Back to Search Start Over

Improved survival in patients enrolled promptly into remote monitoring following cardiac implantable electronic device implantation.

Authors :
Mittal S
Piccini JP
Snell J
Prillinger JB
Dalal N
Varma N
Source :
Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing [J Interv Card Electrophysiol] 2016 Aug; Vol. 46 (2), pp. 129-36. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Feb 10.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Purpose: Guidelines advocate remote monitoring (RM) in patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED). However, it is not known when RM should be initiated. We hypothesized that prompt initiation of RM (within 91 days of implant) is associated with improved survival compared to delayed initiation.<br />Methods: This retrospective, national, observational cohort study evaluated patients receiving new implants of market-released St. Jude Medical™ pacemakers (PM), implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices. Patients were assigned to one of two groups: an "RM Prompt" group, in which RM was initiated within 91 days of implant; and an "RM Delayed" group, in which RM was initiated >91 days but ≤365 days of implant. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.<br />Results: The cohort included 106,027 patients followed for a mean of 2.6 ± 0.9 years. Overall, 47,014 (44 %) patients had a PM, 31,889 (30 %) patients had an ICD, 24,005 (23 %) patients had a CRT-D, and 3119 (3 %) patients had a CRT-P. Remote monitoring was initiated promptly (median 4 weeks [IQR 2, 8 weeks]) in 66,070 (62 %) patients; in the other 39,957 (38 %) patients, RM initiation was delayed (median 24 weeks [IQR 18, 34 weeks]). In comparison to delayed initiation, prompt initiation of RM was associated with a lower mortality rate (4023 vs. 4679 per 100,000 patient-years, p < 0.001) and greater adjusted survival (HR 1.18 [95 % CI 1.13-1.22], p < 0.001).<br />Conclusions: Our data, for the first time, show improved survival in patients enrolled promptly into RM following CIED implantation. This advantage was observed across all CIED device types.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1572-8595
Volume :
46
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
26860839
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-016-0112-y