1. Conic reductions for Hamiltonian actions of $U(2)$ and its maximal torus
- Author
-
Roberto Paoletti and Paoletti, R
- Subjects
General Mathematics ,Linearization ,Holomorphic Hamiltonian action ,Coadjoint orbit ,Unitary group ,Mathematics - Symplectic Geometry ,Irreducible representation ,FOS: Mathematics ,Symplectic Geometry (math.SG) ,Contact lift ,Moment map ,Unit circle bundle ,Maximal toru ,Symplectic reduction ,Symplectic divisor - Abstract
Suppose given a Hamiltonian and holomorphic action of $$G=U(2)$$ G = U ( 2 ) on a compact Kähler manifold M, with nowhere vanishing moment map. Given an integral coadjoint orbit $$\mathcal {O}$$ O for G, under transversality assumptions we shall consider two naturally associated ‘conic’ reductions. One, which will be denoted $$\overline{M}^G_{\mathcal {O}}$$ M ¯ O G , is taken with respect to the action of G and the cone over $$\mathcal {O}$$ O ; another, which will be denoted $$\overline{M}^T_{\varvec{\nu }}$$ M ¯ ν T , is taken with respect to the action of the standard maximal torus $$T\leqslant G$$ T ⩽ G and the ray $$\mathbb {R}_+\,\imath \varvec{\nu }$$ R + ı ν along which the cone over $$\mathcal {O}$$ O intersects the positive Weyl chamber. These two reductions share a common ‘divisor’, which may be viewed heuristically as bridging between their structures. This point of view motivates studying the (rather different) ways in which the two reductions relate to the the latter divisor. In this paper we provide some indications in this direction. Furthermore, we give explicit transversality criteria for a large class of such actions in the projective setting, as well as a description of corresponding reductions as weighted projective varieties, depending on combinatorial data associated to the action and the orbit.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF