Search

Every year in Italy, there are about 20,000 road accidents involving pedestrians, with a significant number of injuries and deaths. Out of these, about 30% occur at pedestrian crossings, where pedestrians should be protected the most. Here, we propose a new accident prediction model to improve pedestrian safety assessments that allows us to accurately identify the sites with the largest potential safety improvements and define the best treatments to be applied. The accident prediction model was developed using the ISTAT dataset, including information about the fatal and injurious crashes that occurred in Italy in a 5-year period. The model allowed us to estimate the risk level of a road section through a machine-learning approach. Gradient Boosting seems to be an appropriate tool to fit classification models for its flexibility that allows us to capture non-linear relationships that would be difficult to detect via a classical approach. The results show the ability of the model to perform an accurate analysis of the sites included in the dataset. The locations analyzed have been classified based on the potential risk in the following three classes: High, medium, and low. The proposed model represents a solid and reliable tool for practitioners to perform accident analysis with pedestrian involvement.

The single-arm phase II CAVE mCRC trial evaluated the combination of cetuximab plus avelumab as rechallenge strategy in RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients, with clinical response to first-line anti-EGFR-based chemotherapy, who progressed and received a subsequent line of therapy. The correlation of skin toxicity (ST) and different clinico-molecular variables with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate (RR) was assessed at univariate and multivariate analysis. A total of 33/77 (42.9%) patients experienced grade 2–3 ST and displayed median OS (mOS) of 17.8 months (CI 95%, 14.9–20.6), whereas 44/77 (57.1%) patients with grade 0–1 ST exhibited mOS of 8.2 months (CI 95%, 5.5–10.9), (hazard ratio (HR), 0.51, CI 95%, 0.29–0.89, p = 0.019). Median PFS (mPFS) was 4.6 months (CI 95%, 3.4–5.7) in patients with grade 2–3 ST, compared to patients with grade 0–1 ST with mPFS of 3.4 months (CI 95%, 2.7–4.1, HR, 0.49, CI 95%, 0.3–0.8, p = 0.004). Grade 2–3 ST (HR, 0.51, p = 0.019) and RAS/BRAF/EGFR WT circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) (HR, 0.50, CI 95%, 0.27–0.9, p = 0.019) had a statistically significant effect on OS at univariate analysis. At the multivariate analysis, RAS/BRAF/EGFR WT ctDNA status maintained statistical significance (HR, 0.49, p = 0.023), whereas there was a trend towards ST grade 2–3 (HR, 0.54, CI 95%, 0.29–1.01, p = 0.054). Skin toxicity is a promising biomarker to identify patients with mCRC that could benefit of anti-EGFR rechallenge.

Simple Summary HCC is a very aggressive disease and patients diagnosed in an advanced/metastatic setting obtain poor survival outcomes with standard treatments. In recent years, the introduction of immunotherapy strategies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors as single agents and in combination with already approved local and systemic treatments, has strongly changed the therapeutic landscape of HCC. Soon, the discovery of novel potential immune targets, together with the understanding of potential biomarkers of resistance, will help to better define novel treatment opportunities for patients with HCC. Abstract Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. The use of local treatment, such as surgical resection, liver transplant, and local ablation, has improved the survival of patients with HCC detected at an early stage. Until recently, the treatment of patients with metastatic disease was limited to the use of the multikinase inhibitor (MKI) sorafenib with a marginal effect on survival outcome. New target approaches, such as the oral MKI lenvatinib in first-line treatment and regorafenib, ramucirumab, and cabozantinib in later lines of therapy, have demonstrated efficacy in patients with preserved liver function (Child–Pugh class A) and good performance status. On the other hand, the implementation of immune checkpoint inhibitors directed against PD-1 (nivolumab and pembrolizumab), PD-L1 (atezolizumab), and anti-CTLA4 (ipilimumab) in the management of advanced HCC has strongly changed the continuum of care of HCC. Future research should include the evaluation of molecular biomarkers that can help patient selection and provide new insight on potential combined approaches. In this review, we provide an overview of the clinical evidence of the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in HCC, and discuss how immunotherapy has been implemented into the continuum of HCC care.

A better knowledge of the complex interactions between cancer cells and the immune system has led to novel immunotherapy approaches. Treatment with selective anti-PD1, anti-PD-L1 and/or anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) has been a revolution in the therapeutic scenario of several cancer types, with the highest clinical efficacy in melanoma and in lung cancer. Colorectal cancer is one of the tumours in which immunotherapy has been shown less effective. Whereas in deficient mismatch repair (MMR) or in highly microsatellite instable (MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer there is clear clinical evidence for a therapeutic role of immune checkpoint inhibitors, the vast majority of patients with proficient MMR or with microsatellite stable (MSS) tumours do not benefit from immunotherapy. Defining the molecular mechanisms for immunogenicity in metastatic colorectal cancer is needed in order to develop predictive biomarkers and effective therapeutic combination strategies. A major challenge will be to identify, among the heterogeneous spectrum of this disease, those patients with specific tumour and tumour infiltrating stroma molecular and functional characteristics, that could be effectively treated with immunotherapy. In this review, we discuss the role of immune response in the context of metastatic colorectal cancer. We summarize the available clinical data with the use of anti PD-1/PD-L1 mAbs as single agents or in combination with anti CTLA-4 mAbs in MSI-H patients. Finally, we address the challenges and the potential strategies for rendering the more frequent microsatellite stable (MSS) tumours "immune-competent" and, therefore, amenable for effective immunotherapy interventions.

Cancer immunotherapy has produced an unprecedented durable response rate, thus shifting from traditional doublet chemotherapy to immunotherapy-based treatments with and without chemotherapy as the first line strategies for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients without a molecular driver. However, the majority of patients do not benefit from the treatment or may relapse after a period of response. As few treatment options are available after failure of cancer immunotherapy, including the combination of chemotherapy and anti-angiogenic drugs, a better understanding of the mechanisms limiting cancer immunotherapy may be of help in the definition of the best second line. Whereas only retrospective data support an immunotherapy rechallenge approach, new combination strategies including immunotherapy and cell-signaling inhibitors or double immunotherapy represent the newest and most promising strategy to overcome primary or acquired resistance to first line immunotherapy.

Simple Summary The survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been improved over the years and now reaches 30–40 months. However, few therapeutic options are available after failure of first- and second-line treatments. In fact, prognosis of chemo-refractory mCRC remains poor. Therefore, new therapeutic strategies are needed. Emerging evidence suggest that retreatment with epidermal growth factor (EGFR) inhibitors after a treatment break, in patients that obtained a clinical benefit by previous anti-EGFR, could lead to prolonged survival. The rationale beyond this “rechallenge” strategy is that after a “treatment holiday” EGFR resistant cancer cells decay, restoring the sensibility to EGFR blockade. In this review we analyze the current knowledge of retreatment with EGFR inhibitors, examine the role of novel biomarkers that can guide the appropriate selection of patients. Finally, we discuss future perspectives and on-going clinical trials. Abstract The prognosis of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who progressed to the first and the second lines of treatment is poor. Thus, new therapeutic strategies are needed. During the last years, emerging evidence suggests that retreatment with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) in the third line of mCRC patients, that have previously obtained clinical benefit by first-line therapy with anti-EGFR MAbs plus chemotherapy, could lead to prolonged survival. The rationale beyond this “rechallenge” strategy is that, after disease progression to first line EGFR-based therapy, a treatment break from anti-EGFR drugs results in RAS mutant cancer cell decay, restoring the sensitivity of cancer cells to cetuximab and panitumumab. In fact, rechallenge treatment with anti-EGFR drugs has shown promising clinical activity, particularly in patients with plasma RAS and BRAF wild type circulating tumor DNA, as defined by liquid biopsy analysis at baseline treatment. The aim of this review is to analyze the current knowledge on rechallenge and to investigate the role of novel biomarkers that can guide the appropriate selection of patients that could benefit from this therapeutic strategy. Finally, we discuss on-going trials and future perspectives.

Inhibidor de BRAF; Binimetinib; Cáncer de colon BRAF inhibitor; Binimetinib; Colon cancer Inhibidor de BRAF; Binimetinib; Càncer de còlon Introduction: BRAF driver mutations are found in up to 15% of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and lead to constitutive activation of BRAF kinase and sustained RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway signaling. BRAF mutations define a sub-population characterized by a poor prognosis and dismal median survival. Following successful outcomes with BRAF inhibition in BRAF mutant metastatic melanoma, this approach was evaluated in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The development and combination of targeted therapies against multiple signaling pathways has proved particularly successful, with improved survival and response rates. Areas covered: This review addresses the development of therapeutic strategies with inhibitors targeting MAPK/ERK and EGFR signaling in BRAF V600E mutated mCRC, focusing on encorafenib, binimetinib and cetuximab. A pharmacological and clinical review of these drugs and the therapeutic approaches behind their optimization are presented. Expert opinion: Exploiting knowledge of the mechanisms of resistance to BRAF inhibitors has been crucial to developing effective therapeutic strategies in BRAF-V600E mutant mCRC. The BEACON trial is a successful example of this approach, using encorafenib and cetuximab with or without binimetinib in patients with previously treated BRAF V600E mutant mCRC, showing an impressive improvement in clinical outcomes and tolerable toxicity compared with chemotherapy, establishing a new standard of care in this setting. The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by grants from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) FIS/FEDER (PI17/00947, PI20/00968) and from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 635342.

The heterogenous nature of colorectal cancer (CRC) renders it a major clinical challenge. Increasing genomic understanding of CRC has improved our knowledge of this heterogeneity and the main cancer drivers, with significant improvements in clinical outcomes. Comprehensive molecular characterization has allowed clinicians a more precise range of treatment options based on biomarker selection. Furthermore, this deep molecular understanding likely extends therapeutic options to a larger number of patients. The biological associations of consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) with clinical outcomes in localized CRC have been validated in retrospective clinical trials. The prognostic role of CMS has also been confirmed in the metastatic setting, with CMS2 having the best prognosis, whereas CMS1 tumors are associated with a higher risk of progression and death after chemotherapy. Similarly, according to mesenchymal features and immunosuppressive molecules, CMS1 responds to immunotherapy, whereas CMS4 has a poorer prognosis, suggesting that a CMS1 signature could identify patients who may benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors regardless of microsatellite instability (MSI) status. The main goal of these comprehensive analyses is to switch from "one marker-one drug" to "multi-marker drug combinations" allowing oncologists to give "the right drug to the right patient." Despite the revealing data from transcriptomic analyses, the high rate of intra-tumoral heterogeneity across the different CMS subgroups limits its incorporation as a predictive biomarker. In clinical practice, when feasible, comprehensive genomic tests should be performed to identify potentially targetable alterations, particularly in RAS/BRAF wild-type, MSI, and right-sided tumors. Furthermore, CMS has not only been associated with clinical outcomes and specific tumor and patient phenotypes but also with specific microbiome patterns. Future steps will include the integration of clinical features, genomics, transcriptomics, and microbiota to select the most accurate biomarkers to identify optimal treatments, improving individual clinical outcomes. In summary, CMS is context specific, identifies a level of heterogeneity beyond standard genomic biomarkers, and offers a means of maximizing personalized therapy.

Background Despite the advancements in new therapies for colorectal cancer (CRC), chemotherapy still constitutes the mainstay of the medical treatment. For this reason, new strategies to increase the efficacy of chemotherapy are desirable. Poly-ADP-Ribose Polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have shown to increase the activity of DNA damaging chemotherapeutics used in the treatment of CRC, however previous clinical trials failed to validate these results and pointed out dose-limiting toxicities that hamper the use of such combinations in unselected CRC patients. Nevertheless, in these studies little attention was paid to the mutational status of homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes. Methods We tested the combination of the PARPi niraparib with either 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin or irinotecan (SN38) in a panel of 12 molecularly annotated CRC cell lines, encompassing the 4 consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs). Synergism was calculated using the Chou-Talalay method for drug interaction. A correlation between synergism and genetic alterations in genes involved in homologous recombination (HR) repair was performed. We used clonogenic assays, mice xenograft models and patient-derived 3D spheroids to validate the results. The induction of DNA damage was studied by immunofluorescence. Results We showed that human CRC cell lines, as well as patient-derived 3D spheroids, harboring pathogenic ATM mutations are significantly vulnerable to PARPi/chemotherapy combination at low doses, regardless of consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) and microsatellite status. The strongest synergism was shown for the combination of niraparib with irinotecan, and the presence of ATM mutations was associated to a delay in the resolution of double strand breaks (DSBs) through HRR and DNA damage persistence. Conclusions This work demonstrates that a numerically relevant subset of CRCs carrying heterozygous ATM mutations may benefit from the combination treatment with low doses of niraparib and irinotecan, suggesting a new potential approach in the treatment of ATM-mutated CRC, that deserves to be prospectively validated in clinical trials.

INTRODUCTION: There have been significant developments in colorectal cancer (CRC) research over the last few years, with the introduction of new agents that have been prolonged median overall survival of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). These therapies have improved patient outcomes; however, despite significant progress in strategies for cancer treatment, their use is limited by development of resistant mechanism. Almost 30% of patients with refractory mCRC will remain good candidates for further treatment. Regorafenib and TAS-102 are novel antitumor agents for patients with refractory mCRC. However, it is unclear which patients may derive a survival benefit from these drugs in real-life clinical practice.; METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis evaluating safety and efficacy of TAS-102 and regorafenib in a cohort of refractory mCRC patients, in 3 different centers between January 1 2018 and May 31 2020, with the aim of assessing the optimal sequence treatment for these 2 drugs.; RESULTS: One hundred and forty mCRC patients were included in the analysis. Of these patients, 64 received regorafenib and 76 received TAS-102 as first treatment. After progression, in the regorafenib 24 (37%) patients switched to secondary treatment with TAS-102, instead, in the TAS-102 group, among 76 patients, 29 (45%) patients switched to secondary treatment with regorafenib. Disease control was achieved in 8 (12.5%) of 64 patients in the regorafenib group and 17 (22.4%) of 76 patients in the TAS-102 group. In terms of efficacy, the PFS and OS were similar in both treatment groups for primary and secondary treatments. AEs reported in this analysis were mostly consistent with the known safety profiles of regorafenib and TAS-102 in previous clinical trials.; CONCLUSION: The present study is the first one to compare the activity of the two agents in a large cohort of chemo-refractory mCRC patients providing more details about the best sequence, to be incorporated in clinical practice. Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common diagnosed tumour in men and the second in women. In countries with surveillance programs, mortality has declined progressively due to increased detection of early tumours, amenable to definitive treatment. Environmental and genetic factors play key roles in its aetiology. Three mechanisms are implicated in CRC carcinogenesis: chromosomal instability (CIN), microsatellite instability (MSI) and CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP). Colon and rectal tumours are biologically considered as a unique entity; however rectal cancer management differs from colon cancer with regard to perioperative treatment. An appropriate diagnostic work-up, within the multidisciplinary team, is important to define CRC therapeutic strategy.

IMPORTANCE: Rechallenge therapy with anti–epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) drugs has been suggested in patients with chemo-refractory RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) after initial response to anti–EGFR-based first-line treatment. The association of treatment with cetuximab plus avelumab with overall survival (OS) may be worthy of investigation in this setting. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of cetuximab rechallenge therapy plus avelumab. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This single-arm, multicenter phase 2 trial enrolled patients from August 2018 to February 2020. Eligible patients with RAS WT mCRC had a complete or partial response to first-line chemotherapy plus anti-EGFR drugs, developed acquired resistance, and failed second-line therapy. Baseline circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and EGFR-S492R mutation analysis was done. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received avelumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks) and cetuximab (400 mg/m(2) and, subsequently, 250 mg/m(2) weekly) until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was OS. Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and safety. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients were enrolled (42 men, 35 women; median age, 63 years); 71 had microsatellite stable tumors (MSS), 3 microsatellite instability-high tumors (MSI-H), 3 unknown. The study met the primary end point, with median OS (mOS) of 11.6 months (95% CI, 8.4-14.8 months). Median PFS (mPFS) was 3.6 months (95% CI, 3.2-4.1 months). Common grade-3 adverse events were cutaneous eruption, 11 (14%), and diarrhea, 3 (4%). For 67 of 77 (87%) patients, baseline analysis of plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and EGFR-S492R variations was feasible. Forty-eight patients had WT disease, whereas 19 had mutations. Patients with RAS/BRAF WT ctDNA had mOS of 17.3 months (95% CI, 12.5-22.0 months) compared with 10.4 months (95% CI, 7.2-13.6 months) in patients with mutated ctDNA (hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% CI, 0.27-0.90; P = .02). The mPFS was 4.1 months (95% CI, 2.9-5.2 months) in RAS/BRAF WT patients compared with 3.0 months (95% CI, 2.6-3.5 months) in patients with mutated ctDNA (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23-0.75; P = .004). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this single-arm phase 2 trial suggest that cetuximab plus avelumab is an active, well tolerated rechallenge therapy in RAS WT mCRC. Plasma ctDNA analysis before treatment may allow selection of patients who could benefit. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04561336

The LARS score is an internationally well-accepted questionnaire to assess low anterior resection syndrome, but currently there is no formally validated Italian version. The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Italian version among Italian patients submitted to sphincter-sparing surgery for rectal cancer. The English version of the LARS score was translated into Italian following the forward-and-back translation process. A total of 147 patients filled out our version. Among them, 40 patients answered the questionnaire twice for the test-retest reliability phase. The validity of the LARS score was tested using convergent and discriminant validity indicators by correlating the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 questionnaires. The LARS score capability to differentiate groups of patients with different demographic or clinical features was also assessed. The test-retest reliability was excellent in 87.5% of patients, remained in the same LARS category in both tests. The convergent validity phase showed a relevant relationship of the LARS score with the EORTC domains, which was significant for 7 of 15 EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales, and for 14 of 29 EORTC QLQ-CR29 subscales. The LARS score was able to discriminate patients who received radiotherapy (p = 0.0026), TME vs. PME (p = 0.0060), tumour site at < 10 cm from the anal verge (p = 0.0030) and history of protective stoma (p < 0.0001). The Italian version of the LARS score is a valid and reliable tool for measuring LARS in Italian patients after SSS for rectal cancer.

Biomarcadors; Càncer colorectal; Classificació molecular Biomarcadores; Cáncer colorrectal; Clasificación molecular Biomarkers; Colorectal cancer; Molecular classification Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous disease representing a therapeutic challenge, which is further complicated by the common occurrence of several molecular alterations that confer resistance to standard chemotherapy and targeted agents. Mechanisms of resistance have been identified at multiple levels in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway, including mutations in KRAS, NRAS, and BRAFV600E, and in the HER2 and MET receptors. These alterations represent oncogenic drivers that may co-exist in the same tumor with other primary and acquired alterations via a clonal selection process. Other molecular alterations include DNA damage repair mechanisms and rare kinase fusions, potentially offering a rationale for new therapeutic strategies. In recent years, genomic analysis has been expanded by a more complex study of epigenomic, transcriptomic, and microenvironment features. The Consensus Molecular Subtype (CMS) classification describes four CRC subtypes with distinct biological characteristics that show prognostic and potential predictive value in the clinical setting. Here, we review the panorama of actionable targets in CRC, and the developments in more recent molecular tests, such as liquid biopsy analysis, which are increasingly offering clinicians a means of ensuring optimal tailored treatments for patients with metastatic CRC according to their evolving molecular profile and treatment history

Background The emerging role of next-generation sequencing (NGS) targeted panels is revolutionising our approach to cancer patients, providing information on gene alterations helpful for diagnosis and clinical decision, in a short time and with acceptable costs. Materials and methods In this work, we evaluated the clinical application of FoundationOne CDx test, a hybrid capture-based NGS. This test identifies alterations in 324 genes, tumour mutational burden and genomic signatures as microsatellite instability. The decision to obtain the NGS assay for a particular patient was done according to investigator's choice. Results Overall, 122 tumour specimens were analysed, of which 84 (68.85%) succeeded. The success rate was influenced by type of specimen formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE block vs FFPE slides), by origin of the sample (surgery vs biopsy) and by time of fixation (

Squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is a rising health issue, strongly related to other relevant medical conditions such as (HIV) and human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Correct assessment of patients with SCCA requires a multidisciplinary evaluation and adequate follow-up. Accurate local and systemic staging, as well as risk evaluation, are essential to optimal treatment planning. Early stage tumours can be definitively treated with a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, while salvage surgery is usually reserved for patients who develop local recurrence. Distant recurrence and de novo metastatic disease are associated with poorer prognosis and require palliative systemic chemotherapy, with different single agent and combination options available. Finally, recent discoveries on the carcinogenesis of SCCA have allowed the development of innovative treatment options, the most promising being immune checkpoint inhibitors. The limited systemic treatments for SCCA and low incidence of the disease, together with insufficient data from clinical research could explain the poor outcomes of these patients, which should therefore be managed in high volume centres and enrolled in clinical trials whenever possible. This article summarises the main strategies for treating patients with SCCA.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors are valuable therapeutics in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs), such as cetuximab or panitumumab, in combination with chemotherapy are effective treatment options for patients with RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC. Nevertheless, several issues are still open concerning the optimal use of anti-EGFR drugs in the continuum of care of mCRC. Novel approaches for increasing the efficacy of anti-EGFR therapies include better molecular selection of EGFR-dependent mCRC, intensification of chemotherapy, combination of anti-EGFR MoAbs and immune checkpoint inhibitors, and reintroduction of EGFR blockade or 'rechallenge' in selected patients who have previously responded to anti-EGFR MoAb therapy. An extensive translational research program was conducted in the Cetuximab After Progression in KRAS wIld-type colorectal cancer patients-Gruppo Oncologico dell' Italia Meridionale (CAPRI-GOIM) study with the aims of determining which subgroups of patients could benefit from the continuous inhibition of EGFR, from evaluating the role of liquid biopsy-based and its concordance with tissue-based molecular testing, and from investigating novel potential mechanisms of resistance to anti-EGFR therapies. In this review, we summarize the translational and clinical findings of the CAPRI-GOIM program in the context of the current knowledge of therapeutic strategies and of ongoing research on more appropriate uses of anti-EGFR therapies in RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC patients.

Introduction: Molecular profiling has led to significantly longer survival in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Clinical guidelines recommend testing for KRAS/NRAS, BRAF and MSI status, and new biomarkers such as HER2 amplification and NTRK fusions have emerged more recently in refractory CRC, supported by overwhelming clinical relevance. These biomarkers can guide treatment management to improve clinical outcomes in these patients. Areas covered: Preclinical and clinical data over the last decade were reviewed for known and novel biomarkers with clinical implications in refractory CRC. Molecular alterations are described for classic and novel biomarkers, and data for completed and ongoing studies with targeted and immunotherapies are presented. Expert opinion: Use of targeted therapies based on biomarker testing in CRC has enabled impressive improvements in clinical outcomes in refractory patients. BRAF, MSI, NRAS and KRAS should be tested upfront in all patients given their indisputable therapeutic implications. Other molecular alterations such as HER2 and NTRK are emerging. Testing for these alterations may further improve outcomes for refractory CRC patients. Nonetheless, many key aspects remain to be defined including the optimal timing and technique for testing, the most adequate panel, and whether all patients should be tested for all alterations.

Tumor heterogeneity represents a possible cause of error in detecting predictive genetic alterations on tumor tissue and can be overcome by testing alterations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) using liquid biopsy. We assessed 72 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) using Idylla&trade, Biocartis, a fully automated platform that evaluates the most frequent mutations of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF genes. We correlated the results of liquid biopsy and standard tissue-based next generation sequencing (NGS) analyses to patient clinical features. The overall agreement was 81.94%. Concordance was 85.71% and 96.15% in treatment-na&iuml, ve patients and in the patient subgroup with liver metastases, respectively. In liver metastases positive, treatment-na&iuml, ve patients, sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) were 92.31%, 100% and 100%, respectively. Circulating mutational fraction (CMF) was significantly higher in patients with liver metastases and high carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels. In a subgroup of patients pre-treated with anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) agents, emerging KRAS mutations were evidenced in 33% of cases. Testing RAS/BRAF mutations on plasma using the Idylla&trade, Biocartis platform is feasible and reliable in mCRC patients in clinical practice.

Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Over the last two decades, median overall survival (OS) for patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) has increased to roughly 30 months due to the improvements in number and efficacy of systemic therapies. Recently, two novel drugs have been approved for the treatment of chemorefractory mCRC patients such as Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102). However, despite their clinical approval, it still remains unclear which of these two drugs should be used first because of lack of head-to-head randomized trials. Methods: We have compared retrospectively the safety and efficacy between regorafenib and Tas-102 in patients with mCRC refractory to standard therapies who had access to both drugs at a single institution between January 2018 and February 2019, in a clinical practice setting. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared using a log-rank test with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) Results: Forty-six patients with mCRC treated with regorafenib or TAS102, in a clinical practice setting, after failure of standard therapies including fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, anti-VEGF therapy and anti-EGFR agents in RAS wild type were included in the analysis. In particular, among them 25 patients were treated for the first time (primary treatment) with regorafenib whereas 21 patients were treated with TAS-102. Of these patients, 20 patients switched to crossover treatment. In particular, 12 went on to receive TAS-102 and 8 went on to receive regorafenib as secondary treatment. Baseline demographic and disease characteristics were well balanced between the two groups in terms of the primary treatment. No patient had complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). The median OS was 15 months for regorafenib and 15.2 months for TAS-102 and the corresponding values after crossover were 5.4 and 5.1 months respectively. Median PFS1 defined as the interval from the first administration of the primary treatment to the first radiological progression or death from any cause, whichever come first, was 4.2 months for regorafenib and 4 months for TAS-102. However, median PFS2 defined as the interval from the initiation of secondary treatment to secondary progression, for those who had undertaken crossover treatments after first progression was 4.7 months for regorafenib and 3.3 months for TAS-102. No unexpected adverse events (AEs) were found compared with previously reported data. Moreover, AEs were tolerable even after the crossover. Conclusion: No significant difference between regorafenib and TAS-102 sequence treatments was observed in patients with mCRC. Further analyses are ongoing to potentially identify a biomarker to distinguish the two drugs.

This study aims to investigate breastfeeding, infant feeding behaviours, and attitudes to feeding amongst women with eating disorders (ED) and healthy controls (HC). Women with active ED (C-ED; N = 25), past ED (P-ED; N = 28), and HC (N = 46) were recruited in pregnancy and followed up longitudinally. Post-natally infant feeding behaviour was investigated at 8 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year and parental modelling at 1 and 2 years. Women with P-ED and C-ED reported higher concerns about their infant being/becoming overweight compared with HC, respectively, at 8 weeks and 6 months and 6 months only post-partum. Women with P-ED showed less awareness of infant hunger and satiety cues compared with HC at 8 weeks. Despite few differences between ED and HC, both P-ED and C-ED predicted maternal attitudes and worries about child's eating. These are likely to impact on child's growth and later eating behaviours and might impact on the intergenerational transmission of ED.

3578 Background: Promising antitumor activity of so called rechallenge treatment with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) drugs in patients with RAS wild type (RAS WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been recently reported. Beside the absence of resistance mutations at plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis, no biomarkers of response to anti-EGFR rechallenge strategy have been identified. Methods: We conducted the single arm phase II CAVE mCRC trial to evaluate the combination of cetuximab as rechallenge plus avelumab treatment in 77 RAS WT mCRC patients, with complete (CR) or partial response (PR) to first line chemotherapy plus anti-EGFR drugs, who developed acquired resistance and received a subsequent line of therapy. A post-hoc baseline analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and EGFR-S492R mutations was performed for 67/77 (87%) patients. The correlation of skin toxicity (ST) and other clinical variables with OS, PFS and response rate (RR) was assessed. Results: Cetuximab plus avelumab provided in the intention to treat population (ITT) median overall survival (mOS) of 11.6 months [95% Confidence Interval (CI), 8.4-14.8] and median PFS (mPFS) of 3.6 months (95% CI, 3.2-4.1) with a manageable toxicity profile. Thirty-three (42.9%) patients experienced grade 2-3 ST with mOS of 17.8 months (CI 95% 14.9-20.7), whereas 44 (57.1%) patients with grade 0-1 ST exhibited mOS of 8.2 months (CI 95% 5.6-11), (HR 0.51, CI 95% 0.29-0.89, P = 0.019). mPFS was 4.6 months (CI 95% 3.5-5.8) in patients with grade 2-3 ST, compared to 3.4 months (CI 95% 2.8-4.1) in patients with grade 0-1 ST (HR 0.49, CI 95% 0.3-0.8, P = 0.004). Grade 2-3 ST and baseline RAS/BRAF/EGFR WT ctDNA were the only variables with statistically significant effect on OS both at univariate and multivariate analyses. ST, number of metastatic sites ≤2, surgery of primary tumor and RAS/BRAF/EGFR WT ctDNA were associated with an improvement in PFS only at univariate analysis. In the 33 patients with grade 2-3 ST, 1 (3%) CR, 2 (6.1%) PR and 24 (72.7%) stable disease (SD) were observed, with disease control rate (DCR) of 81.8%. In the 44 patients with grade 0-1 ST 0 CR, 3 (6.8%) PR, 20 (45.5%) SD, with 52.3% DCR were reported. Conclusions: Cetuximab plus avelumab is effective and well tolerated as rechallenge treatment in mCRC. ST is a clinical biomarker for the identification of RAS/BRAF mCRC patients that could benefit from anti-EGFR rechallenge. Clinical trial information: NCT04561336.

Immunotherapy has recently become a major treatment modality for several types of solid tumours, achieving remarkable and long-lasting remissions. In metastatic colorectal cancer patients (mCRC), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were found to be effective as treatment for deficient mismatch repair (dMMR)/ microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) tumours and received regulatory approval for this indication. However, mCRC is a complex disease and dMMR/MSI-H tumours represent a minority of the cases; therefore, new strategies are needed to extend the benefits of immunotherapy to a larger population of patients. This review explores the immunological differences between dMMR/MSI-H and proficient mismatch repair (pMMR)/ microsatellite instability low (MSI-L) tumours, focuses on new proposed biomarkers to predict response to immunotherapy and illustrates results reported from the main clinical trials with immunotherapeutic agents in CRC, addressing the most promising approaches being currently developed.

3541 Background: So far, no biomarkers of response to anti-angiogenic drugs are available in colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment. Liquid biopsy tracks dynamic mutational changes in CRC patients (pts). RAS mutant allele fraction in plasma (plMAF) is an independent prognostic marker in metastatic CRC (mCRC). We explored the predictive value of plMAF in RAS mutant pts treated in 1st line with chemotherapy +/- bevacizumab (bev). Methods: A multicentric prospective/retrospective analysis was conducted. We collected data from 226 mCRC pts and selected the subset not eligible for metastasis resection with basal plMAF sample evaluable for RAS mutant MAF quantification with digital PCR (BEAMing). Pts were stratified as high (≥ 5.8%) or low ( < 5.8%) plMAF. We investigated associations between clinicopathological variables and progression-free survival (PFS) stratified by plMAF RAS levels using Cox regression models and survival data were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. Computational analysis of baseline CT scan data extracted 93 radiomics features of all the lesions per patient including 1) 1st class from density histogram distribution and texture analysis by 2) 2nd order and 3) higher order feature classes. The radiomic features distribution between pts with high and low pIMAF was assessed with Student’s t-test analysis. Results: From October 17 to May 19, 63 basal plasma samples were analysed with BEAMing. 42 pts (67.7%) were classified as high and 21 pts (32,3%) as low plMAF. In high plMAF subgroup, a statistically significant longer PFS favouring FOLFOX+bev was observed, compared to FOLFOX alone (10.7 vs 6.9 mts; HR: 0.30; p = 0.002). In low RAS plMAF subgroup, no differences in terms of PFS were observed in either arm (8.9 vs 8.7 mts; HR: 0.7; p = 0.6). Multivariate PFS model showed no association between RAS plMAF and clinicopathological variables, except for high RAS plMAF and treatment benefit with FOLFOX+bev. The CT-radiomics signature, that may translate tumor vascularization, differentiated patients with high vs low pIMAF (p = 0.002). 58 patients (92%) had similar radiomic score; 5 patients with high plMAF (8%) presented very heterogeneous radiomic score distribution. Conclusions: Tumor-borne RAS plMAFs may constitute a potential predictive biomarker of efficacy for anti-angiogenic drugs in mCRC. Next steps will include the identification of -histological, transcriptomic and radiomic- surrogate biomarkers of response that reflect tumor irrigational status.

4112 Background: BRAF V600 mt mCRC is an aggressive disease with poor OS under standard chemotherapy. Treatment with doublet and triplet targeted combinations, such as BRAF inhibitor+ antiEGFR+/- MEK inhibitor, has been shown to improve outcomes. Prognostic factors in this targeted treated population remain to be studied. Methods: Prospective international cohort of patients who received doublet or triplet anti-BRAF combinations in clinical trials or as compassionate use. Univariate Cox models for OS were constructed and the strongest predictors in stepwise variable selection were used to develop a prognostic score. The final multivariate model with selected predictors was stratified by prior lines. Results: In total, 42 patients were enrolled. Median age 60.7 y (33-83), 61% female, 61% right-sided tumors, 26% received 2 or more prior chemotherapy lines. One patient (2.6%) achieved complete response and 36% had partial response with median follow-up of 14.3 months. Median progression-free survival was 5.5 months (CI95% 4.4-10.4) and median OS (mOS) was 10.7 months (CI95% 8.4-22.1). In univariate models, ECOG performance status (1 vs 0), CEA levels (high - > 3.5 ng/mL- vs low - < 3.5 ng/mL), CA 19.9 (high vs. low), LDH (high vs. low), number of metastatic sites and presence of liver metastasis were significant prognostic factors. On the other hand, MSI status and peritoneal or nodal metastasis did not associate with outcome. In multivariable model, strongest determinants of OS were ECOG and baseline CEA levels. If high-risk for both factors (ECOG 1 and CEA high, 46% of the patients), mOS was 5.6 months (CI95% 4.2-NA); if intermediate-risk (either ECOG 1 or CEA high, 33%), mOS was 13.5 months (CI95% 10.6-NA); if low-risk (ECOG 0 and CEA low, 21%), mOS not reached (CI95% 16.5-NA). Differences between intermediate- and high-risk prognostic groups compared to low-risk were significant (HR = 5.9, p = 0.03; and HR = 25.9, p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Patients characteristics such as ECOG and surrogates of tumor burden like CEA levels remain important OS determinants in BRAF V600 mt mCRC treated with doublet or triplet targeted therapy. In fact, there are not prognostic scores regarding BRAF mt mCRC treated with targeted therapies. Our study suggests that these prognostic factors may be considered as stratification factors in future clinical trials.

Metastatic colorectal cancer; RAS analysis; Prognostic biomarker Cáncer colorrectal en metástasis; Análisis RAS; Biomarcador como pronóstico Càncer colorectal en metàstasi; Anàlisi RAS; Biomarcador com a pronòstic Despite major advances in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the survival rate remains very poor. This study aims at exploring the prognostic value of RAS‐mutant allele fraction (MAF) in plasma in mCRC. Forty‐seven plasma samples from 37 RAS‐mutated patients with nonresectable metastases were tested for RAS in circulating tumor DNA using BEAMing before first‐ and/or second‐line treatment. RAS MAF was correlated with several clinical parameters (number of metastatic sites, hepatic volume, carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19‐9 levels, primary site location, and treatment line) and clinical outcome [progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)]. An independent cohort of 32 patients from the CAPRI‐GOIM trial was assessed for clinical outcome based on plasma baseline MAF. RAS MAF analysis at baseline revealed a significant correlation with longer OS [Hazard ratios (HR) = 3.514; P = 0.00066]. Patients with lower MAF also showed a tendency to longer PFS, although not statistically significant. Multivariate analysis showed RAS MAFs as an independent prognostic factor in both OS (HR = 2.73; P = 0.006) and first‐line PFS (HR = 3.74; P = 0.049). Tumor response to treatment in patients with higher MAF was progression disease (P = 0.007). Patients with low MAFs at baseline in the CAPRI‐GOIM group also showed better OS [HR = 3.84; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.5–9.6; P = 0.004] and better PFS (HR = 2.5; 95% CI: 1.07–5.62; P = 0.033). This minimally invasive test may help in adding an independent factor to better estimate outcomes before initiating treatment. Further prospective studies using MAF as a stratification factor could further validate its utility in clinical practice. This work was supported partially by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad) and `Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER), una manera de hacer Europa' grants [FIS PI12-01589 to RS] and RETICC Cancer.

The EPHA2 tyrosine kinase receptor is implicated in tumor progression and targeted therapies resistance. We evaluated EPHA2 as a potential resistance marker to the antiepidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody cetuximab in colorectal cancer. We studied activation of EPHA2 in a panel of human colorectal cancer cell lines sensitive or resistant to anti-EGFR drugs. The in vitro and in vivo effects of ALW-II-41-27 (an EPHA2 inhibitor) and/or cetuximab treatment were tested. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor specimens from 82 RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with FOLFIRI + cetuximab as first-line therapy in the CAPRI-GOIM trial were assessed for EPHA2 expression by immunohistochemistry and correlated with treatment efficacy. EPHA2 was differentially activated in colorectal cancer cell lines. Combined treatment with ALW-II-41-27 plus cetuximab reverted primary and acquired resistance to cetuximab, causing cell growth inhibition, inducing apoptosis and cell-cycle G1–G2 arrest. In tumor xenograft models, upon progression to cetuximab, ALW-II-41-27 addition significantly inhibited tumor growth. EPHA2 protein expression was detected in 55 of 82 tumor samples, frequently expressed in less-differentiated and left-sided tumors. High levels of EPHA2 significantly correlated with worse progression-free survival [8.6 months; confidence interval (CI) 95%, 6.4–10.8; vs. 12.3 months; CI 95%, 10.4–14.2; P = 0.03] and with increased progression rate (29% vs. 9%, P = 0.02). A specific EPHA2 inhibitor reverts in vitro and in vivo primary and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy. EPHA2 levels are significantly associated with worse outcome in patients treated with FOLFIRI + cetuximab. These results highlight EPHA2 as a potential therapeutic target in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Background Constitutive activation of HER2-dependent intracellular signalling by HER2 gene amplification or by HER2 mutations has been demonstrated as a mechanism of primary and secondary cancer resistance to cetuximab or panitumumab in preclinical and clinical models of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Both HER2 Amplification for Colorectal Cancer Enhanced Stratification (HERACLES) cohort A and My Pathway clinical trials provided clinical evidence that anti-HER2 therapies could be active in these patients. Patient and methods HER2 gene amplification and HER2 protein overexpression analysis were performed in tumour tissue by fluorescence in situ hybridisation and immunohistochemistry. HER2 positivity was defined according to HERACLES CRC-specific HER2 scoring criteria. DNA analysis for multiple assessment of gene mutations or amplifications was carried out with the next-generation sequencing (NGS) Ion AmpliSeq Colon and Lung Cancer Panel and by using a more extensive targeted high-multiplex PCR-based NGS panel (OncoMine Comprehensive Assay). Results We report the clinical case of a patient with HER2 gene amplified and RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC who experienced a long lasting and relevant clinical efficacy from sequential anti-HER2 therapies (trastuzumab plus lapatinib, pertuzumab plus trastuzumab, trastuzumab emtansine, trastuzumab plus capecitabine) achieving a cumulative clinical benefit of 29 months, after failure of the first three lines of standard treatments, which included all the potentially active drugs in mCRC, and which accounted for only 14 months of disease control. HER gene amplification was confirmed by NGS on two different metastatic lesions during the evolution of the disease. Conclusion The clinical case highlights the role of HER2 gene amplification as a key genetic driver of cancer development and progression in mCRC and suggests that sequential HER2 blockade could be a potential therapeutic strategy.

Background AXL and transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) signalling pathways play a key role in modulating tumour microenvironment by promoting epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), stromal activation and regulating immune response in colorectal cancer (CRC). Here we have evaluated the effect of double blockade of TGF-β and AXL receptors, as an innovative therapeutic strategy for CRC. Methods We assessed the correlation of TGF-β and AXL by an in silico analysis of a human CRC gene expression profile database. Afterwards, an evaluation of AXL expression of in a panel of human CRC cell lines by Western Blot (WB) and Real time PCR was performed. The sensitivity of HCT116 and LOVO cells to treatment with galunisertib (LY21209761), a TGF-β R1 inhibitor, and R428, an AXL inhibitor, was assessed by MTT, cell migration, and colony forming assays. Furthermore we generated patient derived 3D spheroid cultures from primary CRC, and tested their susceptibility to galunisertib and R428 by MTT assay. Finally, in vivo experiments were done with HCT116 and LOVO tumour xenografts in immunodeficient mice. Results In silico analysis showed an association between high expression levels of AXL and TGF-β R1 in CMS4 CRC. AXL was differently expressed on cell lines, and interestingly it resulted increased in HCT116 and LOVO after TGF-β inhibition, probably representing a mechanism of cancer cell escape. Dual blockade with galunisertib and R428 determined a reduction in cell migration of 50% in HCT116 and 37% in LOVO cells, respectively, and colony formation of approximately 90 % in both cell lines. Moreover, combined treatment displayed a strong synergistic activity in 3D cultures derived from five human CRC samples, resulting in the inhibition of proliferation ranging from 80 to 90%. The in vivo experiments of HCT116 and LOVO subcutaneous xenograft models are currently on going and results will be presented. Conclusions Combined TGF-β and AXL inhibition showed a promising activity in preclinical models of CRC and could represent a novel potential therapeutic strategy for patients with CRC. Legal entity responsible for the study Universita degli studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli". Funding ICURE project, Universita degli studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli". Disclosure D. Melisi: Research grant/Funding (self): Lilly.

Purpose: The use of cetuximab in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer is limited by development of resistance. Experimental Design: We have investigated in three models of highly epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)–dependent colorectal cancer xenografts, the effect of maintenance therapy with different kinase inhibitors alone or in combination with cetuximab, after cytotoxic treatment induction with irinotecan plus cetuximab. Results: SW48, LIM 1215, and GEO colorectal cancer cell lines were engrafted into nude mice and treated for 3 weeks with irinotecan and/or cetuximab. The combined treatment induced a significant reduction of tumor size. A subsequent experiment was performed in all three xenograft models in which after an induction treatment with irinotecan plus cetuximab, mice were randomly assigned to one of the following treatments: control, cetuximab, regorafenib, a selective PIK3CA inhibitor (PIK3CAi), a selective MEK inhibitor (MEKi), and/or the combination of each inhibitor with cetuximab. The cetuximab plus MEKi treatment determined the best antitumor activity with suppression of tumor growth. This effect was prolonged for 13 to 15 weeks after cessation of therapy and was accompanied by prolonged survival. Antitumor activity was accompanied by inhibition of the MAPK and MEK pathways. Moreover, in the cetuximab plus MEKi-treated SW48 xenograft group, KRAS mutations as a mechanism of acquired resistance were detected in 25% of cases compared with 75% KRAS mutations in the MEKi-treated group. Conclusions: A possible strategy to prevent and/or overcome resistance to anti-EGFR inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer is a maintenance therapy with cetuximab plus MEKi after an initial treatment with irinotecan plus cetuximab. Clin Cancer Res; 21(18); 4153–64. ©2015 AACR.

Recent developments in genomic technologies have led an unprecedented view of the profound molecular complexity of colorectal cancer (CRC) and its evolution. The genomic landscape of CRC is characterized by a high heterogeneous landscape both at an intratumoral and at an inter-metastatic and intrametastatic level. In the era of personalized cancer medicine, the challenge is the definition of predictive biomarkers in respect of a such complex scenario. Despite the robust differences occurring between primary tumor and metastatic sites, the biomarkers currently validated in clinical practice have high concordance. The purpose of this review is to explore differences existing in genetic landscape of primary tumor and metastatic sites in CRC, in order to assess concordance and discordance rates of biologic events between different tumor lesions in CRC.

Objective The present study provides a comprehensive review of the existing literature on the safety of serotonin–noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) in pregnancy and lactation. Methods Studies published in English, reporting the use of SNRIs in pregnant and/or breastfeeding women, were identified by searching MEDLINE/Pubmed, PsycINFO, and EMBASE. Results Twenty-nine studies were included in the review. Altogether, the initial evidence coming from the reviewed studies suggests a lack of association between SNRIs and an increased risk of major congenital malformations. Conversely, exposure to SNRIs seems to be significantly associated with an increased risk of some perinatal complications. No neonatal adverse events emerged, so far, in the few studies concerning the safety of SNRIs during breastfeeding. Conclusions Available data suggest that venlafaxine is relatively safe during pregnancy, in particular as far as major malformations are concerned, whereas considering the small number of studies published, no definitive conclusions can be drawn on its safety during breastfeeding. Because of the few studies so far published, the safety of duloxetine during pregnancy and breastfeeding remains to be well established. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

// Stefania Napolitano 1 , Giulia Martini 1 , Erika Martinelli 1 , Carminia Maria Della Corte 1 , Floriana Morgillo 1 , Valentina Belli 1 , Claudia Cardone 1 , Nunzia Matrone 1 , Fortunato Ciardiello 1 and Teresa Troiani 1 1 Oncologia Medica, Dipartimento di Internistica Clinica e Sperimentale “F. Magrassi”, Universita degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy Correspondence to: Teresa Troiani, email: teresa.troiani@unicampania.it Keywords: MM151, cetuximab, acquired resistance, epidermal growth factor receptor, metastatic colorectal cancer Received: April 13, 2017 Accepted: June 17, 2017 Published: August 02, 2017 ABSTRACT Purpose: We investigated the effect of triple monoclonal antibody inhibition of EGFR to overcome acquired resistance to first generation of anti-EGFR inhibitors. Experimental design: MM151 is a mixture of three different monoclonal IgG1 antibodies directed toward three different, non-overlapping, epitopes of the EGFR. We performed an in vivo study by using human CRC cell lines (SW48, LIM 1215 and CACO2) which are sensitive to EGFR inhibitors, in order to evaluate the activity of MM151 as compared to standard anti-EGFR mAbs, such as cetuximab, as single agent or in a sequential strategy of combination MM151 with irinotecan (induction therapy) followed by MM151 with a selective MEK1/2 inhibitor (MEKi) (maintenance therapy). Furthermore, the ability of MM151 to overcome acquired resistance to cetuximab has been also evaluated in cetuximab-refractory CRC models. Results: MM151 shown stronger antitumor activity as compared to cetuximab. The maintenance treatment with MM151 plus MEKi resulted the most effective therapeutic modality. In fact, this combination caused an almost complete suppression of tumor growth in SW48, LIM 1215 and CACO2 xenografts model at 30 week. Moreover, in this treatment group, mice with no evidence of tumor were more than double as compared to single agent treated mice. Its superior activity has also been demonstrated, in cetuximab-refractory CRC models. Conclusions: These results provide experimental evidence that more efficient and complete EGFR blockade may determine better antitumor activity and could contribute to prevent and/or overcome acquired resistance to EGFR inhibitors.

The prognosis for patients who are diagnosed with advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is poor because there are few treatment options. Recent research has focused on the identification of novel molecular entities that can be targeted to inhibit oncogenic signals that are involved in the carcinogenesis, proliferation and progression of HCC. Among all of the pathways that are involved in the development of HCC, Hedgehog (HH) signalling has demonstrated a substantial role in hepatocarcinogenesis and HCC progression. HH plays a physiological role in embryogenesis, through the induction of the differentiation of hepatocytes from endodermal progenitors. The re-activation of the HH pathway in chronic damaged liver is a mechanism of fibrotic degeneration and is implicated in various stages of HCC development. HH activation sustains the sub-population of immature liver epithelial cells that are involved in the pathogenesis of cirrhosis and HCC, and HH itself is a mediator of the alcohol-derived malignant transformation of liver cells. High levels of expression of HH protein markers in liver tumour tissues are correlated with aggressive histological and biological features and a poor clinical outcome. In vitro and in vivo inhibition models of the HH pathway confirm that HH is essential in maintaining tumour growth, metastasis and a mesenchymal phenotype.

In the last two decades, great efforts have been made in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) due to the approval of new target agents for cytotoxic drugs. Unfortunately, a large percentage of patients present with metastasis at the time of diagnosis or relapse after a few months. The complex molecular heterogeneity of this disease is not completely understood; to date, there is a lack of predictive biomarkers that can be used to select subsets of patients who may respond to target drugs. Only the RAS -mutation status is used to predict resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents in patients with mCRC. In this review, we describe approved targeted therapies for the management of metastatic mCRC and discuss new candidate targets on the horizon.

// Stefania Napolitano 1 , Giulia Martini 1 , Erika Martinelli 1 , Valentina Belli 1 , Alessia Parascandolo 2 , Mikko O. Laukkanen 2 , Vincenzo Sforza 1 , Floriana Morgillo 1 , Davide Ciardiello 1 , Fortunato Ciardiello 1 and Teresa Troiani 1 1 Oncologia Medica, Dipartimento Medico-Chirurgico di Internistica Clinica e Sperimentale “F. Magrassi e A. Lanzara”, Universita degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy 2 IRCCS SDN, Via Gianturco, 80143 Naples, Italy Correspondence to: Teresa Troiani, email: tessy75@inwind.it Fortunato Ciardiello, email: fortunato.ciardiello@unina2.it Keywords: SYM004, cetuximab, acquired resistance, MET, metastatic colorectal cancer Received: December 05, 2016 Accepted: February 14, 2017 Published: June 27, 2017 ABSTRACT Purpose: Cetuximab and panitumumab have an effective therapeutic response in a subset of RAS Wild-Type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs). Despite molecular-driven selection, all patients do not respond to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors and the onset of secondary resistance limits their clinical benefit. Experimental Design: We tested, in vitro and in vivo , the effect of SYM004, a 1:1 mixture of two recombinant human-mouse chimeric monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed against non-overlapping epitopes of the EGFR, on CRC models with acquired resistance to cetuximab. Results: SYM004 showed a potent growth inhibitory effect in CRC cell lines with acquired resistance to cetuximab and MET activation. SYM004 treatment determined a significant induction of apoptosis and a strong inhibition of MET, AKT and MAPK phosphorilation in these resistant models. The data may further suggest SYM004 -driven induced internalization and degradation of the antibody-receptor complex, which prevents cross-interaction between EGFR and MET even in the presence of TGFα. Moreover, in vivo xenograft studies demonstrated that SYM004 has stronger antitumor activity than cetuximab in CRC models. Importantly, in the current work we observed a response to therapy in all cetuximab resistant tumors mice treated with SYM004. More importantly, four out of seven mice continue to respond to SYM004 after 30 weeks of treatment underling the prolonged effect of the drug. Conclusion: These results suggest that the treatment with SYM004 could be a strategy to overcome acquired resistance to first generation of anti-EGFR therapies in mCRC as a result of MET activation.

Background TAS-102 improves overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory to standard treatments. However, predictive biomarkers of efficacy are currently lacking. Patients and methods We treated a cohort of 43 chemorefractory mCRC patients treated with TAS-102, in a single institution expanded access, compassionate use programme. We stratified patients in two groups according to number of cycles received (

Please click here to see linked paper Background To investigate the potential predictors of response to regorafenib, in chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with long-term efficacy from regorafenib treatment. Methods Retrospective, single institution analysis of patients with chemorefractory mCRC treated with regorafenib, in clinical practice setting. 123 patients were treated and stratified into two groups according to number of cycles received ( Results A good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, a lung limited metastatic disease and a long history of metastatic disease were significantly associated with better OS and PFS from treatment with regorafenib. Mutations were mostly found in TP53 , KRAS and PIK3CA as well as in NRAS , ERBB2, SMAD4 and PTEN genes. BCL2L1, ERBB2, KRAS, MYC, GAS6 gene amplifications were detected as well as ALK rearrangement. No significant correlation between molecular alterations and response to regorafenib was observed. However, HER2 gene alterations were found in three poor responder patients, suggesting a potential role in regorafenib resistance. Conversely, GAS6 amplification and SMAD4 mutation, detected in two long responder patients, might suggest a role of epithelial–mesenchymal transition phenotype in regorafenib response. Conclusion A subgroup of long responder patients to regorafenib treatment was identified and a comprehensive molecular characterisation was performed; however, further research efforts are essential to confirm our data.

SUMMARY The prognosis of patients harboring metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) remains poor despite therapeutic improvements obtained in recent years thanks to new biologic agents. A resistance mechanism limits the effectiveness of current cancer therapies to treat metastatic CRC patients. The identification of mechanisms of drug resistance may highlight new biomarkers useful to predict the clinical outcome or the likely responsiveness to pharmacological treatment of those metastatic CRC patients who cannot benefit from current therapeutic regimen. Moreover, the recognition of panels of biomarkers may suggest new strategies to overcome resistance by rational drug design and combination treatment. This review discusses CRC biomarkers, focusing initially on the most recent findings about the known ones, and mostly about the novel protagonists of this complex scenario.