Back to Search Start Over

Development and implementation of guidelines for the management of depression: a systematic review.

Authors :
Lee Y
Brietzke E
Cao B
Chen Y
Linnaranta O
Mansur RB
Cortes P
Kösters M
Majeed A
Tamura JK
Lui LMW
Vinberg M
Keinänen J
Kisely S
Naveed S
Barbui C
Parker G
Owolabi M
Nishi D
Lee J
Srisurapanont M
Gill H
Guo L
Balanzá-Martínez V
Partonen T
Nolen WA
Lee JH
Kim JH
Chavannes NH
Ewais T
Atienza-Carbonell B
Silven AV
Yasuma N
Gil A
Novikov A
Lacey C
Versluis A
von Malortie S
Chan LF
Waqas A
Purgato M
Aardoom JJ
Ly-Uson JT
Sim K
Tuineag M
van der Kleij RMJJ
van Luenen S
Suttajit S
Hajek T
Lee YW
Porter RJ
Alsuwaidan M
Rosenblat JD
Ravindran AV
Lam RW
McIntyre RS
Source :
Bulletin of the World Health Organization [Bull World Health Organ] 2020 Oct 01; Vol. 98 (10), pp. 683-697H. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Aug 27.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the development and implementation of clinical practice guidelines for the management of depression globally.<br />Methods: We conducted a systematic review of existing guidelines for the management of depression in adults with major depressive or bipolar disorder. For each identified guideline, we assessed compliance with measures of guideline development quality (such as transparency in guideline development processes and funding, multidisciplinary author group composition, systematic review of comparative efficacy research) and implementation (such as quality indicators). We compared guidelines from low- and middle-income countries with those from high-income countries.<br />Findings: We identified 82 national and 13 international clinical practice guidelines from 83 countries in 27 languages. Guideline development processes and funding sources were explicitly specified in a smaller proportion of guidelines from low- and middle-income countries (8/29; 28%) relative to high-income countries (35/58; 60%). Fewer guidelines (2/29; 7%) from low- and middle-income countries, relative to high-income countries (22/58; 38%), were authored by a multidisciplinary development group. A systematic review of comparative effectiveness was conducted in 31% (9/29) of low- and middle-income country guidelines versus 71% (41/58) of high-income country guidelines. Only 10% (3/29) of low- and middle-income country and 19% (11/58) of high-income country guidelines described plans to assess quality indicators or recommendation adherence.<br />Conclusion: Globally, guideline implementation is inadequately planned, reported and measured. Narrowing disparities in the development and implementation of guidelines in low- and middle-income countries is a priority. Future guidelines should present strategies to implement recommendations and measure feasibility, cost-effectiveness and impact on health outcomes.<br /> ((c) 2020 The authors; licensee World Health Organization.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1564-0604
Volume :
98
Issue :
10
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33177758
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.20.251405