Search

Background: Insulin resistance (IR) is a potential predictor of antidepressant treatment response., Aims: We assess changes in IR after antidepressant treatment and whether these changes have any effect on treatment response. Also, to see whether changes in IR mediates relationship between C-reactive protein (CRP) and antidepressant efficacy., Methods: This is a secondary analysis of an 8-week, open-label clinical trial with 95 adults experiencing a major depressive episode. Response to vortioxetine was measured using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Generalized estimating equation models were utilized for this intent-to-treat analysis., Results: When adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index, there was a significant increase in IR following treatment in the overall sample (p = 0.035). This finding was detected in treatment non-responders (p = 0.019), whereas it was not observed in responders (p = 0.329). Mediation analysis revealed that change in IR during treatment was responsible for change in MADRS as well as the relationship between baseline CRP and treatment response., Conclusions: Exacerbation of IR during antidepressant treatment mediated non-response. Conversely in treatment responders IR reduced. Like previous studies, baseline CRP moderated treatment response. This relationship was also mediated by changes in IR. These findings further elucidate the role of IR in terms of antidepressant response as well as potentially explain inflammation's relationship with the latter.

Objective: Serotonergic psychedelics are re-emerging as potential novel treatments for several psychiatric disorders including major depressive disorder. The Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) convened a task force to review the evidence and provide a consensus recommendation for the clinical use of psychedelic treatments for major depressive disorder., Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify contemporary clinical trials of serotonergic psychedelics for the treatment of major depressive disorder and cancer-related depression. Studies published between January 1990 and July 2021 were identified using combinations of search terms, inspection of bibliographies and review of other psychedelic reviews and consensus statements. The levels of evidence for efficacy were graded according to the Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments criteria., Results: Only psilocybin and ayahuasca have contemporary clinical trials evaluating antidepressant effects. Two pilot studies showed preliminary positive effects of single-dose ayahuasca for treatment-resistant depression (Level 3 evidence). Small randomized controlled trials of psilocybin combined with psychotherapy showed superiority to waitlist controls and comparable efficacy and safety to an active comparator (escitalopram with supportive psychotherapy) in major depressive disorder, with additional randomized controlled trials showing efficacy specifically in cancer-related depression (Level 3 evidence). There was only one open-label trial of psilocybin in treatment-resistant unipolar depression (Level 4 evidence). Small sample sizes and functional unblinding were major limitations in all studies. Adverse events associated with psychedelics, including psychological (e.g., psychotomimetic effects) and physical (e.g., nausea, emesis and headaches) effects, were generally transient., Conclusions: There is currently only low-level evidence to support the efficacy and safety of psychedelics for major depressive disorder. In Canada, as of 2022, psilocybin remains an experimental option that is only available through clinical trials or the special access program. As such, Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments considers psilocybin an experimental treatment and recommends its use primarily within clinical trials, or, less commonly, through the special access program in rare, special circumstances.

Background: Symptoms of subthreshold depression may differentially affect the illness transition. We examined the impact of cognitive-affective and somatic symptoms on different subthreshold depression transitions as well as risk factors influencing the aforementioned symptoms changes., Methods: Adults with subthreshold depression in the Depression Cohort in China were enrolled. Data collection was conducted at baseline, 6 and 12 months from 2019 to 2020. Cognitive-affective and somatic symptoms were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. A total of 993 participants completed 12-month follow-up and were divided into persistent, intermittent and remission groups according to change in depressive symptoms. The longitudinal change of cognitive-affective and somatic symptoms in the three groups, as well as risk factors was analyzed using the generalized linear mixed-model., Results: There were 24.07 %, 34.04 % and 41.89 % of participants proceeding into persistent, intermittent and remission subthreshold depression groups, respectively. Cognitive-affective symptoms were the core symptoms for predicting the deterioration in persistent subthreshold depression (t = 2.48, P = 0.013), whereas somatic symptoms improved over time (t = -2.82, P = 0.005). Anxiety symptoms were the primary risk factors for worsening cognitive-affective symptoms (P < 0.001), following by insomnia symptoms, age, marital status, resilience and social functions. Somatic symptoms were affected by insomnia symptoms, anxiety symptoms and Body Mass Index successively., Limitations: Major Depressive Episode was not explored in follow-up., Conclusion: Cognitive-affective symptoms in subthreshold depression are at greater risk of illness deterioration. Future studies should endeavor to identify specific risk factors in different symptoms to forestall the transition from subthreshold to Major Depressive Disorder., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Patients unsuccessfully treated by neurostimulation may represent a highly intractable subgroup of depression. While the efficacy of intravenous (IV) ketamine has been established in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD), there is an interest to evaluate its effectiveness in a subpopulation with a history of neurostimulation., Methods: This retrospective, posthoc analysis compared the effects of four infusions of IV ketamine in 135 (x̄ = 44 ± 15.4 years of age) neurostimulation-naïve patients to 103 (x̄ = 47 ± 13.9 years of age) patients with a history of neurostimulation. The primary outcome evaluated changes in depression severity, measured by the Quick Inventory for Depression Symptomatology-Self Report 16-Item (QIDS-SR16). Secondary outcomes evaluated suicidal ideation (SI), anxiety severity, measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item (GAD-7), and consummatory anhedonia, measured by the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS)., Results: Following four infusions, both cohorts reported a significant reduction in QIDS-SR16 Total Score (F (4, 648) = 73.4, P < .001), SI (F (4, 642) = 28.6, P < .001), GAD-7 (F (2, 265) = 53.8, P < .001), and SHAPS (F (2, 302) = 45.9, P < .001). No between-group differences emerged. Overall, the neurostimulation-naïve group had a mean reduction in QIDS-SR16 Total Score of 6.4 (standard deviation [SD] = 5.3), whereas the history of neurostimulation patients reported a 4.3 (SD = 5.3) point reduction., Conclusion: IV ketamine was effective in reducing symptoms of depression, SI, anxiety, and anhedonia in both cohorts in this large, well-characterized community-based sample of adults with TRD.

Background: Higher body mass index (BMI) has been found to predict greater antidepressant response to intravenous (IV) ketamine treatment. We evaluated the association between BMI and response to repeat-dose IV ketamine in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD)., Methods: Adults (N = 230) with TRD received four infusions of IV ketamine at a community-based clinic. Changes in symptoms of depression (ie, Quick Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report 16; QIDS-SR16), suicidal ideation (SI; ie, QIDS-SR16 SI item), anxiety (ie, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Scale), anhedonic severity (ie, Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale), and functioning (ie, Sheehan Disability Scale) following infusions were evaluated. Participants were stratified by BMI as normal (18.0-24.9 kg/m2; n = 72), overweight (25-29.9 kg/m2; n = 76), obese I (30-34.9 kg/m2; n = 47), or obese II (≥35.0 kg/m2; n = 35)., Results: Similar antidepressant effects with repeat-dose ketamine were reported between BMI groups (P = .261). In addition, categorical partial response (P = .149), response (P = .526), and remission (P = .232) rates were similar between the four BMI groups., Conclusions: The findings are limited by the observational, open-label design of this retrospective analysis. Pretreatment BMI did not predict response to IV ketamine, which was effective regardless of BMI.

Background: Depression is associated with significant morbidity and human capital costs globally. Early screening for depressive symptoms and timely depressive disorder case identification and intervention may improve health outcomes and cost-effectiveness among affected individuals. China's public and academic communities have reached a consensus on the need to improve access to early screening, diagnosis, and treatment of depression., Objective: This study aims to estimate the screening prevalence and associated factors of subthreshold depressive symptoms among Chinese residents enrolled in the cohort study using a mobile app-based integrated mental health care model and investigate the 12-month incidence rate and related factors of major depressive disorder (MDD) among those with subthreshold depressive symptoms., Methods: Data were drawn from the Depression Cohort in China (DCC) study. A total of 4243 community residents aged 18 to 64 years living in Nanshan district, Shenzhen city, in Guangdong province, China, were encouraged to participate in the DCC study when visiting the participating primary health care centers, and 4066 (95.83%) residents who met the DCC study criteria were screened for subthreshold depressive symptoms using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 at baseline. Of the 4066 screened residents, 3168 (77.91%) with subthreshold depressive symptoms were referred to hospitals to receive a psychiatric diagnosis of MDD within 12 months. Sleep duration, anxiety symptoms, well-being, insomnia symptoms, and resilience were also investigated. The diagnosis of MDD was provided by trained psychiatrists using the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were performed to explore the potential factors related to subthreshold depressive symptoms at baseline, and Cox proportional hazards models were performed to explore the potential factors related to incident MDD., Results: Anxiety symptoms (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.63, 95% CI 1.42-1.87) and insomnia symptoms (AOR 1.13, 95% CI 1.05-1.22) were associated with an increased risk of subthreshold depressive symptoms, whereas well-being (AOR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87-0.99) was negatively associated with depressive symptoms. During the follow-up period, the 12-month incidence rate of MDD among participants with subthreshold depressive symptoms was 5.97% (189/3168). After incorporating all significant variables from the univariate analyses, the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model reported that a history of comorbidities (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 1.49, 95% CI 1.04-2.14) and anxiety symptoms (AHR 1.13, 95% CI 1.09-1.17) were independently associated with an increased risk of incident MDD. The 5-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index was associated with a decreased risk of incident MDD (AHR 0.90, 95% CI 0.86-0.94)., Conclusions: Elevated anxiety symptoms and unfavorable general well-being were significantly associated with subthreshold depressive symptoms and incident MDD among Chinese residents in Shenzhen. Early screening for subthreshold depressive symptoms and related factors may be helpful for identifying populations at high risk of incident MDD., (©Huimin Zhang, Yuhua Liao, Xue Han, Beifang Fan, Yifeng Liu, Leanna M W Lui, Yena Lee, Mehala Subramaniapillai, Lingjiang Li, Lan Guo, Ciyong Lu, Roger S McIntyre. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 20.05.2022.)

Sleep disturbances are commonly reported in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Available data have shown that intravenous (IV) ketamine is an effective treatment for patients with TRD and growing data suggest ketamine may improve overall sleep architecture. In the present study, we evaluated whether changes in sleep symptoms mediated the anti-depressive and/or anti-suicidal effects of IV ketamine and whether improvement in sleep correlated with a higher likelihood of achieving response or remission. Adults with TRD received four infusions of IV ketamine at a community-based clinic. Total depressive symptom severity was measured with the Quick Inventory Depressive Symptoms Self-Report 16-Item (QIDS-SR 16 ) at baseline and was repeated across four infusions. Suicidal ideation (SI) and four sleep symptoms were measured using the SI item and the five sleep items on the QIDS-SR 16 . A total of 323 patients with TRD received IV ketamine. Self-reported improvements in insomnia, night-time restlessness, hypersomnia, early morning waking, and total sleep were significant partial mediators to the improvements observed in depression severity. Similarly, insomnia, night-time restlessness, early morning waking and total sleep improvements mediated the reduction of IV ketamine on SI. All sleep items, except for hypersomnia, were associated with an increased likelihood of achieving response or remission. Notably, each point improvement in total sleep score was significantly associated with achieving responder/remitter status (odds ratio 3.29, 95% confidence interval 2.00-5.41). Insomnia, sleep restlessness, early morning waking and total sleep improvements were significant mediators of antidepressant and anti-suicidal improvements in patients with TRD receiving IV ketamine., (© 2021 European Sleep Research Society.)

Therapeutic deficiencies with monoaminergic antidepressants invites the need to identify and develop novel rapid-acting antidepressants. Hitherto, ketamine and esketamine are identified as safe, well-tolerated rapid-acting antidepressants in adults with treatment-resistant depression, and also mitigate measures of suicidality. Psilocybin is a naturally occurring psychoactive alkaloid and non-selective agonist at many serotonin receptors, especially at serotonin 5-HT 2A receptors, and is found in the Psilocybe genus of mushrooms. Preliminary studies with psilocybin have shown therapeutic promise across diverse populations including major depressive disorder. The pharmacodynamic mechanisms mediating the antidepressant and psychedelic effects of psilocybin are currently unknown but are thought to involve the modulation of the serotonergic system, primarily through agonism at the 5-HT 2A receptors and downstream changes in gene expression. It is also established that indirect effects on dopaminergic and glutamatergic systems are contributory, as well as effects at other lower affinity targets. Along with the direct effects on neurochemical systems, psilocybin alters neural circuitry and key brain regions previously implicated in depression, including the default mode network and amygdala. The aim of this review is to synthesize the current understanding of the receptor pharmacology and neuronal mechanisms underlying the psychedelic and putative antidepressant properties of psilocybin., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Antidepressants are associated with symptomatic worsening in a subgroup of patients. Replicated evidence has demonstrated rapid and robust antidepressant effects with intravenous (IV) ketamine in treatment resistant depression (TRD); however, the risk of ketamine worsening depressive symptoms in a subgroup of patients remains unknown. Herein we report a retrospective analysis on the rates of symptomatic worsening during an acute course of IV ketamine in individuals with unipolar (n = 142) and bipolar (n = 22) TRD. Adults (N = 164; mean age = 45.97) with TRD underwent four sub-anesthetic infusions (0.5-0.75 mg/kg over 40 min) of IV ketamine over two weeks, and were assessed with the Quick Inventory for Depression Symptomatology-Self Report-16 (QIDS-SR 16 ) at baseline and after each infusion. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients experiencing clinically significant worsening of depressive symptoms (≥20% increase on the QIDS-SR 16 ) at each time point relative to baseline. Secondary analyses explored trends in the results. The frequency of clinically significant worsening fluctuated between 1.83% to 5.49%, with no identifiable trend across time. Zero individuals with bipolar TRD reported symptomatic worsening. Limitations include the single-centered, uncontrolled, retrospective nature of this study. Rates of symptomatic worsening associated with IV ketamine therapy for TRD appear to be very low and similar to conventional antidepressants., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Approximately 0.35-1% of the general population is afflicted with psychotic depression at some time in their life. Psychotic depression is a subtype of major depressive disorder characterized by mood congruent hallucinations and/or delusions. Patients with psychotic depression often represent the most severe cases, with high relapse and mortality rate. Although treatment guidelines recommend a combination of antidepressants and antipsychotics or electroconvulsive therapy, most patients subsequently relapse due to treatment resistance. Furthermore, with the concern of antipsychotic drug's side effects (e.g., tardive dyskinesia), there is a need for an alternative pharmacotherapy for psychotic depression. Recently, several case studies demonstrated that treatment with ketamine not only ameliorated mood, but also improved psychotic symptoms in patients with treatment-resistant depression and psychotic features. However, the safety of ketamine in these patients is controversial since ketamine is known to induce psychotomimetic and dissociative effects. Additionally, the efficacy and safety of ketamine in patients with psychotic depression has not been established as most clinical trials have excluded these persons due to the theorized risk of aggravating psychotic symptoms. Notwithstanding, it is not established empirically that ketamine treatment in psychotic depression would predictably amplify psychotic symptoms and/or overall illness presentation. Future trials evaluating ketamine in depression should include patients with psychotic features to inform whether ketamine is safe and effective in this subpopulation., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objective: .To identify a meaningful change threshold (MCT) in depression outcomes in adults with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (MDD) or bipolar disorder (BD) receiving intravenous ketamine treatment at a community-based mood disorders center., Method: .A triangular approach integrating both anchor-based and distributive methods was used to identify meaningful change on the patient-reported Quick Inventory for Depressive Symptoms Self-Report 16-Item (QIDS-SR16) as associated with the Patient Global Impression - Severity (PGI-S). Both the QIDS-SR16 and the PGI-S are self-report measures, and were collected at five timepoints (timepoints were approximately 2-7 days apart)., Results: .A total of 297 adults with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) as part of either DSM-5-defined MDD or BD were included. The MCT for the QIDS-SR16 revealed that a mean improvement of 3.38 points from baseline was comparable to a 1-point improvement on the PGI-S. Together with an examination of the probability density function, a 3.5-point change is a reasonable MCT (i.e., 1-point PGI-S improvement) for the QIDS-SR16. A 2-point symptomatic improvement on the QIDS-SR16 was associated with no change on the PGI-S., Conclusion: .A 3.5-point reduction in the QIDS-SR16 represents a MCT based on the PGI-S for adults with treatment-resistant MDD or BD receiving intravenous ketamine treatment at a community-based mood disorders center. These findings are limited by the post-hoc nature of this analysis and open-label case-series design. Measurement-based care decisions by patients, providers and clinicians, as well as cost/reimbursement decisions should include consideration of meaningful change along with conventional objective outcomes., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

A proportion of individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) do not receive adequate therapeutic benefit from conventional monoaminergic antidepressant drugs, leading to treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Ketamine has been shown to provide rapid and significant efficacy in treating patients with TRD. The majority of published studies have investigated the adjunctive efficacy of ketamine with one or more monoaminergic antidepressants. There remains a clinical need to ascertain the relative effectiveness of ketamine monotherapy versus adjunctive ketamine treatment in adults with TRD. In this retrospective study, we investigate multidimensional, self-reported outcomes (i.e., antidepressant, anti-suicidality, antianxiety, and anti-functional impairment) of 220 patients to compare monotherapy (n = 39) and adjunctive (n = 181) ketamine treatment for TRD at a community-based clinic. Both groups had clinically and statistically significant antidepressant effects (p < 0.05). Individuals receiving ketamine monotherapy exhibited a significantly greater reduction on the suicidal ideation (SI) item of the Quick Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report 16-Item (QIDS-SR 16 ) than the adjunctive group, with a small effect size [F (1, 265) = 4.73; p = 0.03*; partial η 2  = 0.02], and a significantly higher proportion of partial responders at post-infusion 4 (p = 0.034*). No other between-group differences were significant. Limitations include the small sample, single-centred, open-label, non-randomized, uncontrolled, retrospective nature of this study and indication bias. Our real-world evidence suggests that ketamine may be effective as monotherapy or adjunct to monoamine-based treatments. A priority research and clinical vista is to identify subsets of individuals with TRD who are most likely to have a desired therapeutic outcome with monotherapy versus adjunctive ketamine treatment., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The efficacy of monoamine-based antidepressants in adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) is attenuated in persons with greater pre-treatment functional impairment. Herein, we investigated whether pre-treatment functioning in outpatients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) moderates response to intravenous (IV) ketamine., Methods: Adults (N= 326; M age  = 45) with DSM-5-defined MDD or bipolar disorder and TRD received repeat-dose IV ketamine at a community-based clinic. Function was evaluated with the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), using total scores as well as scores on the subdomains of workplace/school, social life, and family life/home responsibilities. The primary dependent measure was change in depressive symptoms from pre-treatment to post-infusion 4, as measured by the Quick Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report-16., Results: Total functional disability, as well as the subdomains of social life and family life/home responsibilities, significantly moderated response to IV ketamine (p = .003; p = .008; p = .008). Follow-up simple slopes analyses indicated a significant improvement in depressive symptoms across the functional domain spectrum (ps < .001). Above average functional disability (i.e., 1 SD > mean functional impairment within the sample) was associated with a greater change in depressive symptoms. Workplace function did not significantly moderate response to IV ketamine (p = .307), suggesting that individuals with significantly impaired workplace functioning may expect a similar response to ketamine as those with less workplace impairment., Conclusions: Symptomatic benefit with IV ketamine was observed in patients with TRD and significant pre-treatment functional impairment. The foregoing result has implications for mechanism of action, cost-effectiveness, and patient selection in adults with TRD receiving IV ketamine., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of repeated doses of intravenous (IV) ketamine in older adults (i.e., ≥60 years of age) with treatment-resistant depression., Method: In this case series, fifty-three older adults (M age  = 67, SD = 6; 57% female [n = 30]) received 4 IV ketamine infusions, administered over 1-2 weeks. Effectiveness of IV ketamine was measured using the Quick Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report 16 (QIDS-SR16) approximately 2 days after infusions 1-3, and 1-2 weeks after infusion 4. Safety was measured as hemodynamic changes before, during, immediately after, and 20 minutes after each infusion. Tolerability was assessed via systematic reporting of treatment-emergent adverse events during and after each infusion, in addition to symptoms of dissociation measured using the Clinician Administered Dissociative States Scale. Partial response (25%-50% symptomatic improvement from baseline), response (≥50% symptomatic improvement from baseline), clinically significant improvements (≥25% symptomatic improvement from baseline), and remission rates (QIDS-SR16 ≤5) were also calculated., Results: Participants reported significant decreases in depressive symptoms (i.e., as measured by the QIDS-SR16) with repeated ketamine infusions (F(4, 92) = 7.412, p <0.001). The mean QIDS-SR16 score was 17.12 (SD = 5.33) at baseline and decreased to 12.52 (SD = 5.79) following 4 infusions. After 4 infusions, 31% (n = 8) of participants partially responded to IV ketamine, 27% (n = 7) responded, 58% (n = 15) experienced clinically significant improvements, and 10% (n = 3) met remission criteria. Thirty-six participants (69%) experienced treatment-emergent hypertension during at least 1 infusion, and 10 (19%) required intervention with an antihypertensive. Drowsiness was the most commonly reported adverse event (50% of infusions; n = 73)., Conclusion: Ketamine was associated with transient treatment-emergent hypertension. Response and remission rates were comparable to those reported in general adult samples. Findings are limited by the open-label, chart review nature of this study., (Copyright © 2021 American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Herein we evaluate the impact of COVID-19 restrictions on antidepressant effectiveness of intravenous (IV) ketamine in adults with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). We conducted a case series analysis of adults with TRD (n = 267) who received four ketamine infusions at an outpatient clinic in Ontario, Canada, during COVID-19 restrictions (from March 2020 - February 2021; n = 107), compared to patients who received treatment in the previous year (March 2019 - February 2020; n = 160). Both groups experienced significant and comparable improvements in depressive symptoms, suicidal ideation, and anxiety with repeated ketamine infusions. Effectiveness of IV ketamine was not attenuated during the COVID-19 period., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Ketamine may exert pro-cognitive effects on select measures of cognition in adults with mood disorders. We evaluated the effectiveness of intravenous (IV) ketamine on cognition in 68 adult outpatients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) at the Canadian Rapid Treatment Center of Excellence between July 3, 2018 and April 16, 2020 (NCT04209296). Eligibility criteria for the present retrospective study included: primary diagnosis of major depressive or bipolar disorder; currently depressed; and insufficient response to two or more prior treatments. Participants received four infusions of ketamine hydrochloride (0.5-0.75 mg/kg) over 1-2 weeks. We assessed objective and subjective measures of cognition before and after two infusions, i.e., Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), Trail Making Test-B (TMT-B), Patient Deficits Questionnaire, 5-item (PDQ-5-D). Ketamine significantly improved DSST (effect size [ES]=0.60), TMT-B (ES=0.84), as well as PDQ-5-D scores (ES=0.63), indicative of a moderate-to-large effect size. Improvements in DSST and PDQ-5-D with ketamine were mediated by reductions in depressive symptoms, whereas improvements in TMT-B were independent of changes in depressive symptoms. Our results support the independent, rapid-onset, pro-cognitive effects with IV ketamine in adults with TRD. Larger, randomized, controlled trials with ketamine wherein cognition is the primary outcome measure in mood and non-mood disorder samples are warranted., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Numerous clinical trials have reported that intravenous (IV) ketamine demonstrates rapid antidepressant and anti-suicidal effects in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). These studies, however, have not characterized whether these antidepressant effects translate to improvements in workplace productivity and functionality. Adults with TRD received repeated doses of IV ketamine at a community-based clinic (n = 171). We evaluated patient outcomes at two timepoints of interest: (1) acute-phase (i.e., following 4-6 infusions, 17.6 ± 12.6 days from baseline) and (2) maintenance-phase (i.e., following 7-10 infusions, 153.9 ± 63.4 days from baseline). The primary outcome measure was change from baseline to maintenance-phase scores on the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) workplace/school item as well as days underproductive (i.e., presenteeism) and days lost (i.e., absenteeism). Secondary measures included the Quick Inventory for Depression Symptomatology-Self Report 16-Item (QIDS-SR 16 ). There was a significant reduction in workplace/school disability, and significantly reduced symptoms of presenteeism and absenteeism. At the acute-phase outcome, this translated to 2 more days of productivity and 1.5 less days absent from work. Additionally, IV ketamine exhibited a sustained antidepressant effect across the ten infusions. IV ketamine was associated with a significant reduction in workplace/school disability and demonstrated improvements in symptoms of presenteeism and absenteeism., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Depression severity and efficacy measurement scales employed for rapid-acting treatments (e.g., ketamine) were initially validated in adults receiving conventional monoamine-based antidepressants. The emergence of rapid-acting antidepressants in psychiatry provides the impetus for outcome measures that have been validated as sensitive to change with rapid-acting treatments. Herein, we provide results validating the McIntyre and Rosenblat Rapid Response Scale (MARRRS)., Methods: Adults with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) receiving intravenous (IV) ketamine had depressive symptoms measured with the 16-Item Quick Inventory Depressive Symptoms Self-Report (QIDS-SR-16) and MARRRS at baseline and as a repeated measure across an acute course of four infusions. The MARRRS is a self-report measure assessing depressive symptoms during the past 72 hours., Results: Sixty-four patients (M age  = 45.4 ± 13.5) were included. The MARRRS had a high internal consistency across acute infusions as determined by Cronbach's alpha (0.84 to 0.94). There was significant convergent validity between the QIDS-SR-16 and MARRRS total scores across infusions (rs(292) = .87, p < .001); the MARRRS was also sensitive to change (rs(49) = .70, p < .001). Exploratory factor analysis revealed that MARRRS items loaded onto two factors (i.e., dysphoria and psychic anxiety) accounting for 63.4% of the total variance., Limitations: Heterogenous sample of adults with TRD receiving open-label treatment without placebo comparison., Conclusion: The MARRRS is a brief validated self-report metric of depression symptom severity that is sensitive to change with the rapid-acting antidepressant ketamine. Measuring outcomes with the MARRRS informs treatment progress and facilitates treatment decisions in persons receiving the rapid-acting antidepressant ketamine. Studies of other rapid-acting antidepressants should incorporate outcome measures that are validated as sensitive to change with rapid-acting antidepressants., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Replicated international studies have underscored the human and societal costs associated with major depressive disorder. Despite the proven efficacy of monoamine-based antidepressants in major depression, the majority of treated individuals fail to achieve full syndromal and functional recovery with the index and subsequent pharmacological treatments. Ketamine and esketamine represent pharmacologically novel treatment avenues for adults with treatment-resistant depression. In addition to providing hope to affected persons, these agents represent the first non-monoaminergic agents with proven rapid-onset efficacy in major depressive disorder. Nevertheless, concerns remain about the safety and tolerability of ketamine and esketamine in mood disorders. Moreover, there is uncertainty about the appropriate position of these agents in treatment algorithms, their comparative effectiveness, and the appropriate setting, infrastructure, and personnel required for their competent and safe implementation. In this article, an international group of mood disorder experts provides a synthesis of the literature with respect to the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ketamine and esketamine in adults with treatment-resistant depression. The authors also provide guidance for the implementation of these agents in clinical practice, with particular attention to practice parameters at point of care. Areas of consensus and future research vistas are discussed.

Objective: Converging evidence suggests abnormalities in monetary reward processing may underlie the shared pathophysiology between major depressive disorder and obesity. As such, there is a need to parse deficits in specific subcomponents of monetary reward functioning (i.e., valuation, learning and anticipation)., Methods: PsycINFO, Google Scholar and PubMed databases were searched for English-language articles published between database inception to June 6th, 2020. Studies were identified using the following medical search heading (MeSH) terms and search strings: (reward (valuation OR motivation OR anticipation OR learning OR functioning OR decision-making OR reinforcement)) AND ((obesity OR overweight OR obese)., Results: Findings were reviewed from 11 studies evaluating the association between obesity and monetary reward processing. Four studies found significant differences in reward learning in individuals with obesity compared to normal-weight participants. Five studies found body mass index (BMI) to be predictive of willingness to expend effort (i.e., valuation) for a monetary reward. Three studies found changes in neural activations in the ventral striatum during anticipatory phases preceding receipt of a monetary reward in participants with obesity., Conclusions: Participants with obesity demonstrated significantly poorer performance in task-based measures of reward learning, valuation, and anticipation, resulting in lower monetary reward outcomes across all studies compared to healthy controls. Notably, participants with obesity and comorbid depression performed worse than participants with no comorbid depression., Limitations: There persists heterogeneity between studies with regards to inclusion of mood disorder populations and exclusion of psychiatric comorbidities in groups with obesity., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Women are disproportionately represented amongst samples of adults with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Ketamine has demonstrated rapid and robust efficacy in adults with TRD. Herein, we sought to determine whether the effectiveness of intravenous (IV) ketamine was influenced by menopausal status in women with TRD. We defined premenopausal women as those under the age of 45 (n = 52), while postmenopausal women (n = 54) were those over the age of 51. Participants received four IV ketamine infusions over one-to-two weeks at a community-based center for adults with TRD. The primary outcome of interest was the change in depressive symptom severity as measured by the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report 16 (QIDS-SR 16 ) following four infusions, compared to pretreatment. The secondary outcomes were improvements in suicidal ideation (SI; i.e., QIDS-SR 16 SI item), anxiety (i.e., Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale), anhedonic severity (i.e., Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale), and workplace and psychosocial function (i.e., Sheehan Disability Scale). Menopausal status did not influence overall treatment response, F (4, 280) = 1.83, p = .123, η p 2  = 0.025. Both premenopausal and postmenopausal participants demonstrated similar response rates (30% and 26%, respectively) and remission rates (both 13%) to IV ketamine treatment following four infusions. Premenopausal women experienced improvements in social function more rapidly than postmenopausal women, F (2, 174) = 1.65, p = .047, η p 2  = 0.019. Postmenopausal women experienced reduction in SI more rapidly than premenopausal women, F (4, 280) = 2.72, p = .030, η p 2  = 0.037. These preliminary post-hoc findings provide the impetus for future studies to investigate the moderational role of menopausal status, as defined by hormone levels, on response to IV ketamine for TRD., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Dissociation is a treatment-emergent adverse event commonly associated with IV ketamine, often measured using the 23-item Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale (CADSS). The objective of this study was to develop a short form version of the CADSS for easier clinical use., Methods: Retrospective data of 260 patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) receiving IV ketamine were randomly divided into two datasets. The first dataset (n = 130) was leveraged to develop a brief 6-item version of the CADSS (CADSS-6) based on items most sensitive to ketamine-induced dissociation. The CADSS-6 questions were then applied to the second dataset (n = 130) and the Spearman's correlation between the full-length CADSS and the CADSS-6 were assessed., Results: The CADSS-6 was developed from questions 1, 2, 6, 7, 15, and 22 from the full length CADSS. There was a strong significant correlation between the CADSS-6 total score and the CADSS total score at infusions 1 (rs(106) = 0.92, p < 0.001), 2 (rs(100) = 0.91, p < 0.001), 3(rs(99) = 0.95, p < 0.001) and 4 (rs(102) = 0.94, p < 0.001)., Limitations: The CADSS-6 was developed using a retrospective data; therefore, the scale remains unvalidated in this population., Conclusions: The CADSS-6 presented herein was sensitive to dissociation experienced by patients receiving IV ketamine. Overall, the CADSS-6 was strongly correlated at each infusion with the full-length CADSS. While future studies should look to validate the CADSS-6 in a TRD sample, this scale offers clinicians a brief assessment that can be used to characterize symptoms of dissociation., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: To assess the effect of insulin resistance (IR) on treatment response to the antidepressant, vortioxetine, in patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)., Methods: This is a secondary analysis of an 8-week, open-label clinical trial. Ninety-five adults in a primary care setting experiencing a major depressive episode were included. Response to vortioxetine was measured using the THINC-integrated tool, Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS), the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire (PDQ-5), and the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS). Generalized estimating equation models were utilized for data analysis., Results: When adjusted for age, gender, dose, and BMI, there was a significant baseline IR by time interaction for SHAPS (p = 0.022), PDQ-5 (p = 0.037), and SDS (p = 0.013). Higher baseline IR predicted decreased early improvements in anhedonia. It also predicted poorer subjective assessments of cognition and increased functional impairment at the endpoint of treatment. For functional capacity (i.e. SDS) other covariates including severity of symptoms, illness course, other metabolic factors (e.g. cholesterol), and physical activity were included with no changes to the moderating effect of baseline IR., Limitations: This was a post-hoc analysis of a primarily non-diabetic sample. Also, only one agent was assessed., Conclusions: IR was a predictor of response to vortioxetine. This persisted after controlling for other factors including, but not limited to, BMI. These findings strengthen the link between depression and IR and may point to another novel metabolic predictor of response. These findings should be replicated using other antidepressants., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

The efficacy of ketamine in reducing suicidal ideation (SI) has been previously reported. We aimed to evaluate acute anti-SI effects of single-dose ketamine in different formulations/routes of administration by pooling results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A systematic search was conducted on Cochrane, Embase, Medline, and PubMed from inception to July 1st, 2020. Studies were selected based on pre-determined eligibility criteria. Effect sizes of different formulations/routes at various time points were computed using random-effects models. With data from nine eligible RCTs (n = 197), the pooled effect size for anti-SI effects at the 24-h time point was 1.035 (N = 6, CI: 0.793 to 1.277, p < 0.001) for intravenous (IV) racemic ketamine and 1.309 (N = 1, CI: 0.857 to 1.761, p < 0.001) for intranasal (IN) esketamine. An additional five RCTs were available for qualitative analysis. RCTs were identified for oral/sublingual ketamine for depression, however, none of these trials reported anti-SI effects preventing quantitative analysis for these routes of delivery. No RCTs for intramuscular (IM) ketamine were identified. The findings suggest that single-dose IV ketamine/IN esketamine is associated with robust reductions in suicidal thoughts at 2-h, 4-h, and 24-h post-intervention. In addition, future studies on IM/oral/sublingual ketamine and comparative studies are warranted to evaluate the anti-SI efficacy of distinct formulations and routes of administration., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Individuals meeting criteria for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) are differentially affected by high levels of anxiety symptoms., Aims: There is a need to identify the efficacy of novel rapid-onset treatments in adults with mood disorders and comorbid anxious-distress., Methods: This study included patients with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (MDD) or bipolar disorder (BD) who were receiving intravenous (IV) ketamine treatment at a community-based clinic.Anxious-distress was proxied using items from the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report 16-item (QIDS-SR 16 ) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD7) scales. The difference in QIDS-SR 16 total score, QIDS-SR 16 suicidal ideation (SI) item and GAD7 score were analyzed between groups., Results: A total of 209 adults with MDD ( n = 177) and BD ( n = 26) were included in this analysis. From this sample, 94 patients (mean = 45 ± 13.9 years) met the criteria for anxious-distress. Individuals meeting the criteria for anxious-distress exhibited a significantly greater reduction in QIDS-SR 16 total score following four infusions ( p = 0.02) when compared with patients not meeting the anxious-distress criteria. Both anxious-distressed and low-anxiety patients exhibited a significant reduction in SI ( p < 0.0001) following four infusions.Finally, there was a significantly greater reduction in anxiety symptoms in the anxious-distress group compared with the non-anxious distress group following three ( p = 0.02) and four infusions ( p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Patients with TRD and prominent anxiety receiving IV ketamine exhibited a significant reduction in depressive, SI and anxiety symptoms.

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of intravenous (IV) ketamine on anxiety, irritability, agitation, and suicidality, in adults with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (MDD) or bipolar disorder (BD)., Method: Adults (N = 201) with treatment-resistant MDD or BD received repeat-dose IV ketamine treatment at a community-based clinic. Mixed features were measured using symptoms of anxiety, irritability, and agitation (AIA), as measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale. The Quick Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report-16 (QIDS-SR 16 ) was used to measure overall treatment response, and the QIDS-SR 16 suicidal ideation (SI) item was used to measure change in SI symptoms with ketamine treatment. The anxiety, irritability, and agitation items on the GAD-7 were used to assess effectiveness of IV ketamine in treating symptoms of mixed features., Results: In this retrospective analysis, 113 participants met AIA criteria. Participants with AIA experienced a significantly greater reduction in overall depressive symptoms (F(1, 558) = 9.49, P = .002), SI (F(1, 558) = 3.103, P = .079), anxiety (F(1, 198) = 5.52, P = .007), irritability (F(1, 198) = 28.35, P < .001), and agitation as measured by "trouble relaxing" (F(1, 198) = 6.70, P = .010) from baseline compared to the non-AIA group, regardless of number of treatments received., Conclusions: Our preliminary results suggest that IV ketamine is effective in rapidly treating AIA and SI in adults with treatment-resistant mood disorders. This observation suggests that IV ketamine could be considered a treatment alternative for adults with MDD or BD presenting with mixed features., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Ketamine is established as a rapid and effective treatment in adults with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). The availability of different formulations and routes of delivery invites the need for evaluating relative effect sizes., Methods: Effect size with respect to depression symptom reduction for each formulation and route of delivery was compared at discrete time-points (i.e., 24 h, 2-6 days, 7-20 days, 21-28 days) in adults with TRD. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect size across intravenous, intranasal and oral routes of administration. Analysis was also conducted evaluating the effect size of racemic ketamine to esketamine., Results: The pooled effect size for intranasal ketamine/esketamine at 24 h was g = 1.247 (n = 5, 95% CI: 0.591-1.903, p < 0.01). At 2-6 days, the pooled effect size for intravenous ketamine/esketamine was g = 0.949 (n = 14, 95% CI: -0.308-2.206, p = 0.139). At 7-20 days, intranasal ketamine had a pooled effect size of g = 1.018 (n = 4, 95% CI: 0.499-1.538, p < 0.01). At 21-28 days, oral ketamine had a pooled effect size of g = 0.633 (n = 2, 95% CI: 0.368-0.898, p < 0.01)., Limitations: Additional comparative studies are needed with regards to the efficacy of different formulations and routes of delivery., Conclusions: The short-term efficacy of intravenous and intranasal ketamine/esketamine for adults with TRD was established. Interpreting the efficacy of oral ketamine was limited by the need for studies with larger samples across independent sites. No conclusions regarding comparative efficacy of the disparate formulations and routes of delivery can be derived from this analysis. Direct comparative studies are needed to further inform treatment options for TRD., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Anhedonia is a trans-diagnostic, multidimensional phenotype that mediates patient outcomes and suicidality. Convergent evidence suggests that ketamine may be effective in targeting measures of anhedonia in adults with treatment resistant depression (TRD)., Methods: This retrospective, post-hoc analysis included 203 (x̄ = 45 ± 14.6 years of age) patients receiving four infusions of intravenous (IV) ketamine at a community-based clinic. The primary outcome measure was change in anhedonia severity, as measured by the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS). Secondary measures sought to determine if improvement on the SHAPS mediated the effect of repeated IV ketamine infusions on symptoms of depression and suicidal ideations, as measured by the Quick Inventory for Depression Symptomatology-Self Report 16-Item (QIDS-SR 16 ) and anxiety, as measured using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)., Results: After adjusting for age, sex, primary diagnosis, concomitant medication, body mass index, and baseline depression severity, there was a statistically significant reduction in symptoms of anhedonia with IV ketamine treatment (F (2, 235.6) = 31.6, p < 0.001). Improvements in depressive symptoms, suicidal ideation, and anxiety symptoms with repeated-dose IV ketamine were significantly partially mediated by reduction in anhedonic severity. Moreover, the combination of number of infusions received and change in anhedonic severity accounted for 26% of the variance in depressive score improvements., Limitations: This is a post-hoc analysis of retrospective data and lacks a control group., Conclusion: Ketamine was effective in improving measures of anhedonia in this large, well-characterized community-based sample of adults with TRD. Improvements in anhedonia also partially mediated the significant improvement in depressive symptoms, suicidality, and anxiety., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the development and implementation of clinical practice guidelines for the management of depression globally., Methods: We conducted a systematic review of existing guidelines for the management of depression in adults with major depressive or bipolar disorder. For each identified guideline, we assessed compliance with measures of guideline development quality (such as transparency in guideline development processes and funding, multidisciplinary author group composition, systematic review of comparative efficacy research) and implementation (such as quality indicators). We compared guidelines from low- and middle-income countries with those from high-income countries., Findings: We identified 82 national and 13 international clinical practice guidelines from 83 countries in 27 languages. Guideline development processes and funding sources were explicitly specified in a smaller proportion of guidelines from low- and middle-income countries (8/29; 28%) relative to high-income countries (35/58; 60%). Fewer guidelines (2/29; 7%) from low- and middle-income countries, relative to high-income countries (22/58; 38%), were authored by a multidisciplinary development group. A systematic review of comparative effectiveness was conducted in 31% (9/29) of low- and middle-income country guidelines versus 71% (41/58) of high-income country guidelines. Only 10% (3/29) of low- and middle-income country and 19% (11/58) of high-income country guidelines described plans to assess quality indicators or recommendation adherence., Conclusion: Globally, guideline implementation is inadequately planned, reported and measured. Narrowing disparities in the development and implementation of guidelines in low- and middle-income countries is a priority. Future guidelines should present strategies to implement recommendations and measure feasibility, cost-effectiveness and impact on health outcomes., ((c) 2020 The authors; licensee World Health Organization.)

Background: Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a common and debilitating mood disorder. Individuals with MDD are often misdiagnosed or diagnosed in an untimely manner, exacerbating existing functional impairments. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) involves the repeated sampling of an individual's symptoms within their natural environment and has been demonstrated to assist in illness assessment and characterization. Capturing data in this way would set the stage for improved treatment outcomes and serve as a complementary resource in the management and treatment of depressive symptoms., Methods: Online databases PubMed/MedLine and PsycINFO were searched using PRISMA guidelines and combinations of the following keywords: EMA, depression, smartphone app, diagnosing, symptoms, phone, app, ecological momentary assessment, momentary assessment, data mining, unobtrusive, passive data, GPS, sensor., Results: A total of nineteen original articles were identified using our search parameters and ten articles met the inclusion criteria for full-text review. Among the ten relevant studies, three studies evaluated feasibility, seven evaluated detection, and three evaluated treatment of MDD., Limitations: Limitations include that the design of all of the studies included in this review are non-randomized. It should be noted that most of the studies included were pilot studies and/or exploratory trials lacking a control group., Conclusions: Available evidence suggests that the use of passive smartphone-based applications may lead to improved management of depressive symptoms. This review aids the creation of new EMA applications, highlights the potential of EMA usage in clinical settings and drug development, emphasizes the importance for regulation of applications in the mental health field, and provides insight into future directions., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of intravenous (IV) ketamine in adults with treatment resistant depression (TRD) receiving care in real-word settings is insufficiently characterized. Herein, results from a naturalistic, retrospective study are presented from a Canadian outpatient IV ketamine clinic., Methods: Adults (N = 213; M age  = 45) with Major Depressive Disorder or Bipolar Disorder, with a minimum of Stage 2 antidepressant resistance, received IV ketamine at a community-based multi-disciplinary clinic. The primary outcome measure was change from baseline to post-infusion 4 on the Quick Inventory for Depression Symptomatology-Self Report-16 (QIDS-SR 16 ; n = 190). Secondary measures included QIDS-SR 16 -measured response and remission rates, changes from baseline to endpoint in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Scale (GAD-7; n = 188) and the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS; n = 168)., Results: Significant improvement in total depressive symptoms severity (p < 0.0001) was observed after four infusions of IV ketamine 0.5-0.75 mg/kg. Moreover, the response rate (QIDS-SR 16 total score change ≥ 50%) was 27% and remission (QIDS-SR 16 total score ≤5) rate was 13%. Patients receiving IV ketamine exhibited anxiolytic effects (p < 0.0001,), improved overall psychosocial function (p < 0.0001), and reduced suicidal ideation (p < 0.0001). Compared to the baseline infusion, dissociation severity significantly reduced in subsequent infusions., Limitations: This was a naturalistic, retrospective study, without a control group., Conclusions: IV ketamine was safe, well-tolerated, and effective at improving depressive, anxiety, and functional impairment symptoms in a well-characterized cohort of adults with TRD., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Roger S. McIntyre is a consultant to speak on behalf of, and/or has received research support from Alkermes, Lundbeck, Janssen, Shire, Purdue, Pfizer, Otsuka, Allergan, Takeda, Neurocrine, Sunovion, Stanley Medical Research Institute, and CIHR/GACD/Chinese National Natural Research Foundation. Joshua D. Rosenblat has received research grant support from the Canadian Cancer Society, Canadian Psychiatric Association, American Psychiatric Association, American Society of Psychopharmacology, University of Toronto, University Health Network Centre for Mental Health, Joseph M. West Family Memorial Fund and Timeposters Fellowship and industry funding for speaker/consultation/research fees from Allergan, Lundbeck and COMPASS. JDR is the medical director of a private clinic providing intravenous ketamine infusions and intranasal esketamine for depression., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Rigorous clinical trials suggest ketamine is safe and well-tolerated in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). There is a paucity of data on the safety and tolerability of ketamine in community-based clinics treating patients with TRD., Methods: Retrospective data was analyzed from 203 patients with TRD who received repeat-dose IV ketamine. Safety was operationalized as hemodynamic changes. Tolerability was evaluated through the reporting of adverse events and dissociation symptom severity, as measured by the Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale., Results: Ketamine was well-tolerated, with less than 5% of patients withdrawing due to tolerability concerns. Blood pressure significantly increased during infusion, with 44.3% meeting criteria for treatment-emergent hypertension (i.e., blood pressure ≥ 165/100 mmHg). 12% of patients exhibiting hypertension required pharmacological intervention. The most frequently reported adverse events included drowsiness (56.4%), dizziness (45.2%), dissociation (35.6%), and nausea (13.3%). Dissociation severity significantly attenuated after the first infusion, but plateaued for subsequent infusions., Conclusion: Intravenous ketamine was safe and well-tolerated. Hypertension was commonly observed and was often transient. Dissociation was most frequently reported after the first infusion but remained a consistent but not treatment-limiting adverse event thereafter. No patients exhibited psychosis, mania, or new onset suicidality with IV ketamine.

We investigated the efficacy of tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α antagonist infliximab on a measure of anhedonia amongst individuals with bipolar I/II depression (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02363738). Adults (ages 18-65) with bipolar I/II disorder currently experiencing a major depressive episode with a higher probability of inflammatory activity (i.e., meeting one or more of the following inflammatory/metabolic criteria: obesity and dyslipidemia/hypertension, daily cigarette smoking, diabetes mellitus, migraine, inflammatory bowel disease, and/or C-reactive protein level of ⩾5 mg/L) were enrolled in a double-blind, 12-week clinical trial of adjunctive infliximab (5 mg/kg) and saline control, which were administered at weeks 0, 2, and 6. The primary outcome measure for the present secondary analysis was change in the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) total score between placebo- and infliximab-treated subjects from baseline to weeks 6 and 12. Plasma concentrations of TNF-α and soluble TNF receptors (sTNFR) 1 and 2 were assessed at weeks 0, 2, 6, and 12. Sixty eligible adults received treatment with infliximab (n=29) or placebo (n=31); 47 subjects completed the study (infliximab: n=21, placebo: n=26). Overall, infliximab-randomized subjects exhibited significantly larger increases in SHAPS total score, denoting greater reductions in anhedonic symptoms, when compared to placebo-randomized subjects (treatment × time interaction effect: χ 2 =7.15,df=2,p=0.03). Anti-anhedonic efficacy was moderated by baseline plasma levels of TNF-α and sTNFR1, but not by changes in TNF-α or sTNFR1 concentrations. Baseline and changes in sTNFR2 concentrations did not moderate anti-anhedonic efficacy. Infliximab significantly improved a measure of anhedonia relative to placebo in adults with bipolar I/II depression at week 6; intervention efficacy was not sustained 6 weeks after the final infusion., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Metabolically based distinctions for disturbances in glucose and insulin may provide meaningful insights both clinically and mechanistically., Methods: Data were derived from 352 subjects of previously completed clinical studies with a mood disorder (MD) (bipolar disorder: n = 179, major depressive disorder: n = 173) and 218 healthy controls from the Comprehensive Assessment of Long-Term Effects of Reducing Intake of Energy. We conducted a factor analysis to replicate a priori dissociable factors informed by glucose and insulin levels and indices of insulin resistance and beta-cell function: elevated insulin and insulin resistance ("insulin-IR"), and increased fasting glucose and reduced insulin secretion ("glucotoxicity"). Cluster analyses were conducted, separately in men and women, to evaluate the clinical relevance of subtyping individuals with MDs using insulin-IR and glucotoxicity (GT) factor scores., Results: Factors insulin-IR and GT explained 92.64% and 92.09% of the variance in men and women respectively. Three clusters were replicated in men and women separately: metabolically healthy (MH), high GT, and insulin-resistant (IR). After adjusting for age, gender, study cohort, MD diagnosis, and antipsychotics use, body mass index (BMI) and mean arterial pressure were higher in IR- vs GT- or MH-clustered individuals; GT-clustered individuals had more metabolic syndrome components and higher C-reactive protein. Glucotoxic-clustered subjects reported greater impairments in cognitive function and global functioning when compared to MH- or IR-clustered subjects., Conclusions: Using simple, cost-effective, and accessible measures, we identified stable, gender-convergent, subgroups of individuals that significantly diverged on measures of cognitive dysfunction, self-reported anhedonia, functional disability, BMI, and blood pressure., (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Antidepressant pharmacotherapy dominates current treatment in psychiatry, including treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD). However, the current trial-and-error process of medication selection contributes to treatment failure and unnecessarily exposes patients to lengthy and insufficient treatment trials. Notably, improvements in measures of cognition have been demonstrated to occur early during treatment and prior to improvements in clinical state. Cognitions have been categorized based on emotional valence (i.e., cold versus hot cognitions). Cold cognitions describe cognitive operations that are relevant to the processing of non-emotional information. The current analysis investigates whether early changes in cold cognition can predict response after 8 weeks of vortioxetine treatment in adults with MDD. This was secondary analysis of an 8-week, open-label study. Cognition was assessed at week 0 and week 2 to measure early cognitive change. Depressive symptom severity was assessed at week 0 and week 8 to measure treatment response. Eighty-one subjects were analyzed using binomial logistic regression models. Early change in cognition was a non-significant predictor of response (p = 0.845, SE = 0.599, OR = 1.124), which may have resulted from high data variability. The overall predictive accuracy of the model was low (sensitivity = 37.5%, specificity = 89.8%, PPV = 70.6%, NPV = 68.8%). Future studies should include larger samples and stratify patients based on potentially moderating variables, such as baseline cognitive impairment and occupation. Stratification would likely produce more homogenous samples, reducing the amount of variability observed for early cognitive change., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Roger S. McIntyre is a consultant to speak on behalf for, and/or has received research support from Lundbeck, Janssen, Shire, Purdue, Pfizer, Otsuka, Allergan, Takeda, Neurocrine, Sunovion, Stanley Medical Research Institute, and CIHR/GACD/Chinese National Natural Research Foundation. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Sleep disturbances are frequently reported in patients with major depressive disorder. We aimed to investigate the effects of vortioxetine on sleep quality and association between changes in sleep and treatment response., Methods: This study is a post-hoc analysis of a clinical trial that sought to evaluate the sensitivity to cognitive change of THINC-integrated tool in patients with major depressive disorder. In total, 92 patients (aged 18 to 65) meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition criteria for moderate or severe major depressive disorder and 54 healthy controls were included. All patients received open-label vortioxetine (10-20 mg/day, flexibly dosed) for 8 weeks. Herein, the primary outcomes of interest were changes in sleep, as measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Epworth Sleepiness Scale and Insomnia Severity Index, between weeks 0, 2, and 8. The association between changes in sleep and depressive symptom severity was secondarily assessed., Results: We observed that sleep, as indicated by scores of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Epworth Sleepiness Scale and Insomnia Severity Index, was significantly poorer in patients with major depressive disorder compared to healthy controls at weeks 0, 2, and 8 ( p < 0.05). Among patients with major depressive disorder, we observed significant improvements on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Epworth Sleepiness Scale and Insomnia Severity Index between weeks 0 and 8 ( p < 0.05). We observed a significant association between improvements on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and Insomnia Severity Index and improvement of depressive symptoms., Conclusion: Improvement of depressive symptoms in major depressive disorder patients treated with vortioxetine was associated with significant improvements in sleep. Furthermore, improvements in sleep were predictive of antidepressant response and were linearly correlated with improvement in overall depressive symptom severity.

Background: It is well established that deficits in motivation, reward, and cognition are common during and in between syndromal episodes of depression as part of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Informed by evidence indicating functional and structural interconnectivity between cognitive and reward brain circuits, we preliminarily evaluate the association between measures of cognitive performance and reward/motivation., Methods: This is a post-hoc analysis of a primary study (i.e. the THINC-it sensitivity to change study). Adults (18-65 years of age) meeting DSM-5 criteria for MDD, single-episode or recurrent confirmed by M.I.N.I. with moderate severity or greater (i.e. Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale ≥20). All eligible subjects received vortioxetine 10-20 mg open-label for 8 weeks. The Effort Expenditure Reward Task (EEfRT) was the principal measure of motivation and reward. We directly compare the effects of cognitive measures and depressive symptoms on effort-based decision-making using the THINC-it composite score and MADRS total score., Results: Twenty-one participants with MDD (Mean age = 38.47, SD = 12.85) and 20 healthy volunteers (Mean age = 41.50, SD = 14.21) completed the optional EEfRT task. Amongst individuals with MDD, performance in processing speed, executive function (i.e. Trails B) and overall composite cognitive score was positively associated with the proportion of hard-task choices in the high reward condition (i.e. greater reward valuation). Across both groups, a greater probability (χ 2  = 1.137) and magnitude of reward (χ 2  = 0.045) was associated with increased effort (i.e. choosing the hard task more frequently). Using fully factored GEE models, we observed a positive association between performance on the Trails test (β = 2.223, SE = 0.928, p = 0.017) as well as the composite score (β = 0.978, SE = 0.0.459, p = 0.033), and greater effort for high rewards. In addition, it was observed that a positive association (i.e. greater effort for reward in higher probability) was observed with depressive symptoms and overall cognitive measures., Conclusion: Herein, we observed that an association exists between overall cognitive function, notably processing speed and executive function and reward function. Specifically, a greater effort for hard task rewards (using the EEfRT task) was manifested in individuals exhibiting higher levels of cognitive performance in a well-characterized sample of MDD treated with Vortioxetine., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Anhedonia and abnormalities in reward behavior are core features of major depressive disorder (MDD). Convergent evidence indicates that overweight/obesity (OW), a highly prevalent condition in MDD, is independently associated with reward disturbances. We therefore aimed to investigate the moderating effect of OW on the willingness to expend efforts for reward in individuals with MDD and healthy controls (HC)., Methods: Forty-one adults (HC n = 20, MDD n = 21) completed the Effort Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT), clinical and cognitive measures. Anthropometric parameters were assessed in all participants, and an additional evaluation of laboratorial parameters were conducted solely on those with MDD. Individuals with MDD were all on vortioxetine monotherapy (10-20 mg/day)., Results: Interactions between reward magnitude, group and OW were observed (χ 2  = 9.192, p = 0.010); the OW-MDD group chose the hard task significantly less than normal weight (NW)-HC (p = 0.033) and OW-HC (p = 0.034), whereas there were no differences between NW-MDD and HCs. Within individuals with MDD, the proportion of hard task choices was more strongly correlated with body mass index (BMI) (r = -0.456, p = 0.043) and insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR) (r = -0.467, p = 0.038), than with depressive symptoms (r = 0.290, p = 0.214)., Conclusions: OW significantly moderated the association between MDD and willingness to make efforts for rewards. These findings offer novel evidence on the potential role of metabolic factors on the basis of anhedonia, and for the heuristic models proposing a pathophysiological connection between mood and metabolic disorders., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a mental disorder characterized by aberrant emotion regulation. The capacity for emotion regulation stems from diverse neural circuits including higher level cognitive structures involved in processing contextual information, and lower level limbic structures involved in triggering emotional expression. Cognitive theories of depression posit that the MDD-specific abnormalities in emotional control derive itself from dysfunctional cognitive processes including biased attention, rumination, and altered information processing and memory. The main objectives of the current narrative review are to summarize the major neural systems involved in emotion regulation in humans, and to describe how these systems are dysregulated in MDD. The findings will be briefly discussed in the context of a conceptual framework of depression (i.e., Beck's cognitive model of depression), and neural targets of conventional treatments for depression will also be discussed. MDD exemplifies the critical importance of appropriate emotion regulation to human health and wellbeing, and demonstrates the personal and social impact of emotion dysregulation., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Environmental stressors, such as childhood maltreatment, have been recognized to contribute to the development of depression. Growing evidence suggests that epigenetic changes are a key mechanism by which stressors interact with the genome leading to stable changes in DNA structure, gene expression, and behaviour. The current review aimed to evaluate the relationship between stress-associated epigenetic changes and depression. Human studies were identified via systematic searching of PubMed/Medline from inception to February 2018. Seventeen articles were identified. Stress-associated epigenetic changes in the following genes were correlated with depression: NRC31, SLCA4, BDNF, FKBP5, SKA2, OXTR, LINGO3, POU3F1 and ITGB1. Epigenetic changes in glucocorticoid signaling (e.g., NR3C1, FKBP5), serotonergic signaling (e.g. SLC6A4), and neurotrophin (e.g., BDNF) genes appear to be the most promising therapeutic targets for future research. However, continued research is warranted due to inconsistent findings regarding the directionality of epigenetic modification. Future studies should also aim to control for the use of psychotropic agents due to their widespread use in depressed populations and established effects on DNA methylation., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Anhedonia is defined as a diminished ability to experience interest or pleasure, and is a critical psychopathological dimension of major depressive disorder (MDD). The purpose of the current systematic review is to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of pharmacological treatments on measures of anhedonia in adults with MDD. Electronic databases Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to June 1, 2018 for longitudinal studies utilizing pharmacotherapy for the treatment of anhedonia in patients with MDD. A total of 17 eligible studies were identified (i.e., evaluated the effects of pharmacotherapy on a measure of anhedonia). Among the identified studies, the efficacy of 14 different pharmacotherapies on measures of anhedonia were evaluated, including melatonergic agents (i.e. agomelatine), monoaminergic agents (i.e. moclobemide, clomipramine, bupropion, venlafaxine, fluoxetine, amitifadine and levomilnacipran, escitalopram, and sertraline), glutamatergic agents (i.e., ketamine and riluzole), stimulants (i.e., methylphenidate), and psychedelics (i.e., psilocybin). Based on the available evidence, most antidepressants demonstrated beneficial effects on measures of anhedonia as well as the other depressive symptoms. Only escitalopram/riluzole combination treatment was ineffective in treating symptoms of anhedonia in MDD. Continued research is warranted to further support the efficacy of mechanistically-distinct antidepressants in treating symptoms of anhedonia in MDD. Future research should also aim to parse out the heterogeneous effects of different pharmacotherapies on anhedonic symptoms., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Intravenous (IV) ketamine has rapid and robust antidepressant effects; however, poor accessibility of the IV route often limits its use. Numerous alternative routes of administration are being investigated. Oral ketamine is particularly appealing for its ease of use with the potential for high accessibility. The objective of the current systematic review, in accordance with PRISMA, is to determine the efficacy, safety, tolerability, and dose range of oral ketamine for bipolar and unipolar depression., Data Sources: The MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were systematically searched for relevant articles, written in English, published prior to July 2018 using relevant keywords for all variants of ketamine, oral, and depression., Study Selection: All clinical studies assessing oral ketamine for bipolar or unipolar depression were included. A total of 13 published articles were identified, of which 2 were proof-of-concept, randomized controlled trials (RCTs); 1 was a prospective open-label trial; 5 were retrospective chart reviews; and 5 were case reports., Data Extraction: Included articles were qualitatively analyzed to determine antidepressant efficacy, tolerability, safety, dose range, antisuicide effects, time to effect, and efficacy in treatment-resistant depression and study bias., Results: Both RCTs demonstrated antidepressant efficacy with good tolerability; however, significant changes in depressive symptom severity were observed only after 2-6 weeks of treatment (P < .05). Both RCTs had high risk for bias, due to inadequate intent-to-treat analysis and adverse effect monitoring. Rapid antidepressant effects (ie, within 24 hours), antisuicide effects, and efficacy in treatment-resistant depression were reported only in retrospective studies. Dosages and frequency of administration were variable (ie, 0.5-7.0 mg/kg 3 times daily to once monthly), with most studies providing dosages of 1-2 mg/kg every 1-3 days. No clinically significant adverse effects were reported., Conclusions: A small number of clinical studies assessed the antidepressant effects of oral ketamine. Initial results suggest that oral ketamine has significant antidepressant effects with good overall tolerability; however, antidepressant effects are not as rapid as those associated with IV ketamine. Antisuicide effects and efficacy in treatment-resistant depression have yet to be demonstrated. Additional well-designed RCTs are warranted., (© Copyright 2019 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.)

Cognitive dysfunction is a symptomatic domain identified across many mental disorders. Cognitive deficits in individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) contribute significantly to occupational and functional disability. Notably, cognitive subdomains such as learning and memory, executive functioning, processing speed, and attention and concentration are significantly impaired during, and between, episodes in individuals with MDD. Most antidepressants have not been developed and/or evaluated for their ability to directly and independently ameliorate cognitive deficits. Multiple interacting neurobiological mechanisms (eg, neuroinflammation) are implicated as subserving cognitive deficits in MDD. A testable hypothesis, with preliminary support, posits that improving performance across cognitive domains in individuals with MDD may improve psychosocial function, workplace function, quality of life, and other patient-reported outcomes, independent of effects on core mood symptoms. Herein we aim to (1) provide a rationale for prioritizing cognitive deficits as a therapeutic target, (2) briefly discuss the neurobiological substrates subserving cognitive dysfunction, and (3) provide an update on current and future treatment avenues.

Background: The aim of this study was to examine the role of perceived sleep quality in predicting subjective as well as objective cognitive function in adults with major depressive disorder (MDD)., Methods: Adults with recurrent MDD (n = 100) experiencing a major depressive episode of at least moderate severity and age-, sex-, and education-matched healthy controls (HC) (n = 100) were recruited to participate in a clinical trial validating the THINC-integrated tool (THINC-it; NCT02508493) for cognitive function. The THINC-it includes subjective and objective measures of cognitive function. Sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)., Results: Compared with HC, individuals with MDD reported significantly poorer sleep quality, as assessed by domain and global PSQI scores (all P values <.05). Both perceived sleep quality ( P < .001) and depression severity (P = .002) were found to independently predict impairments in subjective cognitive performance. Only perceived sleep quality predicted objective cognitive impairments (P = .017). Exploratory mediation analysis revealed depression severity to be a partial mediator of the relationship between perceived sleep quality and subjective cognitive performance (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.56, -0.33)., Conclusions: The results indicate that the subjective and objective cognitive impairments are differentially related to perceived sleep quality and depression severity and emphasize the importance of treating sleep disturbances in MDD.

Background: Pharmacogenomic testing has recently become scalable and available to guide the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). The objective of the current meta-analysis was to determine if guidance from pharmacogenomic testing results in relatively higher rates of remission and response compared to treatment as usual (i.e., 'unguided' trial-and-error method) in adults with MDD., Methods: Article databases were systematically searched from inception to December 2, 2017 for human studies assessing the clinical utility of pharmacogenomics in the acute treatment of MDD. Treatment outcomes in MDD may be defined continuously or categorically (i.e., response/remission). Herein, we delimit our focus on categorical outcomes. Using a random-effects model, data was pooled to determine the risk ratio (RR) of response and remission, respectively, in the pharmacogenomic-guided treatment group compared to the unguided group., Results: Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and two open-label, controlled cohort studies were included. The pooled RR for treatment response comparing guided versus unguided treatment was 1.36 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.14 to 1.62; p = 0.0006; n = 799) in favour of guided treatment. The pooled RR for remission was 1.74 (95%CI = 1.09 to 2.77; p = 0.02, n = 735) also in favour of guided treatment. Heterogeneity in study results suggest that different genetic tests may variably impact response and remission rates., Limitations: The available evidence is limited, with significant methodological deficiencies., Conclusion: The current analysis provides preliminary support for improved response and remission rates in MDD when treatment is guided by pharmacogenomics., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Despite the widespread use of antidepressants in clinical practice, the current trial-and-error approach to medication selection contributes to treatment failure and underscores the need to identify reliable predictors of antidepressant response. Since changes in measures of cognition have been reported to occur early in treatment and prior to improvements in overall mood symptoms, the present review aims to determine whether early changes in measures of cognition can predict response in individuals with MDD., Methods: A systematic review of studies evaluating early cognitive change as a predictor of later treatment response in MDD was conducted using PubMed/Medline, Embase and PsychINFO., Results: A total of seven articles were identified. The available evidence suggests the early changes in cognition may predict treatment response in individuals with MDD. This was shown across antidepressant classes (i.e., SSRIs, SNRIs, NRIs, melatonergic antidepressants) and forms of therapy (i.e., pharmacotherapy, rTMS). The results depict an emerging trend towards early changes in facial emotion recognition (i.e., a hot cognitive process) as a predictor of treatment outcome., Limitations: Our qualitative analysis reflects a very limited number of studies. Moreover, there was significant heterogeneity in the evaluation of cognition across studies. Future research should aim to parse out this heterogeneity by evaluating the relative predictive value of different measures of cognition., Conclusion: The identification of reliable early treatment predictors of antidepressant response would be clinically significant, enabling clinicians to more accurately evaluate the efficacy of selected treatment avenues., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: We sought to characterize the clinical experience of outpatients treated with brexpiprazole after achieving suboptimal outcomes with aripiprazole or bupropion as determined by the treating psychiatric provider., Design and Methods: Case series; inefficacy, intolerability, or other unsatisfactory outcome to previous trial with aripiprazole or bupropion., Findings: The majority of individuals in our sample exhibited tolerability of brexpiprazole. In addition, reduction in mean PHQ-9 scores was observed with brexpiprazole treatment., Implications: The results of our preliminary analysis suggest that a subpopulation of adults who have insufficient outcomes on aripiprazole or bupropion due to intolerability, inefficacy or other unsatisfactory outcome may benefit by switching to brexpiprazole treatment. Larger randomized controlled trials are needed, as well as sophisticated network analysis to further understand efficacy and tolerability differences between atypical antipsychotics., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background and Objectives: This study evaluated the association between self-reported anxiety and objective/subjective measures of cognitive performance in adults with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)., Methods: Acutely depressed subjects with recurrent MDD (n = 100) and age-, sex-, and education-matched healthy controls (HC; n = 100) between the ages of 18 and 65 completed the cross-sectional validation study of the THINC-integrated tool (THINC-it; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02508493). Objective cognitive performance was assessed using the THINC-it, and subjective cognitive impairment with the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire for Depression-5-item. Subjects also completed the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7-item (GAD-7) questionnaire., Results: Subjects with MDD reported significantly more anxiety symptoms, as assessed by the GAD-7, compared to HC (p < 0.001). Linear regression analysis determined that anxiety symptoms significantly accounted for 70.4% of the variability in subjective cognitive impairment, adjusting for depression severity. Moreover, subjects' ratings of the difficulties caused by their anxiety were reported as significantly more severe among subjects with MDD when compared to HC (p < 0.001). Likewise, greater self-reported difficulties with anxiety significantly predicted 57.8% of the variability in subjective cognitive impairment, adjusting for depression severity. Neither anxiety symptoms nor impairment due to anxiety symptoms predicted objective cognitive performance., Limitations: Subjects were not prospectively verified to have a clinical diagnosis of GAD. Rather, this study examined the relationships between symptoms of generalized anxiety, assessed using a brief screening tool, and subjective and objective cognitive function., Conclusions: Results from the current study indicate that adults with MDD and high levels of self-reported anxiety are significantly more likely to report experiencing subjective cognitive dysfunction., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: There is a need for a brief, reliable, valid, and sensitive assessment tool for screening cognitive deficits in patients with Major Depressive Disorders. This paper examines the psychometric characteristics of THINC-it, a cognitive assessment tool composed of four objective measures of cognition and a self-rated assessment, in subjects without mental disorders., Methods: N = 100 healthy controls with no current or past history of depression were tested on four sequential assessments to examine temporal stability, reliability, and convergent validity of the THINC-it tests. We examined temporal reliability across 1 week and stability via three consecutive assessments. Consistency of assessment by the study rater (intrarater reliability) was calculated using the data from the second and third of these consecutive assessments., Results: Test-retest reliability correlations varied between Pearson's r = 0.75 and 0.8. Intrarater reliability between 0.7 and 0.93. Stability for the primary measure for each test yielded within-subject standard deviation values between 5.9 and 11.23 for accuracy measures and 0.735 and 17.3 seconds for latency measures. Convergent validity for three tasks was in the acceptable range, but low for the Symbol Check task., Conclusions: Analysis shows high levels of reliability and stability. Levels of convergent validity were modest but acceptable in the case of all but one test., (© 2018 The Authors International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Learning Objectives: After participating in this activity, learners should be better able to:• Characterize cognitive dysfunction in patients with major depressive disorder.• Evaluate approaches to treating cognitive dysfunction in patients with major depressive disorder., Abstract: Cognitive dysfunction is a core psychopathological domain in major depressive disorder (MDD) and is no longer considered to be a pseudo-specific phenomenon. Cognitive dysfunction in MDD is a principal determinant of patient-reported outcomes, which, hitherto, have been insufficiently targeted with existing multimodal treatments for MDD. The neural structures and substructures subserving cognitive function in MDD overlap with, yet are discrete from, those subserving emotion processing and affect regulation. Several modifiable factors influence the presence and extent of cognitive dysfunction in MDD, including clinical features (e.g., episode frequency and illness duration), comorbidity (e.g., obesity and diabetes), and iatrogenic artefact. Screening and measurement tools that comport with the clinical ecosystem are available to detect and measure cognitive function in MDD. Notwithstanding the availability of select antidepressants capable of exerting procognitive effects, most have not been sufficiently studied or rigorously evaluated. Promising pharmacological avenues, as well as psychosocial, behavioral, chronotherapeutic, and complementary alternative approaches, are currently being investigated.