Search

Summary Background BIG 3-07/TROG 07.01 is an international, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial evaluating tumour bed boost and hypofractionation in patients with non-low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ following breast-conserving surgery and whole breast radiotherapy. Here, we report the effects of diagnosis and treatment on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) at 2 years. Methods The BIG 3-07/TROG 07.01 trial is ongoing at 118 hospitals in 11 countries. Women aged 18 years or older with completely excised non-low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ were randomly assigned, by use of a minimisation algorithm, to tumour bed boost or no tumour bed boost, following conventional whole breast radiotherapy or hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy using one of three randomisation categories. Category A was a 4-arm randomisation of tumour bed boost versus no boost following conventional whole breast radiotherapy (50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks) versus hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy (42·5 Gy in 16 fractions over 3·5 weeks). Category B was a 2-arm randomisation between tumour bed boost versus no boost following conventional whole breast radiotherapy, and category C was a 2-arm randomisation between tumour bed boost versus no boost following hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy. Stratification factors were age at diagnosis, planned endocrine therapy, and treating centre. The primary endpoint, time to local recurrence, will be reported when participants have completed 5 years of follow-up. The HRQOL statistical analysis plan prespecified eight aspects of HRQOL, assessed by four questionnaires at baseline, end of treatment, and at 6, 12, and 24 months after radiotherapy: fatigue and physical functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30); cosmetic status, breast-specific symptoms, arm and shoulder functional status (Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale); body image and sexuality (Body Image Scale); and perceived risk of invasive breast cancer (Cancer Worry Scale and a study-specific question). For each of these measures, tumour bed boost was compared with no boost, and conventional whole breast radiotherapy compared with hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy, by use of generalised estimating equation models. Analyses were by intention to treat, with Hochberg adjustment for multiple testing. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT00470236 . Findings Between June 1, 2007, and Aug 14, 2013, 1208 women were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive no tumour bed boost (n=605) or tumour bed boost (n=603). 396 of 1208 women were assigned to category A: conventional whole breast radiotherapy with tumour bed boost (n=100) or no boost (n=98), or to hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy with tumour bed boost (n=98) or no boost (n=100). 447 were assigned to category B: conventional whole breast radiotherapy with tumour bed boost (n=223) or no boost (n=224). 365 were assigned to category C: hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy with tumour bed boost (n=182) or no boost (n=183). All patients were followed up at 2 years for the HRQOL analysis. 1098 (91%) of 1208 patients received their allocated treatment, and most completed their scheduled HRQOL assessments (1147 [95%] of 1208 at baseline; 988 [87%] of 1141 at 2 years). Cosmetic status was worse with tumour bed boost than with no boost across all timepoints (difference 0·10 [95% CI 0·05–0·15], global p=0·00014, Hochberg-adjusted p=0·0016); at the end of treatment, the estimated difference between tumour bed boost and no boost was 0·13 (95% CI 0·06–0·20; p=0·00021), persisting at 24 months (0·13 [0·06–0·20]; p=0·00021). Arm and shoulder function was also adversely affected by tumour bed boost across all timepoints (0·08 [95% CI 0·03–0·13], global p=0·0033, Hochberg adjusted p=0·045); the difference between tumour bed boost and no boost at the end of treatment was 0·08 (0·01 to 0·15, p=0·021), and did not persist at 24 months (0·04 [–0·03 to 0·11], p=0·29). None of the other six prespecified aspects of HRQOL differed significantly after adjustment for multiple testing. Conventional whole breast radiotherapy was associated with worse body image than hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy at the end of treatment (difference –1·10 [95% CI –1·79 to –0·42], p=0·0016). No significant differences were reported in the other PROs between conventional whole breast radiotherapy compared with hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy. Interpretation Tumour bed boost was associated with persistent adverse effects on cosmetic status and arm and shoulder functional status, which might inform shared decision making while local recurrence analysis is pending. Funding National Health and Medical Research Council, Susan G Komen for the Cure, Breast Cancer Now, OncoSuisse, Dutch Cancer Society.

Purpose To evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of a single-fraction 8-Gy stereotactic boost after whole-breast irradiation in early breast cancer. The primary aim of this phase 2 study was to evaluate cutaneous breast toxicity using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4) 3 months after the boost. Secondary objectives were local control, survival, and patient-reported quality of life using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and breast-specific European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-BR 23 questionnaires. Methods and Materials Patients with invasive ductal or lobular pT1-2 breast cancer treated with lumpectomy with clear margins and pN0 were included. Patients requiring chemotherapy were excluded. Results Twenty-eight eligible patients received the planned boost, and 26 had hormonal therapy. The procedure was technically successful without procedural complications. A median of 3 fiducials were tracked, and 115 beams were used. There were 22 acute grade 1 breast skin toxicities, including fibrosis, pain, erythema, or pigmentation. There were 2 acute grade 2 erythemas. Median skin boost dose was inversely correlated with acute skin toxicity (P = .028). QLQ-C30 scores revealed acute dyspnea and arm symptoms without correlation to the boost dose. Breast symptom QLQ-BR23 scores did not deteriorate, although upset with hair loss and systemic side effects of hormonal therapy were observed. After a median follow-up of 38 months, 1 patient had in-boost-field relapse, and there were 5 late grade 1 and 1 grade 2 skin toxicities. Conclusions Single-fraction stereotactic boost after conventional whole-breast irradiation in early breast cancer is feasible with minor toxicities. Quality of life and specific breast items showed excellent patient acceptance.

Resume Introduction Le cas expose est un cas unique du fait de l’apparition de nodules de permeation dans le champ d’irradiation d’un cancer du sein 2 ans apres traitement chirurgical d’un melanome. Il permet egalement d’apprecier cliniquement l’efficacite du vemurafenib. Cas clinique Nous exposons le cas d’une patiente de 47 ans qui a presente un melanome type SSM, Breslow 1,02 mm, sans ulceration et d’activite mitotique faible, sous-scapulaire droit, traite par exerese chirurgicale avec des marges a 2 cm. Un mois apres, un carcinome canalaire infiltrant du sein gauche etait diagnostique. Le traitement a consiste en une tumorectomie, exerese de ganglion sentinelle et radiotherapie de 50 grays avec un boost de 15 grays. Moins de 3 mois apres la fin de la radiotherapie, la patiente a developpe de multiples metastases cutanees sur le champ d’irradiation au niveau du sein gauche. Du fait de la presence de la mutation BRAFV600E et de l’echec du traitement par dacarbazine (decitene), un traitement par vemurafenib a ete debute. Nous avons constate une regression notable de la taille des nodules de permeation sans aucune nouvelle lesion. De ce fait, une chirurgie carcinologique en marges saines avec reconstruction par lambeau pedicule de muscle grand dorsal gauche a ete l’attitude therapeutique retenue par la RCP. Les resultats anatomopathologiques ont montre une exerese complete des lesions metastatiques. Nous avons realise une symetrisation du sein controlateral afin d’ameliorer la qualite de vie de la patiente. Apres un suivi de 2 ans et demi, la patiente ne presente aucun signe de recidive local, regional ou a distance. Discussion La rapidite du developpement et la localisation des metastases cutanees dans le cas clinique presente ici nous ont amenes a reflechir sur les effets de la radiotherapie au niveau cutane. La radiotherapie entraine des complications aigues (radiodermite) et chroniques par des mecanismes cellulaires et moleculaires. De plus, un effondrement de l’immunite est retrouve apres irradiation. L’association de ces differents mecanismes pourrait expliquer l’apparition de ces metastases sur le territoire d’irradiation. L’efficacite du vemurafenib retrouve dans notre cas clinique est en accord avec ce qui est decrit dans la litterature avec des reponses souvent rapides et une augmentation de la mediane de survie. Conclusion Ce cas unique dans la litterature montre les effets de la radiotherapie sur les tissus cutanes et l’efficacite du vemurafenib. Il souligne surtout qu’une etroite collaboration entre les differents praticiens ainsi qu’une connaissance des nouvelles therapies contribuent a une meilleure prise en charge des melanomes.

Les traitements utilisant des rayons X de basse energie continuent a etre realises mais en faible nombre. Le praticien se trouve en general pres du patient pour maintenir l’appareil et expose donc ses yeux. Avec la modification envisagee de la limite maximale d’exposition du cristallin, des mesures ont ete jugees necessaires pour mieux en connaitre l’exposition. Pour cela une simulation des traitements a ete realisee. Pour la dose d’un traitement superficiel de 42 Gy, l’exposition du cristallin derriere des verres radio attenuateurs se situe entre 130 et 43 μ Sv pour des distances entre 40 et 60 cm. Pour l’intra cavitaire les valeurs obtenues sont vingt fois plus faibles. L’attenuation par les verres est superieure a 90 %. Le port des lunettes avec verres radio attenuateurs permet de minimiser la dose au cristallin de facon significative. L’application de la nouvelle limite maximale n’aura pas d’impact sur le nombre de traitements.

Purpose Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) allows stereotactic irradiation of thoracic tumors. It may have a real impact on patients who may not otherwise qualify for breast-conserving surgery. We conducted a phase 1 trial that tested 5 dose levels of SBRT concomitant with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) before to surgery. The purpose of the current dose escalation study was to determine the maximum tolerable dose of SBRT in the treatment of breast cancer. Methods and Materials To define toxicity, we performed dermatologic examinations that included clinical examinations by 2 separate physicians and technical evaluations using colorimetry, dermoscopy, and skin ultrasonography. Dermatologic examinations were performed before NACT, 36 and 56 days after the beginning of NACT, and before surgery. Surgery was performed 4 to 8 weeks after the last chemotherapy session. Efficacy, the primary endpoint, was determined by the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Results Maximum tolerable dose was not reached. Only 1 case of dose-limiting toxicity was reported (grade 3 dermatologic toxicity), and SBRT was overall well tolerated. The pCR rate was 36%, with none being observed at the first 2 dose levels, and the highest rate being obtained at dose level 3 (25.5 Gy delivered in 3 fractions). Furthermore, the breast-conserving surgery rate was up to 92% compared with an 8% total mastectomy rate. No surgical complications were reported. Conclusions This study demonstrates that SBRT can be safely combined with NACT. Regarding the efficacy endpoints, this trial showed promising results in terms of pCR rate (36%) and breast-conserving rate (92%). The findings provide a strong rationale for extending the study into a phase 2 trial. In view of the absence of correlation between dose and pCR, and given that the data from dose level 3 met the statistical requirements, a dose of 25.5 Gy in 3 fractions should be used for the phase 2 trial.

Resume Objectif de l’etude Actuellement, la mastectomie represente le traitement de reference de la recidive locale du cancer du sein. Cependant, nous avons montre qu’un second traitement conservateur etait faisable en associant une nouvelle tumorectomie et une curietherapie interstitielle de bas debit de dose. Dans la presente etude, nous rapportons les resultats preliminaires d’un second traitement conservateur avec une curietherapie de haut debit de dose. Patientes et methodes De juin 2005 a juillet 2009, 42 patientes atteintes d’une recidive locale homolaterale d’un cancer du sein ont beneficie d’un second traitement conservateur. Apres tumorectomie et mise en place peroperatoire des tubes plastiques vecteurs, une scanographie dosimetrique a ete realisee pour delivrer une dose totale de 34 Gy en dix fractions et cinq jours dans le cadre d’un traitement ambulatoire. Le traitement systemique a ete discute au cas par cas. L’evaluation de la toxicite a utilise la Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0. Resultats Le suivi median etait de 21 mois (6–50 mois), l’âge median lors de la recidive etait de 65 ans (30–85 ans). Le delai median entre la tumeur primaire du sein et la recidive etait de 11 ans (1–35 ans). La recidive locale siegeait dans le lit tumoral dans 52 % des cas (22 patientes), dans le meme quadrant dans 33 % (14 patientes) et etait de siege inconnu dans 14 % (six patientes). La taille mediane de la recidive etait de 12 mm (2–30 mm). Les nombres medians de tubes plastiques vecteurs et de plans etaient respectivement de neuf (5–12) et deux (1–3). Le volume cible anatomoclinique (CTV) median etait de 68 cm3 (31,2–146 cm3). Le taux de second controle local etait de 97 %. Des effets secondaires ont ete notes chez 22 patientes (60 %). La fibrose cutanee et sous-cutanee representait 72 % de tous les effets secondaires observes. Conclusion Un second traitement conservateur radiochirurgical utilisant une curietherapie de haut debit de dose en cas de recidive locale homolaterale semble faisable, avec des taux de second controle local encourageants au prix d’une toxicite acceptable. Considerant qu’un essai randomise de non-inferiorite entre mastectomie et un second traitement conservateur serait difficilement realisable, quel niveau de preuve sera-t-il necessaire d’obtenir pour envisager un changement des pratiques ?

Background: Despite current treatment options, metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains essentially incurable, requiring research on new drugs or combinations to improve survival and quality of life. Patients and Methods: This phase I study was designed to define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and recommended dose of all-oral tegafur-uracil (UFT)/folinic acid combined with vinorelbine as chemotherapy for MBC. Starting doses were 40 mg/m2/week of oral vinorelbine administered continuously and 250 mg/m2/day of UFT plus 90 mg/day of folinic acid from day 1 to day 28, followed by a 1-week rest period. Results: Ten patients were included. Eight were evaluable for toxicity and antitumor response. The second dose level was shown to be the MTD. At this dose, 2 out of 5 patients receiving oral vinorelbine at 40 mg/m2/week and UFT at 300 mg/m2/day developed DLT consisting of grade 3 asthenia and grade 3nausea despite standard prophylaxis. Other toxicities were grade 1 diarrhea and anemia. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: The recommended dose for this combination seems to be the first dose level. A stable response was observed for 6 patients (average 33 weeks). This combination appears to be well-tolerated and offers an alternative to intravenous chemotherapy.

Since the prolongation of survival for patients treated by radiotherapy second primary cancers are not rare. Cumulative incidence of second primary malignancy after radiotherapy (SPMAR) 40 years after treatment can reach 20 % when patients were 40 years old at treatment time. Among SPMAR some of them can be promoted by irradiation. Relative risk (RR) analysis is the most common method used to estimate the proportion of such second cancers. Most of studies reported a RR around 1.1 in adult patients. In young patients RR is about 6, meaning that SPMAR attributable to irradiation is more elevated in this subgroup. Quantification of these events, biomolecular mechanisms, risk factors are complex and not yet fully understood. Information given to patients must be adapted and the cost/benefit ratio has to be justified regarding SPMAR risk. Irradiation technique optimisation is an important point especially in young patient and adults, in order to reduce at maximum the volume of organ at risk exposed while not compromising optimal dose given to the tumour volume, although no standard rules of irradiation are definitively established at the present time.

Acute skin toxicity is frequent during radiation therapy and can lead to temporary arrest of the treatment. Chronic toxicity can occur and conduct to cosmetic problems. Alopecia is the most frequent toxicity concerning hair and is most of the time reversible. Several factors linked to patients influence skin toxicity, such as undernutrition, old age, obesity, smoking, skin diseases, autoimmune diseases, failure of DNA reparation. Skin, hair and nail toxicities depend also on radiation schedule. Acute toxicity is greater when dose per fraction increases. Chronic and acute toxicities are more often when total dose increases. Under 45 Gy, the risk of severe skin toxicity is low, and begins above 50 Gy. Skin toxicity depends also on the duration of radiotherapy and split course schedules are associated with less toxicities. Irradiation surface seems to influence skin toxicity but interaction is more complex. Reirradiation is often feasible in case of cancer recurrence but with a risk of grade 3-4 toxicity above all in head and neck cancer. The benefit/risk ratio has to be always precisely evaluated. Permanent alopecia is correlated with the follicle dose. Modern techniques of radiation therapy allow to spare skin.

Resume Objectif de l’etude La radiotherapie par CyberKnife® est devenue un traitement cle dans la prise en charge multidisciplinaire des metastases, des tumeurs malignes primitives ou benignes localisees dans ou au contact des corps vertebraux et du cordon medullaire. Les objectifs sont pour les tumeurs spinales d’ameliorer la reponse clinique et le controle tumoral, y compris dans des cas de reirradiation. Patients et methodes Nous presentons les resultats obtenus chez les premiers patients traites par CyberKnife® entre le 1er decembre 2006 et le 31 decembre 2007 pour des tumeurs spinales ou paraspinales. Nos objectifs primaires etaient d’evaluer la faisabilite et la tolerance d’une irradiation stereotaxique utilisant le CyberKnife®. Nos objectifs secondaires etaient les taux de controle local precoces, de survie sans progression locale et de survie globale. L’evaluation a eu lieu tout les trois mois par un examen clinique et par une imagerie. Elle s’est faite selon les criteres RECIST. Resultats De decembre 2006 a decembre 2007, 16 patients ont ete traites avec le CyberKnife®. Treize patients avaient ete pretraites, dont trois irradies dans la moelle a des doses considerees comme maximales. Trois patients n’avaient jamais ete traites. L’âge median le jour du traitement etait de 58,6 ans (36–74). Les symptomes les plus frequents etaient la douleur (n = 8) et un deficit moteur (n = 4). La dose mediane delivree etait de 30 Gy (16–50). Le nombre de fractions median etait de trois (1–5). Des reactions aigues ont ete observees chez trois patients, mais aucun n’a ete atteint de myelite aigue. Le taux de survie globale a 18 mois etait 72 % et la duree moyenne de survie de 18,2 mois [intervalle de confiance a 95 % (IC 95 %) : 15,4–20,9]. Le taux de survie sans progression locale a 18 mois etait de 58 % et la duree moyenne de survie de 16,9 mois (IC 95 % : 13,6–20,2). Conclusion L’utilisation du CyberKnife® represente une avancee therapeutique majeure dans la prise en charge des tumeurs paramedullaires. La possibilite d’epargner au mieux le cordon medullaire et d’augmenter la dose dans le volume cible tumoral en sont les principaux avantages.

Resume Objectif de l’etude Le CyberKnife® permet de realiser une radiotherapie stereotaxique des tumeurs du thorax grâce a une precision et un systeme de suivi de la cible en temps reel dont le potentiel est etabli pour le cancer du poumon classe T1-T2 N0. Cette technique n’a jamais ete utilisee pour traiter des tumeurs du sein, mais presente un interet potentiel dans cette localisation. Patientes et methode Dans le but de definir l’interet du traitement des tumeurs du sein par CyberKnife®, nous avons construit une etude de phase I d’escalade de dose qui additionne un traitement neodjuvant associant CyberKnife® et chimiotherapie, afin de permettre un traitement conservateur pour certaines tumeurs du sein dont la chirurgie conservatrice ne peut etre envisagee d’emblee. La chimiotherapie neoadjuvante comporte six cycles composes de trois cycles de docetaxel et trois 5-fluoro-uracile-epirubicine-cyclophosphamide (FEC). Le CyberKnife® est realise au cours du second cycle de chimiotherapie. La chirurgie du sein est realisee six a huit semaines apres le sixieme cycle de chimiotherapie. L’objectif principal est de definir la dose maximum toleree de la radiotherapie hypofractionnee concomitante a la chimiotherapie neoadjuvante pour les cancers du sein. La toxicite cutanee est le critere limitant l’etude. Les objectifs secondaires sont les resultats anatomopathologiques et la qualite de la chirurgie. Nous presentons les resultats preliminaires des trois premieres patientes. Cette etude participe au programme hospitalier de recherche clinique (PHRC). Resultats Aucune toxicite de grade I ou plus n’a ete retrouvee. La chirurgie a pu etre realisee avec la qualite habituelle et sans complication particuliere. L’anatomopathologiste a retrouve une reponse complete, une lymphangite carcinomateuse et une reponse partielle. Conclusion Ces resultats preliminaires sont encourageants mais doivent etre confirmes. Nous poursuivons l’etude d’escalade de dose.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the tolerance of topical application of the combination sucralfate / copper zinc salts in radiation dermatitis in women suffering from breast cancer and treated by radiotherapy. 47 patients (average age : 57,5 years) that have to be treated by radiation therapy on non lesional areas, were included into this open multicentric study. They had to apply Cicalfate cream twice a day, from the fi rst radiation therapy session and during 10 weeks. Patients were treated by photon- or electrontherapy (72 % et 28 %, respectively; cumulated total dose : 58,6Gy). Tolerance was considered to be excellent. The radiation dermatitis (score NCIC > or = 2) was noted at the 3rd week of radiotherapy only in 5 % of the subjects and in 53 % of the subjects, the last week of treatment. Pruritus was significantly increased at D21. Pain and discomfort were increased at D28, but remained low intensity. The soothing effect of the combination of sucralfate/ copper zinc salts were considered satisfying or very satisfying by investigators and patients during the study, varying from 94 to 100 % of satisfaction. The impact of radiation therapy on the patients'quality of life, assessed by DLQI, evaluated at the end of the study was not statistically different from the score calculated at D7 (DLQI=0,8 et D7 versus DLQI=1 at D70). Thus, topical application of the combination sucralfate / copper zinc salts can be used in the indication radiation dermatitis.

Purpose To evaluate early and late reactions, local control, disease-free survival, cause-specific survival, and overall survival of elderly breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant once-weekly hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT). Methods and materials Between 1987 and 1999, 150 patients (median age, 78 years) who presented with 151 nonmetastatic breast tumors were treated with surgery and then adjuvant hypofractionated RT. The clinical stage distribution was as follows: T1 in 47.7%, T2 in 43.2%, T3 in 6.1%, and T4 in 3.0%. Axillary lymph nodes were positive in 33.8% of cases. Estrogen receptors were present in 89.9%, and progesterone receptors in 77.3%. Conservative breast surgery was performed in 71.5% and total mastectomy in 28.5%. RT was delivered once weekly in five fractions of 6.5 Gy to a total dose of 32.5 Gy. A boost was delivered to the tumor bed in 33.1%. Adjuvant hormonal therapy was given in 76.2% of patients. The median follow-up was 65 months. Results The Kaplan-Meier rate of all grades of early skin reactions was 26.5%, and the rate of all late reactions was 45.5%, mainly Grades 1 and 2. Early and late reactions were greater in those who underwent boost RT. The long-term local recurrence rate was 2.3%. The 5-year and 10-year disease-free survival rate was 80% and 71.5%, respectively. The corresponding rates for cause-specific survival were 89.1% and 77.6%. The 5-year and 10-year overall survival rate was 71.6% and 46.5%, respectively. These endpoints were influenced by tumor size, lymph node status, and hormone receptor status to varying degrees; however, tumor size appeared to be a major determinant on multivariate analysis. Conclusions This hypofractionated RT scheme resulted in mild early reactions and acceptable late toxicity, in addition to providing excellent long-term local control. It can be proposed to patients who would have difficulties sustaining daily treatment because of old age or disabling associated disease.

Anaemia is frequently diagnosed in patients with cancer, yet it is difficult to identify a single cause due to its multifactorial aetiology. We conducted a systematic literature review (1996-2003) to produce evidence-based guidelines on the use of erythropoietic proteins in anaemic patients with cancer (see ). Level I evidence exists for a positive impact of erythropoietic proteins on haemoglobin (Hb) levels when administered to patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia or anaemia of chronic disease, when used to prevent cancer anaemia, in patients undergoing cancer surgery and following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. The Hb level at which erythropoietic protein therapy should be initiated is difficult to determine as it varied between studies; a large number of Level I studies in patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia or anaemia of chronic disease enrolled patients with a Hb concentration/=105 g/L, but none compared the effect of different baseline Hb levels on the response to treatment. Similarly, several studies defined the target Hb concentration as 120-130 g/L following treatment with erythropoietic proteins, but none specifically addressed the correlation between target Hb level and clinical benefit in a randomised fashion. Level I evidence shows that red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirements are significantly reduced with erythropoietic protein therapy in patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia or when used to prevent cancer anaemia (approximately 20% reduction compared with controls). We found indirect Level I and III evidence that patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia or anaemia of chronic disease initially classified as non-responders to standard doses proceed to respond to treatment following a dose increase (absolute increases in response rate ranged from 8% to 18%). However, none of these studies examined the effect on response rates of a longer treatment period at the lower dose, or performed a randomised comparison of a dose increase versus an unchanged dose. There is Level I evidence to show that quality-of-life (QOL) is significantly improved in patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia and in those with anaemia of chronic disease, particularly in patients achieving a Hb response to erythropoietic protein therapy. There are insufficient data to determine the effect on survival following treatment with erythropoietic proteins in conjunction with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. There is Level I evidence that dosing of erythropoietic proteins less frequently than three times per week (TIW) is efficacious when used to treat chemotherapy-induced anaemia or prevent cancer anaemia. There is Level III evidence that initial doses of erythropoietic proteins considered to be higher than current standard practice produce higher haematological responses in patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia or anaemia of chronic disease. Level I evidence demonstrates that several baseline patient parameters (e.g., low endogenous erythropoietin [EPO] concentration, age60 years, Hb concentration/=90 g/L) impact upon the response to erythropoietic proteins when used to treat chemotherapy-induced anaemia or prevent cancer anaemia. Evidence indicates that endogenous EPO concentration impacts on response in patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies, but is not a valid parameter in patients with solid tumours. There is Level I evidence that fixed doses of erythropoietic proteins can be used at the start of therapy to treat patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia, but maintenance doses should be titrated individually. There is no evidence that pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) occurs following treatment with erythropoietic proteins in patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia or when used prophylactically in patients with cancer. There is Level I evidence that the risk of thromboembolic events and hypertension are slightly elevated in patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia receiving erythropoietic proteins. Level I evidence supports the effectiveness of erythropoietic proteins to prevenroteins to prevent anaemia in non-anaemic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy or in those undergoing cancer surgery. However, these are non-licensed indications and we do not currently recommend the prophylactic use of erythropoietic proteins to prevent anaemia in patients who have normal Hb values at the start of treatment. Additional trials are warranted, especially on the issues of iron replacement and cost-effectiveness of erythropoietic protein therapy, as well as on tumour response/progression and survival.

Background. Approximately half of all breast cancer occurs after age 65. Several aspects for the treatment of early breast cancer may be influenced by patient age, including postoperative radiation therapy (RT), in order to prevent the risk of local recurrence (LR). Postoperative adjuvant RT, improving the chances of local control, is not always completed because of comorbidity-associated factors. Does an alternative exist between a 5-week radiotherapy regime and no irradiation after breast conservative surgery without burdening the overall therapeutic management? Methods. The authors review the literature regarding age-specific issues in the irradiation of breast cancer and the potential role of a partial breast irradiation (PBI) to prevent LR in the ipsilateral breast. Results. Phase II and III trials have been analyzed for feasibility, efficacy and toxicity. PBI may be delivered with low or high dose rate brachytherapy and intra operative, or external beam radiation therapy. PBI satisfies the control quality criteria. The majority of the teams provide PBI recurrence rates lower than 5% (0–4.4%) with a median follow-up varying between 8 and 72 months, associated with cosmetic results comparable to those achieved with conventional external beam. Conclusions. Breast cancer in elderly women represents a medical and economical problem. The recommended conservative treatment includes RT for 50 Gy over 5 weeks. Some subgroups of patients did not receive radiotherapy because of comorbidity-associated factors or more favorable tumor biology. PBI seems to be an acceptable alternative to adjuvant RT over 5 weeks and no irradiation. The evaluation of toxicity and efficacy, especially in terms of local control, is necessary and large multicentric phase III trials comparing the two irradiation approaches are needed, including quality of life, economic considerations and longer follow-up.

The aim of this study was to reexamine the prognostic role of tumor cell kinetics measured by S-phase fraction (SPF) and to establish its clinically relevant threshold values. SPF was determined by flow cytometry in a group of 920 consecutive breast cancer patients, all followed at our institute for 10 years (1988 to 1998). Mean age was 60.5 years (27–89 years). Median follow-up was 63 months (3–150 months). All patients had initial surgical treatment. SPF quartiles were: Q1=3.08%, median value = 5.98%, Q3=10.22%. A significant difference in overall specific survival was obtained between two populations divided by a cutoff at Q1 (p

Objective To evaluate clinical outcome after accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) in the elderly after high-dose-rate interstitial multi-catheter brachytherapy (HIBT). Methods and materials Between 2005 and 2013, 70 patients underwent APBI using HIBT. Catheter implant was performed intra or post-operatively (referred patients) after lumpectomy and axillary sentinel lymph node dissection. Once the pathological results confirmed the indication of APBI, planification CT-scan was performed to deliver 34 Gy/10f/5d or 32 Gy/8f/4d. Dose-volume adaptation was manually achieved (graphical optimization). Dosimetric results and clinical outcome were retrospectively analyzed. Physician cosmetic evaluation was reported. Results With a median follow-up of 60.9 months [4.6 – 90.1], median age was 80.7 years [62 – 93.1]. Regarding APBI ASTRO criteria, 61.4%, 18.6% and 20% were classified as suitable, cautionary and non-suitable respectively. Axillary sentinel lymph node dissection was performed in 94.3%; 8 pts (11.5%) presented an axillary involvement. A median dose of 34 Gy [32 – 35] in 8 to 10 fractions was delivered. Median CTV was 75.2 cc [16.9 – 210], median D90 EQD2 was 43.3 Gy [35 – 72.6] and median DHI was 0.54 [0.19 – 0.74]. One patient experienced ipsilateral recurrence (5-year local free recurrence rate: 97.6%. Five-year specific and overall survival rates were 97.9% and 93.2% respectively. Thirty-four patients (48%) presented 47 late complications classified grade 1 (80.8%) and grade 2 (19.2%) with no grade ≥ 3. Cosmetic results were considered excellent/good for 67 pts (95.7%). Conclusion APBI using HIBT and respecting strict rules of implantation and planification, represents a smart alternative between no post-operative irradiation and whole breast irradiation delivered over 6 consecutive weeks.

In developed countries, the cancer incidence is about 150 000 cases per year and half of people with cancer may die from the extension of the primary tumour in secondary deposits. This disaster costs more than 2 billion euro per year. People with cancer are often treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy of localized primary tumour and chemo-prevention of occult disseminated micrometastases. Since chemotherapy essentially targets cycling tumour cells, quiescent micrometastases which may contain only one cell may escape. We previously reported that human melanoma clones with high metastatic potential and low gangliosides content appeared very radiosensitive to low-dose ionizing radiation both in culture and in immunosuppressed animals. This exquisite radiosensitivity was observed with the highly metastatic single cells which were resting at the time of irradiation. These data are consistent with the dose–response relationship for the radiotherapy of secondary deposits which appears linear with no threshold. Highly metastatic cells at an early stage of growth also appear very sensitive to chemicals and activated immune cells. We propose the medical hypothesis according to which the spread of resting micrometastases should be prevented by a single fraction of total-body irradiation delivered at a dose sufficiently low (below 0.2 Gy) to avoid normal tissue radiotoxicity. Radio-prevention may complement standard treatments for patients with metastases and may be delivered even for patients in whom no distant metastases were detected on tumour diagnosis (M0 stage).

Resume Objectif de l’etude. – Les carcinomes epidermoides non resecables de l’oropharynx et de l’hypopharynx conservent un pronostic defavorable a court ou moyen terme. Plus de 70 % des patients decedent dans les cinq ans de part l’evolution locoregionale. Nous rapportons pour ces tumeurs l’experience du centre Antoine Lacassagne d'une association concomittante de radiotherapie bifractionnee non acceleree et chimiotherapie. L’observance, la toxicite, la reponse tumorale, la survie et la presence d’eventuels facteurs cliniques pronostiques associes a ce traitement ont ete evaluees. Patients et methodes. – Quatre-vingt douze patients consecutifs ont ete pris en charge par ce protocole de mai 1992 a fevrier 2000. Tous etaient atteints d’un carcinome epidermoide pharynge non resecable de stade IV. La radiotherapie de la tumeur primitive et des ganglions satellites a ete delivree par deux faisceaux paralleles opposes, par les photons d’un appareil de telecobaltherapie ou d’un accelerateur de 4 a 6 MV, a raison de deux fractions de 1,2 Gy/j, cinq jours par semaine, sans interruption en cours de traitement. Une dose totale de 80,4 Gy a ete delivree aux cancers de l’oropharynx en 46 jours et de 75,6 Gy en 44 jours a ceux de l’hypopharynx. La chimiotherapie a consiste en une administration de deux a trois cycles, tous les 21 jours, de cisplatine a la dose de 100 mg/m 2 , et de 5-fluoro-uracile en perfusion continue sur cinq jours a raison de 750 mg/m 2 /j (1 er cycle), 430 mg/m 2 /j (2 e et 3 e cycles). Une attention particuliere a ete accordee aux soins complementaires en cours de traitement, tels que la mise en place systematique d’une nutrition enterale et un traitement de la mucite par laser de basse energie. Resultats. – En dehors de deux deces precoces lies au traitement, la toxicite aigue, bien que significative (mucite de grades III et IV de l’OMS : 89 % dont 16 % de grades IV, epithelite de grade III de l’OMS : 72 %, neutropenie de grade III et IV : 61 %) n’a pas ete une cause d’interruption de traitement de plus d’une semaine, grâce notamment aux soins complementaires. Le taux de reponse complete a six mois etait de 74 %. Les taux actuariels de survie globale etaient respectivement a un et deux ans de 72 et 50 % avec un recul median de 17 mois. Les facteurs pronostiques de la survie globale etaient l’etat general (taux de survie globale a trois ans de 71 % si l’indice de Karnofsky du patient etait entre 90 et 100 %, 30 % s’il etait de 80 %, 0 % enfin s’il etait entre 60 et 70 %, p = 0,0001) et la localisation tumorale (taux de survie globale a trois ans de 28 % en cas de cancer de l’hypopharynx, 37 % en cas de cancer du panpharynx et 55 % en cas de cancer de l’oropharynx, p = 0,009). Conclusion. – L’analyse de ces resultats a confirme l’efficacite de la radiotherapie bifractionnee non acceleree concomitante a la chimiotherapie par cisplatine et 5-fluoro-uracile sur ce type de tumeur particulierement evoluee. Quant a l’etat general du patient avant traitement, seule une prise en charge nutritionnelle efficace peut conduire a une optimisation des conditions de realisation et de succes du protocole.

To determine the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) for initial and delayed inactivation of cells by a modulated proton beam suitable for the treatment of tumours of the eye, within the spread-out Bragg peak and in its distal declining edge.Human tumour SCC25 cells were irradiated with the 65 MeV proton beam at the Cyclotron Medicyc in Nice. Perspex plates of different thickness were used to simulate five positions along the beam line: 2mm corresponding to the entrance beam; 15.6 and 25 mm in the spread-out Bragg peak; 27.2 and 27.8mm for the distal edge. At each position clonogenic survival of the irradiated cells and of their progeny were determined at various dose values. 60Co gamma-rays were used as reference radiation.RBE values evaluated at the survival level given by 2 Gy of gamma-rays increased with increasing depth from close to 1.0 at the proximal to about 1.2 at the distal part of the peak. Within the declining edge it reached the value of about 1.4 at 27.2 and about 2 at 27.8 mm. For the progeny of irradiated cells, the RBE value ranged from 1.0 to 1.1 within the spread-out Bragg peak and then increased up to a value of 2.0 at the last position. The dose-effect curves for the progeny always had a larger shoulder than for the irradiated progenitors, their alpha parameters being lower by a factor of about 4 and their beta parameters always being higher. The alpha/beta ratio was about 50 Gy for the progenitors and about 6 Gy for their progeny. The incidence of delayed effects increased with dose and with the depth within the beam.RBE values for the inactivation of cells irradiated in the spread-out Bragg peak are compatible with the value currently assumed in clinical applications. In the distal declining edge of the beam, the RBE values increased significantly to an extent that may be of concern when the region of the treatment volume is close to sensitive tissues. The yield of delayed reproductive cell death was significant at each position along the beam line.

Despite the fact that fast neutron irradiation of glioblastoma has shown on autopsies an ability to sterilize tumors, no therapeutic windows have been found for these particles due to their toxicity toward normal brain. Therefore, the Boron Neutron Capture Enhancement (BNCE) of fast neutron beam has been suggested. This paper addresses the problem of fast neutron beam collimation, which induces a dramatic decrease of the thermal neutron flux in the depth of the tissues when smaller irradiation fields are used. Thermoluminescent dosimeter TLD-600 and TLD-700 were used to determine the thermal neutron flux within a Plexiglas phantom irradiated under the Nice Biomedical Cyclotron p(60)+Be(32) fast neutron beam. A BNCE of 4.6% in physical dose was determined for a 10×10 cm2 field, and of 10.4% for a 20×20 cm2 one. A Dose Modification Factor of 1.19 was calculated for CAL 58 glioblastoma cells irradiated thanks to the larger field. In order to increase the thermal flux in depth while shaping the beam, heavy material collimation was studied with Monte Carlo simulations using coupled FLUKA and MCNP-4A codes. The use of 20 cm width lead blocks allowed a 2 fold thermal neutron flux increase in the depth of the phantom, while shielding the fast neutron beam with a fast neutron dose transmission of 23%. Using the DMF of 1.19, a BNCE of 40% was calculated in the beam axis. This enhancement might be sufficient to open, at least theoretically, a therapeutic window.

In an effort to clarify the relationship between sensitivity of human tumour cells to low-LET and to fast neutron irradiation, 10 human tumour cell lines were exposed to cobalt gamma-rays and to 60 MeV (p -Be+) neutron beam. The data were pooled with results of 31 human tumour cell lines previously published. The analysis of date using the linear-quadratic model indicated that not only alpha values increased after neutron irradiation, but so did beta values too, although to a lesser extent. The mean inactivation dose (MID) was derived for each cell line from the linear-quadratic parameters after low-LET and high-LET exposure. MID values following neutron irradiation were closely correlated to those after gamma-ray irradiation. In these 41 cell lines, the extreme values of RBE derived by the ratio of MID varied by a factor of 3 among the cell lines. RBE was positively correlated to photon MID, meaning that intrinsically radiation resistant tumour cells have a higher neutron RBE, on average. Similar findings were observed if alpha ratios were used instead of MID ratios. In addition, the RBE/dose variations were more marked in cells with the higher RBE. Taken together, these data suggest that, although considerable variations exist among human tumour cell lines, intrinsically radioresistant cells are relatively more sensitized when exposed to high LET beams than radioresponsive tumours. An 'intrinsic gain factor' may thus be expected in irradiating radiation resistant tumours with fast neutrons, in addition to the hypoxic or kinetic gain factors. Because the quadratic component is still present after neutron irradiation, we suggest using MID ratio as a reference RBE when comparing survival curves of cells exposed to radiations of different qualities.

Summary The proton therapy facility of the Centre Antoine-Lacassagne in Nice began treatment of ocular tumors in June 1991. Up to October 1995, a total number of 600 patients were treated. An overview of the cases treated during the first 4 years of activity is given and the main problems encountered in the field, possibly interacting with the accuracy and reliability of the dose distribution, are listed.

Radiation therapy with positively charged particles implies that the Bragg peak be spread out to deliver a homogeneous dose to the tumour. The spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) has a higher linear energy transfer (LET) than the entrance beam. In addition, there is an LET gradient from proximal to distal SOBP. The aim of this study is to find out whether these small LET variations lead to differences in radiation response. Human melanoma cells (CAL4) were exposed to 65 MeV proton beams produced by the cyclotron Medicyc at five different positions: 2 mm depth corresponding to the entrance, 15, 20, 25 and 26.8 mm depth corresponding to four different positions in the half-modulated SOBP. Survival curves were generated using the in vitro colony method and fitted with the linear-quadratic model. Survival differences were observed at high doses; they were statistically significant at a dose of 8 Gy. With respect to the entrance position (2 mm), the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) at 1% survival was 1.09, 1.12, 1.19 and 1.27 at 15, 20, 25 and 26.8 mm in the SOBP, respectively. Whereas RBE values in the SOBP greater than 1.0 relative to the entrance beam represent a small biological advantage to be added to the well-known physical advantage of high energy proton beams; the RBE gradient along the SOBP would imply that the distal end of the tumour would receive a higher biologically equivalent dose than the proximal end, despite a homogeneous physical dose, especially at the high doses per fraction given in ocular melanomas. Although the increase in effectiveness with depth is mild, it should be kept in mind during eye treatment planning, in case a critical target is present at the extreme end of the SOBP.

Purpose: Young age is known to be an independent factor for developing local recurrence (LR) in breast cancer patients. It has also been shown that the occurrence of LR negatively affects patient outcome, especially if LR occurs within 3 years after treatment of the primary tumour. The question whether the impact of LR on patient outcome differs according to the patient’s age has not been addressed before. The purpose of the present study is to investigate cancer-specific survival (CSS) as well as overall survival after LR in young patients (Patients and Methods: Between 1974 and 2003, 2,130 breast cancer patients were treated with conservative surgery and axillary dissection. All of them received post-operative radiotherapy. Adjuvant chemo- and/or hormonal therapy was given according to the prognostic factors and the treatment policy at the time of diagnosis. Only biopsy-confirmed ipsilateral LRs were taken into account. Early LRs were those observed within 36 months after surgery, and late LRs were those which occurred thereafter. The median follow-up was 100 months. Survival analysis was conducted with the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The median age was 59 years. There were 472 patients aged Conclusion: Although young patients experience more LR than older ones, once LR occurs, young patients have a better outcome than the others. Possible hypotheses are: (1) more aggressive treatment in young patients after LR; (2) the treatment is better sustained in young patients; (3) biological differences in the characteristics of LR.

Purpose To assess early clinical results and evaluate patient satisfaction in case of second conservative treatment (2nd CT) combining lumpectomy plus high-dose rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy for patients (pts) presenting with ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence (IBCR). Methods and Materials From June 2005 to July 2009, 42 pts presenting with an IBCR underwent a second lumpectomy with intraoperative implantation of plastic tubes in the tumor bed. After performing the dose distribution analysis on the postimplant CT scan, a total dose of 34 Gy in 10 fractions over 5 consecutive days was delivered. Toxicity evaluation was based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 criteria. Applying a visual analogic scale (VAS) analysis, patient satisfaction regarding cosmetic result and 2nd CT possibility was performed after the end of brachytherapy. Results Median followup was 21 months (range, 6–50 months) and median age at the time of local recurrence was 65 years (range, 30–85 years). Median delay between primary and recurrence was 11 years (range, 1–35 years). Median recurrence tumor size was 12 mm (range, 2–30 mm). Median number of plastic tubes and planes were nine (range, 5–12) and two (range, 1–3), respectively. Median clinical target volume was 68 cc (range, 31.2–146 cc). Second local control rate was 97%. Twenty-two pts (60%) developed complications. Cutaneous and subcutaneous fibrosis was the most frequent side effect. Median VAS satisfaction score regarding cosmetic result was 7 of 10 (range, 4–9), whereas median VAS satisfaction score for 2nd CT was 10 of 10 (range, 8–10). Conclusion A 2nd CT for IBCR using high-dose rate brachytherapy seems feasible with encouraging results in terms of second local control with an acceptable toxicity. Patient satisfaction regarding the possibility of second breast preservation should be considered.

Background: Treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains palliative. Patients with MBC represent a heterogeneous group whose prognosis and outcome may be dependent on host factors. The purpose of the present study was dual: first, to draw up a list of factors easily available in everyday clinical practice requiring no sophisticated or costly methods and second, to provide results from a large cohort of women who underwent diagnostic and treatment at a single institution. Patients and methods: From 1975 to 2005, a total of 1038 women with MBC during their follow-up were included in this retrospective analysis. Patients were subsequently assigned to five groups according to the period of metastatic diagnosis. Results: It is shown that age at initial diagnosis, hormonal receptor status and site of metastasis are the most relevant prognostic factors for predicting survival from the time of metastastic occurrence. It is also shown that a metastasis-free interval is an easily and immediately available multifactorial prognostic index reflecting the multiparametric variability of the disease. Conclusion: These fundamental observations may assist physicians in evaluating the survival potential of patients and in directing them toward the appropriate therapeutic decision.

Purpose Robotic stereotactic radioablation (RSR) allows stereotactic irradiation of thoracic tumors; however, it has never been used for breast tumors and may have a real potential. We conducted a Phase I study, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), a two-level dose-escalation study (6.5 Gy × 3 fractions and 7.5 Gy × 3 fractions) using RSR and breast-conserving surgery followed by conventional radiotherapy. Materials and Methods To define toxicity, we performed a dermatologic exam (DE) including clinical examination by two independent observers and technical examination by colorimetry, dermoscopy, and skin ultrasound. DE was performed before NACT (DE0), at 36 days (DE1), at 56 days (DE2), after the NACT treatment onset, and before surgery (DE3). Surgery was performed 4–8 weeks after the last chemotherapy session. A pathologic examination was also performed. Results There were two clinical complete responses and four clinical partial responses at D56 and D85. Maximum tolerable dose was not reached. All patients tolerated RSR with no fatigue; 2 patients presented with mild pain after the third fraction of the treatment. There was no significant toxicity measured with ultrasound and dermoscopy tests. Postoperative irradiation (50 Gy) has been delivered without toxicity. Conclusion The study showed the feasibility of irradiation with RSR combined with chemotherapy and surgery for breast tumors. There was no skin toxicity at a dose of 19.5 Gy or 22.5 Gy delivered in three fractions combined with chemotherapy. Lack of toxicity suggested that the dose could be increased further. Pathologic response was acceptable.

Although most institutions treat all fields each day, some radiotherapists continue to adopt an alternate day schedule. The resulting daily variations of the dose per fraction in laterally located targets have been analyzed using the linear-quadratic model. Patients with breast carcinoma treated with definitive radiotherapy in 1974-1975 with one field a day were studied. An effective dose per fraction was derived, with a value higher than the average dose per fraction received by the reference point. The greater the fluctuations between the doses per fraction on successive days, the higher the effective dose per fraction. The corresponding cell survival due to alternate treatment as compared to survival with daily treatment depends on the alpha/beta ratio. For a late effect with low alpha/beta ratio, an alternate treatment may lead to almost 10-fold increase in cell kill in these lateral targets such as those responsible for subcutaneous sclerosis as compared to daily treatment of all fields with the same total dose. Taking the average effective dose per fraction in our series, the increase in cell kill was 4-fold. Acute effects would suffer less damage due to alternate treatment because of a high alpha/beta ratio. Treatment on an alternate schedule should be restricted to palliative radiotherapy.

Objectives: To investigate whether some aspects of patient or tumor characteristics influence the timing of local recurrence (LR) in breast cancer treated conservatively, and to assess the impact of the timing of LR on patient outcome. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients treated with conservative breast surgery followed by radiotherapy for breast carcinoma who developed LR. Out of 2,008 cases treated in our Institute between 1977 and 2002, 180 ipsilateral LR were observed. Of these, 46 LR were observed within 36 months after treatment, called early local recurrence (ELR), 44 developed between 37 and 60 months, called medium local recurrence (MLR), and 90 occurred after 60 months, called late local recurrence (LLR). Patient and tumor characteristics were analyzed in the 2 groups and compared. Results: Primary tumors >20 mm were more frequently found in patients with ELR (31%) than in patients with LLR (17%, p = 0.047). Grade 3 tumors were more often encountered in patients with ELR than in patients with LLR (27 versus 7%, p = 0.0002). Patients with ELR more frequently had tumors with negative estrogen receptors than patients with LLR (37% versus 6%, p < 0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in the axillary lymph node (LN) status between patients with ELR and those with LLR (35 and 23% of positive LN, respectively, p = 0.24). Tumor size, grade, LN status, hormone receptors and the timing of LR affected the specific survival (SS) from initial surgery. On multivariate analysis, only LN status and the timing of LR retained an independent prognostic value, with an odds ratio of 6.7 for ELR. After LR, the SS was also influenced by all of the above factors, and on multivariate analysis, LN status, hormone receptors and the timing of LR were independent predictors with an odds ratio of SS of 2.50 in case of ELR (p = 0.006). The 5-year SS after LR for ELR, MLR and LLR were 55.8, 74.8 and 79.5%, respectively. Conclusions: Unfavorable tumor characteristics such as big size, high grade, lack of hormone receptors, but not LN status, were associated with ELR. These findings suggest that patients with such aggressive tumor characteristics who do not recur early will have a lower risk of LLR than patients with more favorable factors.

Anaemia is frequently diagnosed in patients with cancer, and may have a detrimental effect on quality of life (QoL). We previously conducted a systematic literature review (1996-2003) to produce evidence-based guidelines on the use of erythropoietic proteins in anaemic patients with cancer.[Bokemeyer C, Aapro MS, Courdi A, et al. EORTC guidelines for the use of erythropoietic proteins in anaemic patients with cancer. Eur J Cancer 2004;40:2201-2216.] We report here an update to these guidelines, including literature published through to November 2005. The results of this updated systematic literature review have enabled us to refine our guidelines based on the full body of data currently available. Level I evidence exists for a positive impact of erythropoietic proteins on haemoglobin (Hb) levels when administered to patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia or anaemia of chronic disease, when used to prevent cancer anaemia, and in patients undergoing cancer surgery. The addition of further Level I studies confirms our recommendation that in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, treatment with erythropoietic proteins should be initiated at a Hb level of 9-11 g/dL based on anaemia-related symptoms rather than a fixed Hb concentration. Early intervention with erythropoietic proteins may be considered in asymptomatic anaemic patients with Hb levels 11.9 g/dL provided that individual factors like intensity and expected duration of chemotherapy are considered. Patients whose Hb level is below 9 g/dL should primarily be evaluated for need of transfusions potentially followed by the application of erythropoietic proteins. We do not recommend the prophylactic use of erythropoietic proteins to prevent anaemia in patients undergoing chemotherapy or radiotherapy who have normal Hb levels at the start of treatment, as the literature has not shown a benefit with this approach. The addition of further supporting studies confirms our recommendation that the target Hb concentration following treatment with erythropoietic proteins should be 12-13 g/dL. Once this level is achieved, maintenance doses should be titrated individually. There is Level I evidence that dosing of erythropoietic proteins less frequently than three times per week is efficacious when used to treat chemotherapy-induced anaemia or prevent cancer anaemia, with studies supporting the use of epoetin alfa and epoetin beta weekly and darbepoetin alfa given every week or every 3 weeks. We do not recommend the use of higher than standard initial doses of erythropoietic proteins with the aim of producing higher haematological responses, due to the limited body of evidence available. There is Level I evidence that, within reasonable limits of body weight, fixed doses of erythropoietic proteins can be used to treat patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia. This analysis confirms that there are no baseline predictive factors of response to erythropoietic proteins that can be routinely used in clinical practice if functional iron deficiency or vitamin deficiency is ruled out; a low serum erythropoietin (EPO) level (only in haematological malignancies) appears to be the only predictive factor to be verified in Level I studies. Further studies are needed to investigate the value of hepcidin, c-reactive protein, and other measures as predictive factors. In these updated guidelines, we explored a new question of whether oral or intravenous iron supplementation increases the response rate to erythropoietic proteins. We found no evidence of increased response with the addition of oral iron supplementation, but there is Level II evidence of improved response to erythropoietic proteins with the addition of intravenous iron. However, the doses and schedules for intravenous iron supplementation are not yet well defined, and further studies in this area are warranted. The two major goals of erythropoietic protein therapy are prevention or elimination of transfusions and improvement of QoL. The total body of evidence shows that red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirements are reduced following treatment with erythropoietic proteins. This analysis also confirms that QoL is significantly improved in patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia and in those with anaemia of chronic disease following erythropoietic protein therapy, with more robust evidence now available that QoL was improved in studies investigating early intervention in cases of chemotherapy- or radiotherapy-induced anaemia. There is only indirect evidence that patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia or anaemia of chronic disease initially classified as non-responders to standard doses proceed to respond to treatment following a dose increase. None of the studies addressed the question in a prospective, randomised fashion, and so the Taskforce does not recommend dose escalation as a general approach in all patients who are not responding. There is still insufficient data to determine the effect on survival following treatment with erythropoietic proteins in conjunction with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Our analysis of survival endpoints in studies involving patients receiving radio(chemo)therapy found that most studies were inconclusive, with no clear link between the use of erythropoietic proteins and survival. Likewise, we found no clear link between erythropoietic therapy and other endpoints such as local tumour control, time to progression, and progression-free survival. There is no evidence that pure red cell aplasia occurs in cancer patients following treatment with erythropoietic proteins, and the fear of this condition developing should not lead to erythropoietic proteins being withheld in patients with cancer. There is Level I evidence that the risk of thromboembolic events and hypertension are slightly elevated in patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia receiving erythropoietic proteins. Additional trials are warranted, especially to define the optimal doses and schedules of intravenous iron supplementation during erythropoietic therapy. While our review did not address cost benefit evaluations in detail, the consensus is that studies taking into account all real determinants of cost and benefit need to be performed prospectively.

Summary The organization of a networking for patient recruitment is a main concern for a new facility using charged particles. The experience of choroidal melanoma in Nice demonstrates the possibility to create “de novo” a protontherapy center treating a sufficient number of patients. The influence of the opening of new facilities is analyzed.

Background and purpose To evaluate early and late reactions, local control, disease-free survival, cause-specific survival, and overall survival of elderly breast cancer patients treated with definitive once-a-week hypofractionated radiotherapy together with hormonal therapy. Patients and methods Between 1987 and 1999, 115 patients with a median age of 83 presenting with 124 non-metastatic breast carcinoma were treated with definitive once weekly hypofractionated radiotherapy associated with hormonal therapy. The main reasons for adopting this schedule were patient refusal of surgery, very old age, locally advanced case, and/or comorbid disease. Radiation was delivered as once-a-week, 6.5 Gy for a total breast dose of 32.5 Gy in five fractions, followed with 1–3 fractions of 6.5 Gy to the tumour site. The median follow-up was 41 months. Results Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy led to 56% reduction of the tumour volume. Late reactions occurred in 46 patients; they were mild to moderate in 87% of these patients. The Kaplan–Meier rate was 52% of patients, with 6% experiencing grade 3 reactions. The 5-year local progression-free rate was 78%. The corresponding cause-specific survival was 71%, and was influenced by T classification, nodal status, oestrogen receptors and the total dose. The first three factors retained an independent prognostic impact on multivariate analysis. The 5-year overall survival was 38%. It was affected by the T classification, lymph node involvement and the performance status (PS). Using a multivariate analysis, only T classification and PS were identified as independent factors regarding overall survival. Conclusions Definitive hypofractionated radiotherapy allows a good local control, with acceptable toxicity. This schedule associated with hormonal therapy is a good alternative to surgery in non-operable old patients and in case of patient refusal to surgery and to standard fractionation.

Purpose: Brain tumor radiotherapy requires the volume measurements and the localization of several individual brain structures. Any tool that can assist the physician to perform the delineation would then be of great help. Among segmentation methods, those that are atlas-based are appealing because they are able to segment several structures simultaneously, while preserving the anatomy topology. This study aims to evaluate such a method in a clinical context. Methods and Materials: The brain atlas is made of two three-dimensional (3D) volumes: the first is an artificial 3D magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); the second consists of the segmented structures in this artificial MRI. The elastic registration of the artificial 3D MRI against a patient 3D MRI dataset yields an elastic transformation that can be applied to the labeled image. The elastic transformation is obtained by minimizing the sum of the square differences of the image intensities and derived from the optical flow principle. This automatic delineation (AD) enables the mapping of the segmented structures onto the patient MRI. Parameters of the AD have been optimized on a set of 20 patients. Results are obtained on a series of 6 patients’ MRI. A comprehensive validation of the AD has been conducted on performance of atlas-based segmentation in a clinical context with volume, position, sensitivity, and specificity that are compared by a panel of seven experimented physicians for the brain tumor treatments. Results: Expert interobserver volume variability ranged from 16.70 cm 3 to 41.26 cm 3 . For patients, the ratio of minimal to maximal volume ranged from 48% to 70%. Median volume varied from 19.47 cm 3 to 27.66 cm 3 and volume of the brainstem calculated by AD varied from 17.75 cm 3 to 24.54 cm 3 . Medians of experts ranged, respectively, for sensitivity and specificity, from 0.75 to 0.98 and from 0.85 to 0.99. Median of AD were, respectively, 0.77 and 0.97. Mean of experts ranged, respectively, from 0.78 to 0.97 and from 0.86 to 0.99. Mean of AD were, respectively, 0.76 and 0.97. Conclusions: Results demonstrate that the method is repeatable, provides a good trade-off between accuracy and robustness, and leads to reproducible segmentation and labeling. These results can be improved by enriching the atlas with the rough information of tumor or by using different laws of deformation for the different structures. Qualitative results also suggest that this method can be used for automatic segmentation of other organs such as neck, thorax, abdomen, pelvis, and limbs. © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Brain tumors, Radiotherapy, Magnetic resonance imaging, Segmentation matching.

International audience; Recently, radiotherapy possibilities have been dramatically increased by software and hardware developments. Improvements in medical imaging devices have increased the importance of three-dimensional (3D) images as the complete examination of these data by a physician is not possible. Computer techniques are needed to present only the pertinent information for clinical applications. We describe a technique for an automatic 3D reconstruction of the eye and CT scan merging with fundus photographs (retinography). The final result is a "virtual eye" to guide ocular tumor protontherapy. First, we make specific software to automatically detect the position of the eyeball, the optical nerve, and the lens in the CT scan. We obtain a 3D eye reconstruction using this automatic method. Second, we describe the retinography and demonstrate the projection of this modality. Then we combine retinography with a reconstructed eye, using a CT scan to get a virtual eye. The result is a computer 3D scene rendering a virtual eye into a skull reconstruction. The virtual eye can be useful for the simulation, the planning, and the control of ocular tumor protontherapy. It can be adapted to treatment planning to automatically detect eye and organs at risk position. It should be highlighted that all the image processing is fully automatic to allow the reproduction of results, this is a useful property to conduct a consistent clinical validation. The automatic localization of the organ at risk in a CT scan or an MRI by automatic software could be of great interest for radiotherapy in the future for comparison of one patient at different times, the comparison of different treatments centers, the possibility of pooling results of different treatments centers, the automatic generation of doses-volumes histograms, the comparison between different treatment planning for the same patient and the comparison between different patients at the same time. It will also be less time consuming.

The pre-treatment labelling index (LI) was measured in 72 patients with carcinoma of the cervix. It was not correlated with patient age, stage of the disease or histological grade. 46 patients underwent hysterectomy after intracavitary irradiation with or without external radiotherapy. The mean LI in patients with tumour sterilization or microscopic residue was significantly higher than in patients with gross disease. These results suggest that tumours with low LI may be difficult to sterilize with conventional therapeutic measures, or that doomed cells may require several weeks to be eliminated in tumours with low LI.

International audience; no abstract

In fast neutron therapy, the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of a given beam varies to a large extent with the neutron energy spectrum. This spectrum depends primarily on the energy of the incident particles and on the nuclear reaction used for neutron production. However, it also depends on other factors which are specific to the local facility, eg, target, collimation system, etc. Therefore direct radiobiological intercomparisons are justified. The present paper reports the results of an intercomparison performed at seven neutrontherapy centres: Orleans, France (p(34)+Be), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (p(26)+Be), Ghent, Belgium (d(14.5)+Be), Faure, South Africa (p(66)+Be), Detroit, USA (d(48)+Be), Nice, France (p(65)+Be) and Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium (p(65)+Be). The selected radiobiological system was intestinal crypt regeneration in mice after single fraction irradiation. The observed RBE values (ref cobalt-60 gamma-rays) were 1.79 +/- 0.10, 1.84 +/- 0.07, 2.24 +/- 0.11, 1.55 +/- 0.04, 1.51 +/- 0.03, 1.50 +/- 0.04 and 1.52 +/- 0.04, respectively. When machine availability permitted, additional factors were studied: two vs one fraction (Ghent, Louvain-la-Neuve), dose rate (Detroit), influence of depth in phantom (Faure, Detroit, Nice, Louvain-la-Neuve). In addition, at Orleans and Ghent, RBEs were also determined for LD50 at 6 days after selective abdominal irradiation and were found to be equal to the RBEs for crypt regeneration. The radiobiological intercomparisons were always combined with direct dosimetric intercomparisons and, when possible in some centres, with microdosimetric investigations.

A number of data measuring survival of animal or human cells to low LET ionizing radiation have demonstrated that these cells may be hypersensitive to doses below 1 Gy, possibly due to the absence of an inducible repair mechanism, which is observed at higher doses. The production of micronuclei (MN) in cells exposed to ionizing radiation reflects genotoxic damage. Moreover, the micronucleus assay is sensitive to low radiation doses. We have exposed 10 human tumour cell lines to doses ranging between 0.12 and 4 Gy. Using cytochalasin B to block the cells in a binucleate phase, we have scored the fraction of binucleate cells (BNC) expressing MN, as well as the number of MN per BNC, as a function of γ-ray dose. Experimental points were fitted with a binomial equation. Doses from 1 to 4 Gy were fitted separately from those below 1 Gy, and the initial slopes after both fits were compared. Taken together, the initial slopes of MN induction after low-dose (LD) irradiation were not different from those after high-dose (HD) irradiation. Only in one cell line was a significant increase in MN production detected after LD irradiation. This cell line had the shallowest linear term after HD irradiation. It appeared that the likeliness of expressing hypersensitivity at LD was correlated with the quadratic term of MN induction at HD, which does not contradict an inducible repair hypothesis. However, the failure of observation of a significant hypersensitivity at LD for nine cell lines, and the high variability of response at LD suggests that this occasional effect may be influenced by other factors as well.