Search

Objective Persistent (≥2 months) major salivary gland enlargement in primary SS (pSS) patients is a well-known sign of possible involvement by B cell lymphoma. The study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and safety of US-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) of major salivary glands compared with open surgical biopsy. Methods Prospective pSS patients (cases) with clinically persistent salivary gland enlargement underwent US-guided CNB and were compared with retrospective pSS patients (controls) submitted to open surgical biopsy. The features analysed were pre-biopsy clinical and laboratory findings, adequacy of the material for histology and diagnostic-rendered and biopsy-related complications (reported by the patient with a questionnaire and clinically verified). Results Thirteen cases underwent US-guided CNB: in nine, biopsy was performed on the parotid gland and in four it was performed on the submandibular gland. Sufficient material was obtained for pathological diagnosis in all samples. The final diagnoses were 5 (38.5%) B cell lymphoma, 1 (7.7%) lymphoepithelial sialadenitis, 4 (30.7%) other sialadenitis (granulomatous consistent with sarcoidosis, IgG4-related disease, chronic sclerosing, diffuse chronic) and 3/13 (23.1%) miscellaneous lesions. Thirteen controls underwent open surgical biopsy of the parotid. In one, inadequate material was obtained, while in 12 (92.3%) the pathologic diagnoses were 4 (33.3%) B cell lymphoma, 2 (16.7%) lymphoepithelial sialadenitis, 4 (33.3%) uncertain lymphoproliferative lesions and 2 (16.7%) miscellaneous lesions. Six cases (46.1%) reported six transient complications and 12/13 (92.3%) controls had 2 persistent and 14 transient complications. Conclusion US-guided CNB represents a novel, clinically relevant and safe approach for the management of pSS patients with parotid or submandibular persistent enlargement.

Kidney transplantation (KT) is an effective treatment for end-stage renal disease. Despite their rate has reduced over time, post-transplant complications still represent a major clinical problem because of the associated risk of graft failure and loss. Thus, post-KT complications should be diagnosed and treated promptly. Imaging plays a pivotal role in this setting. Grayscale ultrasound (US) with color Doppler analysis is the first-line imaging modality for assessing complications, although many findings lack specificity. When performed by experienced operators, contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) has been advocated as a safe and fast tool to improve the accuracy of US. Also, when performing CEUS there is potentially no need for further imaging, such as contrast-enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, which are often contraindicated in recipients with impaired renal function. This technique is also portable to patients' bedside, thus having the potential of maximizing the cost-effectiveness of the whole diagnostic process. Finally, the use of blood-pool contrast agents allows translating information on graft microvasculature into time-intensity curves, and in turn quantitative perfusion indexes. Quantitative analysis is under evaluation as a tool to diagnose rejection or other causes of graft dysfunction. In this paper, we review and illustrate the indications to CEUS in the post-KT setting, as well as the main CEUS findings that can help establishing the diagnosis and planning the most adequate treatment.

Purpose To compare the sensitivity for breast cancer (BC) and BC size estimation of preoperative contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI) versus combined unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (UMRI) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Patients and methods We retrospectively included 56 women who underwent DBT and preoperative 1.5 T CEMRI between January 2016–February 2017. Three readers with 2–10 years of experience in CEMRI and DBT, blinded to pathology, independently reviewed CEMRI (diffusion-weighted imaging [DWI], T2-weighted imaging, pre- and post-contrast T1-weighted imaging) and a combination of UMRI (DWI and pre-contrast T1-weighted imaging) and DBT. We calculated per-lesion sensitivity of CEMRI and UMRI + DBT, and the agreement between CEMRI, UMRI and DBT versus pathology in assessing cancer size (Bland-Altman analysis). Logistic regression was performed to assess features predictive of cancer missing. Results We included 70 lesions (64% invasive BC, 36% ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive BC with in situ component). UMRI + DBT showed lower sensitivity (86–89%) than CEMRI (94–100%), with a significant difference for the most experienced reader only (p = 0.008). False-positives were fewer with UMRI + DBT (4–5) than with CEMRI (18–25), regardless of the reader (p = 0.001–0.005). For lesion size, UMRI showed closer limits of agreement with pathology than CEMRI or DBT. Cancer size ≤1 cm was the only independent predictor for cancer missing for both imaging strategies (Odds ratio 8.62 for CEMRI and 19.16 for UMRI + DBT). Conclusions UMRI + DBT showed comparable sensitivity and less false-positives than CEMRI in the preoperative assessment of BC. UMRI was the most accurate tool to assess cancer size., Highlights • Combined UMRI + DBT shows high sensitivity in the preoperative assessment of breast cancer. • UMRI + DBT avoids most false-positives induced by CEMRI. • In combined imaging, UMRI is the better predictor of cancer size at pathology. • UMRI + DBT is a potential alternative to CEMRI in the preoperative assessment of breast cancer.

Objectives: To compare the effect of different PSA density (PSAD) thresholds on the accuracy for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) of the Prostate Imaging Reporting And Data System v.2.1 (PI-RADSv2.1). Methods: We retrospectively included 123 biopsy-naïve men who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and transperineal mpMRI-targeted and systematic prostate biopsy between April 2019 and October 2020. mpMRI, obtained on a 3.0T magnet with a PI-RADSv2.1-compliant protocol, was read by two radiologists (>1500/>500 mpMRI examinations). csPCa was defined as International Society of Urogenital Pathology grading group ≥2. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to calculate per-index lesion sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of PI-RADSv.2.1 categories after adjusting for PSAD ≥0.10,≥0.15, and ≥0.20 ng/mL ml−1. Per-adjusted category cancer detection rate (CDR) was calculated, and decision analysis performed to compare PSAD-adjusted PI-RADSv.2.1 categories as a biopsy trigger. Results: csPCa prevalence was 43.9%. PSAD-adjustment increased the CDR of PI-RADSv2.1 category 4. Sensitivity/specificity/AUC were 92.6%/53.6%/0.82 for unadjusted PI-RADS, and 85.2%/72.4%/0.84, 62.9%/85.5%/0.83, and 92.4%/53.6%/0.82 when adjusting PI-RADS categories for a 0.10, 0.15, and 0.20 ng/ml ml−1 PSAD threshold, respectively. Triggering biopsy for PI-RADS four lesions and PSAD ≥0.10 ng/mL ml−1 was the strategy with greatest net benefit at 30 and 40% risk probability (0.307 and 0.271, respectively). Conclusions: PI-RADSv2.1 category four with PSAD ≥0.10 ng/mL ml−1 was the biopsy-triggering cut-off with the highest net benefit in the range of expected prevalence for csPCa. Advances in knowledge: 0.10 ng/mL ml−1 is the PSAD threshold with higher clinical utility in stratifying the risk for prostate cancer of PI-RADSv.2.1 categories.

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) has emerged as a main issue in non Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) immunocompromised hosts, exposing patients to high mortality rates, especially when the diagnosis is delayed. Since microbiological confirmation is often unfeasible or difficult to obtain, High-resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) represents a main tool for guiding the diagnosis in the appropriate clinical scenario. Nevertheless, radiologists must be aware that PJP at HRCT is a multifaceted process, with a variety of common and less frequent findings, along with a broad spectrum of infectious (e.g., viral and certain fungal and bacterial pneumonias) and non-infectious (e.g., pulmonary oedema, diffuse alveolar haemorrhage, and drug toxicity) differential diagnoses. In this review we resume background clinical information on PJP in non-HIV immunocompromised patients, illustrate both typical and less frequent HRCT findings, and present the spectrum of infectious and non-infectious mimickers at HRCT, highlighting the similarities with PJP and providing clues for the differential diagnosis.

To compare preoperative contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CEM) versus digital mammography plus digital breast tomosynthesis (DM + DBT) in detecting breast cancer (BC) and assessing its size. We retrospectively included 78 patients with histological diagnosis of BC who underwent preoperative DM, DBT, and CEM over one year. Four readers, blinded to pathology and clinical information, independently evaluated DM + DBT versus CEM to detect BC and measure its size. Readers' experience ranged 3–10 years. We calculated the per-lesion cancer detection rate (CDR) and the complement of positive predictive value (1-PPV) of both methods, stratifying analysis on the total of lesions, index lesions, and additional lesions. The agreement in assessing cancer size versus pathology was assessed with Bland–Altman analysis. 100 invasive BCs (78 index lesions and 22 additional lesions) were analyzed. Compared to DM + DBT, CEM showed higher overall CDR in less experienced readers (range 0.85–0.90 vs. 0.95–0.96), and higher CDR for additional lesions, regardless of the reader (range 0.54–0.68 vs. 0.77–0.86). CEM increased the detection of additional disease in dense breasts in all readers and non-dense breasts in less experienced readers only. The 1-PPV of CEM (range 0.10–0.18) was comparable to that of DM + DBT (range 0.09–0.19). At Bland–Altman analysis, DM + DBT and CEM showed comparable mean differences and limits of agreement in respect of pathologic cancer size. Preoperative CEM improved the detection of additional cancer lesions compared to DM + DBT, particularly in dense breasts. CEM and DM + DBT achieved comparable performance in cancer size assessment.

Objective In patients with mild COVID-19 pneumonia, chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is advised when risk factors for severe disease (i.e., age > 65 years and/or comorbidities) are present, and can influence management strategy. The objective was to assess whether HRCT is associated to short-time development of severe disease in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods Seventy-seven consecutive patients (mean age, 64 ± 15 years) with mild COVID-19 pneumonia (no or mild respiratory failure) that underwent HRCT were retrospectively identified. Fifty-two on 77 patients had reported risk factors for severe disease. A chest-imaging devoted radiologist recorded, on a per-examination basis, the following HRCT features: ground-glass opacity, crazy-paving pattern, consolidation, organizing pneumonia (OP) pattern, mosaic attenuation, and nodules. The extent of each feature (total feature score, TFS) was semi-quantitatively assessed. Total lung involvement (TLI) was defined as the sum of all TFSs. The study outcome was defined as the occurrence of severe disease (moderate-to-severe respiratory failure) within 15 days from HRCT. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess if age, comorbidities, and HRCT features were associated to severe disease. Results On univariable analysis, severe disease was significantly associated with age > 59 years (29/47 patients, 61.7%) (p = 0.013), and not significantly associated with having comorbidities (22/44 patients, 50.0%). On multivariable analysis, TLI >15 and OP pattern >5 were independently associated to severe disease, with odds ratio of 8.380 (p = 0.003), and of 4.685 (p = 0.035), respectively. Conclusion Short-time onset of severe COVID-19 was associated to TLI >15 and OP pattern score > 5. Severe disease was not associated to comorbidities., Highlights • Chest computed tomography predicts progression to severe COVID-19 pneumonia • Chest computed tomography predicts clinical evolution in patients at lower risk • Extensive lung involvement and organizing pneumonia pattern predict severe disease

BackgroundIn women at high/intermediate lifetime risk of breast cancer (BC-LTR), contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) added to mammography ±ultrasound (Mx±US) increases sensitivity but decreases specificity. An alternative strategy, MRI alone, potentially more cost-effective, has never been explored. This study aims to assess the characteristics of women who participated in a randomized trial offering MRI alone.MethodsIn this feasibility multicentre randomized controlled trial we compared MRI alone versus Mx+US in women at intermediate BC-risk (allocation ratio 1:1). Eligible women were aged 40 –59, with a 15–30% LTR and/or extremely dense breasts. Two screening rounds per woman were planned in ten centres experienced in MRI screening. Primary endpoint: rate of cancers detected in the two arms after 5 years of follow-up. Secondary endpoints: distribution of the risk profiles among the women enrolled in the trial; distribution of pathological stages and histology of cancers detected; interval cancer rate in the two arms.ResultsFrom 07/2013 to 11/2015, 1,254 women (mean age 47 years) were enrolled: 624 were assigned to Mx+US, 630 to MRI. Most of them were aged below 50 (72%) and premenopausal (45%), 52% used oral contraceptives. Among postmenopausal women, 15% had used hormone replacement therapy. Breast and/or ovarian cancer in mother and/or sisters were reported by 37% of enrolled women, extreme breast density was recorded for 79%, 41% had a 15–30% BC-LTR.ConclusionsThe distribution of BC-risk profile major determinants (breast density and family of breast and ovarian cancer) of enrolled women varied across centres.Trial registrationNCT02210546Key pointsMammography plus ultrasound are commonly used to screen women with dense breastsSupplemental ultrasound increases BC detection rate but also false-positives and potential overdiagnosisWhether increased BC detection by US translates into reduced mortality is unknownMRI alone could be more risk- and cost-effective than mammography plus ultrasound

The term "connective tissue diseases" (CTDs) refers to a heterogeneous group of autoimmune disorders, including systemic sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren's syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, polymyositis, dermatomyositis, antisynthetase syndrome, and mixed connective tissue disease. Chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is the imaging method of choice for evaluating patients with known or suspected CTD-related interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD), a complication accounting for substantial morbidity and mortality. While specific HRCT patterns and signs of CTD-ILD have been extensively described (hence the designation "the usual suspects"), the knowledge of various, less frequent conditions involving the lungs in patients with CTD would help the radiologist produce a clinically valuable report, thus potentially influencing patient management. This paper aims to provide an up-to-date review of various unusual pulmonary CTD-related conditions the radiologist should be aware of; namely, acute exacerbation of CTD-ILD, CTD-related interstitial lung abnormalities, lung amyloidosis, MALT lymphoma, antisynthetase syndrome, pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis-like lesion, drug-induced ILD, combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema, and pulmonary hypertension. For each condition, the chest HRCT appearance and the key histopathological and clinical features are resumed, helping the radiologist participate actively in the multidisciplinary discussion of complex clinical cases.

Objectives Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can inform surgical planning but might cause overtreatment by increasing the mastectomy rate. The Multicenter International Prospective Analysis (MIPA) study investigated this controversial issue. Methods This observational study enrolled women aged 18–80 years with biopsy-proven breast cancer, who underwent MRI in addition to conventional imaging (mammography and/or breast ultrasonography) or conventional imaging alone before surgery as routine practice at 27 centers. Exclusion criteria included planned neoadjuvant therapy, pregnancy, personal history of any cancer, and distant metastases. Results Of 5896 analyzed patients, 2763 (46.9%) had conventional imaging only (noMRI group), and 3133 (53.1%) underwent MRI that was performed for diagnosis, screening, or unknown purposes in 692/3133 women (22.1%), with preoperative intent in 2441/3133 women (77.9%, MRI group). Patients in the MRI group were younger, had denser breasts, more cancers ≥ 20 mm, and a higher rate of invasive lobular histology than patients who underwent conventional imaging alone (p p p p Conclusions Clinicians requested breast MRI for women with a higher a priori probability of receiving mastectomy. MRI was associated with 11.3% more mastectomies, and with 3.2% fewer reoperations in the breast conservation subgroup. Key Points • In 19% of patients of the MIPA study, breast MRI was performed for screening or diagnostic purposes. • The current patient selection to preoperative breast MRI implies an 11% increase in mastectomies, counterbalanced by a 3% reduction of the reoperation rate. • Data from the MIPA study can support discussion in tumor boards when preoperative MRI is under consideration and should be shared with patients to achieve informed decision-making.

Objective The objective of the study was to assess the variability in the management of paediatric MHT in European emergency departments (EDs). Methods This was a multicentre retrospective study of children ≤18 years old with minor head trauma (MHT) (Glasgow Coma Scale ≥14) who presented to 15 European EDs between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 31. Data on clinical characteristics, imaging tests, and disposition of included patients were collected at each hospital over a 3-year period. Results We included 11 212 patients. Skull radiography was performed in 3416 (30.5%) patients, range 0.4-92.3%. A computed tomography (CT) was obtained in 696 (6.2%) patients, range 1.6-42.8%. The rate of admission varied from 0 to 48.2%. Conclusion We found great variability in terms of the type of imaging and rate of CT scan obtained. Our study suggests opportunity for improvement in the area of paediatric head injury and the need for targeted individualised ED interventions to improve management of MHT.

Contains fulltext : 225795.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) Despite its high diagnostic performance, the use of breast MRI in the preoperative setting is controversial. It has the potential for personalized surgical management in breast cancer patients, but two of three randomized controlled trials did not show results in favor of its introduction for assessing the disease extent before surgery. Meta-analyses showed a higher mastectomy rate in women undergoing preoperative MRI compared to those who do not. Nevertheless, preoperative breast MRI is increasingly used and a survey from the American Society of Breast Surgeons showed that 41% of respondents ask for it in daily practice. In this context, a large-scale observational multicenter international prospective analysis (MIPA study) was proposed under the guidance of the European Network for the Assessment of Imaging in Medicine (EuroAIM). The aims were (1) to prospectively and systematically collect data on consecutive women with a newly diagnosed breast cancer, not candidates for neoadjuvant therapy, who are offered or not offered breast MRI before surgery according to local practice; (2) to compare these two groups in terms of surgical and clinical endpoints, adjusting for covariates. The underlying hypotheses are that MRI does not cause additional mastectomies compared to conventional imaging, while reducing the reoperation rate in all or in subgroups of patients. Ninety-six centers applied to a web-based call; 36 were initially selected based on volume and quality standards; 27 were active for enrollment. On November 2018, the target of 7000 enrolled patients was reached. The MIPA study is presently at the analytic phase. Key Points • Breast MRI has a high diagnostic performance but its utility in the preoperative setting is controversial. • A large-scale observational multicenter prospective study was launched to compare women receiving with those not receiving preoperative MRI. • Twenty-seven centers enrolled more than 7000 patients. The study is presently at the analytic phase.

Background To compare the accuracy of multiple abbreviated multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-derived protocols in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Methods 108 men undergoing staging 3.0T mpMRI with a Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADSv2)-compliant protocol before radical prostatectomy (RP) were retrospectively evaluated. Two readers (R1, R2) independently analyzed mpMRI, assigning a PI-RADSv2 category to each observation as appearing on each examination sequence. A study coordinator assessed final PI-RADSv2 category by combining readers' assignments according to four protocols: short MRI (sMRI) (diffusion-weighted imaging + axial T2-weighted imaging), contrast-enhanced short MRI (cesMRI) (sMRI + dynamic contrast-enhanced [DCE] imaging), biparametric MRI (diffusion-weighted imaging + multiplanar T2-weigthed imaging), and mpMRI. Using RP pathology as the reference standard for csPCa, we calculated the per-lesion cancer detection rate (CDR) and false discovery rate (FDR) for each MRI protocol (cutoff PI-RADSv2 category ≥3), and the per-PI-RADSv2 category prevalence of csPCa and false positives. Results Pathology after RP found 142 csPCas with median International Society of Urogenital Pathology grade group 2, and stage ≤pT2c in 68.6% of cases. CDR was comparable across the four MRI protocols (74.6% to 75.3% for R1, and 68.3% for R2). FDR was comparable as well (14.4%-14.5% for R1 and 11.1% for R2). sMRI was the minimum protocol equaling mpMRI in terms of CDR, although cesMRI, similarly to mpMRI, was associated with fewer PI-RADSv2 category 3 assignments and higher prevalence of csPCa within PI-RADSv2 category 3 observations (66.7% versus 76.9% for R1, and 100% versus 91.7% for R2, respectively). Conclusions Among multiple abbreviated mpMRI-derived protocols, cesMRI was the one equaling mpMRI in terms of csPCa detection and minimizing PI-RADSv2 category 3 assignments.

Purpose of Review To critically review the evidence in favor or against the use of house dust mite (HDM) allergen avoidance measures in patients with asthma. Recent Findings Systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggested no positive effect of mite allergen avoidance strategies on asthma outcomes, resulting in a lack of consensus regarding the utility of these measures. However, such analyses have a number limitations and might not be the most adequate tool to evaluate current evidence and to derive clinical recommendations regarding mite allergen avoidance in asthmatic patients. We should not disproportionately rely on the results of meta-analyses and systematic reviews to inform clinical practice and asthma guidelines in this area. Recent high-quality evidence from randomized controlled trial in children confirmed that mite allergen–impermeable bed encasings reduce emergency hospital attendance with acute severe asthma exacerbations. Summary Until better evidence is available, we suggest that physicians should adopt a pragmatic approach to mite allergen avoidance and advise sensitized patients to implement a multifaceted set of measures to achieve as great a reduction in exposure as possible. Potential predictors of positive response (e.g., patient’s sensitization and exposure status) can pragmatically be evaluated using the size of skin test wheal or the titer of allergen-specific IgE. Finally, the intervention should be started as early as possible.

To investigate clinical, radiologic and pathologic features of B3 lesions diagnosed on VABB targeting microcalcifications, for identifying predictors of malignancy.This retrospective multi-centre study included consecutive VABBs performed over a 10-year period on suspicious microcalcifications not associated with other radiological signs diagnosed as B3 on histology from VABB, with outcomes ascertained by surgical excision. Clinical, demographic, radiological and histological (B3 subcategory) data were collected. For statistical analysis (univariate and binary logistic regression), the primary outcome variable was the upgrade rate to malignancy after surgery. Predictors of upgrade to malignancy were identified from clinical, demographic, radiological and pathological variables (including B3 subcategory).Amongst 447 VABBs, there were 57(12.7 %) upgrades to malignancy at surgical histology (36 DCIS and 21 invasive cancer). At univariate analysis, variables significantly associated with increased risk of upgrade to malignancy were age55 years (p = 0.01), lesion size10 mm (p 0.0001), BI-RADS 4b-c and 5 (p = 0.0001), and fine pleomorphic morphology (p = 0.002) of microcalcifications. Binary logistic regression confirmed as significant independent risk factors age, lesion size and BI-RADS category (p = 0.02, 0.02 and 0.0006 respectively). Amongst subcategories of B3 lesions, lobular neoplasia was significantly(p = 0.04) associated with upgrade, confirmed as an independent risk factor [p = 0.03, OR = 2.3(1.1-4.7)]. Flat epithelial atypia was significantly(p = 0.004) associated with reduced odds of upgrade, but binary logistic regression showed only borderline association [p = 0.052, OR = 0.4(0.2-1.01)].Across B3 lesions diagnosed on histology from VABB of suspicious microcalcifications, older age, size10 mm, BI-RADS category≥ 4b on imaging, and lobular neoplasia were risk factors for upgrade to malignancy. This information can be used to discuss patients' tailored management options.

Background Abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (aMRI) protocols have emerged as an alternative to multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) to reduce examination time and costs. Purpose To compare multiple aMRI protocols for predicting pathological stage ≥T3 (≥pT3) prostate cancer (PCa). Material and Methods One hundred and eight men undergoing staging mpMRI before radical prostatectomy (RP) were retrospectively evaluated. 3.0-T imaging was performed with a 32-channel surface coil and a protocol including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), transverse T2-weighted (tT2W) imaging, coronal T2W (cT2W) imaging, sagittal T2W (sT2) imaging, and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging. Two readers independently assessed whether any MRI observation showed stage ≥T3 on each sequence (reading order: DWI, cT2W, tT2W, sT2W, DCE). Final stage was assessed by matching readers’ assignments to pathology, and combining them into eight protocols: DWI + tT2W, DWI + cT2W + tT2W, DWI + tT2W + sT2W, DWI + cT2W + tT2W + sT2W, DWI + tT2W + DCE, DWI + cT2W + tT2W + DCE, DWI + tT2W + sT2W + DCE, and mpMRI. Diagnostic accuracy and inter-reader agreement for aMRI protocols were calculated. Results Prevalence of ≥pT3 PCa was 31.5%. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of aMRI protocols were comparable to mpMRI for R1. Sensitivity was 74.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 64.8–72.0) to 77.1% (95% CI 67.9–84.4), and NPV 86.8% (95% CI 78.6–92.3) to 88.1% (95% CI 80.1–93.3). All accuracy measures of the various aMRI protocols were similar to mpMRI also for R2, albeit all slightly lower compared to R1. On a per-protocol basis, there was substantial inter-reader agreement in predicting stage ≥pT3 (k 0.63–0.67). Conclusion When comparing the diagnostic accuracy of multiple aMRI protocols against mpMRI for predicting stage ≥pT3 PCa, the protocol with the fewest sequences (DWI + tT2W) is apparently equivalent to standard mpMRI.

Background Motion is a relevant cause of artifacts in breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), potentially degrading image quality, even with optimized protocols. Purpose To investigate the causes of motion artifacts (MA) impacting on image quality (IQ) of contrast-enhanced breast MRI. Material and Methods Retrospective two-center study on consecutive 1.5-T contrast-enhanced breast MRI, independently reviewed by two radiologists on first subtracted and maximum intensity projection images to define the side most affected by MA. IQ was scored as 1 (optimal), 2 (reduced, but without reduction of diagnostic power), or 3 (reduced, with reduced diagnostic power). Correlations with injection side, breast size (A/B vs. C/D cups), patient age, clinical indication, and MRI scanner/protocol were assessed using χ2 and Fisher’s exact statistics. Results In total, 237 examinations were included, with right injection performed in 124 (52%) and left in 113 (48%). MA were more frequent on the side ipsilateral to the injection (144/237, 61%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 54–67%) than on the contralateral (93/237, 95% CI 33–46%) ( P Conclusion MA were more frequent in breasts ipsilateral to contrast injection and showed a reduced IQ for small breasts.

The Italian College of Breast Radiologists by the Italian Society of Medical Radiology (SIRM) provides recommendations for breast care provision and procedural prioritization during COVID-19 pandemic, being aware that medical decisions must be currently taken balancing patient’s individual and community safety: (1) patients having a scheduled or to-be-scheduled appointment for in-depth diagnostic breast imaging or needle biopsy should confirm the appointment or obtain a new one; (2) patients who have suspicious symptoms of breast cancer (in particular: new onset palpable nodule; skin or nipple retraction; orange peel skin; unilateral secretion from the nipple) should request non-deferrable tests at radiology services; (3) asymptomatic women performing annual mammographic follow-up after breast cancer treatment should preferably schedule the appointment within 1 year and 3 months from the previous check, compatibly with the local organizational conditions; (4) asymptomatic women who have not responded to the invitation for screening mammography after the onset of the pandemic or have been informed of the suspension of the screening activity should schedule the check preferably within 3 months from the date of the not performed check, compatibly with local organizational conditions. The Italian College of Breast Radiologists by SIRM recommends precautions to protect both patients and healthcare workers (radiologists, radiographers, nurses, and reception staff) from infection or disease spread on the occasion of breast imaging procedures, particularly mammography, breast ultrasound, breast magnetic resonance imaging, and breast intervention procedures.

Rationale and Objectives To compare the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (UMRI) in the preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Materials and Methods We retrospectively included 59 patients with 74 pathology-proven cancers who underwent DBT and preoperative 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging between January 2016 and February 2017. Four residents with 2–3 years of experience, blinded to pathology, independently reviewed DBT and UMRI (diffusion-weighted and unenhanced T1-weighted sequences), using the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) and a 0–5 Likert score, respectively. We calculated per-lesion sensitivity and positive predictive value of DBT, UMRI, and combined DBT+UMRI, as well as the agreement between DBT and UMRI vs. pathology in assessing cancer size (Bland-Altman analysis). Logistic regression was performed to assess clinical features predictive of missing cancer. Results Of 74 lesions, 84% were invasive ductal carcinoma, 27% of which with an in situ component; 31% of cancers were ≤10 mm large. Sensitivity of UMRI (74–85%) was equal or higher than that of DBT (68–82%), with similar positive predictive value (93–97% vs. 98–100%, respectively). DBT+UMRI increased the sensitivity up to 88%. UMRI showed closer limits of agreement with pathological size than DBT. Missing cancer was independently predicted by size ≤10 mm on DBT, UMRI, and DBT+UMRI (odds ratio 18.7, 5.1, and 13.3, respectively), and by increased breast density on DBT alone (odds ratio 3.50). Conclusion UMRI was equal or better than DBT in the preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Combined imaging achieved up to 88% per-lesion sensitivity, suggesting potential use in clinical practice.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is gaining ever-increasing acceptance in the preoperative and postoperative evaluation of liver-transplanted patients. While indications are still a matter of research, CEUS is used in tertiary centers to supplement ultrasound (US) and Color Doppler US examination, with the potential of providing a comprehensive first-line ultrasound-based diagnosis. Alternatively, CEUS is used as a problem-solving tool when previous cross-sectional or US imaging was inconclusive, especially in assessing hepatocellular carcinoma, parenchymal perfusion abnormalities, the vascular status, and even the biliary tree. This review describes the potential use for CEUS in the setting of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).

The American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR BI-RADS) has been very early used for the interpretation of breast MRI, also in high-risk women. In the general population, the application of the BI-RADS allowed for a very good diagnostic performance, although associated with rather low inter-reader agreement. This good performance was seen also for the application of the BI-RADS lexicon in screening high-risk women. Cancer in high-risk women can present with relatively subtle features on mammography or ultrasound, but MRI features of malignancy according to the BI-RADS lexicon are found in the vast majority of the cases and allow for a correct management. Some issues still have to be considered. First, for probably benign findings (BI-RADS 3), the lexicon fails to define exactly the lesion characteristics. Furthermore, areas of non-mass enhancement and foci can create problems regarding their best management in high-risk women. Finally, background parenchymal enhancement is usually easy to recognize, and it does not hide suspicious lesions but, in some cases, can be difficult to interpret and a short-term follow-up may be necessary.

To evaluate the rates of malignant and of high-risk lesions among sonographically occult architectural distortions (AD) visible only on digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and compare them with AD visible on 2D mammography (2D) and DBT.The records of 1104 DBT-vacuum assisted biopsies (DBT-VAB) were retrospectively reviewed and 218 cases of AD were identified. Complete radiologic examinations and pathologic results were available for 113 sonographically occult AD (1 clinically-detected, 112 clinically-occult). 2D and DBT images were reviewed and AD were divided into a "DBT-detected" group (visible on only DBT) and a "2D-detected" group (visible both in 2D and DBT). The rates of malignant and of high-risk lesions in the "DBT-detected" AD group were calculated and compared to those of the "2D-detected" AD group.Thirty-five (31%) of 113 AD were assessed as "DBT-detected", while 78 (69%) as "2D-detected". DBT-VAB results were benign lesions in 63 (56%) AD, high-risk lesions in 32 (28%) AD and malignant lesions in 18 (16%) AD. Four (12.5%) high-risk lesions were upgraded to malignancy at surgery. Based on final pathology, the malignancy rate was significantly higher in the "DBT-detected" group than the "2D-detected" group (34% [12/35 cases] vs 13% [10/78]; p 0.05). The high-risk lesion rates were 32% (11/35 cases) in the "DBT-detected" group and 22% (17/78 cases) in the "2D-detected" group (p 0.05).AD visible on only DBT proved to be malignant in about one third of cases, which exceeded the malignancy rate of AD visible on also 2D. A similar proportion of DBT-only AD was represented by high-risk lesions.

AIM To compare high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) findings between humoral primary immunodeficiencies (hPIDs) subtypes; to correlate these findings to pulmonary function tests (PFTs). METHODS We retrospectively identified 52 consecutive adult patients with hPIDs who underwent 64-row HRCT and PFTs at the time of diagnosis. On a per-patient basis, an experienced radiologist recorded airway abnormalities (bronchiectasis, airway wall thickening, mucus plugging, tree-in-bud, and air-trapping) and parenchymal-interstitial abnormalities (consolidations, ground-glass opacities, linear and/or irregular opacities, nodules, and bullae/cysts) found on HRCT. The chi-square test was performed to compare the prevalence of each abnormality among patients with different subtypes of hPIDs. Overall logistic regression analysis was performed to assess whether HRCT findings predicted obstructive and/or restrictive PFTs results (absent-to-mild vs moderate-to-severe). RESULTS Thirty-eight of the 52 patients with hPIDs showed common variable immunodeficiency disorders (CVID), while the remaining 14 had CVID-like conditions (i.e., 11 had isolated IgG subclass deficiencies and 3 had selective IgA deficiencies). The prevalence of most HRCT abnormalities was not significantly different between CVID and CVID-like patients (P > 0.05), except for linear and/or irregular opacities (prevalence of 31.6% in the CVID group and 0 in the CVID-like group; P = 0.0427). Airway wall thickening was the most frequent HRCT abnormality found in both CVID and CVID-like patients (71% of cases in both groups). The presence of tree-in-bud abnormalities was an independent predictor of moderate-to-severe obstructive defects at PFTs (Odds Ratio, OR, of 18.75, P < 0.05), while the presence of linear and/or irregular opacities was an independent predictor of restrictive defects at PFTs (OR = 13.00; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION CVID and CVID-like patients showed similar HRCT findings. Tree-in-bud and linear and/or irregular opacities predicted higher risks of, respectively, obstructive and restrictive defects at PFTs.

Purpose To investigate whether combined Digital breast tomosynthesis and Automated breast volume scanner (DBT-ABVS) are comparable to Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in staging breast cancer. Methods We retrospectively included seventy-three patients with histologically proven breast cancer who underwent preoperative DBT, ABVS and 1.5 T MRI in the period July 2015–July 2016. Two radiologists in consensus recorded the number, site and Breast imaging-reporting and data system (BI-RADS) category of breast findings during two independent reading strategies, i.e. DBT-ABVS vs. MRI. Using histology or 1-year follow up as the standard of reference, we calculated the accuracy for cancer of both imaging strategies. Bland-Altman analysis was used to evaluate the agreement between MRI vs. DBT or ABVS in cancer size assessment. Results Patients showed a total of 160 lesions (108 malignant and 52 benign). Malignant lesions were unifocal, multifocal, multicentric and biltateral in 53, 15, 4 and 1 cases, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy of DBT-ABVS vs. MRI was comparable for all cancers (90.0% [95%C.I. 84.3–94.2] vs. 93.8% [95%C.I. 88.8–97.0], respectively). DBT-ABVS showed lower sensitivity and positive predictive values for additional disease (76.5% [95%C.I. 58.8–89.3] vs. 91.7% [95%C.I. 84.6–96.1], and 78.8% [95%C.I. 61.0–91.0] vs 93.4% [95%C.I. 86.9–97.3], respectively). Compared to MRI, ABVS + DBT missed 6 lesions, including two invasive cancers and one extensive intravascular invasion associated to ductal carcinoma in situ. Bland-Altman analysis showed ABVS to agree with MRI at a higher extent than DBT in assessing cancer size. Conclusions Though less performing than MRI, DBT-ABVS showed acceptable diagnostic accuracy in staging breast cancer. This strategy might be used if MRI is unavailable or unfeasible.

Background Most studies assessing interreader agreement of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v. 2 (PI-RADS v2) have used biopsy as the standard of reference, thus carrying the risk of not definitively noting all existent cancers. Purpose To evaluate the interreader agreement in assessing prostate cancer (PCa) of PI-RADS v2, using whole-mount histology as the standard of reference. Study type Monocentric prospective cohort study. Population In all, 48 patients with biopsy-proven PCa referred for radical prostatectomy, undergoing staging multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) between May 2016 to February 2017. Field strength/sequence 3.0T system using high-resolution T2 -weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging (echo-planar imaging with maximum b-value 2000 sec/mm2 ), and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging (T1 -weighted high resolution isotropic volume examination; THRIVE) ASSESSMENT: Three radiologists blinded to final histology (2-8 years of experience) analyzed mpMRI images independently, scoring imaging findings in accordance with PI-RADS v2. On a per-lesion basis, we calculated overall and pairwise interreader agreement in assigning PI-RADS categories, as well as assessing malignancy with categories ≥3 or ≥4, and stage ≥pT3. Statistical tests Cohen's kappa analysis of agreement. Results On 71 lesions found on histology, there was moderate agreement in assigning PI-RADS categories to all cancers (k = 0.53) and clinically significant cancers (csPCa) (k = 0.47). Assessing csPCa with PI-RADS ≥4 cutoff provided higher agreement than PI-RADS ≥3 cutoff (k = 0.63 vs. 0.57). Interreader agreement was higher between more experienced readers, with the most experienced one achieving the highest cancer detection rate (0.73 for csPCa using category ≥4). There was substantial agreement in assessing stage ≥pT3 (k = 0.72). Data conclusion We found moderate to substantial agreement in assigning the PI-RADS v2 categories and assessing the spectrum of cancers found on whole-mount histology, with category 4 as the most reproducible cutoff for csPCa. Readers' experience influenced interreader agreement and cancer detection rate. Level of evidence 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:546-555.

Background:Persistent enlargement of major salivary glands (SGs) is one of the main risk factors for B-cell lymphoma in primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS). The Ultrasound-guided Core Needle Biopsy (US-guided CNB) could be a novel technique for the management of SGs enlargement in pSS (1).Objectives:To evaluate the procedure safety and the patient tolerance of US-guided CNB in pSS patients with major SGs enlargement.Methods:Consecutive patients, with either definite or clinically suspected pSS, and with clinical indication for SGs biopsy due to persistent glandular enlargement were screened for US-guided CNB from September 2019 to December 2020. All patients were evaluated clinically between 1 and 2 weeks and 12 weeks following US-guided CNB. All patients were asked to complete a questionnaire to report post-procedural complications (Figure 1, English version) and intra- and post-procedural pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The complications were classified as transient (Results:US-guided CNB was performed in 21 glands (12 parotid and 9 submandibular glands) in 20 pSS patients. 16/20 (80%) patients fulfilled the ACR-EULAR classification criteria for pSS (2). The mean age at the time of biopsy was 62.1 (±11.7) years. US-guided CNB was well tolerated, no long-term complications were reported in the follow-up period (mean 9.5 ±5.7 months). Only transient complications were noticed in 11 patients (55%). In particular, two cases of local swelling at the biopsy site lasting no more than 6 days, one case of local bleeding and subsequently hematoma of the submandibular area, one case of transient facial paresis (lasting less than one hour), seven cases of post-procedural mild local pain, that resolved within 10 days without the need of analgesics (Table 1). The procedure was well tolerated, with a very low reported intra-operative pain (mean VAS 1.74 ±2.49) and a mean post-operative pain VAS of 1.39 (±2.33). The biopsy sampling was diagnostic in 19/20 patients (95%).Conclusion:US-guided CNB represents a novel approach for the management of pSS patients with SGs enlargement. This procedure shows a remarkable patient safety and tolerance, allowing an adequate glandular sampling and definite diagnosis in almost all the studied patients.References:[1]Zabotti A, Zandonella Callegher S, Lorenzon M, Pegolo E, Scott CA, Tel A, et al. Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy compared with open biopsy: a new diagnostic approach to salivary gland enlargement in Sjögren’s syndrome? Rheumatology (Oxford) 2020.[2]Shiboski CH, Shiboski SC, Seror R, Criswell LA, Labetoulle M, Lietman TM, Rasmussen A, Scofield H, Vitali C, Bowman SJ, Mariette X; International Sjögren’s Syndrome Criteria Working Group. 2016 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Classification Criteria for Primary Sjögren’s Syndrome: A Consensus and Data-Driven Methodology Involving Three International Patient Cohorts. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Jan;69(1):35-45. doi: 10.1002/art.39859. Epub 2016 Oct 26. PMID: 27785888; PMCID: PMC5650478.Table 1.Description of complicationsComplications of US-guided CNBPatients presenting complications, n/N (%)11/20 (55%)Description of transient complicationsSwelling at biopsy site, n2Bleeding, n1Hematoma, n1Local Pain, n7Local infection, n0Sialocele or fistula, n0Anaesthesia/paraesthesia, n0Transient facial palsy (< 1 hour), n1No persistent complications reportedAll the above specified complications were transient (< 12 weeks). No persistent complications were reported in the follow up.Figure 1.Post-biopsy complication QuestionnaireDisclosure of Interests:Alen Zabotti Speakers bureau: UCB, Novartis, Janssen, Paid instructor for: Amgen, Consultant of: Janssen, Ivan Giovannini: None declared, Sara Zandonella Callegher: None declared, Valeria Manfrè: None declared, Michele Lorenzon Consultant of: not relevant for this study, Enrico Pegolo: None declared, Cathryn Ann Scott: None declared, Alessandro Tel: None declared, Massimo Robiony Consultant of: not relevant for this study, Grant/research support from: not relevant for this study, Chiara Zuiani Consultant of: not relevant for this study, Grant/research support from: not relevant for this study, Salvatore De Vita Consultant of: GSK, Roche, Grant/research support from: not relevant for this study

Preoperative breast volume estimation is very important for the success of the breast surgery. In this study four different breast volume determination methods were compared. The end-point of this prospective study was to evaluate the concordance between different modalities of breast volume assessment (MRI, BREAST-V, mastectomy specimen weight, conversion from weight to volume of mastectomy specimen) and the breast prosthetic volume implanted. The study enrolled 64 patients between 2017 and 2019, who had all been treated by the same surgeons for monolateral nipple–areola complex-sparing mastectomy and implant breast reconstruction. Only patients who had a breast reconstruction classified as “excellent” from an objective (BCCT.core software) and subjective (questionnaire) point of view at the 6-month interval after the operation were included in the study. Data analysis highlighted a strong correlation between the volumes of the chosen prostheses and the weights of mastectomy converted into volume, especially for patients with grades B and C parenchymal density. The values of the agreement between the volumes of the chosen prostheses and the assessments from MRI and BREAST -V proved to be lower than expected from the literature. None of the four studied methods presented any strong correlation with the initial breast width. Our results suggest that conversion from weight to volume of mastectomy specimen should be used to assist in determining the volume of the breast implant to be implanted. This method would help the reconstructive surgeon guide the choice of the most appropriate implant preoperatively.

To compare automated breast volume scanner (ABVS), ultrasound (US) and MRI in measuring breast cancer size, and evaluate the agreement between ABVS and US in assessing lesion location and sonographic features. We retrospectively included 98 women with 100 index cancers who had undergone US and ABVS followed by 1.5T MRI. Images were interpreted by a pool of readers reporting lesion size, location and breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) features. Bland-Altman analysis (with logarithmic data transformation), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cohen’s kappa statistic were used for statistical analysis. MRI showed the best absolute agreement with histology in measuring cancer size (ICC 0.93), with LOA comparable to those of ABVS (0.63–1.99 vs. 0.52–1.73, respectively). Though ABVS and US had highly concordant measurements (ICC 0.95), ABVS showed better agreement with histology (LOA 0.52–1.73 vs. 0.45–1.86, respectively), corresponding to a higher ICC (0.85 vs. 0.75, respectively). Except for posterior features (k=0.39), the agreement between US and ABVS in attributing site and BI-RADS features ranged from substantial to almost perfect (k=0.68–0.85). ABVS performs better than US and approaches MRI in predicting breast cancer size. ABVS performs comparably to US in sonographic assessment of lesions. • ABVS approaches MRI in predicting breast cancer size. • ABVS is equivalent to US in localising and characterising breast cancer. • ABVS is more accurate than US in assessing breast cancer size. • ABVS has the potential to replace US in breast cancer staging.

Automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) is a recently introduced ultrasonography technique, developed with the purpose to standardize breast ultrasonography and overcome some limitations of handheld ultrasound (HHUS), such as operator dependence and the considerable amount of medical time necessary to perform and interpret HHUS. This new ultrasonography technique separates the moment of image acquisition (that may be performed also by a technician) from that of its interpretation, increasing reproducibility, reducing operator-dependence and physician time. Moreover, multiplanar reconstructions, especially the coronal view, introduce new diagnostic information. ABUS, with those advantages, has the potential to be used as an adjunctive tool to screening mammography, especially in the dense breast, where mammography has a relatively low sensitivity. Women's awareness of risks related to breast density is a hot topic, especially in the USA where legislative breast density notification laws increase the demand for supplemental ultrasound screening. Therefore, ABUS might have the potential to respond to this need. The purpose of this article is to present a summary of current state-of-the-art of ABUS technology and applications, with an emphasis on breast cancer screening. This article discusses also how to overcome some ABUS limitations, in order to be familiar with the new technique.

Liver transplantation (LT) is the treatment of choice for end-stage chronic liver disease, fulminant liver failure and early stage hepatocellular carcinoma. As discussed in this review, state-of-the-art imaging modalities including ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) play a pivotal role in the selection of patients and donors, as well as in early detection of those complications at risk of impairing graft function and/or survival. We also illustrate main imaging findings related to the wide spectrum of clinical problems raised by LT.

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) is a recently introduced technique aimed to perform two-stage hepatectomy in patients with a variety of primary or secondary neoplastic lesions. ALPSS is based on a preliminary liver resection associated with ligation of the portal branch directed to the diseased hemiliver (DH), followed by hepatectomy after an interval of time in which the future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophied adequately (partly because of preserved arterialization of the DH). Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) play a pivotal role in patients' selection and FLR assessment before and after the procedure, as well as in monitoring early and late complications, as we aim to review in this paper. Moreover, we illustrate main abdominal MDCT and MRI findings related to ALPPS.

Objective: To evaluate the usefulness of short-term (6 months) follow-up in patients with Breast Imaging Report and Data System (BI-RADS) 3 and 4a lesions, after a diagnosis of fibroadenoma at an image-guided biopsy. Patients and Methods: The data of 318 women with 349 biopsy-proven fibroadenomas, a 6-month follow-up, and a follow-up of ≥ 24 months were retrospectively reviewed. Information on clinical history, lesion characteristics on ultrasound (US), mammography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), BI-RADS classification, and follow-up was collected. The false-negative (FN) rate and the negative predictive value (NPV) for the biopsy were calculated. Results: 43 patients (13.5%) presented with a palpable nodule; 18 (5.7%) had a history of breast cancer. There were 334 lesions visible on US (95.7%), 57 on US and mammography (16.3%), and 15 on mammography only (4.3%); 37 lesions were first detected on MRI. All lesions were stable at 6 months. After an at least 1-year follow-up, 4 lesions changed their features and were excised. Histology showed 1 invasive lobular cancer, 1 ductal carcinoma in situ, 1 phyllodes tumor, and 1 papilloma. The FN rate of the needle biopsy was 1.1% and the NPV was 98.9%. Conclusion: For lesions initially described as BI-RADS 3 and 4a with a histological diagnosis of fibroadenoma after biopsy, short-term follow-up can be avoided.

BACKGROUND It is unclear whether clinical models including the Partin tables (PT), the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nomogram (MSKCCn), and the cancer of the prostate risk assessment (CAPRA) can benefit from incorporating multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) when staging prostate cancer (PCa). PURPOSE To compare the accuracy of clinical models, mpMRI, and mpMRI plus clinical models in predicting stage ≥pT3 of PCa. STUDY TYPE Prospective monocentric cohort study. POPULATION Seventy-three patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between 2016-2018. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE 3.0T using turbo spin echo (TSE) imaging, single-shot echoplanar diffusion-weighted imaging, and T1 -weighted high-resolution-isotropic-volume-examination (THRIVE) contrast-enhanced imaging. ASSESSMENT We calculated the probability of extraprostatic extension (EPE) using the PT and MSKCC, as well as the CAPRA score. Three readers with 2-8 years of experience in mpMRI independently staged PCa on imaging. STATISTICAL TESTS Receiver operating characteristics analysis and logistic regression analysis to investigate the per-patient accuracy of mpMRI vs. clinical models vs. mpMRI plus clinical models in predicting stage ≥pT3. The alpha level was 0.05. RESULTS Median probability for EPE and MSKCCn was 27.3% and 47.0%, respectively. Median CAPRA score was 3. Stage ≥pT3 occurred in 32.9% of patients. Areas under the curve (AUCs) were 0.62 for PT, 0.62 for MSKCCn, 0.64 for CAPRA, and 0.73-0.75 for mpMRI (readers 1-3) (P > 0.05 for all comparisons). Compared with mpMRI, the combination of mpMRI with PT or MSKCCn provided lower AUCs (P > 0.05 for all the readers), while the combination with CAPRA provided significantly higher (P < 0.05) AUCs in the case of readers 1 and 3. On multivariable analysis, mpMRI by reader 1 was the only independent predictor of stage ≥pT3 (odds ratio 7.40). DATA CONCLUSION: mpMRI was more accurate than clinical models and mpMRI plus clinical models in predicting stage ≥pT3, except for the combination of mpMRI and CAPRA in two out of three readers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:1604-1613.

IntroductionLung function abnormalities are common in sickle cell anaemia (SCA) but data from sub-Saharan Africa are limited. We hypothesised that children with SCA from West Africa had worse lung function than their counterparts from Europe.MethodsThis prospective cross-sectional study evaluated spirometry and anthropometry in black African individuals with SCA (haemoglobin phenotype SS) aged 6–18 years from Nigeria and the UK, when clinically stable. Age-matched controls were also included in Nigeria to validate the Global Lung Initiative spirometry reference values.ResultsNigerian SCA patients (n=154) had significant reductions in both FEV1 and FVC of ~1 z-score compared with local controls (n=364) and ~0.5 z-scores compared with the UK patients (n=101). Wasting (body mass index z-score1/FVC≥−1.64).ConclusionsThis study showed that chronic respiratory impairment is more severe in children with SCA from West Africa than Europe. Our findings suggest the utility of implementing respiratory assessment in African children with SCA to early identify those with chronic lung injury, eligible for closer follow-up and more aggressive therapies.

Objective To assess the accuracy of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) using whole-mount sections after radical prostatectomy (RP) as reference standard. Methods Forty-eight patients undergoing mpMRI before RP were prospectively enrolled. Two experienced radiologists independently scored and mapped imaging findings according to PI-RADS v2. One experienced uropathologist mapped cancers detected on whole-mount sections using the PI-RADS v2 sector scheme. Per-lesion and per-patient analyses were run. Primary outcomes were sensitivity and false discovery rate (FDR) in detecting csPCa using PI-RADS v2 score ≥3 and ≥4 as thresholds. Secondary outcome was inter-reader agreement. Results On the per-lesion analysis, sensitivity and FDR at the PI-RADS v2 threshold score ≥3 were 0.75 and 0.17 for Reader 1, and 0.67 and 0.13 for Reader 2, respectively. At the PI-RADS v2 threshold score ≥4, sensitivity was slightly lower, and FDR nearly halved for both readers. On the per-patient analysis, sensitivity for csPCa at the PI-RADS v2 threshold score ≥3 was 0.85 for Reader 1, and 0.78 for Reader 2. At the PI-RADS v2 threshold score ≥4, sensitivity was slightly lower for both readers. Inter-reader agreement was substantial (k 0.72 and 0.65 for PI-RADS v2 threshold score ≥3 and ≥4, respectively). Conclusion In our prospective study with pathology after RP as standard of reference, PI-RADS v2 showed good sensitivity in detecting csPCa on mpMRI with substantial agreement between 2 experienced readers. Threshold score ≥4 had lower FDR.

Women who were previously treated for breast cancer (BC) are an important particular subgroup of women at intermediate BC risk. Their breast follow-up should be planned taking in consideration a 1.0-1.5 % annual rate of loco-regional recurrences and new ipsilateral or contralateral BCs during 15-20 years, and be based on a regional/district invitation system. This activity should be carried out by a Department of Radiology integrating screening and diagnostics in the context of a Breast Unit. We recommend the adoption of protocols dedicated to women previously treated for BC, with a clear definition of responsibilities, methods for invitation, site(s) of visits, methods for clinical and radiological evaluation, follow-up duration, role and function of family doctors and specialists. These women will be invited to get a mammogram in dedicated sessions starting from the year after the end of treatment. The planned follow-up duration will be at least 10 years and will be defined on the basis of patient's age and preferences, taking into consideration organizational matters. Special agreements can be defined in the case of women who have their follow-up planned at other qualified centers. Dedicated screening sessions should include: evaluation of familial/personal history (if previously not done) for identifying high-risk conditions which could indicate a different screening strategy; immediate evaluation of mammograms by one or, when possible, two breast radiologists with possible addition of supplemental mammographic views, digital breast tomosynthesis, clinical breast examination, breast ultrasound; and prompt planning of possible further workup. Results of these screening sessions should be set apart from those of general female population screening and presented in dedicated reports. The following research issues are suggested: further risk stratification and effectiveness of follow-up protocols differentiated also for BC pathologic subtype and molecular classification, and evaluation of different models of survivorship care, also in terms of cost-effectiveness.

Purpose To investigate the impact of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) on risk group assessment of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) initially addressed to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Materials and methods We prospectively performed mpMRI (3.0Tsystem) in 44 patients addressed to EBRT, using a multiparametric protocol (high-resolution multiplanar T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging). Risk group was assessed in accordance with the National comprehensive cancer network (NCCN) categories, by combining prostate-specific-antigen level, Gleason score and the T-stage as established by digital rectal examination (clinical risk assessment; c-RA) versus mpMRI (mpMRI-risk assessment; mpMRI-RA). The agreement between c-RA and mpMRI-RA was investigated using Cohen's kappa. Results Patients were included in very low/low risk, intermediate risk, high risk, very high risk and metastatic NCCN categories in 10 (22.7%), 18 (40.9%), 15 (34.1%), 1 (2.3%) and 0 cases using c-RA vs. 8 (18.2%), 14 (31.8%), 14 (31.8%), 4 (9.1%) and 4 (9.1%) cases using mpMRI-RA, respectively, with only moderate agreement ( k = 0.43). mpMRI-RA determined risk downgrading in 2/44 patients (4.5%), and risk upgrading in 16/44 patients (36.3%). After mpMRI, EBRT remained indicated in all patients. Conclusion mpMRI changed clinical risk stratification in about 41% of patients with PCa, with potential impact on EBRT planning.

Purpose To reduce the fraction number in Partial Breast Irradiation (PBI) with initial prescription of 40 Gy in 10 fractions using radiobiological models with specific focus on risk of moderate/severe radiation-induced fibrosis (RIF) and report clinical results. Methods and materials 68 patients (patient group A) were treated with 40 Gy in 10 fractions delivered by field-in-field, forward-planned IMRT. Isotoxic regimens with decreasing number of fractions were calculated using Biological Effective Dose (BED) to the breast. Risk for RIF in hypofractionated treatment was predicted by calculating NTCP from DVHs of group A rescaled to fractions and dose of novel regimens. Moderate/severe RIF was prospectively scored during follow-up. Various NTCP models, with and without incomplete repair correction, were assessed from difference to observed incidence of RIF. In order to verify the value for α/β of 3 Gy assumed for breast, we fitted α/β to observed incidences of moderate/severe RIF. Results Treatments with 35 Gy/7f and 28 Gy/4f were selected for the fraction reduction protocol. 75 patients (group B) were treated in 35 Gy/7f. Incidence of moderate/severe RIF was 5.9% in group A, 5.3% in group B. The NTCP model with correction for incomplete repair had lowest difference from observed RIF. The α/β obtained from fitting was 2.8 (95%CIs 1.1–10.7) Gy. Conclusions The hypofractionated regimen was well tolerated. The model for NTCP corrected for incomplete repair was the most accurate and an assumed α/β value of 3 Gy is consistent with our patient data. The hypofractionation protocol is continuing with patients treated with 28 Gy/4f.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To evaluate the impact on perceived report quality of referring rheumatologists for a chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) structured report (SR) template for patients with connective tissue disease (CTD), compared to the traditional narrative report (NR). MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively considered 123 HRCTs in patients with CTD. Three radiologists, blinded to the original NRs they wrote during clinical routine, re-reported each HRCT using an SR dedicated template. We then divided all NR-SR couples into three groups (41 HRCT each). Each group was evaluated by one of three rheumatologists (R1, R2, R3), who expressed their perceived report quality for the respective pools of NRs and SRs in terms of completeness, clarity (both on a 10-points scale), and clinical relevance (on a 5-points scale). The Wilcoxon test and the McNemar test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS For each rheumatologist, SR received higher ratings compared to NR for completeness (median ratings: R1, 10 vs. 7; R2, 10 vs. 8; R3, 10 vs. 6, all p

To evaluate excision histology outcome of B3a lesions diagnosed at imaging-guided core biopsy and assess whether clinical and radiologic features may predict upgrade to malignancy. A total of 153 B3a lesions (74 papillomas, 51 radial scars and 28 fibro-epithelial lesions) that underwent surgical excision were assessed. PPV for malignancy in all B3a lesions and specific for each sub-category was evaluated. Multivariate analysis was conducted to identify association between clinical (age, family or personal history of breast cancer, symptoms), diagnostic findings (imaging modality, lesion size, final BI-RADS category) and final excision outcome. Eleven (7%) of 153 B3a lesions were upgraded to malignancy. All carcinomas diagnosed on excision were non-high grade DCIS. Following features were significantly associated with malignancy: lesions identified only on mammography (3/21; 14%), both mammography and ultrasound (7/44; 16%), lesion size > 10 mm (10/74; 13.5%) and BI-RADS category 4-5 (8/29; 27.6%). The absence of residual microcalcification after biopsy was associated with decreased risk for malignancy (15/16[93.7%]; p = 0.0297). Lesion size > 10 mm (OR = 9.3832; 95%; p = 0.0398) and BI-RADS category 4–5 (OR = 12.6004; 95%; p = 0.0006) were found to be independent predictors of upgrade to malignancy. B3a lesions are associated with low risk of malignancy at excision. Lesion size > 10 mm and BI-RADS 4–5 category may represent useful predictors of upgrade to malignancy.

BACKGROUND Previous studies have shown that abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (aMRI) compares well to full-protocol MRI (fpMRI) in breast cancer (BC) screening, with the potential advantage of a less costly and complex examination. To our knowledge, the role for aMRI in staging BC has been poorly investigated, especially in assessing additional disease (ie, additional lesions compared to the index one prompting the examination). PURPOSE To compare aMRI and fpMRI in detecting additional disease in BC staging. STUDY TYPE Retrospective monocentric cohort study. POPULATION In all, 87 patients with 89 biopsy-proven index lesions referred to staging fpMRI between January-June 2016. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE A 1.5T magnet using short tau inversion recovery (STIR) T2 -weighted imaging, echoplanar diffusion-weighted imaging, and 3D fast long angle shot (FLASH) T1 -weighted imaging. ASSESSMENT During independent sessions, four readers with 1.5-20 years of experience in breast imaging, blinded to the pathological examination and previous imaging, assessed multifocal, multicentric, and contralateral additional lesions on fpMRI and aMRI (including precontrast T1 -weighted 3D FLASH sequence, first postcontrast subtracted T1 -weighted 3D FLASH sequence, and a transverse maximum intensity projection reconstruction). STATISTICAL TESTS We calculated the per-lesion cancer detection rate (CDR), positive predictive value (PPV), and false discovery rate (FDR) for additional disease, assessing the significance of intrareader differences in CDR with the McNemar test. RESULTS Pathological analysis found 36 additional lesions (multifocal, multicentric, and contralateral in 20, 15, and 1 cases, respectively). Readers' CDR was comparably high using aMRI (range 88.9-94.4%) or fpMRI (range 91.7-94.4%) (P > 0.05). PPV and FDR of aMRI (ranges 76.2-84.6% and 15.4-23.8%, respectively), and fpMRI (ranges 76.7-82.9% and 17.2-23.3%, respectively) were comparable on an intrareader basis. Using aMRI, two out of four readers induced two false-negative cases (one case each) with presumably limited impact on surgical planning (multifocal cancers

To evaluate the agreement between automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) and conventional ultrasound (US) as a second-look (SL) tool for assessing additional findings found on MRI.Over a 7-month period, we prospectively assigned to SL-US and SL-ABVS all patients undergoing 1.5 T breast MRI in whom additional findings were found. Five experienced breast radiologists independently interpreted SL-US and SL-ABVS in blinded sessions to evaluate the detection rate of MRI findings and assign them to BI-RADS categories. We calculated the agreement between the two methods in assessing MRI findings as significant (BI-RADS 3-5) versus not significant (BI-RADS 1-2), as well as their cancer detection rate.In a population of 131 patients, SL-ABVS and SL-US showed a comparable detection rate of MRI findings (69.3 vs. 71.5%) (p 0.05; McNemar test), with an almost perfect agreement in assessing them as significant or not (k = 0.94). This translated into a comparably high cancer detection rate (83.8% for SL-ABVS vs. 87.0% for SL-US). Only 1/31 cancers was missed by SL-ABVS.SL-ABVS and SL-US are nearly equivalent in assessing the significance of MRI findings, leading to a comparable cancer detection rate. SL-ABVS has the potential to replace SL-US in the SL scenario.• SL-ABVS shows almost perfect agreement with SL-US in assessing MRI findings. • SL-ABVS shows a comparably high cancer detection rate with respect to SL-US. • SL-ABVS has the potential to replace SL-US in evaluating additional MRI findings.