Back to Search Start Over

Safety and Efficacy of Multipoint Pacing in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The MultiPoint Pacing Trial.

Authors :
Niazi I
Baker J 2nd
Corbisiero R
Love C
Martin D
Sheppard R
Worley SJ
Varma N
Lee K
Tomassoni G
Source :
JACC. Clinical electrophysiology [JACC Clin Electrophysiol] 2017 Dec 26; Vol. 3 (13), pp. 1510-1518. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Sep 27.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Objectives: The MultiPoint Pacing (MPP) trial assessed the safety and efficacy of pacing 2 left ventricular sites with a quadripolar lead in patients with heart failure indicated for a CRT-D device.<br />Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy nonresponse is a complex problem where stimulation of multiple left ventricular sites may be a solution.<br />Methods: Enrolled patients were indicated for a CRT-D system. Bi-ventricular (Bi-V) pacing was activated at implant. Three months later, clinical response was assessed and the patient was randomized (1:1) to receive Bi-V pacing or MPP. Patients were followed for 6 months post-randomization and clinical response was again assessed.<br />Results: The CRT-D system was successfully implanted in 455 of 469 attempted implants (97%). A total of 381 patients were randomized to Bi-V or MPP at 3 months. The primary safety endpoint was met with freedom from system-related complications of 93.2%. The primary efficacy endpoint of the noninferiority comparison of nonresponder rates between the 2 arms was met. Patients randomized to MPP arm and programmed to pace from anatomically distant poles (MPP-AS) responded to therapy at significantly higher rates than MultiPoint pacing-other programmed settings (MPP-Other). Within this group, 87% were responders at 9 months, 100% designated as nonresponders at 3 months converted to responders at 9 months, and 54% experienced an incremental response compared to MPP-Other. Also within MPP-AS, 92% of patients with de novo CRT-D implant were classified as responders compared with patients with MPP-Other.<br />Conclusions: MPP is safe and effective for treating heart failure. The study met the pre-specified hypothesis that response to MPP is noninferior to Bi-V pacing with a quadripolar left ventricular lead. (MultiPoint Pacing IDE Study [MPP IDE]; NCT01786993).<br /> (Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2405-5018
Volume :
3
Issue :
13
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
JACC. Clinical electrophysiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29759832
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2017.06.022