtronic, and Microport. Dr. Mont has received unrestricted research grants, fellowship program support, and honoraria as a lecturer and consultant from Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Livanova, and Medtronic. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: The aim of this study is to quantify healthcare resource utilization among non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-NR) by heart failure (HF) events and influence of comorbidities., Methods and Results: The ADVANCE CRT registry (2013-2015) prospectively identified responders/CRT-NRs 6 months post-implant using the clinical composite score. Heart failure event rates and associated cost, both overall and separated for inpatient hospitalizations, office visits, emergency room visits, and observational stays, were quantified. Costs of events were imputed from payments for similar real-world encounters in subjects with CRT-D/P devices in the MarketScan™ commercial and Medicare Supplemental insurance claims databases. Effects of patient demographics and comorbidities on event rates and cost were evaluated. Of 879 US patients (age 69 ± 11 years, 29% female, ischaemic disease 52%), 310 (35%) were CRT-NR. Among CRT-NRs vs. responders, more patients developed HF (41% vs. 11%, P < 0.001), HF event rate was higher (67.0 ± 21.7 vs. 11.4 ± 3.7/100 pt-year, P < 0.001), and HF readmission within 30 days was more common [hazard ratio 7.06, 95% confidence interval (2.1-43.7)]. Inpatient hospitalization was the most common and most expensive event type in CRT-NR. Comorbid HF was increased by diabetes, hypertension, and pulmonary disorders. Over 2 years, compared to CRT responders, each CRT-NR resulted in excess cost of $6388 ($3859-$10 483) to Medicare (P = 0.015) or $10 197 ($6161-$17 394) to private insurances (P = 0.014)., Conclusion: Healthcare expenditures associated with contemporary CRT non-response management are among the highest for any HF patient group. This illustrates an unmet need for interventions to improve HF outcomes and reduce costs among some CRT recipients., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2021. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Purpose: Multipoint pacing (MPP) improves left ventricular (LV) electrical synchrony in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). SyncAV automatically adjusts atrioventricular delay (AVD) according to intrinsic AV intervals and may further improve synchrony. Their combination has not been assessed. The objective was to evaluate the improvement in electrical synchrony achieved by SyncAV combined with MPP in an international, multicenter study., Methods: Patients with LBBB undergoing CRT implant with a quadripolar lead (Abbott Quartet™) were prospectively enrolled. QRS duration (QRSd) was measured by blinded observers from 12-lead ECG during: intrinsic conduction, BiV pacing (conventional biventricular pacing, nominal static AVD), MPP (2 LV cathodes maximally spaced, nominal static AVD), BiV + SyncAV, and MPP + SyncAV. All SyncAV offsets were individualized for each patient to yield the narrowest QRSd during BiV pacing. QRSd changes were compared by ANOVA and post hoc Tukey-Kramer tests., Results: One hundred and three patients were enrolled (65.7 ± 12.1 years, 67% male, 37% ischemic, EF 26.4 ± 6.5%, PR 190.3 ± 39.1 ms). Relative to intrinsic conduction (QRSd of 165 ± 16 ms), BiV reduced QRSd by 11.9% to 145 ± 18 ms (P < 0.001 vs intrinsic), and MPP reduced QRSd by 13.3% to 142 ± 19 ms (P < 0.001 vs intrinsic). However, enabling SyncAV with a patient-optimized offset nearly doubled this QRSd reduction. BiV + SyncAV reduced QRSd by 22.0% to 128 ± 13 ms (P < 0.001 vs BiV), while MPP + SyncAV reduced QRSd further by 25.6% to 122 ± 14 ms (P < 0.05 vs BiV + SyncAV)., Conclusion: SyncAV can significantly improve acute electrical synchrony beyond conventional CRT, with further improvement achieved by superimposing MPP., (© 2020. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Lower BiVentricular (BiV) pacing percentages have been associated with significantly worse survival in patients with chronic heart failure (HF). However, the pathophysiology behind this observation has not been further delineated. This analysis evaluated whether small incremental decreases in BiV pacing percentages were associated with worse measures, related to HF physiology using individual sensor trends and the HeartLogic composite index., Methods: Sensor data was obtained from 900 ambulatory HF patients with implanted CRT devices. The percent of cardiac cycles with BiV pacing was assessed for periods (median = 7.3 days) between data downloads (median = 55 periods/patient)., Results: The third heart sound (S3), respiration rate, RSBI, and night-time heart rate were significantly elevated with sub-optimal pacing (<98%), while the first heart sound (S1), thoracic impedance, and activity were significantly lower. All sensor changes were in the direction associated with worsening HF. While IN the HeartLogic alert state (threshold above an Index of 16) the odds of optimal BiV pacing (≥98%) were less than when OUT of the HeartLogic alert state for a given subject (OR: 0.655; 95% CI: 0.626-0.686; p < 0.0001). The percent BiV pacing was reduced and the HeartLogic Index was increased in the periods surrounding HFhospitalizations., Conclusion: Lower BiV pacing percent is associated with multiple sensor changes indicative of worsening HF, and patients in HeartLogic alert are more likely to have suboptimal BiV pacing. Collectively, these data provide strong evidence that even small decreases in BiV percent pacing can lead to worsening HF., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

[Figure: see text].

Background Patients with recurring heart failure (HF) following cardiac resynchronization therapy fare poorly. Their management is undecided. We tested remote hemodynamic-guided pharmacotherapy. Methods and Results We evaluated cardiac resynchronization therapy subjects included in the CHAMPION (CardioMEMS Heart Sensor Allows Monitoring of Pressure to Improve Outcomes in New York Heart Association Class III Heart Failure Patients) trial, which randomized patients with persistent New York Heart Association Class III symptoms and ≥1 HF hospitalization in the previous 12 months to remotely managed pulmonary artery (PA) pressure-guided management (treatment) or usual HF care (control). Diuretics and/or vasodilators were adjusted conventionally in control and included remote PA pressure information in treatment. Annualized HF hospitalization rates, changes in PA pressures over time (analyzed by area under the curve), changes in medications, and quality of life (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire scores) were assessed. Patients who had cardiac resynchronization therapy (n=190, median implant duration 755 days) at enrollment had poor hemodynamic function (cardiac index 2.00±0.59 L/min per m 2 ), high comorbidity burden (67% had secondary pulmonary hypertension, 61% had estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 ), and poor Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire scores (57±24). During 18 months randomized follow-up, HF hospitalizations were 30% lower in treatment (n=91, 62 events, 0.46 events/patient-year) versus control patients (n=99, 93 events, 0.68 events/patient-year) (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.51-0.96; P =0.028). Treatment patients had more medication up-/down-titrations (847 versus 346 in control, P <0.001), mean PA pressure reduction (area under the curve -413.2±123.5 versus 60.1±88.0 in control, P =0.002), and quality of life improvement (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire decreased -13.5±23 versus -4.9±24.8 in control, P =0.006). Conclusions Remote hemodynamic-guided adjustment of medical therapies decreased PA pressures and the burden of HF symptoms and hospitalizations in patients with recurring Class III HF and hospitalizations, beyond the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00531661.

Objectives: This study compared rates of procedural success and complications between de novo cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation versus upgrade, including characterization of technical challenges., Background: CRT upgrade is common, but data are limited on the incidence of procedural success and complications as compared to de novo implantation., Methods: All patients who underwent a transvenous CRT procedure at a single institution between 2013 and 2018 were reviewed for procedure outcome, 90-day complications, reasons for unsuccessful left ventricular lead delivery, and the presence of venous occlusive disease (VOD) that required a modified implantation technique., Results: Among 1,496 patients, 947 (63%) underwent de novo implantation and 549 (37%) underwent device upgrade. Patients who received a device upgrade were older (70 ± 12 years vs. 68 ± 13 years; p < 0.01), with a male predominance (75% vs. 66%; p < 0.01) and greater prevalence of comorbidities. There was no difference in the rate of procedural success between de novo and upgrade CRT procedures (97% vs. 96%; p = 0.28) or 90-day complications (5.1% vs. 4.6%; p = 0.70). VOD was present in 23% of patients who received a device upgrade and was more common among patients with a dual-chamber versus a single-chamber device (26% vs. 9%; p < 0.001). Patients with and without VOD had a similar composite outcome of procedural failure or complication (8.0% vs. 7.8%; p = 1.0)., Conclusions: Rates of procedural success and complications were no different between de novo CRT implantations and upgrades. VOD frequently increased procedural complexity in upgrades, but alternative management strategies resulted in similar outcomes. Routine venography before CRT upgrade may aid in procedural planning and execution of these strategies., Competing Interests: Author Disclosures Dr. Wilkoff has received honoraria/consultant fees from Medtronic, Abbott, and Philips Healthcare. Dr. Rickard has received honoraria/consultant fees from Abbott and Medtronic. Dr. Tarakji has received honoraria/consultant fees from Medtronic and AliveCor. Dr. Varma has received honoraria/consultant fees from St. Jude Medical, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, and Medtronic. Drs. Hussein and Wazni have received honoraria/consultant fees from Biosense Webster and Boston Scientific. Dr. Cantillon has received honoraria/consultant fees from Abbott and Boston Scientific. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Left ventricular (LV) epicardial pacing results in slowly propagating paced wavefronts. We postulated that this effect might limit cardiac resynchronization therapy efficacy in patients with LV enlargement using conventional biventricular pacing with single-site LV pacing, but be mitigated by LV stimulation from 2 widely spaced sites using MultiPoint pacing with wide anatomic separation (MPP-AS: ≥30 mm). We tested this hypothesis in the multicenter randomized MPP investigational device exemption trial., Methods: Following implant, quadripolar biventricular single-site pacing was activated in all patients (n=506). From 3 to 9 months postimplant, among patients with available baseline LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) measures, 188 received biventricular single-site pacing and 43 received MPP-AS. Patients were dichotomized by median baseline LVEDV indexed to height (LVEDVI Median ). Outcomes were measured by the clinical composite score (primary efficacy end point), quality of life, LV structural remodeling (↑EF >5% and ↓ESV 10%) and heart failure event/cardiovascular death., Results: LVEDVI Median was 1.1 mL/cm. Baseline characteristics differed in patients with LVEDVI >Median versus LVEDVI ≤Median . Among patients with LVEDVI >Median , biventricular single-site pacing was less efficacious compared to patients with LVEDVI ≤Median (clinical composite score, 65% versus 79%). In contrast, MPP-AS programming generated greater clinical composite score response (92% versus 65%, P =0.023) and improved quality of life (-31.0±29.7 versus -15.7±22.1, P =0.038) versus biventricular single-site pacing in patients with LVEDVI >Median . Reverse remodeling trended better with MPP-AS programming. In patients with LVEDVI >Median , heart failure event rate increased following the 3-month randomization point with biventricular single-site pacing (0.0150±0.1725 in LVEDVI >Median versus -0.0190±0.0808 in LVEDVI ≤Median , P =0.012), but no heart failure event occurred in patients with MPP-AS programming between 3 and 9 months in LVEDVI >Median . All measured outcomes did not differ in patients receiving MPP-AS and biventricular single-site pacing with LVEDVI ≤Median ., Conclusions: Conventional biventricular single-site pacing, even with a quadripolar lead, has reduced efficacy in patients with LV enlargement. However, the greatest response rate in patients with larger hearts was observed when programmed to MPP-AS pacing.

Background: Injury to the cardiac venous structures can complicate left ventricular lead placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Little is known about the outcomes of coronary sinus (CS) dissection with or without perforation., Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the outcomes in patients who had a CS injury during CRT implantation., Methods: All patients undergoing procedures for CRT implantation at the Cleveland Clinic (2001-2018) were enrolled in a prospectively maintained registry for procedural profiles and complications. All patients with cardiac venous injuries during the procedures were included., Results: CS injury occurred in 35 of 5011 patients (0.7%; 6 perforations (17.1%), 29 dissections without perforation (82.9%)). In patients with dissection in the absence of perforation, attempts at CS lead placement after dissection were successful in 21 of 29 patients (72.4%). In those with perforation (n=6, 17.1%), CS lead placement was successful in one of them (16.7%). Cardiac tamponade occurred in 2 patients (5.7%), and the procedure was aborted in both of them. Overall, CS lead placement failed in 13 patients (37%) but 9 (25.7%) underwent subsequent CRT with CS lead placement (n=6, 17.1%; median 58 days later) or epicardial leads (n=3, 8.6%). Three of the remaining 4 patients (8.6%) refused to undergo further procedures, and the fourth (2.9%) died of a complicated course., Conclusion: CS injury is not common during CRT implantation procedures and did not preclude successful lead placement in 23 of 35 patients (65.7%) during the index procedure and 6 of 6 (100%) during the subsequent attempted procedures. A low rate of mortality was observed in such patients, but CS injury was associated with increased morbidity., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves heart failure outcomes but has significant nonresponse rates, highlighting limitations in ECG selection criteria: QRS duration (QRSd) ≥150 ms and subjective labeling of left bundle branch block (LBBB). We explored unsupervised machine learning of ECG waveforms to identify CRT subgroups that may differentiate outcomes beyond QRSd and LBBB., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 946 CRT patients with conduction delay. Principal component analysis (PCA) dimensionality reduction obtained a 2-dimensional representation of preCRT 12-lead QRS waveforms. k -means clustering of the 2-dimensional PCA representation of 12-lead QRS waveforms identified 2 patient subgroups (QRS PCA groups). Vectorcardiographic QRS area was also calculated. We examined following 2 primary outcomes: (1) composite end point of death, left ventricular assist device, or heart transplant, and (2) degree of echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) change after CRT., Results: Compared with QRS PCA Group 2 ( n =425), Group 1 ( n =521) had lower risk for reaching the composite end point (HR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.38-0.53]; P <0.001) and experienced greater mean LVEF improvement (11.1±11.7% versus 4.8±9.7%; P <0.001), even among patients with LBBB with QRSd ≥150 ms (HR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.30-0.57]; P <0.001; mean LVEF change 12.5±11.8% versus 7.3±8.1%; P =0.001). QRS area also stratified outcomes but had significant differences from QRS PCA groups. A stratification scheme combining QRS area and QRS PCA group identified patients with LBBB with similar outcomes to non-LBBB patients (HR, 1.32 [95% CI, 0.93-1.62]; difference in mean LVEF change: 0.8% [95% CI, -2.1% to 3.7%]). The stratification scheme also identified patients with LBBB with QRSd <150 ms with comparable outcomes to patients with LBBB with QRSd ≥150 ms (HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.67-1.29]; difference in mean LVEF change: -0.2% [95% CI, -2.7% to 3.0%])., Conclusions: Unsupervised machine learning of ECG waveforms identified CRT subgroups with relevance beyond LBBB and QRSd. This method may assist in objective classification of bundle branch block morphology in CRT.

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is indicated in patients with medically refractory heart failure and wide QRS duration. While much is known about predictors of left ventricular (LV) remodeling after CRT implantation and short-term mortality, limited data exist on long-term outcomes after CRT placement., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing CRT implantation at our center between 2003 and 2008 and examined mortality using institutional electronic records, social security death index, and online obituary search. We included only patients with preimplant echoes with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) 35% or below. Variable selection was performed using stepwise regression and models were compared using goodness-of-fit criteria. A final model was validated with the bootstrap regression method., Results: Out of the 877 CRT patients undergoing implantation during this time, 287 (32.7%) survived longer than 10 years. Significant (P < .05) predictors of survival in our multivariate model were age, left ventricular diastolic diameter, sex, presence of nonischemic vs ischemic cardiomyopathy, QRS duration, atrial fibrillation, BNP levels, and creatinine levels at the time of CRT implantation. A model using the odds ratios from these variables had a receiver operating curve with an area under the curve score of 0.816 (standard error, 0.019) at predicting survival or freedom from LVAD or heart transplant for longer than 10 years after CRT implantation. The specificity for factors 3 or above and 5 or above was 68% and 77%, respectively., Conclusion: A large proportion of patients are still alive 10 years after CRT implantation. Variables at the time of CRT implant can help provide prognostic information to patients and electrophysiologists to determine the long-term benefit and survival of patients after CRT implantation., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Introduction: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to improve survival in patients with systolic heart failure, wide QRS duration, and left-bundle-branch-block. However, CRT outcomes stratified by right ventricular (RV) function at implant have not been well studied., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients at Cleveland Clinic who underwent CRT implantation (n = 777) from 2003 to 2011 with a diagnosis of heart failure, echocardiography with both pre-CRT left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35% and available post-CRT echocardiography at 6 months post-implant. CRT response was defined as LVEF improvement ≥5%. Patients were separated into 2 groups: normal or mild RV dysfunction (n = 570) labeled Normal RV; moderate to severe dysfunction (n = 207) labeled RV DYSFXN based on qualitative echocardiography assessment. Survival was calculated as time from CRT implant to death, left ventricular assist device implant, or heart transplant., Results: CRT response was significantly higher in patients with Normal RV (67%) compared with patients with RV DYSFXN (56%; P = .006). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that CRT patients with Normal RV had significantly greater survival compared with patients with RV DYSFXN (P < .001). In multivariable Cox regression accounting for a priori covariates, RV DYSFXN was associated with worse survival (HR 1.41 [95% CI: 1.14-1.75], P = .002) and lower CRT response (HR 0.66 [95% CI: 0.44-0.97], P = .03)., Conclusion: Baseline RV dysfunction at CRT implant is an important predictor of worsened left ventricular remodeling and survival in CRT patients., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Optimal timing of the atrioventricular delay in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can improve synchrony in patients suffering from heart failure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of SyncAV™ on electrical synchrony as measured by vectorcardiography (VCG) derived QRS metrics during bi-ventricular (BiV) pacing., Methods: Patients implanted with a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device and quadripolar left ventricular (LV) lead underwent 12‑lead ECG recordings. VCG metrics, including QRS duration (QRSd) and area, were derived from the ECG by a blinded observer during: intrinsic conduction, BiV with nominal atrioventricular delays (BiV Nominal), and BiV with SyncAV programmed to the optimal offset achieving maximal synchronization (BiV + SyncAV Opt)., Results: One hundred patients (71% male, 40% ischemic, 65% LBBB, 32 ± 9% ejection fraction) completed VCG assessment. QRSd during intrinsic conduction (166 ± 25 ms) was narrowed successively by BiV Nominal (137 ± 23 ms, p < .05 vs. intrinsic) and BiV + SyncAV Opt (122 ± 22 ms, p < .05 vs. BiV Nominal). Likewise, 3D QRS area during intrinsic conduction (90 ± 42 mV ∗ ms) was reduced by BiV Nominal (65 ± 39 mV ∗ ms, p < .05 vs. intrinsic) and further by BiV + SyncAV Opt (53 ± 30 mV ∗ ms, p = .06 vs. BiV Nominal)., Conclusion: With VCG-based, patient-specific optimization of the programmable offset, SyncAV reduced electrical dyssynchrony beyond conventional CRT., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest JM, NB and LM are employees of Abbott. FP, CP, BT and LC received research grants and/or are consultants with Abbott. NV reports consulting fees/honoraria from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, and Medtronic. This study was funded by Abbott., (Crown Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has significant nonresponse rates. We assessed whether machine learning (ML) could predict CRT response beyond current guidelines., Methods: We analyzed CRT patients from Cleveland Clinic and Johns Hopkins. A training cohort was created from all Johns Hopkins patients and an equal number of randomly sampled Cleveland Clinic patients. All remaining patients comprised the testing cohort. Response was defined as ≥10% increase in left ventricular ejection fraction. ML models were developed to predict CRT response using different combinations of classification algorithms and clinical variable sets on the training cohort. The model with the highest area under the curve was evaluated on the testing cohort. Probability of response was used to predict survival free from a composite end point of death, heart transplant, or placement of left ventricular assist device. Predictions were compared with current guidelines., Results: Nine hundred twenty-five patients were included. On the training cohort (n=470: 235, Johns Hopkins; 235, Cleveland Clinic), the best ML model was a naive Bayes classifier including 9 variables (QRS morphology, QRS duration, New York Heart Association classification, left ventricular ejection fraction and end-diastolic diameter, sex, ischemic cardiomyopathy, atrial fibrillation, and epicardial left ventricular lead). On the testing cohort (n=455, Cleveland Clinic), ML demonstrated better response prediction than guidelines (area under the curve, 0.70 versus 0.65; P=0.012) and greater discrimination of event-free survival (concordance index, 0.61 versus 0.56; P<0.001). The fourth quartile of the ML model had the greatest risk of reaching the composite end point, whereas the first quartile had the least (hazard ratio, 0.34; P<0.001)., Conclusions: ML with 9 variables incrementally improved prediction of echocardiographic CRT response and survival beyond guidelines. Performance was not improved by incorporating more variables. The model offers potential for improved shared decision-making in CRT (online calculator: http://riskcalc.org:3838/CRTResponseScore ). Significant remaining limitations confirm the need to identify better variables to predict CRT response.

Background: Patient-specific programming of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is often neglected, despite significant nonresponse rates. The device-based SyncAV CRT algorithm dynamically adjusts atrioventricular delays to the intrinsic AV interval, reduced by a programmable offset, to accommodate each patient's changing needs., Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the acute effect of biventricular (BiV) pacing enhanced by SyncAV on electrical synchrony in a broad patient population., Methods: Patients with existing CRT implants were prospectively evaluated at 5 international centers. Blinded 12-lead electrocardiographic QRS duration (QRSd) measurements were used to compare intrinsic conduction with nominal BiV pacing, BiV + SyncAV (default 50 ms offset), and BiV + SyncAV (optimized, patient-specific offset). BiV configurations were tested twice using the latest activating and earliest activating left ventricular (LV) electrodes as cathodes., Results: Ninety patients (mean age 67.1 ± 9.5 years; 67 (74%) men; 55 (63%) with left bundle branch block; 37 (43%) with ischemic cardiomyopathy; LV ejection fraction 32% ± 9%) with intact atrioventricular conduction (PR interval 195 ± 45 ms) were enrolled. With BiV pacing from the latest activating LV electrode, the intrinsic QRSd of 155 ± 29 ms was reduced by 9% ± 20% to 138 ± 27 ms using traditional BiV pacing and by 13% ± 14% to 133 ± 25 ms using BiV + SyncAV (50 ms offset). The maximal QRSd reduction by 20% ± 10% to 123 ± 22 ms was achieved by BiV + SyncAV with an optimized offset. Similar QRSd reductions were observed with BiV pacing from the earliest activating LV electrode across all settings. Of all baseline characteristics, intrinsic QRSd was the only significant predictor of QRSd reduction magnitude., Conclusion: SyncAV improved acute electrical synchrony beyond conventional CRT, particularly with patient-specific optimization. The degree of synchrony restored was contingent on intrinsic QRSd, but not limited by other baseline characteristics or by the LV pacing electrode used., (Crown Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Longer QRS duration (QRSd) improves, but increased left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) reduces, efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). QRSd/LVEDV ratios differ between sexes. We hypothesized that in the EchoCRT (Echocardiography Guided Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy) trial enrolling patients with heart failure with QRSd <130 ms, those with larger LVEDV would deteriorate but those with the highest QRSd/LVEDV would improve with CRT., Methods and Results: Primary outcome in patients (n=787, 72% men, 93% New York Heart Association class III, QRSd <130 ms, LV ejection fraction ≤35%, LV dilation and dyssynchrony) randomized to CRT-ON or CRT-OFF and followed up for 19 months was compared according to LVEDV (height indexed) or QRSd/LVEDV ratio, in multivariable analysis. Structural remodeling was assessed echocardiographically 6 months after implantation. Patients with baseline LVEDV higher than or equal to median worsened with CRT (death/heart failure hospitalization: CRT-ON versus CRT-OFF, 35.2% versus 24.5% [hazard ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-2.42; P =0.012]), but those with LVEDV lower than median remained unaffected. Patients with the highest QRSd/LVEDV ratio improved with CRT (death/heart failure hospitalization in top quartile: 20.9% in CRT-ON [n=91] versus 28.3% in CRT-OFF [n=106] [hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-1.24; P =0.188], versus the remaining quartiles: 31.7% in CRT-ON [n=300] versus 24.8% in CRT-OFF [n=290] [hazard ratio, 1.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-2.02; P =0.016], test for interaction P =0.046). QRSd and dyssynchrony were similar between groups. The 3-way test for interaction indicated no sex-specific effects. However, numerically, men with LVEDV higher than or equal to median accounted for worse outcomes of CRT-ON. Women, with the highest QRSd/LVEDV ratio exhibited significant reverse remodeling., Conclusion: CRT has opposite effects among patients with heart failure with QRSd <130 ms according to LV size: worsening outcomes in patients with larger LV, but inducing beneficial effects in those with smaller LV., Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT00683696., (© 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.)

This review aims to cover the latest evidence of remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices for the management of atrial fibrillation and heart failure. Remote monitoring is useful for early detection for device-detected atrial fibrillation, which increases the risk of thromboembolic events. Early anticoagulation based on remote monitoring potentially reduces the risk of stroke, but optimal alert setting needs to be clarified. Multiparameter monitoring with automatic transmission is useful for heart failure management. Improved adherence to remote monitoring and an optimal algorithm for transmitted alerts and their management are warranted in the management of heart failure., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: QRS narrowing following cardiac resynchronization therapy with biventricular (BiV) or left ventricular (LV) pacing is likely affected by patient-specific conduction characteristics (PR, qLV, LV-paced propagation interval), making a universal programming strategy likely ineffective. We tested these factors using a novel, device-based algorithm (SyncAV) that automatically adjusts paced atrioventricular delay (default or programmable offset) according to intrinsic atrioventricular conduction., Methods and Results: Seventy-five patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (age 66±11 years; 65% male; 32% with ischemic cardiomyopathy; LV ejection fraction 28±8%; QRS duration 162±16 ms) with intact atrioventricular conduction (PR interval 194±34, range 128-300 ms), left bundle branch block, and optimized LV lead position were studied at implant. QRS duration (QRSd) reduction was compared for the following pacing configurations: nominal simultaneous BiV (Mode I: paced/sensed atrioventricular delay=140/110 ms), BiV+SyncAV with 50 ms offset (Mode II), BiV+SyncAV with offset that minimized QRSd (Mode III), or LV-only pacing+SyncAV with 50 ms offset (Mode IV). The intrinsic QRSd (162±16 ms) was reduced to 142±17 ms (-11.8%) by Mode I, 136±14 ms (-15.6%) by Mode IV, and 132±13 ms (-17.8%) by Mode II. Mode III yielded the shortest overall QRSd (123±12 ms, -23.9% [ P <0.001 versus all modes]) and was the only configuration without QRSd prolongation in any patient. QRS narrowing occurred regardless of QRSd, PR, or LV-paced intervals, or underlying ischemic disease., Conclusions: Post-implant electrical optimization in already well-selected patients with left bundle branch block and optimized LV lead position is facilitated by patient-tailored BiV pacing adjusted to intrinsic atrioventricular timing using an automatic device-based algorithm., (© 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.)

Objectives: The MultiPoint Pacing (MPP) trial assessed the safety and efficacy of pacing 2 left ventricular sites with a quadripolar lead in patients with heart failure indicated for a CRT-D device., Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy nonresponse is a complex problem where stimulation of multiple left ventricular sites may be a solution., Methods: Enrolled patients were indicated for a CRT-D system. Bi-ventricular (Bi-V) pacing was activated at implant. Three months later, clinical response was assessed and the patient was randomized (1:1) to receive Bi-V pacing or MPP. Patients were followed for 6 months post-randomization and clinical response was again assessed., Results: The CRT-D system was successfully implanted in 455 of 469 attempted implants (97%). A total of 381 patients were randomized to Bi-V or MPP at 3 months. The primary safety endpoint was met with freedom from system-related complications of 93.2%. The primary efficacy endpoint of the noninferiority comparison of nonresponder rates between the 2 arms was met. Patients randomized to MPP arm and programmed to pace from anatomically distant poles (MPP-AS) responded to therapy at significantly higher rates than MultiPoint pacing-other programmed settings (MPP-Other). Within this group, 87% were responders at 9 months, 100% designated as nonresponders at 3 months converted to responders at 9 months, and 54% experienced an incremental response compared to MPP-Other. Also within MPP-AS, 92% of patients with de novo CRT-D implant were classified as responders compared with patients with MPP-Other., Conclusions: MPP is safe and effective for treating heart failure. The study met the pre-specified hypothesis that response to MPP is noninferior to Bi-V pacing with a quadripolar left ventricular lead. (MultiPoint Pacing IDE Study [MPP IDE]; NCT01786993)., (Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Assess defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) with right active pectoral implantable cardioverter defibrillator (RICDs). Defibrillation thresholds in patients receiving RICDs are regarded as 'high' and potentially improved by waveform optimization (tuning). However, this has not been systematically tested., Methods and Results: Patients receiving RICDs [Single chamber (VVI) = 16, DDD = 32, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) = 43] were randomized to either 50/50% fixed tilt (FT) or tuned waveform (3.5 ms time constant based). Defibrillation threshold was tested with a binary search protocol in single coil anodal configuration. Then RICDs were compared with left-sided placements. Baseline patient characteristics in FT (n = 54) and tuned (n = 37) were similar (65 ± 14 years, 71% male, Left ventricular ejection fraction 31 ± 13%; and proportions VVI/DDD/Cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator). Tuning reduced Phase 1 by 15% and Phase 2 by 45%. For FT vs. tuned: high voltage impedance was 61.9 ± 13.2 vs. 64.5 ± 12.7 Ω (P = 0.33) and mean DFT 14.2 ± 8.8 vs. 14.9 ± 9.2 J (P = 0.8). When high voltage impedance was >62 Ω (mean 73.6 ± 8.6 Ω), DFT was identical [FT 13.0 ± 7.9 J vs. tuned 12.0 ± 5.9 J (P= 0.7)]. Defibrillation thresholds exceeded 20 J (600 V) in >20% of patients [FT 11/54 (20.4%) vs. tuned 12/37 (32%) patients]. Defibrillation threshold with RICD was greater and exhibited wider dispersion compared with left ICDs (n = 54) under similar conditions., Conclusion: This first randomized trial investigating DFTs with right ICDs confirms relatively higher DFTs with RICDs than reported for left pectoral ICDs. However, DFTs were generally unaffected by 3.5 ms time constant-based waveform tuning compared with a 50% tilt waveform. Implant testing may be preferred with RICDs., Clinical Trial Number: NCT00873691., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2016. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Aims: Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators may improve clinical outcome. A recent meta-analysis of three randomized controlled trials (TRUST, ECOST, IN-TIME) using a specific remote monitoring system with daily transmissions [Biotronik Home Monitoring (HM)] demonstrated improved survival. We performed a patient-level analysis to verify this result with appropriate time-to-event statistics and to investigate further clinical endpoints., Methods and Results: Individual data of the TRUST, ECOST, and IN-TIME patients were pooled to calculate absolute risks of endpoints at 1-year follow-up for HM vs. conventional follow-up. All-cause mortality analysis involved all three trials (2405 patients). Other endpoints involved two trials, ECOST and IN-TIME (1078 patients), in which an independent blinded endpoint committee adjudicated the underlying causes of hospitalizations and deaths. The absolute risk of death at 1 year was reduced by 1.9% in the HM group (95% CI: 0.1-3.8%; P = 0.037), equivalent to a risk ratio of 0.62. Also the combined endpoint of all-cause mortality or hospitalization for worsening heart failure (WHF) was significantly reduced (by 5.6%; P = 0.007; risk ratio 0.64). The composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization tended to be reduced by a similar degree (4.1%; P = 0.13; risk ratio 0.85) but without statistical significance., Conclusion: In a pooled analysis of the three trials, HM reduced all-cause mortality and the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or WHF hospitalization. The similar magnitudes of absolute risk reductions for WHF and CV endpoints suggest that the benefit of HM is driven by the prevention of heart failure exacerbation.

Introduction: Strong evidence exists for the utility of remote monitoring in cardiac implantable electronic devices for early detection of arrhythmias and evaluation of system performance. The application of remote monitoring for the management of chronic disease such as heart failure has been an active area of research. Areas covered: This review aims to cover the latest evidence of remote monitoring of implantable cardiac defibrillators in terms of heart failure prognosis. This article also updates the current technology relating to the method and discusses key factors to be addressed in order to better use the approach. PubMed and internet searches were conducted to acquire most recent data and technology information. Expert commentary: Multiparameter monitoring with automatic transmission is useful for heart failure management. Improved adherence to remote monitoring and an optimal algorithm for transmitted alerts and their management are warranted in the management of heart failure.

Aims: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) requires effective left ventricular (LV) pacing (i.e. sufficient energy and appropriate timing to capture). The AdaptivCRT™ (aCRT) algorithm serves to maintain ventricular fusion during LV or biventricular pacing. This function was tested by comparing the morphological consistency of ventricular depolarizations and percentage effective LV pacing in CRT patients randomized to aCRT vs. echo-optimization., Methods and Results: Continuous recordings (≥20 h) of unipolar LV electrograms from aCRT (n = 38) and echo-optimized patients (n = 22) were analysed. Morphological consistency was determined by the correlation coefficient between each beat and a template beat. Effective LV pacing of paced beats was assessed by algorithmic analysis of negative initial EGM deflection in each evoked response. The %CRT pacing delivered, %effective LV pacing (i.e. % of paced beats with effective LV pacing), and overall %effective CRT (i.e. product of %CRT pacing and %effective LV pacing) were compared between aCRT and echo-optimized patients. Demographics were similar between groups. The mean correlation coefficient between individual beats and template was greater for aCRT (0.96 ± 0.03 vs. 0.91 ± 0.13, P = 0.07). Although %CRT pacing was similar for aCRT and echo-optimized (median 97.4 vs. 98.6%, P = 0.14), %effective LV pacing was larger for aCRT [99.6%, (99.1%, 99.9%) vs. 94.3%, (24.3%, 99.8%), P=0.03]. For aCRT vs. echo-optimized groups, the proportions of patients with ≥90% effective LV pacing was 92 vs. 55% (P = 0.002), and with ≥90% effective CRT was 79 vs. 45%, respectively (P = 0.018)., Conclusion: AdaptivCRT™ significantly increased effective LV pacing over echo-optimized CRT., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2016. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: QRS duration (QRSd) may be impacted by both left ventricular (LV) dilatation and conduction delay. It is possible therefore that the same QRSd may portend significantly different amounts of LV activation delay in patients with small versus large left ventricles. We hypothesized that LV size modifies the effect of QRSd on predicting outcomes in patients undergoing CRT implant., Methods: We extracted data on consecutive patients presenting for initial CRT implant. In patients with a follow-up echocardiogram, response was defined as an absolute improvement in LV ejection fraction ≥5%. Multivariate models were created to determine if left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) modified the effect of QRSd on its association with both long-term survival free of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and heart transplant and echocardiographic response., Results: 464 patients met inclusion criteria. At a mean follow-up of 4.9 ± 2.6 years, there were 210 deaths, 13 heart transplants, and 12 LVAD placements. There was a weak but significant correlation between baseline QRSd and LVEDD (Spearman's Rho 0.106, P < 0.001). In a multivariate analysis, there was no evidence of effect modification of LVEDD on QRSd (LVEDDi*QRS interaction term HR 1.0 [0.995-1.006], P = 0.94). Note that 305 patients had a follow-up echocardiogram, of whom 193 met the criteria for response. In a multivariate analysis, there was no evidence of effect modification of LVEDD on QRSd (LVEDDi*QRS interaction term odds ratio 0.998 (0.988-1.008), P = 0.65)., Conclusion: LV size does not modify the effect of QRSd and its association with outcomes following CRT. The correlation between LV size and QRSd in patients with a QRSd ≥ 120 ms is weak., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Remote monitoring (RM) receives a Class I: Level of Evidence: A recommendation for the follow-up of patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, positioning the technology as standard of care. RM is often seen and sold as a plug-and-play technology, whereas fundamental differences exist in the philosophy and conception of the 5 main RM systems. The capabilities and limitations of the different RM systems need to be understood and taken into account when the decision is made to remotely manage an individual patient. The purpose of this review is to provide to the cardiologist practical information about RM systems' specificities with respect to the different technical and clinical alerts. Clinically based indications and programming suggestions are provided., (Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Guidelines advocate remote monitoring (RM) in patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED). However, it is not known when RM should be initiated. We hypothesized that prompt initiation of RM (within 91 days of implant) is associated with improved survival compared to delayed initiation., Methods: This retrospective, national, observational cohort study evaluated patients receiving new implants of market-released St. Jude Medical™ pacemakers (PM), implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices. Patients were assigned to one of two groups: an "RM Prompt" group, in which RM was initiated within 91 days of implant; and an "RM Delayed" group, in which RM was initiated >91 days but ≤365 days of implant. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality., Results: The cohort included 106,027 patients followed for a mean of 2.6 ± 0.9 years. Overall, 47,014 (44 %) patients had a PM, 31,889 (30 %) patients had an ICD, 24,005 (23 %) patients had a CRT-D, and 3119 (3 %) patients had a CRT-P. Remote monitoring was initiated promptly (median 4 weeks [IQR 2, 8 weeks]) in 66,070 (62 %) patients; in the other 39,957 (38 %) patients, RM initiation was delayed (median 24 weeks [IQR 18, 34 weeks]). In comparison to delayed initiation, prompt initiation of RM was associated with a lower mortality rate (4023 vs. 4679 per 100,000 patient-years, p < 0.001) and greater adjusted survival (HR 1.18 [95 % CI 1.13-1.22], p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Our data, for the first time, show improved survival in patients enrolled promptly into RM following CIED implantation. This advantage was observed across all CIED device types.

Background: In EchoCRT, a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with a QRS duration of <130 ms and echocardiographic evidence of left ventricular dyssynchrony, the primary outcome (death from any cause or first hospitalization for worsening heart failure) occurred more frequently in the CRT-ON when compared with the control group. In this prespecified subgroup analysis, we evaluated the effect of sex on clinical outcome in EchoCRT., Methods and Results: In EchoCRT, 585 (72%) of included patients were men. At baseline, male patients had a higher incidence of ischemic cardiomyopathy and longer QRS duration. On uni- and multivariable analysis, no significant interaction was observed regarding sex for the primary or any of the secondary end points. Numerically, a higher all-cause mortality was observed in male patients randomized to CRT-ON versus CRT-OFF on univariable analysis (hazard ratio, 1.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-3.12); however, no statistically significant interaction compared with females randomized to CRT-ON versus CRT-OFF was noted (hazard ratio, 0.99; P interaction, 0.56). There was no difference in the primary safety end point of system-related complications, including CRT system- and implantation-related events., Conclusions: The largest hazard for all-cause mortality in EchoCRT was observed in men randomized to CRT-ON; the comparison with women did not reach statistical significance, which may be because of the premature termination of the trial and the limited data. These results suggest that male sex may be a risk factor for harm by CRT in patients with narrow QRS width, an observation which deserves further investigation., Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00683696., (© 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Introduction: QRS characteristics are the cornerstone of patient selection in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and the presence of left bundle branch block (LBBB) and baseline QRS ≥150 milliseconds portends a good outcome. We previously showed that baseline QRS frequency analysis adds predictive value to LBBB alone and have hypothesized that a change in frequency characteristics following CRT may produce additional predictive value., Methods: We examined the QRS frequency characteristics of 182 LBBB patients before and soon after CRT. Patients were assigned to responder and nonresponder groups. Responders were defined by a decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) ≥15% following CRT. We analyzed the QRS in ECG leads I, AVF, and V3 before and soon after CRT using the discrete Fourier transform algorithm. The percentage of total QRS power within discrete frequency intervals before and after CRT was calculated. The reduction in lead V3 power <10 Hz was the best indicator of response., Results: Baseline QRS width was similar between the responders and nonresponders (162.2 ± 17.2 milliseconds vs. 158 ± 22.1 milliseconds, respectively; P = 0.180). Responders exhibited a greater reduction in QRS power <10 Hz (-17.0 ± 11.9% vs. -6.6 ± 12.5%; P < 0.001) and a significant AUC (0.743; P < 0.001). A ≥8% decline in QRS power <10 Hz produced the best predictive values (PPV = 84%, NPV = 59%). Importantly, when patients with baseline QRS <150 milliseconds were compared, the AUC improved (0.892, P < 0.001)., Conclusions: Successful CRT produces a significant reduction in QRS power below 10 Hz, particularly when baseline QRS <150 milliseconds. These results indicate that QRS frequency changes after CRT provide additional predictive value to QRS alone., (© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)